None of that "evidence" is new information. While the resident Libs absolutely lose their mind whenever this is brought up. But if the "evidence" is that of COLUSION with Russia on the part of the Trump campaign. Then there's more then enough evidence to investigate the DNC and the Clinton Campaign for colluding with Russia as well. S
The Clinton's and their fake foundation were clear financial benefactors from multiple Russian entities to the tune of millions of dollars. There's also evidence to roll in the Ukraine and the Ukrainian government helping the Clinton Campaign and the DNC. Of course in the case of the Ukraine, all the pro Lib publications have fallen all over themselves to "prove" that there's nothing to that. It's amazing the amount of explaining that's occurred over the last two decades to protect the Clinton's. Everyone's coughing up lungs with smoke inhalation, but amazingly the ProgLib media just never seems to find that fire when it comes to the Clinton.
Then of course there's the dossier, the use of paid foreign nationals who used Russian sources . . . and now the growing evidence that Clapper-Comey-Brennan concocted a scheme to ensure the dossier would make it into the public domain via a "legitimate" news source, CNN. In the case of Clapper-Comey-Brennan ProgLibs have done an historical 180 and are now all-in on leaders of entities that they used to despise (and still do if a 'Pub is President) . ProgLibs willl no doubt clamor to a whole new sub-set of the usual suspects who will attempt to explain in great detail how there's nothing to any of that. Clapper sure does get all jumpy, though.
