goemaw.com

General Discussion => The New Joe Montgomery Birther Pit => Topic started by: Institutional Control on October 31, 2019, 12:04:19 PM

Title: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: Institutional Control on October 31, 2019, 12:04:19 PM
Might as well have a thread dedicate to the impeachment.


https://twitter.com/ap/status/1189929448885407744?s=21


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: LickNeckey on October 31, 2019, 01:42:19 PM
are the rules of the witch hunt acceptable?
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: sonofdaxjones on October 31, 2019, 08:15:28 PM
Man, another resident LibBot fapfest thread. 

#stunned

Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: DaBigTrain on October 31, 2019, 08:16:05 PM
Man, another resident LibBot fapfest thread. 

#stunned

How many Hillary/Obama/ChiCom Threads have you started?
Title: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: sonofdaxjones on October 31, 2019, 08:20:18 PM
Man, another resident LibBot fapfest thread. 

#stunned

How many Hillary/Obama/ChiCom Threads have you started?

It’s weird how you never respond when I remind you what a war mongering eff up your guy was.

Literally kicked off China and Russia’s emergence/reemergence in Africa.
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: DaBigTrain on October 31, 2019, 08:21:51 PM
If you guessed 3 of the last 5 topics Dax has started you win!

(https://uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/20191101/a8af4807518a9a06ef97e6ed50a9b24b.png)
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: sonofdaxjones on October 31, 2019, 08:24:15 PM
If you guessed 3 of the last 5 topics Dax has started you win!

(https://uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/20191101/a8af4807518a9a06ef97e6ed50a9b24b.png)

Mainly because I know it enrages you.


Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: steve dave on November 01, 2019, 08:03:27 AM
https://twitter.com/johnjharwood/status/1190244106053783553


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: Dugout DickStone on November 01, 2019, 11:09:27 AM
the non-educated seem to really think this impeachment is a bad idea
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: steve dave on November 01, 2019, 02:39:41 PM
https://twitter.com/andrewfeinberg/status/1190349513644552192


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: Brock Landers on November 01, 2019, 02:45:38 PM
omg please let this happen :pray:
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: star seed 7 on November 01, 2019, 02:47:55 PM
Imagine trump trying to read that summary lol he'll need a case of sudo for the attempt
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: star seed 7 on November 02, 2019, 02:32:44 PM
https://twitter.com/kylegriffin1/status/1190344226757853185

Do NOT discuss this beautiful and perfect call with ANYONE
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: gatoveintisiete on November 02, 2019, 06:38:09 PM
Do you rubes really feel comfortable playing Tomato-TomAHto with the American Presidency.... get a life.
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: bucket on November 02, 2019, 07:11:00 PM
Do you rubes really feel comfortable playing Tomato-TomAHto with the American Presidency.... get a life.

Sorry?
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: gatoveintisiete on November 02, 2019, 07:32:45 PM
Tomato- We asked Ukraine to investigate its role in the 2016 election and possible corruption by our vice president and his son that the former vice President bragged about publicly, because the American people want answers on both.

TomAHto- Trump withheld support until Ukraine agreed to investigate his political opponent.
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: bucket on November 02, 2019, 07:39:27 PM
(https://media.tenor.com/images/1d7be2a6bde81d68277e361e52a0778b/tenor.gif)
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: gatoveintisiete on November 02, 2019, 07:40:51 PM
not a very moderate position to assume the worst motive for our stud President  :nono:
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: bucket on November 02, 2019, 10:18:09 PM
not a very moderate position to assume the worst motive for our stud President  :nono:

Moderate position?
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: MakeItRain on November 04, 2019, 03:12:24 AM
not a very moderate position to assume the worst motive for our stud President  :nono:

Moderate position?

You didn't know? In today's America the law applies differently to people depending on where you fall on the political spectrum.
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: steve dave on November 04, 2019, 12:34:35 PM
lmao


https://twitter.com/kevinmkruse/status/1191422764818878471


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: Cire on November 04, 2019, 12:43:50 PM
I'd pay money for a fireside impeachment chat
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: KSURFC8 on November 04, 2019, 12:55:41 PM
It doesn't matter what the dumb-as-sh*t Dems in the House do, try to do or just f*cking flail around trying to figure out what to do, they'll never get the 20 GOP Sens to go along with their sorry a** excuse of a coup and actually convict a sitting President.

The House is pissing up the proverbial rope and it's gonna cost the stupid f*ckers dearly. Nancy knows this and she's desperately trying to figure out if she can get enough deck chairs to the other side of the Titanic and prevent it from actually sinking like a stone.
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: catastrophe on November 04, 2019, 01:52:44 PM
Was that from TX-Ags?
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: steve dave on November 04, 2019, 04:29:23 PM
Yeah, I’ve said it a long time but the last thing dem leadership wants is to impeach and remove trump.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: sonofdaxjones on November 04, 2019, 04:42:26 PM
Yeah, I’ve said it a long time but the last thing dem leadership wants is to impeach and remove trump.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Nancy is going to allow the impeachment charade to continue until the establishment talks somebody into running.   She's once again back to calling out the Whack-A-Doo's.

Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: star seed 7 on November 04, 2019, 04:50:32 PM
Lol
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: sonofdaxjones on November 04, 2019, 07:03:45 PM
Lol

Super fast, this time. 
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: steve dave on November 05, 2019, 12:49:20 PM
https://twitter.com/adamgoldmanNYT/status/1191788889352093698

https://twitter.com/AndrewDesiderio/status/1191790603786489862
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: star seed 7 on November 05, 2019, 01:16:06 PM
Another deep state never trump liar smdh
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: steve dave on November 05, 2019, 01:33:45 PM
https://twitter.com/kt_so_it_goes/status/1191798074693300224


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: Cire on November 05, 2019, 01:39:38 PM
LOL
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: star seed 7 on November 05, 2019, 02:09:01 PM
https://twitter.com/matthewamiller/status/1191790603186642947
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: steve dave on November 05, 2019, 02:31:04 PM
he assumed everyone else was going to lie too and then when they started releasing testimony he was like, "oh crap, I'm not going to jail!" and sprinted back in there

also, lmao

https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/1186600971130015744
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: steve dave on November 05, 2019, 02:32:45 PM
LMAOOOOOOOOOO

https://twitter.com/gabrielmalor/status/1191805472837439488


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: star seed 7 on November 05, 2019, 02:50:52 PM
Yeah, these transcript releases have highlighted how clownish the republicans have been. I love when they bitch about not being able to ask questions during their turn to ask questions. Dax ate that crap right up
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: DaBigTrain on November 05, 2019, 02:57:39 PM
:lol:
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: sonofdaxjones on November 05, 2019, 03:03:15 PM
How many times a day do you guys rub one out thinking about impeachment?

Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: catastrophe on November 05, 2019, 03:12:55 PM
Agree with Dax that is top shelf material for people who get horned up over impeachment.
Title: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: steve dave on November 05, 2019, 03:44:28 PM
LMAO


https://twitter.com/neeratanden/status/1191819206276403200


https://twitter.com/kathrynw5/status/1191824848978358274


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: Institutional Control on November 05, 2019, 04:03:27 PM
https://twitter.com/NumbersMuncher/status/1191813210820751361?s=20
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: Brock Landers on November 05, 2019, 04:17:35 PM
That's a great strategy since their dumb supporters are too dumb to know the whistleblower is irrelevant.
Title: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: catastrophe on November 05, 2019, 04:33:01 PM
The whole investigation is a sham because the whistleblower complaint was based on hearsay. Doesn’t matter that the hearsay was corroborated by people who have first hand knowledge of the facts because the process was flawed from the start.
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: chum1 on November 05, 2019, 04:52:04 PM
I like it when the call the whistleblower a leaker.
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: Dugout DickStone on November 05, 2019, 05:01:29 PM
LMAO


https://twitter.com/neeratanden/status/1191819206276403200


https://twitter.com/kathrynw5/status/1191824848978358274


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

oooof
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: Institutional Control on November 05, 2019, 05:03:48 PM
The whole investigation is a sham because the whistleblower complaint was based on hearsay. Doesn’t matter that the hearsay was corroborated by people who have first hand knowledge of the facts because the process was flawed from the start.
READ THE TRANSCRIPT!


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: sonofdaxjones on November 05, 2019, 05:18:32 PM
The only thing to know is that this will continue as long as the LibBot main stream elites are freaking out about the prospect of Liz Warren or Mayor Pete being the nominee.

Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: star seed 7 on November 05, 2019, 05:21:06 PM
I thought it was only about protecting biden?
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: sonofdaxjones on November 05, 2019, 05:30:04 PM
I thought it was only about protecting biden?

Joe drop out of the race?
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: star seed 7 on November 05, 2019, 05:36:53 PM
Only Hillary can calm these waters, dax
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: sonofdaxjones on November 05, 2019, 05:40:59 PM
FOIA reveals that the Obama State Department was so unconcerned about the Biden's and Burisma they are on record coaching Yovanovitch as to how to answer questions on the subject, imploring her to keep it simple.





Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: sonofdaxjones on November 05, 2019, 05:43:32 PM
Only Hillary can calm these waters, dax

If she does, you'll be your usual comfortable self, ready to fly in pew-pew'ing your way to a strident LibBot Hillary defense on all issues.

If Hillary can deliver the WH to (D) nation they (you) won't care one bit about her corruption, racism and war mongering.   Just like last time.



Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: star seed 7 on November 05, 2019, 05:49:48 PM
Lol
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: star seed 7 on November 06, 2019, 01:40:23 PM
We have now moved into the "Trump and his admin are too stupid to self-deal" phase of the defense

https://twitter.com/stevenportnoy/status/1192133333616136193
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: Dugout DickStone on November 06, 2019, 01:44:06 PM
LMFAO
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: DaBigTrain on November 06, 2019, 02:13:04 PM
Very stable GENIUS.  Trump and his minions have formed a defense that they are literally too stupid to even commit crimes.  Incredible :lol:
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: Dugout DickStone on November 06, 2019, 02:29:12 PM
was also their stealing the election defense.  And a good one at that
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: sonofdaxjones on November 06, 2019, 02:37:17 PM
Unfortunately LibBot Nation so mired in corruption and so openly willing to protect corruption as long as a Democrat is doing it, has no interest in understanding all the criminality that was taking place in the Ukraine during the previous administration.

While expected, it's still very very sad.  SMDH

Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: sonofdaxjones on November 06, 2019, 02:55:14 PM
So much rage . .  . relative of any LiBBots on here?



https://twitter.com/seanmdav/status/1192133084038287366?s=20
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: star seed 7 on November 06, 2019, 02:58:59 PM
Lol, really scraping the bottom of the barrel now huh?
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: sonofdaxjones on November 06, 2019, 03:05:23 PM
Lol, really scraping the bottom of the barrel now huh?

LibBot.9flection:  125%
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: catastrophe on November 06, 2019, 05:08:34 PM
Agreed Dax. This man and his client cannot be trusted absent some kind of corroborating first-hand testimony or at least a written summary of the call that backs up his claims.
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: Institutional Control on November 06, 2019, 07:18:07 PM
Dax going to the “I’m rubber and you’re glue” defense.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: DaBigTrain on November 06, 2019, 08:18:34 PM
Dax going to the “I’m rubber and you’re glue” defense.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

It really plays well into the "We are way too rough ridin' stupid to be accused of committing crimes" strategy they have working right now.
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: sonofdaxjones on November 07, 2019, 06:25:58 AM
Really weird path to a “slam dunk” impeachment. 

Sadly, LibBot Nation, particularly those on here don’t care about Schiff’s lies or the numerous obvious conflicts. 

But this should be expected from a fully assimilated band of hyper-partisans. 

I only heard this in passing so I could be mistaken.  But did I hear that in one poll 72% of LibBot respondents said that there’s nothing Trump could do (that’s Nothing) that would ever change their mind on his job performance?

If I heard that right, that’s about as useful idiot partisan as you can get.   No surprise, but still amaze
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: steve dave on November 07, 2019, 07:20:31 AM
lmao


https://twitter.com/verambergen/status/1192189847974363142


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: Institutional Control on November 07, 2019, 08:05:36 AM
LOL
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: ChiComCat on November 07, 2019, 08:19:53 AM
Really weird path to a “slam dunk” impeachment. 

Sadly, LibBot Nation, particularly those on here don’t care about Schiff’s lies or the numerous obvious conflicts. 

But this should be expected from a fully assimilated band of hyper-partisans. 

I only heard this in passing so I could be mistaken.  But did I hear that in one poll 72% of LibBot respondents said that there’s nothing Trump could do (that’s Nothing) that would ever change their mind on his job performance?

If I heard that right, that’s about as useful idiot partisan as you can get.   No surprise, but still amaze

lol @ the trump supporter worried about conflicts of interest with anything
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: sonofdaxjones on November 07, 2019, 08:20:09 AM
Pretty awesome, what a Geo-Strategic coup that would have been.


The New Cold Warriors of LibDerp Nation should be fist pumping their collective asses off over that move. 

In regard to the Ukraine. 

Trump:  Lethal Aid to the Ukraine.

Obama:  No lethal aid to the Ukraine while Lib operatives acted in a very highly corrupt fashion.

SMDH


Ah uh ah ah in regards to the uh ah ah Biden Family dealings in the Ukraine uh ah ah, you’ll have to ah ah talk to uh Joe uh about that.

An administration looking to stamp out corruption, obviously.
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: sonofdaxjones on November 07, 2019, 08:21:51 AM
Really weird path to a “slam dunk” impeachment. 

Sadly, LibBot Nation, particularly those on here don’t care about Schiff’s lies or the numerous obvious conflicts. 

But this should be expected from a fully assimilated band of hyper-partisans. 

I only heard this in passing so I could be mistaken.  But did I hear that in one poll 72% of LibBot respondents said that there’s nothing Trump could do (that’s Nothing) that would ever change their mind on his job performance?

If I heard that right, that’s about as useful idiot partisan as you can get.   No surprise, but still amaze

lol @ the trump supporter worried about conflicts of interest with anything

LibFlection: 125%
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: star seed 7 on November 07, 2019, 08:25:01 AM
Why don't we just buy Ukraine and then everything is fine?
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: ChiComCat on November 07, 2019, 08:34:53 AM
A lawyer representing the whistleblower doesn't like Trump :horrorsurprise:

I get the argument that it's a conflict though.  Trump definitely wants one of his voters going after him so they won't be college-educated.
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: LickNeckey on November 07, 2019, 09:14:12 AM
can't believe Bill allowed himself to be investigated by a pub
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: Dugout DickStone on November 07, 2019, 09:34:10 AM
Really weird path to a “slam dunk” impeachment. 

Sadly, LibBot Nation, particularly those on here don’t care about Schiff’s lies or the numerous obvious conflicts. 

But this should be expected from a fully assimilated band of hyper-partisans. 

I only heard this in passing so I could be mistaken.  But did I hear that in one poll 72% of LibBot respondents said that there’s nothing Trump could do (that’s Nothing) that would ever change their mind on his job performance?

If I heard that right, that’s about as useful idiot partisan as you can get.   No surprise, but still amaze

overheard in a hipster coffee shop
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: steve dave on November 07, 2019, 09:56:14 AM
lmao


https://twitter.com/ndrew_lawrence/status/1192236126322470912


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: catastrophe on November 07, 2019, 10:00:13 AM
And all the people not in cahoots with Dems can’t testify. Curse you executive privilege!!
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: LickNeckey on November 07, 2019, 11:18:00 AM
 “Bill Barr did not decline my request to talk about Ukraine”

 :confused:
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: steve dave on November 07, 2019, 03:02:55 PM
https://twitter.com/nbcpolitics/status/1192544927005040640


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: star seed 7 on November 07, 2019, 03:05:26 PM
ANOTHER deep state never trumper?
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: sonofdaxjones on November 07, 2019, 03:21:19 PM
ANOTHER deep state never trumper?

LibDork.9:  Fully Assimilated

Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: catastrophe on November 07, 2019, 03:21:37 PM
Yeah well that’s like, his opinion.
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: bucket on November 08, 2019, 11:22:01 AM
https://twitter.com/mkraju/status/1192828052348252160
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: steve dave on November 08, 2019, 11:37:02 AM
lmao


https://twitter.com/kyledcheney/status/1192857222390407169


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: catastrophe on November 08, 2019, 11:53:49 AM
I’d be so proud if I could make myself look that cool on a transcript.
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: sonofdaxjones on November 08, 2019, 12:01:37 PM
Good to know that Vinnie and his "interagency" pals thought they were making policy on the Ukraine.

Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: Dugout DickStone on November 08, 2019, 12:10:32 PM
https://twitter.com/mkraju/status/1192828052348252160

Poor dax has to now go 180 and say the hearings shouldn't be public
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: steve dave on November 08, 2019, 12:12:46 PM
https://twitter.com/natashabertrand/status/1192834617251905538


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: catastrophe on November 08, 2019, 12:23:12 PM
Sucks for Trump this keeps happening to people who could clear his name.
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: Dugout DickStone on November 08, 2019, 12:25:13 PM
pretty clear Mulvaney turned into a never trumper
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: sonofdaxjones on November 08, 2019, 12:45:13 PM
SMDH just hate to hear that the former ambassador to the Ukraine (a very corrupt person) may have lied under oath.

Color me . . . not surprised.

Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: Institutional Control on November 08, 2019, 01:17:45 PM
SMDH just hate to hear that the former ambassador to the Ukraine (a very corrupt person) may have lied under oath.

Color me . . . not surprised.

You are on point with all the latest talking points.
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: steve dave on November 08, 2019, 03:59:18 PM
damn, BBC and PBS are going to show the full impeachment hearings gavel to gavel
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: catastrophe on November 09, 2019, 12:30:42 AM
Well I thoroughly enjoy watching parliamentary proceedings when I accidentally notice they’re on tv, so I can see the Brits being similarly amused with our dumpster fire crap.
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: steve dave on November 11, 2019, 08:59:13 AM
https://twitter.com/natashabertrand/status/1193667590306095107


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: bucket on November 11, 2019, 04:49:57 PM
https://twitter.com/CNN/status/1193985191787798533

What could go wrong?
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: Rage Against the McKee on November 11, 2019, 05:17:31 PM
Any competent attorney will tell you that your Miranda rights aren't actually important.
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: star seed 7 on November 11, 2019, 05:26:58 PM
What a fantastic idea
Title: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: catastrophe on November 11, 2019, 08:41:59 PM
Any competent attorney will tell you that Giuliani isn’t one
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: SkinnyBenny on November 11, 2019, 11:14:03 PM
Even incompetent non-attorneys can tell you that.
Title: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: steve dave on November 12, 2019, 08:32:12 AM
He’s digging through the archives searching for calls in which he didn’t do crimes to release them. Thus proving his innocence.


https://twitter.com/realdonaldtrump/status/1194035922066714625


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: star seed 7 on November 12, 2019, 08:34:08 AM
Will be interesting to see if it's a transcript or another summary
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: catastrophe on November 12, 2019, 09:08:23 AM
Really could be more bad stuff that they’re worried will come out later.
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: steve dave on November 12, 2019, 10:12:33 AM
https://twitter.com/BradMossEsq/status/1194281788916555776
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: catastrophe on November 12, 2019, 01:20:28 PM
Warm up the “too stupid” defense!
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: star seed 7 on November 12, 2019, 01:31:06 PM
Oh THAT wikileaks
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: Institutional Control on November 13, 2019, 09:23:45 AM
Is there a bigger clown in Congress than Devin Nunes?
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: steve dave on November 13, 2019, 09:39:14 AM
Is there a bigger clown in Congress than Devin Nunes?

Matt Gaetz and that super unabashedly racist guy from Iowa

EDIT: googled "iowa racist" and it's Steve King
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: sonofdaxjones on November 13, 2019, 10:14:59 AM
Nobody can touch the liars liar Adam "I have hard evidence of COLUSION" Schiff

Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: steve dave on November 13, 2019, 12:45:34 PM
lmao, jordan isn't even asking questions. he's just yelling at taylor. and taylor is just smirking. amaze.
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: star seed 7 on November 13, 2019, 12:48:09 PM
Gym Jordan is dax level insane
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: sonofdaxjones on November 13, 2019, 12:56:23 PM
I don't like Jim Jordan, and I'd be asking all kinds of questions getting straight to the point.

But it's good to know what LibBot Nation is all in on Adam "I have hard evidence of COLUSION" Schiff . . . he's not a weirdo at all.   :lol:
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: star seed 7 on November 13, 2019, 01:01:15 PM
When was the last hearing on any subject that the Republicans didn't look like completely out of control clowns?
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: Rage Against the McKee on November 13, 2019, 01:02:38 PM
When was the last hearing on any subject that the Republicans didn't look like completely out of control clowns?

when they abolished slavery, probably.
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: sonofdaxjones on November 13, 2019, 01:08:28 PM
When is the last time the LibBot Leadership didn't go all in on something only to have it be a nothing causing even more  :curse: because they didn't get the outcome they demanded?

It's been years, but the doubling, tripling . . . down will continue unabated.

Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: catastrophe on November 13, 2019, 01:09:37 PM
When was the last hearing on any subject that the Republicans didn't look like completely out of control clowns?

When they had that lady prosecutor asking questions during the Kavanaugh stuff.
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: Rage Against the McKee on November 13, 2019, 01:10:56 PM
When was the last hearing on any subject that the Republicans didn't look like completely out of control clowns?

When they had that lady prosecutor asking questions during the Kavanaugh stuff.

I don't think that counts because they couldn't finish the hearing without kicking her out and making asses of themselves.
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: star seed 7 on November 13, 2019, 01:20:05 PM
When was the last hearing on any subject that the Republicans didn't look like completely out of control clowns?

When they had that lady prosecutor asking questions during the Kavanaugh stuff.

They canned her because she wasn't clownish enough. Remember Lindsay melting down? Good grief

Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: star seed 7 on November 13, 2019, 01:20:32 PM
Heh

https://twitter.com/jessicaschulb/status/1194676540782473216
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: steve dave on November 13, 2019, 01:24:48 PM
I'm curious if Jim Jordan thinks he's helping Trump by doing this thing he's doing
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: steve dave on November 13, 2019, 02:34:42 PM
https://twitter.com/axios/status/1194704941996220423
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: steve dave on November 13, 2019, 03:03:48 PM
https://twitter.com/andizeisler/status/1194687997913862144


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: Rage Against the McKee on November 13, 2019, 03:06:26 PM
His wrestlers probably sucked, anyway.
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: steve dave on November 13, 2019, 03:08:26 PM
I'm curious if Jim Jordan thinks he's helping Trump by doing this thing he's doing

lmao


https://twitter.com/sahilkapur/status/1194721585795653633


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: sonofdaxjones on November 13, 2019, 03:45:10 PM
Back the eff off Jim Jordan, unilateral declarations of victory/bad for opposition etc. etc. are solely the domain of LibBot Leadership.
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: star seed 7 on November 13, 2019, 04:02:21 PM
So much anger from dax  :frown:
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: Dugout DickStone on November 13, 2019, 04:12:16 PM
going complete ape crap
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: sonofdaxjones on November 13, 2019, 04:16:25 PM
Only we can unilaterally declare a victory (and have our useful idiots believe it) . . . LiBBot Leadership

Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: Dugout DickStone on November 13, 2019, 04:21:38 PM
this Jordan guy had a literal tantrum
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: sonofdaxjones on November 13, 2019, 04:29:48 PM
this Jordan guy had a literal tantrum

All opposition to us is rage and tantrums (LibBot Nation)

Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: Institutional Control on November 13, 2019, 04:32:53 PM
https://twitter.com/jdmaccoby/status/1194744146172485632?s=21.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: I_have_purplewood on November 13, 2019, 06:19:40 PM
this Jordan guy had a literal tantrum

All opposition to us is rage and tantrums (LibBot Nation)

I have never seen shorter memories than libbot nation.  No dem ever lost their crap during the Kavanaugh hearings... or, or... the Mueller report.  And Schiff is the biggest buffoon in the history of congress.  Not sure how you do it Dax.
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: 8manpick on November 13, 2019, 06:34:02 PM
Post the vids, purpledick
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: steve dave on November 13, 2019, 06:38:55 PM
https://www.esquire.com/news-politics/politics/a29788717/republicans-impeachment-hearings-devin-nunes/


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: I_have_purplewood on November 13, 2019, 06:45:52 PM
Post the vids, purpledick

Because your memory is so short 8manprick?
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: 8manpick on November 13, 2019, 06:49:56 PM
Post the vids, purpledick

Because your memory is so short 8manprick?
That is uncalled for, your username is a clear phallic reference, mine is not.

Please post the videos of the Democratic equivalent of the Jordan tantrum from either the Kavanaugh or Mueller hearings. Otherwise, do the honorable thing and acknowledge your tap out.
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: gatoveintisiete on November 13, 2019, 07:00:27 PM
I am very busy at work this month, can somebody make a smokin' gun thread so us worker bees can follow the daily ass whoopin's put on my guy Trump? tia
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: SkinnyBenny on November 13, 2019, 07:54:00 PM
When is the last time the LibBot Leadership didn't go all in on something only to have it be a nothing causing even more  :curse: because they didn't get the outcome they demanded?

It's been years, but the doubling, tripling . . . down will continue unabated.


Tell us more about Benghazi
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: gatoveintisiete on November 13, 2019, 07:55:54 PM
Also feel free to throw in all the BOMBSHELLS  :excited:
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: bucket on November 13, 2019, 07:59:13 PM
https://twitter.com/jdawsey1/status/1194697450453438465

Their voters are stupid
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: SkinnyBenny on November 13, 2019, 09:06:40 PM
It truly is amazing how stupid most of their voters are.
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: sonofdaxjones on November 14, 2019, 05:09:45 AM
When is the last time the LibBot Leadership didn't go all in on something only to have it be a nothing causing even more  :curse: because they didn't get the outcome they demanded?

It's been years, but the doubling, tripling . . . down will continue unabated.


Tell us more about Benghazi

Yes we all remember when an administration tried to claim a YouTube video killed an Ambassador (surrounded by CIA special operators, in a city filled with fresh recruits to be sent to Syria for the next regime change attempt). 
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: LickNeckey on November 14, 2019, 08:09:34 AM
When is the last time the LibBot Leadership didn't go all in on something only to have it be a nothing causing even more  :curse: because they didn't get the outcome they demanded?

It's been years, but the doubling, tripling . . . down will continue unabated.


Tell us more about Benghazi

Yes we all remember when an administration tried to claim a YouTube video killed an Ambassador (surrounded by CIA special operators, in a city filled with fresh recruits to be sent to Syria for the next regime change attempt). 

oh man i remember this

closed door depositions

hours and hours of private testimony

2 years of investigation

resulting in...



Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: sonofdaxjones on November 14, 2019, 08:12:31 AM
When is the last time the LibBot Leadership didn't go all in on something only to have it be a nothing causing even more  :curse: because they didn't get the outcome they demanded?

It's been years, but the doubling, tripling . . . down will continue unabated.


Tell us more about Benghazi

Yes we all remember when an administration tried to claim a YouTube video killed an Ambassador (surrounded by CIA special operators, in a city filled with fresh recruits to be sent to Syria for the next regime change attempt). 

oh man i remember this

closed door depositions

hours and hours of private testimony

2 years of investigation

resulting in...

Remember how you guys cheerleaded the total lack of cooperation from the White House?

How you thought it was just awesome the Hillary (lying out of her ass) got up there and asked why it even matters?

Good Flying Spaghetti Monster . . . the perpetual LibBot Meltdown of Today would add another 100 Megatons of power if the same thing ever happened under this administration.

It was LibBot Nation protecting the terrorist recruitment operation in Benghazi that really started to show the full assimilation process at work.

Just a shame  the previous administration wrecked Libya beyond all recognition.





Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: Rage Against the McKee on November 14, 2019, 08:15:12 AM
When is the last time the LibBot Leadership didn't go all in on something only to have it be a nothing causing even more  :curse: because they didn't get the outcome they demanded?

It's been years, but the doubling, tripling . . . down will continue unabated.


Tell us more about Benghazi

Yes we all remember when an administration tried to claim a YouTube video killed an Ambassador (surrounded by CIA special operators, in a city filled with fresh recruits to be sent to Syria for the next regime change attempt). 

oh man i remember this

closed door depositions

hours and hours of private testimony

2 years of investigation

resulting in...

President Donald Trump
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: Cire on November 14, 2019, 09:33:02 AM
"It's not a crime if it didn't work!"
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: Cire on November 14, 2019, 09:33:31 AM
"It's not a crime if you didn't get away with it"

-Actual quotes from Gym Jordan
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: I_have_purplewood on November 14, 2019, 11:00:09 AM
"It's not a crime if you didn't get away with it"

-Actual quotes from Gym Jordan

"Hearsay can be much better than real evidence"   Rep. Mike Quigley
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: LickNeckey on November 14, 2019, 11:29:00 AM
"It's not a crime if you didn't get away with it"

-Actual quotes from Gym Jordan

"Hearsay can be much better than real evidence"   Rep. Mike Quigley

this is clearly dumb  :cheers:
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: 8manpick on November 14, 2019, 11:41:31 AM
Post the vids, purpledick

Because your memory is so short 8manprick?
That is uncalled for, your username is a clear phallic reference, mine is not.

Please post the videos of the Democratic equivalent of the Jordan tantrum from either the Kavanaugh or Mueller hearings. Otherwise, do the honorable thing and acknowledge your tap out.
(https://media1.giphy.com/media/3o6vXR0zCclXmWTRfy/giphy.gif)
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: star seed 7 on November 14, 2019, 11:43:03 AM
I think he just got confused about kav's drunken outbursts and attributed them to a democrat  :dunno:
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: sonofdaxjones on November 14, 2019, 11:51:42 AM
 :lol: :lol: Is it any wonder why LibBot Leadership is so desperate to not have their dealings in the Ukraine investigated.   

Not to mention the strident "leadership" of President Stand Down who was fully aware of all the wrong doing and yet merely referred any questions to Joe Biden's office, really nipping the corruption in the bud . . . par for the course with President Stand Down.

https://twitter.com/MichaelCoudrey/status/1194782104250249217?s=20
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: Cire on November 14, 2019, 01:00:51 PM
We're on to whatabouting John Kerry now
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: LickNeckey on November 14, 2019, 01:25:25 PM
"It's not a crime if you didn't get away with it"

-Actual quotes from Gym Jordan

"Hearsay can be much better than real evidence"   Rep. Mike Quigley

it would be better to hear from direct sources

who is instructing them not to testify?
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: sonofdaxjones on November 14, 2019, 01:26:43 PM
We're on to whatabouting John Kerry now

Dumb look (as usual) cire
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: I_have_purplewood on November 14, 2019, 02:39:30 PM
Post the vids, purpledick

Because your memory is so short 8manprick?
That is uncalled for, your username is a clear phallic reference, mine is not.

Please post the videos of the Democratic equivalent of the Jordan tantrum from either the Kavanaugh or Mueller hearings. Otherwise, do the honorable thing and acknowledge your tap out.
(https://media1.giphy.com/media/3o6vXR0zCclXmWTRfy/giphy.gif)
:lol: :lol: (ftp://:lol: :lol:)
First thing my name is based off the football teams piece of wood that says, "family" weirdo.  If you want to make into some phallic thing that's your biz.  Second, I don't have the time to go back and prove to you that many dems had meltdowns at both those hearings.  We both know they did.  And to say Jordan had a tantrum is hilarious.  That $!#* from Alaska was way worse in her so called grilling of Judge Kavanaugh than Jordan ever was. My god.
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: I_have_purplewood on November 14, 2019, 02:47:49 PM
"It's not a crime if you didn't get away with it"

-Actual quotes from Gym Jordan

"Hearsay can be much better than real evidence"   Rep. Mike Quigley

it would be better to hear from direct sources

who is instructing them not to testify?

I'm not sure but I would agree with you.
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: Rage Against the McKee on November 14, 2019, 02:54:48 PM
It really is a shame that all of these people who could exonerate Trump keep getting told not to testify by the white house.
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: star seed 7 on November 14, 2019, 03:01:45 PM
Both of Alaska's senators are republicans  :confused:
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: I_have_purplewood on November 14, 2019, 03:18:13 PM
Both of Alaska's senators are republicans  :confused:

Meant Hawaii, sorry.  Mazie Hirono is her name.
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: Institutional Control on November 14, 2019, 03:24:41 PM
:lol: :lol: (ftp://:lol: :lol:)
First thing my name is based off the football teams piece of wood that says, "family" weirdo.  If you want to make into some phallic thing that's your biz.  Second, I don't have the time to go back and prove to you that many dems had meltdowns at both those hearings.  We both know they did.  And to say Jordan had a tantrum is hilarious.  That $!#* from Alaska was way worse in her so called grilling of Judge Kavanaugh than Jordan ever was. My god.

Mods, please check to make sure this is not another gato27 sock account.
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: 8manpick on November 14, 2019, 03:39:22 PM
"That $!#*":

https://youtu.be/QaPPzgNJ37E
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: Institutional Control on November 14, 2019, 03:48:17 PM
"That $!#*":

https://youtu.be/QaPPzgNJ37E

She almost raised her voice once. 
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: I_have_purplewood on November 14, 2019, 03:50:58 PM
"That $!#*":

https://youtu.be/QaPPzgNJ37E

She almost raised her voice once.

Not the piece I was referring to but nice try.
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: Institutional Control on November 14, 2019, 03:54:09 PM
"That $!#*":

https://youtu.be/QaPPzgNJ37E

She almost raised her voice once.

Not the piece I was referring to but nice try.

Must have been this clip where she really ripped into him.

https://youtu.be/_AyP6ksRS1U

lol
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: I_have_purplewood on November 14, 2019, 04:04:58 PM
"That $!#*":

https://youtu.be/QaPPzgNJ37E

She almost raised her voice once.

Not the piece I was referring to but nice try.

Must have been this clip where she really ripped into him.

https://youtu.be/_AyP6ksRS1U

lol

Nope but keep going please.  Such a burn.  lol
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: Institutional Control on November 14, 2019, 04:08:59 PM
I'm done going, gato27.  You win with your overwhelming evidence to prove your point.

You won the internets today.
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: gatoveintisiete on November 14, 2019, 04:54:30 PM
nice tapout
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: Phil Titola on November 14, 2019, 05:01:24 PM
Imagine being mad that Donald Trump is being impeached as president of the united states of america.
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: steve dave on November 14, 2019, 05:09:16 PM
Holy crap


https://twitter.com/jonlovett/status/1195104681325785088


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: wetwillie on November 14, 2019, 05:12:42 PM
How did two bros from New York find themselves here? Desire for power is a funny animal.
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: Dugout DickStone on November 14, 2019, 05:14:16 PM
Holy crap


https://twitter.com/jonlovett/status/1195104681325785088


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

dax is furiously wokring on ways to turn on giuliani after defending him
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: waks on November 14, 2019, 05:28:58 PM
nice tapout
The burden of proof lies with the person making the claim, dumbass.
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: sonofdaxjones on November 14, 2019, 06:53:40 PM
I defended Rudy?   :confused:
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: LickNeckey on November 14, 2019, 07:26:57 PM
I defended Rudy?   :confused:

the fact that Dax finds Rudy indefensible is probably not a good sign
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: I_have_purplewood on November 14, 2019, 08:04:12 PM
I'm done going, gato27.  You win with your overwhelming evidence to prove your point.

You won the internets today.

Good for you, you're smarter than I thought you were.  Why would I scour the internet to find the clip that may or may not be there to prove a point to you?  And this after someone stating an assumption that was totally subjective in nature?  So many people on this site don't provide footnotes but when it doesn't agree with you.....?..you need one badly.  Such a joke.  Not sure who gato27 is?  I'm guessing because I don't agree with your view or because I called someone a $!#* that you're up in arms!!  How old are you?  Seriously, grow up my friend.  I don't like Trump but I do back the Republican party.  There are just as many eff-ups on the dem side as the the pub side, at least I can admit to that. 
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: steve dave on November 14, 2019, 08:35:59 PM
lmao


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: I_have_purplewood on November 14, 2019, 08:56:52 PM
lmao


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Glad you thought it was funny..  Don't you have some farm questions to answer?   :jerk: :jerk: (ftp://:jerk: :jerk:)
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: LickNeckey on November 14, 2019, 09:28:35 PM
Farm question.

What is the overall cost of the farm bailout necessitated by our very good and cool trade war.?
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: gatoveintisiet on November 14, 2019, 09:35:58 PM
snitches get stitches
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: catastrophe on November 14, 2019, 11:30:44 PM
Wow imagine being Giuliani’s attorney.
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: waks on November 15, 2019, 03:12:26 AM
I'm done going, gato27.  You win with your overwhelming evidence to prove your point.

You won the internets today.

Good for you, you're smarter than I thought you were.  Why would I scour the internet to find the clip that may or may not be there to prove a point to you?  And this after someone stating an assumption that was totally subjective in nature?  So many people on this site don't provide footnotes but when it doesn't agree with you.....?..you need one badly.  Such a joke.  Not sure who gato27 is?  I'm guessing because I don't agree with your view or because I called someone a $!#* that you're up in arms!!  How old are you?  Seriously, grow up my friend.  I don't like Trump but I do back the Republican party.  There are just as many eff-ups on the dem side as the the pub side, at least I can admit to that.
:lol: :lol: :lol:

You're asking for sources and footnotes but not only did you initially get the person you were calling a $!#* wrong, you can't provide a shred of evidence to the event in which you are describing. Take a lap, dude.
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: steve dave on November 15, 2019, 07:45:09 AM
this made me lol

https://twitter.com/maggieserota/status/1195192413796675584
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: sonofdaxjones on November 15, 2019, 07:53:29 AM
AOC reaffirms on CNN that this is all about the 2020 election. 

I do give LibBot Leadership credit for being so brazen in admitting that and a refreshing, albeit brief moment of honesty from LibBot Leadership.



Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: Dugout DickStone on November 15, 2019, 08:11:40 AM
Glad Dax and I agree that Rudy is an idiot and liar.
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: sonofdaxjones on November 15, 2019, 08:19:08 AM
Glad Dax and I agree that Rudy is an idiot and liar.

SlowDugFlection:  11:10
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: Rage Against the McKee on November 15, 2019, 09:10:15 AM
I'm done going, gato27.  You win with your overwhelming evidence to prove your point.

You won the internets today.

Good for you, you're smarter than I thought you were.  Why would I scour the internet to find the clip that may or may not be there to prove a point to you?  And this after someone stating an assumption that was totally subjective in nature?  So many people on this site don't provide footnotes but when it doesn't agree with you.....?..you need one badly.  Such a joke.  Not sure who gato27 is?  I'm guessing because I don't agree with your view or because I called someone a $!#* that you're up in arms!!  How old are you?  Seriously, grow up my friend.  I don't like Trump but I do back the Republican party.  There are just as many eff-ups on the dem side as the the pub side, at least I can admit to that.
:lol: :lol: :lol:

You're asking for sources and footnotes but not only did you initially get the person you were calling a $!#* wrong, you can't provide a shred of evidence to the event in which you are describing. Take a lap, dude.

Facebook must have deleted it. :frown:
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: Dugout DickStone on November 15, 2019, 09:36:29 AM
I can literally predict every incoming incel post.  It’s a gift
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: sonofdaxjones on November 15, 2019, 09:39:33 AM
I can literally predict every incoming incel post.  It’s a gift

Emoting forth the usual gurgling is predicting nothing.

SlowDug gonna SlowDug SMDH

Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: steve dave on November 15, 2019, 10:46:12 AM
https://twitter.com/bretbaier/status/1195364536326541313


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: sonofdaxjones on November 15, 2019, 11:05:34 AM
Ambassador's serve at the leisure of the president.

Unfortunately the dumbass Republican's likely can't or won't get into what she was doing to protect the corrupt Dem operations in the Ukraine. 

Sad
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: bucket on November 15, 2019, 11:07:49 AM
Ambassador's serve at the leisure of the president.

Unfortunately the dumbass Republican's likely can't or won't get into what she was doing to protect the corrupt Dem operations in the Ukraine. 

Sad

 :lol:

Why wouldn't they ask her, Einstein?
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: sonofdaxjones on November 15, 2019, 11:12:02 AM
Ambassador's serve at the leisure of the president.

Unfortunately the dumbass Republican's likely can't or won't get into what she was doing to protect the corrupt Dem operations in the Ukraine. 

Sad

 :lol:

Why wouldn't they ask her, Einstein?

What part of "dumbass" is confusing  you?
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: bucket on November 15, 2019, 11:14:54 AM
Ambassador's serve at the leisure of the president.

Unfortunately the dumbass Republican's likely can't or won't get into what she was doing to protect the corrupt Dem operations in the Ukraine. 

Sad

 :lol:

Why wouldn't they ask her, Einstein?

What part of "dumbass" is confusing  you?

Ya, they probably overlooked that part.
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: catastrophe on November 15, 2019, 11:16:01 AM
https://twitter.com/bretbaier/status/1195364536326541313


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

But is it really witness tampering if you do it when they’re already witnessing?
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: sonofdaxjones on November 15, 2019, 11:23:42 AM
https://twitter.com/hale_razor/status/1195381131488550913?s=21
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: catastrophe on November 15, 2019, 12:04:19 PM
Called it!
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: Dugout DickStone on November 15, 2019, 12:13:55 PM
I’m like the incel whisperer
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: steve dave on November 15, 2019, 12:46:20 PM
https://twitter.com/marisakabas/status/1195373472437952512


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: LickNeckey on November 15, 2019, 12:54:21 PM
i would probs get pretty emotional myself if I had to defend my love of beer
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: sonofdaxjones on November 15, 2019, 12:57:58 PM
I’m like the incel whisperer

SlowDug just tries so very hard, RainMan like in every way.

Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: Dr Rick Daris on November 15, 2019, 12:58:42 PM
I just skimmed it and near as I can tell there is nothing in the constitution about intimidating a witness on twitter while they are giving testimony so  :dunno:
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: mocat on November 15, 2019, 01:24:14 PM
https://twitter.com/hale_razor/status/1195381131488550913?s=21

lol, this is the account dax posts to the political facebook thread all the time
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: Institutional Control on November 15, 2019, 01:49:53 PM
https://twitter.com/pugsandco/status/1195428181840453636?s=20
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: star seed 7 on November 15, 2019, 01:58:58 PM
Gym Jordan is just incapable of not embarrassing himself
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: steve dave on November 15, 2019, 02:28:11 PM
Known liberal tabloid WSJ


https://twitter.com/rebeccaballhaus/status/1195404094778859520


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: sonofdaxjones on November 15, 2019, 02:42:17 PM
https://twitter.com/QTRResearch/status/1195419164468502530?s=20
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: steve dave on November 15, 2019, 02:51:48 PM
Boom


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: Institutional Control on November 15, 2019, 02:54:22 PM
I will not be voting for Hunter Biden now.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: sonofdaxjones on November 15, 2019, 02:57:42 PM
The point of course being (which is absolutely no surprise that resident LibBot and Fake Centrists don't get it) is that the previous administration was extremely concerned about what the Bidens were up to, but now your guy Schiff is trying to block all questioning in regard to that matter which then of course flows right into Ukrainian corruption in general.

On one hand, you're pulling out all the BS about how so very very concerned the previous administration was about corruption in the Ukraine and how so very very right there were to be concerned.   But the current administration apparently can't have any concerns.

But, you guys are too stupid to understand this.



Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: Dugout DickStone on November 15, 2019, 03:02:05 PM
Let’s out those people who don’t think Ukrainian corruption should be investigated!

:placeshandgentlyonmuzzle:
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: sonofdaxjones on November 15, 2019, 03:06:06 PM
Let’s out those people who don’t think Ukrainian corruption should be investigated!

:placeshandgentlyonmuzzle:

1.  All of LibBot Nation (unless they think it will make Trump look bad . . . not so much if it makes a LibBot Leader look bad)

Oh oh, wait, once again SlowDug thinks I was just talking about the LibDerps on this board.   Always gotta talk slow for . . . SlowDug
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: mocat on November 15, 2019, 03:46:46 PM
it's not quite as good as when ksuw used to speak for "the Left" but i do like it when dax speaks for LibBot Nation
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: Dr Rick Daris on November 15, 2019, 03:47:37 PM
i'm all for looking into and investigating crazy crap. it's p fun. I just don't get why the president of the united states would try to get the Ukraine government to do it when he is the president of the united states of America. it would be like LeBron asking a third grader that's never played basketball before to sub for him in game 7. Ukraine intelleigence? I mean   :ROFL:
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: gatoveintisiete on November 15, 2019, 03:57:18 PM
Yes, why not have Obama holdovers do the investigation?
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: gatoveintisiete on November 15, 2019, 03:59:03 PM
Trust and don't verify I always say
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: catastrophe on November 15, 2019, 04:05:11 PM
Really just relying on Giuliani to do anything is a red flag.
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: Rage Against the McKee on November 15, 2019, 04:09:40 PM
Yes, why not have Obama holdovers do the investigation?

Or the never Trumpers that Trump appointed, for that matter.
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: steve dave on November 15, 2019, 04:35:43 PM
Really just relying on Giuliani to do anything is a red flag.

Have you seen the types of people Trump surrounds himself with? Even the ones not already in jail are just awful and stupid people. Rudy is about avg in that group.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: Katpappy on November 15, 2019, 04:40:37 PM
this made me lol

https://twitter.com/maggieserota/status/1195192413796675584

Gawd is she dumb!!!  Attempted bribery is Failed bribery, but it's still bribery.  You know, I thought some lib were stupid with their ideas but Pubs have some very stupid folks running the show.   
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: sonofdaxjones on November 15, 2019, 05:46:11 PM
i'm all for looking into and investigating crazy crap. it's p fun. I just don't get why the president(s) of the united states would try to get the Ukraine government to do it when he is the president of the united states of America. it would be like LeBron asking a third grader that's never played basketball before to sub for him in game 7. Ukraine intelleigence? I mean   :ROFL:

Fixed your post.

I know understanding the whole history of a situation is not a resident LibDerp strong-point (which is not surprising in the least), but you guys should give it a try sometime..

Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: Cire on November 15, 2019, 06:36:20 PM
Whaddabout presidents


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: Katpappy on November 15, 2019, 06:51:19 PM
i'm all for looking into and investigating crazy crap. it's p fun. I just don't get why the president of the united states would try to get the Ukraine government to do it when he is the president of the united states of America. it would be like LeBron asking a third grader that's never played basketball before to sub for him in game 7. Ukraine intelleigence? I mean   :ROFL:

Not to be over obvious, but if Trump can get a excommie county to find corruption in the Dems it would be a boost in his 2020 reelection.  It would be great for him to brag how he was innocent of corruption, but those Dems...  :nono:
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: bucket on November 15, 2019, 07:41:04 PM
i'm all for looking into and investigating crazy crap. it's p fun. I just don't get why the president of the united states would try to get the Ukraine government to do it when he is the president of the united states of America. it would be like LeBron asking a third grader that's never played basketball before to sub for him in game 7. Ukraine intelleigence? I mean   :ROFL:

Not to be over obvious, but if Trump can get a excommie county to find corruption in the Dems it would be a boost in his 2020 reelection.  It would be great for him to brag how he was innocent of corruption, but those Dems...  :nono:

Not to be over obvious, but if Trump can investigate corruption in Russia that'd be great.
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: Katpappy on November 15, 2019, 08:10:51 PM
i'm all for looking into and investigating crazy crap. it's p fun. I just don't get why the president of the united states would try to get the Ukraine government to do it when he is the president of the united states of America. it would be like LeBron asking a third grader that's never played basketball before to sub for him in game 7. Ukraine intelleigence? I mean   :ROFL:

Not to be over obvious, but if Trump can get a excommie county to find corruption in the Dems it would be a boost in his 2020 reelection.  It would be great for him to brag how he was innocent of corruption, but those Dems...  :nono:

Not to be over obvious, but if Trump can investigate corruption in Russia that'd be great.

Could you imagine how bad it would be if he tried to get Putin involved.
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: steve dave on November 15, 2019, 09:05:58 PM
holy crap

https://twitter.com/CarolLeonnig/status/1195533621177802756
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: steve dave on November 15, 2019, 09:07:59 PM
what on earth

https://twitter.com/VickyPJWard/status/1195530306759135232
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: SkinnyBenny on November 15, 2019, 09:08:23 PM
holy crap

https://twitter.com/CarolLeonnig/status/1195533621177802756

SD does that actually surprise you?
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: steve dave on November 15, 2019, 09:11:28 PM
I guess it surprises me that they are stupid enough to think people wouldn't find out. but I guess that shouldn't surprise me at this point.
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: Institutional Control on November 16, 2019, 07:24:18 AM
https://twitter.com/mkraju/status/1195479909159854080?s=21


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: Dugout DickStone on November 16, 2019, 08:44:08 AM
 :daxletsoutaplaintiffnickerasigivehimanapple:
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: star seed 7 on November 19, 2019, 12:07:47 PM
Gym Jordan is just incapable of not embarrassing himself

 :lol:
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: steve dave on November 19, 2019, 03:52:41 PM
lmao

https://twitter.com/atrupar/status/1196907567215190017
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: steve dave on November 19, 2019, 04:12:34 PM
This is the trump ringer, lmao


https://twitter.com/geoffrbennett/status/1196892235264077825


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: Dugout DickStone on November 19, 2019, 04:38:06 PM
just another never trumper smh
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: catastrophe on November 19, 2019, 04:42:18 PM
I’ve said it a million times but it’s just tragic that the only people with good stuff to say can not testify due to stupid executive privilege. :curse:
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: star seed 7 on November 19, 2019, 04:51:15 PM
This is the trump ringer, lmao


https://twitter.com/geoffrbennett/status/1196892235264077825


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

He also said that an investigation into Biden would be inappropriate. This is the republicans' witness
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: star seed 7 on November 19, 2019, 05:58:53 PM
Gym Jordan is just incapable of not embarrassing himself

 :lol:

Now yelling at his own requested witness
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: steve dave on November 19, 2019, 06:05:53 PM
lmao


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: bucket on November 20, 2019, 08:09:52 AM
 :bwpopcorn:

Today is shaping up to be good.
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: steve dave on November 20, 2019, 09:05:01 AM
Holy crap Sondland

:sdeek:


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: star seed 7 on November 20, 2019, 09:09:10 AM
Live look-in to texags.com rn

(https://thumbs.gfycat.com/CautiousCreamyCat-size_restricted.gif)
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: Brock Landers on November 20, 2019, 09:11:56 AM
"Everyone was in the loop"

Goddam this is glorious.  Sondland is wrecking crap.
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: steve dave on November 20, 2019, 09:12:03 AM
Why would this obvious deep state never trumper donate $1m to the Trump campaign?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: chum1 on November 20, 2019, 09:13:05 AM
All his CYAing is confirmation that everything was absolutely as shady as everyone already knows it was.
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: steve dave on November 20, 2019, 09:15:24 AM
lmao, he brought receipts. thank you for attending the Landon lecture series anyway Mike Pompeo.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: Brock Landers on November 20, 2019, 09:18:22 AM
What model of bus has the most ground clearance?  Because Sondland just threw a whole bunch of people under it.
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: steve dave on November 20, 2019, 09:23:21 AM
https://twitter.com/ashleyalese/status/1197171231377821697


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: chum1 on November 20, 2019, 09:25:15 AM
Pompeo, Pompeo, Pompeo. I enjoyed the "talk to Rudy" stuff.
Title: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: 8manpick on November 20, 2019, 09:41:20 AM
I just can’t believe that the Clintons were able to pay off Sondland to make all this up. I thought he was already rich?
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: bucket on November 20, 2019, 09:43:11 AM
https://twitter.com/Acosta/status/1197173683783159808

 :D
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: steve dave on November 20, 2019, 09:45:44 AM
https://twitter.com/mikescollins/status/1197170888753451010


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: catastrophe on November 20, 2019, 09:46:21 AM
Might have another emergency physical attack.
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: Institutional Control on November 20, 2019, 09:47:42 AM
I just can’t believe that the Clintons were able to pay off Sondland to make all this up. I thought he was already rich?
Sondland probably got scared they would suicide him.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: sys on November 20, 2019, 10:24:03 AM
well goddamn, mr. sondland.
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: sys on November 20, 2019, 10:31:22 AM
https://twitter.com/AdamWeinstein/status/1197186372819410944
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: star seed 7 on November 20, 2019, 10:44:13 AM
Yikes, castor is absolutely flailing
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: gatoveintisiete on November 20, 2019, 10:47:36 AM
whats going on here, did you you guys get his ass or something?
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: LickNeckey on November 20, 2019, 11:28:11 AM
(https://images.scribblelive.com/2019/11/20/37ef1a48-02ca-4169-acc5-f833fb9abb30_800.jpg)

Dax if you haven't gotten these in your chain email yet
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: Brock Landers on November 20, 2019, 11:32:58 AM
Incredibly childlike, both in words and handwriting.
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: Dugout DickStone on November 20, 2019, 11:46:30 AM
jfc he gave a million to trump? 
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: DaBigTrain on November 20, 2019, 12:03:26 PM
Hold on...I thought Trump/Rudy/Stone/Manafort/Flynn/Pompeo/etc did nothing wrong? :confused:
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: sys on November 20, 2019, 12:06:26 PM
https://twitter.com/helaineolen/status/1197208603523989504
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: steve dave on November 20, 2019, 12:32:50 PM
lmao


https://twitter.com/aravosis/status/1197184057249062915


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: gatoveintisiete on November 20, 2019, 12:35:13 PM
That looks pretty damning :ohno:

(the getty image)
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: Cire on November 20, 2019, 12:39:15 PM
quid pro quo's happen all the time in every administration.

