Author Topic: 2011 take a big or quit debate thread  (Read 10569 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline sys

  • Contributor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 40815
  • your reputation will never recover, nor should it.
    • View Profile
2011 take a big or quit debate thread
« on: May 21, 2010, 10:41:58 AM »
so here's yosh's very cogent point to get started.

Quote
Agreed.  Right now, if Judge leaves early, we'd be looking at going into the 12 class needing to fill basically the enitre frontcourt.

so, yeah, that's the huge risk, if judge leaves as a jr. you're looking at going into 2012 with all new bigs plus jh-r.  scary.


i'll take the other side of the debate, whether i believe it or not:  the 2011 class is poor in bigs, and kstate isn't mentioned with any that are any good.  they only have 2 left to give, and it'd be easy to fill those with fall 2011 guards.  williams and southwell have decent size to give some post minutes, if necessary.  the 2012 class probably has the best group of 3 bigs ks has ever produced (has ks ever had 3 high major bigs come out in the same year?).  nationwide, the 2012 class is deep with bigs too.  should be much easier to sell bigs in 2012 than 2011.  any 2011 big is going to come in knowing he has very little opportunity for minutes as a freshman.


(Want to get rid of the ad? Register now for free!)
"a garden city man wondered in april if the theologians had not made a mistake in locating the garden of eden in asia rather than in the arkansas river valley."

Offline CNS

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 38099
  • I'm Athletes
    • View Profile
Re: 2011 take a big or quit debate thread
« Reply #1 on: May 21, 2010, 10:48:50 AM »
so here's yosh's very cogent point to get started.

Quote
Agreed.  Right now, if Judge leaves early, we'd be looking at going into the 12 class needing to fill basically the enitre frontcourt.

so, yeah, that's the huge risk, if judge leaves as a jr. you're looking at going into 2012 with all new bigs plus jh-r.  scary.


i'll take the other side of the debate, whether i believe it or not:  the 2011 class is poor in bigs, and kstate isn't mentioned with any that are any good.  they only have 2 left to give, and it'd be easy to fill those with fall 2011 guards.  williams and southwell have decent size to give some post minutes, if necessary.  the 2012 class probably has the best group of 3 bigs ks has ever produced (has ks ever had 3 high major bigs come out in the same year?).  nationwide, the 2012 class is deep with bigs too.  should be much easier to sell bigs in 2012 than 2011.  any 2011 big is going to come in knowing he has very little opportunity for minutes as a freshman.

Staff counting too much on Willy Cauley(sp)?

Problem with waiting is: 1. obviously getting surprised if someone leaves early, and 2. bringing in new guys that will have to contribute right away and them sucking.

Offline michigancat

  • Contributor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 55969
  • change your stupid avatar.
    • View Profile
Re: 2011 take a big or quit debate thread
« Reply #2 on: May 21, 2010, 10:56:33 AM »
I say get the best Juco big available in the fall.

Offline Dr Rick Daris

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 23381
    • View Profile
Re: 2011 take a big or quit debate thread
« Reply #3 on: May 21, 2010, 10:59:36 AM »


 if judge leaves as a jr. you're looking at going into 2012 with all new bigs plus jh-r.  scary.




asprilla?

Offline michigancat

  • Contributor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 55969
  • change your stupid avatar.
    • View Profile
Re: 2011 take a big or quit debate thread
« Reply #4 on: May 21, 2010, 11:02:33 AM »


 if judge leaves as a jr. you're looking at going into 2012 with all new bigs plus jh-r.  scary.




asprilla?

:nono:

Offline sys

  • Contributor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 40815
  • your reputation will never recover, nor should it.
    • View Profile
Re: 2011 take a big or quit debate thread
« Reply #5 on: May 21, 2010, 11:02:40 AM »
I say get the best Juco big available in the fall.

that adds to the already giant 2013 class.  currently at 6, would put it at 7 with a juco.  a transfer might work better.


i'd love a class with williams, 2 good guards in the fall and a transfer big in the spring.
"a garden city man wondered in april if the theologians had not made a mistake in locating the garden of eden in asia rather than in the arkansas river valley."

Offline sys

  • Contributor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 40815
  • your reputation will never recover, nor should it.
    • View Profile
Re: 2011 take a big or quit debate thread
« Reply #6 on: May 21, 2010, 11:03:56 AM »
asprilla?

asprilla-perea.  did you know there's an elite 2012 colombian big whose first last name is perea?
"a garden city man wondered in april if the theologians had not made a mistake in locating the garden of eden in asia rather than in the arkansas river valley."

