Author Topic: Amy Barrett Discussion Thread  (Read 8567 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline I_have_purplewood

  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 2760
    • View Profile
Re: Amy Barrett Discussion Thread
« Reply #50 on: October 13, 2020, 11:05:23 PM »
reasons I found it cringey:

1) Seemed very staged
2) It's not impressive
3) Notes and preparation aren't weaknesses
4) Republicans jerking themselves off to it

1) Didn't seem so staged to the point of cringy? 
2) On a scale of 1-10 on impressive?  Maybe 6?  She was solid.
3) Fine but give her a tad of credit?
4) There wasn't a ton of jerking off.  Cruz maybe?  And that was cringe worthy.
Fifteen minutes later, when the Kansas locker room opened its doors to the media, the Jayhawks were still crying. Literally, bawling. All of them. I've never seen anything like it, and I've seen devastated college locker rooms -- after losses in the Final Four, the national championship game -- ever

Offline sonofdaxjones

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 53160
    • View Profile
Re: Amy Barrett Discussion Thread
« Reply #51 on: October 13, 2020, 11:11:23 PM »
Just need more Amy Klobbuchar ranting about like Gin and Oxy Pelosi Jr.


Offline I_have_purplewood

  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 2760
    • View Profile
Re: Amy Barrett Discussion Thread
« Reply #52 on: October 13, 2020, 11:19:38 PM »
Just need more Amy Klobbuchar ranting about like Gin and Oxy Pelosi Jr.

lol.  Lost a ton of respect for her the last two days. 
Fifteen minutes later, when the Kansas locker room opened its doors to the media, the Jayhawks were still crying. Literally, bawling. All of them. I've never seen anything like it, and I've seen devastated college locker rooms -- after losses in the Final Four, the national championship game -- ever

Offline sonofdaxjones

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 53160
    • View Profile
Re: Amy Barrett Discussion Thread
« Reply #53 on: October 13, 2020, 11:25:35 PM »
Just need more Amy Klobbuchar ranting about like Gin and Oxy Pelosi Jr.

lol.  Lost a ton of respect for her the last two days.

Cringe level = That of Pelosi Sr. going all Gin and Oxy Senior Citizen on Wolf Blitzer.

Sounded like a Biden Rally leader at The Villages. 

Sad


Offline michigancat

  • Contributor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 53771
  • change your stupid avatar.
    • View Profile
Re: Amy Barrett Discussion Thread
« Reply #54 on: October 13, 2020, 11:57:30 PM »
reasons I found it cringey:

1) Seemed very staged
2) It's not impressive
3) Notes and preparation aren't weaknesses
4) Republicans jerking themselves off to it

1) Didn't seem so staged to the point of cringy? 
2) On a scale of 1-10 on impressive?  Maybe 6?  She was solid.
3) Fine but give her a tad of credit?
4) There wasn't a ton of jerking off.  Cruz maybe?  And that was cringe worthy.

nope

Offline Spracne

  • Point Plank'r
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *
  • Posts: 21310
  • Scholar/Gentleman, But Super Earthy/Organic
    • View Profile
Re: Amy Barrett Discussion Thread
« Reply #55 on: October 14, 2020, 12:27:49 AM »
I guarantee she mooted her ass off and was well-prepared by the likes of Cruz (former TX Solicitor General) for the "tough" questions from the Democrats. Other than that, obviously a career law professor should be able to speak extemporaneously about any number of important cases, going back AT LEAST 5 years.

Offline I_have_purplewood

  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 2760
    • View Profile
Re: Amy Barrett Discussion Thread
« Reply #56 on: October 14, 2020, 12:34:58 AM »
reasons I found it cringey:

1) Seemed very staged
2) It's not impressive
3) Notes and preparation aren't weaknesses
4) Republicans jerking themselves off to it

1) Didn't seem so staged to the point of cringy? 
2) On a scale of 1-10 on impressive?  Maybe 6?  She was solid.
3) Fine but give her a tad of credit?
4) There wasn't a ton of jerking off.  Cruz maybe?  And that was cringe worthy.