The real crimes were exonerated by Meuller
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: steve dave on November 20, 2019, 12:48:27 PM
Rudy’s about to flip


https://twitter.com/rudygiuliani/status/1197224271887634432


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: mocat on November 20, 2019, 12:51:45 PM
lmao

https://twitter.com/Ike_Saul/status/1197177426272563202?s=19
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: star seed 7 on November 20, 2019, 12:56:06 PM
Naw, Rudy is all in, going with trump's normal "I don't know him" defense

https://twitter.com/RudyGiuliani/status/1197219380792352768
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: star seed 7 on November 20, 2019, 12:56:54 PM
Gym Jordan starts out yelling  :lol:  just an amazing representation of maga
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: sys on November 20, 2019, 12:58:36 PM
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/EJ1WvyOXUAE3gSc?format=jpg&name=large)
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: Dugout DickStone on November 20, 2019, 12:59:15 PM
lmao

https://twitter.com/Ike_Saul/status/1197177426272563202?s=19

Holy crap facts and logic self owned
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: Dugout DickStone on November 20, 2019, 01:02:29 PM
Did Dax go to texags?
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: chum1 on November 20, 2019, 01:11:27 PM
https://twitter.com/RyanLizza/status/1197189935213817857
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: LickNeckey on November 20, 2019, 01:13:39 PM
pffft

apparently you didn't see the Clinton Foundation bombshell he dropped today
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: chum1 on November 20, 2019, 01:18:42 PM
That looks pretty damning :ohno:

(the getty image)

https://twitter.com/mattyglesias/status/1197205480495632386
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: star seed 7 on November 20, 2019, 01:19:34 PM
I mean, republicans literally elected the literal leader of the birther movement who also literally suggested that one of his primary opponent's father was involved in the jfk assassination.
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: Rage Against the McKee on November 20, 2019, 01:32:46 PM
https://twitter.com/kylegriffin1/status/1197192997835808769
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: LickNeckey on November 20, 2019, 01:47:42 PM
man the libbot neverTrumpers sure are multiplying
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: mocat on November 20, 2019, 01:57:08 PM
WHAT A WITCH HUNT
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: Cire on November 20, 2019, 02:04:51 PM
just got off the phone with Dax who's painting his attic.
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: chum1 on November 20, 2019, 02:18:10 PM
Holy crap Maloney.
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: Tobias on November 20, 2019, 02:27:00 PM
hopefully this gets dax back here
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: star seed 7 on November 20, 2019, 02:31:59 PM
He'll storm back when the epoch times tells him how all of this is fake
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: star seed 7 on November 20, 2019, 02:37:09 PM
WHAT A WITCH HUNT

Just noticed Nunes is a high hills'r
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: chum1 on November 20, 2019, 02:54:59 PM
Holy crap Maloney.

Sondland tried to turn on the charm and Maloney punched him.

https://twitter.com/atrupar/status/1197250139204837377
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: bucket on November 20, 2019, 03:03:03 PM
https://twitter.com/KevinMKruse/status/1197228427033612289

Got'em, Gym!   :thumbs:
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: mocat on November 20, 2019, 03:04:58 PM
such theater!
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: mocat on November 20, 2019, 03:08:35 PM
WHAT A WITCH HUNT

Just noticed Nunes is a high hills'r

gross
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: DaBigTrain on November 20, 2019, 03:15:23 PM
It’s sad that in Trumps most desperate hour his loyalist of followers like Dax is nowhere to be found.
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: chum1 on November 20, 2019, 03:19:59 PM
It's the same every time. They all need a bit of time to huddle in order to formulate talking points and get on the same page.
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: mocat on November 20, 2019, 03:26:10 PM
sondland is unreliable/lying boom how hard was that dax sheesh
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: Rage Against the McKee on November 20, 2019, 03:27:39 PM
What kind of name is Sondland, anyway? Sounds foreign.
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: bucket on November 20, 2019, 03:30:40 PM
https://twitter.com/ryanjreilly/status/1197228102704943111
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: chum1 on November 20, 2019, 03:37:15 PM
That's very good.
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: sys on November 20, 2019, 03:45:07 PM
he may be a complete criminal maga, but i like this sondland dude.  he's a star.

https://twitter.com/Viror12/status/1197267704580890626
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: Institutional Control on November 20, 2019, 04:04:01 PM
I loved Soundland in Groundhog Day!

(https://uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/20191120/68b3ef7f6dacfbf9d67306a30763da8b.jpg)


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: catastrophe on November 20, 2019, 04:56:16 PM
https://twitter.com/KevinMKruse/status/1197228427033612289

Got'em, Gym!   :thumbs:

This really is probably the Jim Jordanest moment.
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: Rage Against the McKee on November 20, 2019, 05:11:38 PM
https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/trump-impeachment-inquiry/live-blog/nov-20-impeachment-hearings-live-updates-n1086301/ncrd1086696#liveBlogHeader

Quote
Nunes also said that Gordon Sondland, U.S. ambassador to Ukraine, was testifying at the hearing “to be smeared” — not addressing any of the issues raised in Sondland's opening statement.

Nunes thought this testimony was going to be a lot different.
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: gatoveintisiete on November 20, 2019, 07:07:18 PM
Remember this morning when you guys thought Trump was really going to get removed from office, that was pretty great.
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: gatoveintisiete on November 20, 2019, 07:08:43 PM
Live look-in to texags.com rn

(https://thumbs.gfycat.com/CautiousCreamyCat-size_restricted.gif)

 :lol:
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: gatoveintisiete on November 20, 2019, 07:09:25 PM
Holy crap Sondland

:sdeek:


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 :lol:
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: gatoveintisiete on November 20, 2019, 07:10:06 PM
What model of bus has the most ground clearance?  Because Sondland just threw a whole bunch of people under it.

 :lol:
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: gatoveintisiete on November 20, 2019, 07:10:30 PM
lmao, he brought receipts. thank you for attending the Landon lecture series anyway Mike Pompeo.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 :lol:
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: gatoveintisiete on November 20, 2019, 07:11:14 PM
I just can’t believe that the Clintons were able to pay off Sondland to make all this up. I thought he was already rich?

 :lol:
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: gatoveintisiete on November 20, 2019, 07:11:38 PM
https://twitter.com/mikescollins/status/1197170888753451010


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 :lol:
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: gatoveintisiete on November 20, 2019, 07:12:17 PM
well goddamn, mr. sondland.

 :lol:
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: gatoveintisiete on November 20, 2019, 07:17:54 PM
Sad you don't understand the difference between foreign aid and White House visits  :Ugh:
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: steve dave on November 20, 2019, 07:19:47 PM
tubesock taking this in stride


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: gatoveintisiete on November 20, 2019, 07:29:18 PM
Amaze
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: catastrophe on November 20, 2019, 09:00:19 PM
Not melting down at all
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: Institutional Control on November 20, 2019, 09:32:24 PM
Tubesock27 in this thread.

(https://uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/20191121/24864f3a8d23f5a4e9ce6ac5a3fc6ff1.jpg)


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: Spracne on November 20, 2019, 10:00:28 PM
Tubesock27 in this thread.

(https://uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/20191121/24864f3a8d23f5a4e9ce6ac5a3fc6ff1.jpg)


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
I just bought $100 of kin so I could give it all to you
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: michigancat on November 21, 2019, 12:13:23 AM
he may be a complete criminal maga, but i like this sondland dude.  he's a star.

https://twitter.com/Viror12/status/1197267704580890626
Yeah he seemed like a really likeable guy for a maga criminal. Like he would be the life of any party he's at.
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: steve dave on November 21, 2019, 07:51:45 AM
Oh?


https://twitter.com/woodruffbets/status/1197323818945175552


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: Institutional Control on November 21, 2019, 08:01:16 AM
https://twitter.com/alexblagg/status/1197206003449659392?s=20
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: steve dave on November 21, 2019, 08:18:38 AM
https://twitter.com/pv_gia/status/1197204536663924736


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: Rage Against the McKee on November 21, 2019, 08:21:21 AM
That is a really nice photo. Props to Sondland for finding the camera there.
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: mocat on November 21, 2019, 08:24:44 AM
irl thought it was shopped at first glance
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: steve dave on November 21, 2019, 08:36:34 AM
Reminder


https://twitter.com/billkristol/status/1197211419038691328


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: Rage Against the McKee on November 21, 2019, 08:51:11 AM
You can't show Lindsey a quid pro quo if he keeps his eyes shut. Checkmate.
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: 8manpick on November 21, 2019, 08:54:19 AM
Sorry Steve, those goalposts were moved back long ago
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: catastrophe on November 21, 2019, 09:03:59 AM
The flailing is fun to watch as a person but p sad as an American.
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: Institutional Control on November 21, 2019, 09:16:14 AM
https://twitter.com/dandrezner/status/1197533817495588867?s=20
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: chum1 on November 21, 2019, 09:41:11 AM
Lol Trump moment: when Sondland called Trump, he announced that he was in Kiev and Trump then needed to clarify that he was in Ukraine (pushing the Biden investigation).
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: chum1 on November 21, 2019, 09:51:41 AM
It's awesome that Bolton and Sondland each talked at the time about how Rudy is giant eff up and how he'd ruin everything.
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: DaBigTrain on November 21, 2019, 10:01:46 AM
Only the best.
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: LickNeckey on November 21, 2019, 10:10:40 AM
https://twitter.com/dandrezner/status/1197533817495588867?s=20

Dax could you please elighten Ms. Hill to the actions of the Chalupa.
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: star seed 7 on November 21, 2019, 10:13:29 AM
That part about A$AP Rocky was pretty gross "just let him get charged then use the race card" "at least you can tell the Kardashians you tried"
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: sonofdaxjones on November 21, 2019, 11:20:54 AM
I'm looking forward to the error of unquestioned foreign aid given with no stipulation, demand or expectation of change.

Let's make it rain U.S. dollars across the world!!

It is going to be a sad day for some LibBots who just explode when (insert country/leader they don't like and or weird political dynamic in the U.S. they don't like which pretty much everything that doesn't agree with them 1000% on everything) just gets uncle sam peeling off Benjamin's.

This includes Tarmac Billions.

Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: star seed 7 on November 21, 2019, 11:24:22 AM
Dax has given up  :frown:
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: IPA4Me on November 21, 2019, 11:31:55 AM
Here dax. Just for you.

https://twitter.com/1oneLmichele/status/1197529208685248513?s=19

Sent from my Moto G (4) using Tapatalk

Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: star seed 7 on November 21, 2019, 11:34:40 AM
This admin is such a rough ridin' joke

https://twitter.com/BBCWorld/status/1197542361435398146
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: Dugout DickStone on November 21, 2019, 11:43:26 AM
I'm looking forward to the error of unquestioned foreign aid given with no stipulation, demand or expectation of change.

Let's make it rain U.S. dollars across the world!!

It is going to be a sad day for some LibBots who just explode when (insert country/leader they don't like and or weird political dynamic in the U.S. they don't like which pretty much everything that doesn't agree with them 1000% on everything) just gets uncle sam peeling off Benjamin's.

This includes Tarmac Billions.

goincel talking points are legitimately so bad now.  They need to get some smarter people involved.
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: waks on November 21, 2019, 11:47:17 AM
I'm looking forward to the error of unquestioned foreign aid given with no stipulation, demand or expectation of change.

Let's make it rain U.S. dollars across the world!!

It is going to be a sad day for some LibBots who just explode when (insert country/leader they don't like and or weird political dynamic in the U.S. they don't like which pretty much everything that doesn't agree with them 1000% on everything) just gets uncle sam peeling off Benjamin's.

This includes Tarmac Billions.
Not your best work.
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: catastrophe on November 21, 2019, 11:47:48 AM
September Dax
FTR I fully support the Executive Branch of our government investigating corruption on the part of current and form executive branch members in regards to their dealings with foreign governments as long as there's no quid-pro-quo.

October Dax
Dax, do you think there was a quid pro quo?

No, if Biden/Obama wasn't a quid pro quo than neither was this.

November Dax
I'm looking forward to the error of unquestioned foreign aid given with no stipulation, demand or expectation of change.

Let's make it rain U.S. dollars across the world!!
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: steve dave on November 21, 2019, 12:04:53 PM
lmao


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: Dugout DickStone on November 21, 2019, 12:08:22 PM
he deleted some but can't delete all
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: DaBigTrain on November 21, 2019, 12:20:41 PM
:lol:

Dax deleting posts about this is rough ridin' hilarious.
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: star seed 7 on November 21, 2019, 01:04:56 PM
These two are absolutely pummeling the republican members, it's almost uncomfortable
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: Brock Landers on November 21, 2019, 01:14:38 PM
Yeah, Fiona Hill has been windmill dunking on them all day. 
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: steve dave on November 21, 2019, 01:21:40 PM
lmao, just self own after self own


https://twitter.com/shawnhils/status/1197581877437227009


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: star seed 7 on November 21, 2019, 01:22:52 PM
They seriously would have done less damage if they just called this fake news and walked out
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: steve dave on November 21, 2019, 01:25:49 PM
lmao


https://twitter.com/atrupar/status/1197573672313200640


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: LickNeckey on November 21, 2019, 01:31:47 PM
https://twitter.com/SaoSasha/status/1197320791706263552
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: star seed 7 on November 21, 2019, 01:47:16 PM
Being shitheads to every witness has finally caught up to the Republicans. Hill just tore them apart
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: 'taterblast on November 21, 2019, 01:55:31 PM
lmao, just self own after self own


https://twitter.com/shawnhils/status/1197581877437227009


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 :lol:

Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: Cire on November 21, 2019, 02:00:35 PM
LOL
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: chum1 on November 21, 2019, 02:18:24 PM
https://twitter.com/woodruffbets/status/1197323818945175552

https://twitter.com/atrupar/status/1197607345414660098

Yessssss
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: star seed 7 on November 21, 2019, 02:20:52 PM
"would you agree that RT is putins propaganda outlet in the US?"

"yes"

Lol, this is one of dax's main sources on Russian issues
Title: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: 8manpick on November 21, 2019, 02:37:47 PM
"would you agree that RT is putins propaganda outlet in the US?"

"yes"

Lol, this is one of dax's main sources on Russian issues
Did you not notice that Dr. Hill is a huge libtard?  She is just trying to discredit ‘pub sources.
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: DaBigTrain on November 21, 2019, 03:14:18 PM
:lol:
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: sonofdaxjones on November 21, 2019, 03:54:38 PM
Yes, I read RT . . . like, never.

LibBot Nation: 

All things that contradict what we believe:  Conspiracies

All Sources not approved by us:  Russian Propaganda

LibBot Useful Idiot Nation:  Pawns
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: mocat on November 21, 2019, 03:56:46 PM
lol
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: steve dave on November 21, 2019, 04:01:25 PM
omg


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: DaBigTrain on November 21, 2019, 04:11:29 PM
(https://66.media.tumblr.com/a23a0d09a3fbb287f1c0271d67e5a729/tumblr_o183eg7Okh1tjydheo3_500.gif)
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: sonofdaxjones on November 21, 2019, 04:17:56 PM
Love the EU ambassador writing a 25 page 45 minute opening statement but leaving out the fact that he talked to Trump directly about the issue.

 :lol: :lol: :lol:

That's the kind of lifetime bureaucrat poster boy LibBot Nation can rub a few out to . . .

Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: Rage Against the McKee on November 21, 2019, 04:47:01 PM
The EU ambassador is a hotel tycoon who got his job by giving Trump $1 million, dax.
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: sonofdaxjones on November 21, 2019, 04:50:33 PM
The EU ambassador is a hotel tycoon who got his job by giving Trump $1 million, dax.

 :lol: :lol: :lol:
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: Rage Against the McKee on November 21, 2019, 04:54:22 PM
"drain the swamp" :emawkid:
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: sonofdaxjones on November 21, 2019, 04:58:33 PM
"drain the swamp" :emawkid:

LibBot Nation thought they had a winner yesterday.

Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: DaBigTrain on November 21, 2019, 05:21:36 PM
It's the same every time. They all need a bit of time to huddle in order to formulate talking points and get on the same page.

Like clockwork :lol:
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: star seed 7 on November 21, 2019, 05:29:36 PM
The EU ambassador is a hotel tycoon who got his job by giving Trump $1 million, dax.

 :lol: :lol: :lol:

Um...
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: chum1 on November 21, 2019, 05:30:41 PM
https://twitter.com/pkcapitol/status/1197650187747037184
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: sonofdaxjones on November 21, 2019, 05:33:08 PM
The thought of mega corrupt ChiCom Joe running point on the anti-corruption bureau in the Ukraine is both  :bwpopcorn: :bwpopcorn: :bwpopcorn: and  :lol: :lol: :lol:

President Stand Down so concerned about nipping corruption in the bud just told his staff to refer all questions about the mega corrupt Biden's to Biden's office.   

You can't investigate our guy! (LibBot Nation)



Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: steve dave on November 21, 2019, 06:15:35 PM
omg LMAOooooo


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: gatoveintisiet on November 21, 2019, 07:29:26 PM
Good to be back after my temporary ban.  Should we be upset if this doesn't get voted on and sent to the senate?
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: SkinnyBenny on November 21, 2019, 07:50:01 PM
Yes, because it’sclear he’s guilty af
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: gatoveintisiet on November 21, 2019, 09:19:22 PM
Then we should burn it down if they don't
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: john "teach me how to" dougie on November 21, 2019, 11:16:40 PM
LMAOooo   @ Adam schiff
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: LickNeckey on November 22, 2019, 09:44:37 AM
Love the EU ambassador writing a 25 page 45 minute opening statement but leaving out the fact that he talked to Trump directly about the issue.

 :lol: :lol: :lol:

That's the kind of lifetime bureaucrat poster boy LibBot Nation can rub a few out to . . .

so dumb
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: star seed 7 on November 22, 2019, 10:14:52 AM
Old people get confused
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: Dugout DickStone on November 22, 2019, 10:30:20 AM
F'ing dax, poor dude.  I legit feel for him.  The incel websites aren't giving him a damn thing to work with
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: 8manpick on November 22, 2019, 10:34:34 AM
There is no way Trump is getting removed based on this. It’s bad but nowhere near the standard that the senate Republicans would have needed. He’ll be impeached and not removed, the exact same as we all knew when the inquiry was announced.
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: catastrophe on November 22, 2019, 10:40:44 AM
It’s actually very very difficult to imagine what would sway Republicans at this point. The goal posts aren’t even in the same zip code as when the inquiry started.
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: waks on November 22, 2019, 10:45:16 AM
There is no way Trump is getting removed based on this. It’s bad but nowhere near the standard that the senate Republicans would have needed. He’ll be impeached and not removed, the exact same as we all knew when the inquiry was announced.
I agree but hopefully centrists are swayed enough by the proceedings to not reelect the rough rider.
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: Cire on November 22, 2019, 10:51:42 AM
Yeah this is about putting Pubs on the record than removing donald trump.

None of this would have come out without the impeachment inquiry.
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: sonofdaxjones on November 22, 2019, 11:01:10 AM
Yeah this is about putting Pubs on the record than removing donald trump.

None of this would have come out without the impeachment inquiry.

It's also about putting Dems on record.

Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: steve dave on November 22, 2019, 11:03:07 AM
What are the Dems on the record for Dax?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: star seed 7 on November 22, 2019, 11:04:10 AM
Opposing corruption, very bad in daxpublicanland
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: sonofdaxjones on November 22, 2019, 11:05:03 AM
What are the Dems on the record for Dax?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

It just feels like this has been discussed before, something along the lines of Trump should have called a special session back in the summer.

Also, remember when your leader Slurs Pelosi said she was against Impeachment?

Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: sonofdaxjones on November 22, 2019, 11:06:19 AM
Opposing corruption, very bad in daxpublicanland

Cue complete LibBot Nation meltdown whenever the mega corrupt Biden's and investigations are brought up in the same sentence.

LibBot Nation:  Bringing in the world of no questions asked foreign aid (Tarmac cash included)

Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: Dugout DickStone on November 22, 2019, 11:13:15 AM
dax, let's out the total idiots who don't want Biden investigated for being corrupt.  As a team.  Me, super young and aggressive with a razor like analytical brain. 

You old and fading, scared of technology and change but still with a vast catalog of crazy af conspiracy theories of which a solid 1% have a shred of proof.

We can do this.
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: steve dave on November 22, 2019, 11:13:49 AM
lmao


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: chum1 on November 22, 2019, 11:18:37 AM
None of this would have come out without the impeachment inquiry.

This is totally sufficient to make it worthwhile.
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: sonofdaxjones on November 22, 2019, 11:22:38 AM
dax, let's out the total idiots who don't want Biden investigated for being corrupt.  As a team.  Me, super young and aggressive with a razor like analytical brain. 

You old and fading, scared of technology and change but still with a vast catalog of crazy af conspiracy theories of which a solid 1% have a shred of proof.

We can do this.

Well Dug, it's literally like you don't follow along with anything and never see how out of their minds LibBot Nation gets whenever Biden is brought up in these proceedings.

I actually sell all of the technology that facilitates your ability to participate in this blog, so that "go to" is a little old and tired.   Please try and come up with something original . . . for once.

Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: Dugout DickStone on November 22, 2019, 11:31:30 AM
dax, let's out the total idiots who don't want Biden investigated for being corrupt.  As a team.  Me, super young and aggressive with a razor like analytical brain. 

You old and fading, scared of technology and change but still with a vast catalog of crazy af conspiracy theories of which a solid 1% have a shred of proof.

We can do this.

Well Dug, it's literally like you don't follow along with anything and never see how out of their minds LibBot Nation gets whenever Biden is brought up in these proceedings.

I actually sell all of the technology that facilitates your ability to participate in this blog, so that "go to" is a little old and tired.   Please try and come up with something original . . . for once.

I am all in for outing those posters here who are against investigating Biden's corruption.  Let's do this together!  We will ride into this battle as a team.  Me, driving the 1000cc motorcycle wide open in a full speed charge at those fools who point out that only a week ago the trumpers claimed a quid pro quo was impeachable but now have deleted that as a bench mark.  You, riding in the side car due to your arthritic hip and sitting on a donut pillow to relieve the pain from chronic hemorrhoids.

This will be an easy fight for us.
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: sonofdaxjones on November 22, 2019, 11:32:12 AM
dax, let's out the total idiots who don't want Biden investigated for being corrupt.  As a team.  Me, super young and aggressive with a razor like analytical brain. 

You old and fading, scared of technology and change but still with a vast catalog of crazy af conspiracy theories of which a solid 1% have a shred of proof.

We can do this.

Well Dug, it's literally like you don't follow along with anything and never see how out of their minds LibBot Nation gets whenever Biden is brought up in these proceedings.

I actually sell all of the technology that facilitates your ability to participate in this blog, so that "go to" is a little old and tired.   Please try and come up with something original . . . for once.

I am all in for outing those posters here who are against investigating Biden's corruption.  Let's do this together!  We will ride into this battle as a team.  Me, driving the 1000cc motorcycle wide open in a full speed charge at those fools who point out that only a week ago the trumpers claimed a quid pro quo was impeachable but now have deleted that as a bench mark.  You, riding in the side car due to your arthritic hip and sitting on a donut pillow to relieve the pain from chronic hemorrhoids.

This will be an easy fight for us.

 :lol: :lol: :lol:

Such a small little mind.

Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: Dugout DickStone on November 22, 2019, 11:41:22 AM
I am seeing a resistance to this plan of attack.  I am concerned that you possibly just come here to gripe about made up "libs" who are simply boogey men that you and fellow olds have fabricated to give you a faux target for your fear/uncertainty.

Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: Cire on November 22, 2019, 11:46:40 AM
If Biden/anyone broke laws then lock them up
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: sonofdaxjones on November 22, 2019, 11:52:52 AM
I am seeing a resistance to this plan of attack.  I am concerned that you possibly just come here to gripe about made up "libs" who are simply boogey men that you and fellow olds have fabricated to give you a faux target for your fear/uncertainty.

Such an insulated little mind . . . sad
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: Katpappy on November 22, 2019, 12:12:08 PM
dax, let's out the total idiots who don't want Biden investigated for being corrupt.  As a team.  Me, super young and aggressive with a razor like analytical brain. 

You old and fading, scared of technology and change but still with a vast catalog of crazy af conspiracy theories of which a solid 1% have a shred of proof.

We can do this.



Well Dug, it's literally like you don't follow along with anything and never see how out of their minds LibBot Nation gets whenever Biden is brought up in these proceedings.

I actually sell all of the technology that facilitates your ability to participate in this blog, so that "go to" is a little old and tired.   Please try and come up with something original . . . for once.

I am all in for outing those posters here who are against investigating Biden's corruption.  Let's do this together!  We will ride into this battle as a team.  Me, driving the 1000cc motorcycle wide open in a full speed charge at those fools who point out that only a week ago the trumpers claimed a quid pro quo was impeachable but now have deleted that as a bench mark.  You, riding in the side car due to your arthritic hip and sitting on a donut pillow to relieve the pain from chronic hemorrhoids.

This will be an easy fight for us.

JHC!!!  My gut hurts...  :ROFL: :ROFL: :ROFL: :ROFL: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: LickNeckey on November 22, 2019, 01:46:15 PM
imagine being so fluid in ones beliefs that you have to frequently delete old posts as they now contradict the current position you are trying to stake out.

all the while screaming "I know you are but what am I!!!!" as you await the next set of talking points to parrot
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: Cire on November 22, 2019, 01:49:55 PM
Dax,

Did you delete old posts?
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: Spracne on November 22, 2019, 02:00:53 PM
Dax,

Did you delete old posts?
You'll have to subpoena him to secure his testimony.
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: sonofdaxjones on November 22, 2019, 02:41:35 PM
What in the world?
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: sonofdaxjones on November 22, 2019, 02:43:08 PM
One day RESIDENT LiBBots, will understand Libbot Nation.
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: DaBigTrain on November 22, 2019, 03:15:20 PM
imagine being so fluid in ones beliefs that you have to frequently delete old posts as they now contradict the current position you are trying to stake out.

all the while screaming "I know you are but what am I!!!!" as you await the next set of talking points to parrot

Dax does complete 180’s all the time. It’s one of the funnier of his complete lack of self awareness qualities.
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: Dugout DickStone on November 22, 2019, 03:22:35 PM
to be fair to dax, if you are going to defend every idiotic thing trump says you will frequently be doing 180's.  Trump makes the job of his defenders very rough
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: sonofdaxjones on November 22, 2019, 03:30:03 PM
Deleting old posts?

Weird takes from some really angry weirdos.

Not surprised though.

Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: sonofdaxjones on November 22, 2019, 03:31:17 PM
imagine being so fluid in ones beliefs that you have to frequently delete old posts as they now contradict the current position you are trying to stake out.

all the while screaming "I know you are but what am I!!!!" as you await the next set of talking points to parrot

Dax does complete 180’s all the time. It’s one of the funnier of his complete lack of self awareness qualities.

The biggest idiot on the board attempts to weigh in . . .  :lol: :lol:
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: SkinnyBenny on November 22, 2019, 08:12:10 PM
Deleting old posts?

Weird takes from some really angry weirdos.

Not surprised though.

Now he's doing the thing he always does where he skates around the issue but never actually addresses the question head on. It's one of dax's most frequent go-to strategies.

He restates the question, feigns being aghast at the accusation, insinuates it's a weird and ridiculous accusation, but never actually answers yes or no because he knows that somehow, if he says definitively that he didn't delete posts, Saul is going to prove that he did. Or maybe chingon.
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: Spracne on November 22, 2019, 08:13:48 PM
Deleting old posts?

Weird takes from some really angry weirdos.

Not surprised though.

Now he's doing the thing he always does where he skates around the issue but never actually addresses the question head on. It's one of dax's most frequent go-to strategies.

He restates the question, feigns being aghast at the accusation, insinuates it's a weird and ridiculous accusation, but never actually answers yes or no because he knows that somehow, if he says definitively that he didn't delete posts, Saul is going to prove that he did.
It's the famous oscar Lee water technique.
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: steve dave on November 22, 2019, 08:38:37 PM
(https://uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/20191123/b5cd9fd82ecde95a436ff5161feb2119.jpg)


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: SkinnyBenny on November 22, 2019, 08:53:59 PM
Oh man, I have GOT to get The Scoop :drool:
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: Cire on November 23, 2019, 12:12:07 AM
So

Did Dax delete posts?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: SkinnyBenny on November 23, 2019, 06:46:16 AM
Pfft, did I delete posts?

Really telling that LibBotNation9.0 would rather focus on weird theories like post deletion rather than coming to grips with their sordid history of ignoring war crimes. I guess it's weird, but then again it's entirely unsurprising when you realize that all of this board's Dem Obama minions get their marching orders from mega corrupt ChiComJoe. Extremely sad.
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: bucket on November 23, 2019, 08:37:28 AM
Pfft, did I delete posts?

Really telling that LibBotNation9.0 would rather focus on weird theories like post deletion rather than coming to grips with their sordid history of ignoring war crimes. I guess it's weird, but then again it's entirely unsurprising when you realize that all of this board's Dem Obama minions get their marching orders from mega corrupt ChiComJoe. Extremely sad.

And George Soros
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: bucket on November 23, 2019, 09:54:26 AM
https://twitter.com/atrupar/status/1197891833625501696

Lock her up! Lock her up!
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: Phil Titola on November 23, 2019, 09:56:25 AM
dax, let's out the total idiots who don't want Biden investigated for being corrupt.  As a team.  Me, super young and aggressive with a razor like analytical brain. 

You old and fading, scared of technology and change but still with a vast catalog of crazy af conspiracy theories of which a solid 1% have a shred of proof.

We can do this.

Well Dug, it's literally like you don't follow along with anything and never see how out of their minds LibBot Nation gets whenever Biden is brought up in these proceedings.

I actually sell all of the technology that facilitates your ability to participate in this blog, so that "go to" is a little old and tired.   Please try and come up with something original . . . for once.

Guys dax sells technology, slow your roll, he knows stuff.

Every sales guy I know is super smart.
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: steve dave on November 23, 2019, 12:16:09 PM
https://twitter.com/helenkennedy/status/1198298153969160192?s=21


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: Katpappy on November 24, 2019, 11:12:15 AM
These assholes know he's guilty.  They just want to make it look good when they release him from impeachment.  :blindfold:
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: sonofdaxjones on November 24, 2019, 12:00:20 PM
MegaCorrupt (but apprently shouldn't be investigated at all according to LibBot Nation) ChiCom Joe going on with Don Lemon (I mean Don Lemon . . .  :lol:) and cryptically threatening Lindsey Graham?

Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: waks on November 24, 2019, 12:03:53 PM
MegaCorrupt (but apprently shouldn't be investigated at all according to LibBot Nation) ChiCom Joe going on with Don Lemon (I mean Don Lemon . . .  :lol:) and cryptically threatening Lindsey Graham?
What world are you living in that you interpreted that interview as a threat? You weirdo
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: sonofdaxjones on November 24, 2019, 12:07:51 PM
MegaCorrupt (but apprently shouldn't be investigated at all according to LibBot Nation) ChiCom Joe going on with Don Lemon (I mean Don Lemon . . .  :lol:) and cryptically threatening Lindsey Graham?
What world are you living in that you interpreted that interview as a threat? You weirdo

What part of "?" confuses you? 

Waks:  Zero to meltdown in .03 seconds (as usual)

But  :lol:  "But Lindsey is about to go down in a way that I think he's going to regret his whole life"

Not a threat, tho



Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: waks on November 24, 2019, 12:12:23 PM
MegaCorrupt (but apprently shouldn't be investigated at all according to LibBot Nation) ChiCom Joe going on with Don Lemon (I mean Don Lemon . . .  :lol:) and cryptically threatening Lindsey Graham?
What world are you living in that you interpreted that interview as a threat? You weirdo

What part of "?" confuses you? 

Waks:  Zero to meltdown in .03 seconds (as usual)

But  :lol:  "But Lindsey is about to go down in a way that I think he's going to regret his whole life"

Not a threat, tho
So you were joking, then you weren't? I'm beginning to think Slow Dug is right about your brain turning into mush. All ChiCom Joe is saying is that Lindsey is going to regret his actions later because it exposes him as a partisan hack/shill just like the rest of them. That should be easy to see for any remotely intelligent person.
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: steve dave on November 24, 2019, 12:12:48 PM
I mean, Lyndsey and the rest of the bootlickers are 100% for certain going to be on the wrong side of history here. Is there anyone left disputing that outside of fringe alt right people?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: sonofdaxjones on November 24, 2019, 12:17:04 PM
The fact that LibBot Nation wants to label everything a conspiracy is extremely telling, expected and extremely  :lol: :lol: :lol:

That doesn't change the fact that for example there were tens of millions of dollars transferred from Burisma to shell companies and other entities with Biden-Kerry-Rosement  Seneca etc. etc. somewhere in the mix.

It's pretty obvious why LibBot Nation is has turned the deflection machine up to 12 to move all of this away from the Bidens, they were on the take while Joe was VP. 

Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: sonofdaxjones on November 24, 2019, 12:20:02 PM
MegaCorrupt (but apprently shouldn't be investigated at all according to LibBot Nation) ChiCom Joe going on with Don Lemon (I mean Don Lemon . . .  :lol:) and cryptically threatening Lindsey Graham?
What world are you living in that you interpreted that interview as a threat? You weirdo

What part of "?" confuses you? 

Waks:  Zero to meltdown in .03 seconds (as usual)

But  :lol:  "But Lindsey is about to go down in a way that I think he's going to regret his whole life"

Not a threat, tho
So you were joking, then you weren't? I'm beginning to think Slow Dug is right about your brain turning into mush. All ChiCom Joe is saying is that Lindsey is going to regret his actions later because it exposes him as a partisan hack/shill just like the rest of them. That should be easy to see for any remotely intelligent person.

MegaCorrupt Joe is working the deflecting racket hard (remember, he worked in the same administration that tried to tell us a YouTube video killed a U.S. ambassador) because he knows what's going to happen if his family's (and the previous administrations) dealings in the Ukraine are truly investigated.

Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: waks on November 24, 2019, 12:22:58 PM
 :jeffy:
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: sonofdaxjones on November 24, 2019, 12:28:11 PM
:jeffy:

$3.5 million dollars from Burisma sent via Morgan Stanley to Rosement Seneca between Nov. 2014 and Nov 2015.

But that's just a conspiracy  :lol:

No illegal influence,  MegaCorrupt Joe Biden wasn't bragging about getting Shokin fired like a bar room drunk or anything.

But you keep believing Shokin was corrupt, and not the people who got him fired, that fits your narrative better and its very self-affirming, so you feel better.










Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: star seed 7 on November 24, 2019, 01:00:27 PM
Lol, grandax is at it again. We love our putin propaganda, don't we folks?
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: sonofdaxjones on November 24, 2019, 01:58:13 PM
Lol, grandax is at it again. We love our putin propaganda, don't we folks?

LibBot.9Flection:  13/10

It's pretty sad to see people like LibBot.9 so desperate to fly air cover for the mega corrupt Bidens.  SMDH

Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: sonofdaxjones on November 24, 2019, 02:16:57 PM
Geoffrey Pyatt telling Shokin in the summer of 2015 that Shokin's investigations into Burisma had to be treated with "white gloves" then turning around a few months later and telling people that Shokin "may" be corrupt and was not investigating Burisma correctly.   Classic . . .   :lol: :lol:

https://ibb.co/LZvMs9V

But don't investigate . . . Russian Propaganda!!  :lol: :lol:
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: SkinnyBenny on November 24, 2019, 03:18:20 PM
Dax, have you ever deleted posts?
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: sonofdaxjones on November 24, 2019, 03:30:04 PM
Dax, have you ever deleted posts?

Yes, about 10 minutes ago when I realized I posted something in the wrong thread.

Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: Cire on November 24, 2019, 04:07:47 PM
Nunez, Graham, Jordan et al know that they took a eff load of dirty Russian money through the NRA/Giulianis best buds.

What’s daxs excuse?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: DaBigTrain on November 24, 2019, 04:48:23 PM
Dax, have you ever deleted posts?

Yes, about 10 minutes ago when I realized I posted something in the wrong thread.

Confusion symptoms are getting worse :frown:
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: waks on November 25, 2019, 11:37:13 AM
Nunez, Graham, Jordan et al know that they took a eff load of dirty Russian money through the NRA/Giulianis best buds.

What’s daxs excuse?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
What does it say about the Republican party to know that Russians really want them in power? Wouldn't they prefer President Stand Down's party and several more decades of the Great Bend Over? Dax?
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: sonofdaxjones on November 25, 2019, 11:43:25 AM
 :lol:  dirty money.

I'll take on-line foreign campaign contributions for $1000 Alex.

The CF, over $300 million in "contributions" right before and during 2016.  CF contributions in 2018 -$16 million (that's negative 16 million).

Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: DaBigTrain on November 25, 2019, 11:46:33 AM
 :eek: please elaborate on this thing with the Clinton's Dax, I've never heard about this before.
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: chum1 on November 25, 2019, 05:18:45 PM
https://twitter.com/NPR/status/1199099811431174144
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: Phil Titola on November 27, 2019, 10:24:30 AM
So the government offices were told to hold the funds the same day as the call and trump releases the funds as soon as he hears there is a whistleblower.

These guys are not good at this
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: Spracne on November 27, 2019, 10:32:38 AM
This impeachment business appears to be becoming a lead zeppelin.
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: Phil Titola on November 27, 2019, 11:46:43 AM
These guys do everything in their power to appear guilty and corrupt. Quite spectacular
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: sys on November 27, 2019, 04:10:35 PM
he may be a complete criminal maga, but i like this sondland dude.  he's a star.

i guess i need to be on the lookout for a new favorite maga.  disappointing, but not really surprising.

https://twitter.com/jmartNYT/status/1199805476134887428
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: wetwillie on November 27, 2019, 05:33:26 PM
Sys what is the timeline for the house intelligence committee to formally turn this over to the House Judiciary Committee to vote on whether to draft articles of impeachment?
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: sys on November 27, 2019, 06:25:25 PM
no idea.
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: chum1 on November 27, 2019, 06:30:06 PM
They can (and should) drag it out as long as they want.
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: Spracne on November 27, 2019, 06:34:35 PM
Dems misfired, I'm afraid. Look at the receding support from Independents.
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: wetwillie on November 27, 2019, 07:10:06 PM
They can (and should) drag it out as long as they want.



Meh I think they will go another month or so.  Clinton’s went from inquiry launch to impeached in a little under 3 months.
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: Rage Against the McKee on November 29, 2019, 06:52:54 PM
Dems misfired, I'm afraid. Look at the receding support from Independents.

I expect support to increase when he actually gets impeached.
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: Spracne on November 29, 2019, 07:50:01 PM
Dems misfired, I'm afraid. Look at the receding support from Independents.

I expect support to increase when he actually gets impeached.
Disagree
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: DaBigTrain on November 29, 2019, 08:51:26 PM
Coming from a closet Trumper idk if I agree with Spracs
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: waks on November 30, 2019, 04:58:53 AM
Have his numbers improved? Please share all polls in this thread.
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: sys on November 30, 2019, 02:45:56 PM
Have his numbers improved? Please share all polls in this thread.

support for impeachment went up a bit and also trump's approval numbers ticked up a very tiny bit.  macro-level, nothing has changed.
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: steve dave on December 02, 2019, 07:23:57 PM
Holy crap


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: gatoveintisiete on December 02, 2019, 07:33:27 PM
I like turnbull, I would love to get his take in about 2-3 months.
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: turnbull on December 02, 2019, 07:38:22 PM
Here is exactly what is going to happen....He'll get impeached by probably straight partisan line, the Senate trial they'll do an investigation of the Biden's much like they did during the 5-7 investigations into Benghazi. They'll acquit him probably on straight party lines (might have a defector on either side at most two)
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: gatoveintisiete on December 02, 2019, 07:57:06 PM
I know that, I'm talking about all the conspiracy theories getting dunked on.  Barr and 'nems
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: gatoveintisiete on December 02, 2019, 08:01:36 PM
and yes nate silver and 538 are top shelf like turnbull says
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: Institutional Control on December 02, 2019, 08:55:47 PM
I like turnbull, I would love to get his take in about 2-3 months.
Most likely just another of your socks.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: DaBigTrain on December 02, 2019, 08:58:20 PM
turnbull is taking this very well IMO.
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: MakeItRain on December 03, 2019, 02:22:38 AM
Your assessment about not moving the national average for impeachment is correct. The framing of the impeachment being done by a particular news channel is very dishonest and downright a middle finger to everyone. So in essence even if Trump came out and said this exact line "F*ck yea I did it...and I did it to hurt Biden/protect Russia because I owed them for helping me get elected with a mandate to destroy the US from within", you'd have this news channel declaring so what that he did it....not impeachable and he's truly a patriot for defeating Hillary Clinton which could have destroyed the US. This is actually kinda where we are now essentially where we are now with several members of the GOP saying it was inappropriate but not impeachment worthy, though oddly enough Bill Clinton was impeached over a BJ and denying it under oath. We've reached the point where their members will straight up lie to people's faces and get away with it because they dont respect them and know for a fact they'll believe whatever tinfoil hat project Hannity or Carlson present at the night (south african farmers, mueller was connected to the mob, "i'm rooting for russia", Ukraine really hacked the 2016 election (despite all 17 Intel Agencies saying they didnt, and clearly stating that the Ukraine blame is coming directly from Russia), Hillary Clinton murdered Seth Rich, Tan Suit Gate, Dinnergate in NYC for Obama, Obama went Golfing, or a good one "white house job gate in 2010", Obama took 34% of the US Navy on a trip to India, etc. However, there is a really good site that tracks a lot of numbers and polls from various sources. It weights polls based on results, survey methods, and sample sizes.
This good website to monitor polls is https://fivethirtyeight.com/
They also have good projections on other stuff such as sports teams, who will win the elections, projections, presidential approval ratings.

Have his numbers improved? Please share all polls in this thread.

support for impeachment went up a bit and also trump's approval numbers ticked up a very tiny bit.  macro-level, nothing has changed.

Come on man
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: star seed 7 on December 03, 2019, 03:19:30 PM
Quote
i think he's a maniac. i think adam schiff is a deranged human being. i think he grew up with a complex for lots of reasons that are obvious. i think he's a very sick man, and he lies. adam schiff made up my conversation with the president of ukraine. and one of the reasons people keep talking about it is because that's what they saw. we have a perfectly beautiful 3-4 page transcription, then in the other case a 2 page transcription of the conversation. but a lot of people didn't read that. how many people call you? a friend of mine called up, a top person in new york called up, great friend of mine, very successful: 'gee, i didn't like what was said,' i said, oh where did you see it, did you read it? 'no i didn't read it, i heard adam schiff give it." i said, well that's not what was said. and i sent him a copy of what was said, and he said 'this is like, this is great, this isn't what he said.' this guy is sick! he made up the conversation, he lied. if he didn't do that in the halls of congress, he'd be thrown in a jail. but he did it in the halls of congress, and he's given immunity. this is a sick person; he's a liar. and by the way, nancy pelosi knew he was lying, and she went on her show, stephanapolous, and she said he told the truth, so she was lying too. these people are deranged.
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: Brock Landers on December 03, 2019, 03:27:41 PM
Very Presidential indeed.
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: chum1 on December 04, 2019, 08:47:45 AM
 :Woot:

Quote
There could be disruptions from Rep. Matt Gaetz (R-Fla.), the Fox News favorite who led a conservative revolt against impeachment in mid-October by storming the secure room where depositions were taking place.

There could be conspiracy theories from Rep. Louie Gohmert (R-Tex.), who nearly named the intelligence community whistleblower during a recent speech on the House floor.

And there could be antics from Rep. Steve Cohen (D-Tenn.), a vocal Trump critic who brought a bucket of fried chicken to a hearing in May to highlight the absence of Attorney General William P. Barr, who was scheduled to testify.
...
“It’s a bunch of brawlers sometimes on the Judiciary Committee, so it should get pretty hot under the collar as we go along,” said Rep. Andy Biggs (R-Ariz.), a member of the panel, during an interview on Fox News’s “Sunday Morning Futures.”

“I don’t think things have been done the way they’ve been done in the past .?.?. so it causes some rancor and it should be much more feisty, I would say, than the Intel Committee was,” he said.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/bunch-of-brawlers-judiciary-panels-most-aggressive-members-ready-to-rumble-in-impeachment-probe/2019/12/03/a3750326-15da-11ea-9110-3b34ce1d92b1_story.html
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: Cire on December 04, 2019, 09:14:25 AM
LOL,

This is behind closed doors or open?

Gaetz is going to be a complete shlt show during this thing.
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: chum1 on December 04, 2019, 09:16:30 AM
The broadcast just started!
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: sonofdaxjones on December 04, 2019, 09:41:27 AM
Little Jerry Nadler told Dems yesterday he ain't taken any crap, so I'm sure that news has got LibBot Nation all jizzed up.

Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: gatoveintisiete on December 04, 2019, 09:48:50 AM
uh Professor Feldman can we tone it down a notch   :lol:
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: Cire on December 04, 2019, 12:32:15 PM
Little Jerry Nadler told Dems yesterday he ain't taken any crap, so I'm sure that news has got LibBot Nation all jizzed up.

Hadn't heard this
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: chum1 on December 04, 2019, 12:47:08 PM
Pretty tame so far.
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: turnbull on December 04, 2019, 01:02:04 PM
Not a bad showing by the 4 people on the panel. It'll be interesting more because I do believe at this point the cards are on the table either way.  However,  Guiliani interviewing the Ukrainians again today as reported by the NY Times isn't helpful for anyone.
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: sonofdaxjones on December 04, 2019, 01:07:50 PM
Some wonderful opinions being expressed today.   It's great that we have a system that allows policy wonks to get up on TV and tell us what their opinions are . . . fantastic.

Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: Phil Titola on December 04, 2019, 01:48:43 PM
Yeah why not just listen to the president and be done with this whole thing.
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: sonofdaxjones on December 04, 2019, 01:53:36 PM
Yeah why not just listen to the president and be done with this whole thing.

You guys listen to a dude who admitted by his very  :lol: report that he's basically spying on people.

Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: chum1 on December 04, 2019, 02:12:06 PM
Quote
There could be conspiracy theories from Rep. Louie Gohmert (R-Tex.)

OMG LOL. Trump/dax brain going on there.
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: LickNeckey on December 04, 2019, 02:19:46 PM
Even the fox guys think Turley got it wrong...

In his opening statement and throughout his early testimony, Turley—a George Washington University law professor—pointed the finger at House Democrats and attempted to turn the tables on their allegations President Donald Trump abused his power and obstructed justice.

“Then you have an obstruction case, because a court issues an order, and unless they stay that order by a higher court, you have obstruction,” Turley declared. “But I can’t emphasize this enough and I’ll say it just one more time, if you impeach a president, if you make a high crime and misdemeanor out of going to the courts, it is an abuse of power. It’s your abuse of power. You’re doing precisely what you’re criticizing the president for doing.”

Fox News senior judicial analyst Judge Andrew Napolitano, who has repeatedly insisted that Trump committed impeachable offenses, pushed back on Turley’s analysis.

“Where I disagree with my dear friend—I’ve worked with him and testified alongside him—Jon Turley on the significance of obstruction of justice, he is forgetting that the House has the sole—S-O-L-E—power of impeachment,” Napolitano proclaimed. “It does not need to go to a court for approval.”

“It doesn’t need to go to court to get the subpoenas enforced,” he added. “When the president receives a subpoena, or in this case Mick Mulvaney, Mike Pompeo receive a subpoena, and they throw it in a drawer. They do not comply or challenge because the president told them to; that is the act of obstruction.”

Fox News contributor Andy McCarthy, a former U.S attorney who has been a vocal critic of impeachment, meanwhile, backed up Napolitano’s remarks.

“I happen to agree with the judge,” McCarthy noted. “I do not think that to the extent that Jon Turley is taking the position that you either have to or should go to the court if you are Congress to enforce your subpoenas, I think that is simply wrong.”

“I don’t think the framers would have thought that the Article I branch needed the assistance of the Article III branch to impeach an officer of the Article II branch,” the National Review columnist continued. “I just don’t think that it’s conceivable.”
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: Phil Titola on December 04, 2019, 02:28:23 PM
Yeah why not just listen to the president and be done with this whole thing.

You guys listen to a dude who admitted by his very  :lol: report that he's basically spying on people.

Trump admits he did it, you just think it's okay. Great bendover indeed
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: sonofdaxjones on December 04, 2019, 02:52:22 PM
Yeah why not just listen to the president and be done with this whole thing.

You guys listen to a dude who admitted by his very  :lol: report that he's basically spying on people.

Trump admits he did it, you just think it's okay. Great bendover indeed

No surprise to anyone that Phil is a couple of laps down.

Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: sonofdaxjones on December 04, 2019, 03:03:13 PM
I thought Turley was pretty great.

But I've admired Turley ever since he get the the DOD/USAF to admit that Area 51 did indeed exist.

His mad riff was classic and pretty much spot on.   But even Captain Obvious understands the 1000 plus days of Trump  :curse: rage.


Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: chum1 on December 04, 2019, 03:04:15 PM
Area 51

 :love:
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: star seed 7 on December 04, 2019, 03:05:51 PM
Area 51

 :love:

 :lol:
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: DaBigTrain on December 04, 2019, 03:13:11 PM
:lol: oh dax
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: sonofdaxjones on December 04, 2019, 03:40:06 PM
Turley was involved in suing the USAF/DOD on behalf of some Area 51 workers who got cancer from open burning of toxic waste.

FFS weirdos.

Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: Dugout DickStone on December 04, 2019, 04:09:12 PM
Lol Turley doesn’t understand the Constitution

And believes in ufos

Peak maga
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: sonofdaxjones on December 04, 2019, 04:34:10 PM
Wow, just awful Slow Dug.

Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: star seed 7 on December 04, 2019, 04:53:36 PM
https://twitter.com/atrupar/status/1202302562927566849
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: sonofdaxjones on December 04, 2019, 05:07:26 PM
I thought Turley was pretty great.

You found his arguments to be convincing, or enjoyed his contrarian position?

I enjoyed his opinions, all of the panel offering their opinions and personal views on this matter were very enjoyable to listen to, in fact the many "witnesses" offering their personal viewpoints, feelings, and opinions on what transpired or what they personally believed transpired were  quite enjoyable.

Most enjoyable of all were Little Jerry Nadler and Adam "spies on Congress" Schiff.






Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: gatoveintisiete on December 04, 2019, 07:37:32 PM
boy who is this Matt Gaetz guy?  Sure seems stud like......
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: bucket on December 04, 2019, 07:39:08 PM
boy who is this Matt Gaetz guy?  Sure seems stud like......

Ya, let's impeach Obama!  :lol:
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: gatoveintisiete on December 04, 2019, 08:08:59 PM
It's a little late for that bucket, and you need like a high crime or misdemeanor my dude
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: bucket on December 04, 2019, 08:14:25 PM
Too bad nobody told Gaetz that today.
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: gatoveintisiete on December 04, 2019, 08:18:24 PM
Well I am not as informed as him I'm sure so I will keep an eye on this for developments.
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: Spracne on December 04, 2019, 09:48:04 PM
Am I the only one who never hears actual people out in the wild discussing impeachment? Seems like I've been overserved this particular tonic for months, and yet I never hear folks out in the world discussing it. The majority of Americans (who are too busy working jobs that don't involve being on the internet all day) are like (a) of course he did that, and (b) my conscience is not shocked, because (c) he does selfish crap all the time and still got elected.

The Senate will not remove. That said, I think it would be best for the House to impeach, just for precedential value.

It's dumb that all of this hearing crap happens during the day during the work week. If they really wanted to change minds, they'd do it uncut in primetime or on the weekends. The way it is now, most folks just tune into their drug of choice in the evening and get the special blend they crave.
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: DaBigTrain on December 04, 2019, 09:52:43 PM
Do you think he should be impeached?
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: Spracne on December 04, 2019, 09:55:24 PM
Do you think he should be impeached?
I believe I answered your question in the post immediately preceding yours.
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: DaBigTrain on December 04, 2019, 09:57:50 PM
Do you think he should be impeached?
I believe I answered your question in the post immediately preceding yours.

Well it was kind of a rhetorical question for you, so yeah you did answer it. Thanks.
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: Spracne on December 04, 2019, 10:00:34 PM
Compelling stuff. Thanks.
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: bucket on December 04, 2019, 10:01:36 PM
Am I the only one who never hears actual people out in the wild discussing impeachment? Seems like I've been overserved this particular tonic for months, and yet I never hear folks out in the world discussing it. The majority of Americans (who are too busy working jobs that don't involve being on the internet all day) are like (a) of course he did that, and (b) my conscience is not shocked, because (c) he does selfish crap all the time and still got elected.

The Senate will not remove. That said, I think it would be best for the House to impeach, just for precedential value.

It's dumb that all of this hearing crap happens during the day during the work week. If they really wanted to change minds, they'd do it uncut in primetime or on the weekends. The way it is now, most folks just tune into their drug of choice in the evening and get the special blend they crave.

Politics is one of the last things I want to have a conversation about. Maybe other people feel the same way  :dunno:
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: DaBigTrain on December 04, 2019, 10:05:22 PM
Am I the only one who never hears actual people out in the wild discussing impeachment? Seems like I've been overserved this particular tonic for months, and yet I never hear folks out in the world discussing it. The majority of Americans (who are too busy working jobs that don't involve being on the internet all day) are like (a) of course he did that, and (b) my conscience is not shocked, because (c) he does selfish crap all the time and still got elected.

The Senate will not remove. That said, I think it would be best for the House to impeach, just for precedential value.

It's dumb that all of this hearing crap happens during the day during the work week. If they really wanted to change minds, they'd do it uncut in primetime or on the weekends. The way it is now, most folks just tune into their drug of choice in the evening and get the special blend they crave.

