Author Topic: Barnes  (Read 17923 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Gooch

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 9491
    • View Profile
Re: Barnes
« Reply #25 on: December 27, 2016, 12:59:49 PM »
This staff could give oscar a run for his money on their inability to manage talent.

Offline bucket

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 10176
    • View Profile
Re: Barnes
« Reply #26 on: December 27, 2016, 01:06:39 PM »
This staff could give oscar a run for his money on their inability to manage talent.

DO NOT compare Bill to Oscar!  :dubious:

Offline 420seriouscat69

  • Don't get zapped! #zap
  • Wackycat
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 63922
  • #1 rated - gE NFL Scout
    • View Profile
Re: Barnes
« Reply #27 on: December 27, 2016, 01:35:28 PM »
Lol at thinking he'll transfer just because he had a disagreement with coaches.

i wouldn't bet on it happening but it's not as outrageous as you may think
That's fine, but having that be the first thing that comes to your mind, is a bit ridiculous. Not all players are divas, that wanna run after their first disagreement. Barnes body language has never suggested he's ready to get the hell out of town, but I know nothing that happens behind closed doors.

Offline kim carnes

  • chingon!
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 13843
    • View Profile
Re: Barnes
« Reply #28 on: December 27, 2016, 01:47:01 PM »
This staff could give oscar a run for his money on their inability to manage talent.

DO NOT compare Bill to Oscar!  :dubious:

Why?  What has bill accomplished that weber hasn't?

Offline SdK

  • Libertine
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 20951
    • View Profile
Re: Barnes
« Reply #29 on: December 27, 2016, 01:51:35 PM »
Lmao good one Bette

Offline Trim

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 42622
  • Pfizer PLUS Moderna and now Pfizer Bivalent
    • View Profile
Re: Barnes
« Reply #30 on: December 27, 2016, 01:52:12 PM »
I'm not sure if I can handle all this Barnes suspense another day.

Offline troubledscribe

  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 1674
    • View Profile
Re: Barnes
« Reply #31 on: December 27, 2016, 02:02:18 PM »

Offline 420seriouscat69

  • Don't get zapped! #zap
  • Wackycat
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 63922
  • #1 rated - gE NFL Scout
    • View Profile
Re: Barnes
« Reply #32 on: December 27, 2016, 02:06:10 PM »
Meh

Offline kso_FAN

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 29506
    • View Profile
Re: Barnes
« Reply #33 on: December 27, 2016, 02:49:51 PM »

Offline star seed 7

  • hyperactive on the :lol:
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 67432
  • good dog
    • View Profile
Re: Barnes
« Reply #34 on: December 27, 2016, 02:53:17 PM »
Yeah, this all seems made up. The people who think our staff is any degree more malicious to the athletes than any other average staff are weird.
Hyperbolic partisan duplicitous hypocrite

Offline TheHamburglar

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 5967
    • View Profile
Re: Barnes
« Reply #35 on: December 27, 2016, 03:19:09 PM »
Yeah, this all seems made up. The people who think our staff is any degree more malicious to the athletes than any other average staff are weird.

I don't think our staff is more malicious.  I think our staff has a system and a history of handing situations a certain way, including making an example out of those with better natural talent that don't "work harder" than everyone else.  They suck at and generally don't give a crap about recruiting.  In turn, they work their players harder than most, which results in some under developed players and their bodies responding by turning into legit P5 players/bodies.

On the other hand, some player's bodies can't withstand that workload while maintaining their full health.  A faction of our fans base, for some stupid reason, takes pride in other people's work ethic and label players like Barnes as divas and cancers.  The coaches are doing what they think is in their best long term interest.  This system seems detrimental to Barnes and his performance and getting on the field.  If he thinks he has a shot at 1 year on an NFL roster and this system keeps getting him hurt, I wouldn't blame him at all for looking out for his best interest and leaving. 
« Last Edit: December 27, 2016, 03:24:36 PM by TheHamburglar »
I got a guy on the other line about some white walls

Offline sonofdaxjones

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 59503
    • View Profile
Re: Barnes
« Reply #36 on: December 27, 2016, 03:19:51 PM »
Yeah, this all seems made up. The people who think our staff is any degree more malicious to the athletes than any other average staff are weird.

What's even more weird is the substantial portion of our fan base who buy the whole Grandpa Bill shtick hook-line-sinker.   Prop's to Bill for that, I suppose.


Offline star seed 7

  • hyperactive on the :lol:
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 67432
  • good dog
    • View Profile
Re: Barnes
« Reply #37 on: December 27, 2016, 03:28:32 PM »
Yeah, this all seems made up. The people who think our staff is any degree more malicious to the athletes than any other average staff are weird.

What's even more weird is the substantial portion of our fan base who buy the whole Grandpa Bill shtick hook-line-sinker.   Prop's to Bill for that, I suppose.

Less to as weird.
Hyperbolic partisan duplicitous hypocrite

Offline 420seriouscat69

  • Don't get zapped! #zap
  • Wackycat
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 63922
  • #1 rated - gE NFL Scout
    • View Profile
Re: Barnes
« Reply #38 on: December 27, 2016, 03:33:21 PM »
I think all that Barnes was saying in his tweet, is that he's already jacked as mother rough rider!


