0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Yep it escaped from a lab
it's been moderately well established that the virus did not pass into humans at the wet market in wuhan, if that matters to people's wet market takes.
What's the leading theory now, bat to cow to human or something?
Quote from: sys on August 11, 2020, 04:50:41 PMit's been moderately well established that the virus did not pass into humans at the wet market in wuhan, if that matters to people's wet market takes.What's the leading theory now, bat to cow to human or something?
So aerosols, thought the below snippet was interesting, but could have been few enough that it wasn't an infectious dose. QuoteThe room had six air changes per hour and was fitted with efficient filters, ultraviolet irradiation and other safety measures to inactivate the virus before the air was reintroduced into the room. The New York Times: ‘A Smoking Gun’: Infectious Coronavirus Retrieved From Hospital Air.https://www.nytimes.com/2020/08/11/health/coronavirus-aerosols-indoors.html
The room had six air changes per hour and was fitted with efficient filters, ultraviolet irradiation and other safety measures to inactivate the virus before the air was reintroduced into the room.
Quote from: memphis on August 11, 2020, 05:27:01 PMSo aerosols, thought the below snippet was interesting, but could have been few enough that it wasn't an infectious dose. QuoteThe room had six air changes per hour and was fitted with efficient filters, ultraviolet irradiation and other safety measures to inactivate the virus before the air was reintroduced into the room. The New York Times: ‘A Smoking Gun’: Infectious Coronavirus Retrieved From Hospital Air.https://www.nytimes.com/2020/08/11/health/coronavirus-aerosols-indoors.htmlImportant read for people who think keeping kids six feet apart indoors at schools will prevent the spread
I thought it was bat to butcherSent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Quote from: michigancat on August 11, 2020, 06:02:16 PMQuote from: memphis on August 11, 2020, 05:27:01 PMSo aerosols, thought the below snippet was interesting, but could have been few enough that it wasn't an infectious dose. QuoteThe room had six air changes per hour and was fitted with efficient filters, ultraviolet irradiation and other safety measures to inactivate the virus before the air was reintroduced into the room. The New York Times: ‘A Smoking Gun’: Infectious Coronavirus Retrieved From Hospital Air.https://www.nytimes.com/2020/08/11/health/coronavirus-aerosols-indoors.htmlImportant read for people who think keeping kids six feet apart indoors at schools will prevent the spreadStill an important final question. “I’m just not sure that these numbers are high enough to cause an infection in somebody,” said Angela Rasmussen, a virologist at Columbia University in New York.Being able to harvest it out of the air does seem big but is it enough to make anybody sick?
Quote from: Phil Titola on August 11, 2020, 06:39:02 PMQuote from: michigancat on August 11, 2020, 06:02:16 PMQuote from: memphis on August 11, 2020, 05:27:01 PMSo aerosols, thought the below snippet was interesting, but could have been few enough that it wasn't an infectious dose. QuoteThe room had six air changes per hour and was fitted with efficient filters, ultraviolet irradiation and other safety measures to inactivate the virus before the air was reintroduced into the room. The New York Times: ‘A Smoking Gun’: Infectious Coronavirus Retrieved From Hospital Air.https://www.nytimes.com/2020/08/11/health/coronavirus-aerosols-indoors.htmlImportant read for people who think keeping kids six feet apart indoors at schools will prevent the spreadStill an important final question. “I’m just not sure that these numbers are high enough to cause an infection in somebody,” said Angela Rasmussen, a virologist at Columbia University in New York.Being able to harvest it out of the air does seem big but is it enough to make anybody sick?Yeah it seems similar to how everyone was wiping down Amazon boxes with bleach at the beginning cause they determined it could survive like 3 days on cardboard. Finding a live virus is not the same thing as identifying an actual infection risk.
Quote from: catastrophe on August 11, 2020, 07:21:32 PMQuote from: Phil Titola on August 11, 2020, 06:39:02 PMQuote from: michigancat on August 11, 2020, 06:02:16 PMQuote from: memphis on August 11, 2020, 05:27:01 PMSo aerosols, thought the below snippet was interesting, but could have been few enough that it wasn't an infectious dose. QuoteThe room had six air changes per hour and was fitted with efficient filters, ultraviolet irradiation and other safety measures to inactivate the virus before the air was reintroduced into the room. The New York Times: ‘A Smoking Gun’: Infectious Coronavirus Retrieved From Hospital Air.https://www.nytimes.com/2020/08/11/health/coronavirus-aerosols-indoors.htmlImportant read for people who think keeping kids six feet apart indoors at schools will prevent the spreadStill an important final question. “I’m just not sure that these numbers are high enough to cause an infection in somebody,” said Angela Rasmussen, a virologist at Columbia University in New York.Being able to harvest it out of the air does seem big but is it enough to make anybody sick?Yeah it seems similar to how everyone was wiping down Amazon boxes with bleach at the beginning cause they determined it could survive like 3 days on cardboard. Finding a live virus is not the same thing as identifying an actual infection risk.Based on stories of superspreading events it seems reasonable one of those superspreder people could be spreading it beyond the 6 feet, I just am not sure it's very common or we'd see a higher reproductive value and/or more people would be sick. Maybe this is the cause of more asymptomic/mildly symptomatic people? Like masks that they are thinking causes the wearer to suck less of this down their lungs and get less sick?JB Handley says it's over in a couple weeks anyways, play ball!
This guy may be a twitter doc quack but with the recent news of possible t-cell cross immune reaction, it gives support to the 20% herd immunity figure. https://twitter.com/JamesTodaroMD/status/1292873236716433416
speaking of, all this worry about the flu and a second wave coming this winter, shouldn't the precautions that seem we'll have in place the rest of 2020 take the knees out of the flu?
Quote from: Phil Titola on August 11, 2020, 09:28:44 PMThis guy may be a twitter doc quack but with the recent news of possible t-cell cross immune reaction, it gives support to the 20% herd immunity figure. https://twitter.com/JamesTodaroMD/status/1292873236716433416i thought we'd been over this, phil.