Nancy and most LibDerp leadership really love those ladies.
Plenty of talk of mainstream LibDerp Powerbrokers aka The ChiComJoe’ites lining up more acceptable D’s to run against “the squad” next time around.
Seems like a healthier party response to outliers within than what Pubs have done to make Trump their shining North Star
Oh yes, it's always extremely "healthy" when a political party works to unseat their incumbents.
I actually think it is healthy. A political party ostensibly stands for some ideology. When incumbents usurp the affiliation to get on the ballot, but don't align with the party ideology, the party should work to replace them with others who fit what the party stands for.
The issue with your take in regards to Republicans is that the definition of Republicans these days is using the words of people like the "squad" which you openly admit mainstream LibDerp Nation wants to replace.
See how that works? No, you probably don't.
You're going to have to translate this part: "The definition of Republicans these days is using the words of people like the 'squad'"
I do not see how that works or have any idea what that means.
I also have no idea whether "mainstream LibDerp Nation" wants to replace them, but if they do in order to maintain the tenets of the party that is certainly their prerogative.
Then you're an idiot and haven't been paying attention. The ProgLib faction of LibDerp Nation, lead by people like "the squad" have determined that all 'Pubs are racists-xenophobes based on the simple fact many of the same 'Pubs have the audacity to disagree with them.
Mainstream political operatives of the LibDerp movement are actively pursuing other candidates to run against "the squad" in primaries, yet the definition of 'Pubs as defined by entities like "the squad" remain in place.