Author Topic: Kansas Completely Irrelevant  (Read 23764 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline FHSU92

  • Combo-Fan
  • **
  • Posts: 570
    • View Profile
Re: Kansas Completely Irrelevant
« Reply #125 on: June 09, 2010, 12:19:44 PM »
All those Big 12 titles and nobody wants ku . . . poor Tardville.

Cue . . . more Bentard "perception is reality" . . . in 3, 2, 1 . . .






Plenty of conferences would love to have KU... it's just K-State Kansas that's holding us back. 


It's not K-State per se', it's just that there are 2 D1 programs in a rural state. Same can be said that KU is holding K-State back.  Fact is, KU fans won't really watch KU games and vice versa, so the # of TV's KU or KSU could sell is limited.  Amazing that you haven't figured that out yet, maybe you should listen more to what Seff has said the past few days.

Offline OregonSmock

  • Point Plank'r
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *
  • Posts: 8512
  • Mashing 'taters like an Old Country Buffet
    • View Profile
Re: Kansas Completely Irrelevant
« Reply #126 on: June 09, 2010, 12:22:10 PM »
All those Big 12 titles and nobody wants ku . . . poor Tardville.

Cue . . . more Bentard "perception is reality" . . . in 3, 2, 1 . . .






Plenty of conferences would love to have KU... it's just K-State Kansas that's holding us back. 


It's not K-State per se', it's just that there are 2 D1 programs in a rural state. Same can be said that KU is holding K-State back.  Fact is, KU fans won't really watch KU games and vice versa, so the # of TV's KU or KSU could sell is limited.  Amazing that you haven't figured that out yet, maybe you should listen more to what Seff has said the past few days.




Offline sonofdaxjones

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 59562
    • View Profile
Re: Kansas Completely Irrelevant
« Reply #127 on: June 09, 2010, 12:31:18 PM »
All those Big 12 titles and nobody wants ku . . . poor Tardville.

Cue . . . more Bentard "perception is reality" . . . in 3, 2, 1 . . .






Plenty of conferences would love to have KU... it's just K-State that's holding us back . . . and that's what we tell ourselves every night before we try and go to sleep . . . it makes us feel better

FYP


Offline OregonSmock

  • Point Plank'r
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *
  • Posts: 8512
  • Mashing 'taters like an Old Country Buffet
    • View Profile
Re: Kansas Completely Irrelevant
« Reply #128 on: June 09, 2010, 12:35:16 PM »
All those Big 12 titles and nobody wants ku . . . poor Tardville.

Cue . . . more Bentard "perception is reality" . . . in 3, 2, 1 . . .






Plenty of conferences would love to have KU... it's just K-State that's holding us back . . . and that's what we tell ourselves every night before we try and go to sleep . . . it makes us feel better

FYP






Offline sonofdaxjones

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 59562
    • View Profile
Re: Kansas Completely Irrelevant
« Reply #129 on: June 09, 2010, 12:36:38 PM »
Tap out noted . . . sad.


Offline bakerman

  • Big Salt Spokesperson
  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 1698
    • View Profile
Re: Kansas Completely Irrelevant
« Reply #130 on: June 09, 2010, 12:43:14 PM »
you have a lot of pictures of fat, bald, old guys holding giant fish..... Fetish?  :dunno:

Offline EMAWzified

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 4244
    • View Profile
Re: Kansas Completely Irrelevant
« Reply #131 on: June 09, 2010, 12:55:35 PM »
If by plenty of conferences, you mean Mountain West, Missouri Valley, Ohio Valley, etc. then yes.

Offline OregonSmock

  • Point Plank'r
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *
  • Posts: 8512
  • Mashing 'taters like an Old Country Buffet
    • View Profile
Re: Kansas Completely Irrelevant
« Reply #132 on: June 09, 2010, 01:01:47 PM »
If by plenty of conferences, you mean Mountain West, Missouri Valley, Ohio Valley, etc. then yes.



The Big East would take KU in a heartbeat.