nope

yep.  also why you're a doosh and not as smart as you think you are.  you're ignorant and blinded to the point where you can't be even the least bit partial or objective to an argument and won't even look at the other side.  sad.  it's why the pit sucks. 
Fifteen minutes later, when the Kansas locker room opened its doors to the media, the Jayhawks were still crying. Literally, bawling. All of them. I've never seen anything like it, and I've seen devastated college locker rooms -- after losses in the Final Four, the national championship game -- ever

Offline star seed 7

  • hyperactive on the :lol:
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 63974
  • good dog
    • View Profile
Re: Amy Barrett Discussion Thread
« Reply #57 on: October 14, 2020, 07:54:27 AM »
Yeah, that notes tweet was lol cringe. What a weird thing to get upset about though, it doesn't even have anything to do with her.

I didn't listen to much of this, but she sounded fine aside from very obviously lying during the Harris questioning. I didn't like her perjury tap dancing during that
Hyperbolic partisan duplicitous hypocrite

Offline Rage Against the McKee

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 37086
    • View Profile
Re: Amy Barrett Discussion Thread
« Reply #58 on: October 14, 2020, 08:21:24 AM »
The bar at this point has been set that as long as a supreme court justice doesn't start slobbering at their hearing screaming about how they like beer they are going to look pretty good.

Offline 8manpick

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 19132
  • A top quartile binger, poster, and friend
    • View Profile
Re: Amy Barrett Discussion Thread
« Reply #59 on: October 14, 2020, 09:02:42 AM »
ugh so cringey

https://twitter.com/kkhasissues/status/1316067910855675909

How is that even close to cringey?
Feigning being impressed that a judge nominated to the highest court can quote cases from “years ago.” Regular lawyer dorks like Spracne and Dickstone can quote cases from years ago.

Particularly given that she knew exactly what topics would be at hand. It isn't like there were going to be a bunch of questions about intricate property law precedent.

So why would that make anyone cringe?  So many other things that happened today that are so more worthy of a cringe.

I think he's saying the dumbing down of expectations of one of the greatest legal minds in the country is cringy, not anything she did.
Yes this. The KK tweet was cringey.
:adios:

Offline Dugout DickStone

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 51456
  • BSPAC
    • View Profile
Re: Amy Barrett Discussion Thread
« Reply #60 on: October 14, 2020, 09:19:55 AM »
ugh so cringey

https://twitter.com/kkhasissues/status/1316067910855675909

How is that even close to cringey?
Feigning being impressed that a judge nominated to the highest court can quote cases from “years ago.” Regular lawyer dorks like Spracne and Dickstone can quote cases from years ago.

Paralegals can.  This was 1000% staged and she should be embarrassed that she needs that guy to run the stunt for her.  Humiliating

Offline wetwillie

  • goEMAW Poster of the WEEK
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 30377
    • View Profile
Re: Amy Barrett Discussion Thread
« Reply #61 on: October 14, 2020, 09:28:20 AM »
I was on the fence but dugout is not a political hack, this seems really damning.
When the bullets are flying, that's when I'm at my best

Offline Dugout DickStone

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 51456
  • BSPAC
    • View Profile
Re: Amy Barrett Discussion Thread
« Reply #62 on: October 14, 2020, 09:36:48 AM »
She is incredibly smart and should be confirmed.  She doesn't need a bunch kietzs cheering for her basic memorization skills.

Offline michigancat

  • Contributor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 53771
  • change your stupid avatar.
    • View Profile
Re: Amy Barrett Discussion Thread
« Reply #63 on: October 14, 2020, 09:47:09 AM »


reasons I found it cringey:

1) Seemed very staged
2) It's not impressive
3) Notes and preparation aren't weaknesses
4) Republicans jerking themselves off to it

1) Didn't seem so staged to the point of cringy? 
2) On a scale of 1-10 on impressive?  Maybe 6?  She was solid.
3) Fine but give her a tad of credit?
4) There wasn't a ton of jerking off.  Cruz maybe?  And that was cringe worthy.

nope

yep.  also why you're a doosh and not as smart as you think you are.  you're ignorant and blinded to the point where you can't be even the least bit partial or objective to an argument and won't even look at the other side.  sad.  it's why the pit sucks.

