goemaw.com
General Discussion => The New Joe Montgomery Birther Pit => Topic started by: gatoveintisiete on July 16, 2019, 09:23:48 PM
-
They run the party now, they are refreshingly honest about their beliefs for what would be good for this country. This hopefully will set up a straight forward choice for Americans to decide the direction of our future.
-
#SquadGoals #Socialism4life #Getrichordietrying
-
4 house reps getting into the president's kitchen is pretty funny guys. Especially female ones.
-
#Squad
-
They probably are where the democratic party will be in about 10 years.
-
They probably are where the democratic party will be in about 10 years.
Squad goals?
-
They probably are where the democratic party will be in about 10 years.
#DonJr2028
-
They probably are where the democratic party will be in about 10 years.
Your lips to the prophet Muhammad (May peace be upon him)’s ears.
-
Nancy and most LibDerp leadership really love those ladies.
Plenty of talk of mainstream LibDerp Powerbrokers aka The ChiComJoe’ites lining up more acceptable D’s to run against “the squad” next time around.
-
Dad please talk in the common tongue here. TIA.
-
ModSquaders are in no mans land, Squad base demands the real deal, its not enough to look the part anymore you gotta walk the Squad walk.
-
Nancy and most LibDerp leadership really love those ladies.
Plenty of talk of mainstream LibDerp Powerbrokers aka The ChiComJoe’ites lining up more acceptable D’s to run against “the squad” next time around.
Seems like a healthier party response to outliers within than what Pubs have done to make Trump their shining North Star
-
Nancy and most LibDerp leadership really love those ladies.
Plenty of talk of mainstream LibDerp Powerbrokers aka The ChiComJoe’ites lining up more acceptable D’s to run against “the squad” next time around.
Seems like a healthier party response to outliers within than what Pubs have done to make Trump their shining North Star
Oh yes, it's always extremely "healthy" when a political party works to unseat their incumbents.
-
Nancy and most LibDerp leadership really love those ladies.
Plenty of talk of mainstream LibDerp Powerbrokers aka The ChiComJoe’ites lining up more acceptable D’s to run against “the squad” next time around.
Seems like a healthier party response to outliers within than what Pubs have done to make Trump their shining North Star
Oh yes, it's always extremely "healthy" when a political party works to unseat their incumbents.
Pot meet kettle :lol:
-
Nancy and most LibDerp leadership really love those ladies.
Plenty of talk of mainstream LibDerp Powerbrokers aka The ChiComJoe’ites lining up more acceptable D’s to run against “the squad” next time around.
Seems like a healthier party response to outliers within than what Pubs have done to make Trump their shining North Star
Oh yes, it's always extremely "healthy" when a political party works to unseat their incumbents.
Pot meet kettle :lol:
You're so rough ridin' weird. That was not a one way partisan post, dummy.
-
Nancy and most LibDerp leadership really love those ladies.
Plenty of talk of mainstream LibDerp Powerbrokers aka The ChiComJoe’ites lining up more acceptable D’s to run against “the squad” next time around.
Seems like a healthier party response to outliers within than what Pubs have done to make Trump their shining North Star
Oh yes, it's always extremely "healthy" when a political party works to unseat their incumbents.
I actually think it is healthy. A political party ostensibly stands for some ideology. When incumbents usurp the affiliation to get on the ballot, but don't align with the party ideology, the party should work to replace them with others who fit what the party stands for.
-
Nancy and most LibDerp leadership really love those ladies.
Plenty of talk of mainstream LibDerp Powerbrokers aka The ChiComJoe’ites lining up more acceptable D’s to run against “the squad” next time around.
Seems like a healthier party response to outliers within than what Pubs have done to make Trump their shining North Star
Oh yes, it's always extremely "healthy" when a political party works to unseat their incumbents.
I actually think it is healthy. A political party ostensibly stands for some ideology. When incumbents usurp the affiliation to get on the ballot, but don't align with the party ideology, the party should work to replace them with others who fit what the party stands for.
The issue with your take in regards to Republicans is that the definition of Republicans these days is using the words of people like the "squad" which you openly admit mainstream LibDerp Nation wants to replace.
See how that works? No, you probably don't.
-
Nancy and most LibDerp leadership really love those ladies.
Plenty of talk of mainstream LibDerp Powerbrokers aka The ChiComJoe’ites lining up more acceptable D’s to run against “the squad” next time around.
Seems like a healthier party response to outliers within than what Pubs have done to make Trump their shining North Star
Oh yes, it's always extremely "healthy" when a political party works to unseat their incumbents.
I actually think it is healthy. A political party ostensibly stands for some ideology. When incumbents usurp the affiliation to get on the ballot, but don't align with the party ideology, the party should work to replace them with others who fit what the party stands for.
