goemaw.com

TITLETOWN - A Decade Long Celebration Of The Greatest Achievement In College Athletics History => Kansas State Football => Topic started by: KCFDcat on September 01, 2016, 08:15:00 PM

Title: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: KCFDcat on September 01, 2016, 08:15:00 PM
Uh, app state beating tenn at the half?! :love:
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: bubbles4ksu on September 01, 2016, 08:19:22 PM
tenn. got a #1 vote in the coaches poll
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: The Big Train on September 01, 2016, 08:25:38 PM
Louisville RB is having a video game stats type of debut. 8 TD's in the first half
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: TownieCat on September 01, 2016, 08:32:50 PM
I get like 300 channels and none of them are SECNetwork :curse:
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: TownieCat on September 01, 2016, 08:34:19 PM
Louisville RB is having a video game stats type of debut. 8 TD's in the first half
Yeah, pretty crazy that UL's RB has 6 passing TDs. :ROFL:
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: TownieCat on September 01, 2016, 08:37:13 PM
Check out this baseball dork trying to talk about football :ROFL:
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: The Big Train on September 01, 2016, 08:37:33 PM
Louisville RB is having a video game stats type of debut. 8 TD's in the first half
Yeah, pretty crazy that UL's RB has 6 passing TDs. :ROFL:

 :curse:

I do have SEC network and wasn't watching it, but you compelled me to switch over.   :cheers:
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: TownieCat on September 01, 2016, 08:38:03 PM
Hey TBT, how many receiving yards does App State's punter have?
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: The Big Train on September 01, 2016, 08:39:17 PM
:frown:
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: Katpappy on September 01, 2016, 08:39:36 PM
Why am I enjoying Tenn U getting their ass kicking by Sun Belt powerhouse App St.  Could it be listening to the ESPN sport casters swallowing their dicks trying to justify an SEC patsies ranked 9th in the preseason. (https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2FgoEMAW.com%2Fforum%2FSmileys%2FgoEMAW%2FROFL.gif&hash=6bba8807037f47549325f7bacc2721aa5071ac45)
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: TownieCat on September 01, 2016, 08:40:03 PM
Louisville RB is having a video game stats type of debut. 8 TD's in the first half
Yeah, pretty crazy that UL's RB has 6 passing TDs. :ROFL:

 :curse:

I do have SEC network and wasn't watching it, but you compelled me to switch over.   :cheers:
:D

:cheers:

I may have to login to Watch ESPN for the 4th quarter if it's still close.
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) on September 01, 2016, 08:42:00 PM
tenn. got a #1 vote in the coaches poll

Has tenn beat anyone good since tee martin?
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: bucket on September 01, 2016, 08:44:20 PM
SEC! SEC! SEC!
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: Katpappy on September 01, 2016, 08:44:58 PM
tenn. got a #1 vote in the coaches poll

Has tenn beat anyone good since tee martin?
I bet most of the 100,000 in attendance are wondering how in the eff is this a top 10 team.
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: The Big Train on September 01, 2016, 08:45:28 PM
Louisville is still scoring TD's, their RB made a position change mid-game and is now playing QB.  Pretty typical stuff I think
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: The Big Train on September 01, 2016, 08:46:02 PM
Good coaching adjustment IMO
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: TownieCat on September 01, 2016, 08:46:31 PM
They never really recovered from the 01 Cotton Bowl. Sad to see them fall this far.
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: Katpappy on September 01, 2016, 08:49:33 PM
They never really recovered from the 01 Cotton Bowl. Sad to see them fall this far.
Now I'm wondering how SEC greats SC & Vanderbilt are doing.
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: TownieCat on September 01, 2016, 08:53:25 PM
From what I've seen so far, the SEC East is Mizzou's to lose.
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: KCFDcat on September 01, 2016, 08:56:28 PM
Would love to know why UT was ranked top ten.  They look really garbage-y
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: Katpappy on September 01, 2016, 08:56:33 PM
From what I've seen so far, the SEC East is Mizzou's to lose.
So sad. (https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2FgoEMAW.com%2Fforum%2FSmileys%2FgoEMAW%2FROFL.gif&hash=6bba8807037f47549325f7bacc2721aa5071ac45)
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: TownieCat on September 01, 2016, 09:08:14 PM
Watching this Tenn-App St game and can't help but think NDSU is a bunch of cowards for not bumping up to FBS.
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: The Big Train on September 01, 2016, 09:10:59 PM
This game is great, all these rocky top fans :lol:
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: BostonPancake on September 01, 2016, 09:17:58 PM
Well, crap.  TD tenn.
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: Super PurpleCat on September 01, 2016, 09:19:15 PM
I'm more bothered by the SEC conference ads on ESPN. 
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: TownieCat on September 01, 2016, 09:42:15 PM
This game is great, all these rocky top fans
The checkered overalls make them look very Iowa St-y
Title: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: The Big Train on September 01, 2016, 09:43:27 PM
With no shirts too :lol:


Big drive here
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: BostonPancake on September 01, 2016, 09:49:44 PM
Horrible clock management by appy st. 
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: The Big Train on September 01, 2016, 09:49:57 PM
:lol: omg what in the rough ridin' world was App St's QB doing
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: The Big Train on September 01, 2016, 10:00:41 PM
God damnit
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: The Big Train on September 01, 2016, 10:01:41 PM
Advancement on a play like that is so sketch
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: TownieCat on September 01, 2016, 10:03:15 PM
Advancement on a play like that is so sketch
The NFL has rules to eliminate that. NCAA needs to adopt them.
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: kim carnes on September 01, 2016, 10:04:19 PM
College football definitely gets lamer as you get older
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: BostonPancake on September 01, 2016, 10:05:51 PM
Well eff
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: The Big Train on September 01, 2016, 10:07:50 PM
Dumb
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: wetwillie on September 01, 2016, 10:08:42 PM
SEC! SEC!
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: Super PurpleCat on September 01, 2016, 10:14:55 PM
Obviously the SEC team was superior tonight.
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: TownieCat on September 01, 2016, 10:17:42 PM
Has Muschamp always been this fat? Dude looks like he puts down 12 Bud heavies per day.
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: The Big Train on September 01, 2016, 10:20:50 PM
https://twitter.com/sonofdaxjones/status/771545142171799553
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: Super PurpleCat on September 01, 2016, 10:23:13 PM
Vandy-like imploding detected.
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: TownieCat on September 01, 2016, 10:24:51 PM
Some dogcrap 8-4 team is going to win the SEC East.
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: The Big Train on September 01, 2016, 10:26:46 PM
Some dogcrap 8-4 team is going to win the SEC East.

And I won't be #Mizzou :lol:
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: TownieCat on September 01, 2016, 10:29:01 PM


Some dogcrap 8-4 team is going to win the SEC East.

And I won't be #Mizzou

LOL nope!
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: The Big Train on September 03, 2016, 11:30:48 AM
I hope WVU just stomps the crap out of Mizzou today
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: MakeItRain on September 03, 2016, 11:34:04 AM
Joe Mixon appears to be better at football than he is punching women, but barely.
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: troubledscribe on September 03, 2016, 11:34:38 AM
Joe Mixon appears to be better at football than he is punching women, but barely.

Very solid at both.
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: The Big Train on September 03, 2016, 11:41:13 AM
Pour it on fighting Cdubs!! :excited:
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: BackPayne on September 03, 2016, 11:45:36 AM
OU is going to piss pound us.
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: The Big Train on September 03, 2016, 11:51:01 AM
Holy crap Perine just got rough ridin' destroyed by that Houston safety
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: SdK on September 03, 2016, 11:52:49 AM
UH looks awful. Glad our conference won't be sullying itself with such dog shitm
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: The Big Train on September 03, 2016, 11:57:01 AM
Holy crap Perine just got rough ridin' destroyed by that Houston safety

https://twitter.com/ryanbridgescfb/status/772115195304878083
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: SdK on September 03, 2016, 12:00:37 PM
Seriously, I wish we would have added UL and UH.
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: wetwillie on September 03, 2016, 12:01:08 PM
UH looks awful. Glad our conference won't be sullying itself with such dog shitm

which game are you watching?
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: SdK on September 03, 2016, 12:01:37 PM
UH looks awful. Glad our conference won't be sullying itself with such dog shitm

which game are you watching?
Houston playing strong and looking like a solid team against OU.
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: SdK on September 03, 2016, 12:02:07 PM
I wanted UL, and I've decided UH would have been a solid second addition.
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: The Big Train on September 03, 2016, 12:04:12 PM
I hope you're putting that in your pipe and smoking it, SDK!
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: BackPayne on September 03, 2016, 12:08:14 PM
This OU game is fun!
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: SdK on September 03, 2016, 12:09:10 PM
I hope you're putting that in your pipe and smoking it, SDK!
I prefer a steamroller, but yes!
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: bucket on September 03, 2016, 12:23:44 PM
Holy crap Perine just got rough ridin' destroyed by that Houston safety

https://twitter.com/ryanbridgescfb/status/772115195304878083

 :dunno:
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: ednksu on September 03, 2016, 01:05:42 PM
Do we need a separate thread for people who want to join the big 12 to see how they are doing? 

Houston is doing well.  That game's refs also know what PI is.
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: SdK on September 03, 2016, 01:07:54 PM
Do we need a separate thread for people who want to join the big 12 to see how they are doing? 

Houston is doing well.  That game's refs also know what PI is.
Yes. PI calls are being made for sure. Probably only reason UH is keeping it close. I vote for seppy thread though. I'll post in it.
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: IPA4Me on September 03, 2016, 01:09:30 PM
And Mizzou still sucks. WV shoving down their throats.
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: ednksu on September 03, 2016, 01:20:25 PM
Houston!  That field goal return!
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: wetwillie on September 03, 2016, 01:40:22 PM
big game bob!
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: ednksu on September 03, 2016, 01:40:35 PM
Will Oklahoma score again this game? 

Will Bob Stoops be fired midseason!
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: ednksu on September 03, 2016, 01:41:48 PM
Really nice to see Harbaugh turn his life around after being turned down at KU.  Can you imagine the awkward conversations in that AD when he would ask to bring in Jumpman to an Adidas school?  No sir! 
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: IPA4Me on September 03, 2016, 01:48:16 PM
Implosion
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: The Big Train on September 03, 2016, 01:50:13 PM
no big 12 in the playoff this year  :frown:
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: ednksu on September 03, 2016, 01:50:28 PM
Obviously Oklahoma is rocked by the news of the devastating earthquake and are in no condition to play football with people suffering at home.
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: BostonPancake on September 03, 2016, 01:52:07 PM
Come on OU.  Pull your head out of your ass.
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: Rage Against the McKee on September 03, 2016, 01:54:35 PM
Come home, Bob.
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: ednksu on September 03, 2016, 02:00:06 PM
Come home, Bob.
wood take as assistant
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: BostonPancake on September 03, 2016, 02:07:02 PM
Crap.  Big 12 left out of playoffs again?
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: ednksu on September 03, 2016, 02:09:56 PM
can we ask KU to politely leave in FB and ask Houston to play their schedule this year? boom, instant playoff team.
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: BostonPancake on September 03, 2016, 02:10:50 PM
PJ Fleck about to get a big road win @northwestern
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: ednksu on September 03, 2016, 02:17:05 PM
OU has fallen into a chasm.
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: BostonPancake on September 03, 2016, 02:23:45 PM
South Alabama beat Mississippi st
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: MakeItRain on September 03, 2016, 02:27:41 PM
PJ Fleck about to get a big road win @northwestern

MY GUY
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: Nick Florences Beard on September 03, 2016, 02:30:40 PM
SEC SEC SEC SEC
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: Nick Florences Beard on September 03, 2016, 02:32:46 PM
Also OU got clown suited today. Their oline is crap.
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: wetwillie on September 03, 2016, 02:33:43 PM
bout to watch the bruincats beat aggie
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: IPA4Me on September 03, 2016, 02:34:20 PM
Cougars throwing the shocker up.
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: MakeItRain on September 03, 2016, 02:35:11 PM
bruincats

wtf? Nah, bruh.
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: wetwillie on September 03, 2016, 02:36:29 PM
forgot A&M got Trevor Knight, this will be fun
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: cfbandyman on September 03, 2016, 05:57:38 PM
Wow, Wisky taking down LSU, and LSU o-lineman is a baby backed bitch on the cheap shot after the pick.
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: wetwillie on September 03, 2016, 06:07:25 PM
Aggie just had a 16 point lead erased in the last 10 minutes of the 4th
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: SdK on September 03, 2016, 07:15:56 PM
Trojancats.
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: SdK on September 03, 2016, 07:16:08 PM
I'm all in.
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: TheHamburglar on September 03, 2016, 07:26:19 PM
The Ohio-Texas St ending was the best I've seen in awhile.
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: cfbandyman on September 03, 2016, 07:27:03 PM
USC looks very fired up and lookin good so far. We'll see how long it lasts.
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: SdK on September 03, 2016, 07:30:46 PM
I mean. We own USC so I'm ok cheering for them.
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: Nick Florences Beard on September 03, 2016, 08:38:00 PM
A USC player just went full Suh.  :sdeek:
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: The Big Train on September 03, 2016, 08:39:19 PM
A USC player just went full Suh.  :sdeek:

Drunk driving on the field :confused:
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: Nick Florences Beard on September 03, 2016, 08:40:10 PM
Intentional foot stomp on a Bama player. He was ejected of course.
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: The Big Train on September 03, 2016, 08:41:51 PM
Yeah I was just being a smartass
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: Nick Florences Beard on September 03, 2016, 08:43:03 PM
TCU  :ROFL:
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: The Big Train on September 03, 2016, 08:47:10 PM
Bama has some roid rage going on in the sideline area right now, wow
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: wetwillie on September 03, 2016, 08:58:48 PM
Was that the guy that got nut stomped?
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: That_Guy on September 03, 2016, 10:31:01 PM
Northern Iowa and our guy, CK about to beat ISU


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: catastrophe on September 03, 2016, 10:37:17 PM
SEC not looking so great, except for clear #1 Bama.
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: BostonPancake on September 03, 2016, 10:40:44 PM
Iowa St.

