Author Topic: Remember the Kavanaugh!! Republican war cry in defeating ruthless Dems (Read 101118 times)

420seriouscat69 · « **Reply #1025 on:** October 05, 2018, 04:47:12 PM »

Quote from: Spracne on October 05, 2018, 04:40:31 PM

Gotta be TBT. I doubt anyone reads more than one lost from that sock.

Sent from my SM-G955U using Tapatalk

My god, his conspiracy theory post...

DaBigTrain · « **Reply #1026 on:** October 05, 2018, 04:50:02 PM »

Added yet another sock to the growing list of ones I supposedly control

gatoveintisiet · « **Reply #1027 on:** October 05, 2018, 08:11:41 PM »

As a sock, I have awoke in the middle of the night in a cold sweat terrified that I will make a post bad enough to be accused of being controlled by tbt

420seriouscat69 · « **Reply #1028 on:** October 06, 2018, 01:20:36 AM »

DC cat: “show me a link to the Clinton’s mass murdering ppl for their political agenda”

Also DC Cat: “Kavanaugh is a serial rapist!”

????

chum1 · « **Reply #1029 on:** October 06, 2018, 06:40:15 AM »

https://twitter.com/Amy_Siskind/status/1048412515921776640

DaBigTrain · « **Reply #1030 on:** October 06, 2018, 06:41:44 AM »

Quote from: WackyCat08 on October 06, 2018, 01:20:36 AM

DC cat: “show me a link to the Clinton’s mass murdering ppl for their political agenda”

Also DC Cat: “Kavanaugh is a serial rapist!”

I posted that body bag picture meaning you caught me you dingleberry.

bucket · « **Reply #1031 on:** October 06, 2018, 02:44:31 PM »

In all seriousness. My biggest concern has been that a supreme court nominee has failed to be honest, but expects to be confirmed. How would he look on a defendant who fails to be honest?

renocat · « **Reply #1032 on:** October 06, 2018, 03:38:00 PM »

Women should be angry about how special interest leftist groups high jacked the #MeToo movement and all of the good arising from it to push their causes. How much has this damaged the growing support for women to come forward when assaulted. What the did this have to do with abortions or gay rights or women gaining power or old white men.
Instead these loonies have caused great harm to civility and discourse.
They need to trash and holler at Avenitti and Hillary. They are the evil.

bucket · « **Reply #1033 on:** October 06, 2018, 05:13:35 PM »

https://twitter.com/npfandos/status/1048695010529566721

Man, I'd sure like a guy like Cocaine Mitch on my team.

catastrophe · « **Reply #1034 on:** October 06, 2018, 05:20:04 PM »

Quote from: bucket on October 06, 2018, 02:44:31 PM

In all seriousness. My biggest concern has been that a supreme court nominee has failed to be honest, but expects to be confirmed. How would he look on a defendant who fails to be honest?

Supreme Court justices are pretty much never responsible for determining witness credibility.

bucket · « **Reply #1035 on:** October 06, 2018, 05:25:45 PM »

Quote from: catastrophe on October 06, 2018, 05:20:04 PM

Quote from: bucket on October 06, 2018, 02:44:31 PM
In all seriousness. My biggest concern has been that a supreme court nominee has failed to be honest, but expects to be confirmed. How would he look on a defendant who fails to be honest?

Supreme Court justices are pretty much never responsible for determining witness credibility.

A judge is.

Spracne · « **Reply #1036 on:** October 06, 2018, 05:43:11 PM »

Quote from: bucket on October 06, 2018, 05:25:45 PM

Quote from: catastrophe on October 06, 2018, 05:20:04 PM
Quote from: bucket on October 06, 2018, 02:44:31 PM
In all seriousness. My biggest concern has been that a supreme court nominee has failed to be honest, but expects to be confirmed. How would he look on a defendant who fails to be honest?

Supreme Court justices are pretty much never responsible for determining witness credibility.

A judge is.

So you agree he's better suited as a Justice than a judge, then?

Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

bucket · « **Reply #1037 on:** October 06, 2018, 05:44:53 PM »

Quote from: Spracne on October 06, 2018, 05:43:11 PM

Quote from: bucket on October 06, 2018, 05:25:45 PM
Quote from: catastrophe on October 06, 2018, 05:20:04 PM
Quote from: bucket on October 06, 2018, 02:44:31 PM
In all seriousness. My biggest concern has been that a supreme court nominee has failed to be honest, but expects to be confirmed. How would he look on a defendant who fails to be honest?

Supreme Court justices are pretty much never responsible for determining witness credibility.

A judge is.

So you agree he's better suited as a Justice than a judge, then?

Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

Is a Supreme Court justice not a judge of judges?