The issue with your take in regards to Republicans is that the definition of Republicans these days is using the words of people like the "squad" which you openly admit mainstream LibDerp Nation wants to replace.
See how that works? No, you probably don't.
You're going to have to translate this part: "The definition of Republicans these days is using the words of people like the 'squad'"
I do not see how that works or have any idea what that means.
I also have no idea whether "mainstream LibDerp Nation" wants to replace them, but if they do in order to maintain the tenets of the party that is certainly their prerogative.
-
What an odd thing for a trump supporter in Alabama to care about
-
What an odd thing for a trump supporter in Alabama to care about
90% of the things a dude living in Missouri cares about are weird
-
Nancy and most LibDerp leadership really love those ladies.
Plenty of talk of mainstream LibDerp Powerbrokers aka The ChiComJoe’ites lining up more acceptable D’s to run against “the squad” next time around.
Seems like a healthier party response to outliers within than what Pubs have done to make Trump their shining North Star
Oh yes, it's always extremely "healthy" when a political party works to unseat their incumbents.
I actually think it is healthy. A political party ostensibly stands for some ideology. When incumbents usurp the affiliation to get on the ballot, but don't align with the party ideology, the party should work to replace them with others who fit what the party stands for.
The issue with your take in regards to Republicans is that the definition of Republicans these days is using the words of people like the "squad" which you openly admit mainstream LibDerp Nation wants to replace.
See how that works? No, you probably don't.
You're going to have to translate this part: "The definition of Republicans these days is using the words of people like the 'squad'"
I do not see how that works or have any idea what that means.
I also have no idea whether "mainstream LibDerp Nation" wants to replace them, but if they do in order to maintain the tenets of the party that is certainly their prerogative.
Then you're an idiot and haven't been paying attention. The ProgLib faction of LibDerp Nation, lead by people like "the squad" have determined that all 'Pubs are racists-xenophobes based on the simple fact many of the same 'Pubs have the audacity to disagree with them.
Mainstream political operatives of the LibDerp movement are actively pursuing other candidates to run against "the squad" in primaries, yet the definition of 'Pubs as defined by entities like "the squad" remain in place.
-
Dax: the squad is hated by the party and they are going to be primaried
Also dax: the squad are loved by the party and are actually the leaders
-
Dax: the squad is hated by the party and they are going to be primaried
Also dax: the squad are loved by the party and are actually the leaders
I clearly defined the ProgLib wing of the party. As usual, you're so far behind you should just stop.
-
Nancy and most LibDerp leadership really love those ladies.
Plenty of talk of mainstream LibDerp Powerbrokers aka The ChiComJoe’ites lining up more acceptable D’s to run against “the squad” next time around.
Seems like a healthier party response to outliers within than what Pubs have done to make Trump their shining North Star
Oh yes, it's always extremely "healthy" when a political party works to unseat their incumbents.
I actually think it is healthy. A political party ostensibly stands for some ideology. When incumbents usurp the affiliation to get on the ballot, but don't align with the party ideology, the party should work to replace them with others who fit what the party stands for.
The issue with your take in regards to Republicans is that the definition of Republicans these days is using the words of people like the "squad" which you openly admit mainstream LibDerp Nation wants to replace.
See how that works? No, you probably don't.
You're going to have to translate this part: "The definition of Republicans these days is using the words of people like the 'squad'"
I do not see how that works or have any idea what that means.
I also have no idea whether "mainstream LibDerp Nation" wants to replace them, but if they do in order to maintain the tenets of the party that is certainly their prerogative.
Then you're an idiot and haven't been paying attention. The ProgLib faction of LibDerp Nation, lead by people like "the squad" have determined that all 'Pubs are racists-xenophobes based on the simple fact many of the same 'Pubs have the audacity to disagree with them.
Mainstream political operatives of the LibDerp movement are actively pursuing other candidates to run against "the squad" in primaries, yet the definition of 'Pubs as defined by entities like "the squad" remain in place.
How many people have you told to go back to Africa today?
-
Nancy and most LibDerp leadership really love those ladies.
Plenty of talk of mainstream LibDerp Powerbrokers aka The ChiComJoe’ites lining up more acceptable D’s to run against “the squad” next time around.
Seems like a healthier party response to outliers within than what Pubs have done to make Trump their shining North Star
Oh yes, it's always extremely "healthy" when a political party works to unseat their incumbents.
I actually think it is healthy. A political party ostensibly stands for some ideology. When incumbents usurp the affiliation to get on the ballot, but don't align with the party ideology, the party should work to replace them with others who fit what the party stands for.
The issue with your take in regards to Republicans is that the definition of Republicans these days is using the words of people like the "squad" which you openly admit mainstream LibDerp Nation wants to replace.
See how that works? No, you probably don't.
You're going to have to translate this part: "The definition of Republicans these days is using the words of people like the 'squad'"
I do not see how that works or have any idea what that means.