Offline michigancat

  • Contributor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 55969
  • change your stupid avatar.
    • View Profile
Re: 2011 take a big or quit debate thread
« Reply #7 on: May 21, 2010, 11:04:42 AM »
I say get the best Juco big available in the fall.

that adds to the already giant 2013 class.  currently at 6, would put it at 7 with a juco.  a transfer might work better.


i'd love a class with williams, 2 good guards in the fall and a transfer big in the spring.

that would be good, too.

Offline CNS

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 38099
  • I'm Athletes
    • View Profile
Re: 2011 take a big or quit debate thread
« Reply #8 on: May 21, 2010, 11:05:45 AM »
I say get the best Juco big available in the fall.

that adds to the already giant 2013 class.  currently at 6, would put it at 7 with a juco.  a transfer might work better.


i'd love a class with williams, 2 good guards in the fall and a transfer big in the spring.

2013 really needs to be GRCOAT II.

Offline KSUTOMMY

  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 1575
    • View Profile
Re: 2011 take a big or quit debate thread
« Reply #9 on: May 21, 2010, 11:45:31 AM »
so here's yosh's very cogent point to get started.

Quote
Agreed.  Right now, if Judge leaves early, we'd be looking at going into the 12 class needing to fill basically the enitre frontcourt.

so, yeah, that's the huge risk, if judge leaves as a jr. you're looking at going into 2012 with all new bigs plus jh-r.  scary.


i'll take the other side of the debate, whether i believe it or not:  the 2011 class is poor in bigs, and kstate isn't mentioned with any that are any good.  they only have 2 left to give, and it'd be easy to fill those with fall 2011 guards.  williams and southwell have decent size to give some post minutes, if necessary.  the 2012 class probably has the best group of 3 bigs ks has ever produced (has ks ever had 3 high major bigs come out in the same year?).  nationwide, the 2012 class is deep with bigs too.  should be much easier to sell bigs in 2012 than 2011.  any 2011 big is going to come in knowing he has very little opportunity for minutes as a freshman.

Joe Leonard?  :lol:
We are K-State and we love to hire SHlTTY coaches.

Offline yosh

  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 1003
    • View Profile
Re: 2011 take a big or quit debate thread
« Reply #10 on: May 21, 2010, 01:46:56 PM »
Too bad Sprilla burned his redshirt.  All appearances are that we are not taking a big this fall, but it seems foolish to me.  The really odd part is that the staff, historically, seems to prioritize elite bigs when recruiting while they will settle for second and third tier recruits for the backcourt.   :dunno:
« Last Edit: May 21, 2010, 01:53:12 PM by yosh »

catzacker

  • Guest
Re: 2011 take a big or quit debate thread
« Reply #11 on: May 21, 2010, 02:04:24 PM »


i'll take the other side of the debate, whether i believe it or not:  the 2011 class is poor in bigs, and kstate isn't mentioned with any that are any good.  they only have 2 left to give, and it'd be easy to fill those with fall 2011 guards.  williams and southwell have decent size to give some post minutes, if necessary.  the 2012 class probably has the best group of 3 bigs ks has ever produced (has ks ever had 3 high major bigs come out in the same year?).  nationwide, the 2012 class is deep with bigs too.  should be much easier to sell bigs in 2012 than 2011.  any 2011 big is going to come in knowing he has very little opportunity for minutes as a freshman.

?
Cauley
Ellis
Wilson

Odds that we land even one of them?

Offline sys

  • Contributor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 40815
  • your reputation will never recover, nor should it.
    • View Profile
Re: 2011 take a big or quit debate thread
« Reply #12 on: May 21, 2010, 05:57:25 PM »
?
Cauley
Ellis
Wilson

Odds that we land even one of them?

mccullough too, if he grows.  i forgot him.
 

Quote
MoKan has at least 7 D1 players

 :surprised:
"a garden city man wondered in april if the theologians had not made a mistake in locating the garden of eden in asia rather than in the arkansas river valley."

Offline yosh

  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 1003
    • View Profile
Re: 2011 take a big or quit debate thread
« Reply #13 on: July 07, 2010, 09:50:14 PM »
Bump

11-12 roster as it looks now:
PG: Myles, Irving  :barf:
SG: Russell, Spradling  :blank:
SF: McGruder, Southwell, Williams, Lawrence  <<---3 sophs   :confused:
PF: Samuels, Judge
C: Aprilla, J-Hen

One scholly left for fall.

Offline pissclams

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 47966
  • (worst non-premium poster at goEMAW.com)
    • View Profile
Re: 2011 take a big or quit debate thread
« Reply #14 on: July 07, 2010, 10:10:03 PM »
Frank doesn't use a traditional PG-SG set-up, Yosh.  I wouldn't get too hung up on it.


Cheesy Mustache QB might make an appearance.

New warning: Don't get in a fight with someone who doesn't even need to bother to buy ink.