Politics is one of the last things I want to have a conversation about. Maybe other people feel the same way  :dunno:

Nope. Everyone wants to talk to their coworkers during the workday about dividing politics that can only lead to a civil discussion.
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: Spracne on December 04, 2019, 10:14:05 PM
Fair point re: coworkers, but my observation is not limited to the workplace. Also, I began with a question, inviting responses from others regarding their personal non-line experiences. It doesn't come up in conversations with friends, I haven't overheard anything in any of the hipster coffee shops I frequent, and I've received no chain emails from relatives regarding same.
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: bucket on December 04, 2019, 10:19:17 PM
Fair point re: coworkers, but my observation is not limited to the workplace. Also, I began with a question, inviting responses from others regarding their personal non-line experiences. It doesn't come up in conversations with friends, I haven't overheard anything in any of the hipster coffee shops I frequent, and I've received no chain emails from relatives regarding same.

I really don't want to discuss politics with friends, either. I prefer less serious conversation.
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: Phil Titola on December 04, 2019, 10:24:58 PM
I feel like most people feel politics today (especially trump) is more decisive than ever and really try and avoid the topic more than ever.  Any haha comment about some dumb thing Trump said is quickly dismissed as "yeah yeah he is dumb let's move on before a trump person (or overly anti-trump) overhears and goes nuts and runs the evening"
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: bucket on December 04, 2019, 10:28:26 PM
I'd rather talk about the cats or your week than the pro's and con's of medicare for all. Even after a productive conversation regarding politics it still feels like a waste of time and isn't fun.
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: DaBigTrain on December 04, 2019, 10:30:56 PM
I feel like most people feel politics today (especially trump) is more decisive than ever and really try and avoid the topic more than ever.  Any haha comment about some dumb thing Trump said is quickly dismissed as "yeah yeah he is dumb let's move on before a trump person (or overly anti-trump) overhears and goes nuts and runs the evening"

I have family members that openly express concern over Trump stuff and bitch and moan about it. I just ignore them. It's amazing how if someone makes a comment complaining about unfairly Trump or whatever is portrayed, and you just immediately change the subject they back off.
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: DaBigTrain on December 04, 2019, 10:33:00 PM
I'd rather talk about the cats or your week than the pro's and con's of medicare for all. Even after a productive conversation regarding politics it still feels like a waste of time and isn't fun.

Yeah well you are damaging the viewpoint of a closet Trumper so Obama and Hillary emails and such so Bengazi*, personal email server, random bombing, general :curse:
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: gatoveintisiete on December 04, 2019, 11:13:20 PM
one explanation for what spracne is experiencing is that most people are Trumpers but stay pretty quiet about it unless they know you because nobody wants a crazy lib flying off the handle and making a scene over some politic talk. spracne you are a lawyer I think?  Me and the other Trumpers wouldn't talk Trump with you because most lawyers are libs so not knowing your personal politics we wouldn't bring it up. 
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: gatoveintisiete on December 04, 2019, 11:15:15 PM
lib7 probably doesn't talk pot with squares or people he doesn't know about either.
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: star seed 7 on December 05, 2019, 05:55:43 AM
I have one friend that I see often and we usually discuss trump's shenanigans of the week. It just always ends with both of us shaking our head and saying that it's nuts that people vote for him.

There is one trump voter friend of a friend, but the only time politics comes up is when he says something racist or homophobic and I'll say "whoa, trump voter alert" and then he gets embarrassed. I don't think he's going to vote for trump again.

Other than that, I'd rather not know, maga people fly off the handle and get really defensive if you don't worship him so I'd rather not deal with that. It's a total cult.
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: star seed 7 on December 05, 2019, 06:50:35 AM
The exception, obviously, is if I knew anyone like daxbot then I would pretty much only talk about politics and just keep him rolling. Maybe "accidentally" mention Hillary when he needs an energy boost.
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: chum1 on December 05, 2019, 08:57:19 AM
 :lol:

https://twitter.com/GarrettHaake/status/1202350942349406208
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: chum1 on December 05, 2019, 12:11:27 PM
I didn't understand what Rudy was doing in Ukraine this time, so I read about it.  :lol:

Quote
on a mission to “destroy” the Democrats’ impeachment narrative
...
he met Tuesday with Yuriy Lutsenko, a discredited former Ukrainian prosecutor general who has emerged as a key figure in the impeachment inquiry. Giuliani is filming the three-part program, Ukrainian Witnesses Destroy Schiff’s Case for OAN, hosted by Chanel Rion, inside a series of “undisclosed safe houses” for no discernible reason.
...
He is expected to meet with Viktor Shokin and Kostiantyn Kulyk, two other former Ukrainian prosecutors who were fired for poor performance and alleged corruption.

Shokin, Kulyk, and Lutsenko have helped Giuliani push a bogus conspiracy theory that Ukraine — not Russia — interfered in the 2016 election and have spread unfounded corruption accusations against former vice president Joe Biden and his son
...
He declined to say where Giuliani was staying and didn’t want to disclose their plans. Instead, Telizhenko wanted to talk about how “Soros people”— a common refrain from conspiracy theorists — at the US Embassy in Kyiv are trying to “block” his return to Washington

https://twitter.com/ChristopherJM/status/1202618706943197187
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: Dugout DickStone on December 05, 2019, 01:02:04 PM
 How long until Dax adopts the Ukraine interfered made up theory?
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: waks on December 05, 2019, 01:02:35 PM
Thought he already had.
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: Institutional Control on December 05, 2019, 01:17:56 PM
How long until Dax adopts the Ukraine interfered made up theory?

He's been all-in on that for a while.

so obvs slow to the party on this one (my assumption that Dax was just being a racist got me here)

ppl are angry at this Chalupa lady for trying to prove that Trump was working with the Russians?

is that it?

Because you're utterly unaware of who the operatives are in this situation, makes me a racist?   It's not my fault you're an idiot.

i said i assumed you were a racist (while that may or may not be true i was clearly mistaken concerning the Chalupa thing)


is this part accurate

ppl are angry at this Chalupa lady for trying to prove that Trump was working with the Russians?

obviously i haven't read the epoch times enough lateley

No one is mad, they're  :lol: because she's lying about her work for the Dems, or at least telling a series of half-truths.   

In addition, it's always  :lol: when everything that's Anti-Trump that comes out of a Ukrainian or Russian is absolute fact, but anything that sounds bad for the LibBots from sources in the same countries is all lies.

Of course, while all the fingers are pointing at Trump and the Ukraine, there's a reason why the then sitting government of the Ukraine tried the instant mea culpa route with Trump after he won, because they were trying to get Hillary elected.

so is the Chalupa lady central to the Ukrainian counter interference narrative?

Interference of what?  Ukraine is central to multiple so called "interference" narratives.
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: LickNeckey on December 05, 2019, 01:36:18 PM
just because you sheeple believe every intelligence agency over Q that won't stop Dax from speaking his truth


 :ROFL:
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: Dugout DickStone on December 05, 2019, 01:55:31 PM
How long until Dax adopts the Ukraine interfered made up theory?

Lol no.  Even he knows that’s just for the true morons
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: sonofdaxjones on December 05, 2019, 01:57:41 PM
 :lol: :lol:

Why don't LibDerps never want to understand why the previous Ukrainian regime tried to kiss and make-up almost immediately after Trump got elected?

Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: Dugout DickStone on December 05, 2019, 01:58:44 PM
:lol: :lol:

Why don't LibDerps never want to understand why the previous Ukrainian regime tried to kiss and make-up almost immediately after Trump got elected?

Wait you really are?  That’s rough ridin' awesomely looney
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: sonofdaxjones on December 05, 2019, 02:52:53 PM
:lol: :lol:

Why don't LibDerps never want to understand why the previous Ukrainian regime tried to kiss and make-up almost immediately after Trump got elected?

Wait you really are?  That’s rough ridin' awesomely looney

What is a fact, looney? 

Slow Dug, just as admit (that as usual) you didn't even know this.   :lol:

Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: LickNeckey on December 05, 2019, 03:37:31 PM
:lol: :lol:

Why don't LibDerps never want to understand why the previous Ukrainian regime tried to kiss and make-up almost immediately after Trump got elected?

well they are at war with Russia and in need of US military support to not be overran

the new president was the choice of Moscow who received the support of a considerable influence campaign from the Kremlin

maybe, just maybe (hear me out) they were nervous that the new President may show preferrence to Moscow over Kiev
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: Dugout DickStone on December 05, 2019, 03:43:39 PM
He’s trolling you dorks.  No one is dumb enough to switch to this just recently manufactured fake conspiracy
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: Institutional Control on December 05, 2019, 03:46:21 PM
:lol: :lol:

Why don't LibDerps never want to understand why the previous Ukrainian regime tried to kiss and make-up almost immediately after Trump got elected?

well they are at war with Russia and in need of US military support to not be overran

the new president was the choice of Moscow who received the support of a considerable influence campaign from the Kremlin

maybe, just maybe (hear me out) they were nervous that the new President may show preferrence to Moscow over Kiev

(https://media1.tenor.com/images/344db5f69346dd62c52aaf716280d15f/tenor.gif)
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: Dugout DickStone on December 05, 2019, 03:47:06 PM
:lol: :lol:

Why don't LibDerps never want to understand why the previous Ukrainian regime tried to kiss and make-up almost immediately after Trump got elected?

Wait you really are?  That’s rough ridin' awesomely looney

What is a fact, looney? 

Slow Dug, just as admit (that as usual) you didn't even know this.   :lol:

Uhh.  I didn’t say anything is a fact.  Your trifocals are smudged
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: sonofdaxjones on December 05, 2019, 03:52:51 PM
He’s trolling you dorks.  No one is dumb enough to switch to this just recently manufactured fake conspiracy

When are you going to admit that you're absolutely clueless?

Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: sonofdaxjones on December 05, 2019, 03:59:39 PM
:lol: :lol:

Why don't LibDerps never want to understand why the previous Ukrainian regime tried to kiss and make-up almost immediately after Trump got elected?

well they are at war with Russia and in need of US military support to not be overran

the new president was the choice of Moscow who received the support of a considerable influence campaign from the Kremlin

maybe, just maybe (hear me out) they were nervous that the new President may show preferrence to Moscow over Kiev

 . . .and maybe (well not maybe) they knew that Trump knew that they were working with the Clinton Campaign.

https://www.politico.com/story/2017/01/ukraine-sabotage-trump-backfire-233446   (this isn't election interference pearl clutchers) 

Or are you talking about Zelinksky, if so  :lol:  (Why are you always so far behind the curve?)



Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: Dugout DickStone on December 05, 2019, 04:00:40 PM
He’s trolling you dorks.  No one is dumb enough to switch to this just recently manufactured fake conspiracy

When are you going to admit that you're absolutely clueless?

Tapout DECLINED.

Put up a fight at least. 
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: sonofdaxjones on December 05, 2019, 04:02:29 PM
He’s trolling you dorks.  No one is dumb enough to switch to this just recently manufactured fake conspiracy

When are you going to admit that you're absolutely clueless?

Tapout DECLINED.

Put up a fight at least.

SMDH, it's sad to see you like this Slow Dug.

Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: Phil Titola on December 05, 2019, 04:12:28 PM
POTUS did.
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: sonofdaxjones on December 05, 2019, 05:58:59 PM
Adam "spies on Congress" Schiff.

Reason: Devin Nunes Supports Secret Surveillance of Americans, Finds Himself Under Surveillance.
https://reason.com/2019/12/05/devin-nunes-secret-surveillance/

Apparently we can put Schiff down as being in full support of spying on American citizens as well.



Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: Shooter Jones on December 05, 2019, 06:26:16 PM
I enjoyed when Swalwell crap himself on air, other than that, this has all been very boring.
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: LickNeckey on December 05, 2019, 08:18:34 PM
:lol: :lol:

Why don't LibDerps never want to understand why the previous Ukrainian regime tried to kiss and make-up almost immediately after Trump got elected?

well they are at war with Russia and in need of US military support to not be overran

the new president was the choice of Moscow who received the support of a considerable influence campaign from the Kremlin

maybe, just maybe (hear me out) they were nervous that the new President may show preferrence to Moscow over Kiev

 . . .and maybe (well not maybe) they knew that Trump knew that they were working with the Clinton Campaign.

https://www.politico.com/story/2017/01/ukraine-sabotage-trump-backfire-233446   (this isn't election interference pearl clutchers) 

Or are you talking about Zelinksky, if so  :lol:  (Why are you always so far behind the curve?)

directly from the article you link

Russia’s effort was personally directed by Russian President Vladimir Putin, involved the country’s military and foreign intelligence services, according to U.S. intelligence officials. They reportedly briefed Trump last week on the possibility that Russian operatives might have compromising information on the president-elect. And at a Senate hearing last week on the hacking, Director of National Intelligence James Clapper said “I don't think we've ever encountered a more aggressive or direct campaign to interfere in our election process than we've seen in this case.”

There’s little evidence of such a top-down effort by Ukraine. Longtime observers suggest that the rampant corruption, factionalism and economic struggles plaguing the country — not to mention its ongoing strife with Russia — would render it unable to pull off an ambitious covert interference campaign in another country’s election. And President Petro Poroshenko’s administration, along with the Ukrainian Embassy in Washington, insists that Ukraine stayed neutral in the race.
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: steve dave on December 05, 2019, 10:49:50 PM
lmao


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: sonofdaxjones on December 06, 2019, 10:17:04 AM
:lol: :lol:

Why don't LibDerps never want to understand why the previous Ukrainian regime tried to kiss and make-up almost immediately after Trump got elected?

well they are at war with Russia and in need of US military support to not be overran

the new president was the choice of Moscow who received the support of a considerable influence campaign from the Kremlin

maybe, just maybe (hear me out) they were nervous that the new President may show preferrence to Moscow over Kiev

 . . .and maybe (well not maybe) they knew that Trump knew that they were working with the Clinton Campaign.

https://www.politico.com/story/2017/01/ukraine-sabotage-trump-backfire-233446   (this isn't election interference pearl clutchers) 

Or are you talking about Zelinksky, if so  :lol:  (Why are you always so far behind the curve?)

directly from the article you link

Russia’s effort was personally directed by Russian President Vladimir Putin, involved the country’s military and foreign intelligence services, according to U.S. intelligence officials. They reportedly briefed Trump last week on the possibility that Russian operatives might have compromising information on the president-elect. And at a Senate hearing last week on the hacking, Director of National Intelligence James Clapper said “I don't think we've ever encountered a more aggressive or direct campaign to interfere in our election process than we've seen in this case.”  Lick You are the master of the obvious and what is already well known.  Your guy, Barack Obama, aka President Stand Down was well aware of Russia's efforts and told his cyber security directory to . . . stand down

There’s little evidence of such a top-down effort by Ukraine. Longtime observers suggest that the rampant corruption, factionalism and economic struggles plaguing the country — not to mention its ongoing strife with Russia — would render it unable to pull off an ambitious covert interference campaign in another country’s election. And President Petro Poroshenko’s administration, along with the Ukrainian Embassy in Washington, insists that Ukraine stayed neutral in the race.   Here we go with the unilateral proclamations from Lick  :jerk: :jerk: Yet we know that for example I'll Take Two Chalupa's is lying straight out of her ass in regards to her activities in the Ukraine, and her role in the Ukraine while she was (and still may be) on the DNC payroll, that's just one person.   In no way have I even implied that this was some sort of massive concentrated effort on the part of the Ukrainian governmental apparatus to interfere in the U.S. elections on par with what Russia was doing (and what we do to them).   But I do appreciate all of your Captain Obvious talking points about the state of corruption in Ukraine.   That was hammered home months ago by the Mega Corrupt Democratic Front Runner Joe Biden and I suspect that's just the tip of the iceberg in regards to the things that he and Dem operatives were up to in the Ukraine . . . USAID money cough . . . cough.   The sad thing is, your party now quite clearly extols the virtues of foreign aid without question or expectations of a change in course in this case, corruption, sad
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: Dugout DickStone on December 06, 2019, 10:18:20 AM
impressive self own
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: sonofdaxjones on December 06, 2019, 10:19:40 AM
impressive self own

 :lol:  It's sad that you don't even understand what we're talking about, Slow Dug
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: LickNeckey on December 06, 2019, 10:33:51 AM
:lol: :lol:

Why don't LibDerps never want to understand why the previous Ukrainian regime tried to kiss and make-up almost immediately after Trump got elected?

well they are at war with Russia and in need of US military support to not be overran

the new president was the choice of Moscow who received the support of a considerable influence campaign from the Kremlin

maybe, just maybe (hear me out) they were nervous that the new President may show preferrence to Moscow over Kiev

 . . .and maybe (well not maybe) they knew that Trump knew that they were working with the Clinton Campaign.

https://www.politico.com/story/2017/01/ukraine-sabotage-trump-backfire-233446   (this isn't election interference pearl clutchers) 

Or are you talking about Zelinksky, if so  :lol:  (Why are you always so far behind the curve?)

directly from the article you link

Russia’s effort was personally directed by Russian President Vladimir Putin, involved the country’s military and foreign intelligence services, according to U.S. intelligence officials. They reportedly briefed Trump last week on the possibility that Russian operatives might have compromising information on the president-elect. And at a Senate hearing last week on the hacking, Director of National Intelligence James Clapper said “I don't think we've ever encountered a more aggressive or direct campaign to interfere in our election process than we've seen in this case.”  Lick You are the master of the obvious and what is already well known.  Your guy, Barack Obama, aka President Stand Down was well aware of Russia's efforts and told his cyber security directory to . . . stand down

There’s little evidence of such a top-down effort by Ukraine. Longtime observers suggest that the rampant corruption, factionalism and economic struggles plaguing the country — not to mention its ongoing strife with Russia — would render it unable to pull off an ambitious covert interference campaign in another country’s election. And President Petro Poroshenko’s administration, along with the Ukrainian Embassy in Washington, insists that Ukraine stayed neutral in the race.   Here we go with the unilateral proclamations from Lick  :jerk: :jerk: Yet we know that for example I'll Take Two Chalupa's is lying straight out of her ass in regards to her activities in the Ukraine, and her role in the Ukraine while she was (and still may be) on the DNC payroll, that's just one person.   In no way have I even implied that this was some sort of massive concentrated effort on the part of the Ukrainian governmental apparatus to interfere in the U.S. elections on par with what Russia was doing (and what we do to them).   But I do appreciate all of your Captain Obvious talking points about the state of corruption in Ukraine.   That was hammered home months ago by the Mega Corrupt Democratic Front Runner Joe Biden and I suspect that's just the tip of the iceberg in regards to the things that he and Dem operatives were up to in the Ukraine . . . USAID money cough . . . cough.   The sad thing is, your party now quite clearly extols the virtues of foreign aid without question or expectations of a change in course in this case, corruption, sad

dude again i straight copied and pasted this out of your article if you read it
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: Dugout DickStone on December 06, 2019, 10:34:40 AM
sonofselfowns
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: sonofdaxjones on December 06, 2019, 10:37:00 AM
:lol: :lol:

Why don't LibDerps never want to understand why the previous Ukrainian regime tried to kiss and make-up almost immediately after Trump got elected?

well they are at war with Russia and in need of US military support to not be overran

the new president was the choice of Moscow who received the support of a considerable influence campaign from the Kremlin

maybe, just maybe (hear me out) they were nervous that the new President may show preferrence to Moscow over Kiev

 . . .and maybe (well not maybe) they knew that Trump knew that they were working with the Clinton Campaign.

https://www.politico.com/story/2017/01/ukraine-sabotage-trump-backfire-233446   (this isn't election interference pearl clutchers) 

Or are you talking about Zelinksky, if so  :lol:  (Why are you always so far behind the curve?)

directly from the article you link

Russia’s effort was personally directed by Russian President Vladimir Putin, involved the country’s military and foreign intelligence services, according to U.S. intelligence officials. They reportedly briefed Trump last week on the possibility that Russian operatives might have compromising information on the president-elect. And at a Senate hearing last week on the hacking, Director of National Intelligence James Clapper said “I don't think we've ever encountered a more aggressive or direct campaign to interfere in our election process than we've seen in this case.”  Lick You are the master of the obvious and what is already well known.  Your guy, Barack Obama, aka President Stand Down was well aware of Russia's efforts and told his cyber security directory to . . . stand down

There’s little evidence of such a top-down effort by Ukraine. Longtime observers suggest that the rampant corruption, factionalism and economic struggles plaguing the country — not to mention its ongoing strife with Russia — would render it unable to pull off an ambitious covert interference campaign in another country’s election. And President Petro Poroshenko’s administration, along with the Ukrainian Embassy in Washington, insists that Ukraine stayed neutral in the race.   Here we go with the unilateral proclamations from Lick  :jerk: :jerk: Yet we know that for example I'll Take Two Chalupa's is lying straight out of her ass in regards to her activities in the Ukraine, and her role in the Ukraine while she was (and still may be) on the DNC payroll, that's just one person.   In no way have I even implied that this was some sort of massive concentrated effort on the part of the Ukrainian governmental apparatus to interfere in the U.S. elections on par with what Russia was doing (and what we do to them).   But I do appreciate all of your Captain Obvious talking points about the state of corruption in Ukraine.   That was hammered home months ago by the Mega Corrupt Democratic Front Runner Joe Biden and I suspect that's just the tip of the iceberg in regards to the things that he and Dem operatives were up to in the Ukraine . . . USAID money cough . . . cough.   The sad thing is, your party now quite clearly extols the virtues of foreign aid without question or expectations of a change in course in this case, corruption, sad

dude again i straight copied and pasted this out of your article if you read it

You're outstanding at pointing out two mutually exclusive things, Lick, great job.

Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: Institutional Control on December 06, 2019, 10:39:53 AM
Lick You are the master of the obvious and what is already well known.  Your guy, Barack Obama, aka President Stand Down was well aware of Russia's efforts and told his cyber security directory to . . . stand down

https://www.npr.org/sections/thetwo-way/2018/01/24/580171396/biden-mcconnell-refused-to-sign-bipartisan-statement-on-russian-interference
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: sonofdaxjones on December 06, 2019, 10:41:03 AM
Lick You are the master of the obvious and what is already well known.  Your guy, Barack Obama, aka President Stand Down was well aware of Russia's efforts and told his cyber security directory to . . . stand down

https://www.npr.org/sections/thetwo-way/2018/01/24/580171396/biden-mcconnell-refused-to-sign-bipartisan-statement-on-russian-interference

I'll take things we already knew for $1000, Alex

What does that have to do with the Ukraine?

Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: waks on December 06, 2019, 10:41:28 AM
What is happening to Dax's brain?  :frown:
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: sonofdaxjones on December 06, 2019, 10:48:32 AM
What is happening to Dax's brain?  :frown:

Why are you weirdo's trying to come at me with things that are already known and completely irrelevant.

 :lol: :lol:  FFS, you guys have melted down for 3 years about Russian interference, your guys own people told him repeatedly and his response to them was to stand down.   You don't need to make any public statements in regards to anything when you're talking cyber-security or operations of that nature.   Does the cyber-security command of the DOD make a public statement every time they do something?   Biden, Obama, McConnell's public statements or lack of public acknowledgement are irrelevant to the stand down order.

Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: SkinnyBenny on December 06, 2019, 10:51:09 AM
Dax when you wake up in the mirning, what are the first websites you go to to get your news? Just curious.
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: sonofdaxjones on December 06, 2019, 10:55:26 AM
Dax when you wake up in the mirning, what are the first websites you go to to get your news? Just curious.

 :lol:
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: Institutional Control on December 06, 2019, 10:58:08 AM
Lick You are the master of the obvious and what is already well known.  Your guy, Barack Obama, aka President Stand Down was well aware of Russia's efforts and told his cyber security directory to . . . stand down

https://www.npr.org/sections/thetwo-way/2018/01/24/580171396/biden-mcconnell-refused-to-sign-bipartisan-statement-on-russian-interference

I'll take things we already knew for $1000, Alex

What does that have to do with the Ukraine?

Wait, so now you're saying there was election interference by Ukraine and President Stand Down knew about it and did nothing about it?
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: sonofdaxjones on December 06, 2019, 11:10:06 AM
Lick You are the master of the obvious and what is already well known.  Your guy, Barack Obama, aka President Stand Down was well aware of Russia's efforts and told his cyber security directory to . . . stand down

https://www.npr.org/sections/thetwo-way/2018/01/24/580171396/biden-mcconnell-refused-to-sign-bipartisan-statement-on-russian-interference






I'll take things we already knew for $1000, Alex

What does that have to do with the Ukraine?

Wait, so now you're saying there was election interference by Ukraine and President Stand Down knew about it and did nothing about it?

OMG.   You're talking about public proclamations after the fact.

 President Stand Down was informed by the director of cybersecurity for these United States (and others) that the Russians were trying to hack/influence etc. etc. the elections, and President Stand Down's response to them was (and Susan Rice's response as well) . . . stand down.

And no . . . in regards to the Ukraine, I'm talking about certain individuals in the Ukraine trying to help the Clinton campaign.

You guys are at least 4 laps down here, as usual.
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: star seed 7 on December 06, 2019, 11:11:12 AM
Old people and technology  :frown:
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: sonofdaxjones on December 06, 2019, 11:12:03 AM
Old people and technology  :frown:

Oh Lib . . . you try so hard  :lol:
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: LickNeckey on December 06, 2019, 11:27:56 AM
What is happening to Dax's brain?  :frown:

Why are you weirdo's trying to come at me with things that are already known and completely irrelevant.

 :lol: :lol:  FFS, you guys have melted down for 3 years about Russian interference, your guys own people told him repeatedly and his response to them was to stand down.   You don't need to make any public statements in regards to anything when you're talking cyber-security or operations of that nature.   Does the cyber-security command of the DOD make a public statement every time they do something?   Biden, Obama, McConnell's public statements or lack of public acknowledgement are irrelevant to the stand down order.

what could Obama have done that you wouldn't have absolutely freaked out about?

Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: sonofdaxjones on December 06, 2019, 11:50:23 AM
What is happening to Dax's brain?  :frown:

Why are you weirdo's trying to come at me with things that are already known and completely irrelevant.

 :lol: :lol:  FFS, you guys have melted down for 3 years about Russian interference, your guys own people told him repeatedly and his response to them was to stand down.   You don't need to make any public statements in regards to anything when you're talking cyber-security or operations of that nature.   Does the cyber-security command of the DOD make a public statement every time they do something?   Biden, Obama, McConnell's public statements or lack of public acknowledgement are irrelevant to the stand down order.

what could Obama have done that you wouldn't have absolutely freaked out about?

 :lol:   Do you think if they actually tried to do something about it they were gonna hold a press conference?



Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: Institutional Control on December 06, 2019, 11:50:47 AM
And no . . . in regards to the Ukraine, I'm talking about certain individuals in the Ukraine trying to help the Clinton campaign.

You guys are at least 4 laps down here, as usual.
It is hard to keep up with your mental gymnastics.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: sonofdaxjones on December 06, 2019, 11:52:17 AM
And no . . . in regards to the Ukraine, I'm talking about certain individuals in the Ukraine trying to help the Clinton campaign.

You guys are at least 4 laps down here, as usual.
It is hard to keep up with your mental gymnastics.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

It's hard dealing with people who don't even know what's going on.

Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: sonofdaxjones on December 06, 2019, 11:53:05 AM
“Civilization as we know it today is at stake in the next election, and certainly, our planet,” said Pelosi.

 :lol: :lol:

Fewer U.S. wars, less U.S. hegemony spells the end of civilization according to Nancy Pelosi
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: catastrophe on December 06, 2019, 12:49:35 PM
I don’t actually know the context but I assume she’s talking about climate change that our President refuses to acknowledge.
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: star seed 7 on December 06, 2019, 01:29:31 PM
I don’t actually know the context but I assume she’s talking about climate change that our President refuses to acknowledge.

Yes, I actually heard this in the car last night and it was a response to a question about climate change and holding companies liable for pollution
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: steve dave on December 06, 2019, 01:36:00 PM
Good spin attempt Dax


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: sonofdaxjones on December 06, 2019, 01:53:14 PM
Bold and dramatic

Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: DaBigTrain on December 07, 2019, 12:08:05 PM
That was an impressive assembly of daxposts.
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: bucket on December 07, 2019, 03:44:22 PM
https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/524960640117780480
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: catastrophe on December 08, 2019, 10:55:18 AM
I have no idea how to process that
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: Katpappy on December 08, 2019, 11:36:29 AM
I think he took the Barron statement literally. :ROFL:
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: 8manpick on December 08, 2019, 12:24:51 PM
It’s from 2014
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: gatoveintisiete on December 08, 2019, 12:33:21 PM
so why would bucket bother posting it
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: bucket on December 08, 2019, 12:37:27 PM
If you open the tweet the image reads at the bottom, "I keep thinking we should include something in the Constitution in case the people elect a rough ridin' moron."
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: DaBigTrain on December 08, 2019, 12:39:19 PM
so why would bucket bother posting it

Because Trump posted it in 2014 saying it about Obama. In this case he’s using it for someone else but he’s too rough ridin' stupid to realize he is just self-owning himself.
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: gatoveintisiete on December 08, 2019, 12:55:56 PM
ok good one
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: steve dave on December 08, 2019, 07:40:51 PM
lmao Nunes


https://twitter.com/lhfang/status/1203813917652398080


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: chum1 on December 08, 2019, 09:07:49 PM
Nunes is one of the most incredible characters in Trumpworld, which is really saying something.
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: waks on December 09, 2019, 04:01:01 AM
Really excited to see him go down.
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: gatoveintisiete on December 09, 2019, 05:28:11 AM
What is Nunes going down for?
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: chum1 on December 09, 2019, 07:01:01 AM
I couldn't tell you exactly what Nixon, Reagan, or W's people went down for (or Trump's so far, for that matter), but I just sort of assume that a hell of a lot of Trump's people will similarly go down.
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: steve dave on December 09, 2019, 07:18:12 AM
Well, shitloads have already gone down so your bet is secure already.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: Phil Titola on December 09, 2019, 09:12:55 AM
He sucks at taking pictures.
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: Dugout DickStone on December 09, 2019, 09:25:03 AM
he has the shakes
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: Institutional Control on December 09, 2019, 10:26:41 AM
https://twitter.com/jiveDurkey/status/1204068431454232580?s=20
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: chum1 on December 09, 2019, 11:56:55 AM
Today is much more of a clown show.
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: Institutional Control on December 09, 2019, 12:21:45 PM
I would not want Castor representing me for a traffic ticket.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: chum1 on December 09, 2019, 12:58:33 PM
Lol Castor keeps insisting on speaking to clarify crap and Collins clearly doesn't think it's a good use of time because he's so bad.
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: Institutional Control on December 09, 2019, 01:04:06 PM
Lol Castor keeps insisting on speaking to clarify crap and Collins clearly doesn't think it's a good use of time because he's so bad.

Castor is so charismatic.  :sdeek:
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: chum1 on December 09, 2019, 01:10:22 PM
The back and forth between Castor and minority counsel is like a much less polished, super awkward version of Fox & Friends.
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: chum1 on December 09, 2019, 01:15:55 PM
The Republicans are 100% just winging this entire thing. HOW IS THAT POSSIBLE!?!?!?
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: Rage Against the McKee on December 09, 2019, 01:27:52 PM
The Republicans are 100% just winging this entire thing. HOW IS THAT POSSIBLE!?!?!?

They are the same people who campaigned for 6 years to repeal and replace Obamacare and then couldn't do it with control of the House, Senate, and Presidency.
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: catastrophe on December 09, 2019, 04:53:24 PM
https://twitter.com/jiveDurkey/status/1204068431454232580?s=20

This is a total power move that I 1000% endorse btw.
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: sonofdaxjones on December 09, 2019, 04:58:30 PM
The Republicans are 100% just winging this entire thing. HOW IS THAT POSSIBLE!?!?!?

They are the same people who campaigned for 6 years to repeal and replace Obamacare and then couldn't do it with control of the House, Senate, and Presidency.

That's because lover of all wars John McCain became a LibBot Nation hero . . . which is fitting of Libbot Nation's love for all armed conflict and demand for even more.



Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: sys on December 09, 2019, 05:16:23 PM
This is a total power move that I 1000% endorse btw.

yeah, that dude's a stud (i realize available evidence indicates he's not very good at his job, but there it is).
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: chum1 on December 09, 2019, 09:34:42 PM
https://twitter.com/rachaelmbade/status/1204218433971347456
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: wetwillie on December 10, 2019, 07:39:57 AM
Looks like my timeline was spot on
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: star seed 7 on December 10, 2019, 01:24:53 PM
This is a total power move that I 1000% endorse btw.

yeah, that dude's a stud (i realize available evidence indicates he's not very good at his job, but there it is).

https://twitter.com/TheFreshMarket/status/1204129992575258625
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: Cire on December 10, 2019, 01:28:41 PM
Ha
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: chum1 on December 11, 2019, 05:56:56 PM
Wow

https://twitter.com/abgutman/status/1204898522363047937
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: bucket on December 11, 2019, 07:20:33 PM
Well, this is going about as well as you'd expect. Representative Ken Buck just said he'd like to punch Robert De Niro in the face.
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: Phil Titola on December 12, 2019, 10:11:26 PM
More like 2.5 branches of government

https://twitter.com/Acyn/status/1205311801212190727
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: sonofdaxjones on December 13, 2019, 07:14:52 AM
It’s sad that LibBot Nation rides with a guy like Jerry Nadler, a guy who just spews the exact same thing he said 20 years ago only changing a couple of words.

Little Jerry has hated Trump for decades.   

Personal vendettas are the hallmark of LibDerpDom.   Sad.  But Useful Idiot LibBot nation will fall in behind anything to support the cause. 
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: Institutional Control on December 13, 2019, 07:45:11 AM
Nadler has hated Trump for decades? Oh, well I can't get behind that.  Everyone knows Trump only recently became a piece of crap.  :sdeek:
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: star seed 7 on December 13, 2019, 07:48:46 AM
Imagine dax being your father or spouse and literally everything negative that happens to him is the result of some imagined personal vendetta. How exhausting
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: sonofdaxjones on December 13, 2019, 07:51:23 AM
Nadler has hated Trump for decades? Oh, well I can't get behind that.  Everyone knows Trump only recently became a piece of crap.  :sdeek:

Like I said in another thread.  Don’t worry, you’ll get somebody in there soon and you can go back to not giving a crap about immigrants, overthrowing defenseless countries, refugee’ing hundreds of thousands of people etc etc all over again.  Just like you did from 2008 to 2016. 
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: chum1 on December 13, 2019, 07:55:32 AM
https://twitter.com/benjaminwittes/status/1205317470820687872
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: Institutional Control on December 13, 2019, 07:57:26 AM
Nadler has hated Trump for decades? Oh, well I can't get behind that.  Everyone knows Trump only recently became a piece of crap.  :sdeek:

Like I said in another thread.  Don’t worry, you’ll get somebody in there soon and you can go back to not giving a crap about immigrants, overthrowing defenseless countries, refugee’ing hundreds of thousands of people etc etc all over again.  Just like you did from 2008 to 2016.

It'll be nice not to have to be concerned about how much of a eff up our president is again.  I miss those days. 
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: sonofdaxjones on December 13, 2019, 08:00:18 AM
Nadler has hated Trump for decades? Oh, well I can't get behind that.  Everyone knows Trump only recently became a piece of crap.  :sdeek:

Like I said in another thread.  Don’t worry, you’ll get somebody in there soon and you can go back to not giving a crap about immigrants, overthrowing defenseless countries, refugee’ing hundreds of thousands of people etc etc all over again.  Just like you did from 2008 to 2016.

It'll be nice not to have to be concerned about how much of a eff up our president is again.  I miss those days.

Like I said, you’ll fall right in line like a good useful idiot and the regime changes, refugee’ing, millions of deportations, appeasement of China etc etc can begin again unfettered. 
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: chum1 on December 13, 2019, 08:00:28 AM
https://twitter.com/kpolantz/status/1205288459558109189
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: ChiComCat on December 13, 2019, 08:10:44 AM
As long as they hold some power in the Legislative branch, they'll just try to strip the office of it's powers before a Democrat takes over
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: catastrophe on December 13, 2019, 08:14:02 AM
Congress has been pretty toothless from the beginning, tbh. Trump is actually doing a great job of exposing problems in our system. Just not sure it’s fixable other than maybe recognizing the electoral college is a joke and allowing the people to actually vote on a president.
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: sonofdaxjones on December 13, 2019, 08:14:04 AM
LibBot Nation:  Concerned about the concentration of power in the executive branch since January 2017
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: sonofdaxjones on December 13, 2019, 08:14:37 AM
Congress has been pretty toothless from the beginning, tbh. Trump is actually doing a great job of exposing problems in our system. Just not sure it’s fixable other than maybe recognizing the electoral college is a joke and allowing the people to actually vote on a president.

Disgraceful
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: catastrophe on December 13, 2019, 08:21:50 AM
Congress has been pretty toothless from the beginning, tbh. Trump is actually doing a great job of exposing problems in our system. Just not sure it’s fixable other than maybe recognizing the electoral college is a joke and allowing the people to actually vote on a president.

Disgraceful

High praise :blush:
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: Shooter Jones on December 13, 2019, 09:52:22 AM
Congress has been pretty toothless from the beginning, tbh. Trump is actually doing a great job of exposing problems in our system. Just not sure it’s fixable other than maybe recognizing the electoral college is a joke and allowing the people to actually vote on a president .

:lol:

One of my faves.
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: star seed 7 on December 13, 2019, 09:53:53 AM
It really is sad that the US still has constitutionally sanctioned voter suppression
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: sonofdaxjones on December 13, 2019, 09:57:04 AM
It really is sad that the US still has constitutionally sanctioned voter suppression

It really is sad to LibBot idiots wanting to completely disenfranchise voters because they live in less populated areas and allow politicians to only pay attention to a select and very small grouping of meccas to urban sprawl.

But here we are.

More surprising that someone that has been utterly marginalized by his own party wants this.



Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: Shooter Jones on December 13, 2019, 10:00:14 AM
On top of the stupid electoral college, I've been pissed for MONTHS that Wyoming gets 2 senators. WHEN DID THEY START DOING THAT?
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: star seed 7 on December 13, 2019, 10:00:59 AM
One person, one vote*

*not valid in presidential elections
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: sonofdaxjones on December 13, 2019, 10:02:30 AM
Power to the Sheeple!! (LibBot Nation)

Derp, lets apply local/regional/state election processes to national elections , . . Derp! (LibBot Nation)

Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: catastrophe on December 13, 2019, 10:03:41 AM
People that praise the electoral college for giving a voice to smaller communities seem completely oblivious to the fact that everyone really only talks about like 5 states each election cycle.
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: chum1 on December 13, 2019, 10:04:29 AM
https://twitter.com/byamberphillips/status/1205511724302061569
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: sonofdaxjones on December 13, 2019, 10:04:49 AM
People that praise the electoral college for giving a voice to smaller communities seem completely oblivious to the fact that everyone really only talks about like 5 states each election cycle.

Oblivious  :lol: :lol: 
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: Shooter Jones on December 13, 2019, 10:09:10 AM
People that praise the electoral college for giving a voice to smaller communities seem completely oblivious to the fact that everyone really only talks about like 5 states each election cycle.


LMAO
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: star seed 7 on December 13, 2019, 10:14:22 AM
Suppressing the vote of millions of Republicans in California to make people pay attention to Ohio, marvelous system.
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: Institutional Control on December 13, 2019, 10:23:38 AM
It really is sad that the US still has constitutionally sanctioned voter suppression

It really is sad to LibBot idiots wanting to completely disenfranchise voters because they live in less populated areas and allow politicians to only pay attention to a select and very small grouping of meccas to urban sprawl.

But here we are.

More surprising that someone that has been utterly marginalized by his own party wants this.

The electoral college disenfranchises voters who live in heavily populated areas.   Why are rural voters disenfranchisement more important to you?  What's the difference?
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: LickNeckey on December 13, 2019, 10:28:14 AM
It really is sad that the US still has constitutionally sanctioned voter suppression

It really is sad to LibBot idiots wanting to completely disenfranchise voters because they live in less populated areas and allow politicians to only pay attention to a select and very small grouping of meccas to urban sprawl.

But here we are.

More surprising that someone that has been utterly marginalized by his own party wants this.

this is such a stupid argument

how is a dem not disenfranchised in a rural area?
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: star seed 7 on December 13, 2019, 10:29:12 AM
Getting rid of the ec doesn't disenfranchise anyone, it creates equal footing for all voters
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: Rage Against the McKee on December 13, 2019, 10:44:24 AM
It really is sad that the US still has constitutionally sanctioned voter suppression

It really is sad to LibBot idiots wanting to completely disenfranchise voters because they live in less populated areas and allow politicians to only pay attention to a select and very small grouping of meccas to urban sprawl.

But here we are.

More surprising that someone that has been utterly marginalized by his own party wants this.

The electoral college disenfranchises voters who live in heavily populated areas.   Why are rural voters disenfranchisement more important to you?  What's the difference?

It disenfranchises rural voters, too. Nobody living in Kansas needs to bother voting for president.
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: Shooter Jones on December 13, 2019, 10:47:18 AM
It really is sad that the US still has constitutionally sanctioned voter suppression

It really is sad to LibBot idiots wanting to completely disenfranchise voters because they live in less populated areas and allow politicians to only pay attention to a select and very small grouping of meccas to urban sprawl.

But here we are.

More surprising that someone that has been utterly marginalized by his own party wants this.

The electoral college disenfranchises voters who live in heavily populated areas.   Why are rural voters disenfranchisement more important to you?  What's the difference?

It disenfranchises rural voters, too. Nobody living in Kansas needs to bother voting for president.

Without doing much research, I believe Al Gore would've won the 2000 election if no one in Kansas voted.
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: catastrophe on December 13, 2019, 10:59:36 AM
This is getting pretty OT. My point is that if we can’t rein in the power of the President we need a system where the public actually elects one.
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: Shooter Jones on December 13, 2019, 11:10:09 AM
This is getting pretty OT. My point is that if we can’t rein in the power of the President we need a system where the public actually elects one.

Let's be honest. It was never a systemic issue 40 months ago.

It became an issue when Hillary ran a trash campaign, ignored many swing states and got absolutely destroyed in the EC by a strategy involving/led by a complete dumbshit named Donald Trump.

Dems still can't handle it, but have no one to blame but themselves, not the system.
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: Institutional Control on December 13, 2019, 11:13:48 AM
It was a big deal in 2000.
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: Shooter Jones on December 13, 2019, 11:33:14 AM
It was a big deal in 2000.

How hard has the push for system change been since 2000? Maybe I missed it.
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: Institutional Control on December 13, 2019, 11:42:26 AM
There's no big push because it's not something that will ever happen.  You would need 2/3 of the states to vote to kill the EC. So basically, the states who benefit the most from the EC would have to agree to concede that power that they have.  And they won't.  But, when a president is elected by the EC and not the popular vote, people are reminded what a mumped up stupid system it is.
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: Woogy on December 13, 2019, 12:28:45 PM
When winning the popular vote is less than 30% of eligible voters, that's not a solution either. 70% of the country would have a direct claim of "I didn't vote for them."
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: star seed 7 on December 13, 2019, 12:38:27 PM
That's the stupidest argument for the ec I've ever heard, congratulations
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: sys on December 13, 2019, 12:47:29 PM
the ec doesn't systematically disadvantage either rural or urban voters.  nor does it systematically benefit either dems or pubs.  good grief.
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: Woogy on December 13, 2019, 12:49:21 PM
I didn't say it was an argument *for* the EC, but against the "popular" vote as its thrown about today. Pat yourself, bub.
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: star seed 7 on December 13, 2019, 01:02:11 PM
That's the stupidest argument against the popular vote I've ever heard, congratulations
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: Cire on December 13, 2019, 01:07:57 PM
Gerrymandering is a way bigger problem than the EC
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: Rage Against the McKee on December 13, 2019, 01:12:45 PM
There's no big push because it's not something that will ever happen.  You would need 2/3 of the states to vote to kill the EC. So basically, the states who benefit the most from the EC would have to agree to concede that power that they have.  And they won't.  But, when a president is elected by the EC and not the popular vote, people are reminded what a mumped up stupid system it is.

We really just need more than 50% of the electoral votes to sign onto the national popular vote interstate compact. Currently there are enough states with legislative pending to make that happen, but I expect it to die in committee in the more conservative states like Kansas.
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: sonofdaxjones on December 13, 2019, 01:41:34 PM
Two new things added this week

LibBots:

eff the Woods Procedures because OrangeMan Bad

eff the Great Compromise because OrangeMan Bad

Check . . . got it

Title: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: catastrophe on December 13, 2019, 01:42:46 PM
When winning the popular vote is less than 30% of eligible voters, that's not a solution either. 70% of the country would have a direct claim of "I didn't vote for them."

A lot of people in deep red and blue states don’t vote for president because they know their vote won’t get counted.
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: catastrophe on December 13, 2019, 01:43:47 PM
Gerrymandering is a way bigger problem than the EC

Yes but even further OT.
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: sonofdaxjones on December 13, 2019, 01:46:20 PM
People like LibBot.9 want a plebiscite because they can't resist the siren song of a dictatorship (a dictatorship that is inline with their political beliefs of course)

First the plebiscite, next, undoing presidential term limits.

Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: catastrophe on December 13, 2019, 01:53:43 PM
I’ll bet Dax was rough ridin' pissed when they started allowing the direct election of senators.
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: star seed 7 on December 13, 2019, 01:56:43 PM
I’ll bet Dax was rough ridin' pissed when they started allowing the direct election of senators.

Not even joking, this is a very popular position on texags
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: sonofdaxjones on December 13, 2019, 02:03:11 PM
I’ll bet Dax was rough ridin' pissed when they started allowing the direct election of senators.

I'll note that I'm talking with two total weirdos who apparently pine for "elections" like that have in Russia and elsewhere.  Are you two short in stature?  Ever diagnosed with certain "complexes"?

Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: catastrophe on December 13, 2019, 02:20:05 PM
Ugh. You just never like to see someone scraping the bottom of the argument barrel like that.
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: Woogy on December 13, 2019, 04:43:55 PM
When winning the popular vote is less than 30% of eligible voters, that's not a solution either. 70% of the country would have a direct claim of "I didn't vote for them."

A lot of people in deep red and blue states don’t vote for president because they know their vote won’t get counted.

Considering it would take 50+ million additional over Hillary's 65 million to get across the 50% of eligible voting eligible persons, I would say it's something more than just "my vote won't count cause I'm in state 'x'."
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: sys on December 13, 2019, 04:46:27 PM
You say this with certainty, perhaps I took this article at face value too much.

https://www.vox.com/policy-and-politics/2019/9/17/20868790/republicans-lose-popular-vote-win-electoral-college

oh yeah, it definitely advantaged 'pubs in 2016 and very likely will in 2020 as well, but those aren't structurally baked in.  in 2004, 2008 and 2012 it favored the dems.  it just depends on which party is wasting votes by winning states by a lot and which party is winning the nailbiters.
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: SkinnyBenny on December 13, 2019, 05:56:22 PM
It was a big deal in 2000.

How hard has the push for system change been since 2000? Maybe I missed it.

I mean, were you paying attention around that time? Because the push was big and has been ever since. It was a big rough ridin' deal.
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: steve dave on December 14, 2019, 11:35:02 AM
(https://media2.giphy.com/media/3q3QK6KyDVUBzih7hB/giphy.gif)


https://twitter.com/acyn/status/1205673727737749504


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: Shooter Jones on December 14, 2019, 11:13:19 PM
It was a big deal in 2000.

How hard has the push for system change been since 2000? Maybe I missed it.

I mean, were you paying attention around that time? Because the push was big and has been ever since. It was a big rough ridin' deal.

Recounts, a few months of conversations, and then :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: chum1 on December 16, 2019, 08:29:43 AM
https://twitter.com/kyledcheney/status/1206528529518727168
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: Shooter Jones on December 16, 2019, 09:10:05 AM
LMAO

https://twitter.com/cnnbrk/status/1205972376455962624
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: star seed 7 on December 16, 2019, 09:19:19 AM
He's polling in the 20's by democrats in his district. He's desperate because he knows he won't make it out of the primary
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: steve dave on December 16, 2019, 09:23:47 AM
That’s some tasty demagogue’ing


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: star seed 7 on December 16, 2019, 11:31:32 AM
Republicans man, lmao

https://twitter.com/atrupar/status/1206618023030857730
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: Shooter Jones on December 16, 2019, 02:13:44 PM
I don't see anything wrong with it.

She thinks he should be impeached, doesn't mean he will and if he isn't he will absolutely be the candidate in 2020, going against (more than likely) another absolutely terrible candidate (probs Biden).

Hey, there will be 2 complete crap candidates, so I can't rule anything out.

LMAO
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: sonofdaxjones on December 16, 2019, 02:16:41 PM
I don't see anything wrong with it.

She thinks he should be impeached, doesn't mean he will and if he isn't he will absolutely be the candidate in 2020, going against (more than likely) another absolutely terrible candidate (probs Biden).

Hey, there will be 2 complete crap candidates, so I can't rule anything out.

LMAO

Shooter, you know as well as I do that LibBot Nation is going to put on their arm bands, shine up those jackboots and goose step all the way to the polls for their guy, the mega corrupt-war mongering-racist, ChiCom Joe.   

Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: chum1 on December 16, 2019, 02:18:28 PM
That sentence is rough ridin' hilarious.
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: star seed 7 on December 16, 2019, 02:29:26 PM
It's trying so hard lol
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: MakeItRain on December 16, 2019, 02:35:15 PM
He's polling in the 20's by democrats in his district. He's desperate because he knows he won't make it out of the primary

I love that they're begging so hard for him to become a R knowing full well the party or their supporters will back him in the primary.
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: MakeItRain on December 16, 2019, 02:36:51 PM
Shooter being full MAGA was a shock to me when I realized it. Was I not paying attention before?
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: bucket on December 16, 2019, 02:38:22 PM
Shooter being full MAGA was a shock to me when I realized it. Was I not paying attention before?

No, he just recently discovered the pit.
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: catastrophe on December 16, 2019, 02:38:33 PM
Dax finally got through to someone.
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: waks on December 16, 2019, 02:41:40 PM
I don't see anything wrong with it.

She thinks he should be impeached, doesn't mean he will and if he isn't he will absolutely be the candidate in 2020, going against (more than likely) another absolutely terrible candidate (probs Biden).

Hey, there will be 2 complete crap candidates, so I can't rule anything out.

LMAO

Shooter, you know as well as I do that LibBot Nation is going to put on their arm bands, shine up those jackboots and goose step all the way to the polls for their guy, the mega corrupt-war mongering-racist, ChiCom Joe.
Oh, the irony
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: Shooter Jones on December 16, 2019, 03:54:22 PM
LOL. Stop it, guys.
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: sonofdaxjones on December 16, 2019, 04:39:14 PM
I don't see anything wrong with it.

She thinks he should be impeached, doesn't mean he will and if he isn't he will absolutely be the candidate in 2020, going against (more than likely) another absolutely terrible candidate (probs Biden).

Hey, there will be 2 complete crap candidates, so I can't rule anything out.

LMAO

Shooter, you know as well as I do that LibBot Nation is going to put on their arm bands, shine up those jackboots and goose step all the way to the polls for their guy, the mega corrupt-war mongering-racist, ChiCom Joe.
Oh, the irony

Yes, the irony that appears to be on the cusp of nominating the 2nd mega corrupt-war mongering-racist in a row for it's presidential candidate.  After being duped by another war monger for 8 years.

Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: DaBigTrain on December 16, 2019, 04:46:15 PM
:lol:
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: sonofdaxjones on December 16, 2019, 05:32:45 PM
:lol:

Not a laughing matter future brown shirt in the making.

Hillary "We will bring them to heal" Clinton and now mega corrupt Joe.

Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: 8manpick on December 16, 2019, 06:43:16 PM
We do want them to heal
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: LickNeckey on December 16, 2019, 07:21:30 PM
we hope his heels have healed

#teamtrump #bonespurs
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: Phil Titola on December 16, 2019, 07:24:26 PM
imagine if Dax was on the other side of this discussion, he gets a lot of use out of very few catch phrases (eg standdown, flexibility, bring them to heal"), he would go HAM with the material Trump and his administration puts out there on the daily.
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: waks on December 17, 2019, 12:23:22 AM
What would dax's Lib sock be  :confused:
daughterofmotherjones
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: sonofdaxjones on December 17, 2019, 05:48:18 AM
Oh no guys, perpetual outrage/cancel culture LibBot Nation is enough. 



Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: steve dave on December 17, 2019, 05:59:52 AM
cancel culture, lmao


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: sonofdaxjones on December 17, 2019, 06:39:57 AM
cancel culture, lmao


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Your guy Barack even talked about it awhile back, in between the nightmares remembering bombing those 3rd world countries into submission your guy had a salient thought.

Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: sonofdaxjones on December 17, 2019, 07:41:42 AM
Just want to thank Chuckie Schumer for contradicting almost word for word what he said about the 1999 impeachment.

Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: Institutional Control on December 17, 2019, 08:06:54 AM
Just want to thank Chuckie Schumer for contradicting almost word for word what he said about the 1999 impeachment.

He's just trying to keep up with McConnell who has done the same. 
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: sonofdaxjones on December 17, 2019, 08:10:09 AM
Just want to thank Chuckie Schumer for contradicting almost word for word what he said about the 1999 impeachment.

He's just trying to keep up with McConnell who has done the same.

But I thought you guys were above all of that  :frown:
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: Rage Against the McKee on December 17, 2019, 08:11:02 AM
Cancel culture is just morally wrong. We should all continue contributing time and money to people we find repugnant. It's not like any of us have anything better to do.
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: steve dave on December 17, 2019, 01:45:37 PM
the MAGA in the wild

https://twitter.com/thedailyshow/status/1206945558679707649


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: Katpappy on December 17, 2019, 01:52:51 PM
the MAGA in the wild

https://twitter.com/thedailyshow/status/1206945558679707649


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Rubes...  :ROFL:
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: Dugout DickStone on December 17, 2019, 02:16:09 PM
the MAGA in the wild

https://twitter.com/thedailyshow/status/1206945558679707649


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Rubes...  :ROFL:

 :Carl: can we rename this one MAGA?
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: star seed 7 on December 17, 2019, 02:37:41 PM
I'm sure dax is quite concerned about this unilateral draconian proclamation of a dictatorial nature that draws simpletons like a moth to light  :Chirp:

https://twitter.com/atrupar/status/1207028418656768000
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: passranch on December 17, 2019, 03:07:52 PM
the MAGA in the wild

https://twitter.com/thedailyshow/status/1206945558679707649


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Those have to all be actors, no?  Looks fake.
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: Brock Landers on December 17, 2019, 03:23:17 PM
I'm sure dax is quite concerned about this unilateral draconian proclamation of a dictatorial nature that draws simpletons like a moth to light  :Chirp:

https://twitter.com/atrupar/status/1207028418656768000

Hey NBD, just our President wishing for a Member of Congress to be executed.
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: sonofdaxjones on December 18, 2019, 06:14:20 AM
Cancel culture is just morally wrong. We should all continue contributing time and money to people we find repugnant. It's not like any of us have anything better to do.

LOL, LibBot Perpetual Outrage dictates that even the slightest deviation from LibBot doctrine dictates cancellation and boycott. 

The dearest LibBot leader even called this out a few weeks ago, Barrack “bombs away” Obama. 
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: sonofdaxjones on December 18, 2019, 06:17:36 AM
I'm sure dax is quite concerned about this unilateral draconian proclamation of a dictatorial nature that draws simpletons like a moth to light  :Chirp:

https://twitter.com/atrupar/status/1207028418656768000

Hey NBD, just our President wishing for a Member of Congress to be executed.

Schiff could barely bring himself to acknowledge the FISA court abuses he adamantly dismissed out of hand a few weeks back.  The same guy who said he had “concrete evidence” of Trump-Russian COLUSION. 

In an unprecedented letter, the FISA court excoriated the FBI yesterday.  I’m sure you guys missed it.
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: steve dave on December 18, 2019, 06:39:52 AM
Yeah, I missed that


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: sonofdaxjones on December 18, 2019, 06:57:00 AM
Yeah, I missed that


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Gonna need some concrete evidence
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: star seed 7 on December 18, 2019, 07:05:41 AM
I'm sure dax is quite concerned about this unilateral draconian proclamation of a dictatorial nature that draws simpletons like a moth to light  :Chirp:

https://twitter.com/atrupar/status/1207028418656768000

Hey NBD, just our President wishing for a Member of Congress to be executed.

Schiff could barely bring himself to acknowledge the FISA court abuses he adamantly dismissed out of hand a few weeks back.  The same guy who said he had “concrete evidence” of Trump-Russian COLUSION. 

In an unprecedented letter, the FISA court excoriated the FBI yesterday.  I’m sure you guys missed it.

Do you agree with the president that shiffty should be executed?
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: steve dave on December 18, 2019, 07:52:17 AM
Lmaoooooo


https://twitter.com/owillis/status/1207061939106566150


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: MakeItRain on December 18, 2019, 09:16:01 AM
Lmaoooooo


https://twitter.com/owillis/status/1207061939106566150


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Her reaction was fantastic
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: steve dave on December 18, 2019, 10:58:28 AM
lmao


https://twitter.com/kevinmkruse/status/1207343306864287744


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: catastrophe on December 18, 2019, 12:50:11 PM
Lmaoooooo


https://twitter.com/owillis/status/1207061939106566150


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Her reaction was fantastic

I thought she handled it well.
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: MakeItRain on December 18, 2019, 01:08:41 PM
Why is Roger Marshall shouting?
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: Rage Against the McKee on December 18, 2019, 01:11:14 PM
I appreciate that Marshall is better than Huelskamp, but he still sucks.
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: steve dave on December 18, 2019, 01:53:50 PM
Holy crap, lmao

https://twitter.com/joshtpm/status/1207378548337598464



Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: steve dave on December 18, 2019, 01:58:32 PM
https://twitter.com/numbersmuncher/status/1207387098136940556


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: sonofdaxjones on December 18, 2019, 02:43:00 PM
What W was telling at least some substantial half truths about was/is kind of a big deal.

Problem is, a lot of favorite in LibBot Leadershp like the current Dem front runner were all for the same thing. 

Just need to get this straight now.   Pelosi et. al. didn't move on Bush for a really big deal that cost the nation trillions of dollars, but now they want to impeach Don because in their eyes he sort of abused his power some (asking about all the Mega Corrupt Joe Biden dealings in the Ukraine).   You all know the reason why this is, if you don't, you're an idiot, okay we know that, so make it bigger idiots.








Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: steve dave on December 18, 2019, 02:51:23 PM
Sort of abused his power some


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: steve dave on December 18, 2019, 02:59:50 PM
lmao


https://twitter.com/acyn/status/1207401283390279680


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: Dugout DickStone on December 18, 2019, 03:19:07 PM
lmao


https://twitter.com/acyn/status/1207401283390279680


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

lololo
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: star seed 7 on December 18, 2019, 03:25:53 PM
Sort of abused his power some


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 :lol:
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: sonofdaxjones on December 18, 2019, 03:28:47 PM
Well that's what people with certain opinions operating off of 2nd and 3rd hand information believe.

Very strong opinions about this from certain people, ya know.

Very strong . . . opinions.

Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: steve dave on December 18, 2019, 03:50:04 PM
Well that's what people with certain opinions operating off of 2nd and 3rd hand information believe.

Very strong opinions about this from certain people, ya know.

Very strong . . . opinions.


https://twitter.com/translaterealdt/status/1195523329513406464


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: sonofdaxjones on December 18, 2019, 03:51:31 PM
Well that's what people with certain opinions operating off of 2nd and 3rd hand information believe.

Very strong opinions about this from certain people, ya know.

Very strong . . . opinions.


https://twitter.com/translaterealdt/status/1195523329513406464


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Yes Steve, some people who were under oath gave some very strong Anti-Trump opinions. 

Thanks Captain Obvious aka SteveDave

Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: Trim on December 18, 2019, 03:53:53 PM
:lol:
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: Dugout DickStone on December 18, 2019, 03:54:53 PM
 :Carl: the official rube talking points are cratering
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: Trim on December 18, 2019, 04:03:43 PM
Good thing we never let things get to a point here at gE where SMF was testifying their opinions of us.
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: Dugout DickStone on December 18, 2019, 04:05:36 PM
Good thing we never let things get to a point here at gE where SMF was testifying their opinions of us.

Thank god
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: sonofdaxjones on December 18, 2019, 04:13:05 PM
Just like I would like to thank those who offered their opinion about Don Trump to reaffirm Schiff's opinions, I'd like to thank each of you for your opinion on the matter as well.

All of your opinions will be taken under consideration.

Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: Rage Against the McKee on December 18, 2019, 04:34:38 PM
https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/1207277859519238154
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: Trim on December 18, 2019, 04:55:13 PM
Good thing we never let things get to a point here at gE where SMF was testifying their opinions of us.

Thank god

Youtube also thinks we’re a bunch of punks and would’ve testified to the same.
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: chum1 on December 18, 2019, 07:34:45 PM
 :Woot:
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: Spracne on December 18, 2019, 07:53:46 PM
:Woot:
Pelosi gonna give you the stink eye for that.
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: steve dave on December 18, 2019, 07:56:20 PM
lmao


https://twitter.com/mmpadellan/status/1207368688741081088


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: sonofdaxjones on December 18, 2019, 08:41:21 PM
Man that ax that Lil Jerry Nadler had to grind must have been, like, huge.

Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: SkinnyBenny on December 18, 2019, 08:59:12 PM
dax, sorry your boy became #3 tonight :frown:
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: sonofdaxjones on December 18, 2019, 09:13:14 PM
dax, sorry your boy became #3 tonight :frown:

It's pretty fantastic, actually.

Just looking forward to Phase 4 (or is it 5?) of the 3 plus year meltdown because Hillary didn't win.

Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: SkinnyBenny on December 18, 2019, 09:23:07 PM
yes, you clearly love it and think it’s fantastic
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: sonofdaxjones on December 18, 2019, 09:28:27 PM
yes, you clearly love it and think it’s fantastic

Who wouldn't.

If you're just gonna pop in and stalk me, be better . . .

Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: SkinnyBenny on December 18, 2019, 09:30:37 PM
Yes, that’s what’s happening
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: SkinnyBenny on December 18, 2019, 09:32:08 PM
Smdh at all this image shaming:

https://mobile.twitter.com/SheilaGaston200/status/1207360431569825792
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: sonofdaxjones on December 18, 2019, 09:32:26 PM
Yes, that’s what’s happening

The vast majority of your history of posting on this forum is responding to me.   

As anyone seen Chin and SB in the same room at the same time, if so, were there two people?

Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: sonofdaxjones on December 18, 2019, 09:34:13 PM
Smdh at all this image shaming:

https://mobile.twitter.com/SheilaGaston200/status/1207360431569825792

Translation:  I fully supported regime change (killing thousands), refugee'ing (displacing hundreds of thousands), spying on Congress, throwing whistle blowers in jail, and bombing 7 different countries on the same day etc. etc.  Because I thought Obama was "cool".

Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: steve dave on December 18, 2019, 09:41:20 PM
when you do blatant crimes it's not very hard tbh

https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/1178989254309011456
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: Katpappy on December 18, 2019, 11:23:53 PM
https://twitter.com/numbersmuncher/status/1207387098136940556


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

I posted this very same thing about Bush's war for oil a few years back.  I think this interview with Trump might have been when he was a Democrat.
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: Katpappy on December 18, 2019, 11:30:09 PM
What W was telling at least some substantial half truths about was/is kind of a big deal.

Problem is, a lot of favorite in LibBot Leadershp like the current Dem front runner were all for the same thing. 

Just need to get this straight now.   Pelosi et. al. didn't move on Bush for a really big deal that cost the nation trillions of dollars, but now they want to impeach Don because in their eyes he sort of abused his power some (asking about all the Mega Corrupt Joe Biden dealings in the Ukraine).   You all know the reason why this is, if you don't, you're an idiot, okay we know that, so make it bigger idiots.

You're right, Bush should have been impeached for war crimes along with oil CEO VP.  But no, they impeached Bill for a lousy BJ.  Just shows rubes are all over the place. 
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: steve dave on December 18, 2019, 11:43:07 PM
Katdaddy, you are the moral compass of gE


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: Katpappy on December 19, 2019, 12:06:49 AM
TY    :thumbs:
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: sonofdaxjones on December 19, 2019, 07:02:51 AM
What W was telling at least some substantial half truths about was/is kind of a big deal.

Problem is, a lot of favorite in LibBot Leadershp like the current Dem front runner were all for the same thing. 

Just need to get this straight now.   Pelosi et. al. didn't move on Bush for a really big deal that cost the nation trillions of dollars, but now they want to impeach Don because in their eyes he sort of abused his power some (asking about all the Mega Corrupt Joe Biden dealings in the Ukraine).   You all know the reason why this is, if you don't, you're an idiot, okay we know that, so make it bigger idiots.

You're right, Bush should have been impeached for war crimes along with oil CEO VP.  But no, they impeached Bill for a lousy BJ.  Just shows rubes are all over the place.

Wasn’t Bill guilty of perjury?


Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: wetwillie on December 19, 2019, 07:05:48 AM
So now what? House can just sit on the articles and not even send them over now right?
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: steve dave on December 19, 2019, 08:02:17 AM
(https://uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/20191219/0deee02ae28a1063e2a2e87a00f6e4cd.jpg)


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: sonofdaxjones on December 19, 2019, 08:23:32 AM
Nancy gonna hold on to the articles trying to influence the Senate process.   :lol:

Senate has sole purview over Impeachment trials, Nancy.

Pretty desperate move by Nancy "the occasional cognizant thought" Policy
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: sonofdaxjones on December 19, 2019, 10:15:56 AM
Agree to convict the accused and we’ll send over the charges (LibDerp Leadership).
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: sonofdaxjones on December 19, 2019, 10:16:52 AM
The American people would be doing the influencing on if the Senate is going to go with a bipartisan agreement or a partisan one pushed through by Mitch for how the Senate wants to hold their trial.

Yes, now that’s in the Senate we demand bipartisanship (LibBot Nation)
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: Katpappy on December 19, 2019, 10:17:52 AM
What W was telling at least some substantial half truths about was/is kind of a big deal.

Problem is, a lot of favorite in LibBot Leadershp like the current Dem front runner were all for the same thing. 

Just need to get this straight now.   Pelosi et. al. didn't move on Bush for a really big deal that cost the nation trillions of dollars, but now they want to impeach Don because in their eyes he sort of abused his power some (asking about all the Mega Corrupt Joe Biden dealings in the Ukraine).   You all know the reason why this is, if you don't, you're an idiot, okay we know that, so make it bigger idiots.

You're right, Bush should have been impeached for war crimes along with oil CEO VP.  But no, they impeached Bill for a lousy BJ.  Just shows rubes are all over the place.

Wasn’t Bill guilty of perjury?

Yes, lying about the rough ridin' blow job that an ugly Rube clerk that the old sex raping approving Baylor President Ken Star got a the gossip from.
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: sonofdaxjones on December 19, 2019, 10:18:50 AM
What W was telling at least some substantial half truths about was/is kind of a big deal.

Problem is, a lot of favorite in LibBot Leadershp like the current Dem front runner were all for the same thing. 

Just need to get this straight now.   Pelosi et. al. didn't move on Bush for a really big deal that cost the nation trillions of dollars, but now they want to impeach Don because in their eyes he sort of abused his power some (asking about all the Mega Corrupt Joe Biden dealings in the Ukraine).   You all know the reason why this is, if you don't, you're an idiot, okay we know that, so make it bigger idiots.

You're right, Bush should have been impeached for war crimes along with oil CEO VP.  But no, they impeached Bill for a lousy BJ.  Just shows rubes are all over the place.

Wasn’t Bill guilty of perjury?

Yes, lying about the rough ridin' blow job that an ugly Rube clerk that the old sex raping approving Baylor President Ken Star got a the gossip from.

That you lil Jerry Nadler?
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: Phil Titola on December 19, 2019, 10:31:30 AM
Agree to convict the accused and we’ll send over the charges (LibDerp Leadership).

I'm excited to hear the defense witnesses in this trial.
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: Katpappy on December 19, 2019, 10:38:49 AM
What W was telling at least some substantial half truths about was/is kind of a big deal.

Problem is, a lot of favorite in LibBot Leadershp like the current Dem front runner were all for the same thing. 

Just need to get this straight now.   Pelosi et. al. didn't move on Bush for a really big deal that cost the nation trillions of dollars, but now they want to impeach Don because in their eyes he sort of abused his power some (asking about all the Mega Corrupt Joe Biden dealings in the Ukraine).   You all know the reason why this is, if you don't, you're an idiot, okay we know that, so make it bigger idiots.

You're right, Bush should have been impeached for war crimes along with oil CEO VP.  But no, they impeached Bill for a lousy BJ.  Just shows rubes are all over the place.

Wasn’t Bill guilty of perjury?

Yes, lying about the rough ridin' blow job that an ugly Rube clerk that the old sex raping approving Baylor President Ken Star got a the gossip from.

That you lil Jerry Nadler?

Your hero Ken Starr got the ugly rube to get the BJ dress so he could have a case that they spent millions on.  Talk about a fibrinous rough ridin' reason to impeach a sitting president.  Pubs were constant whinnying crybaby fucks the whole time that Clinton was President, even thou we had a very thriving economy.  Maybe that's why Pubs are so jealous of the man.
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: gatoveintisiete on December 19, 2019, 10:44:37 AM
What W was telling at least some substantial half truths about was/is kind of a big deal.

Problem is, a lot of favorite in LibBot Leadershp like the current Dem front runner were all for the same thing. 

Just need to get this straight now.   Pelosi et. al. didn't move on Bush for a really big deal that cost the nation trillions of dollars, but now they want to impeach Don because in their eyes he sort of abused his power some (asking about all the Mega Corrupt Joe Biden dealings in the Ukraine).   You all know the reason why this is, if you don't, you're an idiot, okay we know that, so make it bigger idiots.

You're right, Bush should have been impeached for war crimes along with oil CEO VP.  But no, they impeached Bill for a lousy BJ.  Just shows rubes are all over the place.

Wasn’t Bill guilty of perjury?

Yes, lying about the rough ridin' blow job that an ugly Rube clerk that the old sex raping approving Baylor President Ken Star got a the gossip from.

That you lil Jerry Nadler?

Your hero Ken Starr got the ugly rube to get the BJ dress so he could have a case that they spent millions on.  Talk about a fibrinous rough ridin' reason to impeach a sitting president.  Pubs were constant whinnying crybaby fucks the whole time that Clinton was President, even thou we had a very thriving economy.  Maybe that's why Pubs are so jealous of the man.

You are not inadequate Katpappy
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: gatoveintisiete on December 19, 2019, 11:25:57 AM
We got set up by Mitch and Nancy again.  The other day Mitch and Lindsey come out and say that the impeachment is dead on arrival.  I thought thats strange why would you say that?  Why not just have your trial and be done with it.  Instead they give Nancy an out that things won't be fair in the senate.  Why?  Maybe these leaders are more interested in gaining control over Trump than anything else?
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: Shooter Jones on December 19, 2019, 11:27:43 AM
The American people would be doing the influencing on if the Senate is going to go with a bipartisan agreement or a partisan one pushed through by Mitch for how the Senate wants to hold their trial.

Yes, now that’s in the Senate we demand bipartisanship (LibBot Nation)

I've been pissed for years and years that each state gets 2 senators.

WYOMING HAS THE SAME AMOUNT AS CALIFORNIA!
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: sonofdaxjones on December 19, 2019, 11:31:43 AM
What W was telling at least some substantial half truths about was/is kind of a big deal.

Problem is, a lot of favorite in LibBot Leadershp like the current Dem front runner were all for the same thing. 

Just need to get this straight now.   Pelosi et. al. didn't move on Bush for a really big deal that cost the nation trillions of dollars, but now they want to impeach Don because in their eyes he sort of abused his power some (asking about all the Mega Corrupt Joe Biden dealings in the Ukraine).   You all know the reason why this is, if you don't, you're an idiot, okay we know that, so make it bigger idiots.

You're right, Bush should have been impeached for war crimes along with oil CEO VP.  But no, they impeached Bill for a lousy BJ.  Just shows rubes are all over the place.

Wasn’t Bill guilty of perjury?

Yes, lying about the rough ridin' blow job that an ugly Rube clerk that the old sex raping approving Baylor President Ken Star got a the gossip from.

That you lil Jerry Nadler?

Your hero Ken Starr got the ugly rube to get the BJ dress so he could have a case that they spent millions on.  Talk about a fibrinous rough ridin' reason to impeach a sitting president.  Pubs were constant whinnying crybaby fucks the whole time that Clinton was President, even thou we had a very thriving economy.  Maybe that's why Pubs are so jealous of the man.

Sorry friend, I thought the whole impeachment of Clinton was pretty stupid. 

I mean if they were going to impeach the guy it should have been for bombing a sovereign nation for 70 days with no congressional mandate and in violation of the NATO charter. 
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: sonofdaxjones on December 19, 2019, 11:33:43 AM
Only we can obstruct justice (LibDerp Leadership).
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: steve dave on December 19, 2019, 01:41:06 PM
MAGAs are so stupid


https://twitter.com/ddale8/status/1207733540395327493


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: star seed 7 on December 19, 2019, 01:44:00 PM
Dax will mention it in 3 days
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: sonofdaxjones on December 19, 2019, 01:48:47 PM
Dax will mention it in 3 days

Oh no, when it comes to seeing what fringe whack-a-doos and idiots are saying, I just have to come here and read what weirdo's like you are posting.

Albeit the Rush updates are pretty sparse these days.

Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: Dugout DickStone on December 19, 2019, 01:49:47 PM
when you do blatant crimes it's not very hard tbh

https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/1178989254309011456

lmfao
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: Dugout DickStone on December 19, 2019, 01:51:10 PM
(https://uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/20191219/0deee02ae28a1063e2a2e87a00f6e4cd.jpg)


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

amaze
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: Dugout DickStone on December 19, 2019, 02:12:26 PM
Dax will mention it in 3 days

Oh no, when it comes to seeing what fringe whack-a-doos and idiots are saying, I just have to come here and read what weirdo's like you are posting.

Albeit the Rush updates are pretty sparse these days.

dude.  you read the Epoch times
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: Phil Titola on December 19, 2019, 02:26:10 PM
Dax will mention it in 3 days

Oh no, when it comes to seeing what fringe whack-a-doos and idiots are saying, I just have to come here and read what weirdo's like you are posting.

Albeit the Rush updates are pretty sparse these days.

Says dax who pours through Twitter replies and amplifies the one idiotic fringe post as "libtard nation" or whatever cutsie nickname he was told to brand everybody not in lockstep with DJT
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: Trim on December 19, 2019, 03:33:23 PM
Dax will mention it in 3 days

Oh no, when it comes to seeing what fringe whack-a-doos and idiots are saying, I just have to come here and read what weirdo's like you are posting.

Albeit the Rush updates are pretty sparse these days.

Says dax who pours through Twitter replies and amplifies the one idiotic fringe post as "libtard nation" or whatever cutsie nickname he was told to brand everybody not in lockstep with DJT


There's a more formal process than that.

https://www.mcclatchydc.com/news/politics-government/white-house/article238541448.html?
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: MakeItRain on December 20, 2019, 06:23:44 AM
Log Cabin MAGA
https://twitter.com/ScottFrantz74/status/1207481832394104833
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: wetwillie on December 20, 2019, 07:17:41 AM
Oof
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: sonofdaxjones on December 20, 2019, 07:56:35 AM
Lot a highly triggered posters.  Surprising.  Okay, not really.
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: steve dave on December 20, 2019, 07:59:47 PM
could go in the POS thread

https://twitter.com/JeffFlake/status/1208169882405093376
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: catastrophe on December 20, 2019, 09:13:13 PM
Dear Republicans, please join me in saying moderate sounding things. No need to actually do anything differently of course.
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: steve dave on December 21, 2019, 08:04:27 AM
There is bipartisan agreement


https://twitter.com/numbersmuncher/status/1208187223792922626


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: Shooter Jones on December 21, 2019, 08:51:13 AM
Just hoping it’s a fair process in the senate and not a partisan crap show.

The country deserves better than that.
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: steve dave on December 21, 2019, 09:07:23 AM
https://twitter.com/dabeard/status/1208376599118258177


https://twitter.com/dabeard/status/1208377623698661376


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: Ksuminnesotacat on December 21, 2019, 09:44:50 AM
Stick and String SD for house chairmanship he can find more evidence for thirty seven cents than the three million and twelve weeks spent by the democrat controlled house!
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: chum1 on December 23, 2019, 01:32:22 PM
GEEZ RUDY

https://twitter.com/gtconway3d/status/1209187440474415105
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: MakeItRain on December 23, 2019, 01:43:07 PM
Just hoping it’s a fair process in the senate and not a partisan crap show.

The country deserves better than that.

We'd all love that but alas it ain't going to happen, Mitch has made his mind up.
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: steve dave on December 23, 2019, 03:39:44 PM
Liberal rag National Review calls for removal from office


https://www.nationalreview.com/magazine/2019/12/31/four-tests-for-impeachment/


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: MakeItRain on December 23, 2019, 11:37:52 PM
Liberal rag National Review calls for removal from office


https://www.nationalreview.com/magazine/2019/12/31/four-tests-for-impeachment/


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 :horrorsurprise: that's a really big deal, much more significant than "ET."
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: steve dave on December 24, 2019, 07:04:57 AM
https://twitter.com/heidinbc/status/1209222681704435712


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: SkinnyBenny on December 25, 2019, 06:29:31 AM
Dude’s guilty as crap
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: Brock Landers on December 25, 2019, 12:25:32 PM
Of course he is.  Is it going to matter?  Probably not.
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: DaBigTrain on December 25, 2019, 08:13:30 PM
"Best President ever."

- Dax
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: chum1 on January 02, 2020, 08:44:37 AM
https://twitter.com/just_security/status/1212734147803975681
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: star seed 7 on January 02, 2020, 08:49:07 AM
Getting sick of these Pentagon never trump super libs
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: steve dave on January 02, 2020, 09:15:23 AM
With our military JAG officers repeatedly convicting his White House guests of war crimes and the Libtard Pentagon working against him I think SpaceForce may be the last MAGA holdout.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: DaBigTrain on January 02, 2020, 12:02:04 PM
Dax will need some time to review the new marching order talking points on how this is ok.
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: Dugout DickStone on January 02, 2020, 01:56:18 PM
Dax will need some time to review the new marching order talking points on how this is ok.

He just split.
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: chum1 on January 03, 2020, 12:32:24 PM
https://twitter.com/kyledcheney/status/1213153769111863303
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: sonofdaxjones on January 03, 2020, 12:46:45 PM
No questions asked, no demands made foreign aid and military assistance.   Good stuff LibBots.

Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: chum1 on January 03, 2020, 01:12:04 PM
 :Woot:

https://twitter.com/amarimow/status/1213145088123133952
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: sonofdaxjones on January 03, 2020, 01:30:54 PM
LibBots will stop at nothing to protect their corruption.

Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: DaBigTrain on January 03, 2020, 01:33:37 PM
Devout Trumpers will abandon anything they stand for personally to agree with and appease their dear leader.
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: sonofdaxjones on January 03, 2020, 01:35:53 PM
Devout Trumpers will abandon anything they stand for personally to agree with and appease their dear leader.

Circling the wagons to protect their mega corrupt leadership is what LibBot Nation does best, if it takes multiple articles of impeaches, so be it.

Non thinking LibBot Brownshirts like The Big Dummy are 1000% behind this.   



Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: Phil Titola on January 04, 2020, 10:14:19 AM
We know we broke the law but....

https://www.vanityfair.com/news/2020/01/donald-trump-ukraine-aid-emails
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: steve dave on January 04, 2020, 04:08:40 PM
https://twitter.com/kylegriffin1/status/1213270127766056960


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: sonofdaxjones on January 06, 2020, 08:27:19 AM
Still waiting . . . But ya see, this has nothing to do with the 2020 election.
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: steve dave on January 06, 2020, 10:55:48 AM
https://twitter.com/UrbanAchievr/status/1214228669083852801
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: chum1 on January 06, 2020, 12:02:52 PM
Fascinating

https://twitter.com/AaronBlake/status/1214231862589173760
https://twitter.com/ShimonPro/status/1214240544949489667
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: chum1 on January 06, 2020, 02:50:33 PM
https://twitter.com/guypbenson/status/1214280965419343872
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: chum1 on January 08, 2020, 09:08:15 PM
https://twitter.com/rachaelmbade/status/1215093226551619588
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: star seed 7 on January 08, 2020, 10:05:57 PM
Mitch is very good at his job. Keeping that circus out of the senate should be a high priority
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: waks on January 09, 2020, 03:15:15 AM
OMG I sincerely hope Trump chooses Jim Jordan to defend him. Holy crap.
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: Katpappy on January 09, 2020, 03:21:47 AM
YES, would be a loud circus act perfect for the clown show.  :excited:
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: Phil Titola on January 09, 2020, 06:48:16 AM
Kinda disappointed they are passing over our guy dax.
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: Dugout DickStone on January 09, 2020, 08:05:45 AM
Kinda disappointed they are passing over our guy dax.

I’m not sure Qanon/Pizzagate/windmill noise brain cancer is the public image they shooting for
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: sonofdaxjones on January 09, 2020, 08:12:24 AM
Couldn't make it, Nancy is pushing this extremely urgent issue so hard and my current calendar is so compressed that I told my guy Mitch I'd just have to pass.   I lamented to my guy Mitch that I wish Slurs Pelosi (who told everyone to pray the other night at the bar opening she was at) would just hold her damn horses on this thing. 

My guy Mitch went on and on about how he can't believe how expeditiously the Speaker was moving on this thing.   
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: Phil Titola on January 09, 2020, 08:30:59 AM
The ability to go at Democrats for drinking and speech and at the same time backing every second of the literal dumbest president we've ever seen in person is a special gift.
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: chum1 on January 10, 2020, 09:32:02 AM
 :sdeek:

https://twitter.com/CMSeeberger/status/1215646456637480962
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: bucket on January 10, 2020, 09:39:43 AM
:sdeek:

https://twitter.com/CMSeeberger/status/1215646456637480962

You luked yourself, man!
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: sonofdaxjones on January 10, 2020, 10:04:24 AM
The ability to go at Democrats for drinking and speech and at the same time backing every second of the literal dumbest president we've ever seen in person is a special gift.

I'm sorry this process is so  :lol: and you're angry that people are  :lol: at this process.
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: Dugout DickStone on January 10, 2020, 10:06:22 AM
The ability to go at Democrats for drinking and speech and at the same time backing every second of the literal dumbest president we've ever seen in person is a special gift.

I'm sorry this process is so  :lol: and you're angry that people are  :lol: at this process.

dax and I agree on another thing.  this is legit stupid
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: steve dave on January 10, 2020, 02:56:19 PM
https://twitter.com/juliadavisnews/status/1215727482898436096


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: sonofdaxjones on January 11, 2020, 07:38:00 AM
Good. 

Executive privilege. 

Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: chum1 on January 11, 2020, 07:55:47 AM
Nixon also attempted to use executive privilege when it did not apply. As a cover-up, of course.
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: catastrophe on January 11, 2020, 11:21:33 AM
Good. 

Executive privilege.

What is the concern? I thought Trump has been very open about the strategy behind the Ukraine call?
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: SkinnyBenny on January 11, 2020, 12:24:15 PM
Trump has absolutely nothing to hide, which is why he is hiding literally everything he possibly can about this.
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: LickNeckey on January 12, 2020, 12:21:30 AM
Good. 

Executive privilege.

 :ROFL:
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: MakeItRain on January 12, 2020, 10:54:36 PM
Good. 

Executive privilege.

(https://s3.dualstack.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/static.funnyshirts.org/images/design_easy_customization/678edba37ee9c286d66c22dbded68ef3_2667703_0_75d1d002a7a333eee9434bd6edf23d55_bigger.jpg?t=1578891202)
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: star seed 7 on January 13, 2020, 07:31:08 AM
:Keke:
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: sonofdaxjones on January 13, 2020, 09:58:45 AM
For as ragey  :curse: :curse: as LibDork Nation has been, and for as urgent as this was supposed to be . . . Slurs sure is taking her time.



Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: sonofdaxjones on January 13, 2020, 10:01:27 AM
Good. 

Executive privilege.

(https://s3.dualstack.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/static.funnyshirts.org/images/design_easy_customization/678edba37ee9c286d66c22dbded68ef3_2667703_0_75d1d002a7a333eee9434bd6edf23d55_bigger.jpg?t=1578891202)

LibBot Parrot Person nation never had a problem with regurgitating what the supreme commander told them to say during the previous administration . . . to the point LibBot Goose Steppers actually believed and parroted the notion repeatedly that a YouTube video killed a U.S. Ambassador.

Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: chum1 on January 13, 2020, 10:29:25 AM
https://twitter.com/KlasfeldReports/status/1216752802745196547
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: MakeItRain on January 13, 2020, 10:53:59 AM
Good. 

Executive privilege.

(https://s3.dualstack.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/static.funnyshirts.org/images/design_easy_customization/678edba37ee9c286d66c22dbded68ef3_2667703_0_75d1d002a7a333eee9434bd6edf23d55_bigger.jpg?t=1578891202)

LibBot Parrot Person nation never had a problem with regurgitating what the supreme commander told them to say during the previous administration . . . to the point LibBot Goose Steppers actually believed and parroted the notion repeatedly that a YouTube video killed a U.S. Ambassador.

Bold to attempt to play this note with me. I've been the biggest Obama critic on this board. I actually have coherent arguments other than beige man bad.
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: Dugout DickStone on January 13, 2020, 10:54:52 AM
That hat has done some big triggering
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: sonofdaxjones on January 13, 2020, 11:13:05 AM
Good. 

Executive privilege.

(https://s3.dualstack.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/static.funnyshirts.org/images/design_easy_customization/678edba37ee9c286d66c22dbded68ef3_2667703_0_75d1d002a7a333eee9434bd6edf23d55_bigger.jpg?t=1578891202)

LibBot Parrot Person nation never had a problem with regurgitating what the supreme commander told them to say during the previous administration . . . to the point LibBot Goose Steppers actually believed and parroted the notion repeatedly that a YouTube video killed a U.S. Ambassador.

Bold to attempt to play this note with me. I've been the biggest Obama critic on this board. I actually have coherent arguments other than beige man bad.

You’re just one angry socialist in a sea of LibDerpdom and rage.
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: chum1 on January 13, 2020, 07:29:31 PM
https://twitter.com/Yamiche/status/1216877775954546691
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: Rage Against the McKee on January 13, 2020, 09:12:34 PM
Pretty sad they can't get 53 to vote for that.
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: catastrophe on January 13, 2020, 09:33:43 PM
Witnesses at a trial?

Pffffffft
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: chum1 on January 14, 2020, 06:27:43 AM
https://twitter.com/thehill/status/1216884161291661314
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: sonofdaxjones on January 14, 2020, 08:09:42 AM
Is Senator, excuse me, is Representative Slurs Pelosi going to get those crime less articles of impeachment sent over to the Senate this week? 

Title: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: catastrophe on January 14, 2020, 08:24:48 AM
Dax that’s an old talking point. I’m think now it’s “impeachment is a political process so we’re gonna be political about it.”
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: chum1 on January 14, 2020, 06:27:04 PM
 :sdeek:

https://twitter.com/NatashaBertrand/status/1217231422408273920
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: chum1 on January 14, 2020, 06:28:33 PM
https://twitter.com/RepValDemings/status/1217217497818128394
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: mocat on January 14, 2020, 06:36:29 PM
Is that how lefties write? Gross
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: chum1 on January 14, 2020, 06:51:04 PM
https://twitter.com/brianbeutler/status/1217220695404556288
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: chum1 on January 14, 2020, 08:11:48 PM
Lol

https://twitter.com/Popehat/status/1217229337771905026
https://twitter.com/Popehat/status/1217245254316806145
https://twitter.com/delexical/status/1217248492483158017
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: MakeItRain on January 15, 2020, 12:14:14 AM
The sad part of all of this is that there are so many characters like Robert Hyde, that when the Emmy award winning mini series happens in a decade, guys like this will only have bit parts when they really should be the whole show.
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: chum1 on January 15, 2020, 04:24:57 PM
Incredible

https://twitter.com/josephabondy/status/1217555691143155712
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: chum1 on January 15, 2020, 06:44:27 PM
https://twitter.com/rgoodlaw/status/1217603545022767104
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: DaBigTrain on January 15, 2020, 08:22:26 PM
 :drool:
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: chum1 on January 15, 2020, 08:25:22 PM
Lev says Pence and Bolton were others who were tasked with getting Zelensky to announce Biden investigation when they visited Ukraine.
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: chum1 on January 15, 2020, 08:39:07 PM
Lev also naming Barr.
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: star seed 7 on January 15, 2020, 08:45:01 PM
He's just trying to protect papa frontrunner Biden
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: chum1 on January 15, 2020, 08:56:53 PM
Lev says Nunes knew. Lol.
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: sonofdaxjones on January 15, 2020, 09:04:27 PM
Meanwhile Yova was blocking Visa’s of those seeking to come to the US to discuss corruption. 
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: chum1 on January 15, 2020, 09:06:36 PM
 :lol:
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: sonofdaxjones on January 15, 2020, 09:08:52 PM
:lol:

She blocked Lutsenko and others ChumDummy. 
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: chum1 on January 15, 2020, 09:12:56 PM
:lol:

She blocked Lutsenko and others ChumDummy.

Do you even know what Hillary was doing at the time???
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: sonofdaxjones on January 15, 2020, 09:15:52 PM
:lol:

She blocked Lutsenko and others ChumDummy.

Do you even know what Hillary was doing at the time???

Hillary was all over the Ukrainians . . . For help
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: chum1 on January 15, 2020, 09:22:06 PM
Lev is 47.
 :sdeek:

(https://dynaimage.cdn.cnn.com/cnn/c_fill,g_auto,w_1200,h_675,ar_16:9/https%3A%2F%2Fcdn.cnn.com%2Fcnnnext%2Fdam%2Fassets%2F200115192817-parnas-on-maddow.jpg)
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: sonofdaxjones on January 15, 2020, 09:24:02 PM
Lol, I love how the Lib preferred Ukrainians are 1000% telling the truth, but all the others are liars. 
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: Institutional Control on January 15, 2020, 09:33:00 PM
Meanwhile Yova was blocking Visa’s of those seeking to come to the US to discuss corruption.
(https://media1.giphy.com/media/gj0QdZ9FgqGhOBNlFS/giphy.gif)



Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: DaBigTrain on January 15, 2020, 09:33:36 PM
I love how Dax is such a good boy and never leaves his masters side
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: sonofdaxjones on January 15, 2020, 09:36:31 PM
I love how Dax is such a good boy and never leaves his masters side

I love how Da Big Dummy only parrots what he’s told.
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: sonofdaxjones on January 15, 2020, 09:37:48 PM
LibBot Nation:  We’ll believe every Ukrainian who says OrangeMan bad. 
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: DaBigTrain on January 15, 2020, 09:40:38 PM
I love how Dax is such a good boy and never leaves his masters side

I love how Da Big Dummy only parrots what he’s told.

Oh my the irony  :lol: :lol: :lol:
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: sonofdaxjones on January 15, 2020, 09:48:29 PM
I love how Dax is such a good boy and never leaves his masters side

I love how Da Big Dummy only parrots what he’s told.

Oh my the irony  :lol: :lol: :lol:

The irony of you trying to pretend you have the first clue as to what I’m talking about. 

But you guys protect your corruption better than anybody.  Even if it means believing Ukrainians . . . As long as they’re OrangeMan bad.   Weird, a few weeks ago we just couldn’t believe anything those lyin Ukrainians said, now it’s 1000% truth. 
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: 8manpick on January 15, 2020, 09:51:09 PM
You know Parnas is an American citizen who moved here when he was three years old, right? Of course you do
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: DaBigTrain on January 15, 2020, 09:51:38 PM
 :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: catastrophe on January 15, 2020, 09:52:14 PM
Dax are you saying you think it was terrible judgment for Trump and Rudy to trust this guy to help in their quest to fight corruption?
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: sonofdaxjones on January 15, 2020, 09:56:27 PM
You know Parnas is an American citizen who moved here when he was three years old, right? Of course you do

He’s a Ukrainian-American , with massive ties to his homeland. LOL, please.  He’s also been indicted.  Remember a few weeks ago he was the super corrupt dude working for Rudy.  Now you believe every word he says.



Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: DaBigTrain on January 15, 2020, 09:58:21 PM
You know Parnas is an American citizen who moved here when he was three years old, right? Of course you do

He’s a Ukrainian-American , with massive ties to his homeland. LOL, please.  He’s also been indicted.  Remember a few weeks ago he was the super corrupt dude working for Rudy.  Now you believe every word he says.

He gains what for lying at this point?  What does he gain telling the truth?
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: sonofdaxjones on January 15, 2020, 10:00:02 PM
Dax are you saying you think it was terrible judgment for Trump and Rudy to trust this guy to help in their quest to fight corruption?

Probably, but now that he’s OrangeMan bad he’s 1000% legit.

If you’re Vlad Putin you 1000% want Soccer Mom, ChiCom Joe or Bolshevik Bernie in the White House.   Because at least two of those will destroy the US energy sector, and at least two will cut the defense budget massively. 
Title: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: sonofdaxjones on January 15, 2020, 10:01:11 PM
You know Parnas is an American citizen who moved here when he was three years old, right? Of course you do

He’s a Ukrainian-American , with massive ties to his homeland. LOL, please.  He’s also been indicted.  Remember a few weeks ago he was the super corrupt dude working for Rudy.  Now you believe every word he says.

He gains what for lying at this point?  What does he gain telling the truth?

Leniency.  You’re beyond dumb.  The truth, LOL.
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: 8manpick on January 15, 2020, 10:01:30 PM
You know Parnas is an American citizen who moved here when he was three years old, right? Of course you do

He’s a Ukrainian-American , with massive ties to his homeland. LOL, please.  He’s also been indicted.  Remember a few weeks ago he was the super corrupt dude working for Rudy.  Now you believe every word he says.
Soviet-American.
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: sonofdaxjones on January 15, 2020, 10:03:07 PM
You know Parnas is an American citizen who moved here when he was three years old, right? Of course you do

He’s a Ukrainian-American , with massive ties to his homeland. LOL, please.  He’s also been indicted.  Remember a few weeks ago he was the super corrupt dude working for Rudy.  Now you believe every word he says.
Soviet-American.

Remember, LibBot rules dictate that all “Russians” are spies.   



Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: DaBigTrain on January 15, 2020, 10:03:49 PM
You know Parnas is an American citizen who moved here when he was three years old, right? Of course you do

He’s a Ukrainian-American , with massive ties to his homeland. LOL, please.  He’s also been indicted.  Remember a few weeks ago he was the super corrupt dude working for Rudy.  Now you believe every word he says.

He gains what for lying at this point?  What does he gain telling the truth?

Leniency.  You’re beyond dumb.  The truth, LOL.

Lying is HELPING his indictment and telling the truth is HURTING his case.  That's some sound logic you got there such a good boy.
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: DaBigTrain on January 15, 2020, 10:05:06 PM
You know Parnas is an American citizen who moved here when he was three years old, right? Of course you do

He’s a Ukrainian-American , with massive ties to his homeland. LOL, please.  He’s also been indicted.  Remember a few weeks ago he was the super corrupt dude working for Rudy.  Now you believe every word he says.
Soviet-American.

Remember, LibBot rules dictate that all “Russians” are spies.

Rudy is 100% American but sold his soul to the Ukrainians so obviously he should be trusted 100%.
Title: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: sonofdaxjones on January 15, 2020, 10:05:35 PM
You know Parnas is an American citizen who moved here when he was three years old, right? Of course you do

He’s a Ukrainian-American , with massive ties to his homeland. LOL, please.  He’s also been indicted.  Remember a few weeks ago he was the super corrupt dude working for Rudy.  Now you believe every word he says.

He gains what for lying at this point?  What does he gain telling the truth?

Leniency.  You’re beyond dumb.  The truth, LOL.

Lying is HELPING his indictment and telling the truth is HURTING his case.  That's some sound logic you got there such a good boy.

Lol, just a few weeks ago he was a lying Ukrainian thug working for Rudy.  Now he’s a 1000% truthful Ukrainian-American just lookin to get the truth out there. LOL.
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: 8manpick on January 15, 2020, 10:06:27 PM
You know Parnas is an American citizen who moved here when he was three years old, right? Of course you do

He’s a Ukrainian-American , with massive ties to his homeland. LOL, please.  He’s also been indicted.  Remember a few weeks ago he was the super corrupt dude working for Rudy.  Now you believe every word he says.
Soviet-American.

Remember, LibBot rules dictate that all “Russians” are spies.
Sure, sure.  IDK of any other than Butina, but whatever.  Just remember, this spy is American raised and educated. It's disingenuous to call him a Ukrainian, but you know that. It's just a game you play.
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: sonofdaxjones on January 15, 2020, 10:07:12 PM
You know Parnas is an American citizen who moved here when he was three years old, right? Of course you do

He’s a Ukrainian-American , with massive ties to his homeland. LOL, please.  He’s also been indicted.  Remember a few weeks ago he was the super corrupt dude working for Rudy.  Now you believe every word he says.
Soviet-American.

Remember, LibBot rules dictate that all “Russians” are spies.

Rudy is 100% American but sold his soul to the Ukrainians so obviously he should be trusted 100%.

Who said anything about believing Rudy?
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: DaBigTrain on January 15, 2020, 10:08:47 PM
You know Parnas is an American citizen who moved here when he was three years old, right? Of course you do

He’s a Ukrainian-American , with massive ties to his homeland. LOL, please.  He’s also been indicted.  Remember a few weeks ago he was the super corrupt dude working for Rudy.  Now you believe every word he says.
Soviet-American.

Remember, LibBot rules dictate that all “Russians” are spies.

Rudy is 100% American but sold his soul to the Ukrainians so obviously he should be trusted 100%.

Who said anything about believing Rudy?

 :lol: :lol:  REALLY?! Oh my.   :lol: :lol:
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: sonofdaxjones on January 15, 2020, 10:10:01 PM
You know Parnas is an American citizen who moved here when he was three years old, right? Of course you do

He’s a Ukrainian-American , with massive ties to his homeland. LOL, please.  He’s also been indicted.  Remember a few weeks ago he was the super corrupt dude working for Rudy.  Now you believe every word he says.
Soviet-American.

Remember, LibBot rules dictate that all “Russians” are spies.
Sure, sure.  IDK of any other than Butina, but whatever.  Just remember, this spy is American raised and educated. It's disingenuous to call him a Ukrainian, but you know that. It's just a game you play.

You know the whole of the Soviet Union wasn’t Russia proper, right??   The guy had massive dealings in the region.

But all Russians are spies per you guys, so until further notice this guy is Russian spy/Disinformation agent.  Those are your rules. 
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: sonofdaxjones on January 15, 2020, 10:11:31 PM
You know Parnas is an American citizen who moved here when he was three years old, right? Of course you do

He’s a Ukrainian-American , with massive ties to his homeland. LOL, please.  He’s also been indicted.  Remember a few weeks ago he was the super corrupt dude working for Rudy.  Now you believe every word he says.
Soviet-American.

Remember, LibBot rules dictate that all “Russians” are spies.

Rudy is 100% American but sold his soul to the Ukrainians so obviously he should be trusted 100%.

Who said anything about believing Rudy?

 :lol: :lol:  REALLY?! Oh my.   :lol: :lol:

Lol, so dumb.  Again, two weeks ago this guy was a Ukrainian thug. Now he’s just a Ukrainian-American looking for truth and justice.  LOL.
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: bucket on January 15, 2020, 10:12:46 PM
:lol:

She blocked Lutsenko and others ChumDummy.

I'm pretty sure only crazy people think Lutsenko wasn't corrupt as crap
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: 8manpick on January 15, 2020, 10:13:57 PM
You know Parnas is an American citizen who moved here when he was three years old, right? Of course you do

He’s a Ukrainian-American , with massive ties to his homeland. LOL, please.  He’s also been indicted.  Remember a few weeks ago he was the super corrupt dude working for Rudy.  Now you believe every word he says.
Soviet-American.

Remember, LibBot rules dictate that all “Russians” are spies.
Sure, sure.  IDK of any other than Butina, but whatever.  Just remember, this spy is American raised and educated. It's disingenuous to call him a Ukrainian, but you know that. It's just a game you play.

You know the whole of the Soviet Union wasn’t Russia proper, right??   The guy had massive dealings in the region.

But all Russians are spies per you guys, so until further notice this guy is Russian spy/Disinformation agent.  Those are your rules.
I didn't say a single word about Russia. I just talked about the guy who moved away from the current Ukraine in 1975 as a toddler (and AFAIK hasn't lived there again), that you keep calling a Ukrainian.
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: sonofdaxjones on January 15, 2020, 10:14:42 PM
:lol:

She blocked Lutsenko and others ChumDummy.

I'm pretty sure only crazy people don't think Lutsenko wasn't corrupt as crap

Yes, only Lib preferred Ukrainians aren’t corrupt. 

Look at this guy, two weeks ago corrupt AF (and indicted) now 1000% telling the truth. Lol.
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: sonofdaxjones on January 15, 2020, 10:16:10 PM
You know Parnas is an American citizen who moved here when he was three years old, right? Of course you do

He’s a Ukrainian-American , with massive ties to his homeland. LOL, please.  He’s also been indicted.  Remember a few weeks ago he was the super corrupt dude working for Rudy.  Now you believe every word he says.
Soviet-American.

Remember, LibBot rules dictate that all “Russians” are spies.
Sure, sure.  IDK of any other than Butina, but whatever.  Just remember, this spy is American raised and educated. It's disingenuous to call him a Ukrainian, but you know that. It's just a game you play.

You know the whole of the Soviet Union wasn’t Russia proper, right??   The guy had massive dealings in the region.

But all Russians are spies per you guys, so until further notice this guy is Russian spy/Disinformation agent.  Those are your rules.
I didn't say a single word about Russia. I just talked about the guy who moved away from the current Ukraine in 1975 as a toddler (and AFAIK hasn't lived there again), that you keep calling a Ukrainian.

He’s a Russian spy per LibBot rules, well, until a few hours ago anyway.
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: bucket on January 15, 2020, 10:17:26 PM
:lol:

She blocked Lutsenko and others ChumDummy.

I'm pretty sure only crazy people don't think Lutsenko wasn't corrupt as crap

Yes, only Lib preferred Ukrainians aren’t corrupt. 

Look at this guy, two weeks ago corrupt AF (and indicted) now 1000% telling the truth. Lol.

Ya, I think I was thinking of Shokin. My bad.
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: DaBigTrain on January 15, 2020, 10:18:49 PM
I'm pretty sure the Daxbot is about to explode.  It's called the same "2 weeks ago" method almost 10 times in the past 10 posts  :ohno:
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: sonofdaxjones on January 15, 2020, 10:20:12 PM
I'm pretty sure the Daxbot is about to explode.  It's called the same "2 weeks ago" method almost 10 times in the past 10 posts  :ohno:

Some people can’t follow timelines beyond a few minutes.  Case in point
Title: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: sonofdaxjones on January 15, 2020, 10:21:20 PM
:lol:

She blocked Lutsenko and others ChumDummy.

I'm pretty sure only crazy people don't think Lutsenko wasn't corrupt as crap

Yes, only Lib preferred Ukrainians aren’t corrupt. 

Look at this guy, two weeks ago corrupt AF (and indicted) now 1000% telling the truth. Lol.

Ya, I think I was thinking of Shokin. My bad.

Oh yeah, the guy that was retroactively and unilaterally declared “corrupt” by LibBots. 
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: DaBigTrain on January 15, 2020, 10:21:33 PM
I'm pretty sure the Daxbot is about to explode.  It's called the same "2 weeks ago" method almost 10 times in the past 10 posts  :ohno:

Some people can’t follow timelines beyond a few minutes.  Case in point

Or someone is confused about the last time he brought up the last provided talking point.  :frown:
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: sonofdaxjones on January 15, 2020, 10:23:54 PM
I'm pretty sure the Daxbot is about to explode.  It's called the same "2 weeks ago" method almost 10 times in the past 10 posts  :ohno:

Some people can’t follow timelines beyond a few minutes.  Case in point

Or someone is confused about the last time he brought up the last provided talking point.  :frown:

Or someone, as usual, just can’t remember that just a few weeks back this guy was declared corrupt by LibBots #frown (and indicted).
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: bucket on January 15, 2020, 10:24:06 PM
:lol:

She blocked Lutsenko and others ChumDummy.

I'm pretty sure only crazy people don't think Lutsenko wasn't corrupt as crap

Yes, only Lib preferred Ukrainians aren’t corrupt. 

Look at this guy, two weeks ago corrupt AF (and indicted) now 1000% telling the truth. Lol.

Ya, I think I was thinking of Shokin. My bad.

Oh yeah, the guy that was retroactively and unilaterally declared “corrupt” by LibBots.

Sane Republicans have too
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: sonofdaxjones on January 15, 2020, 10:27:48 PM
:lol:

She blocked Lutsenko and others ChumDummy.

I'm pretty sure only crazy people don't think Lutsenko wasn't corrupt as crap

Yes, only Lib preferred Ukrainians aren’t corrupt. 

Look at this guy, two weeks ago corrupt AF (and indicted) now 1000% telling the truth. Lol.

Ya, I think I was thinking of Shokin. My bad.

Oh yeah, the guy that was retroactively and unilaterally declared “corrupt” by LibBots.

Sane Republicans have too

Um hmm.   The allegations of Ukrainian corruption fly until the narrative is OrangeMan Bad, then believe every word.
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: bucket on January 15, 2020, 10:30:48 PM
Stay strong, bud. You'll get that sweet acquittal in a few weeks.
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: DaBigTrain on January 15, 2020, 10:32:36 PM
I'm pretty sure the Daxbot is about to explode.  It's called the same "2 weeks ago" method almost 10 times in the past 10 posts  :ohno:

Some people can’t follow timelines beyond a few minutes.  Case in point

Or someone is confused about the last time he brought up the last provided talking point.  :frown:

Or someone, as usual, just can’t remember that just a few weeks back this guy was declared corrupt by LibBots #frown (and indicted).

Wait a second...do you think I have still been talking about Lev?  L.O.L. if so.  Holy crap! Talk about being weeks behind the current topic  :frown:
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: sonofdaxjones on January 15, 2020, 10:33:53 PM
Stay strong, bud. You'll get that sweet acquittal in a few weeks.

Oh, don’t worry, they’ll be a 4th and a 5th and on and on attempt.

The cauldron of LibBot rage is a nuclear reactor.  All because mega corrupt Hillary didn’t get elected.  SMDH.
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: sonofdaxjones on January 15, 2020, 10:37:25 PM
I'm pretty sure the Daxbot is about to explode.  It's called the same "2 weeks ago" method almost 10 times in the past 10 posts  :ohno:

Some people can’t follow timelines beyond a few minutes.  Case in point

Or someone is confused about the last time he brought up the last provided talking point.  :frown:

Or someone, as usual, just can’t remember that just a few weeks back this guy was declared corrupt by LibBots #frown (and indicted).

Wait a second...do you think I have still been talking about Lev?  L.O.L. if so.  Holy crap! Talk about being weeks behind the current topic  :frown:

I’ve been using Lev as an example of how LOL desperate you guys are.  Again, just a few weeks ago he was a mega corrupt guy (and indicted) helping Rudy. Now he’s the agent of truth.

But LOL at you doin the ol “that’s not what I’m talkin about” shtick, my lawd you’re such a dumb ass,  Lol. 
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: DaBigTrain on January 15, 2020, 10:44:16 PM
I'm pretty sure the Daxbot is about to explode.  It's called the same "2 weeks ago" method almost 10 times in the past 10 posts  :ohno:

Some people can’t follow timelines beyond a few minutes.  Case in point

Or someone is confused about the last time he brought up the last provided talking point.  :frown:

Or someone, as usual, just can’t remember that just a few weeks back this guy was declared corrupt by LibBots #frown (and indicted).

Wait a second...do you think I have still been talking about Lev?  L.O.L. if so.  Holy crap! Talk about being weeks behind the current topic  :frown:

I’ve been using Lev as an example of how LOL desperate you guys are.  Again, just a few weeks ago he was a mega corrupt guy (and indicted) helping Rudy. Now he’s the agent of truth.

But LOL at you doin the ol “that’s not what I’m talkin about” shtick, my lawd you’re such a dumb ass,  Lol.

Bud, I've been talking about Rudy explicitly since you replied to the below thread, in pretty obvious fashion.  Yikes on the comprehension indicator.

https://goEMAW.com/forum/index.php?topic=41775.msg1951753#msg1951753
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: sonofdaxjones on January 15, 2020, 10:50:55 PM
I'm pretty sure the Daxbot is about to explode.  It's called the same "2 weeks ago" method almost 10 times in the past 10 posts  :ohno:

Some people can’t follow timelines beyond a few minutes.  Case in point

Or someone is confused about the last time he brought up the last provided talking point.  :frown:

Or someone, as usual, just can’t remember that just a few weeks back this guy was declared corrupt by LibBots #frown (and indicted).

Wait a second...do you think I have still been talking about Lev?  L.O.L. if so.  Holy crap! Talk about being weeks behind the current topic  :frown:

I’ve been using Lev as an example of how LOL desperate you guys are.  Again, just a few weeks ago he was a mega corrupt guy (and indicted) helping Rudy. Now he’s the agent of truth.

But LOL at you doin the ol “that’s not what I’m talkin about” shtick, my lawd you’re such a dumb ass,  Lol.

Bud, I've been talking about Rudy explicitly since you replied to the below thread, in pretty obvious fashion.  Yikes on the comprehension indicator.

https://goEMAW.com/forum/index.php?topic=41775.msg1951753#msg1951753

LOL, and for the 100th time, you guys were saying this corrupt Ukranian was not to be believed because he was working with Rudy . .  now he's a Ukrainian (Russian) American just trying to get the truth out there.

Try to keep up here, for once.

Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: DaBigTrain on January 15, 2020, 10:52:49 PM
I'm pretty sure the Daxbot is about to explode.  It's called the same "2 weeks ago" method almost 10 times in the past 10 posts  :ohno:

Some people can’t follow timelines beyond a few minutes.  Case in point

Or someone is confused about the last time he brought up the last provided talking point.  :frown:

Or someone, as usual, just can’t remember that just a few weeks back this guy was declared corrupt by LibBots #frown (and indicted).

Wait a second...do you think I have still been talking about Lev?  L.O.L. if so.  Holy crap! Talk about being weeks behind the current topic  :frown:

I’ve been using Lev as an example of how LOL desperate you guys are.  Again, just a few weeks ago he was a mega corrupt guy (and indicted) helping Rudy. Now he’s the agent of truth.

But LOL at you doin the ol “that’s not what I’m talkin about” shtick, my lawd you’re such a dumb ass,  Lol.

Bud, I've been talking about Rudy explicitly since you replied to the below thread, in pretty obvious fashion.  Yikes on the comprehension indicator.

https://goEMAW.com/forum/index.php?topic=41775.msg1951753#msg1951753

LOL, and for the 100th time, you guys were saying this corrupt Ukranian was not to be believed because he was working with Rudy . .  now he's a Ukrainian (Russian) American just trying to get the truth out there.

Try to keep up here, for once.

Umm...  Ok, Dax.  I'm sorry this is so hard, but I guess it's expected.
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: sonofdaxjones on January 15, 2020, 10:55:11 PM
I'm pretty sure the Daxbot is about to explode.  It's called the same "2 weeks ago" method almost 10 times in the past 10 posts  :ohno:

Some people can’t follow timelines beyond a few minutes.  Case in point

Or someone is confused about the last time he brought up the last provided talking point.  :frown:

Or someone, as usual, just can’t remember that just a few weeks back this guy was declared corrupt by LibBots #frown (and indicted).

Wait a second...do you think I have still been talking about Lev?  L.O.L. if so.  Holy crap! Talk about being weeks behind the current topic  :frown:

I’ve been using Lev as an example of how LOL desperate you guys are.  Again, just a few weeks ago he was a mega corrupt guy (and indicted) helping Rudy. Now he’s the agent of truth.

But LOL at you doin the ol “that’s not what I’m talkin about” shtick, my lawd you’re such a dumb ass,  Lol.

Bud, I've been talking about Rudy explicitly since you replied to the below thread, in pretty obvious fashion.  Yikes on the comprehension indicator.

https://goEMAW.com/forum/index.php?topic=41775.msg1951753#msg1951753

LOL, and for the 100th time, you guys were saying this corrupt Ukranian was not to be believed because he was working with Rudy . .  now he's a Ukrainian (Russian) American just trying to get the truth out there.

Try to keep up here, for once.

Umm...  Ok, Dax.  I'm sorry this is so hard, but I guess it's expected.

There's that Da Big Dummy go to when he just can't follow along, which is all the time.

Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: DaBigTrain on January 15, 2020, 10:59:28 PM
I'm pretty sure the Daxbot is about to explode.  It's called the same "2 weeks ago" method almost 10 times in the past 10 posts  :ohno:

Some people can’t follow timelines beyond a few minutes.  Case in point

Or someone is confused about the last time he brought up the last provided talking point.  :frown:

Or someone, as usual, just can’t remember that just a few weeks back this guy was declared corrupt by LibBots #frown (and indicted).

Wait a second...do you think I have still been talking about Lev?  L.O.L. if so.  Holy crap! Talk about being weeks behind the current topic  :frown:

I’ve been using Lev as an example of how LOL desperate you guys are.  Again, just a few weeks ago he was a mega corrupt guy (and indicted) helping Rudy. Now he’s the agent of truth.

But LOL at you doin the ol “that’s not what I’m talkin about” shtick, my lawd you’re such a dumb ass,  Lol.

Bud, I've been talking about Rudy explicitly since you replied to the below thread, in pretty obvious fashion.  Yikes on the comprehension indicator.

https://goEMAW.com/forum/index.php?topic=41775.msg1951753#msg1951753

LOL, and for the 100th time, you guys were saying this corrupt Ukranian was not to be believed because he was working with Rudy . .  now he's a Ukrainian (Russian) American just trying to get the truth out there.

Try to keep up here, for once.

Umm...  Ok, Dax.  I'm sorry this is so hard, but I guess it's expected.

There's that Da Big Dummy go to when he just can't follow along, which is all the time.

If only you could observe your posting from an outside unbiased party. I mean, I have nothing because I have explained this as clear as day, and you just don't get it.   :frown:  :lol:
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: sonofdaxjones on January 15, 2020, 11:09:14 PM
I'm pretty sure the Daxbot is about to explode.  It's called the same "2 weeks ago" method almost 10 times in the past 10 posts  :ohno:

Some people can’t follow timelines beyond a few minutes.  Case in point

Or someone is confused about the last time he brought up the last provided talking point.  :frown:

Or someone, as usual, just can’t remember that just a few weeks back this guy was declared corrupt by LibBots #frown (and indicted).

Wait a second...do you think I have still been talking about Lev?  L.O.L. if so.  Holy crap! Talk about being weeks behind the current topic  :frown:

I’ve been using Lev as an example of how LOL desperate you guys are.  Again, just a few weeks ago he was a mega corrupt guy (and indicted) helping Rudy. Now he’s the agent of truth.

But LOL at you doin the ol “that’s not what I’m talkin about” shtick, my lawd you’re such a dumb ass,  Lol.

Bud, I've been talking about Rudy explicitly since you replied to the below thread, in pretty obvious fashion.  Yikes on the comprehension indicator.

https://goEMAW.com/forum/index.php?topic=41775.msg1951753#msg1951753

LOL, and for the 100th time, you guys were saying this corrupt Ukranian was not to be believed because he was working with Rudy . .  now he's a Ukrainian (Russian) American just trying to get the truth out there.

Try to keep up here, for once.

Umm...  Ok, Dax.  I'm sorry this is so hard, but I guess it's expected.

There's that Da Big Dummy go to when he just can't follow along, which is all the time.

If only you could observe your posting from an outside unbiased party. I mean, I have nothing because I have explained this as clear as day, and you just don't get it.   :frown:  :lol:

If only you could understand that your attempt to make Captain Obvious points is superficial, but Da Big Dummy is gonna Da Big Dummy.   You quite literally implied that Rudy is corrupt, and "sold out" his country, when you guys now believe every word out of the mouth from a guy who was essentially locked at the hip with the "corrupt" "sell out".    :lol:  I'm sorry  you're too stupid to follow along and understand that . . . but I'm always here to explain things for you Da Big Dummy.

Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: Cire on January 16, 2020, 06:35:57 AM
Lmao

The talking point is

All the grifters, criminals, felons, and monsters that I am bff with and do all my business all the time with just aren’t being truthful about the dear leader.




Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: sonofdaxjones on January 16, 2020, 07:32:51 AM
Lmao

The talking point is

All the grifters, criminals, felons, and monsters that I am bff with and do all my business all the time with just aren’t being truthful about the dear leader.




Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

LOL, The talking point is that until last night this guy was a mega corrupt henchman for Rudy and the gang and can’t be believed. 

Now he’s the pinnacle of truth and justice because he went on Rachel “new Alex Jones” Maddow’s show and spun a fantastic OrangeMan bad tale (as he and his wife face more Federal charges). 



Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: Spracne on January 16, 2020, 07:35:59 AM
Dax getting all up in dat Parnas
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: sonofdaxjones on January 16, 2020, 07:44:25 AM
Of course Yova claimed she wasn’t blocking Visa’s and that the unilaterally declared bad Ukrainians are lying (while the unilaterally declared good Ukrainians are telling the truth) about the visa issue. 

Remembering that this is the same person coached to refer all inquiries about the Biden’s in the Ukraine to Biden’s office. 
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: chum1 on January 16, 2020, 07:49:23 AM
Of course Yova claimed she wasn’t blocking Visa’s and that the unilaterally declared bad Ukrainians are lying (while the unilaterally declared good Ukrainians are telling the truth) about the visa issue. 

Remembering that this is the same person coached to refer all inquiries about the Biden’s in the Ukraine to Biden’s office.

When you put it that way, I can definitely see how this whole impeachment thing is ultimately just a hoax.
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: Cire on January 16, 2020, 07:57:33 AM
Lmao

The talking point is

All the grifters, criminals, felons, and monsters that I am bff with and do all my business all the time with just aren’t being truthful about the dear leader.




Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

LOL, The talking point is that until last night this guy was a mega corrupt henchman for Rudy and the gang and can’t be believed. 

Now he’s the pinnacle of truth and justice because he went on Rachel “new Alex Jones” Maddow’s show and spun a fantastic OrangeMan bad tale (as he and his wife face more Federal charges). 





link?
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: Cire on January 16, 2020, 07:59:43 AM
I mean, from my news watching parnas was funneling money back and forth and setting up meetings between the trump gang and the Ukrainians.  Essentially the back channel guy.

And he just went public with all his stuff and he's got a lot, A LOT of receipts.
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: sonofdaxjones on January 16, 2020, 08:01:34 AM
Of course Yova claimed she wasn’t blocking Visa’s and that the unilaterally declared bad Ukrainians are lying (while the unilaterally declared good Ukrainians are telling the truth) about the visa issue. 

Remembering that this is the same person coached to refer all inquiries about the Biden’s in the Ukraine to Biden’s office.

When you put it that way, I can definitely see how this whole impeachment thing is ultimately just a hoax.

I’ll note the usual tap out.

I’m just looking forward to another day of As The Ukrainian(s) Turn.  In order for LibBots to tell us which once corrupt Ukrainian is now the embodiment of truth and virtue and which Ukrainians are still huge liars. 

You guys protect your own. 

Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: sonofdaxjones on January 16, 2020, 08:04:28 AM
I mean, from my news watching parnas was funneling money back and forth and setting up meetings between the trump gang and the Ukrainians.  Essentially the back channel guy.

And he just went public with all his stuff and he's got a lot, A LOT of receipts.

Good, they needed a back channel to get around the Obama hold out trying to block investigations into Dem (that would be FVPOTUS corruption) corruption.   

Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: Cire on January 16, 2020, 08:11:16 AM
Impeach Obama then

Evidence?  Witnesses?
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: sonofdaxjones on January 16, 2020, 08:16:53 AM
Impeach Obama then

Evidence?  Witnesses?

Oh no, in the case of blocked visas the bad Ukrainians (for today anyway) said she blocked visas so (for today) they’re liars.   It’s also pretty well known about the coaching she received to refer all inquiries about the Bidens in the Ukraine to his office.

Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: chum1 on January 16, 2020, 08:21:43 AM
I think I probably said this in the Russia thread, but it's amazing how a guy like dax who loves the crap out of discussing batshit conspiracy theories has zero interest in discussing ACTUAL conspiracies. No interest at all! None!
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: sonofdaxjones on January 16, 2020, 08:32:25 AM
I think I probably said this in the Russia thread, but it's amazing how a guy like dax who loves the crap out of discussing batshit conspiracy theories has zero interest in discussing ACTUAL conspiracies. No interest at all! None!

The problem you have is that LibBots are constantly labeling conspiracies.   There’s nothing “bat crap” about one group of Ukrainians claiming the former Ambassador blocked visas of Ukrainians trying to meet with US officials.  There’s nothing “bat crap” about the former Ukrainian leadership trying to suck up to Trump after he was elected because the Trump people knew they were helping the Clinton campaign and trying to get her elected.

There’s nothing bat crap about Joe Biden holding aid money hostage.  He admitted it.  Etc etc etc

Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: chum1 on January 16, 2020, 08:33:00 AM
Oh, man. Lol.

https://twitter.com/svdate/status/1217810946162339840
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: sonofdaxjones on January 16, 2020, 08:40:05 AM
Oh, man. Lol.

https://twitter.com/svdate/status/1217810946162339840


If the no longer corrupt Ukrainian-American (formerly very corrupt) makes the allegation it must be investigated. Lol.
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: Rage Against the McKee on January 16, 2020, 08:42:34 AM
 :lol:
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: star seed 7 on January 16, 2020, 08:48:26 AM
I think I probably said this in the Russia thread, but it's amazing how a guy like dax who loves the crap out of discussing batshit conspiracy theories has zero interest in discussing ACTUAL conspiracies. No interest at all! None!

It's fascinating.

9/11 is an inside job? Uh duh!

Trump tried to use a bunch of idiots and extortion to get Ukraine to do a sham investigation on a political rival? Well that just doesn't add up.
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: Phil Titola on January 16, 2020, 08:50:13 AM
No way these guys should be trusted just on their word. Aren't they handing over you know, actual evidence ?
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: Cire on January 16, 2020, 08:54:30 AM
No way these guys should be trusted just on their word. Aren't they handing over you know, actual evidence ?

Gigabytes of it
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: star seed 7 on January 16, 2020, 08:56:00 AM
No way these guys should be trusted just on their word. Aren't they handing over you know, actual evidence ?

It was faked after Lev suffered the humiliation of Hillary's defeat. Any evidence is obviously manufactured
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: Cire on January 16, 2020, 08:56:17 AM
Impeach Obama then

Evidence?  Witnesses?

Oh no, in the case of blocked visas the bad Ukrainians (for today anyway) said she blocked visas so (for today) they’re liars.   It’s also pretty well known about the coaching she received to refer all inquiries about the Bidens in the Ukraine to his office.



If joe biden, yanokovich (sp?) et all did illegal then investigate and punish.

If only the DOJ wasn't controlled by the libs this would have happend by now!!#%@%!
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: steve dave on January 16, 2020, 09:05:50 AM
https://twitter.com/kyledcheney/status/1217821794217885697


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: star seed 7 on January 16, 2020, 09:08:10 AM
If the president does it, it's not illegal - dax's favorite president until trump
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: sonofdaxjones on January 16, 2020, 09:12:43 AM
Got a link on that Lib?

You stood by and let your guy destroy entire countries with no approval from any other congressional body at all.   Nor any explanation as to why.   

Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: star seed 7 on January 16, 2020, 09:14:12 AM
Got a link on that Lib?

You stood by and let your guy destroy entire countries with no approval from any other congressional body at all.   Nor any explanation as to why.

[youtube]https://youtu.be/dMt8qCl5fPk[/youtube]
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: LickNeckey on January 16, 2020, 09:14:36 AM
GO DAX GO!!!
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: sonofdaxjones on January 16, 2020, 09:15:00 AM
Got a link on that Lib?

You stood by and let your guy destroy entire countries with no approval from any other congressional body at all.   Nor any explanation as to why.

[youtube]https://youtu.be/dMt8qCl5fPk[/youtube]
I’m talking about me supporting that, dumbass. 
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: Cire on January 16, 2020, 09:24:29 AM
BUT LIBYA
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: Phil Titola on January 16, 2020, 09:27:25 AM
 :'bye cruel world:
Title: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: sonofdaxjones on January 16, 2020, 09:30:27 AM
BUT LIBYA

In the context of a president can do whatever he/she wants, it’s perfectly applicable.  Lib only gets mad if a Pub does it, while most get mad if any do it.
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: catastrophe on January 16, 2020, 09:31:13 AM
Dax you were def on board with withholding aid if that’s what you’re asking.
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: steve dave on January 16, 2020, 09:34:09 AM
https://twitter.com/nyinla2121/status/1217617749322522625


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: sonofdaxjones on January 16, 2020, 09:40:25 AM
Dax you were def on board with withholding aid if that’s what you’re asking.

The US has repeatedly demanded something in return for aid over the decades.  For example Joe Biden demanded that the Ukraine do something before he would release the aid.  Just in this case, it was to protect his families corruption.

Otherwise the US has historically quid pro quo’d almost all forms of aid. 

Now apparently Libs want no questions asked, outcomes sought or behaviors changed foreign aid. Sad

Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: catastrophe on January 16, 2020, 09:41:59 AM
Delete your post, read the OMB decision, and try again. What you are saying is ok is not even close to what actually happened here.
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: LickNeckey on January 16, 2020, 09:42:12 AM
BUT LIBYA

In the context of a president can do whatever he/she wants, it’s perfectly applicable.  Lib only gets mad if a Pub does it, while most get mad if any do it.

after 8 years of "DOES OBAMA THINK HE IS A KING" it is interesting to hear pubs extoll the virtues of expansive executive power
Title: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: sonofdaxjones on January 16, 2020, 09:46:02 AM
BUT LIBYA

In the context of a president can do whatever he/she wants, it’s perfectly applicable.  Lib only gets mad if a Pub does it, while most get mad if any do it.

after 8 years of "DOES OBAMA THINK HE IS A KING" it is interesting to hear pubs extoll the virtues of expansive executive power

There’s only a modicum of executive power in wanting to investigate corruption. 

Everything Trump has done to date almost exclusively falls into the full purview and jurisdiction of the executive branch.  You guys just don’t like it because it’s Trump.

When Trump gins up something with a couple of NATO allies to go topple a regime, get back to me. 
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: LickNeckey on January 16, 2020, 09:53:39 AM
the guy has openly suggested personally and through his campaign that he should serve beyond term limits

not a big deal but the conservative outrage had Obama even joked about it would have been insane



"Everyone is familiar with William Blackstone’s famous aphorism, “That the king can do no wrong, is a necessary and fundamental principle of the English constitution.” But what does that have to do with us on this side of the Atlantic — we who revolted against a “God-King” with the words “all men are created equal,” broke free, and created a constitutional republic?

As it turns out, precious little. In 1996, Supreme Court Justice John Paul Stevens wrote that sovereign immunity is a judge-made doctrine that has been “thoroughly discredited” because it is founded on the notion “that a divinely ordained monarch ‘can do no wrong.’ ” Not surprisingly, “Sovereign immunity is a right that cannot be found in the text or the framers’ intent,” wrote recognized legal scholar Erwin Chemerinsky."
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: sonofdaxjones on January 16, 2020, 10:02:47 AM
the guy has openly suggested personally and through his campaign that he should serve beyond term limits

not a big deal but the conservative outrage had Obama even joked about it would have been insane



"Everyone is familiar with William Blackstone’s famous aphorism, “That the king can do no wrong, is a necessary and fundamental principle of the English constitution.” But what does that have to do with us on this side of the Atlantic — we who revolted against a “God-King” with the words “all men are created equal,” broke free, and created a constitutional republic?

As it turns out, precious little. In 1996, Supreme Court Justice John Paul Stevens wrote that sovereign immunity is a judge-made doctrine that has been “thoroughly discredited” because it is founded on the notion “that a divinely ordained monarch ‘can do no wrong.’ ” Not surprisingly, “Sovereign immunity is a right that cannot be found in the text or the framers’ intent,” wrote recognized legal scholar Erwin Chemerinsky."

First of all, LOL, because I’m not all supporting unlimited presidential powers and I don’t need any lectures on sovereign immunity.

Next, your guy openly lamented term limits, and LOL at the notion he was joking. 

So again, when Trump makes a couple of phone calls to 10 Downing and a few days later “NATO” is toppling a regime in North Africa, we’ll talk. 
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: LickNeckey on January 16, 2020, 10:19:14 AM
Dax you were def on board with withholding aid if that’s what you’re asking.

The US has repeatedly demanded something in return for aid over the decades.  For example Joe Biden demanded that the Ukraine do something before he would release the aid.  Just in this case, it was to protect his families corruption.

Otherwise the US has historically quid pro quo’d almost all forms of aid. 

Now apparently Libs want no questions asked, outcomes sought or behaviors changed foreign aid. Sad

everyone knows that the executive branch has the power of the purse

Title: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: sonofdaxjones on January 16, 2020, 10:30:34 AM
Dax you were def on board with withholding aid if that’s what you’re asking.

The US has repeatedly demanded something in return for aid over the decades.  For example Joe Biden demanded that the Ukraine do something before he would release the aid.  Just in this case, it was to protect his families corruption.

Otherwise the US has historically quid pro quo’d almost all forms of aid. 

Now apparently Libs want no questions asked, outcomes sought or behaviors changed foreign aid. Sad

everyone knows that the executive branch has the power of the purse

Everyone knows the legislative branch controls all foreign affairs and the executive branch doesn’t have broad remedies on how allocated foreign aid is spent. 
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: LickNeckey on January 16, 2020, 10:38:39 AM
it seems that the GAO knows this
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: sonofdaxjones on January 16, 2020, 10:42:39 AM
it seems that the GAO knows this

The GAO certainly offers a valid opinion in which to consider, but that doesn’t change the fact that the executive branch has broad remedies as to the spending of allocated foreign aid.

Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: Cire on January 16, 2020, 11:33:43 AM
BUT LIBYA

In the context of a president can do whatever he/she wants, it’s perfectly applicable.  Lib only gets mad if a Pub does it, while most get mad if any do it.

name names dax
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: LickNeckey on January 16, 2020, 11:36:24 AM
"Faithful execution of the law does not permit the President to substitute his own policy priorities for those that Congress has enacted into law," the opinion said. "[The Office of Management and Budget] OMB withheld funds for a policy reason ... not a programmatic delay. Therefore, we conclude that the OMB violated the ICA [Impoundment Control Act]."
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: sonofdaxjones on January 16, 2020, 11:41:50 AM
"Faithful execution of the law does not permit the President to substitute his own policy priorities for those that Congress has enacted into law," the opinion said. "[The Office of Management and Budget] OMB withheld funds for a policy reason ... not a programmatic delay. Therefore, we conclude that the OMB violated the ICA [Impoundment Control Act]."

What is spent is not impounded.
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: LickNeckey on January 16, 2020, 11:56:39 AM
"The President has narrow, limited authority to withhold appropriations under the Impoundment Control Act of 1974, OMB told GAO that it withheld the funds to ensure that they were not spent 'in a manner that could conflict with the President’s foreign policy.' The law does not permit OMB to withhold funds for policy reasons."
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: sonofdaxjones on January 16, 2020, 12:08:35 PM
"The President has narrow, limited authority to withhold appropriations under the Impoundment Control Act of 1974, OMB told GAO that it withheld the funds to ensure that they were not spent 'in a manner that could conflict with the President’s foreign policy.' The law does not permit OMB to withhold funds for policy reasons."

Lick I’ve read a ton congressional testimony, and the articles from the wonks who say the president was in the wrong. It all reads like typical wonk we’ve got money we’ve got to spend it BS.  Because not spending it would be worse than spending it. On top of only providing at best lip service to the corruption in Ukraine.  These are career go along to get along types.

While doing what Trump did may have been bullshit, to be wholly dismissive of the corruption component, particularly in a place like the Ukraine is also bullshit.   There’s even people glomming all over the anti-corruption pledge of the new Ukrainian administration.  Lol, it will take  decades to root that out.   I read these articles and it’s clear these policy lifers have rubber stamped billions into corrupt shitholes because nothing builds the old resume like “in charge of (insert aid program here) program for Office of blah blah blah”.   

Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: DaBigTrain on January 16, 2020, 12:10:09 PM
Nothing Dax will not defend Trump on. Nothing.
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: chum1 on January 16, 2020, 12:12:04 PM
Lick I’ve read a ton congressional testimony

 :love:

I didn't read the rest. Fully satisfied.
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: star seed 7 on January 16, 2020, 12:14:56 PM
 :D
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: sonofdaxjones on January 16, 2020, 12:21:23 PM
Theres nothing perpetually enraged LibBot Nation won’t melt down about and there’s literally no one they won’t support, believe or agree with if they’re OrangeMan Bad. 

SMDH
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: chum1 on January 16, 2020, 12:24:51 PM
https://twitter.com/dsamuelsohn/status/1217843762644357120
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: sonofdaxjones on January 16, 2020, 12:25:50 PM
Guys it’s not my fault you can only understand Twitter. T&P’s
Title: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: sonofdaxjones on January 16, 2020, 12:26:57 PM
https://twitter.com/dsamuelsohn/status/1217843762644357120

Implicated by a guy who is being indicted and likely prosecuted by Barr. 

Good ol Slurs.
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: Cire on January 16, 2020, 12:33:57 PM
Not understanding twitter or thinking that twitter is the source of news/et al is VERY MAGA
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: steve dave on January 16, 2020, 12:41:16 PM
Not understanding twitter or thinking that twitter is the source of news/et al is VERY MAGA

It enrages them


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: Dugout DickStone on January 16, 2020, 12:51:15 PM
Not understanding twitter or thinking that twitter is the source of news/et al is VERY MAGA

It enrages them


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

scares tf out of them too
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: chum1 on January 16, 2020, 01:02:18 PM
More Lev!

https://twitter.com/josephabondy/status/1217851489537941505
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: Spracne on January 16, 2020, 01:03:13 PM
He screams "just happy to be there" to me.
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: chum1 on January 16, 2020, 01:06:36 PM
He should absolutely enjoy his freedom while he still can.
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: sonofdaxjones on January 16, 2020, 01:12:29 PM
Not understanding twitter or thinking that twitter is the source of news/et al is VERY MAGA

It enrages them


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

scares tf out of them too

Nothing makes the typical LibBot more angry than the realization that their depth of knowledge is derived solely from Twitter.

SMDH as an avid Twitter user
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: Cire on January 16, 2020, 01:34:45 PM
Dax that makes it look like you have no idea how twitter works
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: sonofdaxjones on January 16, 2020, 01:38:13 PM
Dax that makes it look like you have no idea how twitter works

Next you’ll try and tell me you/they actually read any linked articles.
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: Cire on January 16, 2020, 02:50:01 PM
I mean, I read the news.  So yes?
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: Cire on January 16, 2020, 02:52:50 PM
https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/1217909231946477575?s=20
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: chum1 on January 16, 2020, 03:49:36 PM
I'm amazed by their continual creativity.

https://twitter.com/StevenTDennis/status/1217881508674928641
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: chum1 on January 17, 2020, 08:26:14 AM
This cover-up effort is something.

https://twitter.com/emptywheel/status/1218148419891494918
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: sonofdaxjones on January 17, 2020, 08:36:55 AM
Geez Chum, where do you find these websites?  (echo echo echo)

Empty Wheel  :lol: :lol: :lol:
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: chum1 on January 17, 2020, 08:49:37 AM
Geez Chum, where do you find these websites?

That one, probably Lawfare. George Conway and other stupid idiots also retweet her stuff.
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: sonofdaxjones on January 17, 2020, 09:14:11 AM
Geez Chum, where do you find these websites?

That one, probably Lawfare. George Conway and other stupid idiots also retweet her stuff.

George Conway isn't dumb, he's just extremely jealous of his wife and still mad that he's not in the West Wing.   #truthbomb
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: chum1 on January 17, 2020, 09:15:33 AM
https://twitter.com/maggieNYT/status/1218182146982055937
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: Phil Titola on January 17, 2020, 09:26:30 AM
So fox news has really just been a 3 year interview for an impeachment job? 
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: chum1 on January 17, 2020, 09:36:16 AM
Hell yeah.
 :)

Quote
But Trump thinks Dershowitz is magnificent on TV, a White House official told me.

https://twitter.com/jonathanvswan/status/1218193692609142785
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: catastrophe on January 17, 2020, 10:32:53 AM
OJ, Epstein, and Trump
Title: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: steve dave on January 17, 2020, 10:57:22 AM
Holy crap, yes for Dershowitz!


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: Brock Landers on January 17, 2020, 12:42:31 PM
Please please add Rudy.   :pray:
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: steve dave on January 17, 2020, 02:42:02 PM
Man, this is going to be a ride


https://twitter.com/aaronblake/status/1218267518936264704


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: DaBigTrain on January 17, 2020, 02:44:57 PM
Only the best
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: sonofdaxjones on January 17, 2020, 02:53:02 PM
Awesome.

Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: steve dave on January 17, 2020, 03:49:27 PM
https://twitter.com/bungdan/status/1218196571591852033
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: sonofdaxjones on January 17, 2020, 03:53:44 PM
Dan Murphy
@bungdan
Covered wars big and small, military dictatorships, and failed states for 22yrs from 3 continents. Please don't make me come out of retirement.

Very busy guy from 2009 to 2016
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: chum1 on January 17, 2020, 07:32:41 PM
https://twitter.com/mkraju/status/1218325726602067974
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: MakeItRain on January 17, 2020, 07:47:10 PM
So I fell four pages behind in this thread in one day, is it essentially four pages of dax flopping around like a fish on asphalt?
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: catastrophe on January 17, 2020, 08:30:23 PM
My favorites are when Dax says something hasn’t been proven against Trump yet, but then  when you ask if it would be bad if they were proven he doesn’t really say.
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: Dugout DickStone on January 17, 2020, 08:48:40 PM
Most trumpers dive in the shallow end head first on everything.  Dax has learned to wait, hedge because trump is likely to reverse and Dax has been made a fool of too many times when that happens.  Like putting a big dumb hand on a stove.  Eventually that hand can't be that dumb
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: steve dave on January 18, 2020, 06:26:14 AM
https://twitter.com/adamgoldmanNYT/status/1218509666231169025
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: steve dave on January 18, 2020, 07:23:11 AM
https://twitter.com/josephabondy/status/1218202451540692992
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: sonofdaxjones on January 18, 2020, 08:37:07 AM
Lol, keep trying guys.
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: sonofdaxjones on January 18, 2020, 08:47:53 AM
https://twitter.com/adamgoldmanNYT/status/1218509666231169025

Good.   But you know in your dumb little heads that if “I’m afraid of Bob Barr” hadn’t gone on Rachel “new Alex Jones” Maddow’s show and made those allegations.  Any information dug up on the Biden’s or claims about the Biden’s made by this guy would have been immediately dismissed as a Russian conspiracy or Russian disinformation. 

But now, just a great American seeking truth and justice . . . and being indicted by Bob Barr. 

We all know, well you guys don’t, but the rest of us know why Barr is under attack from Slurs “this is a solemn occasion, here have a pen” Pelosi on down.   



Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: DaBigTrain on January 18, 2020, 10:44:17 AM
Oh Dax :lol:
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: sonofdaxjones on January 18, 2020, 10:53:45 AM
Oh Dax :lol:

Da Big Dummy has nothing as usual. 

Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: Phil Titola on January 18, 2020, 03:59:59 PM
I want everything the Bidens did as exposed as what we are seeing Trump et. al. did (which is a lot and very dumbly done)  Why wouldn't we?
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: steve dave on January 19, 2020, 10:47:25 AM
https://twitter.com/paleofuture/status/1218904084612182016


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: DaBigTrain on January 19, 2020, 11:29:22 AM
He’s a perfect fit on the Trump team.
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: sys on January 20, 2020, 03:16:10 AM
https://twitter.com/PlanMaestro/status/1218931648294739969
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: chum1 on January 20, 2020, 05:41:13 PM
https://twitter.com/rossgarber/status/1219393993664057344
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: SkinnyBenny on January 20, 2020, 06:12:19 PM
https://twitter.com/adamgoldmanNYT/status/1218509666231169025

Good.   But you know in your dumb little heads that if “I’m afraid of Bob Barr” hadn’t gone on Rachel “new Alex Jones” Maddow’s show and made those allegations.  Any information dug up on the Biden’s or claims about the Biden’s made by this guy would have been immediately dismissed as a Russian conspiracy or Russian disinformation. 

But now, just a great American seeking truth and justice . . . and being indicted by Bob Barr. 

We all know, well you guys don’t, but the rest of us know why Barr is under attack from Slurs “this is a solemn occasion, here have a pen” Pelosi on down.   

Who’s Bob Barr?
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: Institutional Control on January 20, 2020, 07:58:33 PM
https://twitter.com/fran_chambers/status/1219428926851833859?s=21.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: chum1 on January 21, 2020, 11:52:15 AM
There's 1.

https://twitter.com/igorbobic/status/1219666430246969344
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: waks on January 21, 2020, 11:57:06 AM
https://twitter.com/adamgoldmanNYT/status/1218509666231169025

Good.   But you know in your dumb little heads that if “I’m afraid of Bob Barr” hadn’t gone on Rachel “new Alex Jones” Maddow’s show and made those allegations.  Any information dug up on the Biden’s or claims about the Biden’s made by this guy would have been immediately dismissed as a Russian conspiracy or Russian disinformation. 

But now, just a great American seeking truth and justice . . . and being indicted by Bob Barr. 

We all know, well you guys don’t, but the rest of us know why Barr is under attack from Slurs “this is a solemn occasion, here have a pen” Pelosi on down.   

Who’s Bob Barr?
I think he means AG William Barr and not former Congressman Bob Barr
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: chum1 on January 21, 2020, 01:48:42 PM
I'm no expert and am totally biased, but it seems like the President's lawyers are kinda shitty at this.
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: chum1 on January 21, 2020, 01:53:56 PM
Yeah, Cipollone throws out these soundbytes seemingly out of nowhere from time to time and it's lol. Maybe it's one of those things that you only understand if you watch Fox News.

https://twitter.com/lrozen/status/1219705860643065856
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: star seed 7 on January 21, 2020, 02:07:30 PM
I'm no expert and am totally biased, but it seems like the President's lawyers are kinda shitty at this.

https://twitter.com/SethAbramson/status/1219708322917638144
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: chum1 on January 21, 2020, 02:11:13 PM
Apparently, it's the Fox News thing.

https://twitter.com/Susan_Hennessey/status/1219705344089362433
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: chum1 on January 21, 2020, 03:15:54 PM
Also biased, but much more of an expert.

https://twitter.com/gtconway3d/status/1219728264379486213
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: chum1 on January 21, 2020, 04:46:34 PM
2

https://twitter.com/Phil_Mattingly/status/1219737806903435269
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: sonofdaxjones on January 21, 2020, 05:09:57 PM
The unilateral declarations of the left and jealous husbands has been fantastic today.

Very enjoyable.
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: Spracne on January 21, 2020, 05:10:49 PM
fwiw, I think Sekulow is a pretty good attorney.
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: chum1 on January 21, 2020, 07:41:07 PM
fwiw, I think Sekulow is a pretty good attorney.

He said "lawyer lawsuits" like five times and I didn't know what the eff he was talking about either. Figured it was one of those Fox News things.

https://twitter.com/amyklobuchar/status/1219792023269580800
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: star seed 7 on January 21, 2020, 08:57:11 PM
I have always associated him with stuff like this. It was absolutely no surprise when he joined up with a person like trump.

https://twitter.com/KFILE/status/1219778631993634816
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: catastrophe on January 22, 2020, 06:31:51 AM
fwiw, I think Sekulow is a pretty good attorney.

Didn’t you also think Giuliani was some sort of 4D chess player a little while back?
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: steve dave on January 22, 2020, 06:42:34 AM
Yeah, was not shocked when a guy who believes being homosexual should be a crime joined trumps legal team


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: chum1 on January 22, 2020, 08:40:49 AM
https://twitter.com/mkraju/status/1219961009600958465
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: Spracne on January 22, 2020, 01:19:58 PM
fwiw, I think Sekulow is a pretty good attorney.

Didn’t you also think Giuliani was some sort of 4D chess player a little while back?
Did I? If so, I was temporarily insane and not responsible for my actions.
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: chum1 on January 22, 2020, 02:24:51 PM
https://twitter.com/jonward11/status/1220077644429041665
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: steve dave on January 22, 2020, 05:02:44 PM
lmao


https://twitter.com/popehat/status/1220118860306604032


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: chum1 on January 23, 2020, 03:25:55 PM
https://twitter.com/ChrisMurphyCT/status/1220394487018676225
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: chum1 on January 23, 2020, 11:15:22 PM
https://twitter.com/mattmfm/status/1220555307916677120
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: sonofdaxjones on January 24, 2020, 07:52:32 AM
So confident in defeating Trump this fall and the clearest indication yet this process has nothing to do with the 2020 election.  Democrats (extremely paranoid, Russian under every rock Democrats) are already trying to delegitimize the 2020 election. 

Vlad Putin is glowing with pride about his useful idiots. 

#bloomberg2020
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: sonofdaxjones on January 24, 2020, 07:59:14 AM
https://twitter.com/mattmfm/status/1220555307916677120

LOL, hasn’t media been caught making stuff up enough lately?

Hey did ya hear some guy from CNN “overheard” two Republican Senators saying they only watch Fox News? 

He didn’t actually hear it, but it could have happened so just get it out there on the Twittisphere for a few hours so useful idiot LibBot Nation can chisel it into reality.   

Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: catastrophe on January 24, 2020, 08:33:46 AM
But if it happened, definitely bad or no?
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: star seed 7 on January 24, 2020, 08:36:04 AM
Yeah, that doesn't sound like something trump would do
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: sonofdaxjones on January 24, 2020, 08:36:58 AM
But if it happened, definitely bad or no?

I don’t get why such a thing was even (supposedly) said.  If he’s impeached what will it matter?
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: star seed 7 on January 24, 2020, 08:40:34 AM
Dax, do you know that a bunch of Republicans could vote to remove and it still wouldn't cross the threshold?
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: chum1 on January 24, 2020, 08:47:27 AM
There are also votes other than the impeachment vote. For example, the vote to vote on whether or not witnesses will be called.
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: Phil Titola on January 24, 2020, 08:52:09 AM
Witnesses in a trial? What is this, Soviet Russia?
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: chum1 on January 24, 2020, 10:21:48 AM
https://twitter.com/maggieNYT/status/1220741672742608896
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: Institutional Control on January 24, 2020, 10:55:08 AM
The Ambassador serves at the pleasure of the president - Dax


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: chum1 on January 24, 2020, 11:52:25 AM
Good question.

https://twitter.com/amandacarpenter/status/1220765104708505600
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: Phil Titola on January 24, 2020, 11:54:54 AM
Dax will go ballistic over this. Look how fixated he has been on the "post election flexibility" hot mic moment by another president.
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: Brock Landers on January 24, 2020, 11:58:56 AM
dax - Hey, "take her out" just means do it in a public setting just like when Bob Sugar fired Jerry Maguire.
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: star seed 7 on January 24, 2020, 11:59:49 AM
I know when I want to fire someone that I can pick up the phone and immediately fire, I'll usually put that person under surveillance and fabricate a smear campaign against them first.
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: wetwillie on January 24, 2020, 12:06:04 PM
does any one see a scenario in which Trump gets removed from office after this thing goes to a vote? It still feels highly unlikely to me however it feels the tide has turned maybe a little.
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: star seed 7 on January 24, 2020, 12:12:42 PM
Only if Bolton actually testifies and actually has some bombshell information, even then I think republican voters (so by extention republican senators) are OK with trump doing literally whatever he wants because they feel Hillary and Obama were literally demons.
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: Institutional Control on January 24, 2020, 12:13:54 PM
The only possible scenario is if they allow witnesses and one of them drops a huge bombshell. At this point, I don’t see them allowing witnesses or additional documents.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: sonofdaxjones on January 24, 2020, 12:36:15 PM
So Ambassadors don't serve at the pleasure of the President now?

When did this change happen?


“We were supposed to share this information during a working trip to the United States,” Kulyk told me in a wide-ranging interview. “However, the [U.S.] ambassador blocked us from obtaining a visa. She didn’t explicitly deny our visa, but also didn’t give it to us.”

https://thehill.com/opinion/white-house/437719-ukrainian-to-us-prosecutors-why-dont-you-want-our-evidence-on-democrats
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: star seed 7 on January 24, 2020, 12:49:32 PM
Apparently ambassadors are threatened, surveilled, and publicly smeared at the pleasure of the president as well. Just how Washington works.
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: sonofdaxjones on January 24, 2020, 12:57:55 PM
Apparently ambassadors are threatened, surveilled, and publicly smeared at the pleasure of the president as well. Just how Washington works.

I would expect nothing less than for you to believe every accusation (of the thousands) leveled by LibBots at this administration.    Hell, an outright fabricated lie about an "overheard" conversation was Tweeted around the universe just yesterday.

But ya know what's not made up about political spying?   LibBot Hero and known communist John Brennan and the CIA spying on Congress.  Or the NSA spying on journalists or the leaders of our NATO allies.   You LibBots fully supported surveillance nation just as long as it was your guy doing it.   

So it seems really weird you'd be mad about this alleged spying on the clearly very corrupt former U.S. ambassador to the Ukraine. 





Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: star seed 7 on January 24, 2020, 01:07:54 PM
The great daxover continues
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: sonofdaxjones on January 24, 2020, 01:13:15 PM
The great daxover continues

Any thoughts on why the (former) Ambassador was so corrupt or what she was covering up, Lib?
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: Brock Landers on January 24, 2020, 01:20:32 PM
omg they reeled dax in too   :lol:
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: sonofdaxjones on January 24, 2020, 01:22:27 PM
Why did she not grant the visa’s? Just seems weird for a political movement that advocates just showing up at the border and it’s all good.

They should have just hopped across the Rio Grande. 
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: star seed 7 on January 24, 2020, 01:24:08 PM
No doubt part of the vast left wing conspiracy to overturn the 2016 election and protect papa frontrunner Biden
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: sonofdaxjones on January 24, 2020, 01:29:36 PM
No doubt part of the vast left wing conspiracy to overturn the 2016 election and protect papa frontrunner Biden

Well, if there's any movement that can spot a vast winged conspiracy, it's the movement that was home to the greatest spotter of vast winged conspiracies in American political history.

Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: star seed 7 on January 24, 2020, 01:31:04 PM
The Epoch Times?
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: sonofdaxjones on January 24, 2020, 01:33:22 PM
The Epoch Times?

Tapout accepted
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: star seed 7 on January 24, 2020, 01:37:31 PM
Quote
I don't believe conspiracy theories, you believe conspiracy theories.

Anyway, I should get back to explaining how Obama orchestrated 9/11 from a marxist re-education camp in Kenya
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: sonofdaxjones on January 24, 2020, 01:42:00 PM
Lib, I can't help it that you won't acknowledge your hero and the greatest spotter of winged political conspiracies in our great nations history.

Sad

Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: Phil Titola on January 24, 2020, 02:10:25 PM
Dax calling out lies while he stands behind orange man like a sentry is my favorite irony.
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: sonofdaxjones on January 24, 2020, 04:14:33 PM
#bloomberg2020
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: wetwillie on January 24, 2020, 05:57:57 PM
If I’m Mike Pence I find a way to leak some damning crap to the right people.  He can snatch power for a fleeting moment.
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: bucket on January 24, 2020, 06:59:37 PM
https://twitter.com/EliStokols/status/1220869981069549569

He's guilty, but Republicans don't find seeking foreign influence on elections impeachable. Sad.
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: bucket on January 24, 2020, 07:31:56 PM
I don't think it's a big surprise that this is a contest of political power to the detriment of the US Constitution. It's being treated like toilet paper and I don't think there's much of a loss felt about it tbh

Ya, blows my mind. I guess that America thing wasn't that big of a deal afterall.
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: chum1 on January 25, 2020, 06:02:47 AM
https://twitter.com/Yamiche/status/1220859826793742336
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: chum1 on January 26, 2020, 09:53:15 AM
https://twitter.com/AC360/status/1221251673936551936
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: DaBigTrain on January 26, 2020, 09:55:28 AM
Nothing like the president very openly threatening a member of Congress.  This totalitarian state is exactly what gets Dax up in the morning.


https://twitter.com/realdonaldtrump/status/1221422761597394944
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: Brock Landers on January 26, 2020, 04:31:41 PM
Hell it's not even the first time he has threatened Schiff. 
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: Institutional Control on January 26, 2020, 05:08:12 PM
https://twitter.com/nytmike/status/1221568854809284610?s=21


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: star seed 7 on January 26, 2020, 05:51:37 PM
Duh
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: star seed 7 on January 26, 2020, 06:06:52 PM
https://twitter.com/TVietor08/status/1221574956820992000

Oh no crap?
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: chum1 on January 26, 2020, 07:52:38 PM
https://twitter.com/sahilkapur/status/1221598101640830985
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: steve dave on January 27, 2020, 08:34:44 AM
Dax, do you think the Senate should have John Bolton testify?
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: chum1 on January 27, 2020, 08:39:49 AM
lol

https://twitter.com/maggieNYT/status/1221789190725283840
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: bucket on January 27, 2020, 08:52:59 AM
lol

https://twitter.com/maggieNYT/status/1221789190725283840

(https://media1.tenor.com/images/79cf6bef1b58d93a9df8b50cae6e7bff/tenor.gif)
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: catastrophe on January 27, 2020, 08:59:52 AM
Imagine thinking your party was cruising to an easy impeachment trial win and then having to figure out how to deal with this story that is basically the same as the like 14 others who testified under oath.

Not sure how the GOP will be able to circle the wagons here.
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: bucket on January 27, 2020, 09:02:03 AM
Imagine thinking your party was cruising to an easy impeachment trial win and then having to figure out how to deal with this story that is basically the same as the like 14 others who testified under oath.

Not sure how the GOP will be able to circle the wagons here.

https://twitter.com/RepMarkMeadows/status/1221626725257424896
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: Brock Landers on January 27, 2020, 09:14:49 AM
Imagine thinking your party was cruising to an easy impeachment trial win and then having to figure out how to deal with this story that is basically the same as the like 14 others who testified under oath.

Not sure how the GOP will be able to circle the wagons here.

(https://thumbs.gfycat.com/FaithfulVigilantHermitcrab-small.gif)
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: chum1 on January 27, 2020, 09:23:14 AM
I don't doubt their resolve to do it at all. But, man, the cost of making the trial look like a cover-up just keeps getting higher and higher. And they have to be wary about the likelihood of additional damning info coming out in the future.
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: chum1 on January 27, 2020, 09:25:29 AM
But it's hilarious that they were like, "sure, we'll just rush through the trial because Trump's got the cover-up completely under control. We'll be golden because HE'S GOT THIS!"
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: star seed 7 on January 27, 2020, 09:36:44 AM
You'd think republicans in congress would be weary of believing anything trump tells them by now, but somehow they're still shocked that he would lie to them as well. The white house has had that draft for almost a month while feeding talking points that they knew would likely be discredited in a few days.
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: bucket on January 27, 2020, 10:04:43 AM
https://twitter.com/matthewamiller/status/1221585861407576064
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: gatoveintisiete on January 27, 2020, 10:07:59 AM
duped again  :facepalm:
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: chum1 on January 27, 2020, 10:15:00 AM
https://twitter.com/ShimonPro/status/1221818109499146243
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: sonofdaxjones on January 27, 2020, 10:29:24 AM
John Bolton knows the game.   Anything substantial that's Anti-Trump immediately makes you a LibDork Nation hero.

He'll use the John McCain method.   McCain went from a war loving bomb everybody guy hated by the majority of LibDork Nation to instant LibDork Nation icon and beloved hero based on one vote. 

Bolton knows that if mega corrupt war monger Joe Biden gets elected, that he'll likely find a new voice via proxies somewhere within the massive NSC infrastructure that war monger Joe Biden will rebuild.  His old boss, mega war monger Barrack Obama had nearly 800 on his NSC staff (many of whom are holdovers who are really pissed off the U.S. is out of the regime change business, and want somebody like Obama back so they can begin regime changing and refugee'ing again).

Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: steve dave on January 27, 2020, 10:31:35 AM
lmao

https://twitter.com/UrbanAchievr/status/1221831515346214912
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: star seed 7 on January 27, 2020, 10:32:31 AM
John Bolton knows the game.   Anything substantial that's Anti-Trump immediately makes you a LibDork Nation hero.

He'll use the John McCain method.   McCain went from a war loving bomb everybody guy hated by the majority of LibDork Nation to instant LibDork Nation icon and beloved hero based on one vote. 

Bolton knows that if mega corrupt war monger Joe Biden gets elected, that he'll likely find a new voice via proxies somewhere within the massive NSC infrastructure that war monger Joe Biden will rebuild.  His old boss, mega war monger Barrack Obama had nearly 800 on his NSC staff (many of whom are holdovers who are really pissed off the U.S. is out of the regime change business, and want somebody like Obama back so they can begin regime changing and refugee'ing again).



Imagine believing this lmao
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: sonofdaxjones on January 27, 2020, 10:33:44 AM
John Bolton knows the game.   Anything substantial that's Anti-Trump immediately makes you a LibDork Nation hero.

He'll use the John McCain method.   McCain went from a war loving bomb everybody guy hated by the majority of LibDork Nation to instant LibDork Nation icon and beloved hero based on one vote. 

Bolton knows that if mega corrupt war monger Joe Biden gets elected, that he'll likely find a new voice via proxies somewhere within the massive NSC infrastructure that war monger Joe Biden will rebuild.  His old boss, mega war monger Barrack Obama had nearly 800 on his NSC staff (many of whom are holdovers who are really pissed off the U.S. is out of the regime change business, and want somebody like Obama back so they can begin regime changing and refugee'ing again).



Imagine believing this lmao

Imagine being so desperate to get back into the White House that you'll (once again) make a guy your movement absolutely despises a hero based on some accusations.

Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: Phil Titola on January 27, 2020, 10:36:00 AM
John Bolton should tetify = lib hero?

Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: sonofdaxjones on January 27, 2020, 10:37:29 AM
John Bolton should tetify = lib hero?

He'll be beloved by mainstream LibDork Nation far and wide, just like John "bomb everybody" McCain.



Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: steve dave on January 27, 2020, 10:56:42 AM
John Bolton should tetify = lib hero?

Anyone who talks bad about Trump is a libtard never trumper according to an incredibly disturbing percentage of our population. It’s not just Dax.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: LickNeckey on January 27, 2020, 10:59:01 AM
John Bolton knows the game.   Anything substantial that's Anti-Trump immediately makes you a LibDork Nation hero.

He'll use the John McCain method.   McCain went from a war loving bomb everybody guy hated by the majority of LibDork Nation to instant LibDork Nation icon and beloved hero based on one vote. 

Bolton knows that if mega corrupt war monger Joe Biden gets elected, that he'll likely find a new voice via proxies somewhere within the massive NSC infrastructure that war monger Joe Biden will rebuild.  His old boss, mega war monger Barrack Obama had nearly 800 on his NSC staff (many of whom are holdovers who are really pissed off the U.S. is out of the regime change business, and want somebody like Obama back so they can begin regime changing and refugee'ing again).



Imagine believing this lmao

Imagine being so desperate to get back into the White House that you'll (once again) make a guy your movement absolutely despises a hero based on some accusations.



 :billdance:
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: steve dave on January 27, 2020, 11:04:32 AM
lmao

https://twitter.com/UrbanAchievr/status/1221831515346214912

lmao

https://twitter.com/revrrlewis/status/1221819309628035072
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: Cire on January 27, 2020, 11:19:30 AM
HAHA
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: LickNeckey on January 27, 2020, 11:21:18 AM
after seing how difficult it was to tear down a goalpost as a youth i am perpepetually amazed with the ease at which Pubs are able to move them
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: sonofdaxjones on January 27, 2020, 11:23:23 AM
John Bolton should tetify = lib hero?

Anyone who talks bad about Trump is a libtard never trumper according to an incredibly disturbing percentage of our population. It’s not just Dax.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Everything "pro" Trump, particularly on the world stage and/or anti LibDork is "Russian Propaganda" or "Russian Disinformation" according to LibDork Nation and Fake Centrists.   It's quite disturbing, but not the least bit unexpected.

Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: Phil Titola on January 27, 2020, 12:19:02 PM
John Bolton should tetify = lib hero?