Spracne · « **Reply #1038 on:** October 06, 2018, 05:51:49 PM »

Quote from: bucket on October 06, 2018, 05:44:53 PM

Quote from: Spracne on October 06, 2018, 05:43:11 PM
Quote from: bucket on October 06, 2018, 05:25:45 PM
Quote from: catastrophe on October 06, 2018, 05:20:04 PM
Quote from: bucket on October 06, 2018, 02:44:31 PM
In all seriousness. My biggest concern has been that a supreme court nominee has failed to be honest, but expects to be confirmed. How would he look on a defendant who fails to be honest?

Supreme Court justices are pretty much never responsible for determining witness credibility.

A judge is.

So you agree he's better suited as a Justice than a judge, then?

Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

Is a Supreme Court justice not a judge of judges?

Sometimes, yes. But that's not what you said? Talking to you is already tiresome.

bucket · « **Reply #1039 on:** October 06, 2018, 05:59:12 PM »

Quote from: Spracne on October 06, 2018, 05:51:49 PM

Quote from: bucket on October 06, 2018, 05:44:53 PM
Quote from: Spracne on October 06, 2018, 05:43:11 PM
Quote from: bucket on October 06, 2018, 05:25:45 PM
Quote from: catastrophe on October 06, 2018, 05:20:04 PM
Quote from: bucket on October 06, 2018, 02:44:31 PM
In all seriousness. My biggest concern has been that a supreme court nominee has failed to be honest, but expects to be confirmed. How would he look on a defendant who fails to be honest?

Supreme Court justices are pretty much never responsible for determining witness credibility.

A judge is.

So you agree he's better suited as a Justice than a judge, then?

Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

Is a Supreme Court justice not a judge of judges?

Sometimes, yes. But that's not what you said? Talking to you is already tiresome.

I'm a simple guy. I stand by my original statement. Lying doesn't fly in court. A judge isn't going to stand for it. Brett lied his ass off and was just appointed to the highest court in the land. That's what I have a problem with.

john "teach me how to" dougie · « **Reply #1040 on:** October 06, 2018, 09:41:10 PM »

Quote from: bucket on October 06, 2018, 05:59:12 PM

Quote from: Spracne on October 06, 2018, 05:51:49 PM
Quote from: bucket on October 06, 2018, 05:44:53 PM
Quote from: Spracne on October 06, 2018, 05:43:11 PM
Quote from: bucket on October 06, 2018, 05:25:45 PM
Quote from: catastrophe on October 06, 2018, 05:20:04 PM
Quote from: bucket on October 06, 2018, 02:44:31 PM
In all seriousness. My biggest concern has been that a supreme court nominee has failed to be honest, but expects to be confirmed. How would he look on a defendant who fails to be honest?

Supreme Court justices are pretty much never responsible for determining witness credibility.

A judge is.

So you agree he's better suited as a Justice than a judge, then?

Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

Is a Supreme Court justice not a judge of judges?

Sometimes, yes. But that's not what you said? Talking to you is already tiresome.

I'm a simple guy. I stand by my original statement. Lying doesn't fly in court. A judge isn't going to stand for it. Brett lied his ass off and was just appointed to the highest court in the land. That's what I have a problem with.

This is just your opinion.

Rage Against the McKee · « **Reply #1041 on:** October 07, 2018, 11:12:02 AM »

It's the opinion of anyone who doesn't have crap for brains.

gatoveintisiet · « **Reply #1042 on:** October 07, 2018, 11:39:32 AM »

You have just failed my litmus test and are dead to me, k bye

420seriouscat69 · « **Reply #1043 on:** October 07, 2018, 01:57:09 PM »

How many losses can the libs take at this point?

sys · « **Reply #1044 on:** October 07, 2018, 02:12:28 PM »

this was a win, i think. we'll find out in a month or so.

sys · « **Reply #1045 on:** October 07, 2018, 03:58:44 PM »

dumbass scientists not even trying to measure how convenient it was to believe she mumped up the face memory.

https://twitter.com/ericuman/status/1048955501332111360

catastrophe · « **Reply #1046 on:** October 07, 2018, 05:05:56 PM »

Yeah that’s a weird thing to believe IMO unless you believe she was pretty drunk and didn’t ID the person in the moment.

sonofdaxjones · « **Reply #1047 on:** October 07, 2018, 05:57:32 PM »

LibBots: We're digging deep and will never question why Ford didn't come forward years earlier

wetwillie · « **Reply #1048 on:** October 07, 2018, 05:59:39 PM »

Hopefully some bureaucratic hero leaks the full fbi report so this thread wasn’t in vain. Was Chris Garrett dating Ford?!

sonofdaxjones · « **Reply #1049 on:** October 07, 2018, 06:03:05 PM »

https://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing-room/news/410185-kagan-warns-supreme-court-may-not-have-a-swing-vote-anymore

Translation: I view SCOTUS as a political body