Manhattan International Airport Master Thread

[steve dave]

 

[ednksu]

how dare you move this to one of the 'other' boards.  This has serious implications for football recruiting!!!!

[steve dave]

how dare you move this to one of the 'other' boards.  This has serious implications for football recruiting!!!!

no it doesn't.  I suggest you brush up on your airline bankruptcy history.

[EllToPay]

this means absolutely nothing to you or the average flier.

[ednksu]

no crap people 

[bakerman]

http://bottomline.msnbc.msn.com/_news/2011/11/29/9088501-american-airlines-files-for-bankruptcy-protection

 

[SkinnyBenny]

Bit airline industry analyst Seth Kaplan of Airline Weekly thinks otherwise. "Cuts will come," he said. "They’ve said everything is normal for now, but the cutting will surely start soon. They’ll reduce aircraft, employees and routes."

 

[steve dave]

 

[Kat Kid]

Threat level green!

[SkinnyBenny]

<---will take SD reassurances more seriously if they include insider-y terms like "AA metal" more than if it's just a guy snoring

[fatty fat fat]

losing the flights would be devastating. perhaps they will just take away ORD.

[SkinnyBenny]

Would be preferable.

[steve dave]

losing the flights would be devastating. perhaps they will just take away ORD.

It may get changed up but they aren't going to stop flying sold out routes.  AA has put off the spin off of AE until some time in 2012.  Will be more interesting to see how AE moves forward from there.  That would be the bigger concern imo. 

[Dr Rick Daris]

no way in hell that they take away the flights. they are all almost at capacity and they are full of people flying on fed govt money with more fed govt money and people getting ready to move in.

[SkinnyBenny]

So any updates about direct flights to/from Jackson Hole like that one guy asked about a little bit ago?

[pissclams]

no way in hell that they take away the flights. they are all almost at capacity and they are full of people flying on fed govt money with more fed govt money and people getting ready to move in.

yes they would.  just because a flight is full doesn't mean they're making any money on it.  rough ridin' idiots.

[EllToPay]

no way in hell that they take away the flights. they are all almost at capacity and they are full of people flying on fed govt money with more fed govt money and people getting ready to move in.

yes they would.  just because a flight is full doesn't mean they're making any money on it.  rough ridin' idiots.

then why would they have added routes to both ord and dfw? not all flights may be full, but the fact that they're adding additional flights on particular routes is a great indicator that the lanes are making money.

[Dr Rick Daris]

no way in hell that they take away the flights. they are all almost at capacity and they are full of people flying on fed govt money with more fed govt money and people getting ready to move in.

yes they would.  just because a flight is full doesn't mean they're making any money on it.  rough ridin' idiots.

maybe you skipped over the bolded part or maybe you're just a complete dolt that doesn't understand much about anything related to what we are talking about. i'm not sure and i don't care. i did bold the important part of the post that you quoted. i'll let you attempt to figure the rest out.  

[pissclams]

no way in hell that they take away the flights. they are all almost at capacity and they are full of people flying on fed govt money with more fed govt money and people getting ready to move in.

yes they would.  just because a flight is full doesn't mean they're making any money on it.  rough ridin' idiots.

then why would they have added routes to both ord and dfw? not all flights may be full, but the fact that they're adding additional flights on particular routes is a great indicator that the lanes are making money.

hey gordon gecko, you're a rough ridin' idiot
i just stated that a full flight does not indicate a profitable flight.  figure it out turdball.

[pissclams]

no way in hell that they take away the flights. they are all almost at capacity and they are full of people flying on fed govt money with more fed govt money and people getting ready to move in.

yes they would.  just because a flight is full doesn't mean they're making any money on it.  rough ridin' idiots.

maybe you skipped over the bolded part or maybe you're just a complete dolt that doesn't understand much about anything related to what we are talking about. i'm not sure and i don't care. i did bold the important part of the post that you quoted. i'll let you attempt to figure the rest out. 

try to keep up.  did you fall on your face this morning?  i hope so, might do you some good.

[SkinnyBenny]

no way in hell that they take away the flights. they are all almost at capacity and they are full of people flying on fed govt money with more fed govt money and people getting ready to move in.

yes they would.  just because a flight is full doesn't mean they're making any money on it.  rough ridin' idiots.

then why would they have added routes to both ord and dfw? not all flights may be full, but the fact that they're adding additional flights on particular routes is a great indicator that the lanes are making money.

hey gordon gecko, you're a rough ridin' idiot
i just stated that a full flight does not indicate a profitable flight.  figure it out turdball.

figure it out turdball.

[Dr Rick Daris]

no way in hell that they take away the flights. they are all almost at capacity and they are full of people flying on fed govt money with more fed govt money and people getting ready to move in.

yes they would.  just because a flight is full doesn't mean they're making any money on it.  rough ridin' idiots.

maybe you skipped over the bolded part or maybe you're just a complete dolt that doesn't understand much about anything related to what we are talking about. i'm not sure and i don't care. i did bold the important part of the post that you quoted. i'll let you attempt to figure the rest out. 

try to keep up.  did you fall on your face this morning?  i hope so, might do you some good.

maybe you could start a thread about happy hour flights of beer and/or wine at various plaza eateries instead of mucking the adult conversation that the adults are having about actual plane flights in this thread.

[pissclams]

no way in hell that they take away the flights. they are all almost at capacity and they are full of people flying on fed govt money with more fed govt money and people getting ready to move in.

yes they would.  just because a flight is full doesn't mean they're making any money on it.  rough ridin' idiots.

maybe you skipped over the bolded part or maybe you're just a complete dolt that doesn't understand much about anything related to what we are talking about. i'm not sure and i don't care. i did bold the important part of the post that you quoted. i'll let you attempt to figure the rest out. 

try to keep up.  did you fall on your face this morning?  i hope so, might do you some good.

maybe you could start a thread about happy hour flights of beer and/or wine at various plaza eateries instead of mucking the adult conversation that the adults are having in this thread.

and maybe you can try to keep up.  put your helmet back on, mongoloid, you have issues.

[DQ12]

Do we all agree that MHK's elite status isn't going anywhere?

I mean, we have NBAF.  That should account for something, right?

RIGHT?!

[steve dave]

Do we all agree that MHK's elite status isn't going anywhere?

I mean, we have NBAF.  That should account for something, right?

RIGHT?!

yeah, I wouldn't get too worked up about this