the thing i don't understand about people arguing to keep bars open...its like...if there was a flesh eating bacteria in the water supply and we couldn't figure out how to kill it, nobody would be making an argument for why FantaSea should be allowed to remain open.
I think you're missing my point.
I'm not saying that bars should or shouldn't be allowed to stay open. I'm saying that if we
do allow them to stay open, i think it's dumb to split the baby and say "you can only stay open in a way that effectively kills your business, while also doing something that is very dangerous." Just take a consistent approach: either shut them down wholesale and lean into the curbing the spread of the virus (and ideally compensate them), or take the path that preserving business health is more important than curbing the virus and let them stay open in a way that doesn't kill the business. Like I said, going halfway seems like the worst of both.
That's why your flesh eating bacteria analogy is off. the equivalent would essentially be "water parks can remain open notwithstanding the bacteria, but only between the hours of 6 am to 10 am, when patrons are least likely to enter the water."
if the water is going to kill them, maybe we should just close water parks for a while.
if the premise is "it's too dangerous for people to get drunk in bars in the time of corona" there are more coherent actions to take than "bars must close at 10 pm" is what i'm saying here. it's strange to me that people say that that position is ignorant or obtuse.