Hey man I listen and learn here all the time. Just this week sys pointed out a contradiction I had with regards to the Bernie/Biden relationship that made me stop and think and 33 and I had a nice conversation about freaking abortion of all things where I learned something about late term abortion statistics. I just don't need to go into more detail on how cringey I thought that stunt and the reaction was.

I actually wish we had more conservative/different points of view here, I always enjoy hearing from DQ, spracs, and whoever the hell else is willing to be civil while admitting they voted for Trump along with the moderates and libertarians and conmies

Offline michigancat

  • Contributor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 53771
  • change your stupid avatar.
    • View Profile
Re: Amy Barrett Discussion Thread
« Reply #64 on: October 14, 2020, 09:57:03 AM »
LOL, especially considering Keitz started this

https://twitter.com/willchamberlain/status/1316389285621366784

Offline catastrophe

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 15208
    • View Profile
Re: Amy Barrett Discussion Thread
« Reply #65 on: October 14, 2020, 10:03:48 AM »
I think many Republicans are just so impressed because they never entertained the prospect of a smart woman before.

Offline wetwillie

  • goEMAW Poster of the WEEK
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 30377
    • View Profile
Re: Amy Barrett Discussion Thread
« Reply #66 on: October 14, 2020, 10:10:06 AM »
It sounds like she is a caliber above the last nominee
When the bullets are flying, that's when I'm at my best

Offline michigancat

  • Contributor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 53771
  • change your stupid avatar.
    • View Profile
Re: Amy Barrett Discussion Thread
« Reply #67 on: October 14, 2020, 10:11:07 AM »
I think many Republicans are just so impressed because they never entertained the prospect of a smart woman before.

"wow! look at this broad memorizing stuff! well I'll be"

Offline star seed 7

  • hyperactive on the :lol:
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 63974
  • good dog
    • View Profile
Re: Amy Barrett Discussion Thread
« Reply #68 on: October 14, 2020, 10:40:05 AM »
It sounds like she is a caliber above the last nominee

Significantly.
Hyperbolic partisan duplicitous hypocrite

Offline sonofdaxjones

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 53160
    • View Profile
Re: Amy Barrett Discussion Thread
« Reply #69 on: October 14, 2020, 10:54:22 AM »
I think many Republicans are just so impressed because they never entertained the prospect of a smart woman before.

Oh no, per  :curse: :curse: :curse: BidenVoter FemDem she's just a walking womb and Haitian child trafficker who was allowed to get a couple of diplomas.


Offline MakeItRain

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 44880
    • View Profile
Re: Amy Barrett Discussion Thread
« Reply #70 on: October 14, 2020, 11:13:10 AM »
I think many Republicans are just so impressed because they never entertained the prospect of a smart woman before.

Oh no, per  :curse: :curse: :curse: BidenVoter FemDem she's just a walking womb and Haitian child trafficker who was allowed to get a couple of diplomas.

lol

Offline 8manpick

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 19132
  • A top quartile binger, poster, and friend
    • View Profile
Re: Amy Barrett Discussion Thread
« Reply #71 on: October 14, 2020, 11:36:41 AM »

conmies
:D  CONmies

You hear that Kat Kid?
:adios:

Offline michigancat

  • Contributor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 53771
  • change your stupid avatar.
    • View Profile
Re: Amy Barrett Discussion Thread
« Reply #72 on: October 14, 2020, 12:23:39 PM »

Offline Kat Kid

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 20490
    • View Profile
Re: Amy Barrett Discussion Thread
« Reply #73 on: October 14, 2020, 12:31:43 PM »
She could definitely be in some commie agitprop. very striking features.

Offline dal9

  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 1782
    • View Profile
Re: Amy Barrett Discussion Thread
« Reply #74 on: October 14, 2020, 01:17:10 PM »
The bar at this point has been set that as long as a supreme court justice doesn't start slobbering at their hearing screaming about how they like beer they are going to look pretty good.

 :thumbs: