Author Topic: SNL  (Read 40109 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline MakeItRain

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 44804
    • View Profile
Re: SNL
« Reply #500 on: May 23, 2022, 01:14:39 PM »
Also, lol, MIR. Your prime posting hours are between 3-4 am. Why are you trying to act like your insomnia ass just can't do 10:30 pm cst on Saturday night. :lol: :lol:

I don't watch any network television, that isn't sports or an awards show live, not even the news. As I said, I stopped watching SNL live in high school, when I had better crap to do on Saturday nights.

Offline 420seriouscat69

  • Don't get zapped! #zap
  • Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 63922
  • #1 rated - gE NFL Scout
    • View Profile
Re: SNL
« Reply #501 on: May 23, 2022, 01:15:16 PM »
 :lol:

Offline Spracne

  • Point Plank'r
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *
  • Posts: 20950
  • Scholar/Gentleman, But Super Earthy/Organic
    • View Profile
Re: SNL
« Reply #502 on: May 23, 2022, 01:23:04 PM »
Do these ratings take into account all the folks who just watch every sketch on YouTube on Sunday, Monday, etc.? Because that's ... a lot of folks.

Offline MakeItRain

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 44804
    • View Profile
Re: SNL
« Reply #503 on: May 23, 2022, 01:36:53 PM »
Do these ratings take into account all the folks who just watch every sketch on YouTube on Sunday, Monday, etc.? Because that's ... a lot of folks.

Nope. Especially, late night network TV now tries to track how viral they are instead of their ratings. The ratings for the four weeknight shows are virtually non-existent but they pay these guys; Kimmel, Fallon, Colbert, and Corden for their ability to be viral. SNL is a bit different because it's weekly, they get more ad revenue, but for the most part the ability to go viral is much more important.

Offline XocolateThundarr

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 5220
    • View Profile
Re: SNL
« Reply #504 on: May 23, 2022, 01:38:10 PM »
I thought the opening skit was pretty funny.
@mikec2w

Offline Dugout DickStone

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 51305
  • BSPAC
    • View Profile
Re: SNL
« Reply #505 on: May 24, 2022, 11:16:59 AM »
I thought the opening skit was pretty funny.

way too woke.  It enraged me

Offline 420seriouscat69

  • Don't get zapped! #zap
  • Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 63922
  • #1 rated - gE NFL Scout
    • View Profile
Re: SNL
« Reply #506 on: May 27, 2022, 02:57:15 PM »
Which sketch?  I was watching the incredibly woke NBA (which is killing).

NBA did a great job following the NFL.  It is paying off
https://twitter.com/condorszn/status/1529935262821892097?s=21&t=fN0sk2yxYbeV4iYPALsXCQ

Offline DreamWeaver69

  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 2128
    • View Profile

Online WillieWatanabe

  • PCKK7DC Survivor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *******
  • Posts: 19275
  • We'll always have Salt Lake
    • View Profile
Re: SNL
« Reply #508 on: November 17, 2022, 09:21:59 PM »
Sometimes I think of the Book of Job and how God likes to really eff with people.
- chunkles

Offline bucket

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 9524
    • View Profile
Re: SNL
« Reply #509 on: November 29, 2022, 10:16:05 PM »

Offline DreamWeaver69

  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 2128
    • View Profile

Offline DreamWeaver69

  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 2128
    • View Profile
Re: SNL
« Reply #511 on: January 19, 2023, 10:46:34 AM »

Offline Spracne

  • Point Plank'r
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *
  • Posts: 20950
  • Scholar/Gentleman, But Super Earthy/Organic
    • View Profile
Re: SNL
« Reply #512 on: January 19, 2023, 10:55:56 AM »
If a jury finds him guilty of the elements of the crime, so be it. But also, STFU Fanning.

Offline DreamWeaver69

  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 2128
    • View Profile
Re: SNL
« Reply #513 on: January 19, 2023, 11:00:44 AM »
 :lol:

Offline Spracne

  • Point Plank'r
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *
  • Posts: 20950
  • Scholar/Gentleman, But Super Earthy/Organic
    • View Profile
Re: SNL
« Reply #514 on: January 19, 2023, 11:04:21 AM »
You're a flaming idiot. It is known.

