CoronaBro Meltdown/SARS-Covid-19 Spitballing Thread

[sonofdaxjones]

"This is their new hoax" 

As in Dems were politicizing the virus and trying to say Trump wasn't taking it seriously. 

This has been explained many times.

But Useful Idiot gonna Useful Idiot

At no point in the rally did Trump directly call the novel coronavirus outbreak a “hoax” or “conspiracy.” In fact, he referred to the respiratory virus as a “public health threat” and reiterated that “we have to take it very, very seriously. That’s what we’re doing. We are preparing for the worst.”

https://www.dailysignal.com/2020/03/02/fact-check-did-trump-call-coronavirus-a-hoax/

[sonofdaxjones]

The lead guy said repeatedly we had nothing to worry about at the end of January.

The WHO (before we really understood they were lying) was saying the exact same thing (and Dems were parroting it as well) . . . even into Feb saying it was perfectly fine to be traveling to China.

Why anyone supports the WHO"s Maoist leader I'll never know.

That was a briefing from February 27.

LOL, we have at least 5,000% more knowledge about this thing then existed back then. 

This is what we call "on the fly switching"

I'm starting to put on the same level as Super Slow Dug

That doesn't make any sense little coward.

You're both indistinguishable in your idiocy (and rage) at this point.

Super Slow Dug, Useful Idiot.9, Just Phil . . . all the same person 

[star seed 7]

So he was taking it seriously while saying it's a hoax? That's a bit of a stretch even for Herr dax of the trump propaganda defense league.

[Dugout DickStone]

Is extreme cowardice a symptom of dementia like being unable to coherently express an idea is?

[sonofdaxjones]

So he was taking it seriously while saying it's a hoax? That's a bit of a stretch even for Herr dax of the trump propaganda defense league.

He was calling the Democratic response in him not taking it seriously a hoax.   

You obviously didn't read the article I posted, because it runs counter to what your leaders tell you to believe and to say, like a little parrot boy.

Useful Idiot:  Thy name is LibDork .9

SMDH, sad

[sonofdaxjones]

Is extreme cowardice a symptom of dementia like being unable to coherently express an idea is?

You have to talk slow and use little words with Super Slow Dug

[Phil Titola]

So he was taking it seriously while saying it's a hoax? That's a bit of a stretch even for Herr dax of the trump propaganda defense league.

He was calling the Democratic response in him not taking it seriously a hoax.   

You obviously didn't read the article I posted, because it runs counter to what your leaders tell you to believe and to say, like a little parrot boy.

Useful Idiot:  Thy name is LibDork .9

SMDH, sad

I think we can all agree it was not a good run of words together for him, but that's no different than any of his rallies.  His followers don't really care what he says anyways. 

He has way bigger sins in this COVID-19 vent than using the word hoax at a rally, we can all agree with that.

[star seed 7]

So he was taking it seriously, but people who said he wasn't were hoaxing but then he repeatedly made statements afterwards that made it obvious he wasn't taking 'rona seriously so actually the hoax'rs were not hoaxing?

Some complicated stuff there dax, but I think we are approaching common ground.

[sonofdaxjones]

So he was taking it seriously while saying it's a hoax? That's a bit of a stretch even for Herr dax of the trump propaganda defense league.

He was calling the Democratic response in him not taking it seriously a hoax.   

You obviously didn't read the article I posted, because it runs counter to what your leaders tell you to believe and to say, like a little parrot boy.

Useful Idiot:  Thy name is LibDork .9

SMDH, sad

I think we can all agree it was not a good run of words together for him, but that's no different than any of his rallies.  His followers don't really care what he says anyways. 

He has way bigger sins in this COVID-19 vent than using the word hoax at a rally, we can all agree with that.

He should uh ah uh ah stay on Teleprompter more like his predecessor that's ah uh uh, for ah ah sure.

[star seed 7]

I was just thinking today how we haven't had a good uh uh uh Obama post in a while and wondered how long before the algo spit it out.

