Impeachment Inquiry thread

[steve dave]

We’ve come a long way folks. Frankly I don’t even know where we got these goalposts from.


https://twitter.com/cnn/status/1222278071312617473


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[Dugout DickStone]

will they ever over play their hand on how absolutely stupid the trumpers are?  At some point will they realize he changes their position every day?

[steve dave]

https://twitter.com/hotlinejosh/status/1222288749813518339


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[Institutional Control]

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[chum1]

Sweet

[Dugout DickStone]

So do they play the “it doesn’t matter, it’s not impeachable” or the “Bolton is a liar and mad because I fired him”?

Which is the better line for idiots to believe?

[Phil Titola]

They can run with both. They will believe both at the exact same time.

[steve dave]

They are going with the first one now I believe. Dax, confirm?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[Dugout DickStone]

 So they are pretending the “the call was perfect, there was no quid pro qui” point that they relied on for several months?  I’d be afraid of looking like a huge rube

[sonofdaxjones]

We’re now entering “we got’em” Phase 5 or is it 6? 

It’s going to be sad watching LibDork Nation: The Most Useful of Idiots now go all in on John Bolton.

A man they use to hate with the power of a 1000 suns. 

[bucket]

We’re now entering “we got’em” Phase 5 or is it 6? 

It’s going to be sad watching LibDork Nation: The Most Useful of Idiots now go all in on John Bolton.

A man they use to hate with the power of a 1000 suns.

As a witness? Sure, why not? 

[sonofdaxjones]

We’re now entering “we got’em” Phase 5 or is it 6? 

It’s going to be sad watching LibDork Nation: The Most Useful of Idiots now go all in on John Bolton.

A man they use to hate with the power of a 1000 suns.

As a witness? Sure, why not? 

Useful idiots are too stupid to understand that nearly every dollar of US foreign aid for decades has been tied to some sort of quid pro quo.  Unless of course you are stupid and believe that the US has spent trillions on foreign out of shear benevolence and good will.

Now in an amazing turn of events, Democrats who according to themselves were extremely worried about corruption in the Ukraine.  Going so far as to forcing corrupt Ukrainian leaders to fire a “corrupt” prosecutor because he was so gosh darn corrupt . . . with a former VPOTUS openly bragging about getting the prosecutor fired because supposedly he was so gosh darn corrupt. 

Are now saying this  president shouldn’t have had any concerns about corruption in the Ukraine and thus should have just green lit, no questions asked foreign aid.   

LOL

[Dugout DickStone]

Quid pro quo is fine when using my tax dollars to assist the us in advancing the us taxpayer interests.

Djt used my tax dollars to help him win an election if the allegations are true.

[catastrophe]

So Dax, do you think there was a quid pro quo?

[star seed 7]

Dax, why do you think Bolton should be blocked from testifying?

[sonofdaxjones]

Quid pro quo is fine when using my tax dollars to assist the us in advancing the us taxpayer interests.

Djt used my tax dollars to help him win an election if the allegations are true.

LOL, you’re own rough ridin' party literally had whole commissions about the corruption in the Ukraine and then when ChiCom Joe became point man on the Ukraine suddenly there was a lot less concern about corruption.  Until of course the unilaterally declared “corrupt” Ukrainian prosecutor started doing some uncomfortable things in regards to Burisma and all of sudden corruption was a big deal again and (clearly) inextricably tied to the receipt of US foreign aid.

You can’t ask questions about our corruption (LibDork Nation).

But for Trump: You can’t have any concerns about corruption.

[waks]

Quid pro quo is fine when using my tax dollars to assist the us in advancing the us taxpayer interests.

Djt used my tax dollars to help him win an election if the allegations are true.

LOL, you’re own rough ridin' party literally had whole commissions about the corruption in the Ukraine and then when ChiCom Joe became point man on the Ukraine suddenly there was a lot less concern about corruption.  Until of course the unilaterally declared “corrupt” Ukrainian prosecutor started doing some uncomfortable things in regards to Burisma and all of sudden corruption was a big deal again and (clearly) inextricably tied to the receipt of US foreign aid.

You can’t ask questions about our corruption (LibDork Nation).

But for Trump: You can’t have any concerns about corruption.

