Author Topic: Are Gay relationships morally acceptable? (Read 11577 times)

Brock Landers · « **Reply #3 on:** May 25, 2010, 05:11:36 PM »

Depends on what they look like. Much easier to accept if you picture 2 smokin' hot chicks together.

Cire · « **Reply #4 on:** May 25, 2010, 07:45:31 PM »

looks like God will give them rights soon.

Dirty Sanchez · « **Reply #5 on:** May 25, 2010, 09:31:40 PM »

Quote from: Cire on May 25, 2010, 07:45:31 PM

looks like God will give them rights soon.

They have rights already.

Cire · « **Reply #6 on:** May 25, 2010, 09:51:24 PM »

Quote from: Dirty Sanchez on May 25, 2010, 09:31:40 PM

Quote from: Cire on May 25, 2010, 07:45:31 PM
looks like God will give them rights soon.

They have rights already.

they don't have the right to be married in kansas.

Dirty Sanchez · « **Reply #7 on:** May 25, 2010, 09:54:19 PM »

Quote from: Cire on May 25, 2010, 09:51:24 PM

Quote from: Dirty Sanchez on May 25, 2010, 09:31:40 PM
Quote from: Cire on May 25, 2010, 07:45:31 PM
looks like God will give them rights soon.

They have rights already.

they don't have the right to be married in kansas.

two straight men or straight women can't do that either.

Cire · « **Reply #8 on:** May 25, 2010, 09:54:56 PM »

hahahahaha

AzCat · « **Reply #9 on:** May 26, 2010, 01:12:54 AM »

Pack all the fudge you like KK, I doubt anyone really cares.

Sugar Dick · « **Reply #10 on:** June 02, 2010, 10:00:51 PM »

Quote from: Cire on May 25, 2010, 07:45:31 PM

looks like God will give them rights soon.

AIDS???

pike · « **Reply #11 on:** June 02, 2010, 10:48:38 PM »

Quote from: Dirty Sanchez on May 25, 2010, 09:54:19 PM

Quote from: Cire on May 25, 2010, 09:51:24 PM
Quote from: Dirty Sanchez on May 25, 2010, 09:31:40 PM
Quote from: Cire on May 25, 2010, 07:45:31 PM
looks like God will give them rights soon.

They have rights already.

they don't have the right to be married in kansas.

two straight men or straight women can't do that either.

ha

Kat Kid · « **Reply #12 on:** June 03, 2010, 01:37:39 AM »

Very stupid that any one can't form a legal partnership with someone so they can get hospital visitations, streamlined legal rights etc. All the more reason why the govt should be out of the marriage business and out of the ridic tax subsidy business.

Dirty Sanchez · « **Reply #13 on:** June 03, 2010, 06:58:57 AM »

Quote from: Mr. KK on June 03, 2010, 01:37:39 AM

Very stupid that any one can't form a legal partnership with someone so they can get hospital visitations, streamlined legal rights etc. All the more reason why the govt should be out of the marriage business and out of the ridic tax subsidy business.

but should be about the rest of our business, amirite?!!?!

john "teach me how to" dougie · « **Reply #14 on:** June 03, 2010, 09:01:05 AM »

KK wants smaller government.

Festus the Purple Swan · « **Reply #15 on:** June 03, 2010, 01:14:38 PM »

Love is love.

It was love that resurrected Jesus.
It was love that enlightened Buddha.
It was love that made Prometheus steal the flame.

Love surrounds us all and expresses itself in ways that no one can contain.

Love is never wrong.

DQ12 · « **Reply #16 on:** June 03, 2010, 01:17:31 PM »

Quote from: Festus the Purple Swan on June 03, 2010, 01:14:38 PM

Love is love.

It was love that resurrected Jesus.
It was love that enlightened Buddha.
It was love that made Prometheus steal the flame.

Love surrounds us all and expresses itself in ways that no one can contain.

Love is never wrong.

