Author Topic: Kansas Completely Irrelevant  (Read 18758 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline steve dave

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 85520
  • Romantic Fist Attachment
    • View Profile
Kansas Completely Irrelevant
« on: June 07, 2010, 11:05:30 AM »


(Want to get rid of the ad? Register now for free!)

Online michigancat

  • Contributor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 53948
  • change your stupid avatar.
    • View Profile
Re: Kansas Completely Irrelevant
« Reply #1 on: June 07, 2010, 11:08:18 AM »
:lol:

Offline WillieWatanabe

  • PCKK7DC Survivor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *******
  • Posts: 19319
  • We'll always have Salt Lake
    • View Profile
Re: Kansas Completely Irrelevant
« Reply #2 on: June 07, 2010, 11:14:03 AM »
BLASPHEMY!!!!
Sometimes I think of the Book of Job and how God likes to really eff with people.
- chunkles

Offline ltrain

  • Combo-Fan
  • **
  • Posts: 256
  • go cats
    • View Profile
Re: Kansas Completely Irrelevant
« Reply #3 on: June 07, 2010, 11:16:01 AM »
Quote
Would that lead to Kansas in the ACC?

Or the Mountain West?

(If it's the latter, good look turning a big profit by scalping stolen league tournament tickets.)


 :lol:
Wondering who is running this hot dog stand and seriously considering heading out for tacos.

Offline KITNfury

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 7109
  • Eat My Ass Whole
    • View Profile
Re: Kansas Completely Irrelevant
« Reply #4 on: June 07, 2010, 11:47:09 AM »
All a lie. They aren't being looked at seriously because of us.
I once blew clove smoke in a guy's face that cut in front of me in the line to KJ's.

Online nicname

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 15934
  • Deal with it.
    • View Profile
Re: Kansas Completely Irrelevant
« Reply #5 on: June 07, 2010, 12:37:29 PM »
Listen Steve, KU is a basketball blue-blood, an AAU member, a tier 1 suniversity and one of the haves in college athletics.  KU is the flagship university in the state of Kansas and carries national brand appeal.  Not to mention recent success(2008 Orange Bowl) in football and anyone can see that KU is a sleeping giant.  With KSU out of the way and in mid-major land Memorial Stadium will be expanded to 75,000 seats and KU will show true might!  But that will never happens because KU is tied to KSU :curse:
If there was a gif of nicname thwarting the attempted-flag-taker and then gesturing him to suck it, followed by motioning for all of Hilton Shelter to boo him louder, it'd be better than that auburn gif.

Offline bakerman

  • Big Salt Spokesperson
  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 1698
    • View Profile
Re: Kansas Completely Irrelevant
« Reply #6 on: June 07, 2010, 12:48:32 PM »
Quote
Would that lead to Kansas in the ACC?

Or the Mountain West?

(If it's the latter, good look turning a big profit by scalping stolen league tournament tickets.)


 :lol:


This part of the article made my coworkers look weirdly at me for laughing so loud....

Offline OregonSmock

  • Point Plank'r
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *
  • Posts: 8512
  • Mashing 'taters like an Old Country Buffet
    • View Profile
Re: Kansas Completely Irrelevant
« Reply #7 on: June 07, 2010, 01:23:44 PM »
http://frankthetank.wordpress.com/2010/04/19/the-value-of-expansion-candidates-to-the-big-ten-network/


CANDIDATES   TOTAL ADDED REVENUE ESTIMATE
    
Texas   $101,369,004
Rutgers    WITH NYC   $67,798,609
Nebraska   $54,487,990
Maryland   $50,818,889
Boston College   $48,382,692
Notre Dame   $47,629,255
Kansas   $46,320,092
Missouri   $45,901,459
Syracuse   $43,504,813
Connecticut   $38,080,271
Pittsburgh   $34,365,175
Iowa State   $31,831,077
    
Syracuse  WITH NYC   $65,874,573

Offline Pete

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 29432
  • T-Shirt KSU Football Fan, Loves Lawrence and KU
    • View Profile
Re: Kansas Completely Irrelevant
« Reply #8 on: June 07, 2010, 01:27:23 PM »
http://frankthetank.wordpress.com/2010/04/19/the-value-of-expansion-candidates-to-the-big-ten-network/


CANDIDATES   TOTAL ADDED REVENUE ESTIMATE
    
Texas   $101,369,004
Rutgers    WITH NYC   $67,798,609
Nebraska   $54,487,990
Maryland   $50,818,889
Boston College   $48,382,692
Notre Dame   $47,629,255
Kansas   $46,320,092
Missouri   $45,901,459
Syracuse   $43,504,813
Connecticut   $38,080,271
Pittsburgh   $34,365,175
Iowa State   $31,831,077
    
Syracuse  WITH NYC   $65,874,573


I'm gonna go with Gary Parrish over frankthetank, Beams.

Offline CNS

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 36809
  • I'm Athletes
    • View Profile
Re: Kansas Completely Irrelevant
« Reply #9 on: June 07, 2010, 01:32:30 PM »
KU is the girl who's dad told her she was pretty her whole life.  Then the girl goes to college and has no one telling her she is pretty any more other than when she is on the phone with dad. 

KU, daddy(JoCo) still loves you.  Just remember that. 

Who cares that you have no one asking you out.  Daddy says if they aren't giving you attention, they aren't good enough anyway.


Offline Dr Rick Daris

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 23383
    • View Profile
Re: Kansas Completely Irrelevant
« Reply #10 on: June 07, 2010, 01:43:45 PM »
http://frankthetank.wordpress.com/2010/04/19/the-value-of-expansion-candidates-to-the-big-ten-network/


CANDIDATES   TOTAL ADDED REVENUE ESTIMATE
    
Texas   $101,369,004
Rutgers    WITH NYC   $67,798,609
Nebraska   $54,487,990
Maryland   $50,818,889
Boston College   $48,382,692
Notre Dame   $47,629,255
Kansas   $46,320,092
Missouri   $45,901,459
Syracuse   $43,504,813
Connecticut   $38,080,271
Pittsburgh   $34,365,175
Iowa State   $31,831,077
    
Syracuse  WITH NYC   $65,874,573

so kansas is 8th on the list? maybe the big 10 will expand to 20 or 25 ku gets in afterall.

Offline Pete

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 29432
  • T-Shirt KSU Football Fan, Loves Lawrence and KU
    • View Profile
Re: Kansas Completely Irrelevant
« Reply #11 on: June 07, 2010, 01:46:46 PM »
http://frankthetank.wordpress.com/2010/04/19/the-value-of-expansion-candidates-to-the-big-ten-network/


CANDIDATES   TOTAL ADDED REVENUE ESTIMATE
    
Texas   $101,369,004
Rutgers    WITH NYC   $67,798,609
Nebraska   $54,487,990
Maryland   $50,818,889
Boston College   $48,382,692
Notre Dame   $47,629,255
Kansas   $46,320,092
Missouri   $45,901,459
Syracuse   $43,504,813
Connecticut   $38,080,271
Pittsburgh   $34,365,175
Iowa State   $31,831,077
    
Syracuse  WITH NYC   $65,874,573

so kansas is 8th on the list? maybe the big 10 will expand to 20 or 25 ku gets in afterall.

7th on the list, you rough ridin' jackass. 