[sonofdaxjones]

So he was taking it seriously, but people who said he wasn't were hoaxing but then he repeatedly made statements afterwards that made it obvious he wasn't taking 'rona seriously so actually the hoax'rs were not hoaxing?

Some complicated stuff there dax, but I think we are approaching common ground.

Useful Idiots get confused easily have trouble understanding things.

I will say this, you're an outstanding parrot boy for your movement.  Even though your movement hates you.

[Bqqkie Pimp]

I know a lot of you want to subject yourself to testing, however two of the three labs making test kits were infecting them with the virus.

What a three ring circus this whole thing has turned out to be.

https://twitter.com/TruthHammer888/status/1252627671021834240

[sonofdaxjones]

I know a lot of you want to subject yourself to testing, however two of the three labs making test kits were infecting them with the virus.

What a three ring circus this whole thing has turned out to be.

https://twitter.com/TruthHammer888/status/1252627671021834240

How long has the CDC been contracting with those labs, Book?

[chum1]

It might be hard for people understand the point that Trump was taking it seriously because (1) he never once acted in a way that someone who was taking it seriously would act, (2) always acted in ways that are opposite of how someone who was taking it seriously would act, and (3) always acted in ways that someone who did not take it seriously would act.

[sonofdaxjones]

It might be hard for people understand the point that Trump was taking it seriously because (1) he never once acted in a way that someone who was taking it seriously would act, (2) always acted in ways that are opposite of how someone who was taking it seriously would act, and (3) always acted in ways that someone who did not take it seriously would act.

If he would have taken the FearPorn TV route back then you would have just said he's trying to deflect from the impeachment.

'Grats on being able to play both sides of the coin at the same time, Chum

[bucket]

I know a lot of you want to subject yourself to testing, however two of the three labs making test kits were infecting them with the virus.

What a three ring circus this whole thing has turned out to be.

https://twitter.com/TruthHammer888/status/1252627671021834240

Did they do it on purpose or by accident?

[chum1]

It might be hard for people understand the point that Trump was taking it seriously because (1) he never once acted in a way that someone who was taking it seriously would act, (2) always acted in ways that are opposite of how someone who was taking it seriously would act, and (3) always acted in ways that someone who did not take it seriously would act.

If he would have taken the FearPorn TV route back then you would have just said he's trying to deflect from the impeachment.

Trump was acquitted on 2/5.

[star seed 7]

It might be hard for people understand the point that Trump was taking it seriously because (1) he never once acted in a way that someone who was taking it seriously would act, (2) always acted in ways that are opposite of how someone who was taking it seriously would act, and (3) always acted in ways that someone who did not take it seriously would act.

If he would have taken the FearPorn TV route back then you would have just said he's trying to deflect from the impeachment.

'Grats on being able to play both sides of the coin at the same time, Chum

Blissfully lacking self awareness, rofl

[K-S-U-Wildcats!]

So he was taking it seriously while saying it's a hoax? That's a bit of a stretch even for Herr dax of the trump propaganda defense league.

He was calling the Democratic response in him not taking it seriously a hoax.   

You obviously didn't read the article I posted, because it runs counter to what your leaders tell you to believe and to say, like a little parrot boy.

Useful Idiot:  Thy name is LibDork .9

SMDH, sad

I think we can all agree it was not a good run of words together for him, but that's no different than any of his rallies.  His followers don't really care what he says anyways. 

He has way bigger sins in this COVID-19 vent than using the word hoax at a rally, we can all agree with that.

We should all be able to agree that Trump, and all our elected leaders, have made mistakes.

We should all be able to agree that Trump was "warned" of this virus just as he was likely warned of hundreds of threats that never came to pass.

We should all be able to agree that Trump downplayed the severity of the virus, just like many democrats and the media but I repeat myself did the same exact thing.

We should all be able to agree that our elected leaders were making decisions based upon questionable information from China, the WHO, and other agenices, questionable and incomplete data, and the speculative models resulting therefrom.

We should all be able to agree that we ought to extend our elected leaders a little bit of grace in these situations, understanding that in light of such crappy information they had to plan for the worst. But we should also all be able to agree that our elected leaders have taken actions guided by political considerations.