 :facepalm:
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: cfbandyman on September 03, 2016, 10:43:53 PM
Let's face it, this is a down year for the Big 12, let's just get our QB sitch figured and win this POS conference.
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: catastrophe on September 03, 2016, 10:44:28 PM
ISU has been the third best program in Iowa for a while now.
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: bucket on September 04, 2016, 03:13:31 AM
Quote
Washington State was beaten by Eastern Washington to the tune of 45-42 on Saturday.

Enjoy, Kirk!
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: Big Sam on September 04, 2016, 06:45:26 AM
Quote
Washington State was beaten by Eastern Washington to the tune of 45-42 on Saturday.

Enjoy, Kirk!

Sort of think the qatz got lucky they didn't go after the pirate.

Then again, maybe they will hire him when he comes on the market again.
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: kslim on September 04, 2016, 08:14:45 AM
OSU is going to beat the piss out of OU. Urban is going to go in dry. Lets hope texas has a good showing today or we definitely wont have a team get in the playoff
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: 420seriouscat69 on September 04, 2016, 08:33:48 AM
Big 12 will be fine. Good grief.
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: MakeItRain on September 04, 2016, 08:44:42 AM
Big 12 will be fine. Good grief.

Right. I'm not sure how Houston being better than we thought equates to the Big 12 being dog crap.
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: MixBerryCrunch on September 04, 2016, 08:45:33 AM
Unless OU beats tOSU we aren't getting a team in this year. The Big 12 looks like hot garbage this year, which is good for the Cats.
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: 420seriouscat69 on September 04, 2016, 08:49:28 AM
Tech, Baylor, WVU, and Oklahoma state crush their opponents = dog crap big 12 ????
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: kslim on September 04, 2016, 08:50:17 AM
Big 12 will be fine. Good grief.

Right. I'm not sure how Houston being better than we thought equates to the Big 12 being dog crap.
big picture it does im not only talking about  OU anyone that played a team with a pulse struggled
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: 420seriouscat69 on September 04, 2016, 08:51:22 AM
Iowa State is who they are and Houston is pretty great. Yank yank
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: 420seriouscat69 on September 04, 2016, 08:53:36 AM
West Virginia just beat a SEC team, but yeah, total hot garbage conference. OU is literally the only team who struggled and Houston is pretty great. Like just won the peach bowl vs Florida state kinda great.
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: IPA4Me on September 04, 2016, 08:58:51 AM
It's gE post game meltdown. Nothing new here.
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: 420seriouscat69 on September 04, 2016, 09:15:49 AM
You guys wanna talk about shitty conferences? Miss st lost to south Alabama, LSU to Wisconsin, Northwestern to western Michigan, Washington st to someone, etc. but you guys are right, OU lost to Houston.
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: wetwillie on September 04, 2016, 09:26:27 AM
OU was the best shot the big 12 had at the playoff is what I think people were trying to say.  Someone else could run the table but that doesn't seem likely.   
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: kslim on September 04, 2016, 09:38:09 AM
West Virginia just beat a SEC team, but yeah, total hot garbage conference. OU is literally the only team who struggled and Houston is pretty great. Like just won the peach bowl vs Florida state kinda great.
tcu who a lot of people think have a shot at winning our confrence just gave up almost 50 to an fcs team....and mizzou is horrible and wvu struggled more than that score shows (maybe try actually watching the game) I think houston is a very very good team, i never said they weren't. The best teams in each confrence outside of ours went out and do what they were suppose to do and ours didnt, couple that with #13tcu not looking that great and texas most likely losing tonight and nationally we do look pretty weak. I mean its week one so im not counting anyone out but if our hope is rough ridin' rape u in waco then put a bullet in my head now
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: kim carnes on September 04, 2016, 09:55:25 AM
I agree that the big 12 is not good
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: ednksu on September 04, 2016, 10:09:05 AM
West Virginia just beat a SEC team, but yeah, total hot garbage conference. OU is literally the only team who struggled and Houston is pretty great. Like just won the peach bowl vs Florida state kinda great.
Punch yourself in the dick for propping Mizzou, and WV's win up wit that "SEC team" bullshit.  They were crap here, and crap there. 
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: MakeItRain on September 04, 2016, 10:25:45 AM
OU was the best shot the big 12 had at the playoff is what I think people were trying to say.  Someone else could run the table but that doesn't seem likely.

Why does someone have to run the table? That's pretty unlikely in the Big 12 anyway. ESPN did some kind of simulation and they protect like a 30% chance that there will be a two loss playoff team.
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: MixBerryCrunch on September 04, 2016, 10:40:38 AM
Wacky, good grief. Have some objectivity. WVU beating a terrible team from the SEC East and a few blowout wins against terrible FCS schools is not good by any measure. Oklahoma needed to win  that game and TCU needed to handle SDSU because they are the top two teams and have the best shot at the playoff. Like it or not a conference is judged by its best teams and our best teams didn't show anything this week. If Texas wins tonight we can reevaluate, but as it stands right now the conference looks like dog crap.
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: 420seriouscat69 on September 04, 2016, 10:55:15 AM
I'm not going to meltdown over a TCU W and OU losing to a legit Houston team. Mizzou is 2 years removed from winning the SEC EAST, so sorry for saying meh to all the other bullshit. WVU handled them and it was nice to see. I honestly give two fucks less if we're in the playoff or not. Stoops can get mumped for all I care.
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: catastrophe on September 04, 2016, 11:07:14 AM
Big 12 and Pac 12 teams have to prove more than Big 10 or SEC to get into the playoff. That's just the reality. I don't see any Big 12 team that can do that this year, but I guess we'll see.
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: catastrophe on September 04, 2016, 11:09:26 AM
OU and UT are the only Big 12 teams capable of getting into the playoff with one loss. No Big 12 team can get in with two losses.
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: kslim on September 04, 2016, 11:26:16 AM
I'm not going to meltdown over a TCU W and OU losing to a legit Houston team. Mizzou is 2 years removed from winning the SEC EAST, so sorry for saying meh to all the other bullshit. WVU handled them and it was nice to see. I honestly give two fucks less if we're in the playoff or not. Stoops can get mumped for all I care.
lol at comparing mizzou from 2 years ago to this team now. Its not even rough ridin' close
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: Nick Florences Beard on September 04, 2016, 12:15:15 PM
OSU is going to beat the piss out of OU. Urban is going to go in dry. Lets hope texas has a good showing today or we definitely wont have a team get in the playoff

ND is going to destroy them. I will watch and enjoy it.

OU and UT are the only Big 12 teams capable of getting into the playoff with one loss. No Big 12 team can get in with two losses.

 :thumbs:
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: Big Sam on September 04, 2016, 12:19:29 PM
Big 12 and Pac 12 teams have to prove more than Big 10 or SEC to get into the playoff. That's just the reality. I don't see any Big 12 team that can do that this year, but I guess we'll see.

Most true.  Mix in that UH has an iffy schedule with only Louisville in Houston in November, and they have a shot of taking a playoff spot, the odds get longer for the Big 12.  Could the conference still get someone in?  Sure.  But yesterday did not help.
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: bucket on September 04, 2016, 01:00:16 PM
I'm not going to meltdown over a TCU W and OU losing to a legit Houston team. Mizzou is 2 years removed from winning the SEC EAST, so sorry for saying meh to all the other bullshit. WVU handled them and it was nice to see. I honestly give two fucks less if we're in the playoff or not. Stoops can get mumped for all I care.
lol at comparing mizzou from 2 years ago to this team now. Its not even rough ridin' close

They are once again the best team in their division  :dunno:

That's not really saying much though
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: kslim on September 04, 2016, 01:06:38 PM
I'm not going to meltdown over a TCU W and OU losing to a legit Houston team. Mizzou is 2 years removed from winning the SEC EAST, so sorry for saying meh to all the other bullshit. WVU handled them and it was nice to see. I honestly give two fucks less if we're in the playoff or not. Stoops can get mumped for all I care.
lol at comparing mizzou from 2 years ago to this team now. Its not even rough ridin' close

They are once again the best team in their division  :dunno:

That's not really saying much though
you think mizzo is better than georgia? is our fanbase really this rough ridin' stupid?
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: wetwillie on September 04, 2016, 01:17:01 PM
I'm not going to meltdown over a TCU W and OU losing to a legit Houston team. Mizzou is 2 years removed from winning the SEC EAST, so sorry for saying meh to all the other bullshit. WVU handled them and it was nice to see. I honestly give two fucks less if we're in the playoff or not. Stoops can get mumped for all I care.
lol at comparing mizzou from 2 years ago to this team now. Its not even rough ridin' close

They are once again the best team in their division  :dunno:

That's not really saying much though
you think mizzo is better than georgia? is our fanbase really this rough ridin' stupid?

Mizzou isn't even the 3rd best team in the East, he is just talking out of his ass.
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: 420seriouscat69 on September 04, 2016, 01:24:00 PM
Good grief. It's a win over an SEC team. Will take.
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: MakeItRain on September 04, 2016, 02:55:12 PM
Wacky, good grief. Have some objectivity. WVU beating a terrible team from the SEC East and a few blowout wins against terrible FCS schools is not good by any measure. Oklahoma needed to win  that game and TCU needed to handle SDSU because they are the top two teams and have the best shot at the playoff. Like it or not a conference is judged by its best teams and our best teams didn't show anything this week. If Texas wins tonight we can reevaluate, but as it stands right now the conference looks like dog crap.

Oklahoma didn't need to do jack crap, if they win out they will be Big 12 champs and be in the playoff. And no one gives a damn if TCU beat a top 10 FCS team by 18 on opening night. Just like no one cared when TCU beat KU by 5 or whatever the hell it was.
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: Nick Florences Beard on September 04, 2016, 03:43:26 PM
I'm not going to meltdown over a TCU W and OU losing to a legit Houston team. Mizzou is 2 years removed from winning the SEC EAST, so sorry for saying meh to all the other bullshit. WVU handled them and it was nice to see. I honestly give two fucks less if we're in the playoff or not. Stoops can get mumped for all I care.
lol at comparing mizzou from 2 years ago to this team now. Its not even rough ridin' close

They are once again the best team in their division  :dunno:

That's not really saying much though
you think mizzo is better than georgia? is our fanbase really this rough ridin' stupid?

I sure hope not. Missouri is garbage. Their offense is going to be scraping the bottom of the barrel again (126 out of 128 teams last year in offensive scoring). Drew Lock may not even be a 50% passer.  :sdeek: WVU kicked their ass like they should have, a loss would have been a disaster.
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: Nick Florences Beard on September 04, 2016, 03:44:16 PM
Good grief. It's a win over an SEC team. Will take.

SEC-ish
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: MixBerryCrunch on September 04, 2016, 03:45:01 PM
Wacky, good grief. Have some objectivity. WVU beating a terrible team from the SEC East and a few blowout wins against terrible FCS schools is not good by any measure. Oklahoma needed to win  that game and TCU needed to handle SDSU because they are the top two teams and have the best shot at the playoff. Like it or not a conference is judged by its best teams and our best teams didn't show anything this week. If Texas wins tonight we can reevaluate, but as it stands right now the conference looks like dog crap.

Oklahoma didn't need to do jack crap, if they win out they will be Big 12 champs and be in the playoff. And no one gives a damn if TCU beat a top 10 FCS team by 18 on opening night. Just like no one cared when TCU beat KU by 5 or whatever the hell it was.

Keep telling yourself that. I'm sure that will make it true.
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: bucket on September 04, 2016, 04:30:15 PM
I'm not going to meltdown over a TCU W and OU losing to a legit Houston team. Mizzou is 2 years removed from winning the SEC EAST, so sorry for saying meh to all the other bullshit. WVU handled them and it was nice to see. I honestly give two fucks less if we're in the playoff or not. Stoops can get mumped for all I care.
lol at comparing mizzou from 2 years ago to this team now. Its not even rough ridin' close

They are once again the best team in their division  :dunno:

That's not really saying much though
you think mizzo is better than georgia? is our fanbase really this rough ridin' stupid?

Mizzou isn't even the 3rd best team in the East, he is just talking out of his ass.

Ya
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: wetwillie on September 04, 2016, 06:53:17 PM
Watching the horns in this super uptempo Baylor style offense is weird AF
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: ben ji on September 04, 2016, 06:57:54 PM
Watching the horns in this super uptempo Baylor style offense is weird AF

I agree, but they looked dam good on that first drive.
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: wetwillie on September 04, 2016, 07:03:20 PM
Are there any non good smelling ugly people in austin? Every time they pan the crowd it looks like an Abercrombie catalog.
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: MixBerryCrunch on September 04, 2016, 07:06:23 PM
Watching the horns in this super uptempo Baylor style offense is weird AF

I agree, but they looked dam good on that first drive.

It's been like six years since they've had a decent QB.
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: Nick Florences Beard on September 04, 2016, 07:47:57 PM
OSU is going to beat the piss out of OU. Urban is going to go in dry. Lets hope texas has a good showing today or we definitely wont have a team get in the playoff

ND is going to destroy them. I will watch and enjoy it.

Just look at this dumbass.  :blush:

Texas FR QB looks pretty good so far.
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: MakeItRain on September 04, 2016, 07:57:30 PM
I've never heard DKR this loud on television.
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: star seed 7 on September 04, 2016, 08:04:34 PM
 :love:
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: chum1 on September 04, 2016, 08:05:46 PM
Texas will save the Big 12 this year!
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: wetwillie on September 04, 2016, 08:12:22 PM
Remember when everyone made fun of them for begging a pair of Tulsa assistants to save their offense?
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: IPA4Me on September 04, 2016, 09:48:39 PM
Fun game. Sure is quiet in Austin now.
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: Big Sam on September 04, 2016, 09:50:54 PM
Fun game. Sure is quiet in Austin now.

Yep.  I think the first 3 quarters exhausted the UT crowd.  Probably made more noise than they have in the past 10 years combined in those quarters.  Probably several olds died as a result.
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: Super PurpleCat on September 04, 2016, 09:59:09 PM
Don't let us down, Texas.   :blindfold:
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: IPA4Me on September 04, 2016, 10:09:10 PM
Oh crap
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: ednksu on September 04, 2016, 10:11:48 PM
LOL amazing turn of events!
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: michigancat on September 04, 2016, 10:12:09 PM
Holy crap
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: The Big Train on September 04, 2016, 10:15:20 PM
Good thing I don't have work tomorrow, this game is crazy
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: spacedog on September 04, 2016, 10:15:40 PM
What a game! :excited:
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: wetwillie on September 04, 2016, 10:16:31 PM
Does ND have the balls to fake a punt here?
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: Dugout DickStone on September 04, 2016, 10:19:46 PM
imploding
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: The Big Train on September 04, 2016, 10:21:29 PM
Overtime :excited:




BUT MAYBE NOT :surprised:
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: star seed 7 on September 04, 2016, 10:26:33 PM
Hook'em horns
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: The Big Train on September 04, 2016, 10:35:14 PM
Huge defensive stop there. The fighting horns have a chance to send brain Kelly to purgatory!
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: star seed 7 on September 04, 2016, 10:38:50 PM
(https://www.washingtonpost.com/graphics/sports/ncaa-march-madness-emoji/img/mascots/texasLonghorns.png)
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: star seed 7 on September 04, 2016, 10:42:19 PM
(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fcdn.shaggytexas.com%2Fboard%2Fimages%2Fsmilies%2Fhookem.gif&hash=e622f152d132c27f3b4b31a1d2ef074d65f8db5c)
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: Skipper44 on September 04, 2016, 10:43:59 PM
 :Hook'em: :Hook'em: :Hook'em: :Hook'em: :Hook'em:
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: bshea85 on September 04, 2016, 10:45:03 PM
Here's to hoping the Horns return to dominance in the BigXII.  Stoops ain't doing it with Oklahoma and I'm sick of seeing TCU and Baylor running around like they're top dog.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: mocat on September 04, 2016, 10:48:06 PM
Great win for coach strong
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: The Big Train on September 04, 2016, 10:48:28 PM
:lol:

https://twitter.com/joshparcell/status/772640408933240835
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: wetwillie on September 04, 2016, 10:48:42 PM
Charlie strong actually made Texas great again
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: MakeItRain on September 04, 2016, 10:49:56 PM
OMG #7 TEAM IN THE BIG 12 JUST BEAT NOTRE DAME! THE BIG 12 IS THE BEST WE'RE GOING TO GET THREE TEAMS IN THE PLAYOFF!!! OMG OMG OMG OMG
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: IPA4Me on September 04, 2016, 10:56:16 PM
That was a fun game. I really like Strong. Glad he got that win.
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: star seed 7 on September 04, 2016, 10:57:04 PM
I might buy some Texas gear
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: 420seriouscat69 on September 04, 2016, 11:01:42 PM
OMG! THIS CONFERENCE IS SO mumped! :lol:
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: Super PurpleCat on September 04, 2016, 11:17:13 PM
I don't know why that win felt so good but it did and there it is.
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: mocat on September 04, 2016, 11:19:08 PM
Has notre dame ever won a big game in their entire history?
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: 420seriouscat69 on September 04, 2016, 11:20:34 PM
They killed Texas last year. That's 1.
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: star seed 7 on September 04, 2016, 11:34:39 PM
Has notre dame ever won a big game in their entire history?

Maybe in the 40's
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: MadCat on September 04, 2016, 11:40:21 PM
 Fun game
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: bones129 on September 05, 2016, 01:17:57 AM
Texas will find a way to tube this season.
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: MakeItRain on September 05, 2016, 01:24:03 AM
I enjoyed watching that and I really like Chuck and UT but all of the people acting like they're going to be a factor and they're back need to pump the breaks. They did beat OU last year, then beat their daddies yet only ended up winning 3 more games.
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: 420seriouscat69 on September 05, 2016, 01:38:09 AM
They're definitely not back, yet!
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: 420seriouscat69 on September 05, 2016, 01:42:21 AM
80of this conference is still in the cfb playoff picture. Writing off KU, because #science.
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: Tobias on September 05, 2016, 07:10:32 AM
shaggy is gonna be unreadable until january again :frown:
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: kslim on September 05, 2016, 07:33:29 AM
I enjoyed watching that and I really like Chuck and UT but all of the people acting like they're going to be a factor and they're back need to pump the breaks. They did beat OU last year, then beat their daddies yet only ended up winning 3 more games.
looks to be wide open this year, texas will be a player if they can play some decent defense. That frosh qb looked nice
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: MadCat on September 05, 2016, 12:47:41 PM
I predict sketti brains for TX frosh qb in the not too distant future.
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: MakeItRain on September 05, 2016, 12:50:49 PM
It was weird when they were using him for short yardage plays instead of the 18 wheeler package.
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: pissclams on September 05, 2016, 09:57:31 PM
this seminole - rebel game is an entertaining match up
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: Super PurpleCat on September 05, 2016, 10:21:29 PM
This FSU game seems like it's been on for 5 hours. 
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: Katpappy on September 08, 2016, 07:55:38 PM
Anyone know if there are any games on tonight?
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: pissclams on September 08, 2016, 08:14:41 PM
Anyone know if there are any games on tonight?
not tonight iirc
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: IPA4Me on September 08, 2016, 08:16:23 PM
Pro tonight. Two games on Friday.
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: MakeItRain on September 08, 2016, 08:19:49 PM
Stupid NFL
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: Katpappy on September 08, 2016, 08:42:58 PM
Thx guys.  I'm not into NFL either.
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: Big Sam on September 09, 2016, 07:25:20 PM
So, Louisville runs 5 plays, scores 3 TDs and is up 21-0 on the 'Cuse.  10:17 left in the first.  Gonna be a long Friday night for the Orange.
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: The Big Train on September 09, 2016, 07:28:07 PM
Man their duel threat RB is a stud
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: MixBerryCrunch on September 09, 2016, 08:32:01 PM
The Houston and Louisville game should be really fun.
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) on September 10, 2016, 12:07:04 PM
Mason Randolf kind of sucks, and so does osu
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: pissclams on September 10, 2016, 01:14:26 PM
order is being restored in Lincoln right now
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: wetwillie on September 10, 2016, 01:16:23 PM
If you want to see two teams set college football back 100 years flip over to UMass vs BC
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: The Big Train on September 10, 2016, 01:23:00 PM
O State is in trouble
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: Kat Kid on September 10, 2016, 02:02:27 PM
Chippewa Nation STAND UP!
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: The Big Train on September 10, 2016, 02:12:44 PM
:Wha:
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: cfbandyman on September 10, 2016, 02:13:42 PM
OSU-Central Michgan close
Georgia-Nicholls close
Clemson-Troy close
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: The Big Train on September 10, 2016, 02:13:52 PM
:horrorsurprise:
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: cfbandyman on September 10, 2016, 02:14:20 PM
:Wha:

 :runaway:
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: 420seriouscat69 on September 10, 2016, 02:41:16 PM
Omg!!! Central Michigan!
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: Tobias on September 10, 2016, 02:41:54 PM
FSD, what shall we drink to celebrate #osutears?
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: MixBerryCrunch on September 10, 2016, 02:44:11 PM
crap that was crazy
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: star seed 7 on September 10, 2016, 02:44:43 PM
time to get lit #fuckosu
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: HELLHAMMER on September 10, 2016, 02:45:19 PM
Mike Gundy deserves to rot in hell.
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: MixBerryCrunch on September 10, 2016, 02:47:01 PM
Odds that game is shown as a win in next year's OSU football guide?
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: kso_FAN on September 10, 2016, 02:47:11 PM
Unbelievable ending there. Poor OSU.
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: Kat Kid on September 10, 2016, 02:47:31 PM
that was amazing.

I still think the Auburn FG return was crazier event to watch live but that was very crazy.
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: catastrophe on September 10, 2016, 03:03:22 PM
Amazing finish to that one. Not sure the embarrassment to the Big 12 was worth the excitement of the game, tho.
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: steve dave on September 10, 2016, 03:04:55 PM
wait, should they not have gotten that down? like the rules say they shouldn't have?
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: star seed 7 on September 10, 2016, 03:06:18 PM
the cdubya's are tied with youngstown state at half smdh
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: star seed 7 on September 10, 2016, 03:09:16 PM
the cdubya's are tied with youngstown state at half smdh

pelini is at ysu, is mangino still there?  i don't remember
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: Dugout DickStone on September 10, 2016, 03:09:42 PM
wait, should they not have gotten that down? like the rules say they shouldn't have?

that is what loser OSU fans saying
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: cfbandyman on September 10, 2016, 03:11:24 PM
This conference sucks ass this year
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: kso_FAN on September 10, 2016, 03:16:21 PM
wait, should they not have gotten that down? like the rules say they shouldn't have?

https://twitter.com/mikepereira/status/774696457353895936
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: Trim on September 10, 2016, 03:20:15 PM
Is that "and" supposed to say "in?"
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: Kat Kid on September 10, 2016, 03:28:34 PM
I wish Baylor and Ohio St. would score a bunch of points and win already.
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: BackPayne on September 10, 2016, 03:55:53 PM
crap, Baylor!
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: michigancat on September 10, 2016, 04:15:25 PM
Buncha garbage games today
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: MixBerryCrunch on September 10, 2016, 04:21:57 PM
wait, should they not have gotten that down? like the rules say they shouldn't have?

https://twitter.com/mikepereira/status/774696457353895936

Based on the context the enforcing of that rule would be awful though. If the penalty comes on a fourth down and the result would be a change of possession, then the game should be extended for one play. You shouldn't be able to end the game on offense with a penalty.
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: kso_FAN on September 10, 2016, 04:24:09 PM
wait, should they not have gotten that down? like the rules say they shouldn't have?

https://twitter.com/mikepereira/status/774696457353895936

Based on the context the enforcing of that rule would be awful though. If the penalty comes on a fourth down and the result would be a change of possession, then the game should be extended for one play. You shouldn't be able to end the game on offense with a penalty.

Yes, it was a very odd situation and I wondered about that too.
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: wetwillie on September 10, 2016, 04:25:07 PM
Buncha garbage games today

SD State vs Cal I think will be good tonight
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: cfbandyman on September 10, 2016, 04:46:26 PM
Guys, Baylor is tied 6-6, TCU will probably be rolled by Arky. Just BID
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: jmlynch1 on September 10, 2016, 04:57:53 PM
wait, should they not have gotten that down? like the rules say they shouldn't have?

https://twitter.com/mikepereira/status/774696457353895936

Based on the context the enforcing of that rule would be awful though. If the penalty comes on a fourth down and the result would be a change of possession, then the game should be extended for one play. You shouldn't be able to end the game on offense with a penalty.

Yes, it was a very odd situation and I wondered about that too.
Not saying that the extra down should've been allowed, but the original intent of that rule must have meant if you actually lose a down right? Otherwise that is a really weird gift to the team making the penalty.
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: Big Sam on September 10, 2016, 05:07:54 PM
I think there about 30 people at the Duke game.  I know it is a hoops school and all, but still.
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: MixBerryCrunch on September 10, 2016, 05:41:01 PM
wait, should they not have gotten that down? like the rules say they shouldn't have?

https://twitter.com/mikepereira/status/774696457353895936

Based on the context the enforcing of that rule would be awful though. If the penalty comes on a fourth down and the result would be a change of possession, then the game should be extended for one play. You shouldn't be able to end the game on offense with a penalty.

Yes, it was a very odd situation and I wondered about that too.
Not saying that the extra down should've been allowed, but the original intent of that rule must have meant if you actually lose a down right? Otherwise that is a really weird gift to the team making the penalty.

It would have to be. I don't think they considered the possibility of the penalty resulting in a change of possession like what we saw. The rule needs to be modified to allow for that.
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: MakeItRain on September 10, 2016, 06:01:40 PM
Miami looks like crap against FAU right now.
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: Dugout DickStone on September 10, 2016, 06:23:41 PM
K Trill doesnt look all that good
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: Kat Kid on September 10, 2016, 06:59:49 PM
Why can I not watch Iowa-Iowa State?
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: wetwillie on September 10, 2016, 07:05:04 PM
Football at Bristol Motor Speedway!  Wow what a thing to do.
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: Trim on September 10, 2016, 07:06:26 PM
Why can I not watch Iowa-Iowa State?

Rock bottom.
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: MakeItRain on September 10, 2016, 07:25:40 PM
Why can I not watch Iowa-Iowa State?

You don't have BTN?
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: wetwillie on September 10, 2016, 07:31:59 PM
Fuentes offense at VT is p good. 
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: Kat Kid on September 10, 2016, 07:51:21 PM
Why can I not watch Iowa-Iowa State?

You don't have BTN?

It is showing Illinois.
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: Kat Kid on September 10, 2016, 07:52:48 PM
Why can I not watch Iowa-Iowa State?

You don't have BTN?

It is showing Illinois.

actually both BTN and BTN Extra are showing UNC/Illinois.  It is mind boggling.
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: star seed 7 on September 10, 2016, 07:54:39 PM
VT has horrible uniforms
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: CHONGS on September 10, 2016, 08:12:22 PM
Why can I not watch Iowa-Iowa State?

You don't have BTN?

It is showing Illinois.

actually both BTN and BTN Extra are showing UNC/Illinois.  It is mind boggling.
It's am important  game.
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: MakeItRain on September 10, 2016, 08:19:49 PM
Why can I not watch Iowa-Iowa State?

You don't have BTN?

It is showing Illinois.

actually both BTN and BTN Extra are showing UNC/Illinois.  It is mind boggling.

Its on BTN alternate, it should probably just be on cable access, Iowa State is real bad.
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: Panjandrum on September 10, 2016, 08:29:24 PM
K Trill doesnt look all that good

It's not really clicking for him in Ft. Worth right now.

His accuracy has been crap these past two games.
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: Panjandrum on September 10, 2016, 08:31:16 PM
Fuentes offense at VT is p good.