Offline pvegs

  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 2198
    • View Profile
Re: Barnes
« Reply #39 on: December 27, 2016, 04:25:33 PM »
 Can someone tell me wth is actually going on?

Offline Trim

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 42622
  • Pfizer PLUS Moderna and now Pfizer Bivalent
    • View Profile
Re: Barnes
« Reply #40 on: December 27, 2016, 04:27:28 PM »
Can someone tell me wth is actually going on?

A KSU running back may or may not play.  One of many intriguing storylines leading into tomorrow's advocare v100 texas bowl.

Offline star seed 7

  • hyperactive on the :lol:
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 67432
  • good dog
    • View Profile
Re: Barnes
« Reply #41 on: December 27, 2016, 05:07:36 PM »
Topeka classic rock station v100 is sponsoring our bowl? Lol
Hyperbolic partisan duplicitous hypocrite

Offline pvegs

  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 2198
    • View Profile
Re: Barnes
« Reply #42 on: December 27, 2016, 07:41:27 PM »
Can someone tell me wth is actually going on?

A KSU running back may or may not play.  One of many intriguing storylines leading into tomorrow's advocare v100 texas bowl.

thx for the clarification. what would you say are the other most intriguing storylines? that we once lost to the ags in 1998? that v100 in topeka is a sponsor?

Offline TheHamburglar

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 5967
    • View Profile
Re: Barnes
« Reply #43 on: December 27, 2016, 07:48:59 PM »
Can someone tell me wth is actually going on?

A KSU running back may or may not play.  One of many intriguing storylines leading into tomorrow's advocare v100 texas bowl.

thx for the clarification. what would you say are the other most intriguing storylines? that we once lost to the ags in 1998? that v100 in topeka is a sponsor?

I'm sure you heard, but KSU won the rodeo portion of the event.
I got a guy on the other line about some white walls

Offline Trim

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 42622
  • Pfizer PLUS Moderna and now Pfizer Bivalent
    • View Profile
Re: Barnes
« Reply #44 on: December 27, 2016, 07:49:19 PM »
Can someone tell me wth is actually going on?

A KSU running back may or may not play.  One of many intriguing storylines leading into tomorrow's advocare v100 texas bowl.

thx for the clarification. what would you say are the other most intriguing storylines? that we once lost to the ags in 1998? that v100 in topeka is a sponsor?

Quote
Historically, the Rodeo Bowl winner has fared well in the actual football game. Rodeo Bowl officials said seven of the last eight winners of the cowboy-themed competition came out on top in the Texas Bowl.

Offline Trim

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 42622
  • Pfizer PLUS Moderna and now Pfizer Bivalent
    • View Profile
Re: Barnes
« Reply #45 on: December 27, 2016, 07:51:47 PM »
In fairness, since I sarcastically posted that breakdown, I learned that Barnes is a poor man's Jalen Hurd, so now I'm as interested in how this plays out as anything this whole season.

Offline Steffy08

  • Racist Piece of Shit
  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 1292
    • View Profile
Re: Barnes
« Reply #46 on: December 27, 2016, 08:46:33 PM »
Yeah, this all seems made up. The people who think our staff is any degree more malicious to the athletes than any other average staff are weird.

I don't think our staff is more malicious.  I think our staff has a system and a history of handing situations a certain way, including making an example out of those with better natural talent that don't "work harder" than everyone else.  They suck at and generally don't give a crap about recruiting.  In turn, they work their players harder than most, which results in some under developed players and their bodies responding by turning into legit P5 players/bodies.

On the other hand, some player's bodies can't withstand that workload while maintaining their full health.  A faction of our fans base, for some stupid reason, takes pride in other people's work ethic and label players like Barnes as divas and cancers.  The coaches are doing what they think is in their best long term interest.  This system seems detrimental to Barnes and his performance and getting on the field.  If he thinks he has a shot at 1 year on an NFL roster and this system keeps getting him hurt, I wouldn't blame him at all for looking out for his best interest and leaving.

Tries too hard to be edgy, ends up saying stupid stuff.

Offline 420seriouscat69

  • Don't get zapped! #zap
  • Wackycat
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 63922
  • #1 rated - gE NFL Scout
    • View Profile
Re: Barnes
« Reply #47 on: December 27, 2016, 09:08:39 PM »
There's nothing to see here btw. A+ source.

Offline sonofdaxjones

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 59503
    • View Profile
Re: Barnes
« Reply #48 on: December 27, 2016, 10:38:59 PM »
Thanks WackyTuck!

Offline pvegs

  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 2198
    • View Profile
Re: Barnes
« Reply #49 on: December 27, 2016, 10:44:04 PM »
In fairness, since I sarcastically posted that breakdown, I learned that Barnes is a poor man's Jalen Hurd, so now I'm as interested in how this plays out as anything this whole season.

i do no know who jalen hurd is, but barnes is p. good. hope he plays. jmho.