Offline michigancat

  • Contributor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 55969
  • change your stupid avatar.
    • View Profile
Re: 2011 take a big or quit debate thread
« Reply #15 on: July 07, 2010, 11:44:32 PM »
Frank doesn't use a traditional PG-SG set-up, Yosh.  I wouldn't get too hung up on it.

he read my "pure point" post on ksufans.  It's pretty much been his guidepost throughout his career.

Offline sys

  • Contributor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 40815
  • your reputation will never recover, nor should it.
    • View Profile
Re: 2011 take a big or quit debate thread
« Reply #16 on: July 08, 2010, 02:48:27 AM »
Bump

11-12 roster as it looks now:
PG: Myles, Irving  :barf:
SG: Russell, Spradling  :blank:
SF: McGruder, Southwell, Williams, Lawrence  <<---3 sophs   :confused:
PF: Samuels, Judge
C: Aprilla, J-Hen

One scholly left for fall.


gotta get a pg.  i don't care if you don't have a single big with experience in '12, you gotta get a pg that can play.
"a garden city man wondered in april if the theologians had not made a mistake in locating the garden of eden in asia rather than in the arkansas river valley."

Offline wabashcannonball

  • Fan
  • *
  • Posts: 133
    • View Profile
Re: 2011 take a big or quit debate thread
« Reply #17 on: July 08, 2010, 03:41:58 AM »
Bump

11-12 roster as it looks now:
PG: Myles, Irving  :barf:
SG: Russell, Spradling  :blank:
SF: McGruder, Southwell, Williams, Lawrence  <<---3 sophs   :confused:
PF: Samuels, Judge
C: Aprilla, J-Hen

One scholly left for fall.


gotta get a pg.  i don't care if you don't have a single big with experience in '12, you gotta get a pg that can play.

Juevol Myles can play  :crossfingers:

 :dunno:

Offline steve dave

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 88615
  • Romantic Fist Attachment
    • View Profile
Re: 2011 take a big or quit debate thread
« Reply #18 on: July 08, 2010, 07:21:14 AM »
Gotta get either Seag or Boat at this point.  We have no shot at Quinn and Angel sounds like he may be garbage. 

Offline mcmwcat

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 5313
  • trips: "MCMW"
    • View Profile
Re: 2011 take a big or quit debate thread
« Reply #19 on: July 08, 2010, 07:32:17 AM »
Gotta get either Seag or Boat at this point.  We have no shot at Quinn and Angel sounds like he may be garbage. 

seagers  :pray:

Offline pissclams

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 47966
  • (worst non-premium poster at goEMAW.com)
    • View Profile
Re: 2011 take a big or quit debate thread
« Reply #20 on: July 08, 2010, 10:17:56 AM »
Frank doesn't use a traditional PG-SG set-up, Yosh.  I wouldn't get too hung up on it.

he read my "pure point" post on ksufans.  It's pretty much been his guidepost throughout his career.
OMFG I think you're right. 

note to michigancat:  pls post more on how to recruit studs

note to frank: pls CONTINUE to read michi's posts


Cheesy Mustache QB might make an appearance.

New warning: Don't get in a fight with someone who doesn't even need to bother to buy ink.

Offline JMart

  • Fan
  • *
  • Posts: 235
    • View Profile
Re: 2011 take a big or quit debate thread
« Reply #21 on: July 08, 2010, 10:35:36 AM »
Two days ago, they weren't looking at bigs. Yesterday, the edict was a guard and a big.

Carry on...

Offline steve dave

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 88615
  • Romantic Fist Attachment
    • View Profile
Re: 2011 take a big or quit debate thread
« Reply #22 on: July 08, 2010, 10:37:39 AM »
Two days ago, they weren't looking at bigs. Yesterday, the edict was a guard and a big.

Carry on...

 :surprised:

Offline sys

  • Contributor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 40815
  • your reputation will never recover, nor should it.
    • View Profile
Re: 2011 take a big or quit debate thread
« Reply #23 on: July 08, 2010, 10:37:52 AM »
Two days ago, they weren't looking at bigs. Yesterday, the edict was a guard and a big.

Carry on...

does this mean they will oversign?   :excited:


but why a last second change?
"a garden city man wondered in april if the theologians had not made a mistake in locating the garden of eden in asia rather than in the arkansas river valley."

Offline yosh

  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 1003
    • View Profile
Re: 2011 take a big or quit debate thread
« Reply #24 on: July 08, 2010, 10:41:41 AM »
Two days ago, they weren't looking at bigs. Yesterday, the edict was a guard and a big.

Carry on...

does this mean they will oversign?   :excited:


but why a last second change?

Most likely because I bumped this thread.  Indisputable proof that the staff reads this board.   :users: