0 Members and 20 Guests are viewing this topic.
Grassley accused Glenn Simpson, a co-founder of Fusion GPS, of possibly lying during his Aug. 22, 2017 testimony when he claimed that his firm was not working for a client to investigate President Donald Trump after the 2016 election.“So you didn’t do any work on the Trump matter after the election date, that was the end of your work?” Simpson was asked in his deposition.“I had no client after the election,” said Simpson.“As we now know, that was extremely misleading, if not an outright lie,” Grassley asserted in his letter to Blumenthal.Grassley noted that a former Senate staffer named Daniel Jones told the FBI in March 2017 that he hired Fusion GPS and former British spy Christopher Steele, the author of the dossier, after the election to continue an investigation into Trump’s possible ties to Russia.Jones, a former staffer to California Sen. Dianne Feinstein, the top Democrat on the Judiciary panel, told the FBI that he “had secured the services Steele, his associate [redacted], and Fusion GPS to continue exposing Russian interference in the 2016 Presidential election.”Jones also said that the group “was being funded by 7 to 10 wealthy donors located primarily in New York and California, who provided approximately $50 million.”The goal of the group was to pass information to lawmakers, the FBI and the press, Jones told the FBI.“Contrary to Mr. Simpson’s denial in the staff interview, according to the FBI and others, Fusion actually did continue Trump dossier work for a new client after the election,” said Grassley.
Haha. Playing the hits.https://twitter.com/bubbaprog/status/1070136871743881216
Criminal investigation testimony that is redacted is nothing substantial Don’t ever change FSD
Quote from: Cat from DC on December 04, 2018, 08:08:47 PMCriminal investigation testimony that is redacted is nothing substantial Don’t ever change FSD Without more, no. There are many, many reasons why there could be redactions, other than "looks bad for Trump". But keep up the good work, Choo Choo.
Quote from: Spracne on December 04, 2018, 08:51:09 PMQuote from: Cat from DC on December 04, 2018, 08:08:47 PMCriminal investigation testimony that is redacted is nothing substantial Don’t ever change FSD Without more, no. There are many, many reasons why there could be redactions, other than "looks bad for Trump". But keep up the good work, Choo Choo.Trump’s public defender to the rescue.
Quote from: Cat from DC on December 04, 2018, 08:52:46 PMQuote from: Spracne on December 04, 2018, 08:51:09 PMQuote from: Cat from DC on December 04, 2018, 08:08:47 PMCriminal investigation testimony that is redacted is nothing substantial Don’t ever change FSD Without more, no. There are many, many reasons why there could be redactions, other than "looks bad for Trump". But keep up the good work, Choo Choo.Trump’s public defender to the rescue.Trump, either himself or by directing others, has undoubtedly committed crimes. I'm simply trying to improve your logic and add clarity to the public discourse by cautioning laypersons to avoid making the same mistake as you did. Have a blessed day.
Quote from: Spracne on December 04, 2018, 08:57:24 PMQuote from: Cat from DC on December 04, 2018, 08:52:46 PMQuote from: Spracne on December 04, 2018, 08:51:09 PMQuote from: Cat from DC on December 04, 2018, 08:08:47 PMCriminal investigation testimony that is redacted is nothing substantial Don’t ever change FSD Without more, no. There are many, many reasons why there could be redactions, other than "looks bad for Trump". But keep up the good work, Choo Choo.Trump’s public defender to the rescue.Trump, either himself or by directing others, has undoubtedly committed crimes. I'm simply trying to improve your logic and add clarity to the public discourse by cautioning laypersons to avoid making the same mistake as you did. Have a blessed day.I’m sure he appreciates it very much. His army of defenders are just trying to give him a fair shake. You will undoubtedly be rewarded.
Quote from: Cat from DC on December 04, 2018, 09:00:08 PMQuote from: Spracne on December 04, 2018, 08:57:24 PMQuote from: Cat from DC on December 04, 2018, 08:52:46 PMQuote from: Spracne on December 04, 2018, 08:51:09 PMQuote from: Cat from DC on December 04, 2018, 08:08:47 PMCriminal investigation testimony that is redacted is nothing substantial Don’t ever change FSD Without more, no. There are many, many reasons why there could be redactions, other than "looks bad for Trump". But keep up the good work, Choo Choo.Trump’s public defender to the rescue.Trump, either himself or by directing others, has undoubtedly committed crimes. I'm simply trying to improve your logic and add clarity to the public discourse by cautioning laypersons to avoid making the same mistake as you did. Have a blessed day.I’m sure he appreciates it very much. His army of defenders are just trying to give him a fair shake. You will undoubtedly be rewarded.Uh huh. Sure bud. As always, I'm simply trying to restore balance to the force. And fair. Fair and balanced.
https://twitter.com/evan_rosenfeld/status/1070419490645651462
He's totally innocent and unhinged, wow
Quote from: libliblibliblibliblib on December 07, 2018, 07:33:16 AMHe's totally innocent and unhinged, wowhe's losing his entire crap
