Author Topic: Amy Barrett Discussion Thread  (Read 8568 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline steve dave

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 85311
  • Romantic Fist Attachment
    • View Profile
Amy Barrett Discussion Thread
« on: September 25, 2020, 08:41:49 PM »
My wife (libtard) told me she read that she was for felons having guns. I'm also for felons having the same gun rights as everyone else so I'm pretty much on board with her so far. what are the peggy pos and nancy negs of this person?


(Want to get rid of the ad? Register now for free!)

Offline Institutional Control

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 14954
    • View Profile
Re: Amy Barrett Discussion Thread
« Reply #1 on: September 25, 2020, 09:03:51 PM »
I only know that she’s Catholic so she must be anti-capital punishment.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Online star seed 7

  • hyperactive on the :lol:
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 63985
  • good dog
    • View Profile
Re: Amy Barrett Discussion Thread
« Reply #2 on: September 25, 2020, 09:31:03 PM »
Religious fanatic
Hyperbolic partisan duplicitous hypocrite

Offline MakeItRain

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 44880
    • View Profile
Re: Amy Barrett Discussion Thread
« Reply #3 on: September 25, 2020, 09:42:33 PM »
I feel like trump missed an opportunity by not picking the cuban lady.

Online wetwillie

  • goEMAW Poster of the WEEK
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 30388
    • View Profile
Re: Amy Barrett Discussion Thread
« Reply #4 on: September 25, 2020, 09:51:57 PM »
Twitter people say she and her religious group inspired the hand maidens tale
When the bullets are flying, that's when I'm at my best

Offline chum1

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 21915
    • View Profile
Re: Amy Barrett Discussion Thread
« Reply #5 on: September 25, 2020, 09:52:22 PM »
I've heard this and heard that the lower court's decision was so stupid it would be difficult to agree with.

https://twitter.com/ASlavitt/status/1309671290324877312

Offline MakeItRain

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 44880
    • View Profile
Re: Amy Barrett Discussion Thread
« Reply #6 on: September 25, 2020, 10:13:44 PM »
Twitter people say she and her religious group inspired the hand maidens tale

There have been some media reporting it as well but it isn't true.

Offline MakeItRain

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 44880
    • View Profile
Re: Amy Barrett Discussion Thread
« Reply #7 on: September 25, 2020, 10:17:34 PM »
I've heard this and heard that the lower court's decision was so stupid it would be difficult to agree with.

https://twitter.com/ASlavitt/status/1309671290324877312

I can't get that link to open on my phone, but they don't need her vote to make the lower court's ruling law. The best the liberal justices could hope for is a tie and that won't be good enough.

Offline Trim

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 41981
  • Pfizer PLUS Moderna and now Pfizer Bivalent
    • View Profile
Re: Amy Barrett Discussion Thread
« Reply #8 on: September 25, 2020, 10:31:33 PM »
She’s mumped at least 5 times without subsequent abortions.

Offline chum1

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 21915
    • View Profile
Re: Amy Barrett Discussion Thread
« Reply #9 on: September 26, 2020, 08:40:33 PM »
This tells me more about her than anything else I've heard.

https://twitter.com/AAPolicyForum/status/1310023125829144577

Offline chum1

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 21915
    • View Profile
Re: Amy Barrett Discussion Thread
« Reply #10 on: September 26, 2020, 09:31:52 PM »
Not having sought out any information on her, I just learned that she's been a judge for three years. Like, that's it. Three years.

Offline Kat Kid

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 20495
    • View Profile
Re: Amy Barrett Discussion Thread
« Reply #11 on: September 26, 2020, 09:44:42 PM »
Yeah she will be on the court until like 2050.

Offline Phil Titola

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 15296
  • He took it out!
    • View Profile
Re: Amy Barrett Discussion Thread
« Reply #12 on: September 26, 2020, 10:02:36 PM »
Trump just signed his ticket out of office.

Offline Dr Rick Daris

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 23383
    • View Profile
Re: Amy Barrett Discussion Thread
« Reply #13 on: September 26, 2020, 10:16:16 PM »
Yeah she will be on the court until like 2050.

I would be terrified to be a Supreme Court justice. I bet one gets shot within the next 20 years.

Online wetwillie

  • goEMAW Poster of the WEEK
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 30388
    • View Profile
Re: Amy Barrett Discussion Thread
« Reply #14 on: September 27, 2020, 06:28:23 AM »
Trump just signed his ticket out of office.

Holding a Supreme Court judge pick hostage wasn’t going to save him
When the bullets are flying, that's when I'm at my best

Offline chum1

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 21915
    • View Profile
Re: Amy Barrett Discussion Thread
« Reply #15 on: September 27, 2020, 12:36:53 PM »
Like, can we nominate someone who doesn't harbor a lifelong internal struggle with the concept of separation of church and state? Is that an option?

Offline Phil Titola

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 15296
  • He took it out!
    • View Profile
Re: Amy Barrett Discussion Thread
« Reply #16 on: September 27, 2020, 02:14:32 PM »
Trump just signed his ticket out of office.