Lol, you're just making things up. The US, the EU and the IMF all wanted Shokin gone. Or do you not know what unilateral means?

[sonofdaxjones]

Quid pro quo is fine when using my tax dollars to assist the us in advancing the us taxpayer interests.

Djt used my tax dollars to help him win an election if the allegations are true.

LOL, you’re own rough ridin' party literally had whole commissions about the corruption in the Ukraine and then when ChiCom Joe became point man on the Ukraine suddenly there was a lot less concern about corruption.  Until of course the unilaterally declared “corrupt” Ukrainian prosecutor started doing some uncomfortable things in regards to Burisma and all of sudden corruption was a big deal again and (clearly) inextricably tied to the receipt of US foreign aid.

You can’t ask questions about our corruption (LibDork Nation).

But for Trump: You can’t have any concerns about corruption.

Lol, you're just making things up. The US, the EU and the IMF all wanted Shokin gone. Or do you not know what unilateral means?

Lol, they literally went off their own decelerations of corruption.   Singling out individuals in the Ukraine and declaring that they (alone) were corrupt is positively LOL’able and only total idiots like you actually believe that.

There’s literally EU countries who right now as we speak do billions of Euro’s a year in business with entities run by oligarch’s and they don’t like it when their most favored oligarchs are being investigated . . . and/or they want to make sure they’re helping their favorite oligarchs put the competition out of business.

[waks]

Quid pro quo is fine when using my tax dollars to assist the us in advancing the us taxpayer interests.

Djt used my tax dollars to help him win an election if the allegations are true.

LOL, you’re own rough ridin' party literally had whole commissions about the corruption in the Ukraine and then when ChiCom Joe became point man on the Ukraine suddenly there was a lot less concern about corruption.  Until of course the unilaterally declared “corrupt” Ukrainian prosecutor started doing some uncomfortable things in regards to Burisma and all of sudden corruption was a big deal again and (clearly) inextricably tied to the receipt of US foreign aid.

You can’t ask questions about our corruption (LibDork Nation).

But for Trump: You can’t have any concerns about corruption.

Lol, you're just making things up. The US, the EU and the IMF all wanted Shokin gone. Or do you not know what unilateral means?

Lol, they literally went off their own decelerations of corruption.   Singling our individuals in the Ukraine and declaring that they (alone) were corrupt is positively LOL’able and only total idiots like you actually believe that.

Please continue. You look worse than you did in the Mahomes thread.

[sonofdaxjones]

Quid pro quo is fine when using my tax dollars to assist the us in advancing the us taxpayer interests.

Djt used my tax dollars to help him win an election if the allegations are true.

LOL, you’re own rough ridin' party literally had whole commissions about the corruption in the Ukraine and then when ChiCom Joe became point man on the Ukraine suddenly there was a lot less concern about corruption.  Until of course the unilaterally declared “corrupt” Ukrainian prosecutor started doing some uncomfortable things in regards to Burisma and all of sudden corruption was a big deal again and (clearly) inextricably tied to the receipt of US foreign aid.

You can’t ask questions about our corruption (LibDork Nation).

But for Trump: You can’t have any concerns about corruption.

Lol, you're just making things up. The US, the EU and the IMF all wanted Shokin gone. Or do you not know what unilateral means?

Lol, they literally went off their own decelerations of corruption.   Singling our individuals in the Ukraine and declaring that they (alone) were corrupt is positively LOL’able and only total idiots like you actually believe that.

Please continue. You look worse than you did in the Mahomes thread.

Lol, you’re literally declaring victory 3 years in hindsight.  That’s how sad you are Waks, FFS. 

Pathetic

[LickNeckey]

is it true that Giulianni was working to oust the new prosecutor who was targeting his associates interests in corruption investigations?

[waks]

Quid pro quo is fine when using my tax dollars to assist the us in advancing the us taxpayer interests.

Djt used my tax dollars to help him win an election if the allegations are true.

LOL, you’re own rough ridin' party literally had whole commissions about the corruption in the Ukraine and then when ChiCom Joe became point man on the Ukraine suddenly there was a lot less concern about corruption.  Until of course the unilaterally declared “corrupt” Ukrainian prosecutor started doing some uncomfortable things in regards to Burisma and all of sudden corruption was a big deal again and (clearly) inextricably tied to the receipt of US foreign aid.

