You can tell someone is losing an argument when they tell the other side what they believe.
"I'm not going to argue with what you're saying, I'm going to argue with what I say you believe!"
this makes me sad
if it is true then it means Dax never wins
but really though Dax why do you support this use of executive overrreach?
because of poor guatemalans?
So in your world immigration and national security does not fall under the executive branch?
The "poor Guatemalans" falls on deaf ears because I'll just redirect you back to your guy lovin all over those Central American thugs running those countries.
You are complicit in helping to create those "poor Guatemalans".
so for future discourse you believe this to be a legitimate use of the "national emergency" declaration?
First of all, it's absolutely pathetic (but not at all unexpected) that resident LibDerps never want to talk about the root cause.
Congress has had ample time to act. Think about it (well, let me think about it for your, since you won't) . . . you guys have absolutely melted down about the border but your only solution is just an open border free-for-all (and then to be able to go out and run on that with legions of new voters . . . weirdly, LibDerp Nation always forgets about the impact of local elections and the ascendance to power . . . which likely driven by the fact that numerous icons of the Lib movement ascended to power on the back of voter fraud in local elections . . . but I digress).
The president has asked for comprehensive immigration reform and the best that's been come up with is idiocy: Insta-Amnesty and additional mechanisms which only play straight into the hands of the traffickers. Like the idiocy of the expanded sponsorship status in this current bill.