Fuente is a hell of a coach.  He's deserving of a better job than VT, but he'll do well there for 3-4 years and take a pretty elite gig after that.
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: MakeItRain on September 10, 2016, 08:32:34 PM
Just coming on to mention how shitty Kenny Hill is at throwing the ball, Sisco is absolutely better.
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: 420seriouscat69 on September 10, 2016, 08:39:14 PM
How did A&M let another HS QB get away? :curse: :lol:
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: Super PurpleCat on September 10, 2016, 08:44:58 PM
TCU  :flush:
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: Panjandrum on September 10, 2016, 08:47:50 PM
Yeah, I'm marking down @Baylor and @TCU as "KSU favored" at this point.
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: CHONGS on September 10, 2016, 08:52:13 PM
Yeah, I'm marking down @Baylor and @TCU as "KSU favored" at this point.
You can't be serious.
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: Kat Kid on September 10, 2016, 08:57:56 PM
Yeah, I'm marking down @Baylor and @TCU as "KSU favored" at this point.

 :lol:
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: Panjandrum on September 10, 2016, 08:59:29 PM
Maybe not Baylor. 

TCU is not good. 
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: FranklyFrankYou on September 10, 2016, 09:02:00 PM
K Trill doesnt look all that good

It's not really clicking for him in Ft. Worth right now.

His accuracy has been crap these past two games.
His accuracy is and has been very suspect since the "Kenny Trill" days
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: michigancat on September 10, 2016, 09:02:06 PM
amazing how often Arkansas can successfully play action bootleg to the tight end
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: catastrophe on September 10, 2016, 09:07:47 PM
That QB became dog crap as soon as he insisted on being called "Kenny Trill."
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: MakeItRain on September 10, 2016, 09:20:43 PM
BYU just got called for an awful targeting call. They are getting cheated.
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: MakeItRain on September 10, 2016, 09:23:12 PM
Damn, back to back questionable targeting ejections for BYU.
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: Prince McJunkins on September 10, 2016, 09:24:28 PM
Iowa State is trash. I'm sure it'll still be a dogfight for us in Ames.
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: MakeItRain on September 10, 2016, 09:25:49 PM
I wish we had Doug Mecham as an offensive coordinator
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: troubledscribe on September 10, 2016, 09:27:19 PM
Kenny Trillville Hill is good at football.
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: MixBerryCrunch on September 10, 2016, 09:31:35 PM
Kenny Hill is about as likable as Art Briles.
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: MakeItRain on September 10, 2016, 09:33:44 PM
Kenny Trillville Hill is good at football.

lolwut, no. He blows.
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: MakeItRain on September 10, 2016, 09:35:18 PM
pig aggie :Wha:
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: Prince McJunkins on September 10, 2016, 09:36:31 PM
Yeah. Turpin is fast.
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: MixBerryCrunch on September 10, 2016, 09:43:48 PM
Crazy last five minutes.
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: MakeItRain on September 10, 2016, 09:46:09 PM
How is Gary sweatier than Bert?
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: MixBerryCrunch on September 10, 2016, 09:46:12 PM
The guy who blocked that fieldgoal attempt looks like he's in his forties.
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: troubledscribe on September 10, 2016, 09:47:51 PM
The guy who blocked that fieldgoal attempt looks like he's in his forties.

46 minimum
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: everyone shut up on September 10, 2016, 09:53:41 PM
remember 4OT vs A&M? so fun
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: catastrophe on September 10, 2016, 09:54:27 PM
I am enjoying this game.
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: Panjandrum on September 10, 2016, 09:55:29 PM
How is Gary sweatier than Bert?

Deceptively unfit.
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: catastrophe on September 10, 2016, 09:55:50 PM
remember 4OT vs A&M? so fun

If I could only watch one season of Cats football on repeat it would be that 2011 season (minus the bowl game). So many gems.
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: Panjandrum on September 10, 2016, 09:56:14 PM
Kenny Trillville Hill is good at football.

He's really not.
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: MixBerryCrunch on September 10, 2016, 09:57:31 PM
Kenny Hill has one of the most punchable faces I've ever seen.
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: everyone shut up on September 10, 2016, 10:01:58 PM
Bert Bulimia!
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: MakeItRain on September 10, 2016, 10:02:45 PM
TCU is Charmin soft, like a baby's ass
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: MixBerryCrunch on September 10, 2016, 10:04:17 PM
If not for the Texas win this may be the worst out of conference season for the Big 12 in years. Not good.
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: catastrophe on September 10, 2016, 10:06:46 PM
Big 12 looks super squishy this year. Title is definitely up for grabs.
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: MixBerryCrunch on September 10, 2016, 10:13:08 PM
Big 12 looks super squishy this year. Title is definitely up for grabs.

I've still got Oklahoma running away with it. They may be fringe top ten, but Texas is the only other team in the conference that is top twenty five. There will be a huge log jam at spots  3-8. Could be pretty fun
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: Kat Kid on September 10, 2016, 10:14:10 PM
big 12 power rankings based on what I've seen

1. ut
2. ou
3. tech
4. tcu/baylor
6. k-state/wvu
8. osu
9. isu/ku
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: everyone shut up on September 10, 2016, 10:17:33 PM
is R. Gosling still coaching TT?
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: catastrophe on September 10, 2016, 10:19:52 PM
At best Tech is tied with TCU/Baylor. I'd give it a couple more weeks, but at this point I think you could say: Tech/TCU/Baylor/KSU/WVU as tied for third with UT/OU tied for first.
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: ELL3 on September 10, 2016, 10:45:00 PM
OU, UT, TCU, WVU, BU, KSU, TT, OSU, KU, ISU
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: MakeItRain on September 10, 2016, 10:59:00 PM
Not really certain why he gets a pass for it but the things Butch Jones did were 100x worse than what Art Briles did. I know the media in Big 12 country holds Baylor accountable more than the SEC does Tennessee, but I'm tempted to point to the old ESPN/SEC partnership as a factor as well. :jeffy:
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: wetwillie on September 10, 2016, 11:00:45 PM
His haircut alone should have him banned for life
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: everyone shut up on September 10, 2016, 11:04:03 PM
Gundy's mullet is gross
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: MakeItRain on September 10, 2016, 11:09:47 PM
big 12 power rankings based on what I've seen

1. ut
2. ou
3. tech
4. tcu/baylor
6. k-state/wvu
8. osu
9. isu/ku

Are you aware tech just gave up 37 first half points? They only scored 44 against Northern Arizona last week.
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: Kat Kid on September 10, 2016, 11:15:32 PM
big 12 power rankings based on what I've seen

1. ut
2. ou
3. tech
4. tcu/baylor
6. k-state/wvu
8. osu
9. isu/ku

Are you aware tech just gave up 37 first half points? They only scored 44 against Northern Arizona last week.

I know.  I probably overrate them because they have the best QB in a league with what looks like a bunch of scrubs at QB.
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: MakeItRain on September 10, 2016, 11:25:46 PM
big 12 power rankings based on what I've seen

1. ut
2. ou
3. tech
4. tcu/baylor
6. k-state/wvu
8. osu
9. isu/ku

Are you aware tech just gave up 37 first half points? They only scored 44 against Northern Arizona last week.

I know.  I probably overrate them because they have the best QB in a league with what looks like a bunch of scrubs at QB.

Mahomes is good, does it matter at tech?
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: Panjandrum on September 10, 2016, 11:30:24 PM
I'll bite.

OU
Texas
BU/KSU
WVU/Tech
TCU/OSU
ISU
KU

KSU's defense is going to carry the season.  They seem to be the only Big 12 team that has something that resembles one outside of OU.  If the offense can cobble together something relatively consistent, they'll be more than fine. 

I think people are giving OU too much crap over Houston.  Houston is that good.  Most likely an outside shot at the playoff when/if they run the table.
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: MakeItRain on September 10, 2016, 11:35:56 PM
Arizona is losing to Grambling 21-3 at the half, that would, without a doubt, be the worst loss of the college football season.
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: Panjandrum on September 10, 2016, 11:44:54 PM
This Tech/ASU game is the most boring high scoring game I've seen in a while.
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: MakeItRain on September 10, 2016, 11:48:03 PM
This Tech/ASU game is the most boring high scoring game I've seen in a while.

I feel like all of these spread, no defense games are exactly like this, it sucks.
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: Panjandrum on September 10, 2016, 11:50:18 PM
This Tech/ASU game is the most boring high scoring game I've seen in a while.

I feel like all of these spread, no defense games are exactly like this, it sucks.

It's jumped the shark.  We're probably 3-5 years away from seeing "revolutionary" power run football again.

Christ, it's why two decently coached triple option teams (GT, Navy) have had consistent success when they really have no reason to have it.
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: MakeItRain on September 10, 2016, 11:56:22 PM
Tech :lol:
ASU has 6 yes 6 touchdowns out of the wildcat
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: MakeItRain on September 11, 2016, 12:16:10 AM
This guy from ASU now has 7 touchdowns out of the wildcat. Tech blows.
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: Panjandrum on September 11, 2016, 12:26:52 AM
ASU may get to 80.
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: Katpappy on September 11, 2016, 12:49:39 AM
The Pirate's crew has their swords drawn and ready to overtake BSU's ship.
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: troubledscribe on September 11, 2016, 09:15:51 AM
Kenny Trillville Hill is good at football.

He's really not.

I'll take Kenny Hill and you can have every QB on Kstate's active roster.
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: kso_FAN on September 11, 2016, 09:33:27 AM
At best Tech is tied with TCU/Baylor. I'd give it a couple more weeks, but at this point I think you could say: Tech/TCU/Baylor/KSU/WVU as tied for third with UT/OU tied for first.

This is how it looks right now. UT/OU seem to have the best teams by a significant margin, even if OU looked pretty bad in that loss to Houston. Its arguable that our loss at Stanford is the 2nd best performance by a Big 12 team so far this year. The battle for 3rd should be significant and I could foresee a bunch of teams finishing 5-4/4-5 in a logjam while beating up on each other.
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) on September 11, 2016, 09:43:00 AM
My unbiased analysis:

1. KSU
2. OU
3. UT
4. WVU
5. BU
6. TTU
7. TCU
8. OSU

9000. ISU
404 error-does not compute.  KU
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: michigancat on September 11, 2016, 10:28:14 AM
we're talking trash on Kenny Hill after he had 377 yards passing and 93 yards rushing against a real team?

yeesh, not a good look, boys.

Its arguable that our loss at Stanford is the 2nd best performance by a Big 12 team so far this year.

what on earth
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: MakeItRain on September 11, 2016, 11:09:01 AM
we're talking trash on Kenny Hill after he had 377 yards passing and 93 yards rushing against a real team?

yeesh, not a good look, boys.

Its arguable that our loss at Stanford is the 2nd best performance by a Big 12 team so far this year.

what on earth

Did you see the game; to say he had accuracy issues would be putting it mildly. He has a great receiving crew and offensive coordinators that aren't crippingly risk averse. Even on what should have been the game winning touchdown drive in regulation he has two bad passes before his touchdown run then he commits a stupid penalty that costs his team 15 yards. He is an elusive runner, has an average arm; if he was here our coaches would have let him pass the ball about 18 times and 10 of those would be single pattern pass plays.
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: michigancat on September 11, 2016, 11:19:56 AM
we're talking trash on Kenny Hill after he had 377 yards passing and 93 yards rushing against a real team?

yeesh, not a good look, boys.

Its arguable that our loss at Stanford is the 2nd best performance by a Big 12 team so far this year.

what on earth

Did you see the game; to say he had accuracy issues would be putting it mildly. He has a great receiving crew and offensive coordinators that aren't crippingly risk averse. Even on what should have been the game winning touchdown drive in regulation he has two bad passes before his touchdown run then he commits a stupid penalty that costs his team 15 yards. He is an elusive runner, has an average arm; if he was here our coaches would have let him pass the ball about 18 times and 10 of those would be single pattern pass plays.

I would kill for an elusive runner with an average arm
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: wetwillie on September 11, 2016, 11:26:23 AM
we're talking trash on Kenny Hill after he had 377 yards passing and 93 yards rushing against a real team?

yeesh, not a good look, boys.

Its arguable that our loss at Stanford is the 2nd best performance by a Big 12 team so far this year.

what on earth

Did you see the game; to say he had accuracy issues would be putting it mildly. He has a great receiving crew and offensive coordinators that aren't crippingly risk averse. Even on what should have been the game winning touchdown drive in regulation he has two bad passes before his touchdown run then he commits a stupid penalty that costs his team 15 yards. He is an elusive runner, has an average arm; if he was here our coaches would have let him pass the ball about 18 times and 10 of those would be single pattern pass plays.

I would kill for an elusive runner with an average arm

His name is Alex Delton
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: Panjandrum on September 11, 2016, 12:04:31 PM
We are grading Hill on a curve due to the talent he has supporting him on the field and in the booth.

Boykin wasn't an earth shattering talent, but he was much better than Hill. I agree that someone with Delton's inherent skills would probably do nearly as well in their offense.

Hill is going to put up good numbers, but he's going to struggle to win big. Just like at A&M.
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: MixBerryCrunch on September 11, 2016, 12:18:57 PM
We are grading Hill on a curve due to the talent he has supporting him on the field and in the booth.

Boykin wasn't an earth shattering talent, but he was much better than Hill. I agree that someone with Delton's inherent skills would probably do nearly as well in their offense.

Hill is going to put up good numbers, but he's going to struggle to win big. Just like at A&M.

Kenny Hill is a below average quarterback in a really good offensive system.
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: MakeItRain on September 11, 2016, 12:53:02 PM
we're talking trash on Kenny Hill after he had 377 yards passing and 93 yards rushing against a real team?

yeesh, not a good look, boys.

Its arguable that our loss at Stanford is the 2nd best performance by a Big 12 team so far this year.

what on earth

Did you see the game; to say he had accuracy issues would be putting it mildly. He has a great receiving crew and offensive coordinators that aren't crippingly risk averse. Even on what should have been the game winning touchdown drive in regulation he has two bad passes before his touchdown run then he commits a stupid penalty that costs his team 15 yards. He is an elusive runner, has an average arm; if he was here our coaches would have let him pass the ball about 18 times and 10 of those would be single pattern pass plays.