He'll be beloved by mainstream LibDork Nation far and wide, just like John "bomb everybody" McCain.

Why? For telling what he knows about this situation?
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: Phil Titola on January 27, 2020, 12:20:55 PM
John Bolton should tetify = lib hero?

Anyone who talks bad about Trump is a libtard never trumper according to an incredibly disturbing percentage of our population. It’s not just Dax.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Everything "pro" Trump, particularly on the world stage and/or anti LibDork is "Russian Propaganda" or "Russian Disinformation" according to LibDork Nation and Fake Centrists.   It's quite disturbing, but not the least bit unexpected.

Please cite an example of something pro trump that fits what you describe.
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: Phil Titola on January 27, 2020, 12:30:11 PM
John Bolton seems to be a huge POS that I don't agree with policy wise at all.

Imagine being such a crap president even john Bolton is like "wtf dude no we can't do that"

Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: steve dave on January 27, 2020, 12:32:25 PM
John Bolton should tetify = lib hero?

Anyone who talks bad about Trump is a libtard never trumper according to an incredibly disturbing percentage of our population. It’s not just Dax.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Everything "pro" Trump, particularly on the world stage and/or anti LibDork is "Russian Propaganda" or "Russian Disinformation" according to LibDork Nation and Fake Centrists.   It's quite disturbing, but not the least bit unexpected.

Please cite an example of something pro trump that fits what you describe.

Yeah, Dick Cheney is probably even rolling over in his Sunset Cemetery grave


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: star seed 7 on January 27, 2020, 01:36:27 PM
https://twitter.com/AriMelber/status/1221860945808580611

 :lol:
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: Rage Against the McKee on January 27, 2020, 01:37:57 PM
Impeachment should be used way more often than it is. It reflects pretty poorly on us that we haven't actually removed anyone through the process yet, imo.
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: chum1 on January 27, 2020, 01:40:08 PM
omg lol this video

https://twitter.com/TPMLiveWire/status/1221875345302937600
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: star seed 7 on January 27, 2020, 01:42:16 PM
Conservative media was absolutely insensed by the pen thing when it happened. I think dax has angerly referred to it a few times.
Title: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: sonofdaxjones on January 27, 2020, 01:44:06 PM
John Bolton should tetify = lib hero?

Anyone who talks bad about Trump is a libtard never trumper according to an incredibly disturbing percentage of our population. It’s not just Dax.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Everything "pro" Trump, particularly on the world stage and/or anti LibDork is "Russian Propaganda" or "Russian Disinformation" according to LibDork Nation and Fake Centrists.   It's quite disturbing, but not the least bit unexpected.

Please cite an example of something pro trump that fits what you describe.

Geezus Dude.  It’s like you’re utterly incapable of following anything.

For example every Ukrainian (of which there’s a bunch) who have said the Burisma deal etc etc was very corrupt and Biden et al needs to be investigated is immediately dismissed as “Russian Disinformation”. 
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: Phil Titola on January 27, 2020, 01:47:30 PM
John Bolton should tetify = lib hero?

Anyone who talks bad about Trump is a libtard never trumper according to an incredibly disturbing percentage of our population. It’s not just Dax.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Everything "pro" Trump, particularly on the world stage and/or anti LibDork is "Russian Propaganda" or "Russian Disinformation" according to LibDork Nation and Fake Centrists.   It's quite disturbing, but not the least bit unexpected.

Please cite an example of something pro trump that fits what you describe.

Geezus Dude.  It’s like you’re utterly incapable of following anything.

Tapped out straight away
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: chum1 on January 27, 2020, 01:48:54 PM
PENS.

DISTRIBUTED.

To the impeachment managers.

[Video of old people frowning.]

A celebratory moment.

Think about that.

Think about this.

A poignant moment.
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: sonofdaxjones on January 27, 2020, 01:49:51 PM
Conservative media was absolutely insensed by the pen thing when it happened. I think dax has angerly referred to it a few times.

Or laughing at Slurs Pelosi, which enrages LibDorks like you. 
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: sonofdaxjones on January 27, 2020, 01:53:21 PM
John Bolton should tetify = lib hero?

Anyone who talks bad about Trump is a libtard never trumper according to an incredibly disturbing percentage of our population. It’s not just Dax.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Everything "pro" Trump, particularly on the world stage and/or anti LibDork is "Russian Propaganda" or "Russian Disinformation" according to LibDork Nation and Fake Centrists.   It's quite disturbing, but not the least bit unexpected.

Please cite an example of something pro trump that fits what you describe.

Geezus Dude.  It’s like you’re utterly incapable of following anything.

Tapped out straight away

I added it to it.  But you always being behind the curve, while not unexpected, is still concerning.
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: Phil Titola on January 27, 2020, 02:05:12 PM
How is that pro trump?
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: Institutional Control on January 27, 2020, 02:11:39 PM
PENS.

DISTRIBUTED.

To the impeachment managers.

[Video of old people frowning.]

A celebratory moment.

Think about that.

Think about this.

A poignant moment.

https://twitter.com/KevinMKruse/status/1217611403365961728?s=20
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: Spracne on January 27, 2020, 02:18:23 PM
Man, I bet those "Untied States Senator" pens are quite the collector's item.
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: Dugout DickStone on January 27, 2020, 02:25:51 PM
So should I be enraged about the pen deal or no? 
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: steve dave on January 27, 2020, 02:32:08 PM
Man, I bet those "Untied States Senator" pens are quite the collector's item.

Like the Billy Ripken eff Face 89 Fleer of pens


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: ChiComCat on January 27, 2020, 02:42:08 PM
For the most part, the House and Senate accomplish very little.  If they want to keep a souvenir of the one thing they accomplish in their career likely to be in a history book, I'm all for it.
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: Rage Against the McKee on January 27, 2020, 02:58:13 PM
I was watching Ken Starr try to make his case over lunch and all I could think about is that this is the guy who thinks rape is ok. I associate him more with Baylor than Clinton at this point.
Title: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: sonofdaxjones on January 27, 2020, 03:38:01 PM
How is that pro trump?

My gawd you’re truly SlowDug
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: sonofdaxjones on January 27, 2020, 03:58:54 PM
 :lol: The good Lt. Col Alexanader Vindman's twin brother Yevgeny vets all memoirs and papers of current and former NSC employees.   :lol:  No wonder this leaked.

For those keeping score at home, the Vindman's are military guys that are 1000% truthful and must be believed . . . as long as it's Anti-Trump (or supporting a Dem lead regime change . . . but those are never explained and no approvals are ever asked for, so . . .  burn it down, walk away.   This is why these guys are all mad, no regime changin goin on, no defenseless countries being burned to the ground by this administration).




Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: star seed 7 on January 27, 2020, 04:12:45 PM
Remind me why you hate the vindman guy (other than his testimony was bad for trump)? Iirc you thought he's a sleeper agent or something.
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: sonofdaxjones on January 27, 2020, 04:16:00 PM
Remind me why you hate the vindman guy (other than his testimony was bad for trump)? Iirc you thought he's a sleeper agent or something.

It's just hilarious watching  you guys now believe every word from people in branches of the government your movement generally hates with the power of a 1000 suns and historically never believed anything they said, unless of course it was Lyin Susie Rice (or similar) or anti-Trump.

FFS LibDork.9, quite being both redundant and rhetorical.   

Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: star seed 7 on January 27, 2020, 04:18:11 PM
You didn't answer the question
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: sonofdaxjones on January 27, 2020, 04:21:14 PM
You didn't answer the question

I just did, I'm not going to entertain you Alex Jonesian pot addled delusions. 

Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: star seed 7 on January 27, 2020, 04:25:28 PM
So you hate him because other people find him credible and because of Susan Rice?

Well that's certainly on-brand for ol' grandax.

Do you no longer think he's a secret double agent traitor?
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: Dugout DickStone on January 27, 2020, 04:26:47 PM
agree with dax that alex jones is a total moron and anyone who believes anything he says is an even bigger idiot
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: Brock Landers on January 27, 2020, 04:28:19 PM
IIRC something about only knowing Vindman for 15 minutes but believing everything he says because he's a veteran.  This falls in line with Trump hating veterans because he's far too much of a pussy to ever be one.
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: sonofdaxjones on January 27, 2020, 04:32:13 PM
So you hate him because other people find him credible and because of Susan Rice?

Well that's certainly on-brand for ol' grandax.

Do you no longer think he's a secret double agent traitor?

The only people who find him truly credible are LibDorks.   There's plenty to question regarding his motives.   Secret double agent traitor?   LOL, substantial elements (like everybody) have run around for 3 years and accused just about everyone who has anything to do with Trump as being a Russian agent or being under control of Vlad Putin.   

Now you're losing your mind over any questioning of a guy of Ukrainian descent now making substantial accusations against the president and who was essentially coached by lead Democrat in the House who himself has been caught multiple times lying about his contact with whistle blowers and who hilariously made up his own transcript.

LibDork.9:  The most useful of the useful idiots

SMDH, sad



Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: star seed 7 on January 27, 2020, 04:33:02 PM
You didn't answer the question
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: sonofdaxjones on January 27, 2020, 04:35:38 PM
You didn't answer the question

There's no need to answer the question LibDork.9, because you've contrived this narrative that any questioning of this guy is a claim that he's a secret double agent.  Which is a false narrative.

That's just part and parcel to the reality that you'll believe every word of anyone that appears to be anti-Trump.   



Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: sys on January 27, 2020, 04:38:13 PM
lmao

https://twitter.com/UrbanAchievr/status/1221831515346214912

lmao

https://twitter.com/revrrlewis/status/1221819309628035072

my goodness.
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: star seed 7 on January 27, 2020, 04:38:58 PM
Why are you dodging this so much?  If you no longer believe he's a double agent then just say it and crush this false narrative. Really rub it in my face.
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: sonofdaxjones on January 27, 2020, 04:39:47 PM
Why are you dodging this so much?  If you no longer believe he's a double agent then just say it and crush this false narrative. Really rub it in my face.

Link?
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: lopakman on January 27, 2020, 04:40:03 PM
both of you are so ground in your beliefs that there's not even really any point in arguing with one another The truth probably lies in the middle maybe more tilted against MAGA cause he should shut his dick holster but hey it's still amusing that neither of you can see the flaws in your respective arguments  :bwpopcorn:

Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: sonofdaxjones on January 27, 2020, 04:42:13 PM
both of you are so ground in your beliefs that there's not even really any point in arguing with one another The truth probably lies in the middle maybe more tilted against MAGA cause he should shut his dick holster but hey it's still amusing that neither of you can see the flaws in your respective arguments  :bwpopcorn:

LibDork.9 has no real beliefs beyond protect the (D) movement at all costs.

Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: catastrophe on January 27, 2020, 04:44:20 PM
lmao

https://twitter.com/UrbanAchievr/status/1221831515346214912

lmao

https://twitter.com/revrrlewis/status/1221819309628035072

my goodness.

I'm a little busy right now, but someone can go ahead and plug in January Dax as well so we're rounded out:

September Dax
FTR I fully support the Executive Branch of our government investigating corruption on the part of current and form executive branch members in regards to their dealings with foreign governments as long as there's no quid-pro-quo.

October Dax
Dax, do you think there was a quid pro quo?

No, if Biden/Obama wasn't a quid pro quo than neither was this.

November Dax
I'm looking forward to the error of unquestioned foreign aid given with no stipulation, demand or expectation of change.

Let's make it rain U.S. dollars across the world!!
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: star seed 7 on January 27, 2020, 04:45:30 PM
Does anyone else have difficulty with answering if they think vindman is a double agent?

Personally, I do not.
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: Spracne on January 27, 2020, 04:46:28 PM
I have no idea who Vindman is, but I'm fairly confident he is a double agent at minimum. Possibly triple.
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: star seed 7 on January 27, 2020, 04:47:31 PM
I applaud your strength, keep telling your truth spracs
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: Brock Landers on January 27, 2020, 04:48:29 PM
I'm not sure if dax thinks he's a double agent but we're all a bunch of military fanbois

Again, they know they can't dispute or defend any facts but can only attack the process.

Or just unilaterally declare the personal feelings and opinions of individuals are absolute fact and wholly objective in order to fit an agenda.

Can you decipher who or what you're referring to here?  I was referring to Vindman, surely you're not gullible enough to believe that crap about a decorated veteran and foreign policy expert is making crap up and whose testimony isn't reliable.  Right?

He's testifying based on his opinion of what occurred.   We have the transcript of the call.    You just like just about everyone else didn't know this guy existed until about 15 minutes ago, but now in typical LibDerp fashion you've decided to wrap yourself in the flag of service, when the vast majority of time your movement makes fun of such things (Full Assimilation).
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: Rage Against the McKee on January 27, 2020, 04:50:29 PM
If I would have come into this impeachment supporting Trump, there is no way that dax's effort in this thread would have failed to change my mind.
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: sonofdaxjones on January 27, 2020, 04:52:01 PM
Does anyone else have difficulty with answering if they think vindman is a double agent?

Personally, I do not.

LOL, but at minimum you've implied that I've said he is a double agent and I just await the link.

LibDork.9:  A Vlad Putin approved useful idiot.
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: sonofdaxjones on January 27, 2020, 04:54:00 PM
If I would have come into this impeachment supporting Trump, there is no way that dax's effort in this thread would have failed to change my mind.

 :lol: :lol: :lol:  Like I'm going to change the mind of some of the most hardcore LibDork whackjobs on the planet  :lol: :lol:
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: chum1 on January 27, 2020, 04:54:54 PM
https://twitter.com/costareports/status/1221914289189138432
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: star seed 7 on January 27, 2020, 04:57:29 PM
I can't wait until they call Hillary and start grilling her on benghazi again
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: sonofdaxjones on January 27, 2020, 05:01:44 PM
Fantastic work in establishing the clear groundwork and factually reality that LibDork Leadership was 1000% all in, in allowing the Executive Branch leeway in conducting foreign affairs during the previous administration.   So much so that LibDork Leadership and LibDork Nation raised virtually no concerns or opposition to the previous administration quite literally burning nations to the ground for no reason.   LibDork Leadership showed virtually no concern or opposition when the executive leaders literally admitted on open mic that as soon as the 2012 election had come and gone,  He was ready, willing and able to be completed destroyed and owned by Vlad Putin.

Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: Rage Against the McKee on January 27, 2020, 05:02:31 PM
If I would have come into this impeachment supporting Trump, there is no way that dax's effort in this thread would have failed to change my mind.

 :lol: :lol: :lol:  Like I'm going to change the mind of some of the most hardcore LibDork whackjobs on the planet  :lol: :lol:

Switch sides and you might.
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: chum1 on January 27, 2020, 05:03:16 PM
I honestly do wonder who they'd call. I kinda think Hunter Biden is mostly a bluff and they wouldn't actually do something that ridiculous.
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: Rage Against the McKee on January 27, 2020, 05:04:35 PM
I'm hoping they call Joe.
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: sonofdaxjones on January 27, 2020, 05:05:10 PM
If I would have come into this impeachment supporting Trump, there is no way that dax's effort in this thread would have failed to change my mind.

 :lol: :lol: :lol:  Like I'm going to change the mind of some of the most hardcore LibDork whackjobs on the planet  :lol: :lol:

Switch sides and you might.

#bloomberg2020
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: catastrophe on January 27, 2020, 05:05:13 PM
Joe Biden, Hillary, and the whistleblower
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: star seed 7 on January 27, 2020, 05:09:55 PM
I think the elected officials know that nothing is there, but the daxags.com'rs of the world are going all in on hunter testifying. There are multiple threads every day asking why the Republicans won't call witnesses when they so obviously would prove this is a sham and throw hunter, papa frontrunner Joe, and Obama in jail.
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: sonofdaxjones on January 27, 2020, 05:13:43 PM
I think the elected officials know that nothing is there, but the daxags.com'rs of the world are going all in on hunter testifying. There are multiple threads every day asking why the Republicans won't call witnesses when they so obviously would prove this is a sham and throw hunter, papa frontrunner Joe, and Obama in jail.

I couldn't care less if Hunter Biden testifies or not.   Everyone already knows that Biden(s) are super corrupt, except you, clearly.   Everyone knows that LibDork Nation stands ready, willing and wanting to protect Joe Biden at all costs.   Once again, a mega corrupt Democrat is the Dem Presidential Front Runner, nothing ever really changes.



 





Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: chum1 on January 27, 2020, 05:14:27 PM
https://twitter.com/thehill/status/1221906260045574149
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: star seed 7 on January 27, 2020, 05:15:34 PM
https://twitter.com/thehill/status/1221906260045574149

Susan Collins is shocked  :surprised:
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: turnbull on January 27, 2020, 05:41:04 PM
Here is what is going to happen....the GOP would literally rather die than admit Trump is guilty as sin, living in DC everyone knows he's guilty. He'll get acquited and the Hunter Biden is much like Uranium One, Benghazi, Emailgate, White Water, Birtherism, Religion, Sharia Law...i mean stacking them up it's almost if all the GOP does is lie, (I mean come on without Gerrymandering they'd get crushed in the House Consistently and more than likely state legislatures around the country). Interesting war mongering comment about POTUS 44 though Dax,just curious which one is it....the Fox News Sissy or the Fox News War Monger president.....i mean at some point i just want the GOP to know they've shown these things dont matter to them Integrity, Ethics, Honesty, Transparency, Facts, Reality, Deficits, Debt, Truth, and Science. Trump could literally look into a camera Stab a baby, perform an abortion, and state F*ck yea I did a quid pro quo (as Sondland admitted there was), and the GOP would be the Baby was a Democrat, the abortion prevented hitler, and he was looking into corruption as revealed on Hannity and the Tin Foil Hat hour
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: chum1 on January 27, 2020, 07:03:49 PM
https://twitter.com/costareports/status/1221914289189138432

Uh, yeah. This is pretty obvious nonsense in hindsight.

https://twitter.com/ThePlumLineGS/status/1221959117494988800
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: Phil Titola on January 27, 2020, 07:29:56 PM
I think the elected officials know that nothing is there, but the daxags.com'rs of the world are going all in on hunter testifying. There are multiple threads every day asking why the Republicans won't call witnesses when they so obviously would prove this is a sham and throw hunter, papa frontrunner Joe, and Obama in jail.

I couldn't care less if Hunter Biden testifies or not.   Everyone already knows that Biden(s) are super corrupt, except you, clearly.   Everyone knows that LibDork Nation stands ready, willing and wanting to protect Joe Biden at all costs.   Once again, a mega corrupt Democrat is the Dem Presidential Front Runner, nothing ever really changes.



 

Did the Biden's foundation get shut down and pay MORE than $2M to verterans charities as a fine?  That's pretty corrupt.
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: Katpappy on January 27, 2020, 08:47:38 PM
John Bolton should tetify = lib hero?

Anyone who talks bad about Trump is a libtard never trumper according to an incredibly disturbing percentage of our population. It’s not just Dax.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

YES!  Anyone who reads Facebook knows this.  Why these rubes think this despicable person is such a great hero is a mystery to me.
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: Katpappy on January 27, 2020, 08:55:59 PM
omg lol this video

https://twitter.com/TPMLiveWire/status/1221875345302937600

 :ROFL:
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: Katpappy on January 27, 2020, 09:19:43 PM
I was watching Ken Starr try to make his case over lunch and all I could think about is that this is the guy who thinks rape is ok. I associate him more with Baylor than Clinton at this point.

The irony to this is he spent over 6 million to investigate the sexual deviant Clinton for the BLOWJOB.  He is a prime example of a low life two faced crap head; or to put it another way just one of Trump's buddies.   
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: steve dave on January 28, 2020, 11:20:27 AM
Trump REALLY doesn't want Bolton to testify

https://twitter.com/Acosta/status/1222201460219424768
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: steve dave on January 28, 2020, 11:22:29 AM
another Libtard Never Trump'er Lib Hero smDh

https://twitter.com/maggieNYT/status/1222204029280890882
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: Dugout DickStone on January 28, 2020, 11:25:25 AM
you forgot deep state
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: star seed 7 on January 28, 2020, 11:31:20 AM
I'm getting really sick and tired of these double agents
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: steve dave on January 28, 2020, 04:09:26 PM
https://twitter.com/mkraju/status/1222276483177230338


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: steve dave on January 28, 2020, 04:25:15 PM
We’ve come a long way folks. Frankly I don’t even know where we got these goalposts from.


https://twitter.com/cnn/status/1222278071312617473


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: Dugout DickStone on January 28, 2020, 04:28:41 PM
will they ever over play their hand on how absolutely stupid the trumpers are?  At some point will they realize he changes their position every day?
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: steve dave on January 28, 2020, 04:50:45 PM
https://twitter.com/hotlinejosh/status/1222288749813518339


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: Institutional Control on January 28, 2020, 04:58:22 PM
(https://media2.giphy.com/media/k49oXgsKbVQ4g/giphy.gif)


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: chum1 on January 28, 2020, 05:05:12 PM
Sweet
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: Dugout DickStone on January 29, 2020, 08:08:53 AM
So do they play the “it doesn’t matter, it’s not impeachable” or the “Bolton is a liar and mad because I fired him”?

Which is the better line for idiots to believe?
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: Phil Titola on January 29, 2020, 08:12:04 AM
They can run with both. They will believe both at the exact same time.
Title: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: steve dave on January 29, 2020, 08:12:14 AM
They are going with the first one now I believe. Dax, confirm?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: Dugout DickStone on January 29, 2020, 08:22:37 AM
 So they are pretending the “the call was perfect, there was no quid pro qui” point that they relied on for several months?  I’d be afraid of looking like a huge rube
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: sonofdaxjones on January 29, 2020, 08:45:18 AM
We’re now entering “we got’em” Phase 5 or is it 6? 

It’s going to be sad watching LibDork Nation: The Most Useful of Idiots now go all in on John Bolton.

A man they use to hate with the power of a 1000 suns. 
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: bucket on January 29, 2020, 08:49:18 AM
We’re now entering “we got’em” Phase 5 or is it 6? 

It’s going to be sad watching LibDork Nation: The Most Useful of Idiots now go all in on John Bolton.

A man they use to hate with the power of a 1000 suns.

As a witness? Sure, why not?  :dunno:
Title: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: sonofdaxjones on January 29, 2020, 09:10:11 AM
We’re now entering “we got’em” Phase 5 or is it 6? 

It’s going to be sad watching LibDork Nation: The Most Useful of Idiots now go all in on John Bolton.

A man they use to hate with the power of a 1000 suns.

As a witness? Sure, why not?  :dunno:

Useful idiots are too stupid to understand that nearly every dollar of US foreign aid for decades has been tied to some sort of quid pro quo.  Unless of course you are stupid and believe that the US has spent trillions on foreign out of shear benevolence and good will.

Now in an amazing turn of events, Democrats who according to themselves were extremely worried about corruption in the Ukraine.  Going so far as to forcing corrupt Ukrainian leaders to fire a “corrupt” prosecutor because he was so gosh darn corrupt . . . with a former VPOTUS openly bragging about getting the prosecutor fired because supposedly he was so gosh darn corrupt. 

Are now saying this  president shouldn’t have had any concerns about corruption in the Ukraine and thus should have just green lit, no questions asked foreign aid.   

LOL
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: Dugout DickStone on January 29, 2020, 09:13:56 AM
Quid pro quo is fine when using my tax dollars to assist the us in advancing the us taxpayer interests.

Djt used my tax dollars to help him win an election if the allegations are true.
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: catastrophe on January 29, 2020, 09:25:25 AM
So Dax, do you think there was a quid pro quo?
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: star seed 7 on January 29, 2020, 09:29:20 AM
Dax, why do you think Bolton should be blocked from testifying?
Title: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: sonofdaxjones on January 29, 2020, 09:51:11 AM
Quid pro quo is fine when using my tax dollars to assist the us in advancing the us taxpayer interests.

Djt used my tax dollars to help him win an election if the allegations are true.

LOL, you’re own rough ridin' party literally had whole commissions about the corruption in the Ukraine and then when ChiCom Joe became point man on the Ukraine suddenly there was a lot less concern about corruption.  Until of course the unilaterally declared “corrupt” Ukrainian prosecutor started doing some uncomfortable things in regards to Burisma and all of sudden corruption was a big deal again and (clearly) inextricably tied to the receipt of US foreign aid.

You can’t ask questions about our corruption (LibDork Nation).

But for Trump: You can’t have any concerns about corruption.

Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: waks on January 29, 2020, 10:01:19 AM
Quid pro quo is fine when using my tax dollars to assist the us in advancing the us taxpayer interests.

Djt used my tax dollars to help him win an election if the allegations are true.

LOL, you’re own rough ridin' party literally had whole commissions about the corruption in the Ukraine and then when ChiCom Joe became point man on the Ukraine suddenly there was a lot less concern about corruption.  Until of course the unilaterally declared “corrupt” Ukrainian prosecutor started doing some uncomfortable things in regards to Burisma and all of sudden corruption was a big deal again and (clearly) inextricably tied to the receipt of US foreign aid.

You can’t ask questions about our corruption (LibDork Nation).

But for Trump: You can’t have any concerns about corruption.
Lol, you're just making things up. The US, the EU and the IMF all wanted Shokin gone. Or do you not know what unilateral means?
Title: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: sonofdaxjones on January 29, 2020, 10:04:59 AM
Quid pro quo is fine when using my tax dollars to assist the us in advancing the us taxpayer interests.

Djt used my tax dollars to help him win an election if the allegations are true.

LOL, you’re own rough ridin' party literally had whole commissions about the corruption in the Ukraine and then when ChiCom Joe became point man on the Ukraine suddenly there was a lot less concern about corruption.  Until of course the unilaterally declared “corrupt” Ukrainian prosecutor started doing some uncomfortable things in regards to Burisma and all of sudden corruption was a big deal again and (clearly) inextricably tied to the receipt of US foreign aid.

You can’t ask questions about our corruption (LibDork Nation).

But for Trump: You can’t have any concerns about corruption.
Lol, you're just making things up. The US, the EU and the IMF all wanted Shokin gone. Or do you not know what unilateral means?

Lol, they literally went off their own decelerations of corruption.   Singling out individuals in the Ukraine and declaring that they (alone) were corrupt is positively LOL’able and only total idiots like you actually believe that.

There’s literally EU countries who right now as we speak do billions of Euro’s a year in business with entities run by oligarch’s and they don’t like it when their most favored oligarchs are being investigated . . . and/or they want to make sure they’re helping their favorite oligarchs put the competition out of business.
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: waks on January 29, 2020, 10:06:43 AM
Quid pro quo is fine when using my tax dollars to assist the us in advancing the us taxpayer interests.

Djt used my tax dollars to help him win an election if the allegations are true.

LOL, you’re own rough ridin' party literally had whole commissions about the corruption in the Ukraine and then when ChiCom Joe became point man on the Ukraine suddenly there was a lot less concern about corruption.  Until of course the unilaterally declared “corrupt” Ukrainian prosecutor started doing some uncomfortable things in regards to Burisma and all of sudden corruption was a big deal again and (clearly) inextricably tied to the receipt of US foreign aid.

You can’t ask questions about our corruption (LibDork Nation).

But for Trump: You can’t have any concerns about corruption.
Lol, you're just making things up. The US, the EU and the IMF all wanted Shokin gone. Or do you not know what unilateral means?

Lol, they literally went off their own decelerations of corruption.   Singling our individuals in the Ukraine and declaring that they (alone) were corrupt is positively LOL’able and only total idiots like you actually believe that.
:lol: Please continue. You look worse than you did in the Mahomes thread.
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: sonofdaxjones on January 29, 2020, 10:09:45 AM
Quid pro quo is fine when using my tax dollars to assist the us in advancing the us taxpayer interests.

Djt used my tax dollars to help him win an election if the allegations are true.

LOL, you’re own rough ridin' party literally had whole commissions about the corruption in the Ukraine and then when ChiCom Joe became point man on the Ukraine suddenly there was a lot less concern about corruption.  Until of course the unilaterally declared “corrupt” Ukrainian prosecutor started doing some uncomfortable things in regards to Burisma and all of sudden corruption was a big deal again and (clearly) inextricably tied to the receipt of US foreign aid.

You can’t ask questions about our corruption (LibDork Nation).

But for Trump: You can’t have any concerns about corruption.
Lol, you're just making things up. The US, the EU and the IMF all wanted Shokin gone. Or do you not know what unilateral means?

Lol, they literally went off their own decelerations of corruption.   Singling our individuals in the Ukraine and declaring that they (alone) were corrupt is positively LOL’able and only total idiots like you actually believe that.
:lol: Please continue. You look worse than you did in the Mahomes thread.

Lol, you’re literally declaring victory 3 years in hindsight.  That’s how sad you are Waks, FFS. 

Pathetic
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: LickNeckey on January 29, 2020, 10:11:34 AM
is it true that Giulianni was working to oust the new prosecutor who was targeting his associates interests in corruption investigations?
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: waks on January 29, 2020, 10:12:34 AM
Quid pro quo is fine when using my tax dollars to assist the us in advancing the us taxpayer interests.

Djt used my tax dollars to help him win an election if the allegations are true.

LOL, you’re own rough ridin' party literally had whole commissions about the corruption in the Ukraine and then when ChiCom Joe became point man on the Ukraine suddenly there was a lot less concern about corruption.  Until of course the unilaterally declared “corrupt” Ukrainian prosecutor started doing some uncomfortable things in regards to Burisma and all of sudden corruption was a big deal again and (clearly) inextricably tied to the receipt of US foreign aid.

You can’t ask questions about our corruption (LibDork Nation).

But for Trump: You can’t have any concerns about corruption.
Lol, you're just making things up. The US, the EU and the IMF all wanted Shokin gone. Or do you not know what unilateral means?

Lol, they literally went off their own decelerations of corruption.   Singling our individuals in the Ukraine and declaring that they (alone) were corrupt is positively LOL’able and only total idiots like you actually believe that.
:lol: Please continue. You look worse than you did in the Mahomes thread.

Lol, you’re literally declaring victory 3 years in hindsight.  That’s how sad you are Waks, FFS. 

Pathetic
Just pointing out a pattern, friend. Don't worry, when you go back and delete those posts, most won't remember them.
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: sonofdaxjones on January 29, 2020, 10:13:36 AM
is it true that Giulianni was working to oust the new prosecutor who was targeting his associates interests in corruption investigations?

Is it true that LibDorks want to believe a guy who is already under indictment by this administration?

Rhetorical question wants to know
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: sonofdaxjones on January 29, 2020, 10:17:12 AM
Quid pro quo is fine when using my tax dollars to assist the us in advancing the us taxpayer interests.

Djt used my tax dollars to help him win an election if the allegations are true.

LOL, you’re own rough ridin' party literally had whole commissions about the corruption in the Ukraine and then when ChiCom Joe became point man on the Ukraine suddenly there was a lot less concern about corruption.  Until of course the unilaterally declared “corrupt” Ukrainian prosecutor started doing some uncomfortable things in regards to Burisma and all of sudden corruption was a big deal again and (clearly) inextricably tied to the receipt of US foreign aid.

You can’t ask questions about our corruption (LibDork Nation).

But for Trump: You can’t have any concerns about corruption.
Lol, you're just making things up. The US, the EU and the IMF all wanted Shokin gone. Or do you not know what unilateral means?

Lol, they literally went off their own decelerations of corruption.   Singling our individuals in the Ukraine and declaring that they (alone) were corrupt is positively LOL’able and only total idiots like you actually believe that.
:lol: Please continue. You look worse than you did in the Mahomes thread.

Lol, you’re literally declaring victory 3 years in hindsight.  That’s how sad you are Waks, FFS. 

Pathetic
Just pointing out a pattern, friend. Don't worry, when you go back and delete those posts, most won't remember them.

And I’m only pointing out an ongoing pattern of your stupidity and rage.  So much rage that you’re literally jizzing yourself that I was wrong about a QB pick based on results 3 or 4 years later and then equating it to this discussion, LOL.

Tap out accepted.
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: waks on January 29, 2020, 10:26:33 AM
Quid pro quo is fine when using my tax dollars to assist the us in advancing the us taxpayer interests.

Djt used my tax dollars to help him win an election if the allegations are true.

LOL, you’re own rough ridin' party literally had whole commissions about the corruption in the Ukraine and then when ChiCom Joe became point man on the Ukraine suddenly there was a lot less concern about corruption.  Until of course the unilaterally declared “corrupt” Ukrainian prosecutor started doing some uncomfortable things in regards to Burisma and all of sudden corruption was a big deal again and (clearly) inextricably tied to the receipt of US foreign aid.

You can’t ask questions about our corruption (LibDork Nation).

But for Trump: You can’t have any concerns about corruption.
Lol, you're just making things up. The US, the EU and the IMF all wanted Shokin gone. Or do you not know what unilateral means?

Lol, they literally went off their own decelerations of corruption.   Singling our individuals in the Ukraine and declaring that they (alone) were corrupt is positively LOL’able and only total idiots like you actually believe that.
:lol: Please continue. You look worse than you did in the Mahomes thread.

Lol, you’re literally declaring victory 3 years in hindsight.  That’s how sad you are Waks, FFS. 

Pathetic
Just pointing out a pattern, friend. Don't worry, when you go back and delete those posts, most won't remember them.

And I’m only pointing out an ongoing pattern of your stupidity and rage.  So much rage that you’re literally jizzing yourself that I was wrong about a QB pick based on results 3 or 4 years later and then equating it to this discussion, LOL.

Tap out accepted.
Where was the tap out, exactly? You're deranged. Sorry that the cool kids are picking on you. Maybe if you shut up for once everyone wouldn't know you to be the miserable, old fool that you are.
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: treysolid on January 29, 2020, 10:30:00 AM
is it true that Giulianni was working to oust the new prosecutor who was targeting his associates interests in corruption investigations?

Is it true that LibDorks want to believe a guy who is already under indictment by this administration?

Rhetorical question wants to know

I mean, Parnas kept ALL the receipts. I don't have to believe HIM, per se. I can just look at the documented evidence.
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: sonofdaxjones on January 29, 2020, 11:19:28 AM
Quid pro quo is fine when using my tax dollars to assist the us in advancing the us taxpayer interests.

Djt used my tax dollars to help him win an election if the allegations are true.

LOL, you’re own rough ridin' party literally had whole commissions about the corruption in the Ukraine and then when ChiCom Joe became point man on the Ukraine suddenly there was a lot less concern about corruption.  Until of course the unilaterally declared “corrupt” Ukrainian prosecutor started doing some uncomfortable things in regards to Burisma and all of sudden corruption was a big deal again and (clearly) inextricably tied to the receipt of US foreign aid.

You can’t ask questions about our corruption (LibDork Nation).

But for Trump: You can’t have any concerns about corruption.
Lol, you're just making things up. The US, the EU and the IMF all wanted Shokin gone. Or do you not know what unilateral means?

Lol, they literally went off their own decelerations of corruption.   Singling our individuals in the Ukraine and declaring that they (alone) were corrupt is positively LOL’able and only total idiots like you actually believe that.
:lol: Please continue. You look worse than you did in the Mahomes thread.

Lol, you’re literally declaring victory 3 years in hindsight.  That’s how sad you are Waks, FFS. 

Pathetic
Just pointing out a pattern, friend. Don't worry, when you go back and delete those posts, most won't remember them.

And I’m only pointing out an ongoing pattern of your stupidity and rage.  So much rage that you’re literally jizzing yourself that I was wrong about a QB pick based on results 3 or 4 years later and then equating it to this discussion, LOL.

Tap out accepted.
Where was the tap out, exactly? You're deranged. Sorry that the cool kids are picking on you. Maybe if you shut up for once everyone wouldn't know you to be the miserable, old fool that you are.

The resident LibDorks are 17 degrees of separation from the “cool kids”.  This would include you, Waks.

I’m sorry (not really)  you’re too stupid to understand that picking out a single person in the Ukraine (who was investigating Burisma) and declaring them corrupt in 2015 (and even  now) is positively LOL’able.   Particularly in light of the known fact that the people who fired him were corrupt AF and were subsequently run out because of their corruption. 

BTW you can reach Burisma in Cyprus (LOL).   

Also, per the  Ukrainian government, literally within days of the firing of Shokin (Biden’s office), other factions within the US government were offering apologies for the dissemination of false information about the Ukrainian prosecutors office.  While US reps of Burisma were working on introducing Ukrainian prosecutors to the Obama Administration for a big mea culpa fest?  Weird.

But I know, only Ukrainians that are OrangeMan Bad to be believed.  The rest is Russian disinformation. 

Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: steve dave on January 29, 2020, 11:30:32 AM
 :bwpopcorn:

https://twitter.com/cnnbrk/status/1222572116257787904
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: sonofdaxjones on January 29, 2020, 11:46:05 AM
:bwpopcorn:

https://twitter.com/cnnbrk/status/1222572116257787904

Awesome.  Recently departed national security advisors shouldn’t be writing anything that has to be vetted (by known leakers).   

Particularly known leakers who are both pissed off about the lack of regime changing going on and pissed off that their former bosses corruption is being brought to light.
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: chum1 on January 29, 2020, 12:12:10 PM
https://twitter.com/AndrewDesiderio/status/1222574326358183939
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: chum1 on January 29, 2020, 12:16:45 PM
https://twitter.com/jaketapper/status/1222581995374555136
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: TheHamburglar on January 29, 2020, 12:25:41 PM
Is this about done so we can go back to regularly scheduled programming?
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: catastrophe on January 29, 2020, 12:40:23 PM
At this point it’s probably easier to just make a list of the witnesses who aren’t deep state never Trumpers.

Actually, Dax, are there any of those?
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: sonofdaxjones on January 29, 2020, 01:06:11 PM
Well it’s pretty clear that Ellen is a huge liar.

Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: star seed 7 on January 29, 2020, 01:32:40 PM
Dersh bringing back the "if the president does it, it's not illegal" defense. Dax obviously nods in agreement (if the president is a republican)
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: Spracne on January 29, 2020, 01:37:42 PM
Dersh bringing back the "if the president does it, it's not illegal" defense. Dax obviously nods in agreement (if the president is a republican)
I think A.D. has been effective today. It doesn't help that the Dems keep honorifically referring to him as "Professor"
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: steve dave on January 29, 2020, 01:43:29 PM
https://twitter.com/abc/status/1222600255369359362


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: steve dave on January 29, 2020, 01:52:23 PM
(https://uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/20200129/b1db55467d0cfd660675d1e94c507f29.jpg)


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: catastrophe on January 29, 2020, 01:58:47 PM
I hope you liked and retweeted that prescient tweet.
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: sonofdaxjones on January 29, 2020, 02:21:46 PM
SlowDug, looks like QPQ’s are just a Dem administration thing from here on out, so hopefully our guy Bloomberg is going to get elected. 

Also good to know that Bloomie’s VP is gonna be able to load up his kids and travel the world getting investments from foreign countries for the kid and/or installing the kid on boards of mega corrupt corporations out of Cyprus, The Caymans and similar.


Gonna be pretty great. 


Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: sonofdaxjones on January 29, 2020, 02:23:51 PM
Forgot to mention the ability to shakedown foreign governments without fear of repercussions.
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: star seed 7 on January 29, 2020, 02:27:41 PM
Forgot to mention the ability to shakedown foreign governments without fear of repercussions.

Do you think that's a bad thing?
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: LickNeckey on January 29, 2020, 02:29:08 PM
SlowDug, looks like QPQ’s are just a Dem administration thing from here on out, so hopefully our guy Bloomberg is going to get elected. 

Also good to know that Bloomie’s VP is gonna be able to load up his kids and travel the world getting investments from foreign countries for the kid and/or installing the kid on boards of mega corrupt corporations out of Cyprus, The Caymans and similar.


Gonna be pretty great.

https://www.gq.com/story/trump-kids-profit-presidency

i think the Trump kids agree
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: sonofdaxjones on January 29, 2020, 02:30:43 PM
Forgot to mention the ability to shakedown foreign governments without fear of repercussions.

Do you think that's a bad thing?

Oh no, particularly if you need somebody removed because you’re afraid that the investigation may get a kid kicked off a BOD, or worse. 

I hear those Cyprus (or similar) based corps can facilitate a “he fell down the stairs” scenario pretty quickly.
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: sonofdaxjones on January 29, 2020, 02:37:35 PM
SlowDug, looks like QPQ’s are just a Dem administration thing from here on out, so hopefully our guy Bloomberg is going to get elected. 

Also good to know that Bloomie’s VP is gonna be able to load up his kids and travel the world getting investments from foreign countries for the kid and/or installing the kid on boards of mega corrupt corporations out of Cyprus, The Caymans and similar.


Gonna be pretty great.

https://www.gq.com/story/trump-kids-profit-presidency

i think the Trump kids agree

Don’t see any BOD seats on Cyprus based corps with non existent financial statements or trips to China for few billion in funding (while in the midst of major trade negotiations) or anybody getting shook down on foreign aid.  But I did do a speed read. 
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: sonofdaxjones on January 29, 2020, 02:39:59 PM
I do appreciate how GQ like everyone else characterized the Burisma and Chinese deals (two examples) as “wildly distorted” though.

Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: star seed 7 on January 29, 2020, 03:23:38 PM
https://twitter.com/tedcruz/status/1222583748450975746

Pretty  :facepalm:  from cryin' chuck, but I wonder if Ted knows the circumstances around those serious felonies and who they were in service of?
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: sonofdaxjones on January 29, 2020, 03:32:55 PM
https://twitter.com/tedcruz/status/1222583748450975746

Pretty  :facepalm:  from cryin' chuck, but I wonder if Ted knows the circumstances around those serious felonies and who they were in service of?

Yep, in service of the same administration prosecuting him, right Lib?




Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: star seed 7 on January 29, 2020, 03:40:26 PM
Expand on that thought dax, tell me where you're going with it.
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: sonofdaxjones on January 29, 2020, 03:42:52 PM
Expand on that thought dax, tell me where you're going with it.

Lev Is under Federal indictment. 3 guesses as to which branch of government the DOJ falls under. 
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: star seed 7 on January 29, 2020, 03:55:42 PM
Is this a roundabout way of alledging a deep state plot? Rogue fbi coup?
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: sonofdaxjones on January 29, 2020, 04:02:51 PM
Is this a roundabout way of alledging a deep state plot? Rogue fbi coup?

No, you’re an amazing weirdo, tho

Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: Phil Titola on January 29, 2020, 04:03:03 PM
https://twitter.com/tedcruz/status/1222583748450975746

Pretty  :facepalm:  from cryin' chuck, but I wonder if Ted knows the circumstances around those serious felonies and who they were in service of?

Chuck pulling a Godfather.
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: star seed 7 on January 29, 2020, 04:08:32 PM
Is this a roundabout way of alledging a deep state plot? Rogue fbi coup?

No, you’re an amazing weirdo, tho

Well it's either that or you think it's impossible that trump and his surrogates are involved (despite evidence otherwise) because Lev was caught by the FBI.

Just say what you mean bud.
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: sonofdaxjones on January 29, 2020, 04:18:27 PM
Is this a roundabout way of alledging a deep state plot? Rogue fbi coup?

No, you’re an amazing weirdo, tho

Well it's either that or you think it's impossible that trump and his surrogates are involved (despite evidence otherwise) because Lev was caught by the FBI.

Just say what you mean bud.

Lib. You’re so thirsty it’s just sad. 

Remember Barr is just Trump’s lackey and so on down the line. 

Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: sonofdaxjones on January 29, 2020, 04:27:03 PM
Schiff refusing to answer questions about the motive and political leanings of the whistleblower is so on point. 

But he’s LibDork Nations guy.
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: Phil Titola on January 29, 2020, 08:09:55 PM
3 years later, Obama still lives in the White house.  JFC.
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: sonofdaxjones on January 29, 2020, 10:47:20 PM
I agree that President Stand Down’s woeful and disgraceful abandoning of Ukraine in a time of need.  On top of the disgusting shake down of the Ukraine by Joe Biden is something that LibDorks need to distance themselves from. 

Not to mention the thugs that President Stand Down wanted in power in the Ukraine.

Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: chum1 on January 30, 2020, 08:08:33 AM
lol

https://twitter.com/atrupar/status/1222697695397191681
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: Dugout DickStone on January 30, 2020, 08:17:37 AM
Lol.  Trumpers are so old/dumb
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: steve dave on January 30, 2020, 09:09:25 AM
https://twitter.com/kt_so_it_goes/status/1222899194299441152


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: chum1 on January 30, 2020, 09:37:56 AM
https://twitter.com/tedcruz/status/1222583748450975746

Pretty  :facepalm:  from cryin' chuck

Ted Cruz :rolleyes:

https://twitter.com/ddale8/status/1222640187433504768
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: steve dave on January 30, 2020, 09:40:52 AM
lmao


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: Dugout DickStone on January 30, 2020, 09:57:24 AM
Rofl
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: catastrophe on January 30, 2020, 10:18:03 AM
Can’t make that up
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: star seed 7 on January 30, 2020, 10:59:44 AM
Twitter thread that will likely require an update to the dax meltdown thread after he sees it.

https://twitter.com/HeidiNBC/status/1222912159165841410
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: Dugout DickStone on January 30, 2020, 11:05:01 AM
lmao
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: steve dave on January 30, 2020, 11:21:34 AM
Oh no


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: DaBigTrain on January 30, 2020, 11:24:24 AM
:lol:
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: sonofdaxjones on January 30, 2020, 11:25:43 AM
The (one of the) real reasons why LibDork Leadership and ChiCom Joe The Shakedown King don't want many questions being asked:

This did not begin under President Trump but under President George W. Bush, when then Ukrainian President Viktor Yushchenko’s “Orange Revolution” began rehabilitating Ukraine’s wartime killers of Jews, and it grew under President Obama, who, along with Vice President Joseph Biden, were deeply complicit in the Maidan coup and what followed.


https://www.thenation.com/article/archive/americas-COLUSION-with-neo-nazis/



Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: sonofdaxjones on January 30, 2020, 11:29:09 AM
Twitter thread that will likely require an update to the dax meltdown thread after he sees it.

https://twitter.com/HeidiNBC/status/1222912159165841410

Awesome, so a quid pro quo with Biden clearly established, and since Joe was part of the good ol boy network and since the West Wing was directing all questions about the Biden family in the Ukraine to ChiCom Joe's office (really nipping that corruption in the bud) . . . doubtful anybody picked up the phone to see if ChiCom Joe the Shakedown King was trying to protect his kid (which he was).



Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: sonofdaxjones on January 30, 2020, 11:30:20 AM
your link is dead Dax and i cant find the article

Works perfectly fine here Lick, time to drop the dial-up.

Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: star seed 7 on January 30, 2020, 11:44:39 AM
It's the word filter
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: LickNeckey on January 30, 2020, 11:44:50 AM
The (one of the) real reasons why LibDork Leadership and ChiCom Joe The Shakedown King don't want many questions being asked:

This did not begin under President Trump but under President George W. Bush, when then Ukrainian President Viktor Yushchenko’s “Orange Revolution” began rehabilitating Ukraine’s wartime killers of Jews, and it grew under President Obama, who, along with Vice President Joseph Biden, were deeply complicit in the Maidan coup and what followed.


https://www.thenation.com/article/archive/americas-COLUSION-with-neo-nazis/

couldn't get it to work (still get a page not found) but was able to google and read it.

good article

not sure what information presented "libdork leadership" would be afraid of coming out
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: LickNeckey on January 30, 2020, 11:49:45 AM
also wouldn't this line of logic neuter Republicans recent attacks on Obama policy

“We put up a lot of money. I gave you anti-tank busters that, frankly, President Obama was sending you pillows and sheets,” Trump said.

so Trump is giving Neo-Nazis weapons and Obama gave them pillows and sheets???
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: sonofdaxjones on January 30, 2020, 12:01:16 PM
also wouldn't this line of logic neuter Republicans recent attacks on Obama policy

“We put up a lot of money. I gave you anti-tank busters that, frankly, President Obama was sending you pillows and sheets,” Trump said.

so Trump is giving Neo-Nazis weapons and Obama gave them pillows and sheets???

Hey great point, except for the LibDork complete meltdown about Russians under every rock.   

Just glad our current president was thinking about having the new (Jewish) Leader of the Ukraine look into ChiCom Joe the Shakedown King (and Nazi facilitator)

Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: LickNeckey on January 30, 2020, 12:15:59 PM
oh Dax
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: sonofdaxjones on January 30, 2020, 12:17:05 PM
oh Dax

In the last two days Lick has clearly wanted the U.S. engaged in yet another fossil fuel conflict and now trying to pooh-pooh away his guy(s) supporting Nazi's.

SMDH

Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: LickNeckey on January 30, 2020, 12:47:33 PM
from your article...

That the Azov Battalion of some 3,000 well-armed fighters, which has played a major combat role in the Ukrainian civil war and now is an official component of Kiev’s armed forces, is avowedly “partially” pro-Nazi, as evidenced by its regalia, slogans, and programmatic statements, and well-documented as such by several international monitoring organizations. Congressional legislation recently banned Azov from receiving any US military aid, but it is likely to obtain some of the new weapons recently sent to Kiev by the Trump Administration
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: sonofdaxjones on January 30, 2020, 12:56:06 PM
from your article...

That the Azov Battalion of some 3,000 well-armed fighters, which has played a major combat role in the Ukrainian civil war and now is an official component of Kiev’s armed forces, is avowedly “partially” pro-Nazi, as evidenced by its regalia, slogans, and programmatic statements, and well-documented as such by several international monitoring organizations. Congressional legislation recently banned Azov from receiving any US military aid, but it is likely to obtain some of the new weapons recently sent to Kiev by the Trump Administration

Which is why providing aid to the Ukraine must always be vetted.   

But even a complete dummy like you knows that if the word got out that the Trump administration continued the policies of non-lethal aid to the Ukraine that LibDork Nation would have done a complete 180 and lost their mind and said that it was just more proof that Trump was a Putin puppet.   

Now, about the fact that your guys played a key role in getting those people in power . . .



Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: steve dave on January 30, 2020, 01:02:51 PM
lmaoooooooo

https://twitter.com/atrupar/status/1222955730900279296
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: Dugout DickStone on January 30, 2020, 01:59:53 PM
no way
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: Institutional Control on January 30, 2020, 05:49:14 PM
How many minutes at the hotel bar would it take Hunter to get Pam to back to his room?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: chum1 on January 30, 2020, 09:54:38 PM
Re: yes or no on witnesses

https://twitter.com/mkraju/status/1223091173516029952
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: chum1 on January 30, 2020, 09:56:20 PM
https://twitter.com/alivitali/status/1223092076822306816
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: chum1 on January 30, 2020, 10:03:40 PM
https://twitter.com/mkraju/status/1223093815285862401
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: steve dave on January 30, 2020, 10:31:24 PM
Congrats Dax


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: DaBigTrain on January 30, 2020, 10:55:52 PM
Congrats everyone we have crowned a king
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: chum1 on January 30, 2020, 11:06:05 PM
They were never going to convict, of course. But it's still depressing to give up on the idea that a president isn't ever going to be more corrupt than Nixon for fear of suffering similar consequences. It's added insult to injury that the guy skating by is a total imbecile who is incapable of grasping the significance of any of this.
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: sonofdaxjones on January 30, 2020, 11:39:46 PM
Congrats everyone we have crowned a king

Don’t worry Da Big Dummy, Bernie’s already got an executive order list that’s only missing “dictator for life” and they’re just ironing out some wording on that one.

Liz is gonna toss all political opponents in jail, even if you were just some wonk paper pusher who worked on the same level as George Conway’s job offer, Liz is gonna prosecute your ass. 

She’s also gonna unilaterally declare people disinformation agents and prosecute them. What’s next?  The revival of Obama’s indefinite detention thought balloon? 

You’ll get your chance to put the Brownshirt and armband on again soon enough.  Keep those jackboots polished. 
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: chum1 on January 31, 2020, 06:43:04 AM
Hi, I'm dax and I'm here in the impeachment thread to hate on everyone except the guy that is being impeached and is the guy most hated by everyone else.
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: star seed 7 on January 31, 2020, 07:31:03 AM
Dax is still salty about nixon getting railroaded, but at least all his hard work has paid off and he finally gets an unchecked executive. Celebrate responsibly my friend.
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: DaBigTrain on January 31, 2020, 07:31:30 AM
https://twitter.com/jessecharleslee/status/1223007896855810050
Title: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: sonofdaxjones on January 31, 2020, 08:35:28 AM
I’m sorry your guys did such a shitty job with their impeachment guys and that you actually thought known liar and fabricator of “evidence” Adam Schiff would get this done. 

Remember, this is the guy who had “hard evidence” of Russian COLUSION, you guys believed that as well.

Don’t worry you’ll get your imperial president back, and they’ll wreck nations with no debate or approval , enter into shitty agreements with no congressional over sight and sign a myriad of dictatorial executive orders while trying to install theocracies around the world soon enough.
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: star seed 7 on January 31, 2020, 08:38:01 AM
You might have missed the republican that said he doesn't need witnesses because trump is guilty but so what Heil trump.
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: sonofdaxjones on January 31, 2020, 08:40:44 AM
You might have missed the republican that said he doesn't need witnesses because trump is guilty but so what Heil trump.

Oh okay their Lib.  Just admit that a disenfranchised LibDork like you doesn’t understand that Lib mainstream aka Slurs Pelosi on down is scared shitless of Nominee Bernie and that’s what this is all about. 
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: star seed 7 on January 31, 2020, 08:41:17 AM
Daxflection!
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: sonofdaxjones on January 31, 2020, 08:42:15 AM
Daxflection!