Offline pissclams

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 46710
  • (worst non-premium poster at goEMAW.com)
    • View Profile
Re: Kansas Completely Irrelevant
« Reply #12 on: June 07, 2010, 01:48:43 PM »
http://frankthetank.wordpress.com/2010/04/19/the-value-of-expansion-candidates-to-the-big-ten-network/


CANDIDATES   TOTAL ADDED REVENUE ESTIMATE
    
Texas   $101,369,004
Rutgers    WITH NYC   $67,798,609
Nebraska   $54,487,990
Maryland   $50,818,889
Boston College   $48,382,692
Notre Dame   $47,629,255
Kansas   $46,320,092
Missouri   $45,901,459
Syracuse   $43,504,813
Connecticut   $38,080,271
Pittsburgh   $34,365,175
Iowa State   $31,831,077
    
Syracuse  WITH NYC   $65,874,573
a school's total revenue really is immaterial to the discussion. i know you think it's important, because it gives you something to believe in but the truth is that an athletic dept's revenue doesn't mean squat.  it's television sets that matter here broseph and ku, despite what they've told themselves all these years, is still in kansas.
« Last Edit: June 07, 2010, 01:51:57 PM by pissclams »


Cheesy Mustache QB might make an appearance.

New warning: Don't get in a fight with someone who doesn't even need to bother to buy ink.

Offline Trim

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 42030
  • Pfizer PLUS Moderna and now Pfizer Bivalent
    • View Profile
Re: Kansas Completely Irrelevant
« Reply #13 on: June 07, 2010, 01:49:07 PM »
7th on the list, you rough ridin' jackass.  

8th if including Syracuse WITH NYC.  Either way, warm up the banner-hanging, motherfuckers!

Offline Dr Rick Daris

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 23383
    • View Profile
Re: Kansas Completely Irrelevant
« Reply #14 on: June 07, 2010, 01:49:31 PM »
http://frankthetank.wordpress.com/2010/04/19/the-value-of-expansion-candidates-to-the-big-ten-network/


CANDIDATES   TOTAL ADDED REVENUE ESTIMATE
    
Texas   $101,369,004
Rutgers    WITH NYC   $67,798,609
Nebraska   $54,487,990
Maryland   $50,818,889
Boston College   $48,382,692
Notre Dame   $47,629,255
Kansas   $46,320,092
Missouri   $45,901,459
Syracuse   $43,504,813
Connecticut   $38,080,271
Pittsburgh   $34,365,175
Iowa State   $31,831,077
    
Syracuse  WITH NYC   $65,874,573

so kansas is 8th on the list? maybe the big 10 will expand to 20 or 25 ku gets in afterall.

7th on the list, you fracking jackass. 

i don't know man. unless i'm reading it wrong (which i might be because i can't follow the link at work) it looks like syracuse should be up above ku at 65,874,573 WITH NYC or whatever that means. i do agree w/ the bmw premise that if the big10 expands to 20 or 30 teams that ku will probably be one of them.  

Offline OregonSmock

  • Point Plank'r
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *
  • Posts: 8512
  • Mashing 'taters like an Old Country Buffet
    • View Profile
Re: Kansas Completely Irrelevant
« Reply #15 on: June 07, 2010, 01:52:09 PM »
http://frankthetank.wordpress.com/2010/04/19/the-value-of-expansion-candidates-to-the-big-ten-network/


CANDIDATES   TOTAL ADDED REVENUE ESTIMATE
    
Texas   $101,369,004
Rutgers    WITH NYC   $67,798,609
Nebraska   $54,487,990
Maryland   $50,818,889
Boston College   $48,382,692
Notre Dame   $47,629,255
Kansas   $46,320,092
Missouri   $45,901,459
Syracuse   $43,504,813
Connecticut   $38,080,271
Pittsburgh   $34,365,175
Iowa State   $31,831,077
    
Syracuse  WITH NYC   $65,874,573
a school's total revenue really is immaterial to the discussion. i know you think it's important, because it gives you something to believe it but the truth is that an athletic dept's revenue doesn't mean squat.  it's television sets that matter here broseph and ku, despite what they've told themselves all these years, is still in kansas.



It's a total added revenue estimate, not the school's athletic revenue.  In other words, KU would add ~46 million to the Big 10. 