I would kill for an elusive runner with an average arm

Which of those don't you think Sisco has?
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: michigancat on September 11, 2016, 01:04:52 PM
we're talking trash on Kenny Hill after he had 377 yards passing and 93 yards rushing against a real team?

yeesh, not a good look, boys.

Its arguable that our loss at Stanford is the 2nd best performance by a Big 12 team so far this year.

what on earth

Did you see the game; to say he had accuracy issues would be putting it mildly. He has a great receiving crew and offensive coordinators that aren't crippingly risk averse. Even on what should have been the game winning touchdown drive in regulation he has two bad passes before his touchdown run then he commits a stupid penalty that costs his team 15 yards. He is an elusive runner, has an average arm; if he was here our coaches would have let him pass the ball about 18 times and 10 of those would be single pattern pass plays.

I would kill for an elusive runner with an average arm

Which of those don't you think Sisco has?
both, at least when compared to Kenny Hill
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: MakeItRain on September 11, 2016, 01:07:48 PM
That's stupid
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: michigancat on September 11, 2016, 01:21:17 PM
That's stupid
You're incredibly delusional. I've seen nothing from Ertz that makes me think he can do anything better than Kenny Hill at this point. Yes that's taking into consideration we played Stanford and our coaches suck.
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) on September 11, 2016, 01:26:03 PM
Sisco would have 500+ yards on 55 attempts.
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: MakeItRain on September 11, 2016, 01:42:28 PM
That's stupid
You're incredibly delusional. I've seen nothing from Ertz that makes me think he can do anything better than Kenny Hill at this point. Yes that's taking into consideration we played Stanford and our coaches suck.

And you're incredibly dramatic and reactional. He is historically fast and his athleticism has been talked about from nearly everyone whose only experience watching him wasn't limited to 60 minutes while pak'd. He didn't have a good day throwing the ball but it wasn't to the point where you can say with a straight face that he doesn't have an average arm. You've completely dismissed what he is and can be based off of his first game which was against a national championship contender.
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: MakeItRain on September 11, 2016, 01:44:53 PM
It's also stupid because you're arguing against all of the people who actually watched hill last night and came away unimpressed, you read a stat sheet.
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: MakeItRain on September 11, 2016, 01:50:42 PM
1 touchdown on 55 attempts :ROFL: look out Heisman, here comes Trill.
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: michigancat on September 11, 2016, 01:53:16 PM
It's also stupid because you're arguing against all of the people who actually watched hill last night and came away unimpressed, you read a stat sheet.
I watched over half the game and thought, "hey,  this quarterback can make a play, how nice", long before I read this thread dismissing him as garbage. Didn't think that once about ertz other than the miracle 4th down touchdown.
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: kso_FAN on September 11, 2016, 02:36:35 PM

Its arguable that our loss at Stanford is the 2nd best performance by a Big 12 team so far this year.

what on earth

:D
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: DOD Take 2 on September 11, 2016, 02:53:23 PM
ASU may get to 80.

Went to the game. Always such a weird atmosphere in Sun Devil Stadium. The game was mostly boring except for watching Ballage net 8 TDs and listening to Tech fans be all shocked when they don't score. They definitely all think their offense is the best thing ever. ASU really could've put more on them if Todd Graham wasn't an idiot. Everyone here hates him
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: SkinnyBenny on September 11, 2016, 03:31:24 PM
ASU may get to 80.

Went to the game. Always such a weird atmosphere in Sun Devil Stadium. The game was mostly boring except for watching Ballage net 8 TDs and listening to Tech fans be all shocked when they don't score. They definitely all think their offense is the best thing ever. ASU really could've put more on them if Todd Graham wasn't an idiot. Everyone here hates him

Got any pics of their weird stadium renovations?
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: pissclams on September 11, 2016, 05:17:53 PM
That's stupid
You're incredibly delusional. I've seen nothing from Ertz that makes me think he can do anything better than Kenny Hill at this point. Yes that's taking into consideration we played Stanford and our coaches suck.

And you're incredibly dramatic and reactional. He is historically fast and his athleticism has been talked about from nearly everyone whose only experience watching him wasn't limited to 60 minutes while pak'd. He didn't have a good day throwing the ball but it wasn't to the point where you can say with a straight face that he doesn't have an average arm. You've completely dismissed what he is and can be based off of his first game which was against a national championship contender.
no dog in this fight but come on MiR, calling another poster dramatic?
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: Big Sam on September 11, 2016, 07:58:17 PM
ASU may get to 80.

Went to the game. Always such a weird atmosphere in Sun Devil Stadium. The game was mostly boring except for watching Ballage net 8 TDs and listening to Tech fans be all shocked when they don't score. They definitely all think their offense is the best thing ever. ASU really could've put more on them if Todd Graham wasn't an idiot. Everyone here hates him

Got any pics of their weird stadium renovations?
:excited:
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: DOD Take 2 on September 11, 2016, 10:00:24 PM
ASU may get to 80.

Went to the game. Always such a weird atmosphere in Sun Devil Stadium. The game was mostly boring except for watching Ballage net 8 TDs and listening to Tech fans be all shocked when they don't score. They definitely all think their offense is the best thing ever. ASU really could've put more on them if Todd Graham wasn't an idiot. Everyone here hates him

Got any pics of their weird stadium renovations?
:excited:

I sat on the east side (which hasn't been renovated yet) and didn't walk over and grab pics of new west side. They've got a bunch of barricades up that makes it a pain to go around. I'll go back here this fall again and take photos for ya. West side certainly looks nicer from a distance tho
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: Pete on September 12, 2016, 06:26:46 AM
Awful lot of qhatz football being talked about in this non-qhatz football thread.

I want to talk some non-qhatz, as this thread's framers intended.

OU wins conference, UT finishes tied for second with Baylor.  That's my updated predicto.

Given the poop city USA situation of the Big 12 (worst it's been in the history of the conference???  You can easily make the argument) I agree with _Fan that 4th - 7th is a hot mess.
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: Trim on September 12, 2016, 09:14:28 AM
I didn't see any college football after the osu lol ending, and america was on to nfl by sunday morning.  What are the main things that happened?
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: KCFDcat on September 12, 2016, 09:56:08 AM
I didn't see any college football after the osu lol ending, and america was on to nfl by sunday morning.  What are the main things that happened?
Nothing really. Pretty boring weekend
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: Skipper44 on September 12, 2016, 09:58:01 AM
TCU gagging away one of the precious few P5 wins for the big 12 was one of my key takeaways
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: MakeItRain on September 12, 2016, 10:01:00 AM
Tech let some dude, whose only role is to run the wildcat, score 8 touchdowns.
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: SkinnyBenny on September 12, 2016, 10:10:31 AM
Clemson only beat Troy by 6 and Georgia only beat Nicholls State by 2. Also there was some super boring Ohio State vs. Tulsa game on for some reason. And KU is pure hot garbage.
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: kso_FAN on September 12, 2016, 10:17:43 AM
Awful lot of qhatz football being talked about in this non-qhatz football thread.

I want to talk some non-qhatz, as this thread's framers intended.

OU wins conference, UT finishes tied for second with Baylor.  That's my updated predicto.

Given the poop city USA situation of the Big 12 (worst it's been in the history of the conference???  You can easily make the argument) I agree with _Fan that 4th - 7th is a hot mess.

Could be. 2004 Big 12 was pretty bad. 2 Top 10s (OU, UT) a decent Tech (#18) and a bunch of others. Big 12 North was dreadful.
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: Trim on September 12, 2016, 10:19:58 AM
OK, I will look up the highlights for the tcu, tech and redneck games.
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: MakeItRain on September 12, 2016, 10:28:44 AM
Oh, BYU Utah played the second most entertaining game of the season. BYU's new coach gets pretty turnt during games.
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: kslim on September 12, 2016, 11:37:03 AM
That's stupid
You're incredibly delusional. I've seen nothing from Ertz that makes me think he can do anything better than Kenny Hill at this point. Yes that's taking into consideration we played Stanford and our coaches suck.

And you're incredibly dramatic and reactional. He is historically fast and his athleticism has been talked about from nearly everyone whose only experience watching him wasn't limited to 60 minutes while pak'd. He didn't have a good day throwing the ball but it wasn't to the point where you can say with a straight face that he doesn't have an average arm. You've completely dismissed what he is and can be based off of his first game which was against a national championship contender.
also from iowa
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: steve dave on September 12, 2016, 12:00:57 PM
also he blows out knees like my 3 month old blows out diapers 
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: MadCat on September 12, 2016, 02:43:27 PM
sorry sd  :frown:
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: kso_FAN on September 13, 2016, 10:18:58 AM
I remember when they did this against us back in the day: http://footballscoop.com/news/michigan-didnt-release-depth-chart-vs-colorado-buffs-created/

(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi1.wp.com%2Ffootballscoop.com%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2016%2F09%2FColorado-depth-chart.jpg%3Fw%3D927&hash=d1bc11956b05063dc0f674686b34abe49abcbacb)
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: Skipper44 on September 13, 2016, 10:40:03 AM
damn, Plati has been CU's sid for almost 30 years - at least he has held on to this tradition from their glory years
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: MadCat on September 13, 2016, 11:30:32 AM
Gene Wilder characters (tribute)  :D
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: kso_FAN on September 13, 2016, 12:30:24 PM
damn, Plati has been CU's sid for almost 30 years - at least he has held on to this tradition from their glory years

With us it was actually the injury report. http://a.espncdn.com/ncf/columns/big12/wac/1001/1439853.html
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: kso_FAN on September 13, 2016, 12:41:55 PM
I used to like Leach. Now he just sounds like a whiny old man. Recruit kids that will compete and foster a culture of competitiveness in your program or quit. All of his complaints are completely the responsibility of he and his staff.

https://twitter.com/AaronQ13Fox/status/775512100613476352
Title: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: catastrophe on September 13, 2016, 01:00:04 PM
Man, can you imagine what Leach could do with our hard-nosed five heart recruits? :love:
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: michigancat on September 13, 2016, 01:04:07 PM
I used to like Leach. Now he just sounds like a whiny old man. Recruit kids that will compete and foster a culture of competitiveness in your program or quit. All of his complaints are completely the responsibility of he and his staff.

https://twitter.com/AaronQ13Fox/status/775512100613476352

Reminds me a lot of Huggs
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: kso_FAN on September 13, 2016, 01:13:19 PM
I used to like Leach. Now he just sounds like a whiny old man. Recruit kids that will compete and foster a culture of competitiveness in your program or quit. All of his complaints are completely the responsibility of he and his staff.

https://twitter.com/AaronQ13Fox/status/775512100613476352

Reminds me a lot of Huggs

Well, Huggs without winning much. He's had 2-3 really good seasons in his career.
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) on September 13, 2016, 08:55:05 PM
I like it when coaches speak to their players through the media and bbs'ers take it literally and complain about it.
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: BackPayne on September 15, 2016, 08:15:06 PM
That Houston fumble.  :eek:
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: CHONGS on September 15, 2016, 08:52:45 PM
cmon Tommy T!
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: wetwillie on September 15, 2016, 08:59:05 PM
the cincy defense is v good. 
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: Tobias on September 15, 2016, 09:00:06 PM
which team will get Panj's undying love in the cigars thread tonight?  tune in and find out
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: everyone shut up on September 15, 2016, 09:08:04 PM
I could welcome tuberville back to the big12
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: CHONGS on September 15, 2016, 09:09:37 PM
I could welcome tuberville back to the big12
It both excites and terrifies me.
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: everyone shut up on September 15, 2016, 09:18:05 PM
I could welcome tuberville back to the big12
It both excites and terrifies me.
I'll be less terrified once Venzy is walking our sidelines
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: 420seriouscat69 on September 15, 2016, 09:58:51 PM
Tuberville left the big 12 for a non P5 conference. He's always been a step a head of the big 12 affiliates dorks.

Ppl you should trust in this movement:

1. Tubs
2. OU and Texas
3. Matthew mccaunahey sp****
4. Boren
.
.
87. Wackycat
.
.
100. big 12 leader
.
.
.
1009. Blackcats /captain crap
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: wetwillie on September 15, 2016, 10:00:33 PM
typical tuberville collapse
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: Panjandrum on September 15, 2016, 10:48:01 PM
which team will get Panj's undying love in the cigars thread tonight?  tune in and find out

I like them both.  :D
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: Tobias on September 15, 2016, 10:48:55 PM
that was my favorite part :lol:
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: The Big Train on September 16, 2016, 08:06:55 PM
https://twitter.com/espncfb/status/776948154252009472
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: BackPayne on September 16, 2016, 08:10:23 PM
Did you see the 3 yard rugby punt? Ha!
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: The Big Train on September 16, 2016, 08:20:56 PM
Me?  No I didn't, not watching it just scouring Twitter
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: BackPayne on September 16, 2016, 10:33:00 PM
ESPN reported that Rice's band formed IX at halftime. 
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: Kat Kid on September 16, 2016, 10:36:15 PM
Texas Tech might be terrible.  UTSA is beating ASU after they put up a billion points on Tech.
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: catastrophe on September 17, 2016, 08:33:44 AM
It's really pretty amazing how Tech manages to be so bad at defense every year. I also like UTSA's QB.
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: The Big Train on September 17, 2016, 08:53:49 AM
OU has a really tough non-con this year
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: Gooch on September 17, 2016, 11:44:35 AM
Louisville appears to be really good.
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: BackPayne on September 17, 2016, 01:29:44 PM
How in the hell is Tennessee ranked?!
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: catastrophe on September 17, 2016, 02:10:50 PM
North Dakota State claims another victim.
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: The Big Train on September 17, 2016, 04:13:40 PM
Louisville appears to be really good.

Yeah they shoved it down jimbo's fat rough ridin' face
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: MixBerryCrunch on September 17, 2016, 04:20:41 PM
Alabama losing to Mississippi.
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: Cartierfor3 on September 17, 2016, 06:00:01 PM
Its kinda surprising CBS never upgrades their Saturday afternoon broadcast team. Its pretty bad
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: Panjandrum on September 17, 2016, 06:00:49 PM
North Dakota State claims another victim.

