Author Topic: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football  (Read 101956 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline cfbandyman

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 9508
  • To da 'ville.
    • View Profile
A&M Style: 1/19/13 Co-Champion of THE ED's College Basketball Challenge

The art of the deal with it poors

OG Elon hater with a tesla


Offline 420seriouscat69

  • Don't get zapped! #zap
  • Wackycat
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 63922
  • #1 rated - gE NFL Scout
    • View Profile
Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
« Reply #201 on: September 10, 2016, 02:41:16 PM »
Omg!!! Central Michigan!

Online Tobias

  • Fattyfest Champion
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 29155
  • hypoclique lieutenant
    • View Profile
Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
« Reply #202 on: September 10, 2016, 02:41:54 PM »
FSD, what shall we drink to celebrate #osutears?

Offline MixBerryCrunch

  • Señor Vol
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 3745
  • Anybody want a peanut?
    • View Profile
Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
« Reply #203 on: September 10, 2016, 02:44:11 PM »
crap that was crazy
Hello, my name is Inigo Montoya. You killed my father. Prepare to die.

Offline star seed 7

  • hyperactive on the :lol:
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 64279
  • good dog
    • View Profile
Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
« Reply #204 on: September 10, 2016, 02:44:43 PM »
time to get lit #fuckosu
Hyperbolic partisan duplicitous hypocrite

Offline HELLHAMMER

  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 1374
  • BO DARVILLE'S STUNT DOUBLE
    • View Profile
Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
« Reply #205 on: September 10, 2016, 02:45:19 PM »
Mike Gundy deserves to rot in hell.
High on Crack, Toting a Machine Gun

Offline MixBerryCrunch

  • Señor Vol
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 3745
  • Anybody want a peanut?
    • View Profile
Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
« Reply #206 on: September 10, 2016, 02:47:01 PM »
Odds that game is shown as a win in next year's OSU football guide?
Hello, my name is Inigo Montoya. You killed my father. Prepare to die.

Offline kso_FAN

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 29506
    • View Profile
Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
« Reply #207 on: September 10, 2016, 02:47:11 PM »
Unbelievable ending there. Poor OSU.

Offline Kat Kid

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 20533
    • View Profile
Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
« Reply #208 on: September 10, 2016, 02:47:31 PM »
that was amazing.

I still think the Auburn FG return was crazier event to watch live but that was very crazy.

Offline catastrophe

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 15268
    • View Profile
Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
« Reply #209 on: September 10, 2016, 03:03:22 PM »
Amazing finish to that one. Not sure the embarrassment to the Big 12 was worth the excitement of the game, tho.

Offline steve dave

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 85494
  • Romantic Fist Attachment
    • View Profile
Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
« Reply #210 on: September 10, 2016, 03:04:55 PM »
wait, should they not have gotten that down? like the rules say they shouldn't have?

Offline star seed 7

  • hyperactive on the :lol:
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 64279
  • good dog
    • View Profile
Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
« Reply #211 on: September 10, 2016, 03:06:18 PM »
the cdubya's are tied with youngstown state at half smdh
Hyperbolic partisan duplicitous hypocrite

Offline star seed 7

  • hyperactive on the :lol:
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 64279
  • good dog
    • View Profile
Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
« Reply #212 on: September 10, 2016, 03:09:16 PM »
the cdubya's are tied with youngstown state at half smdh

pelini is at ysu, is mangino still there?  i don't remember
Hyperbolic partisan duplicitous hypocrite

Offline Dugout DickStone

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 51718
  • BSPAC
    • View Profile
Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
« Reply #213 on: September 10, 2016, 03:09:42 PM »
wait, should they not have gotten that down? like the rules say they shouldn't have?

that is what loser OSU fans saying

Offline cfbandyman

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 9508
  • To da 'ville.
    • View Profile
Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
« Reply #214 on: September 10, 2016, 03:11:24 PM »
This conference sucks ass this year
A&M Style: 1/19/13 Co-Champion of THE ED's College Basketball Challenge

The art of the deal with it poors

OG Elon hater with a tesla


Offline kso_FAN

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 29506
    • View Profile
Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
« Reply #215 on: September 10, 2016, 03:16:21 PM »
wait, should they not have gotten that down? like the rules say they shouldn't have?

https://twitter.com/mikepereira/status/774696457353895936

Offline Trim

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 42022
  • Pfizer PLUS Moderna and now Pfizer Bivalent
    • View Profile
Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
« Reply #216 on: September 10, 2016, 03:20:15 PM »
Is that "and" supposed to say "in?"

Offline Kat Kid

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 20533
    • View Profile
Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
« Reply #217 on: September 10, 2016, 03:28:34 PM »
I wish Baylor and Ohio St. would score a bunch of points and win already.

Offline BackPayne

  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 2458
    • View Profile
Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
« Reply #218 on: September 10, 2016, 03:55:53 PM »
crap, Baylor!

Offline michigancat

  • Contributor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 53910
  • change your stupid avatar.
    • View Profile
Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
« Reply #219 on: September 10, 2016, 04:15:25 PM »
Buncha garbage games today

Offline MixBerryCrunch

  • Señor Vol
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 3745
  • Anybody want a peanut?
    • View Profile
Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
« Reply #220 on: September 10, 2016, 04:21:57 PM »
wait, should they not have gotten that down? like the rules say they shouldn't have?

https://twitter.com/mikepereira/status/774696457353895936

Based on the context the enforcing of that rule would be awful though. If the penalty comes on a fourth down and the result would be a change of possession, then the game should be extended for one play. You shouldn't be able to end the game on offense with a penalty.
Hello, my name is Inigo Montoya. You killed my father. Prepare to die.

Offline kso_FAN

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 29506
    • View Profile
Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
« Reply #221 on: September 10, 2016, 04:24:09 PM »
wait, should they not have gotten that down? like the rules say they shouldn't have?

https://twitter.com/mikepereira/status/774696457353895936

Based on the context the enforcing of that rule would be awful though. If the penalty comes on a fourth down and the result would be a change of possession, then the game should be extended for one play. You shouldn't be able to end the game on offense with a penalty.

Yes, it was a very odd situation and I wondered about that too.

Offline wetwillie

  • goEMAW Poster of the WEEK
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 30579
    • View Profile
Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
« Reply #222 on: September 10, 2016, 04:25:07 PM »
Buncha garbage games today

SD State vs Cal I think will be good tonight
When the bullets are flying, that's when I'm at my best

Offline cfbandyman

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 9508
  • To da 'ville.
    • View Profile
Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
« Reply #223 on: September 10, 2016, 04:46:26 PM »
Guys, Baylor is tied 6-6, TCU will probably be rolled by Arky. Just BID
A&M Style: 1/19/13 Co-Champion of THE ED's College Basketball Challenge

The art of the deal with it poors

OG Elon hater with a tesla


Offline jmlynch1

  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 2781
  • stay together for the kids
    • View Profile
Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
« Reply #224 on: September 10, 2016, 04:57:53 PM »
wait, should they not have gotten that down? like the rules say they shouldn't have?

https://twitter.com/mikepereira/status/774696457353895936

Based on the context the enforcing of that rule would be awful though. If the penalty comes on a fourth down and the result would be a change of possession, then the game should be extended for one play. You shouldn't be able to end the game on offense with a penalty.

Yes, it was a very odd situation and I wondered about that too.
Not saying that the extra down should've been allowed, but the original intent of that rule must have meant if you actually lose a down right? Otherwise that is a really weird gift to the team making the penalty.
« Last Edit: September 10, 2016, 05:09:48 PM by jmlynch1 »