Offline Poster formerly known as jthutch

  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 1765
    • View Profile
Re: Kansas Completely Irrelevant
« Reply #16 on: June 07, 2010, 01:55:22 PM »
http://frankthetank.wordpress.com/2010/04/19/the-value-of-expansion-candidates-to-the-big-ten-network/


CANDIDATES   TOTAL ADDED REVENUE ESTIMATE
    
Texas   $101,369,004
Rutgers    WITH NYC   $67,798,609
Nebraska   $54,487,990
Maryland   $50,818,889
Boston College   $48,382,692
Notre Dame   $47,629,255
Kansas   $46,320,092
Missouri   $45,901,459
Syracuse   $43,504,813
Connecticut   $38,080,271
Pittsburgh   $34,365,175
Iowa State   $31,831,077
    
Syracuse  WITH NYC   $65,874,573
a school's total revenue really is immaterial to the discussion. i know you think it's important, because it gives you something to believe in but the truth is that an athletic dept's revenue doesn't mean squat.  it's television sets that matter here broseph and ku, despite what they've told themselves all these years, is still in kansas.

This and with the ticket scalping crap that is going on I doubt the validity of the the sell out crowds.

Offline Trim

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 42030
  • Pfizer PLUS Moderna and now Pfizer Bivalent
    • View Profile
Re: Kansas Completely Irrelevant
« Reply #17 on: June 07, 2010, 01:57:23 PM »
http://frankthetank.wordpress.com/2010/04/19/the-value-of-expansion-candidates-to-the-big-ten-network/


CANDIDATES   TOTAL ADDED REVENUE ESTIMATE
    
Texas   $101,369,004
Rutgers    WITH NYC   $67,798,609
Nebraska   $54,487,990
Maryland   $50,818,889
Boston College   $48,382,692
Notre Dame   $47,629,255
Kansas   $46,320,092
Missouri   $45,901,459
Syracuse   $43,504,813
Connecticut   $38,080,271
Pittsburgh   $34,365,175
Iowa State   $31,831,077
    
Syracuse  WITH NYC   $65,874,573
a school's total revenue really is immaterial to the discussion. i know you think it's important, because it gives you something to believe it but the truth is that an athletic dept's revenue doesn't mean squat.  it's television sets that matter here broseph and ku, despite what they've told themselves all these years, is still in kansas.



It's a total added revenue estimate, not the school's athletic revenue.  In other words, KU would add ~46 million to the Big 10.  








 :love:

Offline Dr Rick Daris

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 23383
    • View Profile
Re: Kansas Completely Irrelevant
« Reply #18 on: June 07, 2010, 02:00:49 PM »
i agree w/ bmw here. out of the 11 schools listed, ku is probably 8th or 9th on the big10's list.

Offline WillieWatanabe

  • PCKK7DC Survivor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *******
  • Posts: 19319
  • We'll always have Salt Lake
    • View Profile
Re: Kansas Completely Irrelevant
« Reply #19 on: June 07, 2010, 02:04:43 PM »
http://frankthetank.wordpress.com/2010/04/19/the-value-of-expansion-candidates-to-the-big-ten-network/


CANDIDATES   TOTAL ADDED REVENUE ESTIMATE
    
Texas   $101,369,004
Rutgers    WITH NYC   $67,798,609
Nebraska   $54,487,990
Maryland   $50,818,889
Boston College   $48,382,692
Notre Dame   $47,629,255
Kansas   $46,320,092
Missouri   $45,901,459
Syracuse   $43,504,813
Connecticut   $38,080,271
Pittsburgh   $34,365,175
Iowa State   $31,831,077
    
Syracuse  WITH NYC   $65,874,573
a school's total revenue really is immaterial to the discussion. i know you think it's important, because it gives you something to believe it but the truth is that an athletic dept's revenue doesn't mean squat.  it's television sets that matter here broseph and ku, despite what they've told themselves all these years, is still in kansas.