It's disgusting how consistently good they are.
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: wetwillie on September 17, 2016, 06:06:08 PM
Nebraska driving late in the 4th.  I've seen how this movie ends before.
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: michigancat on September 17, 2016, 06:08:12 PM
Its kinda surprising CBS never upgrades their Saturday afternoon broadcast team. Its pretty bad

I think they're fun
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: Cartierfor3 on September 17, 2016, 06:10:12 PM
Verne is fine but Gary Danielson just describes replays
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: michigancat on September 17, 2016, 06:11:12 PM
Verne is fine but Gary Danielson just describes replays

yeah I don't look for much analysis from football analysts
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: Cartierfor3 on September 17, 2016, 06:13:34 PM
I do love football analysis from guys in the stadium relaying to me what Stan just said tho
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: star seed 7 on September 17, 2016, 06:16:24 PM
I do love football analysis from guys in the stadium relaying to me what Stan just said tho

You would love my dad
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: wetwillie on September 17, 2016, 06:19:43 PM
Nebraska driving late in the 4th.  I've seen how this movie ends before.

This movie has a new director,  his name is Mike Riley.
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: Cartierfor3 on September 17, 2016, 06:21:41 PM
HELL YEAH HUSKERS
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: Tobias on September 17, 2016, 06:39:07 PM
hmm i actually get to get pak'd and watch college football tonight :excited:
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: Tobias on September 17, 2016, 06:43:20 PM
this OU delay is really rough ridin' with the nice 6:30/9:30 layout :curse:
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: Tobias on September 17, 2016, 06:46:47 PM
centraltexascat got his 30s of texas state out of me
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: wetwillie on September 17, 2016, 06:47:46 PM
Some tasty late night PAC 12 action tonight
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: Tobias on September 17, 2016, 06:49:18 PM
Some tasty late night PAC 12 action tonight

:eye:
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: Tobias on September 17, 2016, 06:50:05 PM
wish they had a midnight game.  too bad their weather is too awesome for an OU-ish delay
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: star seed 7 on September 17, 2016, 06:50:17 PM
Some tasty late night PAC 12 action tonight

:eye:

 :drool:
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: Tobias on September 17, 2016, 06:51:22 PM
i bought a couple of bottles of wine for this classy PAC12 affair
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: The Big Train on September 17, 2016, 06:51:58 PM
Yeah this delay sucks
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: wetwillie on September 17, 2016, 06:54:54 PM
i bought a couple of bottles of wine for this classy PAC12 affair

A nice cab sauv to pair with USC vs Stanford I hope
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: bucket on September 17, 2016, 06:55:08 PM
i bought a couple of bottles of wine for this classy PAC12 affair

USC gets spanked
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: Tobias on September 17, 2016, 06:55:39 PM
:Wha:
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: wetwillie on September 17, 2016, 07:00:10 PM
Aggie vs War Eagle will have to do in the mean time
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: The Big Train on September 17, 2016, 07:02:51 PM
Go Trees!
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: The Big Train on September 17, 2016, 07:37:42 PM
How do you leave McCaffrey that wide open?
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: Tobias on September 17, 2016, 07:37:58 PM
i don't even know who I'm cheering for
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: Tobias on September 17, 2016, 07:38:18 PM
i think usc tho
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: The Big Train on September 17, 2016, 07:40:05 PM
eff sc, no offense 'bias
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: star seed 7 on September 17, 2016, 07:41:18 PM
i think usc tho

smdh
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: Tobias on September 17, 2016, 07:41:53 PM
right where i wanted you guys :excited:
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: Tobias on September 17, 2016, 07:44:54 PM
my Trojans are ready to roll
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: The Big Train on September 17, 2016, 07:46:41 PM
:sdeek:
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: Tobias on September 17, 2016, 07:47:28 PM
it seems we aren't very good at executing stuff on offense
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: The Big Train on September 17, 2016, 07:52:11 PM
I'm switching over to the OU game
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: wetwillie on September 17, 2016, 08:00:59 PM
BOOMER
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: The Big Train on September 17, 2016, 08:02:12 PM
Let's go Bob!
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: Tobias on September 17, 2016, 08:03:00 PM
BOOMER

for sure
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: Tobias on September 17, 2016, 08:03:51 PM
feel like i can come clean now that OU is on: it was some random 5.99 wine
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: Tobias on September 17, 2016, 08:07:26 PM
urban meyer wtf kind of name is that
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: wetwillie on September 17, 2016, 08:08:14 PM
That's chugging wine, perfect for the OU game.
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: The Big Train on September 17, 2016, 08:08:43 PM
Titos
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: Tobias on September 17, 2016, 08:09:48 PM
That's chugging wine, perfect for the OU game.

i feel better now that it's out
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: The Big Train on September 17, 2016, 08:10:50 PM
Yellow tail?
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: Tobias on September 17, 2016, 08:10:51 PM
Titos

that's for the 9:30 game tbt, wtf
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: Tobias on September 17, 2016, 08:11:11 PM
mondavi
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: Tobias on September 17, 2016, 08:11:38 PM
I'm not a philistine
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: The Big Train on September 17, 2016, 08:11:57 PM
Titos

that's for the 9:30 game tbt, wtf

There's plenty :cheers:
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: Tobias on September 17, 2016, 08:12:46 PM
god damn it bob
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: Gooch on September 17, 2016, 08:13:04 PM
OU kickers
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: Tobias on September 17, 2016, 08:13:40 PM
this game must be difficult for you, gooch
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: Gooch on September 17, 2016, 08:14:25 PM
How's that?
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: star seed 7 on September 17, 2016, 08:15:52 PM
urban meyer wtf kind of name is that

used to coach at utah  :love:
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: wetwillie on September 17, 2016, 08:15:59 PM
Delay canceled out bob's big game abilities
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: Tobias on September 17, 2016, 08:16:02 PM
s wichita vs bucky, i mean...
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: Tobias on September 17, 2016, 08:16:49 PM
Delay canceled out bob's big game abilities

we can only hope
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: Gooch on September 17, 2016, 08:18:37 PM
How'd OU spend all that money to renovate the stadium and still be rocking the high school light poles?
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: The Big Train on September 17, 2016, 08:18:45 PM
Need points here Bob
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: Tobias on September 17, 2016, 08:19:12 PM
How'd OU spend all that money to renovate the stadium and still be rocking the high school light poles?

Well said.
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: star seed 7 on September 17, 2016, 08:19:18 PM
the company i work for got mumped over big time by OU on that renovation  :curse:
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: The Big Train on September 17, 2016, 08:19:29 PM
How'd OU spend all that money to renovate the stadium and still be rocking the high school light poles?

Gotta leave some of the old stuff for nostalgia
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: The Big Train on September 17, 2016, 08:19:49 PM
the company i work for got mumped over big time by OU on that renovation  :curse:

How?
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: Gooch on September 17, 2016, 08:20:42 PM
the company i work for got mumped over big time by OU on that renovation  :curse:
Those dirt burglaring bastards. :curse:
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: star seed 7 on September 17, 2016, 08:21:30 PM
the company i work for got mumped over big time by OU on that renovation  :curse:

How?

by being dishonest
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: Gooch on September 17, 2016, 08:22:27 PM
eff forgot how annoying the OU band is.
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: Tobias on September 17, 2016, 08:24:41 PM
this seems bad
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: ShellShock on September 17, 2016, 08:26:42 PM
the company i work for got mumped over big time by OU on that renovation  :curse:

How?

by being dishonest

What's your involvement with the renovation??
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: Tobias on September 17, 2016, 08:29:20 PM
that white guy for Stanford already has 100 rushing and 65 receiving
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: Tobias on September 17, 2016, 08:31:08 PM
there we go bob
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: Tobias on September 17, 2016, 08:31:19 PM
eff this game for not starting two hours ago
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: Tobias on September 17, 2016, 08:39:09 PM
bob you sly dog
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: wetwillie on September 17, 2016, 08:40:32 PM
This probably means we have to let Texas beat us now :frown:
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: Panjandrum on September 17, 2016, 08:41:42 PM
Well, that helps.  #Boomer
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: Tobias on September 17, 2016, 08:41:56 PM
whatever it takes
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: Gooch on September 17, 2016, 08:41:56 PM
Mixon just hit a crease like he did that girl.
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: wetwillie on September 17, 2016, 08:43:49 PM
Mixon just hit a crease like he did that girl.

Ok_cat would have appreciated this effort, thank you.
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: ednksu on September 17, 2016, 08:44:54 PM
Sandstorm ou?  Really?
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: ednksu on September 17, 2016, 08:46:58 PM
Holy crap how did the refs miss that drop
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: The Big Train on September 17, 2016, 08:50:00 PM
The guy is an idiot so I'm not surprised
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: Gooch on September 17, 2016, 08:50:34 PM
Holy crap how did the refs miss that drop
Have you seen Big XII refs work before?
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: Tobias on September 17, 2016, 08:53:18 PM
is big bro on yet
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: Gooch on September 17, 2016, 08:54:39 PM
OU appears to be very inefficient at stopping the run.
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: Gooch on September 17, 2016, 08:58:37 PM
And the pass.
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: ShellShock on September 17, 2016, 08:58:54 PM
OU appears to be very inefficient at stopping the run.

If they try this 3-man front vs us, we'll run through them with ease...
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: Gooch on September 17, 2016, 09:01:36 PM
Welp I think I'm going to watch The Force Awakens now.
Title: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: Tobias on September 17, 2016, 09:26:49 PM
baker mayfield is an unconfident loser
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: WildcatPower on September 17, 2016, 09:27:00 PM
Oh crap.... OU looks terrible so far.
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: Tobias on September 17, 2016, 09:27:41 PM
hopefully big bro wrecks shop tonight
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: WildcatPower on September 17, 2016, 09:27:49 PM
Oh damn. Kill shot.
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: KCFDcat on September 17, 2016, 09:28:21 PM
I had no idea TCU played ISU today. Hm.
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: KCFDcat on September 17, 2016, 09:28:58 PM
Looks like Ohio states basic defense is pretty rough ridin' good.
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: ednksu on September 17, 2016, 09:44:37 PM
 tOSU with the catch of the year
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: Tobias on September 17, 2016, 09:45:54 PM
https://twitter.com/deadspin/status/777337501757366276
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: Tobias on September 17, 2016, 09:46:52 PM
texas D 404
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: Prince McJunkins on September 17, 2016, 09:48:11 PM
It's going to suck to lose to this garbage OU team.
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: The Big Train on September 17, 2016, 09:48:32 PM
Their season is over
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: Tobias on September 17, 2016, 09:52:37 PM
y'all talking about the 2016 b12 champs?
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: TheHamburglar on September 17, 2016, 09:52:48 PM
Texas-Cal just starting.  This belongs in the I'm getting old thread, but nope, I'm going to bed.
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: Tobias on September 17, 2016, 09:53:22 PM
I've got this one for ya Hambs
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: wetwillie on September 17, 2016, 09:54:08 PM
Late night PACtion is not for the faint of heart
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: sys on September 17, 2016, 09:56:12 PM
i may watch this game.  i should have a decision in 10-15 minutes.
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: Trim on September 17, 2016, 09:57:40 PM
I'm about to make dinner and some of you are going to bed.  So crazy.  - Trim Russell
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: Tobias on September 17, 2016, 09:58:07 PM
with all do respect, I've moved on
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: Tobias on September 17, 2016, 09:58:31 PM
i may watch this game.  i should have a decision in 10-15 minutes.

you should
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: Trim on September 17, 2016, 09:59:09 PM
with all do respect, I've moved on

 :eye:
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: Bloodfart on September 17, 2016, 09:59:44 PM
I'm tsc'ing perty hard fellas.  Hope thieves don't ruin my night.
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: Tobias on September 17, 2016, 10:00:15 PM
they will if you give them that power
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: The Big Train on September 17, 2016, 10:00:28 PM
I'm still awake so I could watch this Texas-Cal game
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: The Big Train on September 17, 2016, 10:01:36 PM
Just opened all the windows and I'll probably need to put on sweats now, it's football season guys :excited:
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: Tobias on September 17, 2016, 10:01:45 PM
it's the #1 game you guys should have circled today
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: sys on September 17, 2016, 10:02:33 PM
i may watch this game.  i should have a decision in 10-15 minutes.

you should

i prolly will, i don't have a lot of willpower.
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: Tobias on September 17, 2016, 10:02:45 PM
Just opened all the windows and I'll probably need to put on sweats now, it's football season guys :excited:

oh wow i just looked at the weather - good pro-tip
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: Bloodfart on September 17, 2016, 10:03:29 PM
they will if you give them that power

The half gallon says we'll be OK.  OK?
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: Tobias on September 17, 2016, 10:03:41 PM
i prolly will, i don't have a lot of willpower.

did you see the part where I'm drinking incredibly cheap wine?
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: Tobias on September 17, 2016, 10:03:55 PM
they will if you give them that power

The half gallon says we'll be OK.  OK?