Offline DreamWeaver69

  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 2128
    • View Profile
Re: SNL
« Reply #515 on: January 19, 2023, 11:08:41 AM »
Everything ok, bud?! :frown: Super weird meltdown. Even for you.
« Last Edit: January 19, 2023, 11:20:37 AM by DreamWeaver69 »

Offline Gooch

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 9492
    • View Profile
Re: SNL
« Reply #516 on: January 19, 2023, 11:09:03 AM »
The precedent that could be set here is pretty significant. As an actor you are responsible for a prop gun handed to you is wild. A lot of these doofs won't even know how to check to see if it's loaded with actual bullets.

Offline DreamWeaver69

  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 2128
    • View Profile
Re: SNL
« Reply #517 on: January 19, 2023, 12:05:28 PM »
Sending him to jail is the least they can do for making SNL so unfunny for so many years.

Offline MakeItRain

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 44804
    • View Profile
Re: SNL
« Reply #518 on: January 19, 2023, 09:20:38 PM »
The precedent that could be set here is pretty significant. As an actor you are responsible for a prop gun handed to you is wild. A lot of these doofs won't even know how to check to see if it's loaded with actual bullets.

Yeah, exactly this. The DA said she charged him because she talked to other actors and they supposedly always checked every time a weapon was in their hands or visually saw someone else check. There's no way that's true and I'm stunned that the DA was that gullible and actually went public with that reasoning. I'm also confused as to why she made it a point to talk about him being charged as a producer, because the set was not safe, but didn't charge the director as well.

Either way, it's an involuntary manslaughter charge, he won't spend a second in jail, and unless there's some other gross negligence that comes to light, the DA won't even ask for jail time.

Offline DreamWeaver69

  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 2128
    • View Profile
Re: SNL
« Reply #519 on: January 19, 2023, 10:08:00 PM »
So many Baldwin Fans in here. I never thought I’d see the day!  :love:

Offline Brock Landers

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 7072
    • View Profile
Re: SNL
« Reply #520 on: January 19, 2023, 11:06:00 PM »
Wacky wants a guy to go to jail because his Trump impersonation wasn't good.

Offline DreamWeaver69

  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 2128
    • View Profile
Re: SNL
« Reply #521 on: January 19, 2023, 11:17:22 PM »
Wacky wants a guy to go to jail because his Trump impersonation wasn't good.
I just think it’s ironic he spent all of that energy hating someone he doesn’t know. No one is questioning his antics on scene, because of course, and he’ll spend more jail time than the dork he impersonated. Kinda hilarious!

Offline MakeItRain

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 44804
    • View Profile
Re: SNL
« Reply #522 on: January 19, 2023, 11:44:06 PM »
Wacky wants a guy to go to jail because his Trump impersonation wasn't good.
I just think it’s ironic he spent all of that energy hating someone he doesn’t know. No one is questioning his antics on scene, because of course, and he’ll spend more jail time than the dork he impersonated. Kinda hilarious!

Wacky, the DA already said she isn't seeking jail time.

Offline DreamWeaver69

  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 2128
    • View Profile
Re: SNL
« Reply #523 on: January 19, 2023, 11:48:34 PM »
Wacky wants a guy to go to jail because his Trump impersonation wasn't good.
I just think it’s ironic he spent all of that energy hating someone he doesn’t know. No one is questioning his antics on scene, because of course, and he’ll spend more jail time than the dork he impersonated. Kinda hilarious!

Wacky, the DA already said she isn't seeking jail time.
K.why are you here then?

Offline OK_Cat

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 16212
  • Hey
    • View Profile
Re: SNL
« Reply #524 on: January 20, 2023, 11:27:31 AM »
I don't think that anyone is defending Baldwin, it's more that it's a terrible idea to charge an actor for something that someone else is supposed to be handling.