It’s RageFriday with LibDork.9!!
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: gatoveintisiete on January 31, 2020, 10:42:23 AM
Damn I thought you guys had him this time....
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: steve dave on January 31, 2020, 11:07:35 AM
https://twitter.com/oliverdarcy/status/1223290847200010241


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: gatoveintisiete on January 31, 2020, 11:11:33 AM
Man you guys were robbed
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: star seed 7 on January 31, 2020, 11:13:36 AM
27, if Bolton is being truthful, do you approve of trump's behavior?
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: star seed 7 on January 31, 2020, 11:17:54 AM
As a side note, between this, the mueller report, and various other scandals, it's amazing to me how many people in this administration just ignore direct orders from the president. No one has any respect for him at all
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: chum1 on January 31, 2020, 11:19:01 AM
Damn I thought you guys had him this time....

You might have been the only one who thought so.
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: gatoveintisiete on January 31, 2020, 11:22:40 AM
Damn I thought you guys had him this time....

You might have been the only one who thought so.

well if things would have been fair you would have got him
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: sonofdaxjones on January 31, 2020, 11:59:56 AM
I’m all for investigating anyone who facilitated the installment of a new government with the help of Nazi’s.
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: chum1 on January 31, 2020, 12:26:14 PM
https://twitter.com/oliverdarcy/status/1223290847200010241

Law twitter says Cipollone is in big trouble.
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: star seed 7 on January 31, 2020, 12:30:00 PM
Lol, right
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: Dugout DickStone on January 31, 2020, 12:31:06 PM
As a side note, between this, the mueller report, and various other scandals, it's amazing to me how many people in this administration just ignore direct orders from the president. No one has any respect for him at all

Everyone ignores him.  That’s why he’s harmless and also hilarious theater
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: star seed 7 on January 31, 2020, 12:31:56 PM
https://twitter.com/jaketapper/status/1223303649289494533

Oof....
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: chum1 on January 31, 2020, 12:34:53 PM
Lol, right

I think lots of people are going to get in trouble (in addition to those who already have). It's just that Trump won't be one be one of them.
Title: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: steve dave on January 31, 2020, 12:44:31 PM
Lol, right

I think lots of people are going to get in trouble (in addition to those who already have). It's just that Trump won't be one be one of them.

It’s incredible how many people have already been convicted. Like, just surround yourself with people who don’t do crimes nonstop. Pretty easy. I do it all the time.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: star seed 7 on January 31, 2020, 12:47:11 PM
LOL

https://twitter.com/geofkoss/status/1223309686965002240
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: catastrophe on January 31, 2020, 12:48:52 PM
What on earth
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: chum1 on January 31, 2020, 12:51:00 PM
I appreciate the honesty.
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: Brock Landers on January 31, 2020, 12:51:06 PM
"I don't think any new information changes anything."

What the actual eff
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: chum1 on January 31, 2020, 12:55:46 PM
lolololol

https://twitter.com/atrupar/status/1223311565484630017
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: Rage Against the McKee on January 31, 2020, 04:57:52 PM
Rubio said that he doesn't need new witnesses because at this point he believes everything the democrats are saying and even believes it rises to an impeachable offense. He's not going to vote for removal, though, because partisan impeachment is bad. Therefore, he must vote in a partisan manner.

Someone really should ask Ben Sasse how he's voting. We should get an entertaining response there, too.
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: catastrophe on January 31, 2020, 08:38:51 PM
Future tyrants are going to love the crap out of the Rubio and Dershowitz quotes.
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: sonofdaxjones on February 03, 2020, 02:33:34 PM
https://jonathanturley.org/2020/02/02/gerhardt-the-entire-white-house-defense-team-will-face-bar-charges/

Please don’t give any more ideas to Liz Warren.  She’s already planning to imprison all political opposition and prosecute all political opposition thought.


Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: star seed 7 on February 03, 2020, 02:55:19 PM
Dax, can you please post the Warren quote you keep obviously twisting? I don't even see this talking point on texags so I'm sure it's fantastic
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: sonofdaxjones on February 03, 2020, 03:47:14 PM
Dax, can you please post the Warren quote you keep obviously twisting? I don't even see this talking point on texags so I'm sure it's fantastic

Oh Lib, you haven't heard about Liz's "Restoring our Government After Trump" initiative? 
 :lol:


Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: star seed 7 on February 03, 2020, 03:58:01 PM
So is that a no on the link?
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: sonofdaxjones on February 03, 2020, 03:59:24 PM
So is that a no on the link?



www.google.com (http://www.google.com)

Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: star seed 7 on February 03, 2020, 04:03:04 PM
I see...
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: mocat on February 03, 2020, 04:11:36 PM
linking to google dot com when you got nothing is a classic wacky move
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: sonofdaxjones on February 03, 2020, 04:13:46 PM
linking to google dot com when you got nothing is a classic wacky move

All you have to do is cut and paste the name of the initative and it's literally the first thing.   

I'm not sorry you guys don't pay any attention to what your potential Presidential nominees are saying and this surprises me very much, because normally you guys are all over anything relative to Trump or anyone working in the Trump administration going to prison like flies on defecation.

Title: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: steve dave on February 03, 2020, 04:35:40 PM
I have been curious about this one myself. Assumed it was just a Qanon or infowars talking point though.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: chum1 on February 03, 2020, 04:39:36 PM
I think dax points out that one as opposed to a hundred others because he is offended by the idea that anyone would want to undo Trump.
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: sonofdaxjones on February 03, 2020, 04:48:43 PM
I think dax points out that one as opposed to a hundred others because he is offended by the idea that anyone would want to undo Trump.

In retrospect, I'm not the least bit surprised that resident LibDorks (that includes resident fake centrists) would pass over two potentially draconian proposals from Liz Warren . . . that literally came straight from Soccer Grandma's Mouth/Twitter/Campaign.

The second one is Liz wanting to have the power to unilaterally declare information "disinformation" and prosecute.   Joe Stalin and friends nod in approval.



Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: star seed 7 on February 03, 2020, 04:51:17 PM
Any link for that?
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: sonofdaxjones on February 03, 2020, 04:53:38 PM
Any link for that?

If it's not Alex Jones or Texags, LibDork.9 doesn't have a clue (not surprising)

https://www.cnbc.com/2020/01/29/warren-proposes-criminal-penalties-for-spreading-disinformation-online.html

Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: star seed 7 on February 03, 2020, 04:57:35 PM
That doesn't say what you said it does tho  :confused:

Maybe a different link?
Title: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: steve dave on February 03, 2020, 05:31:25 PM
Post the correct link Dax


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: sonofdaxjones on February 03, 2020, 07:18:31 PM
Yes guys, no possible way that could be abused.  #eyeroll

Apparent Liz doesn’t understand our current laws.

But you guys lived  an administration that at one time floated the concept of indefinite detention without charge. 
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: sonofdaxjones on February 03, 2020, 07:22:31 PM
Impeachment on hypothetical(s) now?  Libs, this is your leader.  #insane #lol

https://twitter.com/dailycaller/status/1224419427363573761?s=21
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: star seed 7 on February 03, 2020, 07:56:29 PM
Confusion  :frown:
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: sonofdaxjones on February 03, 2020, 08:52:57 PM
The go to tap out never sleeps
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: sonofdaxjones on February 03, 2020, 08:53:53 PM
https://twitter.com/DocJackGriffin/status/1224420411049500673?s=20
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: Katpappy on February 03, 2020, 11:50:05 PM
https://twitter.com/DocJackGriffin/status/1224420411049500673?s=20

Hell Ya!  Why do you think he authorized the Space Farce.  :lol:
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: sonofdaxjones on February 04, 2020, 05:56:39 AM
https://twitter.com/DocJackGriffin/status/1224420411049500673?s=20

Hell Ya!  Why do you think he authorized the Space Farce.  :lol:

You mean brought what already existed in secret for years into the age of accountability?
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: LickNeckey on February 04, 2020, 11:18:26 AM
was Air Force Space Command not being held accountable in some way?
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: sonofdaxjones on February 04, 2020, 04:22:45 PM
was Air Force Space Command not being held accountable in some way?

Just admit you've never heard of the "black budget", and we can all agree with you and move on.

Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: Rage Against the McKee on February 04, 2020, 04:51:56 PM
I thought all government budgets were in the red. :lol: :lol: :lol:

hoo boy
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: DaBigTrain on February 04, 2020, 07:21:43 PM
:Keke:
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: LickNeckey on February 04, 2020, 09:45:16 PM
was Air Force Space Command not being held accountable in some way?

Just admit you've never heard of the "black budget", and we can all agree with you and move on.

Isn't it believed that Trump asked for a significant increase in black budget spending?

I wonder why they needed an increase with all of this space force money now being accounted for
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: sonofdaxjones on February 04, 2020, 10:26:29 PM
was Air Force Space Command not being held accountable in some way?

Just admit you've never heard of the "black budget", and we can all agree with you and move on.

Isn't it believed that Trump asked for a significant increase in black budget spending?

I wonder why they needed an increase with all of this space force money now being accounted for

I wonder where I said there was no more black budget.

Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: steve dave on February 05, 2020, 01:25:33 PM
Romney is the first US Senator in American history to vote to remove a president of his own party


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: sonofdaxjones on February 05, 2020, 01:27:40 PM
Romney is the first US Senator in American history to vote to remove a president of his own party


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Which state is Mitt representing this week?

Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: LickNeckey on February 05, 2020, 01:30:03 PM
also the parties previous nominee for President

 :ROFL:
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: 8manpick on February 05, 2020, 01:30:10 PM
Romney is the first US Senator in American history to vote to remove a president of his own party


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Which state is Mitt representing this week?
Good one, got his ass
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: Brock Landers on February 05, 2020, 01:32:46 PM
Good for Mitt, it also takes away the "PARTISAN HOAX!!!!" talking point that Trump likes so much.
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: sonofdaxjones on February 05, 2020, 01:34:06 PM
Romney is the first US Senator in American history to vote to remove a president of his own party


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Which state is Mitt representing this week?
Good one, got his ass

The fact that LibDork Nation is clearly on the verge (if they haven't already) of calling Mitt one of their own is the most LOL'able of them all  :lol:

But then again, they way Mitt half assed his way to 2008 (as you guys bought Hope and Change hook-line-sinker) you guys should like him. 

Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: LickNeckey on February 05, 2020, 01:39:34 PM
 :ROFL:
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: sonofdaxjones on February 05, 2020, 01:40:59 PM
:ROFL:

Some people like Lick don't understand that this is a personal thing for Mitt.   But you guys keep hoping, I guess. 

Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: LickNeckey on February 05, 2020, 01:48:16 PM
or...

now here me out,

the party has changed significantly to align itself with a grifter and you are all like  :Take the Bait:
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: sonofdaxjones on February 05, 2020, 01:50:38 PM
or...

now here me out,

the party has changed significantly to align itself with a grifter and you are all like  :Take the Bait:

After 8 years in office (2009-2017) we had a significant portion of certain communities in our nation pretty much saying those 8 years were a great big nothing for them . . . but here we are talking about grifters.

Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: waks on February 05, 2020, 01:53:43 PM
Romney is the first US Senator in American history to vote to remove a president of his own party


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Which state is Mitt representing this week?
Good one, got his ass

The fact that LibDork Nation is clearly on the verge (if they haven't already) of calling Mitt one of their own is the most LOL'able of them all  :lol:

But then again, they way Mitt half assed his way to 2008 (as you guys bought Hope and Change hook-line-sinker) you guys should like him.
:confused:
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: sonofdaxjones on February 05, 2020, 01:55:04 PM
Romney is the first US Senator in American history to vote to remove a president of his own party


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Which state is Mitt representing this week?
Good one, got his ass

The fact that LibDork Nation is clearly on the verge (if they haven't already) of calling Mitt one of their own is the most LOL'able of them all  :lol:

But then again, they way Mitt half assed his way to 2008 (as you guys bought Hope and Change hook-line-sinker) you guys should like him.
:confused:

You missed Mitt's run for president?

Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: LickNeckey on February 05, 2020, 01:55:39 PM
it's okay

i would also be embarassed if i whined for 8 years about Obama care, Deficit Spending, and Executive Overreach and then was forced to do 180's to lick a boot
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: waks on February 05, 2020, 01:56:19 PM
Romney is the first US Senator in American history to vote to remove a president of his own party


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Which state is Mitt representing this week?
Good one, got his ass

The fact that LibDork Nation is clearly on the verge (if they haven't already) of calling Mitt one of their own is the most LOL'able of them all  :lol:

But then again, they way Mitt half assed his way to 2008 (as you guys bought Hope and Change hook-line-sinker) you guys should like him.
:confused:

You missed Mitt's run for president?
He ran in 2012 dude
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: star seed 7 on February 05, 2020, 01:57:51 PM
Confusion  :frown:
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: sonofdaxjones on February 05, 2020, 01:59:50 PM
it's okay

i would also be embarassed if i whined for 8 years about Obama care, Deficit Spending, and Executive Overreach and then was forced to do 180's to lick a boot

I've actually assailed Trump's spending numerous times . . . which is why I can't figure out why you guys hate him so much, he spends like a socialist drunk on potato vodka.

I'm sorry your guy set the bar of executive overreach way way way out at unilaterally destroying nations with no explanation of any kind to the American people and/or a dangerous and worthless nuclear agreement agreed upon behind closed doors with zero oversight . . . while his VP was shaking down foreign governments for cash and protection (while trying to install the Muslim Brotherhood in power in various ME nations) etc. etc. etc. 



Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: sonofdaxjones on February 05, 2020, 02:01:43 PM
Romney is the first US Senator in American history to vote to remove a president of his own party


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Which state is Mitt representing this week?
Good one, got his ass

The fact that LibDork Nation is clearly on the verge (if they haven't already) of calling Mitt one of their own is the most LOL'able of them all  :lol:

But then again, they way Mitt half assed his way to 2008 (as you guys bought Hope and Change hook-line-sinker) you guys should like him.
:confused:

You missed Mitt's run for president?
He ran in 2012 dude

He ran in 2008 and we got John "the old guy" McCain.   Good lawd . . .

Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: LickNeckey on February 05, 2020, 02:03:15 PM
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2012_United_States_presidential_election

 :ROFL:
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: LickNeckey on February 05, 2020, 02:04:18 PM
Romney is the first US Senator in American history to vote to remove a president of his own party


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Which state is Mitt representing this week?
Good one, got his ass

The fact that LibDork Nation is clearly on the verge (if they haven't already) of calling Mitt one of their own is the most LOL'able of them all  :lol:

But then again, they way Mitt half assed his way to 2008 (as you guys bought Hope and Change hook-line-sinker) you guys should like him.
:confused:

You missed Mitt's run for president?
He ran in 2012 dude

He ran in 2008 and we got John "the old guy" McCain.   Good lawd . . .

before it gets daxleted
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: waks on February 05, 2020, 02:05:38 PM
Romney is the first US Senator in American history to vote to remove a president of his own party


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Which state is Mitt representing this week?
Good one, got his ass

The fact that LibDork Nation is clearly on the verge (if they haven't already) of calling Mitt one of their own is the most LOL'able of them all  :lol:

But then again, they way Mitt half assed his way to 2008 (as you guys bought Hope and Change hook-line-sinker) you guys should like him.
:confused:

You missed Mitt's run for president?
He ran in 2012 dude

He ran in 2008 and we got John "the old guy" McCain.   Good lawd . . .
Lol that's not what you meant. Go ahead and delete that post, I'll delete my replies to it so you can save face.
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: sonofdaxjones on February 05, 2020, 02:06:00 PM
So Mitt Romney didn't run for president in 2008 and then quit,  and endorsing McCain with some bullshit about how he didn't want to divide the party?

Super weird.

Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: Brock Landers on February 05, 2020, 02:07:56 PM
This is dax's Sharpie moment.
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: sonofdaxjones on February 05, 2020, 02:08:51 PM
Romney is the first US Senator in American history to vote to remove a president of his own party


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Which state is Mitt representing this week?
Good one, got his ass

The fact that LibDork Nation is clearly on the verge (if they haven't already) of calling Mitt one of their own is the most LOL'able of them all  :lol:

But then again, they way Mitt half assed his way to 2008 (as you guys bought Hope and Change hook-line-sinker) you guys should like him.
:confused:

You missed Mitt's run for president?
He ran in 2012 dude

He ran in 2008 and we got John "the old guy" McCain.   Good lawd . . .
Lol that's not what you meant. Go ahead and delete that post, I'll delete my replies to it so you can save face.

I'm sorry you guys forgot Romney ran in 2008.

 :frown:
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: waks on February 05, 2020, 02:12:17 PM
Ok, so why should we like Romney because of the way he half assed his way to 2008 and not because of his 2012 loss?
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: catastrophe on February 05, 2020, 02:13:48 PM
The fact that LibDork Nation is clearly on the verge (if they haven't already) of calling Mitt one of their own is the most LOL'able of them all  :lol:

This is pretty much the opposite of what is happening. It’s neocon nation who is calling Mitt a libdork.
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: sonofdaxjones on February 05, 2020, 02:15:07 PM
Ok, so why should we like Romney because of the way he half assed his way to 2008 and not because of his 2012 loss?

Because instead of fighting for his candidacy which was very viable based on his primary wins and finishes in others and he completely pussed out and endorsed McCain, all abut assuring Hope and Change would win. 



Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: sonofdaxjones on February 05, 2020, 02:16:37 PM
The fact that LibDork Nation is clearly on the verge (if they haven't already) of calling Mitt one of their own is the most LOL'able of them all  :lol:

This is pretty much the opposite of what is happening. It’s neocon nation who is calling Mitt a libdork.

First of all, NeoCon has been completely transferred over to the Dems who now fully endorse unilateral regime change and perpetual confrontation with Russia.   

Ever since Mitt came out strongly against Trump, LibDork Nation has been hanging on his scrot.

Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: LickNeckey on February 05, 2020, 02:19:02 PM
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2008_Republican_Party_presidential_primaries

Huckabee secured more delegates
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: chum1 on February 05, 2020, 02:19:45 PM
Reporters had already gathered for this and were told it was canceled. Obviously, because Trump is having a temper tantrum.

https://twitter.com/MichaelCBender/status/1225138521364738053
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: sonofdaxjones on February 05, 2020, 02:20:37 PM
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2008_Republican_Party_presidential_primaries

Huckabee secured more delegates

Thanks Capt. Obvious.

Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: star seed 7 on February 05, 2020, 02:22:25 PM
Thank you for being the perfect representive of the trump cult, disagree with trump and it's excommunicado libcuck!
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: Brock Landers on February 05, 2020, 02:26:52 PM
dax what does the "to" mean when you said "half assed his way to 2008"?  Most people would say he didn't actually get anywhere in 2008 as opposed to 2012 when, you know, he won his party's nomination. 
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: LickNeckey on February 05, 2020, 02:28:09 PM
he means that he got confused and is flailing
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: sonofdaxjones on February 05, 2020, 02:30:42 PM
Now you guys can't admit that you forgot Mitt ran in 2008.  SMDH

Mitt had every opportunity to be more forceful in 2008 and he blew it, he could have gone after McCain a lot harder and instead went with the "in the time of war" BS, like it was World War II again.



Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: Brock Landers on February 05, 2020, 02:37:24 PM
It's okay dax, put the Sharpie down and be honest with us.  I promise we're not mad at you.
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: sonofdaxjones on February 05, 2020, 02:39:37 PM
It's okay dax, put the Sharpie down and be honest with us.  I promise we're not mad at you.

It's okay Brock, you guys forget a lot of things and need a lot of things explained and re-explained.  The forgetfulness is derivative of the heavy  :bong: so I understand.

Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: chum1 on February 05, 2020, 03:37:53 PM
Romney is the first US Senator in American history to vote to remove a president of his own party

Also, first time in history that no one outside the president's own party voted not to remove.
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: sonofdaxjones on February 05, 2020, 04:06:32 PM
Guys some solid moral victories here.   Hang in there, Nancy, Jerry and the rest of your heroes are gonna try again.

I mean eff this leading and legislating stuff and doing the peoples business . . . we gotta get Trump because he won in 2016 and we've been  :curse: :curse: ever since.

Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: Brock Landers on February 05, 2020, 04:15:47 PM
Have fun being on the wrong side of history.
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: sonofdaxjones on February 05, 2020, 04:28:09 PM
 :lynchmob:
Have fun being on the wrong side of history.

What side is that?

Not on the side of a positively shitty impeachment attempt.

Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: DaBigTrain on February 05, 2020, 05:12:56 PM
Congrats everyone we have crowned a king

Don’t worry Da Big Dummy, Bernie’s already got an executive order list that’s only missing “dictator for life” and they’re just ironing out some wording on that one.

Liz is gonna toss all political opponents in jail, even if you were just some wonk paper pusher who worked on the same level as George Conway’s job offer, Liz is gonna prosecute your ass. 

She’s also gonna unilaterally declare people disinformation agents and prosecute them. What’s next?  The revival of Obama’s indefinite detention thought balloon? 

You’ll get your chance to put the Brownshirt and armband on again soon enough.  Keep those jackboots polished.

I didn’t even read Dax’s reply but the moment Trump is acquitted he posts this. Pretty Kingy to me as Dax continues his high step salute.

https://twitter.com/realdonaldtrump/status/1225174713992990721
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: catastrophe on February 05, 2020, 05:19:36 PM
TRUMPEEEE
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: chum1 on February 05, 2020, 05:25:06 PM
How long until all of them realize that Biden isn't the nominee?

https://twitter.com/kathrynw5/status/1225183166677299200
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: chum1 on February 05, 2020, 05:28:13 PM
I'm looking forward to a Trump/Sanders debate in which Trump repeatedly asks, "Where's Hunter? Where's Hunter Biden?"
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: catastrophe on February 05, 2020, 05:53:43 PM
There wouldn’t be a Trump/Sanders debate. I guess maybe if Trump was polling at like 20%.
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: sonofdaxjones on February 05, 2020, 05:55:09 PM
Congrats everyone we have crowned a king

Don’t worry Da Big Dummy, Bernie’s already got an executive order list that’s only missing “dictator for life” and they’re just ironing out some wording on that one.

Liz is gonna toss all political opponents in jail, even if you were just some wonk paper pusher who worked on the same level as George Conway’s job offer, Liz is gonna prosecute your ass. 

She’s also gonna unilaterally declare people disinformation agents and prosecute them. What’s next?  The revival of Obama’s indefinite detention thought balloon? 

You’ll get your chance to put the Brownshirt and armband on again soon enough.  Keep those jackboots polished.

I didn’t even read Dax’s reply but the moment Trump is acquitted he posts this. Pretty Kingy to me as Dax continues his high step salute.

https://twitter.com/realdonaldtrump/status/1225174713992990721

I know you're extremely dense, so you can't comprehend the tagline on Time's cover.

Oh buy hey, your guy was just joking about wanting to keep going, he wasn't being "kingy" he was just joking.

Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: sonofdaxjones on February 05, 2020, 05:56:55 PM
How long until all of them realize that Biden isn't the nominee?

https://twitter.com/kathrynw5/status/1225183166677299200

If Liz Warren actually believed her own bullshit, she'd be all for this.

Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: sys on February 05, 2020, 09:09:52 PM
mitt romney is a genuinely courageous patriot, and i appreciate it.  thank you, senator.
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: steve dave on February 05, 2020, 09:21:37 PM
How long until all of them realize that Biden isn't the nominee?

https://twitter.com/kathrynw5/status/1225183166677299200

Fox News still talks about the Uranium One fake scandal a minimum of 3 times a week. So my guess is never.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: wetwillie on February 05, 2020, 09:35:25 PM
Lmao he is probably going to withhold aid from Ukraine again. 
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: catastrophe on February 05, 2020, 11:30:53 PM
mitt romney is a genuinely courageous patriot, and i appreciate it.  thank you, senator.

Not entirely convinced courageous is the right word, but he’s definitely a guy with enough self respect that he’s not gonna get bullied by party leadership, and that means something.
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: sonofdaxjones on February 05, 2020, 11:41:43 PM
mitt romney is a genuinely courageous patriot, and i appreciate it.  thank you, senator.

Not entirely convinced courageous is the right word, but he’s definitely a guy with enough self respect that he’s not gonna get bullied by party leadership, and that means something.

Pay as little attention as possible to SysBot . . . he's a total whack-a-doo.

Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: sonofdaxjones on February 05, 2020, 11:57:07 PM
 :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

https://web.archive.org/web/20171107043544/https:/burisma-group.com/eng/

https://web.archive.org/web/20190425153112/https://burisma-group.com/eng/director/joseph-cofer-black/

From Wiki:

Mitt Romney presidential campaign

On April 26, 2007, Black was chosen by Mitt Romney, a Republican candidate in the 2008 United States presidential election, to head his counter-terrorism policy advisory group.[31]

In October 2011, Black was chosen by Romney to serve as "Special Adviser" on all foreign policy issues.[32]


Black worked for the CIA for years.

Oh Mitt . . .  :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: chum1 on February 06, 2020, 06:42:22 AM
I was wondering what any of this had to do with impeachment. Now I get it. It's payback time for dax and his fellow Trumpers.

https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/1225203837226700800
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: sonofdaxjones on February 06, 2020, 07:21:52 AM
Oh Chum . . .
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: chum1 on February 06, 2020, 07:29:31 AM
Oh Chum . . .

You're not fooling anyone except maybe yourself. You'll be voting for Trump.
Title: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: sonofdaxjones on February 06, 2020, 07:37:42 AM
Oh Chum . . .

You're not fooling anyone except maybe yourself. You'll be voting for Trump.

If you idiots nominate the super corrupt racist war monger, or one of the two complete whack jobs, you bet I’ll be voting for Trump.  But what does that have to do with Mitt trying to protect one of his own sitting on the board of Burisma?
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: star seed 7 on February 06, 2020, 07:40:45 AM
But you totally don't approve of trump and don't want him to run again  :lol:
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: steve dave on February 06, 2020, 07:43:28 AM
Listen, do i defend literally every single contemptible action of this objectively awful human being on this message board? Yes. But will I be voting for him? Also yes.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: sonofdaxjones on February 06, 2020, 07:50:51 AM
Lol, the vast majority of the time you guys are melting down about stuff that’s been going on since long before Trump came along.  But you didn’t pay any attention, didn’t care and you weren’t being fueled by people who are super pissed that Hillary “we came we saw he died” Clinton didn’t get elected. 

Now you’re super pissed that your heroes in the house did an amazingly shitty job trying to impeach Trump.

1200 plus days of rage and counting . . .

Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: waks on February 06, 2020, 08:24:14 AM
Oh Chum . . .

You're not fooling anyone except maybe yourself. You'll be voting for Trump.

If you idiots nominate the super corrupt racist war monger, or one of the two complete whack jobs, you bet I’ll be voting for Trump.  But what does that have to do with Mitt trying to protect one of his own sitting on the board of Burisma?
How is voting to remove Trump (an action that is not going to end with the desired result) going to protect his guy on the board of Burisma? It seems that it would more likely do the exact opposite.

Also, for clarification's sake, the whack jobs are Warren and Sanders? You would vote for Pete or Klo? Yeah, right
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: sonofdaxjones on February 06, 2020, 08:45:00 AM
Oh Chum . . .

You're not fooling anyone except maybe yourself. You'll be voting for Trump.

If you idiots nominate the super corrupt racist war monger, or one of the two complete whack jobs, you bet I’ll be voting for Trump.  But what does that have to do with Mitt trying to protect one of his own sitting on the board of Burisma?
How is voting to remove Trump (an action that is not going to end with the desired result) going to protect his guy on the board of Burisma? It seems that it would more likely do the exact opposite.

Also, for clarification's sake, the whack jobs are Warren and Sanders? You would vote for Pete or Klo? Yeah, right

I'll take the latter first.   I vote for Dems all the time, barring something very weird happening, Doug Jones has my vote . . . again (one example).   I voted for Walt Maddox for Gub. 

If Trump is out of office, there's a strong chance the questions about Burisma subside substantially.   

But I sure am glad that Mitt was so ardent about getting witnesses, because clearly he was on the fence. 
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: waks on February 06, 2020, 09:08:54 AM
Oh Chum . . .

You're not fooling anyone except maybe yourself. You'll be voting for Trump.

If you idiots nominate the super corrupt racist war monger, or one of the two complete whack jobs, you bet I’ll be voting for Trump.  But what does that have to do with Mitt trying to protect one of his own sitting on the board of Burisma?
How is voting to remove Trump (an action that is not going to end with the desired result) going to protect his guy on the board of Burisma? It seems that it would more likely do the exact opposite.

Also, for clarification's sake, the whack jobs are Warren and Sanders? You would vote for Pete or Klo? Yeah, right

I'll take the latter first.   I vote for Dems all the time, barring something very weird happening, Doug Jones has my vote . . . again (one example).   I voted for Walt Maddox for Gub. 

If Trump is out of office, there's a strong chance the questions about Burisma subside substantially.   

But I sure am glad that Mitt was so ardent about getting witnesses, because clearly he was on the fence.
But Romney obviously knew Trump wouldn't be removed from office. He had literally nothing to gain from voting to remove. And if he had such motivations, why would he only vote to remove on one of the articles and not the other?

Congrats on not voting for a sexual predator (for the Senate). You are aware that Jones voted to remove Trump, right?
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: bucket on February 06, 2020, 09:25:13 AM
I have a feeling this noon press conference is going to be batshit.
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: Rage Against the McKee on February 06, 2020, 09:27:01 AM
Listen, do i defend literally every single contemptible action of this objectively awful human being on this message board? Yes. But will I be voting for him? Also yes.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Whoa now. I won't vote for him on the off chance that none of the three current front runners end up with the nomination and also none of the incel or QAnon/Texags boards I frequent manage to give me any dirt on whoever ends up winning.
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: star seed 7 on February 06, 2020, 09:29:01 AM
Lol, just remembering when dax spent an entire special election shitting all over doug jones and calling him an out of touch Hollywood liberal. No one believes you will (or did) vote for him  :lol:
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: sonofdaxjones on February 06, 2020, 09:29:29 AM
Oh Chum . . .

You're not fooling anyone except maybe yourself. You'll be voting for Trump.

If you idiots nominate the super corrupt racist war monger, or one of the two complete whack jobs, you bet I’ll be voting for Trump.  But what does that have to do with Mitt trying to protect one of his own sitting on the board of Burisma?
How is voting to remove Trump (an action that is not going to end with the desired result) going to protect his guy on the board of Burisma? It seems that it would more likely do the exact opposite.

Also, for clarification's sake, the whack jobs are Warren and Sanders? You would vote for Pete or Klo? Yeah, right

I'll take the latter first.   I vote for Dems all the time, barring something very weird happening, Doug Jones has my vote . . . again (one example).   I voted for Walt Maddox for Gub. 

If Trump is out of office, there's a strong chance the questions about Burisma subside substantially.   

But I sure am glad that Mitt was so ardent about getting witnesses, because clearly he was on the fence.
But Romney obviously knew Trump wouldn't be removed from office. He had literally nothing to gain from voting to remove. And if he had such motivations, why would he only vote to remove on one of the articles and not the other?

Congrats on not voting for a sexual predator (for the Senate). You are aware that Jones voted to remove Trump, right?

Of course Jones voted to remove Trump.   But unlike the always enraged extremely low intelligence LibDorks around here, I can separate matters of national and local import and I feel like Doug Jones (even though he is a rich white gun loving lawyer who lives in Mountain Brook .. . . but that never bothers LibDork Nation cus for you it's all about the D) has been very good at his job.    I'll excuse the sexual predator remark even though LibDork Nation voted 63 million strong to put a known sexual predator and his enabling wife back inside the walls of the White House for a 3rd time

LOL, he had nothing to gain, good one Waks  :lol: :lol: :lol:
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: sonofdaxjones on February 06, 2020, 09:30:00 AM
Lol, just remembering when dax spent an entire special election shitting all over doug jones and calling him an out of touch Hollywood liberal. No one believes you will (or did) vote for him  :lol:

Link? 

I'll help you out LibDork.9, I made fun of Doug Jones because that period was another high point in LibDork Nation identity politics and Doug Jones was and is a rich white Mountain Brook living lawyer with a large gun collection.     

LibDork.9, always 4 laps down.

Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: waks on February 06, 2020, 09:32:59 AM
Oh Chum . . .

You're not fooling anyone except maybe yourself. You'll be voting for Trump.

If you idiots nominate the super corrupt racist war monger, or one of the two complete whack jobs, you bet I’ll be voting for Trump.  But what does that have to do with Mitt trying to protect one of his own sitting on the board of Burisma?
How is voting to remove Trump (an action that is not going to end with the desired result) going to protect his guy on the board of Burisma? It seems that it would more likely do the exact opposite.

Also, for clarification's sake, the whack jobs are Warren and Sanders? You would vote for Pete or Klo? Yeah, right

I'll take the latter first.   I vote for Dems all the time, barring something very weird happening, Doug Jones has my vote . . . again (one example).   I voted for Walt Maddox for Gub. 

If Trump is out of office, there's a strong chance the questions about Burisma subside substantially.   

But I sure am glad that Mitt was so ardent about getting witnesses, because clearly he was on the fence.
But Romney obviously knew Trump wouldn't be removed from office. He had literally nothing to gain from voting to remove. And if he had such motivations, why would he only vote to remove on one of the articles and not the other?

Congrats on not voting for a sexual predator (for the Senate). You are aware that Jones voted to remove Trump, right?

Of course Jones voted to remove Trump.   But unlike the always enraged extremely low intelligence LibDorks around here, I can separate matters of national and local import and I feel like Doug Jones (even though he is a rich white gun loving lawyer who lives in Mountain Brook .. . . but that never bothers LibDork Nation cus for you it's all about the D) has been very good at his job.    I'll excuse the sexual predator remark even though LibDork Nation voted 63 million strong to put a known sexual predator and his enabling wife back inside the walls of the White House for a 3rd time

LOL, he had nothing to gain, good one Waks  :lol: :lol: :lol:
What did he have to gain other than scorn from his party and why didn't he vote to remove on both articles?
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: sonofdaxjones on February 06, 2020, 09:33:41 AM
Oh Chum . . .

You're not fooling anyone except maybe yourself. You'll be voting for Trump.

If you idiots nominate the super corrupt racist war monger, or one of the two complete whack jobs, you bet I’ll be voting for Trump.  But what does that have to do with Mitt trying to protect one of his own sitting on the board of Burisma?
How is voting to remove Trump (an action that is not going to end with the desired result) going to protect his guy on the board of Burisma? It seems that it would more likely do the exact opposite.

Also, for clarification's sake, the whack jobs are Warren and Sanders? You would vote for Pete or Klo? Yeah, right

I'll take the latter first.   I vote for Dems all the time, barring something very weird happening, Doug Jones has my vote . . . again (one example).   I voted for Walt Maddox for Gub. 

If Trump is out of office, there's a strong chance the questions about Burisma subside substantially.   

But I sure am glad that Mitt was so ardent about getting witnesses, because clearly he was on the fence.
But Romney obviously knew Trump wouldn't be removed from office. He had literally nothing to gain from voting to remove. And if he had such motivations, why would he only vote to remove on one of the articles and not the other?

Congrats on not voting for a sexual predator (for the Senate). You are aware that Jones voted to remove Trump, right?

Of course Jones voted to remove Trump.   But unlike the always enraged extremely low intelligence LibDorks around here, I can separate matters of national and local import and I feel like Doug Jones (even though he is a rich white gun loving lawyer who lives in Mountain Brook .. . . but that never bothers LibDork Nation cus for you it's all about the D) has been very good at his job.    I'll excuse the sexual predator remark even though LibDork Nation voted 63 million strong to put a known sexual predator and his enabling wife back inside the walls of the White House for a 3rd time

LOL, he had nothing to gain, good one Waks  :lol: :lol: :lol:
What did he have to gain other than scorn from his party?

Are Mitt's presidential aspirations over? 
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: Rage Against the McKee on February 06, 2020, 09:36:13 AM
I think this helps Mitt if Trump loses reelection. It's very possible it was a calculated vote playing the odds that Trump won't win. He's not the sort of person who is going to remain popular as a loser.
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: bucket on February 06, 2020, 09:37:09 AM
I think this helps Mitt if Trump loses reelection. It's very possible it was a calculated vote playing the odds that Trump won't win. He's not the sort of person who is going to remain popular as a loser.

I don't believe Mittens is going to run in 2024.
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: Rage Against the McKee on February 06, 2020, 09:38:06 AM
I think this helps Mitt if Trump loses reelection. It's very possible it was a calculated vote playing the odds that Trump won't win. He's not the sort of person who is going to remain popular as a loser.

I don't believe Mittens is going to run in 2024.

He really shouldn't, but every other viable candidate seems to belong in the nursing home, so it wouldn't be surprising.
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: steve dave on February 06, 2020, 09:38:58 AM
Self serving Mitt voting to impeach a republican president as a senator from an overwhelmingly republican state. This is the dumbest talking point I’ve heard today and Dax has posted like 40 times.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: sonofdaxjones on February 06, 2020, 09:43:11 AM


Self serving Mitt voting to impeach a republican president as a senator from an overwhelmingly republican state. This is the dumbest talking point I’ve heard today and Dax has posted like 40 times.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Not even close to the scrot hanging LibDork Nation is doing on Mitt and the talk about how Mitt is his own man.   It's positively  :lol:

So, looking down the list of people LibDork Nation used to hate that now love . . .


(Number 9,576 since November 2016) John Bolton

(New Entry, Number 9,577 since November 2016) Mitt Romney
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: catastrophe on February 06, 2020, 09:57:17 AM
Mitt really doesn’t need the job. I think it’s pretty obvious he voted to convict because he cared about being on the right side of history.
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: sonofdaxjones on February 06, 2020, 09:59:21 AM
Mitt really doesn’t need the job. I think it’s pretty obvious he voted to convict because he cared about being on the right side of history.

Okay . . .  :lol:

Well one of the right sides of history that a long time Romneiac (and former CIA Agent . . . the Mormons and the CIA, a match made in Mormon heaven) sits on the board of directors of Burisma . . . a very corrupt Ukranian energy company.

Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: catastrophe on February 06, 2020, 10:00:28 AM
Dax is so broken he doesn’t understand how two people can have agreeing viewpoints if they’re from different parties.
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: sonofdaxjones on February 06, 2020, 10:01:44 AM
Dax is so broken he doesn’t understand how two people can have agreeing viewpoints if they’re from different parties.

catastrophe is so obtuse that he actually believes that Mitt Romney voted because of his ideals.

Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: catastrophe on February 06, 2020, 10:01:57 AM
Mitt really doesn’t need the job. I think it’s pretty obvious he voted to convict because he cared about being on the right side of history.

Okay . . .  :lol:

Well one of the right sides of history that a long time Romneiac (and former CIA Agent . . . the Mormons and the CIA, a match made in Morman heaven) sits on the board of directors of Burisma . . . a very corrupt Ukranian energy company.

What’s the implication here? He cast a completely futile vote to convict as part of a cover up?
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: sonofdaxjones on February 06, 2020, 10:05:17 AM
Mitt really doesn’t need the job. I think it’s pretty obvious he voted to convict because he cared about being on the right side of history.

Okay . . .  :lol:

Well one of the right sides of history that a long time Romneiac (and former CIA Agent . . . the Mormons and the CIA, a match made in Morman heaven) sits on the board of directors of Burisma . . . a very corrupt Ukranian energy company.

What’s the implication here? He cast a completely futile vote to convict as part of a cover up?

Oh cat . . . don't be a simpleton.



Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: star seed 7 on February 06, 2020, 10:58:38 AM
Lol, just remembering when dax spent an entire special election shitting all over doug jones and calling him an out of touch Hollywood liberal. No one believes you will (or did) vote for him  :lol:

Link? 

I'll help you out LibDork.9, I made fun of Doug Jones because that period was another high point in LibDork Nation identity politics and Doug Jones was and is a rich white Mountain Brook living lawyer with a large gun collection.     

LibDork.9, always 4 laps down.

So is doug jones a homegrown racist or a transplant racist?

The darling of the DNC and Hollywood.
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: bucket on February 06, 2020, 11:32:42 AM
I have a feeling this noon press conference is going to be batshit.

Lots of adlibbing
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: chum1 on February 06, 2020, 12:25:27 PM
I was wondering what any of this had to do with impeachment. Now I get it. It's payback time for dax and his fellow Trumpers.

https://twitter.com/jdawsey1/status/1225484708705898496

2008 or 2012?
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: LickNeckey on February 06, 2020, 12:26:37 PM
obvs talking about 2008

finishing third to Huckabee is a rough riding embarassment
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: waks on February 06, 2020, 12:35:03 PM
Mitt really doesn’t need the job. I think it’s pretty obvious he voted to convict because he cared about being on the right side of history.

Okay . . .  :lol:

Well one of the right sides of history that a long time Romneiac (and former CIA Agent . . . the Mormons and the CIA, a match made in Morman heaven) sits on the board of directors of Burisma . . . a very corrupt Ukranian energy company.

What’s the implication here? He cast a completely futile vote to convict as part of a cover up?

Oh cat . . . don't be a simpleton.
Just answer the question. You've dodged it twice.
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: sonofdaxjones on February 06, 2020, 01:34:34 PM
Lol, just remembering when dax spent an entire special election shitting all over doug jones and calling him an out of touch Hollywood liberal. No one believes you will (or did) vote for him  :lol:

Link? 

I'll help you out LibDork.9, I made fun of Doug Jones because that period was another high point in LibDork Nation identity politics and Doug Jones was and is a rich white Mountain Brook living lawyer with a large gun collection.     

LibDork.9, always 4 laps down.

So is doug jones a homegrown racist or a transplant racist?

The darling of the DNC and Hollywood.

I know you’re not smart, but crap tons of money was flowing in from Hollywood to his campaign.   So discussing reality isn’t shitting on anybody or anything.   

C for effort, solid F for execution. 
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: LickNeckey on February 06, 2020, 01:44:26 PM
Mitt really doesn’t need the job. I think it’s pretty obvious he voted to convict because he cared about being on the right side of history.

Okay . . .  :lol:

Well one of the right sides of history that a long time Romneiac (and former CIA Agent . . . the Mormons and the CIA, a match made in Morman heaven) sits on the board of directors of Burisma . . . a very corrupt Ukranian energy company.

What’s the implication here? He cast a completely futile vote to convict as part of a cover up?

Oh cat . . . don't be a simpleton.
Just answer the question. You've dodged it twice.

good luck with that...
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: catastrophe on February 06, 2020, 02:10:46 PM
I’m pretty sure Dax thinks Mitt is just jealous of Kellyanne’s success.
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: ChiComCat on February 06, 2020, 02:29:00 PM
Utah has been unusually tepid on Trump considering how GOP the state typically is.  I'd imagine Romney feels like he can more safely survive the vote than other GOP senators.

A quick google just now indicates Utah is coming around on Trump recently so we'll have to see if it hurts him.
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: star seed 7 on February 06, 2020, 02:36:21 PM
Romney doesn't run again until 2024 and is a god in Utah, he'll be just fine electorally. Sounds like his niece is no longer allowed to speak to him though.
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: Rage Against the McKee on February 06, 2020, 02:39:21 PM
Plus Mitt will be 76 years old in 2024 and senators serve 6 year terms. Running for president seems more likely.
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: Spracne on February 06, 2020, 02:44:38 PM
Plus Mitt will be 76 years old in 2024 and senators serve 6 year terms. Running for president seems more likely.

Mitt Romney is an ageless wonder and will probably live past 100, barring an accidental death situation. He looks exactly the same as he did 20 years ago. Mormons and clean livin' and whatnot.
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: catastrophe on February 06, 2020, 02:51:27 PM
I like Mitt. I thought he was the wrong candidate to run against Obama in 2008, though.
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: waks on February 06, 2020, 03:15:17 PM
I like Mitt. I thought he was the wrong candidate to run against Obama in 2008, though.
  :D
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: sonofdaxjones on February 06, 2020, 10:03:41 PM
Mitt really doesn’t need the job. I think it’s pretty obvious he voted to convict because he cared about being on the right side of history.

Okay . . .  :lol:

Well one of the right sides of history that a long time Romneiac (and former CIA Agent . . . the Mormons and the CIA, a match made in Morman heaven) sits on the board of directors of Burisma . . . a very corrupt Ukranian energy company.

What’s the implication here? He cast a completely futile vote to convict as part of a cover up?

Oh cat . . . don't be a simpleton.
Just answer the question. You've dodged it twice.

You're a rolling ball of rage  :curse:

Yeah, I think Mitt his former campaign guy (ex-CIA), Biden, Kerry were up to no good in the Ukraine with Burisma and funding from either the U.S. or the IMF, if not both.   

Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: waks on February 07, 2020, 02:11:16 AM
Lol, you think. That still doesn't explain why he would cast a futile vote but hey, at least you tried to answer the question.
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: LickNeckey on February 07, 2020, 07:27:54 AM
Dax I feel it would be appropriate for you to use the term cabal more frequently.
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: chum1 on February 07, 2020, 07:41:07 AM
 :love:

one is an act of a war mongering junta of which the Democratic party turned out 63 million strong and tried to keep them in the White House and this time around another member of the cabal is the democratic front runner.
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: star seed 7 on February 07, 2020, 07:47:20 AM
Also use coffers more
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: sonofdaxjones on February 07, 2020, 08:03:22 AM
Lol, you think. That still doesn't explain why he would cast a futile vote but hey, at least you tried to answer the question.

You’ve done zero research and only know what LibDerp Leadership tells you to think.



Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: chum1 on February 07, 2020, 08:11:48 AM
I completely agree on "cabal" and "coffers." What I'd like to see from dax is less Alex Jones and more Steve Bannon.
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: sonofdaxjones on February 07, 2020, 08:49:28 AM
I completely agree on "cabal" and "coffers." What I'd like to see from dax is less Alex Jones and more Steve Bannon.

The resident expert on Alex Jones is LibDork.9


But this is like rapid fire tap outs. 
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: waks on February 07, 2020, 09:48:45 AM
Lol, you think. That still doesn't explain why he would cast a futile vote but hey, at least you tried to answer the question.

You’ve done zero research and only know what LibDerp Leadership tells you to think.
You can't answer a simple question and your research consists of whack-a-do (to borrow a phrase) conspiracy blogs and tweets.
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: sonofdaxjones on February 07, 2020, 11:23:00 AM
Lol, you think. That still doesn't explain why he would cast a futile vote but hey, at least you tried to answer the question.

You’ve done zero research and only know what LibDerp Leadership tells you to think.
You can't answer a simple question and your research consists of whack-a-do (to borrow a phrase) conspiracy blogs and tweets.



Just let the fact that one of Romney's top advisors is on the Burisma Board of Directors sink in for awhile.  Of course, you wouldn't have the first clue that was the case unless I told you.

So, you continue rage on in your constant state of being clueless, and the conspiracy tap out is way over used around here, find something new.





Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: catastrophe on February 07, 2020, 11:29:19 AM
This is reminiscent of “quite the pickle” gate
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: waks on February 07, 2020, 02:35:46 PM
Lol, you think. That still doesn't explain why he would cast a futile vote but hey, at least you tried to answer the question.

You’ve done zero research and only know what LibDerp Leadership tells you to think.
You can't answer a simple question and your research consists of whack-a-do (to borrow a phrase) conspiracy blogs and tweets.



Just let the fact that one of Romney's top advisors is on the Burisma Board of Directors sink in for awhile.  Of course, you wouldn't have the first clue that was the case unless I told you.

So, you continue rage on in your constant state of being clueless, and the conspiracy tap out is way over used around here, find something new.
:lol: :lol: :lol: Still Won't Answer The Question  :lol: :lol: :lol:
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: steve dave on February 07, 2020, 03:24:39 PM
Jesus Christ


https://twitter.com/peterbakernyt/status/1225887627603333127


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: sonofdaxjones on February 07, 2020, 03:29:54 PM
Good, if Vindman has been engaged in Ukrainian policy for as long as he claims then he knew full well the previous administration was installing new Ukrainian leadership with the help of Nazi oriented para-military forces.

Should have been fired a long time ago.
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: Brock Landers on February 07, 2020, 04:23:18 PM
Yeah, Trump is DRAINING THE SWAMP just like he said he would you stupid libtards!
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: Rage Against the McKee on February 07, 2020, 04:27:20 PM
Any other fascist dictator would have done the same. What did you guys expect?
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: sonofdaxjones on February 07, 2020, 04:30:55 PM
Weird responses from dudes who supported an administration who destroyed real whistleblowers and who weren't people who ignored the chain of command and directly circumvented the policies of the president by concerting with a foreign country.   

I'll take sedition for $1000 Alex

Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: Brock Landers on February 07, 2020, 04:32:51 PM
Oh Trump also said that his impeachment should be expunged.  Totally normal.  That's just the first step towards him claiming it never even happened.  Seriously, he will end up saying this at the Republican convention this summer.
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: sonofdaxjones on February 07, 2020, 04:33:37 PM
Oh Trump also said that his impeachment should be expunged.  Totally normal.  That's just the first step towards him claiming it never even happened.  Seriously, he will end up saying this at the Republican convention this summer.

That's fantastic. 

Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: Brock Landers on February 07, 2020, 04:37:27 PM
Oh Trump also said that his impeachment should be expunged.  Totally normal.  That's just the first step towards him claiming it never even happened.  Seriously, he will end up saying this at the Republican convention this summer.

That's fantastic.

You're right, it's so fantastic he won't be able to wait until the summer to bust it out.  He just floated it out there today so it needs about a week or so to marinate.
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: sonofdaxjones on February 07, 2020, 04:48:07 PM
Oh Trump also said that his impeachment should be expunged.  Totally normal.  That's just the first step towards him claiming it never even happened.  Seriously, he will end up saying this at the Republican convention this summer.

That's fantastic.

You're right, it's so fantastic he won't be able to wait until the summer to bust it out.  He just floated it out there today so it needs about a week or so to marinate.

So, throw another 10 megatons on the rage meter??

Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: gatoveintisiete on February 07, 2020, 04:48:17 PM
wait, do people really think something happened?
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: 8manpick on February 07, 2020, 05:47:08 PM
Sondland is gone
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: Institutional Control on February 07, 2020, 07:29:41 PM
Vindman’s brother got canned too? Goodness.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: DaBigTrain on February 07, 2020, 07:32:35 PM
wait, do people really think something happened?

Something did happen but he’s really good at convincing stupid Trumpers that nothing did happen :dunno:
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: tdaver on February 07, 2020, 09:16:23 PM
Plus Mitt will be 76 years old in 2024 and senators serve 6 year terms. Running for president seems more likely.

Mitt Romney is an ageless wonder and will probably live past 100, barring an accidental death situation. He looks exactly the same as he did 20 years ago. Mormons and clean livin' and whatnot.

Now we know what they’re doing with the $100 billion!  Keeping the white horse dream alive.

(https://uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/20200208/986c93f12852e85973ec806c1e11e5e4.gif)
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: sonofdaxjones on February 07, 2020, 10:40:14 PM
Vindman’s brother got canned too? Goodness.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Sedition shouldn't pay . . .
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: waks on February 08, 2020, 08:51:24 AM
Vindman’s brother got canned too? Goodness.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Totally normal
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: Institutional Control on February 08, 2020, 08:59:48 AM
Vindman’s brother got canned too? Goodness.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Sedition shouldn't pay . . .
I guess I missed what his brother said.  Do you have a link?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: sonofdaxjones on February 08, 2020, 09:04:52 AM
Really surprised by the reaction from guys who fully supported the previous administration who crushed real whistle blowers. 

Who were blowing the whistle on real crimes and not ignoring the chain of command and not practicing their own foreign policy (and who didn’t enable Neo Nazi elements in regime change). 

But mega hyper partisan LibDorks gonna mega hyper partisan. 

SMDH

Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: Institutional Control on February 08, 2020, 09:06:28 AM
So, Alexander Vindman’s brother did what wrong?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: DaBigTrain on February 08, 2020, 10:21:09 AM
Told the truth.
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: sonofdaxjones on February 08, 2020, 10:33:15 AM
Told the truth.

 :lol: :lol: :lol:

Underlings don't get to conduct their own foreign policy.

But not surprising Da Big Psycho, well known Lib Brownshirt would support a holdover from an administration that used Neo-Nazi's to install a government in the Ukraine.

Birds of feather and all that . . .

Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: Rage Against the McKee on February 08, 2020, 12:19:14 PM
Dax must feel really bad about all of those Nazis who got punished for following their chain of command.
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: star seed 7 on February 08, 2020, 01:31:53 PM
The cult will not allow telling of the truth, it's very dangerous
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: Dugout DickStone on February 08, 2020, 03:20:26 PM
So did trump just learn about the neo-nazi Ukraine gov thing Thursday? 
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: steve dave on February 10, 2020, 07:40:09 AM
Check this out

https://twitter.com/joshtpm/status/1226583703146713089


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: catastrophe on February 10, 2020, 07:55:33 AM
Sometimes when the executive and judicial branches try to go after the president for things he said he did, it is the duty of the legislature to give him unchecked powers.
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: sonofdaxjones on February 10, 2020, 11:11:08 AM
About the only unchecked power I saw in any of this is a former VPOTUS of the United State bragging about getting someone fired in the Ukraine (and that person getting fired while basically being told the VPOTUS told he bosses to fire him).



Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: Katpappy on February 10, 2020, 10:46:16 PM
Check this out
https://twitter.com/joshtpm/status/1226583703146713089


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

He's not only a lying eff, but definably a dumb eff.   :buh-bye:
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: chum1 on January 07, 2021, 01:07:55 PM
bump
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: Sandstone Outcropping on January 07, 2021, 01:21:26 PM
bump
What are the possible scenarios here?
1. Immediate resignation and return to Mar A Lago
2. Impeachment (would take too long, they say)
3. 25th Amendment (could send maga into more violent frenzy-ing)
4. Cross fingers and hope there are no crises that would require attention from a rational human between now and Inauguration Day

Option 1 seems like a best-case scenario??
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: Rage Against the McKee on January 07, 2021, 01:29:24 PM
They aren't required to have an impeachment trial. Just impeach, send it to the senate, and let them vote. Get the senators who support treason on record.
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: Gooch on January 07, 2021, 01:29:47 PM
4 is what is going to happen.
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: Gooch on January 07, 2021, 01:30:45 PM
They aren't required to have an impeachment trial. Just impeach, send it to the senate, and let them vote. Get the senators who support treason on record.
7 of them already are.
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: CHONGS on January 07, 2021, 01:31:06 PM
Waste of time

Sent from my Pixel 4 using Tapatalk

Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: 8manpick on January 07, 2021, 01:38:14 PM
They were going to be in recess right? May as well impeach him again!
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: 8manpick on January 07, 2021, 01:38:39 PM
Has anyone ever gone for a twofer?
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: Rage Against the McKee on January 07, 2021, 01:40:10 PM
Waste of time

Sent from my Pixel 4 using Tapatalk

Not like they have anything better to do.
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: steve dave on January 07, 2021, 01:45:05 PM
Waste of time

Sent from my Pixel 4 using Tapatalk
Yes. Should censure and mute him. Do what the social media platforms have done but irl until the finish line.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: WildcatNkilt on January 07, 2021, 01:47:21 PM
Which one says FU to MAGA the hardest?
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: Sandstone Outcropping on January 07, 2021, 01:49:54 PM
Which one says FU to MAGA the hardest?
25th Amendment
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: MadCat on January 07, 2021, 01:53:29 PM
I think impeachment would prevent him from holding public office in the future, for what it's worth.
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: chum1 on January 07, 2021, 01:56:33 PM
I don't know why non-MAGA pubs wouldn't want to prevent him from running in the future.
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: Rage Against the McKee on January 07, 2021, 01:56:54 PM
I think impeachment would prevent him from holding public office in the future, for what it's worth.

His poor physical condition will do that all on its own, anyway.
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: cfbandyman on January 07, 2021, 02:13:42 PM
I think impeachment would prevent him from holding public office in the future, for what it's worth.

His poor physical condition will do that all on its own, anyway.

Sure, but belts and suspenders this just to make sure
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: sys on January 07, 2021, 02:18:53 PM
if there are enough republican senators willing to convict him now, then impeach him asap.  no need to impeach him in the house just for show, though.
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: star seed 7 on January 07, 2021, 02:22:36 PM
If you can't get this president removed via impeachment, then the process is essentially useless
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: SkinnyBenny on January 07, 2021, 02:47:37 PM
Same for the 25th.


And yeah, to me impeachment seems like a no brainer for Republicans to back this time around.

1) It would prevent him from holding public office and therefore they could go into 2024 without having to worry about him blustering about potentially making a run at it. For the record I don't think he will actually run, but if he's still legally allowed to he'll talk it up for years and at the very least keep it up for the grift. If Trump is prevented from ever running again due to impeachment and conviction in the senate, all the 'pubs who have presidential ambitions could make a clean break from Trumpism and throw their hat in the ring without actually having to worry much about making MAGAs mad.
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: ChiComCat on January 07, 2021, 02:53:02 PM
Same for the 25th.


And yeah, to me impeachment seems like a no brainer for Republicans to back this time around.

1) It would prevent him from holding public office and therefore they could go into 2024 without having to worry about him blustering about potentially making a run at it. For the record I don't think he will actually run, but if he's still legally allowed to he'll talk it up for years and at the very least keep it up for the grift. If Trump is prevented from ever running again due to impeachment and conviction in the senate, all the 'pubs who have presidential ambitions could make a clean break from Trumpism and throw their hat in the ring without actually having to worry much about making MAGAs mad.

I think they'll still be courting MAGAs but it is good not having to run against Trump with an established base that's far more loyal to him than the party.
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: steve dave on January 07, 2021, 03:17:39 PM
https://twitter.com/danabashcnn/status/1347289959577825280


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: Rage Against the McKee on January 07, 2021, 03:19:51 PM
if there are enough republican senators willing to convict him now, then impeach him asap.  no need to impeach him in the house just for show, though.

I personally would like to see my senators put on the record. I'm all but certain that Marshall would vote against removal, but I'm curious about Moran.
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: Gooch on January 07, 2021, 03:20:46 PM
https://twitter.com/danabashcnn/status/1347289959577825280


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
How brave he is now.
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: CHONGS on January 07, 2021, 03:21:10 PM
if there are enough republican senators willing to convict him now, then impeach him asap.  no need to impeach him in the house just for show, though.
We all know there isn't, so it's pointless.

Sent from my Pixel 4 using Tapatalk

Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: Rage Against the McKee on January 07, 2021, 03:21:49 PM
Also, I would like to see Ben Sasse vote against removal and embarrass steve dave.
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: steve dave on January 07, 2021, 03:26:10 PM
Also, I would like to see Ben Sasse vote against removal and embarrass steve dave.
Why would you say something so hurtful?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: sys on January 07, 2021, 03:27:25 PM
Also, I would like to see Ben Sasse vote against removal and embarrass steve dave.

i would like to see that too, actually.
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: CHONGS on January 07, 2021, 03:28:19 PM
It's ironic, sd voted for a guy who voted against during the impeachment, and dax voted for the guy who voted to convict. 

What a world
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: Cire on January 07, 2021, 03:28:56 PM
Sasse would absolutely go against it on the grounds of "we need to heal, not be vengeful", "Rake you neighbors leaves"
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: Rage Against the McKee on January 07, 2021, 03:29:17 PM
It's sort of win-win because Sasse will cast his vote for however most of the other republicans vote.
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: steve dave on January 07, 2021, 03:42:31 PM
You guys are pissing me off


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: MakeItRain on January 07, 2021, 05:12:37 PM
I think impeachment would prevent him from holding public office in the future, for what it's worth.

I don't think this is true given he's already been impeached.
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: star seed 7 on January 07, 2021, 05:18:04 PM
I think impeachment would prevent him from holding public office in the future, for what it's worth.

I don't think this is true given he's already been impeached.

It can be a condition of conviction
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: chum1 on January 07, 2021, 05:39:21 PM
Fire up those papers.

https://twitter.com/grace_panetta/status/1347314570638012416
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: steve dave on January 07, 2021, 06:12:19 PM
lmao, what a scoop. Real breaking news there.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: Rage Against the McKee on January 07, 2021, 06:45:23 PM
A lot of reports were saying that Pence is pretty pissed off at Trump, so it's probably worth reporting that he's still too big of a pussy to make himself President over the whole thing.
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: Phil Titola on January 07, 2021, 06:52:51 PM
For 13 days.
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: catastrophe on January 07, 2021, 06:58:43 PM
A lot of reports were saying that Pence is pretty pissed off at Trump, so it's probably worth reporting that he's still too big of a pussy to make himself President over the whole thing.
It’s not a scoop because even if Pence really was on board with invoking the 25th he’d say the same thing.

It’s just like an AD saying they have no plans to replace the coach.
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: chum1 on January 08, 2021, 06:52:26 AM
https://twitter.com/JohnBerman/status/1347523188721393666
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: star seed 7 on January 08, 2021, 07:06:38 AM
 :jerk:
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: waks on January 08, 2021, 07:25:25 AM
Why wait?
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: catastrophe on January 08, 2021, 07:39:00 AM
Procedure stuff I’m guessing
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: Gooch on January 08, 2021, 08:13:42 AM
Mr. Kellyanne Conway says 67 Senators are on board so far. This could happen if the turtle will let it.
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: passranch on January 08, 2021, 10:34:50 AM
Mr. Kellyanne Conway says 67 Senators are on board so far. This could happen if the turtle will let it.

Narrator:  "He won't"
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: chum1 on January 08, 2021, 10:45:07 AM
https://twitter.com/rgoodlaw/status/1347542947580010498
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: Rage Against the McKee on January 08, 2021, 10:51:37 AM
Mr. Kellyanne Conway says 67 Senators are on board so far. This could happen if the turtle will let it.

Narrator:  "He won't"

I'm pretty sure the turtle will be one of the 67.
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: catastrophe on January 08, 2021, 10:59:20 AM
https://twitter.com/rgoodlaw/status/1347542947580010498
Assuming I’m inferring correctly from that tweet, what a juicy scenario.
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: chum1 on January 08, 2021, 11:01:37 AM
It seems like pubs would find it easier to convict if they're not also removing him from office.
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: Sandstone Outcropping on January 08, 2021, 11:03:46 AM
https://twitter.com/rgoodlaw/status/1347542947580010498
Crosspost to truth and reconciliation thread
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: catastrophe on January 08, 2021, 11:03:46 AM
Also I’ve decided impeachment is definitely worthwhile, even if only to have the articles passed and the prospect of a quick removal vote hanging over Trump’s head the final weeks.
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: Phil Titola on January 08, 2021, 11:07:17 AM
Also I’ve decided impeachment is definitely worthwhile, even if only to have the articles passed and the prospect of a quick removal vote hanging over Trump’s head the final weeks.

pro-impeachment for this as much as COVID.  I want congress on the record.
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: waks on January 08, 2021, 11:46:41 AM
Yeah, it would be nice to have an actual record of which Senators will officially recognize that Trump is a deranged lunatic that tried to overthrow a fair election by sending a mob of incels to storm the Capitol.
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: Rage Against the McKee on January 08, 2021, 11:51:50 AM
Yeah, it would be nice to have an actual record of which Senators will officially recognize that Trump is a deranged lunatic that tried to overthrow a fair election by sending a mob of incels to storm the Capitol.

They all realize that. The vote would be to see which senators and representatives also believe the government should be overthrown.
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: waks on January 08, 2021, 11:52:55 AM
Yeah I'm not really sure how what I'm saying is different from what you're saying.  :cheers:
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: MakeItRain on January 08, 2021, 12:21:06 PM
Wonder if Republicans in Congress now see an incentive to bar Trump from future office (obvi some individuals will) aside from you know doing the right thing for the country.

I keep seeing this but I haven't seen anything indicating that this is an actual thing that's possible.
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: MadCat on January 08, 2021, 12:32:30 PM
Wonder if Republicans in Congress now see an incentive to bar Trump from future office (obvi some individuals will) aside from you know doing the right thing for the country.

I keep seeing this but I haven't seen anything indicating that this is an actual thing that's possible.

I think this link talks about it: https://constitution.congress.gov/browse/essay/artI-S3-C7-1-2/ALDE_00000701/ (https://constitution.congress.gov/browse/essay/artI-S3-C7-1-2/ALDE_00000701/)
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: chum1 on January 08, 2021, 01:18:51 PM
Why wait?

Giving other two options time to play out.

https://twitter.com/DanaBashCNN/status/1347611157415292931

https://twitter.com/AdamSchiff/status/1347591837666615296

https://twitter.com/mkraju/status/1347595720128405505
Title: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: steve dave on January 08, 2021, 01:25:29 PM
I mean, getting trump away from any sort of power or even limelight is objectively positive for the country.  But, as a solely Dem strategy play, they probably want him running roughshod over the GOP more rather than less over the next 4 years.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: steve dave on January 08, 2021, 03:22:20 PM
https://twitter.com/nbcnews/status/1347651887764557826


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: Phil Titola on January 08, 2021, 03:46:17 PM
One pager. Just screenshots of his tweets.
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: michigancat on January 08, 2021, 03:59:16 PM
I mean, getting trump away from any sort of power or even limelight is objectively positive for the country.  But, as a solely Dem strategy play, they probably want him running roughshod over the GOP more rather than less over the next 4 years.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

well this was kind of the thought process a bunch of dems had when he was running way back in 2015.
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: sonofdaxjones on January 08, 2021, 04:11:25 PM
The funniest narrative of all are those who continue on with the Coup talk. 

It’s unnerving to see such a lack of intellect.
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: steve dave on January 08, 2021, 04:12:14 PM
I mean, getting trump away from any sort of power or even limelight is objectively positive for the country.  But, as a solely Dem strategy play, they probably want him running roughshod over the GOP more rather than less over the next 4 years.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

well this was kind of the thought process a bunch of dems had when he was running way back in 2015.
Yeah, that was the sowing stage


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: Phil Titola on January 08, 2021, 04:16:57 PM
The funniest narrative of all are those who continue on with the Coup talk. 

It’s unnerving to see such a lack of intellect.

Question for you Dax as you are closer to these people than I. 

What do you think those who breached the US capitol with zip ties on them trying to find Pelosi/Schumer were?  The maced lady literally said "This was a revolution"

TIA for your non-response
Title: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: Cire on January 08, 2021, 04:18:15 PM
Not a coup when it doesn’t  work

Check mate


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: sonofdaxjones on January 08, 2021, 04:20:04 PM
The funniest narrative of all are those who continue on with the Coup talk. 

It’s unnerving to see such a lack of intellect.

Question for you Dax as you are closer to these people than I. 

What do you think those who breached the US capitol with zip ties on them trying to find Pelosi/Schumer were?  The maced lady literally said "This was a revolution"

TIA for your non-response

Don't have the first clue, Phil.   I barely paid attention until I noticed that all the ProgLibs were having a total meltdown on social media.  Edit:  That should be:   A bigger meltdown than the normal 24/7/365 meltdown that's spanned the last 4 years. 

I don't think you understand how much I'm looking forward to that mentally incapacitated old man taking over the reigns of this country for a few months.




Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: Phil Titola on January 08, 2021, 04:22:22 PM
Yeah it wasn't really a big deal until social media ProgLibs made it such a big deal.  Good point.
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: sonofdaxjones on January 08, 2021, 04:23:10 PM
Yeah it wasn't really a big deal until social media ProgLibs made it such a big deal.  Good point.

I wasn't watching any of it, Phil.

So take your little passive aggressive rage out and move on.

Title: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: catastrophe on January 08, 2021, 04:24:04 PM
If true, that is horrifying that Dax’s information bubble did not include an event that was breaking news in basically every country in the world.
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: sonofdaxjones on January 08, 2021, 04:24:44 PM
If true, that is horrifying that Dax’s information bubble does not include an event that was breaking news in basically every country in the world.

Your inability to comprehend and follow along still to this day, just astounds me.

Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: star seed 7 on January 08, 2021, 04:28:12 PM
If true, that is horrifying that Dax’s information bubble did not include an event that was breaking news in basically every country in the world.

It would be, but he's lying again. He does this "never even heard about it" routine for anything that makes Trump look bad. He also claimed to have no idea about trump clearing out protesters for the bible photo op.
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: sonofdaxjones on January 08, 2021, 04:33:12 PM
If true, that is horrifying that Dax’s information bubble did not include an event that was breaking news in basically every country in the world.

It would be, but he's lying again. He does this "never even heard about it" routine for anything that makes Trump look bad. He also claimed to have no idea about trump clearing out protesters for the bible photo op.

Another person who consistently shows an amazing inability to comprehend and understand is Rainman.7.   

I don't even know what you're talking about relative to the bible photo vis-a-vis me saying I've never heard of it. 

Just more made up BS from the board super weirdo.

A person saying that didn't pay attention to something is an overt acknowledgement that they were aware of something but did not give it any attention.  In this case, I paid no attention until the Capital thing. 

Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: steve dave on January 08, 2021, 05:13:17 PM
https://twitter.com/kylegriffin1/status/1347659897328992257
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: Sandstone Outcropping on January 08, 2021, 05:15:14 PM
https://twitter.com/JohnBerman/status/1347523188721393666
Great chance for our new crop of KS House Reps to distinguish themselves.

 :billdance:
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: sys on January 08, 2021, 07:47:57 PM
these actually seem like good concrete reasons to proceed with impeachment (assuming it is something with a chance of succeeding), apart from the messaging component.

https://twitter.com/johnlk_80/status/1347717269682597888
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: wetwillie on January 08, 2021, 07:53:03 PM
Can we execute him?
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: chum1 on January 08, 2021, 08:09:49 PM
https://twitter.com/seungminkim/status/1347722877521567747
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: Trim on January 08, 2021, 08:21:07 PM
To the extent any of this would delay how soon all of us can get chip'd by taking up resources or whatever, put it off until we're all chip'd and safe and the economy is all opened up and we can party as it happens.
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: sys on January 08, 2021, 09:23:07 PM
like i said originally, if there aren't 17 senate republicans that want to do this, then don't do it.
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: LickNeckey on January 08, 2021, 10:03:01 PM
i hate to give Dax oxygen here but it is just too amazing to behold

the guy rails about Benghazi and shouts about references to YouTube videos for years on end

he still is fixated on emails and bleachbit 4 years after Hillary has been involved in politics


that being said he really doesn't have much to say about a sitting president offering to lead an armed insurrection against the us congressional delegation in an attempt to usurp the democratic process and carry out a coup killing a cop and leaving 4 others dead

oh except for that one black guy there, he seems to find that suspicious
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: waks on January 09, 2021, 02:26:51 AM
He's an IRL crazy person that leads a miserable life. He was literally banned from K-State sporting events for being a pyscho. What do you expect? Cue his "you're all enraged" comments.
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: chum1 on January 09, 2021, 11:47:22 AM
I guess these were the terms not to throw his ass out.

Quote
Graham called Trump yesterday and explained that there were enough Republican votes in the Senate to remove Trump from office unless he conceded the election and diffused tensions. “He told Trump that he had to say there would be a ‘peaceful transition.’

https://twitter.com/gabrielsherman/status/1347660584758734849
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: steve dave on January 09, 2021, 12:20:59 PM
Nice work from Lindsey there


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: steve dave on January 09, 2021, 03:34:02 PM
https://twitter.com/AndrewSolender/status/1348019295108919300
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: Phil Titola on January 09, 2021, 04:03:36 PM
Like I don't even know what impeachment would be for if it isn't for this situation.
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: michigancat on January 09, 2021, 04:41:47 PM
Like I don't even know what impeachment would be for if it isn't for this situation.

in a way pressuring the GA secretary of state was almost more egregious and easier to convict
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: chum1 on January 10, 2021, 10:18:10 AM
If it's not going to happen before the 20th, might as well wait for more damning evidence. I'm pretty confident there will be some. Maybe a lot.

https://twitter.com/AlexThomp/status/1348290044474359813
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: wetwillie on January 10, 2021, 10:18:52 AM
You can impeach someone who longer holds office?
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: chum1 on January 10, 2021, 10:24:28 AM
You can impeach someone who longer holds office?

Yes
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: wetwillie on January 10, 2021, 10:33:56 AM
You can impeach someone who longer holds office?

Yes

Lets do Don and Hilary at the same time
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: catastrophe on January 10, 2021, 10:37:11 AM
Time to pull together evidence will also give Republicans time to obfuscate in the hopes to alleviate political pressure.

I think the house should impeach ASAP. Then senate says it is collecting evidence and will hold trial in March.
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: MakeItRain on January 10, 2021, 12:11:12 PM
If it's not going to happen before the 20th, might as well wait for more damning evidence. I'm pretty confident there will be some. Maybe a lot.

https://twitter.com/AlexThomp/status/1348290044474359813

Hmmm, I read this exact argument somewhere before. Good plan Jim.
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: Kat Kid on January 10, 2021, 01:18:41 PM
You can impeach someone who longer holds office?

Yes

Lets do Don and Hilary at the same time
I would be in favor of impeaching all the living presidents and then executing them on the mall.
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: Gooch on January 10, 2021, 01:57:46 PM
You can impeach someone who longer holds office?

Yes

Lets do Don and Hilary at the same time
I would be in favor of impeaching all the living presidents and then executing them on the mall.
Even Jimmy Carter?
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: Kat Kid on January 10, 2021, 02:07:08 PM
Jimmy has done a lot to redeem himself post-presidency, but I’ll let the lord sort em. I mean he’s almost dead anyways.
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: chum1 on January 10, 2021, 05:52:39 PM
https://twitter.com/kyledcheney/status/1348415079696523265
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: chum1 on January 12, 2021, 09:47:29 AM
Thankfully

https://twitter.com/mkraju/status/1349012715734499337
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: chum1 on January 12, 2021, 04:36:34 PM
Quote
he has made clear in private discussions that he believes now is the moment to move on from the weakened lame duck, whom he blames for causing Republicans to lose the Senate.

https://twitter.com/jmartNYT/status/1349107100593647621
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: Phil Titola on January 12, 2021, 05:23:27 PM
Thankfully

https://twitter.com/mkraju/status/1349012715734499337
It's sad that is news. Isn't this how they should all vote for everything?
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: michigancat on January 12, 2021, 07:08:09 PM
Thankfully

https://twitter.com/mkraju/status/1349012715734499337
It's sad that is news. Isn't this how they should all vote for everything?
IMO they should vote based on the pressure of their constituents but that's a bit of an oversimplification.
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: catastrophe on January 12, 2021, 07:38:54 PM
In my fan fiction, people would vote based on the representative’s conscience and then the representative would apply it to everything.
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: sonofdaxjones on January 13, 2021, 08:46:38 AM
Steny Hoyer (D) now fully affirming on the floor of Congress that ProgFascists are in total lock step and fully assimilated with the Dick Cheney NeoCon wing of politics.

Thank you Steny for doting the i's and crossing the t's on the Congressional transcript (and beyond mere legislation alone) relative to this reality.



Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: sonofdaxjones on January 13, 2021, 10:38:35 AM
Shaky hands OxyGin Pelosi has made Eric "love you long time" Swalwell impeachment manager.   :lol: :lol:

Don't tear that rotator cuff Paramount Leader Xi.

Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: star seed 7 on January 13, 2021, 10:50:51 AM
In my fan fiction, people would vote based on the representative’s conscience and then the representative would apply it to everything.

Look what happened to Ted cruz when he told the republican covention'rs to vote their conscience. He was working phone banks for trump 2 months later.
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: chum1 on January 13, 2021, 01:10:39 PM
It would be gratifying to throw Trump out. Hopefully, this makes it easier to convict.

https://twitter.com/seungminkim/status/1349413938480492546
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: bucket on January 13, 2021, 01:40:02 PM
https://twitter.com/RalstonReports/status/1349425317467705345
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: Institutional Control on January 13, 2021, 03:32:12 PM
10 Republicans voted to impeach.
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: Institutional Control on January 13, 2021, 03:40:39 PM
10 Republicans voted to impeach.

Wonder how many didn't vote yes because they truly fear for their own and family's lives.

Probably another 10-15.

No way they get even close to the amount of votes needed in the Senate. 
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: sonofdaxjones on January 13, 2021, 04:00:23 PM
Were there any Dems who didn't vote to impeach?

If so, I can only imagine the onslaught of outrage they're going to face from ProgFascistNeoCon Nation.

Probably be deplatformed across the entire spectrum of politics, sustenance, livelihood and financial/monetary participation.   Certainly death threats.





Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: ChiComCat on January 13, 2021, 04:03:19 PM
Were their any Dems who didn't vote to impeach?

If so, I can only imagine the onslaught of outrage they're going to face from ProgFascistNeoCon Nation.

Probably be deplatformed across the entire spectrum of politics, sustenance, livelihood and financial/monetary participation.   Certainly death threats.


lol so dumb
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: sonofdaxjones on January 13, 2021, 04:04:23 PM
Were their any Dems who didn't vote to impeach?

If so, I can only imagine the onslaught of outrage they're going to face from ProgFascistNeoCon Nation.

Probably be deplatformed across the entire spectrum of politics, sustenance, livelihood and financial/monetary participation.   Certainly death threats.


lol so dumb

What I described is just BAU for ProgFascistNeoCon nation, apparently you haven't been paying close attention to your orders or the news.

SMDH

Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: chum1 on January 13, 2021, 04:05:47 PM
No way they get even close to the amount of votes needed in the Senate. 

I definitely wouldn't say no way. If McConnell really thinks it's best for the party to make a break from Trump as reported, they'll convict.
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: star seed 7 on January 13, 2021, 04:07:08 PM
Were there any Dems who didn't vote to impeach?

If so, I can only imagine the onslaught of outrage they're going to face from ProgFascistNeoCon Nation.

Probably be deplatformed across the entire spectrum of politics, sustenance, livelihood and financial/monetary participation.   Certainly death threats.

Nothing is confirmed.  So anyone saying it’s made up doesn’t have the first rough ridin' clue if it is or not.
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: sonofdaxjones on January 13, 2021, 04:08:45 PM
Were there any Dems who didn't vote to impeach?

If so, I can only imagine the onslaught of outrage they're going to face from ProgFascistNeoCon Nation.

Probably be deplatformed across the entire spectrum of politics, sustenance, livelihood and financial/monetary participation.   Certainly death threats.

Nothing is confirmed.  So anyone saying it’s made up doesn’t have the first rough ridin' clue if it is or not.

Someone's high

Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: DaBigTrain on January 13, 2021, 04:09:46 PM
LOL

https://twitter.com/projectlincoln/status/1349474783545606144
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: sonofdaxjones on January 13, 2021, 04:10:48 PM
The Big Turd loves his grifters.

Just can't flush this dude.

Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: DaBigTrain on January 13, 2021, 04:12:03 PM
LOL

(https://uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/20210113/9f44f411f7a9f29e7dc9a003d1170e56.jpg)
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: Sandstone Outcropping on January 13, 2021, 04:13:40 PM
LOL

(https://uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/20210113/9f44f411f7a9f29e7dc9a003d1170e56.jpg)
You can ignore posts with TapaTalk?
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: sonofdaxjones on January 13, 2021, 04:15:04 PM
The unflushable Big Turd expanded the posts and read them.

Little dude does have mental issues and is extremely unstable.

Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: DaBigTrain on January 13, 2021, 04:15:31 PM
LOL

(https://uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/20210113/9f44f411f7a9f29e7dc9a003d1170e56.jpg)
You can ignore posts with TapaTalk?
It applies in TapaTalk too if you do this

https://goEMAW.com/forum/index.php?topic=42374.0
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: star seed 7 on January 13, 2021, 04:17:12 PM
The unflushable Big Turd expanded the posts and read them.

Little dude does have mental issues and is extremely unstable.

Lol, 100%
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: ChiComCat on January 13, 2021, 04:18:57 PM
Were their any Dems who didn't vote to impeach?

If so, I can only imagine the onslaught of outrage they're going to face from ProgFascistNeoCon Nation.

Probably be deplatformed across the entire spectrum of politics, sustenance, livelihood and financial/monetary participation.   Certainly death threats.


lol so dumb

What I described is just BAU for ProgFascistNeoCon nation, apparently you haven't been paying close attention to your orders or the news.

SMDH



You're right, I'm sure Dems are concerned about death threats from their base as opposed to your "trespassers" that were roaming the halls with nooses and restraints asking where the Democratic leadership was.  Makes a whole lot of rough ridin' sense. 

Also lol at you pretending to be concerned about them receiving what you classified as "mean phone calls" when MAGAs were threatening Michigan state government.
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: sonofdaxjones on January 13, 2021, 04:24:12 PM
Were their any Dems who didn't vote to impeach?

If so, I can only imagine the onslaught of outrage they're going to face from ProgFascistNeoCon Nation.

Probably be deplatformed across the entire spectrum of politics, sustenance, livelihood and financial/monetary participation.   Certainly death threats.


lol so dumb

What I described is just BAU for ProgFascistNeoCon nation, apparently you haven't been paying close attention to your orders or the news.

SMDH



You're right, I'm sure Dems are concerned about death threats from their base as opposed to your "trespassers" that were roaming the halls with nooses and restraints asking where the Democratic leadership was.  Makes a whole lot of rough ridin' sense. 

Also lol at you pretending to be concerned about them receiving what you classified as "mean phone calls" when MAGAs were threatening Michigan state government.

First of all the Michigan State police said they had, and I repeat "no credible threats".

You're total lack of awareness relative to the actions of your movement and politicians, their families and their homes over the last 6 months while predictable is still astounding. 

Not to mention numerous members of your movement openly espousing and agreeing with . . . making lists of people who simply disagree with them.   This is occurring at the national and state level.

Good rough ridin' Grief





Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: ChiComCat on January 13, 2021, 04:55:07 PM
Not scared of people overrunning the Capitol but scared of lists. Got it.
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: Dugout DickStone on January 13, 2021, 04:59:11 PM
Not scared of people overrunning the Capitol but scared of lists. Got it.

Stupid people are scared of weird things but not scared of actual dangerous things.  It's quite a phenom
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: Phil Titola on January 13, 2021, 07:06:19 PM
Can someone do a venn diagram of presidents impeached twice and incited an insurrection and dax would die for?
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: Institutional Control on January 13, 2021, 07:24:48 PM
https://twitter.com/mtgreenee/status/1349514160749633536?s=21


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: Pete on January 13, 2021, 07:29:46 PM
https://twitter.com/mtgreenee/status/1349514160749633536?s=21


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Yeah, we aren’t ever going to be one happy family, are we?
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: steve dave on January 13, 2021, 08:02:07 PM
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/ErpFwAwWMAAm0DS?format=jpg&name=small)
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: catastrophe on January 13, 2021, 11:27:47 PM
Nancy seems to have him on a leash now: https://youtu.be/hDNiNdsPHNA
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: sonofdaxjones on January 13, 2021, 11:46:34 PM
Is there a city a ProgFascist wouldn't burn to the ground if they didn't get their way?

Answer:  No

Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: MakeItRain on January 14, 2021, 02:27:45 AM
https://twitter.com/mtgreenee/status/1349514160749633536?s=21


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Yeah, we aren’t ever going to be one happy family, are we?

She's an idiot and this doesn't even make sense. She may as well said she's filing articles of impeachment against the moon for not wearing a helmet when snowboarding.
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: MakeItRain on January 14, 2021, 02:34:30 AM
My guy Anthony Gonzalez voted for impeachment, he's really trying singlehandedly to get me to become a pub.
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: IPA4Me on January 14, 2021, 07:43:06 AM
https://twitter.com/senatemajldr/status/1349476803514146819
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: steve dave on January 14, 2021, 07:50:43 AM
I agree with Mitch here tbh.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: Pete on January 14, 2021, 07:58:21 AM
I agree with Mitch here tbh.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Same.  Frankly, they may find they garner more support for a conviction later as the various other authorities start to go after President Trump with their own evidence and charges.
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: IPA4Me on January 14, 2021, 08:14:37 AM
Southern District of New York should be able to hang enough felonies on him to prohibit future office considerations.
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: ChiComCat on January 14, 2021, 08:16:14 AM
Well I would've said there wasn't enough time to push a Supreme Court nominee through too but he sure as hell made that happen
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: Phil Titola on January 14, 2021, 08:17:07 AM
Agree with Mitchell
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: WildcatNkilt on January 14, 2021, 08:58:17 AM
What Mitch is saying makes total sense.  Worry about that crap later at this point.  They have plenty of time if their end goal is to ensure Trump can't run again. 
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: Gooch on January 14, 2021, 09:11:12 AM
Southern District of New York should be able to hang enough felonies on him to prohibit future office considerations.
Apparently being a felon does not exclude you from public office.
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: Dugout DickStone on January 14, 2021, 09:28:01 AM
He will not have even close to enough money to ever run again.  His base are broke dicks and he has more debt than he put our country in. 
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: IPA4Me on January 14, 2021, 09:28:25 AM
Southern District of New York should be able to hang enough felonies on him to prohibit future office considerations.
Apparently being a felon does not exclude you from public office.
He'll be dead before he leaves prison.

Sent from my moto g power using Tapatalk

Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: chum1 on January 14, 2021, 09:38:31 AM
As time goes by, his brains are going to continue to get mushier and he's going to continue to sound crazier. I'm honestly kinda curious to see that.
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: sonofdaxjones on January 14, 2021, 09:40:12 AM
As time goes by, his brains are going to continue to get mushier and he's going to continue to sound crazier. I'm honestly kinda curious to see that.

Rate this in Biden's (1 to 7), chum.

Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: Dugout DickStone on January 14, 2021, 09:56:50 AM
As time goes by, his brains are going to continue to get mushier and he's going to continue to sound crazier. I'm honestly kinda curious to see that.

His devotees will also get more ball tazey, but fewer as they grow up and realize they can't count on Qanon.
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: chum1 on January 21, 2021, 08:45:12 PM
https://twitter.com/RepMTG/status/1352359178355011586
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: wetwillie on January 21, 2021, 08:48:18 PM
The nose on that thing, my goodness.
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: steve dave on January 21, 2021, 08:55:01 PM
https://twitter.com/RepMTG/status/1352359178355011586

it's like if kobach had gotten through. unbelievable.
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: Institutional Control on January 21, 2021, 09:13:52 PM
https://twitter.com/RepMTG/status/1352359178355011586

it's like if kobach had gotten through. unbelievable.
Less embarrassing though because she’s not from Ks.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: chum1 on January 22, 2021, 10:26:49 AM
https://twitter.com/npfandos/status/1352635300028305419
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: Sandstone Outcropping on January 22, 2021, 10:29:02 AM
https://twitter.com/RepMTG/status/1352359178355011586

it's like if kobach had gotten through. unbelievable.
Less embarrassing though because she’s not from Ks.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Sad commentary on the state of our democracy that someone this uncoupled from reality could make it to Congress.
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: star seed 7 on January 22, 2021, 10:30:16 AM
Crazy ass people make it to the house all the time. It's more concerning when senators do.
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: Sandstone Outcropping on January 22, 2021, 10:38:07 AM
Crazy ass people make it to the house all the time. It's more concerning when senators do.
True.
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: star seed 7 on January 22, 2021, 10:41:33 AM
Like, if you think the US house is nuts, take a look at any state legislature. The smaller the pool of voters, the more likely a crazy person is to win.
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: sonofdaxjones on January 22, 2021, 10:43:15 AM
Pretty awesome.

Hey hey, only we can impeach President's (ProgFascists)

Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: wetwillie on January 22, 2021, 11:47:01 AM
Does she represent a district that would be considered crazy?
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: star seed 7 on January 22, 2021, 11:50:10 AM
Does she represent a district that would be considered crazy?

Her district borders Alabama so....
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: wetwillie on January 22, 2021, 11:58:54 AM
Does she represent a district that would be considered crazy?

Her district borders Alabama so....

I mean if the process works you get a representation of the majority of the district.  crap ton of crazies in America means a good portion of crazies in the house.
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: sonofdaxjones on January 22, 2021, 12:04:04 PM
Only we can call everything we don't like impeachment worthy (ProgFascist Nation)

Particularly  :lol:  knowing that Quid Pro Joe the Ukrainian shake down artist now occupies the Oval Office



Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: LickNeckey on January 22, 2021, 12:22:27 PM
https://www.hsgac.senate.gov/imo/media/doc/HSGAC_Finance_Report_FINAL.pdf
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: DQ12 on January 22, 2021, 01:47:31 PM
https://twitter.com/RexChapman/status/1352641061911470082?s=20

 :Keke:
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: catastrophe on January 22, 2021, 02:25:28 PM
If that’s the charge Dax can be Exhibit A
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: waks on January 22, 2021, 04:42:42 PM
Well he did basically rape our democracy for the last four years so I think it fits.
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: Dugout DickStone on January 22, 2021, 04:44:49 PM
Well he did basically rape our democracy for the last four years so I think it fits.


lol, he is impotent AF
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: sonofdaxjones on January 22, 2021, 05:14:05 PM
Nothing incites a chubby in ProgFascist world like impeachment hearings based upon lunatic conspiracy theories.



Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: Kat Kid on January 23, 2021, 07:26:58 AM
I’m all for accountability, but this impeachment trial to nowhere while the Biden agenda stalls out before it even gets started is peak Democrats.
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: chum1 on January 23, 2021, 01:26:23 PM
I think they should drag it out for a couple years like the Benghazi investigation. And when pubs scream about the length, scream at them for being traitors.
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: MakeItRain on January 24, 2021, 08:38:49 PM
I’m all for accountability, but this impeachment trial to nowhere while the Biden agenda stalls out before it even gets started is peak Democrats.

No surprise but I agree with you. I also think there should be a commission investigate the election and the aftermath, those findings can be used in impeachment proceedings.
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: Dugout DickStone on January 25, 2021, 09:20:38 AM
Does she represent a district that would be considered crazy?

Her district borders Alabama so....

her district is full of people who hate exercise
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: Kat Kid on January 25, 2021, 09:42:27 AM
I think they should drag it out for a couple years like the Benghazi investigation. And when pubs scream about the length, scream at them for being traitors.
I agree, committee investigations that allow people to grandstand on their own time won’t really accomplish much either but that’s fine. They absolutely should table the impeachment, pass the stimulus, and get their committee chairs seated. Right now McConnell is trying to hold them hostage by playing hardball on the rules but he knows that manchin won’t go along with him for too long so it is just a short term play to delay Biden’s agenda and see if the Dems eff it up and start working the “problem solvers caucus” to stall
momentum for stimulus. So far so good for Mitch.
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: star seed 7 on January 25, 2021, 10:39:10 AM
Mitch is very good at his job
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: bucket on January 30, 2021, 07:46:53 PM
https://twitter.com/kaitlancollins/status/1355683228640813061

Rudy! Rudy! Rudy!
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: steve dave on January 31, 2021, 06:28:26 AM
his entire legal team quit, lmao

https://twitter.com/ryanjreilly/status/1355716667532320770
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: Kat Kid on January 31, 2021, 08:51:03 AM
I think they should drag it out for a couple years like the Benghazi investigation. And when pubs scream about the length, scream at them for being traitors.
I agree, committee investigations that allow people to grandstand on their own time won’t really accomplish much either but that’s fine. They absolutely should table the impeachment, pass the stimulus, and get their committee chairs seated. Right now McConnell is trying to hold them hostage by playing hardball on the rules but he knows that manchin won’t go along with him for too long so it is just a short term play to delay Biden’s agenda and see if the Dems eff it up and start working the “problem solvers caucus” to stall
momentum for stimulus. So far so good for Mitch.

I can kind of appreciate Mitch's stance/play on rules. Like why not ask the majority to put themselves in a negotiationing position with less power and leverage straight up before you have to negotiate/message for 2 years? It even falls within a priority of giving them less time to govern as a majority.

Mitch capitulated on demanding that the new rules include guarantee of filibuster.
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: Dugout DickStone on January 31, 2021, 11:35:17 AM
holy crap his entire legal team quit!?

What about the very crazy Lin guy and the also crazy lady? They seem willing to say crazy stuff and get stiffed on the tab
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: star seed 7 on January 31, 2021, 11:42:25 AM
The Florida bar told Lin wood he needs a psych eval  :frown:
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: Dugout DickStone on January 31, 2021, 12:14:16 PM
The Florida bar told Lin wood he needs a psych eval  :frown:

trump supporters.
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: Spracne on January 31, 2021, 12:15:26 PM
The Florida bar told Lin wood he needs a psych eval  :frown:

Georgia, actually. Also, Sandmann the Smirking Smirker fired him this week. From Forbes:

Quote
The Georgia Bar’s proceedings are the latest consequence Wood has faced for his post-election actions. The attorney has been removed from a separate case in Delaware where he represented former Trump advisor Carter Page over his “toxic” post-election litigation. Nicholas Sandmann, an 18-year-old from Covington Catholic High School who gained attention for his viral standoff with a Native American elder, also fired Wood as his attorney on Tuesday. MSNBC host Joy Reid has asked a New York federal court to remove Wood from a defamation case against her, and Mercer Law School is facing pressure to remove Wood’s name from a courtroom at the school. Dominion Voting Systems, which has already filed two $1.3 billion lawsuits against attorneys Powell and Rudy Giuliani, has suggested it may pursue litigation against Wood for spreading baseless election fraud claims involving the company’s voting machines, though nothing has yet been filed.
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: Dugout DickStone on January 31, 2021, 01:19:11 PM
He is just so trump through and through and the MSM fake news deep state can't handle it.
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: Rage Against the McKee on January 31, 2021, 02:48:01 PM
The best thing he could do for himself at his impeachment trial is probably to just stay quiet and not present a defense, anyway. The repulicans won't convict, and anything he puts out there will only make himself look worse.
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: Dugout DickStone on February 01, 2021, 08:56:04 AM
I don't get why there isn't some maga lawyer willing to put on a show for the maga/Q's

unless the whole "the election was stolen" thing is literally 1 billion % bullshit and not even an ambulance chaser will touch it
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: chum1 on February 01, 2021, 09:14:56 AM
Somewhere in the equation is McConnell and a bunch of non-MAGA senators who actually don't want to see a shitshow from Trump's side.
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: wetwillie on February 01, 2021, 09:22:07 AM
I thought we were taking KK’a advice and just executing the living presidents on the lawn of the mall
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: Dugout DickStone on February 01, 2021, 09:24:54 AM
Somewhere in the equation is McConnell and a bunch of non-MAGA senators who actually don't want to see a shitshow from Trump's side.

Don't they have to let him put on his show?  Currently trump is enormously popular with the alabama maga types who think the CA wildfires were started buy jewish space lasers
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: chum1 on February 02, 2021, 06:12:54 PM
This is indeed weird. Seems Graham, as usual, is doing it at the behest of Trump. Why does Trump not want witnesses? Because they might incriminate him?

https://twitter.com/AaronBlake/status/1356629845229383680
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: Gooch on February 03, 2021, 04:26:10 PM
This could really be the MyPillow crackhead's time to shine.
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: MadCat on February 03, 2021, 04:29:32 PM
I like to imagine that there is a parallel universe very close to our own where the Myanmar military coup was replaced with the Mypillow military coup.
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: chum1 on February 04, 2021, 01:29:30 PM
https://twitter.com/kylegriffin1/status/1357390977980243970
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: Dugout DickStone on February 04, 2021, 01:39:43 PM
No chance he will now.  That was a stupid move if they wanted him to testify.
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: Institutional Control on February 04, 2021, 01:47:04 PM
No chance he will now.  That was a stupid move if they wanted him to testify.

Does he still have executive privilege or could be arrested for contempt of Congress if he doesn't testify?
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: Dugout DickStone on February 04, 2021, 01:48:50 PM
No chance he will now.  That was a stupid move if they wanted him to testify.

Does he still have executive privilege or could be arrested for contempt of Congress if he doesn't testify?

Certainly still has his 5th amend rights.
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: star seed 7 on February 04, 2021, 02:00:48 PM
From what I can tell from texags, the democrats have really stepped in it now. Trump is going to 4d chess this and expose all the election fraud from the stand.
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: Dugout DickStone on February 04, 2021, 02:01:40 PM
From what I can tell from texags, the democrats have really stepped in it now. Trump is going to 4d chess this and expose all the election fraud from the stand.

yup they got those dems right where they want them!
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: catastrophe on February 04, 2021, 04:23:42 PM
No chance he will now.  That was a stupid move if they wanted him to testify.

Does he still have executive privilege or could be arrested for contempt of Congress if he doesn't testify?

Certainly still has his 5th amend rights.
If they could still drag him in though there is no way he’d take counsel’s advice to shut up.
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: Rage Against the McKee on February 04, 2021, 05:56:17 PM
I'm not sure Lin Wood or Rudy would even counsel him to shut up.
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: Institutional Control on February 09, 2021, 02:18:51 PM
Trump's attorney decided to spend 15 minutes kissing up to Senators.
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: Sandstone Outcropping on February 09, 2021, 02:22:47 PM
https://twitter.com/wthrockmorton/status/1359231836266856451?s=20
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: sonofdaxjones on February 09, 2021, 02:30:10 PM
2/9/21:  A ProgFascist's care about cops day (National Guard/Military TBD)


Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: Rage Against the McKee on February 09, 2021, 02:41:36 PM
https://twitter.com/wthrockmorton/status/1359231836266856451?s=20

The best part about the "mulligan" quote is that this is the second time he's been impeached.
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: Institutional Control on February 09, 2021, 02:51:55 PM
https://twitter.com/jonstewart/status/1359241142131437570?s=20
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: DaBigTrain on February 09, 2021, 03:02:40 PM
Man, that oscar Castor guy has his crap together
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: Sandstone Outcropping on February 09, 2021, 03:44:20 PM
The January Exception?

https://twitter.com/atrupar/status/1359206921039974406?s=20
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: Trim on February 09, 2021, 03:54:23 PM
I didn’t realize they were actually doing this. Is anyone there listening to the talkers and taking it all in and then weighing all that to decide if trump should be convicted, or is this a thing where everyone gets a turn to make their speech for their audience of voters and then everyone votes in whatever way will be best for their own electability?
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: Sandstone Outcropping on February 09, 2021, 03:55:49 PM
https://twitter.com/jonstewart/status/1359241142131437570?s=20
Les Miles-esqe. He starts off explaining to the Senate what the 1st Amendment is and "trading liberty for security."
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: star seed 7 on February 09, 2021, 03:57:16 PM
I didn’t realize they were actually doing this. Is anyone there listening to the talkers and taking it all in and then weighing all that to decide if trump should be convicted, or is this a thing where everyone gets a turn to make their speech for their audience of voters and then everyone votes in whatever way will be best for their own electability?

Every single juror has already made up their mind
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: Institutional Control on February 09, 2021, 04:04:25 PM
I would hire Jamie Raskin to be my attorney.
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: Trim on February 09, 2021, 04:05:49 PM
I didn’t realize they were actually doing this. Is anyone there listening to the talkers and taking it all in and then weighing all that to decide if trump should be convicted, or is this a thing where everyone gets a turn to make their speech for their audience of voters and then everyone votes in whatever way will be best for their own electability?

Every single juror has already made up their mind

These motherfuckers should all be making ‘chips while they’re sitting there pretending to listen.

Assuming that’s not practical, have all money and resources that would normally be used for whatever they’d otherwise be doing get reallocated to getting ‘chips installed in people.
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: Institutional Control on February 09, 2021, 05:57:37 PM
https://twitter.com/julienbcnews/status/1359266324690649089?s=21


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: wetwillie on February 09, 2021, 06:30:30 PM
67 senators to vote yes seems like a breeze.
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: Sandstone Outcropping on February 10, 2021, 08:04:09 AM
67 senators to vote yes seems like a breeze.
Not sure if you are being sarcastic. Siobahn Hughes says not a chance:

https://www.wsj.com/podcasts/the-journal/trump-second-impeachment-trial-begins/274D35FF-0A6C-404D-9156-42A09081D4FF (https://www.wsj.com/podcasts/the-journal/trump-second-impeachment-trial-begins/274D35FF-0A6C-404D-9156-42A09081D4FF)
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: Sandstone Outcropping on February 10, 2021, 08:09:40 AM
Sounds like a great defense strategy:

https://twitter.com/justinbaragona/status/1359335078715928576?s=20 (https://twitter.com/justinbaragona/status/1359335078715928576?s=20)
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: sonofdaxjones on February 10, 2021, 08:20:50 AM
Hey hey, only we can tell our people to get in their faces!!  (ProgFascist Nation)

Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: star seed 7 on February 10, 2021, 08:34:25 AM
How many resident ProgFascists would storm the capitol building if Joey Biden told us to?

I have mountains of pto banked but it doesn't really appeal to me personally.
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: Dugout DickStone on February 10, 2021, 08:38:18 AM
How many resident ProgFascists would storm the capitol building if Joey Biden told us to?

I have mountains of pto banked but it doesn't really appeal to me personally.

How about tazing your own unit until you are dead in a pool of pee?  Does that sound fun?
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: LickNeckey on February 10, 2021, 08:42:03 AM
Hey hey, only we can tell our people to get in their faces!!  (ProgFascist Nation)

exactly

once again WWD with his finger on the pulse
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: cfbandyman on February 10, 2021, 08:45:04 AM
How many resident ProgFascists would storm the capitol building if Joey Biden told us to?

I have mountains of pto banked but it doesn't really appeal to me personally.

My cup overflowith with PTO, so does my workload. So the saving of democracy will have to wait after the workday is complete and I actually get a day off.
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: star seed 7 on February 10, 2021, 08:45:31 AM
How many resident ProgFascists would storm the capitol building if Joey Biden told us to?

I have mountains of pto banked but it doesn't really appeal to me personally.

How about tazing your own unit until you are dead in a pool of pee?  Does that sound fun?

That does not sound like fun to me but different strokes ya'know?
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: sonofdaxjones on February 10, 2021, 10:13:31 AM
Resident ProgFascist/#blueanon account for .0000001176 of ProgFascist/#blueanon nation

Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: Dugout DickStone on February 10, 2021, 10:20:53 AM
How many resident ProgFascists would storm the capitol building if Joey Biden told us to?

I have mountains of pto banked but it doesn't really appeal to me personally.

How about tazing your own unit until you are dead in a pool of pee?  Does that sound fun?



That does not sound like fun to me but different strokes ya'know?

maga is not for you my friend
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: chum1 on February 13, 2021, 10:49:12 AM
Ahahahahaha YESSSSSSSSS

https://twitter.com/AndrewDesiderio/status/1360618435386957833

https://twitter.com/sahilkapur/status/1360619448697294862

https://twitter.com/pdmcleod/status/1360619853200171008
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: Dugout DickStone on February 13, 2021, 11:30:06 AM
If you are the wife of the trump supporter who tazed his own privates until he died you have to demand a few minutes to try and claim he didn't, right?

 "mr. president, he shocked his own gonads to death because he loved you so much.  I think its only fair I get to pretend he didn't"
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: Brock Landers on February 13, 2021, 11:35:55 AM
Perhaps some of the dozens of lawyers on here can weigh in on this question, but is it bad when a room full of people openly laughs at you?  TIA.
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: Spracne on February 13, 2021, 11:55:06 AM
Perhaps some of the dozens of lawyers on here can weigh in on this question, but is it bad when a room full of people openly laughs at you?  TIA.
Not if you're a cat.
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: Dugout DickStone on February 13, 2021, 01:42:40 PM
Perhaps some of the dozens of lawyers on here can weigh in on this question, but is it bad when a room full of people openly laughs at you?  TIA.
Not if you're a cat.

Mr. Pickles, Esq. can be very persuasive.

But to answer the questions yes, team Trump was handing out free lols. Literally free because he will never pay them
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: cfbandyman on February 13, 2021, 02:25:29 PM
Perhaps some of the dozens of lawyers on here can weigh in on this question, but is it bad when a room full of people openly laughs at you?  TIA.
Not if you're a cat.

Mr. Pickles, Esq. can be very persuasive.

But to answer the questions yes, team Drumpf was handing out free lols. Literally free because he will never pay them

This part of the trump mystic still baffles me cause it's not like he has not screwed literally tens of thousands of people out of money since like, the 80s. It's not like some completely unknown, come out of nowhere thing when it's been happening for 40 some years. Guess it proves just how dumb, desperate, or ignorant so many yokels are to rush to his aid, defense, or just work for him for free.
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: Dugout DickStone on February 13, 2021, 02:26:13 PM
well trump's lawyer just admitted he lost the election fair and square.
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: sys on February 13, 2021, 02:57:49 PM
damn, i'm really surprised they got seven republicans.  also, didn't realize they were going to vote today.
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: wetwillie on February 13, 2021, 03:01:17 PM
RIP those 7 pubs
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: cfbandyman on February 13, 2021, 03:11:44 PM
RIP those 7 pubs

Yup, they will be the first ones on the chopping block the next time trump incites a riot and gets away with it
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: wetwillie on February 13, 2021, 03:32:13 PM
RIP those 7 pubs

I think they all voted with political expediency.

I don’t need your Sasse
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: chum1 on February 13, 2021, 03:35:58 PM
Related:

https://twitter.com/kathrynw5/status/1360695394913640452
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: wetwillie on February 13, 2021, 03:39:16 PM
Look at the balls on Murkowski
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: chum1 on February 13, 2021, 03:49:04 PM
Look at the balls on Murkowski

She got primaried as a pub incumbent, ran in the general election anyway as an independent, and won. (Something like that.) So, she does whatever the eff she wants.
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: sys on February 13, 2021, 04:00:08 PM
Look at the balls on Murkowski

She got primaried as a pub incumbent, ran in the general election anyway as an independent, and won. (Something like that.) So, she does whatever the eff she wants.

as a write in, actually.  a pretty amazing thing.

alaska has a top 4 ranked choice system now, so she should be relatively safe.
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: cfbandyman on February 13, 2021, 04:01:16 PM
It is still fairly ballsy for her, but they make em differently in Alaska
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: Sandstone Outcropping on February 13, 2021, 04:40:43 PM
Cross post to conservative self owns:

https://twitter.com/laurenboebert/status/1360710601497063424?s=20
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: sonofdaxjones on February 13, 2021, 05:53:03 PM
Was looking forward to the subpoenas and witnesses
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: steve dave on February 13, 2021, 06:02:37 PM
Cross post to conservative self owns:

https://twitter.com/laurenboebert/status/1360710601497063424?s=20
lmao


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: catastrophe on February 13, 2021, 07:57:14 PM
Say what you want but no president in history has ever been acquitted of incredibly heinous impeachable offenses twice. Most innocent president ever?
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: Sandstone Outcropping on February 14, 2021, 10:43:49 AM
 :ksu:
Say what you want but no president in history has ever been acquitted of incredibly heinous impeachable offenses twice. Most innocent president ever?
Everybody knows that his innocence is the strongest innocence. Just huge.
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: Rage Against the McKee on February 14, 2021, 12:39:58 PM
This had to have been the best outcome for the democrats, right? Make the republicans publicly vote against America and also keep Trump around to raise money for them...
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: MakeItRain on February 14, 2021, 12:52:42 PM
This had to have been the best outcome for the democrats, right? Make the republicans publicly vote against America and also keep Trump around to raise money for them...

The best outcome would have been actually getting the conviction. The second best outcome would have been for the turtle to vote for conviction, and pull a few more republicans with him. That would have further splintered the party and turtle boy definitely would have lost the majority leader and he would have been replaced with someone less capable of being an amoral obstructionist.

This result maintained the status quo.
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: Rage Against the McKee on February 14, 2021, 01:11:23 PM
Status quo is winning control of the house, senate, and presidency in 4 years while massively out fundraising and getting record turnout. A conviction would have given the republicans some degree of credibility and possibly created complacence with the democratic electorate.
Title: Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
Post by: chum1 on October 08, 2022, 07:11:49 AM
I guess we learned that impeachment is a pretty flawed process.

https://twitter.com/igorbobic/status/1578372273622261761