Beautiful

steve dave · « **Reply #17 on:** June 03, 2010, 01:53:35 PM »

Very attractive and great smelling bunch ((I'm too stupid to find a better word than gay) guys)

Festus the Purple Swan · « **Reply #18 on:** June 03, 2010, 02:15:00 PM »

Quote from: Dlew12 on June 03, 2010, 01:17:31 PM

Quote from: Festus the Purple Swan on June 03, 2010, 01:14:38 PM
Love is love.

It was love that resurrected Jesus.
It was love that enlightened Buddha.
It was love that made Prometheus steal the flame.

Love surrounds us all and expresses itself in ways that no one can contain.

Love is never wrong.

Beautiful

Thank you!

Quote from: steve dave on June 03, 2010, 01:53:35 PM

Very attractive and great smelling bunch ((I'm too stupid to find a better word than gay) guys)

Don't forget fun. The most fun you will ever have in your life will include at least one gay person.

steve dave · « **Reply #19 on:** June 03, 2010, 02:21:54 PM »

Quote from: Festus the Purple Swan on June 03, 2010, 02:15:00 PM

Quote from: steve dave on June 03, 2010, 01:53:35 PM
Very attractive and great smelling bunch ((I'm too stupid to find a better word than gay) guys)
Don't forget fun. The most fun you will ever have in your life will include at least one gay person.

yeah

OK_Cat · « **Reply #20 on:** June 03, 2010, 02:25:23 PM »

Totally. My cousin lives with a bunch of gay guys (they're all music majors), and I went to a party at their house once. Way more entertaining than a "regular" party. Love when they call each other "queens" or say "get it, girl"

SkinnyBenny · « **Reply #21 on:** June 05, 2010, 11:22:31 AM »

Love the dim-witted douche nozzles who go, "gay men already DO have the right to marry! ....Women!" Well yeah obviously. But,
A) When gay-rights advocates say that gay people should have the right to marry, there's an implicit "whomever they love" that follows.
B) Because a gay man entering into a fraudulent marriage with a woman that is based entirely on lies and receiving specific benefits is somehow more okay?

jmlynch1 · « **Reply #22 on:** June 05, 2010, 11:46:50 AM »

Quote from: SkinnyBenny on June 05, 2010, 11:22:31 AM

Love the dim-witted douche nozzles who go, "gay men already DO have the right to marry! ....Women!" Well yeah obviously. But,
A) When gay-rights advocates say that gay people should have the right to marry, there's an implicit "whomever they love" that follows.
B) Because a gay man entering into a fraudulent marriage with a woman that is based entirely on lies and receiving specific benefits is somehow more okay?

Personally, I prefer my sham marriages to be centered around citizenship.

Havs · « **Reply #23 on:** June 07, 2010, 12:10:59 AM »

Quote from: Cire on May 25, 2010, 09:51:24 PM

Quote from: Dirty Sanchez on May 25, 2010, 09:31:40 PM
Quote from: Cire on May 25, 2010, 07:45:31 PM
looks like God will give them rights soon.

They have rights already.

they don't have the right to be married in kansas.

I take it Iowa is a much more accepting state when it comes to legal unions. Same-sex 'marriage' has been legal in Iowa now for a year. I don't have a problem with it because marriage in the church and marriage with the state are two different things anyway. The marriage that is allowed between two of the same sex in Iowa is with the state and is basically a legal formality for power of attourny and all other things 'legal.' The marriage that 'counts' IMO is in the church, where it is up to the specific church/religion's discrepancy on whether two of the same sex can 'marry.' Personally, I'm Catholic, and I don't think the Catholic Church should marry two of the same sex. However, I think the US Government should allow legal unions for the 'legal' marriage because the debate on same-sex marriage is based upon a person's morals and religion, not the law.

Kat Kid · « **Reply #24 on:** June 07, 2010, 06:21:42 AM »

Havs well said. This is a fight for liberty against tyranny.

Author Topic: Are Gay relationships morally acceptable? (Read 11577 times)

Sugar Dick