OK
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: Bloodfart on September 17, 2016, 10:05:53 PM
OK THEN!
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: Tobias on September 17, 2016, 10:06:17 PM
:alleyoop:
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: Bloodfart on September 17, 2016, 10:09:04 PM
LET'S GO!
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: sys on September 17, 2016, 10:10:27 PM
did you see the part where I'm drinking incredibly cheap wine?

it was a good choice.
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: sys on September 17, 2016, 10:12:03 PM
i'm not sure who i'm going to be rooting for in this one.  curious to see how it plays out.
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: Tobias on September 17, 2016, 10:13:39 PM
you have to just pick one and go with it.  i suggest cal
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: sys on September 17, 2016, 10:15:38 PM
my heart is leaning cal, but i don't want to pick them and then immediately see them lose by a lot and it's not a fun game for me all because i made a foolish choice early in the game.
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: wetwillie on September 17, 2016, 10:17:02 PM
Team, state , conference would have you rooting for the golden bears I believe
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: Tobias on September 17, 2016, 10:20:18 PM
you can pick after half, sys
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: Bloodfart on September 17, 2016, 10:21:06 PM
NOPE!
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: IPA4Me on September 17, 2016, 10:21:20 PM
Let's go Charlie.
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: CHONGS on September 17, 2016, 10:22:51 PM
Watching OU get the crap beat out of them never gets old.
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: Tobias on September 17, 2016, 10:23:14 PM
it really doesn't
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: Trim on September 17, 2016, 10:23:20 PM
Cal because Beast Mode.
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: Tobias on September 17, 2016, 10:23:52 PM
and also tsc
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: Trim on September 17, 2016, 10:25:07 PM
https://twitter.com/MoneyLynch/status/776885536354992128
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: Tobias on September 17, 2016, 10:25:27 PM
that watching this Texas D is adorbs
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: star seed 7 on September 17, 2016, 10:26:03 PM
texas-cal is like my #2 against #5
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: Tobias on September 17, 2016, 10:26:09 PM
I'm not even editing that ^^^
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: Tobias on September 17, 2016, 10:26:28 PM
welcome back
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: star seed 7 on September 17, 2016, 10:27:23 PM
wearing a cal hoodie atm but hook'eming
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: Tobias on September 17, 2016, 10:28:46 PM
:Wha:
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: Tobias on September 17, 2016, 10:29:01 PM
he was down
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: WillieWatanabe on September 17, 2016, 10:30:46 PM
I like when Missouri loses.
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: mocat on September 17, 2016, 10:31:33 PM
M I Z L O L
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: wetwillie on September 17, 2016, 10:32:46 PM
these bears are really b(e)aring down
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: Kat Kid on September 17, 2016, 10:33:03 PM
M I Z L O L

That happened so fast there wasn't even room to breathe.
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: ednksu on September 17, 2016, 10:35:00 PM
Fantastic find Tobias.

Lol oops, 2 pages on the refresh, that deadspin tweet on that catch.  Simply amazing.
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: sys on September 17, 2016, 10:36:14 PM
that overturned fumble made the choice for me.  i was going to go texas, maybe even stop watching because it was no longer even competitive, but now i'm firmly cal.  go cal.
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: sys on September 17, 2016, 10:37:30 PM
and i'm gonna have to go find out what happened to missouri.
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: Tobias on September 17, 2016, 10:37:46 PM
this thread has new life
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: The Big Train on September 17, 2016, 10:38:21 PM
tsc is dead
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: mocat on September 17, 2016, 10:38:32 PM
Just opened all the windows and I'll probably need to put on sweats now, it's football season guys :excited:

Just came here also to say it took me am awfully long time to decipher this post since it was tbt i assumed he was talking about computer windows
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: michigancat on September 17, 2016, 10:38:37 PM
I was offered free tix to Cal/Texas and turned them down
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: Tobias on September 17, 2016, 10:38:44 PM
c is dead
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: The Big Train on September 17, 2016, 10:39:27 PM
Just opened all the windows and I'll probably need to put on sweats now, it's football season guys :excited:

Just came here also to say it took me am awfully long time to decipher this post since it was tbt i assumed he was talking about computer windows

:love:
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: Tobias on September 17, 2016, 10:40:01 PM
I was offered free tix to Cal/Texas and turned them down

you made the right choice
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: star seed 7 on September 17, 2016, 10:40:29 PM
I was offered free tix to Cal/Texas and turned them down

smdh
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: The Big Train on September 17, 2016, 10:41:33 PM
Probably went to some no name concert instead, smdh
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: mocat on September 17, 2016, 10:41:35 PM
I was offered free tix to Cal/Texas and turned them down

you made the right choice

Berkeley is a crap hole iirrccc
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: star seed 7 on September 17, 2016, 10:42:55 PM
i saw a homeless man crap on the sidewalk across the street from campus when i was like 10 years old
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: sys on September 17, 2016, 10:43:43 PM
i'm firmly cal.

i already regret this.
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: sys on September 17, 2016, 10:44:31 PM
berkeley is nice, you philistines.
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: Tobias on September 17, 2016, 10:44:55 PM
i think I've mentioned it to you before michi but I went on an "official" to a completely small time school in oakland once and they spent more time walking me around the cal campus
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: Tobias on September 17, 2016, 10:45:07 PM
/wacky
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: michigancat on September 17, 2016, 10:45:24 PM
Probably went to some no name concert instead, smdh

I'm at home message boarding and watching it on TV. I would like to go to a game sometime though
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: michigancat on September 17, 2016, 10:45:41 PM
you should see Cal's hill! :sdeek:
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: Tobias on September 17, 2016, 10:46:08 PM
my opinion also involves me not really caring about football other than tailgating, in which case I'd stay home
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: The Big Train on September 17, 2016, 10:46:24 PM
Probably went to some no name concert instead, smdh

I'm at home message boarding and watching it on TV. I would like to go to a game sometime though

I was jjk bud, no need to get defensive
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: sys on September 17, 2016, 10:46:40 PM
i think I've mentioned it to you before michi but I went on an "official" to a completely small time school in oakland once and they spent more time walking me around the cal campus

what sport?
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: Tobias on September 17, 2016, 10:47:07 PM
soccer
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: michigancat on September 17, 2016, 10:48:49 PM
my opinion also involves me not really caring about football other than tailgating, in which case I'd stay home

fun fact! one of our good friends graduated from Cal and tailgated with us at the stanford game! Get this, it was her first tailgate party ever! :sdeek:
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: Tobias on September 17, 2016, 10:49:28 PM
i bet you guys made it fun :thumbs:
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: wetwillie on September 17, 2016, 10:52:12 PM
its a shame bob couldn't hold it together long enough to let charlie whip his ass in the Red River as a top ten match up. 
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: Trim on September 17, 2016, 10:52:47 PM
OU has it back under 20 and is approaching midfield.  I have to keep an eye on this b/c the delay f'd up the schedule and when the local seahawks show will start.
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: Tobias on September 17, 2016, 10:52:52 PM
CAL!
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: Tobias on September 17, 2016, 10:53:20 PM
#beastmoD
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: The Big Train on September 17, 2016, 10:53:42 PM
Not worried
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: The Big Train on September 17, 2016, 10:55:58 PM
(https://67.media.tumblr.com/e0b504ab3a1cc812d17ed363a167c966/tumblr_n1epjcDaoq1tnlgoco1_250.gif)
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: Tobias on September 17, 2016, 10:57:09 PM
(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fuploads.tapatalk-cdn.com%2F20160918%2F4468f93825a64050137beef81714e3b3.jpg&hash=08a814b87d9d0fdd2c1bbb8c1ea6d67178d7d30f)
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: michigancat on September 17, 2016, 10:58:51 PM
Wow, San Jose State is also playing Utah tonight. What a big night for Bay Area college football.
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: star seed 7 on September 17, 2016, 11:00:34 PM
go utes  :ksu:
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: Tobias on September 17, 2016, 11:01:17 PM
it's my alternate, SJSU doing ok :thumbs:
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: Tobias on September 17, 2016, 11:01:56 PM
go utes  :ksu:

they're my number two :thumbs:
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: star seed 7 on September 17, 2016, 11:02:44 PM
top 10
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: Trim on September 17, 2016, 11:03:10 PM
I was offered free tix to Cal/Texas and turned them down

Get free tix to Cal/UW and I'll come down.  I want the bobblehead.
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: mocat on September 17, 2016, 11:05:48 PM
I am pro texas tonight
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: bucket on September 17, 2016, 11:05:55 PM
Dr. Seuss was EMAW as eff! Thanks, Tobias!
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: michigancat on September 17, 2016, 11:06:55 PM
I was offered free tix to Cal/Texas and turned them down

Get free tix to Cal/UW and I'll come down.  I want the bobblehead.

I'll ask. Might not be able to go though. so many bay area entertainment options, maybe I'll be at a concert or something.
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: star seed 7 on September 17, 2016, 11:07:11 PM
I am pro texas tonight

 :thumbs:
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: Tobias on September 17, 2016, 11:08:59 PM
Dr. Seuss was EMAW as eff! Thanks, Tobias!

whoa, hadn't even noticed the wabash part tbh
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: Trim on September 17, 2016, 11:09:15 PM
I was offered free tix to Cal/Texas and turned them down

Get free tix to Cal/UW and I'll come down.  I want the bobblehead.

I'll ask. Might not be able to go though. so many bay area entertainment options, maybe I'll be at a concert or something.

Fun!
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: The Big Train on September 17, 2016, 11:10:15 PM
:lol:
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: Tobias on September 17, 2016, 11:10:27 PM
trim should liveblog a #rustyshow before an athletic event imo
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: michigancat on September 17, 2016, 11:11:07 PM
Also, @tobias, Mills is lovely. I guess the neighborhood around Cal's campus is nicer though.
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: Tobias on September 17, 2016, 11:13:03 PM
man it feels good to get burned twice :love:
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: Tobias on September 17, 2016, 11:15:31 PM
sys!
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: wetwillie on September 17, 2016, 11:15:47 PM
Texas belongs in the PAC-12, they fit right in.
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: Tobias on September 17, 2016, 11:16:09 PM
speaking of getting burned twice
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: wetwillie on September 17, 2016, 11:16:43 PM
Should lobby Texas legislature to adop west coast time in Texas.
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: Trim on September 17, 2016, 11:19:21 PM
trim should liveblog a #rustyshow before an athletic event imo

Award-winning #coverage.
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: Tobias on September 17, 2016, 11:20:49 PM
man, stanford only won by 17?
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: Tobias on September 17, 2016, 11:22:32 PM
i love texas but hate #nub12.  can i cheer for cal?
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: wetwillie on September 17, 2016, 11:26:31 PM
Wow!
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: star seed 7 on September 17, 2016, 11:26:38 PM
hook'em
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: Tobias on September 17, 2016, 11:27:17 PM
this game is fantastic
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: Tobias on September 17, 2016, 11:27:58 PM
from clintdempseybradunderwoodland
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: wetwillie on September 17, 2016, 11:28:38 PM
'Bias has shaggy let their guard down yet?
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: cfbandyman on September 17, 2016, 11:29:09 PM
OU is pathetic
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: star seed 7 on September 17, 2016, 11:29:30 PM
texas-cal, man
Title: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: Tobias on September 17, 2016, 11:30:27 PM
'Bias has shaggy let their guard down yet?

i ignore all their football posts because they're rough ridin' stupid as crap about football
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: wetwillie on September 17, 2016, 11:30:47 PM
Cal's Jesse Ertz just dropped that in a shoebox
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: Tobias on September 17, 2016, 11:31:53 PM
texas-cal, man

so fun
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: star seed 7 on September 17, 2016, 11:33:59 PM
'Bias has shaggy let their guard down yet?

i ignore all their football posts because they're rough ridin' stupid as crap about football

oh man, probably the worst sewer or a bbs in the world
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: The Big Train on September 17, 2016, 11:37:49 PM
This is gonna be a great second half
Title: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: The Big Train on September 17, 2016, 11:38:51 PM
If I'm gonna finish this game I need food bad guys
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: The Big Train on September 17, 2016, 11:40:14 PM
'chos?
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: star seed 7 on September 17, 2016, 11:40:51 PM
If I'm gonna finish this game I need food bad guys

i was just telling 'bias this
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: Tobias on September 17, 2016, 11:41:42 PM
can confirm, you guys have earned 'chos
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: The Big Train on September 17, 2016, 11:41:58 PM
YES
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: Tobias on September 17, 2016, 11:41:59 PM
This is gonna be a great second half

YES!
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: Panjandrum on September 17, 2016, 11:42:21 PM
If I'm gonna finish this game I need food bad guys

I put on coffee.  But, I may make some of those now that you mention it.
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: star seed 7 on September 17, 2016, 11:43:21 PM
no 'cho ingredients tho
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: Tobias on September 17, 2016, 11:43:29 PM
i think coffee begets actual nachos - don't know the recipe for that, you're on your own
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: star seed 7 on September 17, 2016, 11:44:07 PM
i do have coffee ingreds tho
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: Tobias on September 17, 2016, 11:46:21 PM
my fave thing about shaggy is watching lib get repeatedly banned for stances which would be classified as brownback-leaning here
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: mocat on September 17, 2016, 11:47:22 PM
What is the deal with other message boards and boob gif avis?
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: Tobias on September 17, 2016, 11:48:16 PM
wood
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: star seed 7 on September 17, 2016, 11:48:39 PM
aggie mods  :curse:
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: mocat on September 17, 2016, 11:52:28 PM
To me once you have my avi you're set for your whole bbs'n life
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: The Big Train on September 17, 2016, 11:56:22 PM
Guys I went out for food, will report back
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: Tobias on September 17, 2016, 11:59:22 PM
what kind of ranch
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: star seed 7 on September 18, 2016, 12:00:56 AM
pizza ranch pry  :lol:
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: Tobias on September 18, 2016, 12:04:57 AM
:lol:
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: The Big Train on September 18, 2016, 12:08:37 AM
Nope!  :excited:

(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fuploads.tapatalk-cdn.com%2F20160918%2Fc733f0b5c943f48d10d65b3d20dc4648.jpg&hash=c0ff162cce1480a7d8d94f2d1af42eb395ec587e)
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: The Big Train on September 18, 2016, 12:08:59 AM
#YOLO
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: Tobias on September 18, 2016, 12:11:17 AM
sys, you guys are killing it
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: sys on September 18, 2016, 12:13:08 AM
sys!

it was risky, but emotionally investing in cal has really been a great choice.
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: Tobias on September 18, 2016, 12:15:17 AM
i wouldn't knowingly screw you over
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: wetwillie on September 18, 2016, 12:17:22 AM
Sunshine plays defense for the horns, who knew!
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: Tobias on September 18, 2016, 12:22:51 AM
it's 12:22 and there's over 1/3 a football game left :love:
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: wetwillie on September 18, 2016, 12:25:37 AM
Two QB systems are suboptimal
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: sys on September 18, 2016, 12:28:03 AM
Two QB systems are suboptimal

kstate did that once, i think.  i don't recall how it worked.
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: Tobias on September 18, 2016, 12:28:10 AM
this is not finonomle
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: sys on September 18, 2016, 12:28:47 AM
i don't think i like matte helmets.  not ever.
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: sys on September 18, 2016, 12:29:41 AM
or the misshapen ones.  i like a nice shiny round helmet.
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: catastrophe on September 18, 2016, 12:29:43 AM
OSU had some good matte combos IMHO.
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: The Big Train on September 18, 2016, 12:29:54 AM
I feel energized and refreshed guys!  Let's finish this thing
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: star seed 7 on September 18, 2016, 12:31:21 AM
This field looks like bishop era turf
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: catastrophe on September 18, 2016, 12:33:09 AM
Does field/stadium naming just go to the highest bidder or do they care at all about the actual name? "KABAM" field is the second worst name I've seen next to "YUM! Center"
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: wetwillie on September 18, 2016, 12:34:48 AM
Look up the name of the white sox of chicagos stadium and get
Back to me
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: Tobias on September 18, 2016, 12:36:20 AM
these defenses...
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: sys on September 18, 2016, 12:36:49 AM
it's a miracle cal is in this game with the way texas can run for like 10-15 yards any time they care to.
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: catastrophe on September 18, 2016, 12:38:31 AM
Look up the name of the white sox of chicagos stadium and get
Back to me

Just did, and I'm sticking with my rankings. I'm not even talking about brands, just how stupid the names look on the field.
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: catastrophe on September 18, 2016, 12:39:48 AM
it's a miracle cal is in this game with the way texas can run for like 10-15 yards any time they care to.