I also have no idea whether "mainstream LibDerp Nation" wants to replace them, but if they do in order to maintain the tenets of the party that is certainly their prerogative.
Then you're an idiot and haven't been paying attention. The ProgLib faction of LibDerp Nation, lead by people like "the squad" have determined that all 'Pubs are racists-xenophobes based on the simple fact many of the same 'Pubs have the audacity to disagree with them.
Mainstream political operatives of the LibDerp movement are actively pursuing other candidates to run against "the squad" in primaries, yet the definition of 'Pubs as defined by entities like "the squad" remain in place.
How many people have you told to go back to Africa today?
Tapout accepted
-
You obviously find statements like that acceptable, so be honest and let us know your count.
-
You obviously find statements like that acceptable, so be honest and let us know your count.
LibDerp7Flection: 11
-
Dax: telling people of color who are American citizens to go back to their own countries because you disagree with their opinion is completely acceptable
Also dax: calling out the obvious racism of that statement is UNACCEPTABLE
-
Dax: telling people of color who are American citizens to go back to their own countries because you disagree with their opinion is completely acceptable
Also dax: calling out the obvious racism of that statement is UNACCEPTABLE
Yep, I said all those things . . . in your dumb little head.
LibDerp7Flection Shields: Forward-Full!
-
Yes, you literally just posted exactly that.
Are you confused again?
-
Yes, you literally just posted exactly that.
Are you confused again?
This is like Parody Poster LibDerp7 on Crazy Pills again because I haven't addressed anything in this thread regarding telling any specific person to go anywhere or anything at all regarding what was said towards a specific person.
ParodyPosterLibDerp7 calls down to engineering and asks for more power: LibDerp7Flection Factor 130%
-
See, you two shouldn’t be countrymen.
-
Nancy and most LibDerp leadership really love those ladies.
Plenty of talk of mainstream LibDerp Powerbrokers aka The ChiComJoe’ites lining up more acceptable D’s to run against “the squad” next time around.
Seems like a healthier party response to outliers within than what Pubs have done to make Trump their shining North Star
Oh yes, it's always extremely "healthy" when a political party works to unseat their incumbents.
I actually think it is healthy. A political party ostensibly stands for some ideology. When incumbents usurp the affiliation to get on the ballot, but don't align with the party ideology, the party should work to replace them with others who fit what the party stands for.
In this particular case I can't think of many things the Democratic party could do that would be dumber than trying to get rid of AOC (or Omar or Pressley or Tlaib for that matter).
-
I've always thought that randomly Capitalizing words in massive run-on sentences makes one looks Quite Stable.
-
I've always thought that randomly Capitalizing words in massive run-on sentences makes one looks Quite Stable.
I've always thought that message board grammar and typing policing was the domain of extremely laid back and care free people.
-
Needs more caps, sorry I don't understand it.
-
it would be very dumb for the party to screw over its young stars, they are what the base voter wants and is energized by. 'pubs got loose from their establishment shot callers so it makes sense that the Squad wants the same for their side.
-
Needs more caps, sorry I don't understand it.
Setting aside your need to overly concern yourself with how someone types things on a message board will free your mind to greater understanding of things in plain sight.
-
https://twitter.com/diamondandsilk/status/1152138400662614016?s=21
-
makes you think
-
https://twitter.com/ritapanahi/status/1152726699777220608?s=21
-
Welp, she got a job.
-
LibDerp Nation: All Rage-All the Time
-
Welp, she got a job.
lol
-
https://twitter.com/realsaavedra/status/1153758054174695424?s=21
-
Multiple formal complaints filed against Omar: Student loan fraud, tax evasion, perjury and bigamy.
-
Got’em
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
-
Multiple formal complaints filed against Omar: Student loan fraud, tax evasion, perjury and bigamy.
Aww damn, a formal complaint? Filed by...*Googles* Judicial Watch?
Judicial Watch | Because No One Is Above The Law!
https://www.judicialwatch.org/
Judicial Watch, a conservative foundation, fights for accountability and integrity in law, politics and government. Because no one is above the law!
Aww eff man she is so totes boned on this one.
-
Multiple formal complaints filed against Omar: Student loan fraud, tax evasion, perjury and bigamy.
Aww damn, a formal complaint? Filed by...*Googles* Judicial Watch?
Judicial Watch | Because No One Is Above The Law!
https://www.judicialwatch.org/
Judicial Watch, a conservative foundation, fights for accountability and integrity in law, politics and government. Because no one is above the law!
Aww eff man she is so totes boned on this one.
You're such a source pearl clutcher, dude.
-
Multiple formal complaints filed against Omar: Student loan fraud, tax evasion, perjury and bigamy.
everybody who has formal complaints filed against them should definitely go back to where they came from
-
still got’em libtards
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk