2020 General Election Thread

[Dugout DickStone]

I can't believe Fox news keeps putting Pete on to destroy them.  If someone of his caliber is going on their network, he's locked and loaded

I don’t think Fox is uniformly pro Trump. They really could be putting Pete on to low key kick their own asses.

Fox self owns pretty often. 

[star seed 7]

He actually did very well as a nominee considering he entered as a mayor that nobody had heard of.

he failed to be nominated.

No, but he turned himself into someone who is more of a household name. He might even get a cabinet position. It would be foolish to not consider that a success.

And he's only 38!

[Institutional Control]

Pubs I know are pretty confident the polls are further off this year than in 2016.

[ChiComCat]

Pubs I know are pretty confident the polls are further off this year than in 2016.

Pubs better hope so

[wetwillie]

He actually did very well as a nominee considering he entered as a mayor that nobody had heard of.

he failed to be nominated.

No, but he turned himself into someone who is more of a household name. He might even get a cabinet position. It would be foolish to not consider that a success.

And he's only 38!

Damn he was barely old enough to run

[cfbandyman]

Pubs I know are pretty confident the polls are further off this year than in 2016.

Pubs better hope so

Really better hope so, it'd take a polling error twice as big as last time. He's getting his teeth kicked in the "have to win" states for him. He's got time to "fix" it, but that time is fast running out, and the polls have been so consistent for so long, it's hard to see it changing

[sys]

He actually did very well as a nominee considering he entered as a mayor that nobody had heard of.

he failed to be nominated.

No, but he turned himself into someone who is more of a household name. He might even get a cabinet position. It would be foolish to not consider that a success.

it was a successful candidacy.  just pointing out the semantics.

[sonofdaxjones]

Thanks to K-Street Stooge ChiCom Joe Biden for admitting he's going to pack the court.

Even while dodging (as usual) Joe Biden reveals the truth. 

We're not getting our way all the time, therefore we must change the rules (BidenVoter Nation)

[chum1]

Amazing analysis. Also super intersting given Trump's poll declines with seniors.

https://twitter.com/Redistrict/status/1314928887806267392

[sonofdaxjones]

Good of Nancy Pelosi to signal her intentions with the 25th amendment commission.

Congrats to future President Harris.

[michigancat]

Amazing analysis. Also super intersting given Trump's poll declines with seniors.

https://twitter.com/Redistrict/status/1314928887806267392

what a mumped up system

[LickNeckey]

K Street talking point being pushed hard by pubs on many platforms

[sonofdaxjones]

K- Street Stooge ChiCom Joe Biden says we don’t need to know his thoughts on court packing.

[LickNeckey]

agree with Joe on this one

[Cire]

What’s k Street


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[wetwillie]

What’s k Street


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

K Street is a major thoroughfare in the United States capital of Washington, D.C. known as a center for numerous lobbyists and advocacy groups

[Spracne]

agree with Joe on this one

I don't know how Joe will be able to evade the question all the way through election day. Jake Tapper (CNN) was roasting the Biden surrogate on his show this morning for being evasive about the question. The chyron (sp?) operator was even getting in on it.

[steve dave]

PAK it


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[star seed 7]

I don't think democrats have the balls so it doesn't matter

[sys]

I don't know how Joe will be able to evade the question all the way through election day. Jake Tapper (CNN) was roasting the Biden surrogate on his show this morning for being evasive about the question.

like most of the country i sat through that interview on the edge of my seat wondering if you biden would change his answer from "not gonna tell you" to "it depends" so i can finally figure out who i'm gonna vote for.

[chum1]

The issue is really, REALLY far down on the list of voters' concerns. I guess pubs are emphasizing it for the Roe v. Wade voters. ???

[Spracne]

I don't know how Joe will be able to evade the question all the way through election day. Jake Tapper (CNN) was roasting the Biden surrogate on his show this morning for being evasive about the question.

like most of the country i sat through that interview on the edge of my seat wondering if you biden would change his answer from "not gonna tell you" to "it depends" so i can finally figure out who i'm gonna vote for.

I'm willing to admit I probably care about the answer to that question far more than most. I'm just a bit irked, because it is literally the only question that has come up during the debates that I did not know Biden's position on, and it happens to be a question whose answer I care very deeply about. For me, it could make the difference between voting for Biden, voting third party, or simply not voting for President.

[michigancat]

I don't know how Joe will be able to evade the question all the way through election day. Jake Tapper (CNN) was roasting the Biden surrogate on his show this morning for being evasive about the question.

like most of the country i sat through that interview on the edge of my seat wondering if you biden would change his answer from "not gonna tell you" to "it depends" so i can finally figure out who i'm gonna vote for.

I'm willing to admit I probably care about the answer to that question far more than most. I'm just a bit irked, because it is literally the only question that has come up during the debates that I did not know Biden's position on, and it happens to be a question whose answer I care very deeply about. For me, it could make the difference between voting for Biden, voting third party, or simply not voting for President.

Glad you found your excuse

[Spracne]

I don't know how Joe will be able to evade the question all the way through election day. Jake Tapper (CNN) was roasting the Biden surrogate on his show this morning for being evasive about the question.

like most of the country i sat through that interview on the edge of my seat wondering if you biden would change his answer from "not gonna tell you" to "it depends" so i can finally figure out who i'm gonna vote for.

I'm willing to admit I probably care about the answer to that question far more than most. I'm just a bit irked, because it is literally the only question that has come up during the debates that I did not know Biden's position on, and it happens to be a question whose answer I care very deeply about. For me, it could make the difference between voting for Biden, voting third party, or simply not voting for President.

Glad you found your excuse

I guess you're entitled to your opinion on my motivations for how and why I choose to use my vote, but on the other hand, go eff yourself.

[sys]

For me, it could make the difference between voting for Biden, voting third party, or simply not voting for President.

spracne, the senate isn't going to pack the court because:  (see below).  biden doesn't want to articulate that for some reason, probably mostly because he thinks it can help apply some pressure on republican senators to not move the confirmation process along until after the election. hth.

https://twitter.com/AndrewSolender/status/1315366184364257280