You can’t ask questions about our corruption (LibDork Nation).

But for Trump: You can’t have any concerns about corruption.

Lol, you're just making things up. The US, the EU and the IMF all wanted Shokin gone. Or do you not know what unilateral means?

Lol, they literally went off their own decelerations of corruption.   Singling our individuals in the Ukraine and declaring that they (alone) were corrupt is positively LOL’able and only total idiots like you actually believe that.

Please continue. You look worse than you did in the Mahomes thread.

Lol, you’re literally declaring victory 3 years in hindsight.  That’s how sad you are Waks, FFS. 

Pathetic

Just pointing out a pattern, friend. Don't worry, when you go back and delete those posts, most won't remember them.

[sonofdaxjones]

is it true that Giulianni was working to oust the new prosecutor who was targeting his associates interests in corruption investigations?

Is it true that LibDorks want to believe a guy who is already under indictment by this administration?

Rhetorical question wants to know

[sonofdaxjones]

Quid pro quo is fine when using my tax dollars to assist the us in advancing the us taxpayer interests.

Djt used my tax dollars to help him win an election if the allegations are true.

LOL, you’re own rough ridin' party literally had whole commissions about the corruption in the Ukraine and then when ChiCom Joe became point man on the Ukraine suddenly there was a lot less concern about corruption.  Until of course the unilaterally declared “corrupt” Ukrainian prosecutor started doing some uncomfortable things in regards to Burisma and all of sudden corruption was a big deal again and (clearly) inextricably tied to the receipt of US foreign aid.

You can’t ask questions about our corruption (LibDork Nation).

But for Trump: You can’t have any concerns about corruption.

Lol, you're just making things up. The US, the EU and the IMF all wanted Shokin gone. Or do you not know what unilateral means?

Lol, they literally went off their own decelerations of corruption.   Singling our individuals in the Ukraine and declaring that they (alone) were corrupt is positively LOL’able and only total idiots like you actually believe that.

Please continue. You look worse than you did in the Mahomes thread.

Lol, you’re literally declaring victory 3 years in hindsight.  That’s how sad you are Waks, FFS. 

Pathetic

Just pointing out a pattern, friend. Don't worry, when you go back and delete those posts, most won't remember them.

And I’m only pointing out an ongoing pattern of your stupidity and rage.  So much rage that you’re literally jizzing yourself that I was wrong about a QB pick based on results 3 or 4 years later and then equating it to this discussion, LOL.

Tap out accepted.

[waks]

Quid pro quo is fine when using my tax dollars to assist the us in advancing the us taxpayer interests.

Djt used my tax dollars to help him win an election if the allegations are true.

LOL, you’re own rough ridin' party literally had whole commissions about the corruption in the Ukraine and then when ChiCom Joe became point man on the Ukraine suddenly there was a lot less concern about corruption.  Until of course the unilaterally declared “corrupt” Ukrainian prosecutor started doing some uncomfortable things in regards to Burisma and all of sudden corruption was a big deal again and (clearly) inextricably tied to the receipt of US foreign aid.

You can’t ask questions about our corruption (LibDork Nation).

But for Trump: You can’t have any concerns about corruption.

Lol, you're just making things up. The US, the EU and the IMF all wanted Shokin gone. Or do you not know what unilateral means?

Lol, they literally went off their own decelerations of corruption.   Singling our individuals in the Ukraine and declaring that they (alone) were corrupt is positively LOL’able and only total idiots like you actually believe that.

Please continue. You look worse than you did in the Mahomes thread.

Lol, you’re literally declaring victory 3 years in hindsight.  That’s how sad you are Waks, FFS. 

Pathetic

Just pointing out a pattern, friend. Don't worry, when you go back and delete those posts, most won't remember them.

And I’m only pointing out an ongoing pattern of your stupidity and rage.  So much rage that you’re literally jizzing yourself that I was wrong about a QB pick based on results 3 or 4 years later and then equating it to this discussion, LOL.

Tap out accepted.

Where was the tap out, exactly? You're deranged. Sorry that the cool kids are picking on you. Maybe if you shut up for once everyone wouldn't know you to be the miserable, old fool that you are.