Author Topic: the post-trump gop  (Read 52383 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline sys

  • Contributor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 40472
  • your reputation will never recover, nor should it.
    • View Profile
Re: the post-trump gop
« Reply #275 on: January 30, 2021, 04:22:37 PM »
yeah, we're mumped.
"experienced commanders will simply be smeared and will actually go to the meat."

Offline MakeItRain

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 44804
    • View Profile
Re: the post-trump gop
« Reply #276 on: January 30, 2021, 04:23:51 PM »
I think we know the answer:

Quote
Mark Leibovich (@MarkLeibovich) Tweeted:
Who wins a head-to-head GOP primary today between Romney and MTG?

You don't really think it'd be greene do you?

Offline Sandstone Outcropping

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 8556
  • a punk who rarely ever took advice
    • View Profile
Re: the post-trump gop
« Reply #277 on: January 30, 2021, 04:30:50 PM »
I think we know the answer:

Quote
Mark Leibovich (@MarkLeibovich) Tweeted:
Who wins a head-to-head GOP primary today between Romney and MTG?

You don't really think it'd be greene do you?
Guess it depends on if we are talking about a national primary or state primary. I think she'd have a great chance at beating Romney in Kansas. You should see all the Trump signs and flags that are still up here in Smallville.

Offline sys

  • Contributor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 40472
  • your reputation will never recover, nor should it.
    • View Profile
Re: the post-trump gop
« Reply #278 on: January 30, 2021, 04:48:20 PM »
against romney, it would be greene.  romney is brutally unpopular with republican voters.  i think a different "mainstream" republican would still beat greene, but it'd probably be a lot closer than it's comfortable to contemplate.
"experienced commanders will simply be smeared and will actually go to the meat."

Offline IPA4Me

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 6962
  • El Guapo
    • View Profile
    • Life Advice
Re: the post-trump gop
« Reply #279 on: January 30, 2021, 05:11:38 PM »
Unfortunately, moderates aren't very popular these days.

Sent from my moto g power using Tapatalk


Offline chum1

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 21893
    • View Profile
Re: the post-trump gop
« Reply #280 on: February 01, 2021, 03:01:08 PM »

Offline MakeItRain

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 44804
    • View Profile
Re: the post-trump gop
« Reply #281 on: February 01, 2021, 04:26:02 PM »
lol

Offline CHONGS

  • Master of the Atom
  • Administrator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 19381
    • View Profile
    • goEMAW.com
Re: the post-trump gop
« Reply #282 on: February 01, 2021, 04:49:25 PM »
Looks like the Dems are fully intending to taze their balls/vags clean off.  So stupid. 

Offline ChiComCat

  • Chawbacon
  • Contributor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 17542
    • View Profile
Re: the post-trump gop
« Reply #283 on: February 01, 2021, 04:54:15 PM »
It's funny to me that Dems are concerned about setting a "dangerous precedent" as alluded to in the article.  The GOP gives no fucks about precedent when they want something done.

Offline michigancat

  • Contributor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 53674
  • change your stupid avatar.
    • View Profile
Re: the post-trump gop
« Reply #284 on: February 01, 2021, 04:54:57 PM »
she's like that kid who got elected to the KS legislature

Offline MakeItRain

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 44804
    • View Profile
Re: the post-trump gop
« Reply #285 on: February 01, 2021, 11:02:36 PM »
she's like that kid who got elected to the KS legislature

Exactly, and should be treated the same censure her, wait for her to do something criminal then send her ass back to the hills.

Offline sonofdaxjones

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 52946
    • View Profile
Re: the post-trump gop
« Reply #286 on: February 01, 2021, 11:17:54 PM »
While Eric "love you long time" Swalwell continues to sit on committee's.

I guess someone who has "known" a Chinese spy would would know a lot about spies.

« Last Edit: February 01, 2021, 11:22:42 PM by sonofdaxjones »

Offline waks

  • this blog's dick pic expert
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 3436
  • Aggieville's Original Gastropub
    • View Profile
Re: the post-trump gop
« Reply #287 on: February 02, 2021, 05:29:53 AM »
While Eric "love you long time" Swalwell continues to sit on committee's.

I guess someone who has "known" a Chinese spy would would know a lot about spies.


Racism and improper use of punctuation in the same post. Classic Dax.

Offline Dugout DickStone

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 51303
  • BSPAC
    • View Profile
Re: the post-trump gop
« Reply #288 on: February 02, 2021, 09:54:18 AM »
While Eric "love you long time" Swalwell continues to sit on committee's.

I guess someone who has "known" a Chinese spy would would know a lot about spies.