It's a total added revenue estimate, not the school's athletic revenue.  In other words, KU would add ~46 million to the Big 10.  




Quote from: Patrick (aka FrankTheTank Wannabe) (aka chart guru)
If anyone wants to pass along better or more current numbers, I would appreciate it.

 :flush: :flush:
« Last Edit: June 07, 2010, 02:09:37 PM by WillieWannabe »
Sometimes I think of the Book of Job and how God likes to really eff with people.
- chunkles

Offline pissclams

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 46710
  • (worst non-premium poster at goEMAW.com)
    • View Profile
Re: Kansas Completely Irrelevant
« Reply #20 on: June 07, 2010, 02:07:23 PM »
http://frankthetank.wordpress.com/2010/04/19/the-value-of-expansion-candidates-to-the-big-ten-network/


CANDIDATES   TOTAL ADDED REVENUE ESTIMATE
    
Texas   $101,369,004
Rutgers    WITH NYC   $67,798,609
Nebraska   $54,487,990
Maryland   $50,818,889
Boston College   $48,382,692
Notre Dame   $47,629,255
Kansas   $46,320,092
Missouri   $45,901,459
Syracuse   $43,504,813
Connecticut   $38,080,271
Pittsburgh   $34,365,175
Iowa State   $31,831,077
    
Syracuse  WITH NYC   $65,874,573
a school's total revenue really is immaterial to the discussion. i know you think it's important, because it gives you something to believe it but the truth is that an athletic dept's revenue doesn't mean squat.  it's television sets that matter here broseph and ku, despite what they've told themselves all these years, is still in kansas.



It's a total added revenue estimate, not the school's athletic revenue.  In other words, KU would add ~46 million to the Big 10. 
got it- sorry for not reading the link.  over at Phog the guys seem to be relying heavily on the AD's revenue as if it matters.


Cheesy Mustache QB might make an appearance.

New warning: Don't get in a fight with someone who doesn't even need to bother to buy ink.

Offline get_HIT

  • Combo-Fan
  • **
  • Posts: 605
  • "I just love the Jayhawk...It should be killed."
    • View Profile
Re: Kansas Completely Irrelevant
« Reply #21 on: June 07, 2010, 02:59:46 PM »
 :users:
"He was in the group of about four or five troll K-State fans who were celebrating like they had just won a national title." -BMW on get_HIT

Offline sonofdaxjones

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 53781
    • View Profile
Re: Kansas Completely Irrelevant
« Reply #22 on: June 07, 2010, 03:04:17 PM »
Who can trust ku's athletic revenues anyway . . . nearly everyplace you can go find out about revenues for athletic departments has different numbers for ku . . . they're all over the map, they are also ALWAYS the last BCS conference school to have their DOE Equity in Athletics financial numbers updated.   THe USA Today FOIA information doesn't match what they submitted to the DOE for their EADA reports and the respective fiscal years. 

Offline john "teach me how to" dougie

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 7661
  • 1cat
    • View Profile
Re: Kansas Completely Irrelevant
« Reply #23 on: June 07, 2010, 03:15:37 PM »
I know Missourians are a bunch of meth heads that steal TVs rather than watch them, but how does KU generate more cable ad dollars than Missouri?

Offline OregonSmock

  • Point Plank'r
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *
  • Posts: 8512
  • Mashing 'taters like an Old Country Buffet
    • View Profile
Re: Kansas Completely Irrelevant
« Reply #24 on: June 07, 2010, 03:19:19 PM »
Who can trust ku's athletic revenues anyway . . . nearly everyplace you can go find out about revenues for athletic departments has different numbers for ku . . . they're all over the map, they are also ALWAYS the last BCS conference school to have their DOE Equity in Athletics financial numbers updated.   THe USA Today FOIA information doesn't match what they submitted to the DOE for their EADA reports and the respective fiscal years. 



If anything, KU's athletic revenue is underestimated because of the opportunity cost missed on all of those "complimentary" tickets.