There's a lot of things we whould be able to agree upon. Instead it's non-stop political sniping. "Oooh but Trump does it, too." Trump's finger-pointing is mainly to point out the hypocrisy of his critics. And to deservedly point the finger at China and the WHO.

Have any of you actually watched the Crenshaw vid I posted? You should watch it. He covers this pretty effectively.

https://twitter.com/bennyjohnson/status/1251644816611573760

[sonofdaxjones]

It might be hard for people understand the point that Trump was taking it seriously because (1) he never once acted in a way that someone who was taking it seriously would act, (2) always acted in ways that are opposite of how someone who was taking it seriously would act, and (3) always acted in ways that someone who did not take it seriously would act.

If he would have taken the FearPorn TV route back then you would have just said he's trying to deflect from the impeachment.

'Grats on being able to play both sides of the coin at the same time, Chum

Blissfully lacking self awareness, rofl

You're one weird MF'er

[Bqqkie Pimp]

I know a lot of you want to subject yourself to testing, however two of the three labs making test kits were infecting them with the virus.

What a three ring circus this whole thing has turned out to be.

https://twitter.com/TruthHammer888/status/1252627671021834240

Did they do it on purpose or by accident?

I dunno.

But the thought of "on purpose" sickens me to my core.   "By accident" is just stupidity beyond comprehension.

[sonofdaxjones]

It might be hard for people understand the point that Trump was taking it seriously because (1) he never once acted in a way that someone who was taking it seriously would act, (2) always acted in ways that are opposite of how someone who was taking it seriously would act, and (3) always acted in ways that someone who did not take it seriously would act.

If he would have taken the FearPorn TV route back then you would have just said he's trying to deflect from the impeachment.

Trump was acquitted on 2/5.

Oh,so your post had a time frame on it . . .

[Bqqkie Pimp]

I know a lot of you want to subject yourself to testing, however two of the three labs making test kits were infecting them with the virus.

What a three ring circus this whole thing has turned out to be.

https://twitter.com/TruthHammer888/status/1252627671021834240

How long has the CDC been contracting with those labs, Book?

If/when info becomes available on that and I see it, I will share.

[Phil Titola]

We should all be able to agree that we ought to extend our elected leaders a little bit of grace in these situations, understanding that in light of such crappy information they had to plan for the worst. But we should also all be able to agree that our elected leaders have taken actions guided by political considerations.

There's a lot of things we whould be able to agree upon. Instead it's non-stop political sniping. "Oooh but Trump does it, too." Trump's finger-pointing is mainly to point out the hypocrisy of his critics. And to deservedly point the finger at China and the WHO.

Agree with most of your statements but not these two.  in the first there is no way in hell you can say Trump planned for the worst in this situation.  He was making jokes at rallies about it into March.  He in no way should have even been having rallies if he was planning for the worst.  We didn't get our ducks in a row when we had the chance.  That wasn't planning for the worst.

In the 2nd, Trump's finger pointing is almost exclusively to push the blame off of himself.  "obama didn't have testing system setup", "WHO gave us bad info", "governors didn't have their crap together", "media is blowing this up", "this will all go away in the summer", "such a nasty question" "stockpiles are empty" etc. etc.  All paraphrasing of different excuses he made to very specific questions about why we didn't have testing together sooner, why are there delays in our national plan to this, etc. etc.  He can only go back to one thing, he did a partial stop of people coming in from China.  That's it.  It wasn't enough.  He in none of those situations is point out hypocrisy, he is only trying to get the blame off of his lap.  Tune in right now and see him do it again.

[star seed 7]

Again, if you didn't want finger pointing and politizing to be the default response, maybe don't vote for people like trump.

Kdub is just trying to deflect from how horribly he has misjudged this whole situation, it's fairly transparent. From the very start he literally said democrats politicizing is disgusting but it was fine for Republicans to do because they were right (spoiler: they weren't).

Is politicizing even a word, and if so I'm pretty sure I'm not spelling it correctly