0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.
KU is right on par with Notre Dame ... when it comes to adding additional conference revenue
Beer pro tip: never drink anything other than BL, coors, pbr, maybe a few others that I'm forgetting
Quote from: steve dave on November 29, 2011, 07:32:21 AM how dare you move this to one of the 'other' boards. This has serious implications for football recruiting!!!!
Bit airline industry analyst Seth Kaplan of Airline Weekly thinks otherwise. "Cuts will come," he said. "They’ve said everything is normal for now, but the cutting will surely start soon. They’ll reduce aircraft, employees and routes."
losing the flights would be devastating. perhaps they will just take away ORD.
no way in hell that they take away the flights. they are all almost at capacity and they are full of people flying on fed govt money with more fed govt money and people getting ready to move in.
Quote from: rick daris on November 29, 2011, 12:00:02 PMno way in hell that they take away the flights. they are all almost at capacity and they are full of people flying on fed govt money with more fed govt money and people getting ready to move in. yes they would. just because a flight is full doesn't mean they're making any money on it. rough ridin' idiots.
Quote from: pissclams on November 29, 2011, 12:20:24 PMQuote from: rick daris on November 29, 2011, 12:00:02 PMno way in hell that they take away the flights. they are all almost at capacity and they are full of people flying on fed govt money with more fed govt money and people getting ready to move in. yes they would. just because a flight is full doesn't mean they're making any money on it. rough ridin' idiots.then why would they have added routes to both ord and dfw? not all flights may be full, but the fact that they're adding additional flights on particular routes is a great indicator that the lanes are making money.
Quote from: pissclams on November 29, 2011, 12:20:24 PMQuote from: rick daris on November 29, 2011, 12:00:02 PMno way in hell that they take away the flights. they are all almost at capacity and they are full of people flying on fed govt money with more fed govt money and people getting ready to move in. yes they would. just because a flight is full doesn't mean they're making any money on it. rough ridin' idiots.maybe you skipped over the bolded part or maybe you're just a complete dolt that doesn't understand much about anything related to what we are talking about. i'm not sure and i don't care. i did bold the important part of the post that you quoted. i'll let you attempt to figure the rest out.
Quote from: EllToPay on November 29, 2011, 12:25:19 PMQuote from: pissclams on November 29, 2011, 12:20:24 PMQuote from: rick daris on November 29, 2011, 12:00:02 PMno way in hell that they take away the flights. they are all almost at capacity and they are full of people flying on fed govt money with more fed govt money and people getting ready to move in. yes they would. just because a flight is full doesn't mean they're making any money on it. rough ridin' idiots.then why would they have added routes to both ord and dfw? not all flights may be full, but the fact that they're adding additional flights on particular routes is a great indicator that the lanes are making money.hey gordon gecko, you're a rough ridin' idioti just stated that a full flight does not indicate a profitable flight. figure it out turdball.
Quote from: rick daris on November 29, 2011, 12:27:12 PMQuote from: pissclams on November 29, 2011, 12:20:24 PMQuote from: rick daris on November 29, 2011, 12:00:02 PMno way in hell that they take away the flights. they are all almost at capacity and they are full of people flying on fed govt money with more fed govt money and people getting ready to move in. yes they would. just because a flight is full doesn't mean they're making any money on it. rough ridin' idiots.maybe you skipped over the bolded part or maybe you're just a complete dolt that doesn't understand much about anything related to what we are talking about. i'm not sure and i don't care. i did bold the important part of the post that you quoted. i'll let you attempt to figure the rest out. try to keep up. did you fall on your face this morning? i hope so, might do you some good.
Quote from: pissclams on November 29, 2011, 12:28:30 PMQuote from: rick daris on November 29, 2011, 12:27:12 PMQuote from: pissclams on November 29, 2011, 12:20:24 PMQuote from: rick daris on November 29, 2011, 12:00:02 PMno way in hell that they take away the flights. they are all almost at capacity and they are full of people flying on fed govt money with more fed govt money and people getting ready to move in. yes they would. just because a flight is full doesn't mean they're making any money on it. rough ridin' idiots.maybe you skipped over the bolded part or maybe you're just a complete dolt that doesn't understand much about anything related to what we are talking about. i'm not sure and i don't care. i did bold the important part of the post that you quoted. i'll let you attempt to figure the rest out. try to keep up. did you fall on your face this morning? i hope so, might do you some good.maybe you could start a thread about happy hour flights of beer and/or wine at various plaza eateries instead of mucking the adult conversation that the adults are having in this thread.
Do we all agree that MHK's elite status isn't going anywhere?I mean, we have NBAF. That should account for something, right?RIGHT?!