Offline OK_Cat

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 16224
  • Hey
    • View Profile
Re: Kansas Completely Irrelevant
« Reply #133 on: June 09, 2010, 01:04:18 PM »
If by plenty of conferences, you mean Mountain West, Missouri Valley, Ohio Valley, etc. then yes.



The Big East would take KU in a heartbeat.

 :lol:   just face it, dude....KU is just as screwed as KSU in this whole thing.  The quicker you realize that, the easier it'll be on you.  Realignment is all about the # of tvs in the viewing area, and nobody gives a crap about Wichita/Topeka/Kansas City.   Neither school has anything to offer.

Offline Dugout DickStone

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 53907
  • BSPAC
    • View Profile
Re: Kansas Completely Irrelevant
« Reply #134 on: June 09, 2010, 01:10:18 PM »
If by plenty of conferences, you mean Mountain West, Missouri Valley, Ohio Valley, etc. then yes.



The Big East would take KU in a heartbeat.

LOL.  Another beems tall tale.

Offline CNS

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 38080
  • I'm Athletes
    • View Profile
Re: Kansas Completely Irrelevant
« Reply #135 on: June 09, 2010, 01:14:03 PM »
Seriously, am I the only one not hearing the rumors about conferences wanting KU? 

I don't know what is more entertaining, the crap made up in Lawrence lately, or the panic that is causing them to make the crap up.  Either way, it is entertaining as hell to watch.

Offline Dugout DickStone

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 53907
  • BSPAC
    • View Profile
Re: Kansas Completely Irrelevant
« Reply #136 on: June 09, 2010, 01:17:23 PM »
Seriously, am I the only one not hearing the rumors about conferences wanting KU? 

I don't know what is more entertaining, the crap made up in Lawrence lately, or the panic that is causing them to make the crap up.  Either way, it is entertaining as hell to watch.

Seriously.  Some dude jumped off the Oread he was so upset that the nation thinks so little of ku.  Getting mighty tense in Lawrence.

Offline EMAWzified

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 4244
    • View Profile
Re: Kansas Completely Irrelevant
« Reply #137 on: June 09, 2010, 01:22:12 PM »
When this is all over the Big East relevant as the Big 12.

Offline FHSU92

  • Combo-Fan
  • **
  • Posts: 570
    • View Profile
Re: Kansas Completely Irrelevant
« Reply #138 on: June 09, 2010, 01:38:38 PM »
Seriously, am I the only one not hearing the rumors about conferences wanting KU? 

I don't know what is more entertaining, the crap made up in Lawrence lately, or the panic that is causing them to make the crap up.  Either way, it is entertaining as hell to watch.

Seriously.  Some dude jumped off the Oread he was so upset that the nation thinks so little of ku.  Getting mighty tense in Lawrence.

Had to start killing themselves since all the homeless moved to Lincoln and Columbia.  The good part is is that homeless leaving does not affect our state TV #'s.

Offline OregonSmock

  • Point Plank'r
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *
  • Posts: 8512
  • Mashing 'taters like an Old Country Buffet
    • View Profile
Kietzman: BITB
« Reply #139 on: June 09, 2010, 02:57:55 PM »
Kietz just said that K-State's best chance of getting into a BCS conference, after everything shakes out, is to attach itself to KU.  He said that KU would most likely get interest from conferences like the Big East and ACC.  This is basically what I've been trying to tell you guys for the past week.



 :dunno:

Offline Rage Against the McKee

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 38010
    • View Profile
Re: Kietzman: BITB
« Reply #140 on: June 09, 2010, 02:59:08 PM »
Kietz just said that K-State's best chance of getting into a BCS conference, after everything shakes out, is to attach itself to KU.  He said that KU would most likely get interest from conferences like the Big East and ACC.  This is basically what I've been trying to tell you guys for the past week.



 :dunno:


Actually, you've been trying to tell us that we are already attached. This would imply that we are not.

Offline yosh

  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 1003
    • View Profile
Re: Kietzman: BITB
« Reply #141 on: June 09, 2010, 03:00:14 PM »
We're already in a BCS conference.   :dunno:

Offline OregonSmock

  • Point Plank'r
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *
  • Posts: 8512
  • Mashing 'taters like an Old Country Buffet
    • View Profile
Re: Kietzman: BITB
« Reply #142 on: June 09, 2010, 03:04:04 PM »
Kietzman:  "I think Kansas and Missouri have a really good chance of catching on somewhere, but K-State might be on the bubble.  Their best bet is to attach themselves to Kansas."
 


:surprised:

Offline Cire

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 20631
    • View Profile
Re: Kansas Completely Irrelevant
« Reply #143 on: June 09, 2010, 03:09:28 PM »
Yeah kk said the opposite of what beems has been saying

Offline DOOMsday

  • Combo-Fan
  • **
  • Posts: 370
    • View Profile
Re: Kietzman: BITB
« Reply #144 on: June 09, 2010, 03:11:09 PM »
Kietzman:  "I think Kansas and Missouri have a really good chance of catching on somewhere, but K-State might be on the bubble.  Their best bet is to attach themselves to Kansas."
 


:surprised:


If the perception is that KSU is a package deal with ku, wouldn't they also believe that we run the same kind of corrupt program?

Perception is reality, am I right?

Offline EllToPay

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 5174
  • Typical EMAW
    • View Profile
Re: Kietzman: BITB
« Reply #145 on: June 09, 2010, 03:12:54 PM »
Kietz just said that K-State's best chance of getting into a BCS conference, after everything shakes out, is to attach itself to KU.  He said that KU would most likely get interest from conferences like the Big East and ACC.  This is basically what I've been trying to tell you guys for the past week.



 :dunno:


you would get absolutely destroyed every year in the acc.

Offline sonofdaxjones

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 59562
    • View Profile
Re: Kansas Completely Irrelevant
« Reply #146 on: June 09, 2010, 03:20:11 PM »
So tardville makes fun of everything that Keitzman says . . . then Keitzman (who doesn't really know $hit when it comes to K-State) says that about K-State's "best bet" and Tardville's chief parrot runs over here with it.

Classic.


Offline Brock Landers

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 7241
    • View Profile
Re: Kietzman: BITB
« Reply #147 on: June 09, 2010, 03:23:08 PM »
Kietz just said that K-State's best chance of getting into a BCS conference, after everything shakes out, is to attach itself to KU.  He said that KU would most likely get interest from conferences like the Big East and ACC.  This is basically what I've been trying to tell you guys for the past week.



 :dunno:



I thought all you Tardville guys hated Kietzman.  Now you're listening to his show, believing everything he says, and quoting him on a KSU message board??   This, my friends is exactly why Kietz is the BITB.

Offline LickNeckey

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 7076
  • #fakeposts
    • View Profile
Re: Kansas Completely Irrelevant
« Reply #148 on: June 09, 2010, 03:26:19 PM »
let KU go to the Big East/ACC 1 Ben will be able to move on with his life and not have to spend all of his free time reminding us that we are not rivals besides....

MWC > ACC imo

football is driving all of this remember nobody gives a hullabaloo about hoops (talking to you ACC/Big East)

TCU
Houston
Boise
Utah
BYU
KSU
Colorado (when PAC 10 takes baylor to get the tejas sisterhood)
CSU
Nevada

these teams as a football core would be just as strong as anything offered by Big East/ACC

Offline mcmwcat

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 5313
  • trips: "MCMW"
    • View Profile
Re: Kansas Completely Irrelevant
« Reply #149 on: June 09, 2010, 03:35:26 PM »
Yeah kk said the opposite of what beems has been saying

boom 

who cares less about their credibility BMWJhawk or BITB?  mods should change BMWJhawk's handle to BITBJhawk.

love ya beems.  you and royalswild
« Last Edit: June 09, 2010, 03:37:09 PM by mcmwcat »