Racism and improper use of punctuation in the same post. Classic Dax.

it's a classic grandpa post

Offline Sandstone Outcropping

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 8556
  • a punk who rarely ever took advice
    • View Profile

Offline Dugout DickStone

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 51303
  • BSPAC
    • View Profile
Re: the post-trump gop
« Reply #290 on: February 02, 2021, 02:05:18 PM »
RINO SMDH

Offline sonofdaxjones

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 52946
    • View Profile
Re: the post-trump gop
« Reply #291 on: February 02, 2021, 03:02:49 PM »
While Eric "love you long time" Swalwell continues to sit on committee's.

I guess someone who has "known" a Chinese spy would would know a lot about spies.


Racism and improper use of punctuation in the same post. Classic Dax.

Nobody circles the wagons around his party's POS like WAKS.

I'd also add Swalwell to one of the primary #blueanon ringleaders, at a Schiff'ian level 6.7 out of 7

There wasn't a single lunatic conspiracy that Swalwell didn't 1000% go in on . . . it was almost like he was engaged in a disinformation campaign on behalf of another foreign power.


Offline CNS

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 36545
  • I'm Athletes
    • View Profile
Re: the post-trump gop
« Reply #292 on: February 02, 2021, 03:15:01 PM »
I think we know the answer:

Quote
Mark Leibovich (@MarkLeibovich) Tweeted:
Who wins a head-to-head GOP primary today between Romney and MTG?

four years is a long time away, but right now i'm not sure romney would even win a primary to run for reelection to the senate.
The fact that nutcases like Greene, Goetz and Boebert are able to win elections (even if it is in a backwater congressional district) really dismays me. These people are totally detached from reality.

This is a good argument for not convicting Trump, imo.  I am not saying that this should be the route taken, but if trump is convicted, he will pull out of the GOP and do the his own party thing.  That will fracture the GOP for the foreseeable future.  If that doesn't happen, the Mitch's can fight from inside to squash the MAGA out.  You already see Mitch trying to do a little of that with MTG. 

I personally, want trump convicted, but understand it isn't going to happen.  the incentives are misaligned.  Due to the party split that would happen, most of the incumbent Pubs would have a hard time winning re-election against dems with a split party.  They aren't voting on Don.  they are voting to keep their jobs next go 'round.

Offline MakeItRain

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 44804
    • View Profile
Re: the post-trump gop
« Reply #293 on: February 02, 2021, 08:29:59 PM »
While Eric "love you long time" Swalwell continues to sit on committee's.

I guess someone who has "known" a Chinese spy would would know a lot about spies.


Racism and improper use of punctuation in the same post. Classic Dax.

Notice he didn't even bother to push back on the racism claim.

Offline sonofdaxjones

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 52946
    • View Profile
Re: the post-trump gop
« Reply #294 on: February 02, 2021, 09:05:26 PM »
Why should I fight back for being called a racist against people who call anyone who disagrees with the politics or opinions of members of their political movement a racist?

You've watered down the word racist to the point that it's utterly meaningless.

Only the most hardcore hyper-partisan douchebags would step up to defend a POS like Swalwell who sadly keeps being given positions of power by the POS who run your party.




Offline catastrophe

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 15097
    • View Profile
Re: the post-trump gop
« Reply #295 on: February 02, 2021, 09:15:21 PM »
Why should I fight back for being called a racist against people who call anyone who disagrees with the politics or opinions of members of their political movement a racist?

You've watered down the word racist to the point that it's utterly meaningless.

Only the most hardcore hyper-partisan douchebags would step up to defend a POS like Swalwell who sadly keeps being given positions of power by the POS who run your party.

Under the extremely watered down gE version of the term, are you a racist?

Offline sonofdaxjones

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 52946
    • View Profile
Re: the post-trump gop
« Reply #296 on: February 02, 2021, 09:18:24 PM »
Why should I fight back for being called a racist against people who call anyone who disagrees with the politics or opinions of members of their political movement a racist?

You've watered down the word racist to the point that it's utterly meaningless.

Only the most hardcore hyper-partisan douchebags would step up to defend a POS like Swalwell who sadly keeps being given positions of power by the POS who run your party.

Under the extremely watered down gE version of the term, are you a racist?

No, are you?

Offline catastrophe

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 15097
    • View Profile
Re: the post-trump gop
« Reply #297 on: February 02, 2021, 10:18:26 PM »
Well to be fair, I don't know what you consider to be the watered down version of gE's definition of "racist."  Tell me what it is and I can answer your question.

Offline sonofdaxjones

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 52946
    • View Profile
Re: the post-trump gop
« Reply #298 on: February 02, 2021, 10:31:39 PM »
Well to be fair, I don't know what you consider to be the watered down version of gE's definition of "racist."  Tell me what it is and I can answer your question.

Disagreeing with the politics of a liberal.


Offline catastrophe

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 15097
    • View Profile
Re: the post-trump gop
« Reply #299 on: February 02, 2021, 10:54:14 PM »
And you haven’t done that? Damn.