Holding a Supreme Court judge pick hostage wasn’t going to save him
It was his hail mary IMO but I'm not very smart at these political games.

Offline kim carnes

  • chingon!
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 13558
    • View Profile
Re: Amy Barrett Discussion Thread
« Reply #17 on: September 27, 2020, 04:22:50 PM »
Like, can we nominate someone who doesn't harbor a lifelong internal struggle with the concept of separation of church and state? Is that an option?

Ya I don’t understand what they’re doing.  This nomination appeals to religious conservatives and hardcore republicans meanwhile republican candidates are losing elections left and right.  Like, shouldn’t you try at least a little to broaden your base?

Offline catastrophe

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 15214
    • View Profile
Re: Amy Barrett Discussion Thread
« Reply #18 on: September 28, 2020, 12:47:43 PM »
I've heard this and heard that the lower court's decision was so stupid it would be difficult to agree with.

https://twitter.com/ASlavitt/status/1309671290324877312
Don’t know anything about this opinion, but people need to not act like courts are responsible for maintaining the ACA. It’s a fact the law was pretty much gutted during the tax bill. Congress needs to fix it.

Offline Sandstone Outcropping

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 8670
  • a punk who rarely ever took advice
    • View Profile
Re: Amy Barrett Discussion Thread
« Reply #19 on: September 28, 2020, 01:15:34 PM »
I've heard this and heard that the lower court's decision was so stupid it would be difficult to agree with.

https://twitter.com/ASlavitt/status/1309671290324877312
Don’t know anything about this opinion, but people need to not act like courts are responsible for maintaining the ACA. It’s a fact the law was pretty much gutted during the tax bill. Congress needs to fix it.

Seems like it would "necessary and proper" for all citizens of a modern nation (especially one that is in the process of 'being made great again') to have access to health care. The fact that this hasn't been addressed in a rational way is exhibit A for how dysfunctional congress has become.

Offline schreds21

  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 1392
    • View Profile
Re: Amy Barrett Discussion Thread
« Reply #20 on: September 30, 2020, 07:57:49 PM »
https://m.facebook.com/?_rdr#!/CrenshawforCongress/photos/pcb.1272273743165370/1272272816498796/?type=3&source=48&refid=28&_ft_=qid.6878441816387870702%3Amf_story_key.4692668395008715616%3Atop_level_post_id.10158259701708645%3Acontent_owner_id_new.533903644%3Aoriginal_content_id.1272273743165370%3Aoriginal_content_owner_id.514167322309353%3Apage_id.514167322309353%3Asrc.22%3Aphoto_id.1272272736498804%3Astory_location.5%3Aattached_story_attachment_style.album%3Aview_time.1601511921%3Afilter.h_nor%3Atds_flgs.3%3Aott.AX_1R5I0Q9D76DE5%3Apage_insights.%7B%22514167322309353%22%3A%7B%22page_id%22%3A514167322309353%2C%22page_id_type%22%3A%22page%22%2C%22actor_id%22%3A533903644%2C%22attached_story%22%3A%7B%22page_id%22%3A514167322309353%2C%22page_id_type%22%3A%22page%22%2C%22actor_id%22%3A514167322309353%2C%22dm%22%3A%7B%22isShare%22%3A0%2C%22originalPostOwnerID%22%3A0%7D%2C%22psn%22%3A%22EntStatusCreationStory%22%2C%22post_context%22%3A%7B%22object_fbtype%22%3A266%2C%22publish_time%22%3A1601330636%2C%22story_name%22%3A%22EntStatusCreationStory%22%2C%22story_fbid%22%3A%5B1272273743165370%5D%7D%2C%22role%22%3A1%2C%22sl%22%3A5%7D%2C%22dm%22%3A%7B%22isShare%22%3A0%2C%22originalPostOwnerID%22%3A0%7D%2C%22psn%22%3A%22EntStatusCreationStory%22%2C%22role%22%3A1%2C%22sl%22%3A5%2C%22targets%22%3A%5B%7B%22actor_id%22%3A533903644%2C%22page_id%22%3A514167322309353%2C%22post_id%22%3A1272273743165370%2C%22role%22%3A1%2C%22share_id%22%3A0%7D%5D%7D%7D&__tn__=EHH-R
Wasn't sure where to put this.  Could probably go in about three different threads

Offline chum1

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 21915
    • View Profile
Re: Amy Barrett Discussion Thread
« Reply #21 on: October 01, 2020, 09:47:09 AM »

Offline bucket

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 9553
    • View Profile

Offline steve dave

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 85311
  • Romantic Fist Attachment
    • View Profile
Re: Amy Barrett Discussion Thread
« Reply #23 on: October 01, 2020, 11:33:57 AM »
holy crap, lmao


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Online wetwillie

  • goEMAW Poster of the WEEK
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 30388
    • View Profile
Re: Amy Barrett Discussion Thread
« Reply #24 on: October 01, 2020, 11:44:59 AM »
Man that is some elite spin
When the bullets are flying, that's when I'm at my best