Yea, I'm not sure why they don't just have Swoops in there and run 100% of the time.
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: sys on September 18, 2016, 12:45:28 AM
football really is a ridiculous game.  i give it 15 years, max.  maybe not to disappear completely, but to be relegated to the sideline of barbaric sports played by dumbasses and psychopaths.  like boxing and ufc.
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: The Big Train on September 18, 2016, 12:48:10 AM
sys, I know you already contributed, but I think my self consciousness thread you could shine in
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: sys on September 18, 2016, 12:50:47 AM
sys, I know you already contributed, but I think my self consciousness thread you could shine in

i'm not much into that stuff.
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: star seed 7 on September 18, 2016, 12:51:18 AM
Texas  :gocho:
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: The Big Train on September 18, 2016, 12:51:31 AM
Fair enough
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: sys on September 18, 2016, 12:51:40 AM
we're gonna eff around and lose this game.
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: catastrophe on September 18, 2016, 12:53:45 AM
football really is a ridiculous game.  i give it 15 years, max.  maybe not to disappear completely, but to be relegated to the sideline of barbaric sports played by dumbasses and psychopaths.  like boxing and ufc.

For the amount of income it generates now, this would greatly surprise me. I'd give it a much longer horizon.
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: Trim on September 18, 2016, 12:57:20 AM
http://goEMAW.com/forum/index.php?topic=36657.0
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: The Big Train on September 18, 2016, 01:03:19 AM
CAL is at least showing fight
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: sys on September 18, 2016, 01:04:00 AM
well now.
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: star seed 7 on September 18, 2016, 01:05:41 AM
Texas has perfect uniforms
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: sys on September 18, 2016, 01:08:47 AM
For the amount of income it generates now, this would I'd give it a much longer horizon.

i think it will rot from the ground up.  amateur athletes will stop playing it for free, high schools will stop fielding teams when the courts decide they can be liable for sponsoring an activity known to be dangerous.  etc.  you'll still have pros willing and able to destroy their bodies for pay, but it will wither.
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: catastrophe on September 18, 2016, 01:09:54 AM
Texas's all whites are the best uniforms in football.
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: sys on September 18, 2016, 01:12:41 AM
i like the metallic orange cows on their helmets.
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: star seed 7 on September 18, 2016, 01:13:21 AM
Me too sys
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: catastrophe on September 18, 2016, 01:17:17 AM
For the amount of income it generates now, this would I'd give it a much longer horizon.

i think it will rot from the ground up.  amateur athletes will stop playing it for free, high schools will stop fielding teams when the courts decide they can be liable for sponsoring an activity known to be dangerous.  etc.  you'll still have pros willing and able to destroy their bodies for pay, but it will wither.

I agree something like this will eventually happen, but I don't see how it could destroy football within 15 years. A lot of kids that play football currently see it as their only means to an education or even career. If High Schools stopped offering it within the next few years (which I really doubt), some other farm system would spring up to fill the void.
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: star seed 7 on September 18, 2016, 01:18:56 AM
Do millennials even understand how lucky they are to grow up in a pac12 after dark world?
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: sys on September 18, 2016, 01:24:19 AM
this is really good.  i like this.
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: sys on September 18, 2016, 01:25:28 AM
I agree something like this will eventually happen, but I don't see how it could destroy football within 15 years. A lot of kids that play football currently see it as their only means to an education or even career. If High Schools stopped offering it within the next few years (which I really doubt), some other farm system would spring up to fill the void.

yeah, could be longer, i dunno.  things can change fast though, once they get started changing.
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: sys on September 18, 2016, 01:31:18 AM
texas should have run, even with the clock, because they're much better at that than passing.
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: star seed 7 on September 18, 2016, 01:32:37 AM
Appears you are correct sys
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: catastrophe on September 18, 2016, 01:33:14 AM
:lol:
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: sys on September 18, 2016, 01:34:37 AM
we did it!
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: sys on September 18, 2016, 01:35:29 AM
wait, what sort of unamerican bullshit is this.
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: sys on September 18, 2016, 01:37:46 AM
ok, that's fine then.
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: catastrophe on September 18, 2016, 01:38:03 AM
I mean, Texas should have lost, but not like that.
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: sys on September 18, 2016, 01:38:30 AM
good job, refs.  good work.
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: bucket on September 18, 2016, 01:43:50 AM
 :facepalm:
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: WildcatPower on September 18, 2016, 02:34:06 AM
Not a good day for the Big XII.
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: ednksu on September 18, 2016, 07:22:37 AM
What happened with the Texas game refs?
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: The Big Train on September 18, 2016, 08:33:02 AM
:sdeek:
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: wetwillie on September 18, 2016, 08:47:57 AM
i should probably take it to the shame thread but i fell asleep before the 4th quarter of the Cal game
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: The Big Train on September 18, 2016, 08:52:00 AM
I felt energized after eating for like 10 minutes then I fell asleep too
Title: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: catastrophe on September 18, 2016, 10:12:27 AM
At the very end (Texas was behind) Texas punted and tried to hold Cal, who on third and short broke a run all the way to the end zone but did that stupid back handed flip right before he crossed the goal line. Texas guy picked it up in the end zone but the replay refs ruled it was not an immediate recovery so still Cal's ball.

Replay refs also missed a pretty obvious incomplete pass that led to a Cal score earlier, but not that big of a deal.
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: Tobias on September 18, 2016, 10:39:16 AM
i should probably take it to the shame thread but i fell asleep before the 4th quarter of the Cal game

the good part about doing the same thing is that i just got caught up so it's like i never missed anything
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: star seed 7 on September 18, 2016, 10:41:25 AM
I watched it all
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: Trim on September 18, 2016, 10:58:48 AM
I fell asleep, woke up and read through sys' posts here to see we won, but didn't see what all the fuss was about until checking "the other site" (in this case, espn.com) this morning.
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) on September 23, 2016, 07:59:45 PM
Kenny Hill rough ridin' sucks
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: That_Guy on September 23, 2016, 08:21:59 PM
Kenny Hill rough ridin' sucks
So does his receivers


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: That_Guy on September 23, 2016, 08:22:23 PM
I wish we had Utah's QB, Troy Williams. Stud


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: MixBerryCrunch on September 23, 2016, 08:25:39 PM
Kenny Hill rough ridin' sucks
So does his receivers


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Turpin is their entire offense. Their defense is atrocious.
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) on September 23, 2016, 08:57:27 PM
Kenny Hill rough ridin' sucks
So does his receivers


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Where is Kelsey Grammer when you need him?
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: MakeItRain on September 23, 2016, 10:36:57 PM
I wish we had Utah's QB, Troy Williams. Stud


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Yah man, he's lighting the world on fire :rolleyes:
Title: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: That_Guy on September 23, 2016, 11:05:40 PM
I wish we had Utah's QB, Troy Williams. Stud


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Yah man, he's lighting the world on fire :rolleyes:

Also, about every college game I watch I wish we had the talent level as other teams QB's. Do think Ertz will do well and be just fine this year.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: MakeItRain on September 23, 2016, 11:09:33 PM
meat peeper
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: MixBerryCrunch on September 23, 2016, 11:23:55 PM
Utah hc has some brass balls.
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: That_Guy on September 23, 2016, 11:24:45 PM
meat peeper

He has been lighting it up and may have just won them the game.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: Tobias on September 24, 2016, 09:52:41 AM
was hoping to rock chalk this morning.  this b12 lineup is grossssss
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: star seed 7 on September 24, 2016, 10:07:40 AM
was hoping to rock chalk this morning.  this b12 lineup is grossssss

Great Pacific 12 matchups tonight tho
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: The Big Train on September 24, 2016, 10:13:44 AM
Just looked at b12 lineup and can confirm it's terrible
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: treysolid on September 24, 2016, 11:12:32 AM
this FSU/USF game is about to explode.

2 plays total. 2 TDs.
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: star seed 7 on September 24, 2016, 11:53:09 AM
Ugly kit day continues with Iowa state, woof
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: MixBerryCrunch on September 24, 2016, 12:19:39 PM
Next week should be pretty entertaining. We've got a shitty week/good week thing going on right now.
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: The Big Train on September 24, 2016, 02:23:30 PM
These early games suck ass
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: The Big Train on September 24, 2016, 02:24:01 PM
About time for the fighting cdubs tho :emawkid:
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: MixBerryCrunch on September 24, 2016, 03:16:22 PM
How in the hell is Tennessee ranked 14th?
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: wetwillie on September 24, 2016, 03:19:46 PM
Same reason Georgia was #12
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: The Big Train on September 24, 2016, 04:34:04 PM
Clean it up WVU jfc  :flush:
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: catastrophe on September 24, 2016, 04:59:00 PM
Same reason Georgia was #12

SEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEC!

(translation: because Alabama is good)
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: The Big Train on September 24, 2016, 05:36:56 PM
How in the hell is Tennessee ranked 14th?

Because they are gonna beat Florida
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) on September 24, 2016, 06:03:24 PM
Check my top 25 thread, both uf and ut suck donkey taint.
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: Brock Landers on September 24, 2016, 08:31:24 PM
Holy crap that LSU Auburn game ending
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: SkinnyBenny on September 24, 2016, 08:37:13 PM
Holy crap that LSU Auburn game ending

It was unreal. But honestly, LSU had two straight plays that had d00ds who were definitely not set. And I wasn't listening to audio and was watching from kinda far away...on that penalty before the last (non-)play of the game, shouldn't there have been a 10-second runoff? Not sad to see LSU lose. It was definitely the fair ending.
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: wetwillie on September 24, 2016, 08:52:32 PM
War Damn Eagle
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: CHONGS on September 24, 2016, 08:57:40 PM
War Damn Eagle
Yes!
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: Trim on September 24, 2016, 09:01:19 PM
The cowboy on osu's helmets appears green a bunch.
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: MakeItRain on September 24, 2016, 09:15:02 PM
LSU got mumped
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) on September 24, 2016, 09:15:15 PM
OSU is remarkable about gaining yards and not scoring. Both these teams suck
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: wetwillie on September 24, 2016, 09:30:14 PM
https://twitter.com/erickfernandez/status/779852615303790592
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: Super PurpleCat on September 24, 2016, 09:51:40 PM
Auburn deserved that.
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) on September 24, 2016, 10:07:19 PM
Interesting move by David Shaw to run the play clock down to 1 before calling TO down 4.
 :flush:
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) on September 24, 2016, 10:09:51 PM
And then decides to punt. What a tard.
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: michigancat on September 24, 2016, 10:21:53 PM
Interesting move by David Shaw to run the play clock down to 1 before calling TO down 4.
 :flush:
This was actually a great call relative to his subsequent attempts at clock management.
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) on September 24, 2016, 10:23:49 PM
It only took him 59 minutes to realize he has a couple awesome WRs and a very capable qb.
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: Tobias on September 24, 2016, 10:25:49 PM
tell us about oklahoma state
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) on September 24, 2016, 10:27:20 PM
tell us about oklahoma state

They score 3 points for every 100 yards gained.
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: john "teach me how to" dougie on September 24, 2016, 10:32:25 PM
Thank you, Stanford!
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: cfbandyman on September 24, 2016, 10:42:19 PM
These Baylor and OSU teams are just waiting for a semi good team to come along and knock them both on their asses.
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: cfbandyman on September 24, 2016, 10:44:48 PM
 :lol: Jim Grobe going for it on 4th down
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) on September 24, 2016, 10:57:45 PM
I feel like I'm watching the Madden Special Olympics.
#OkievBailor
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: star seed 7 on September 24, 2016, 11:01:47 PM
tell us about oklahoma state

They score 3 points for every 100 yards gained.

Lold irl
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: star seed 7 on September 24, 2016, 11:12:17 PM
Goodness osu smdh
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: mocat on September 24, 2016, 11:30:12 PM
How is anybody supposed to take gundy seriously with that hair
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: joda on September 24, 2016, 11:32:32 PM
An Okie St fan acquaintance of mine tried telling me before the season that Mason Rudolph was easily the most underrated QB in the country. Said he's top 5 of college QBs. :lol:
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: Panjandrum on September 24, 2016, 11:33:36 PM
How is anybody supposed to take gundy seriously with that hair

I'm glad someone is saying what I was thinking.
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: Lucas Scoopsalot on September 24, 2016, 11:35:52 PM
How is anybody supposed to take gundy seriously with that hair

I'm glad someone is saying what I was thinking.
I thought this last weekend. What in the actual eff is on top of his head?
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: The Big Train on September 24, 2016, 11:37:26 PM
I'd be willing to bet mocat had that exact do at some point in the past 10 years
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: SkinnyBenny on September 24, 2016, 11:38:06 PM
LSU got mumped


lol no they didn't
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: MakeItRain on September 25, 2016, 12:22:09 AM
LSU got mumped


lol no they didn't

Yeah, they did. I have no dog in this fight but the technique of that review was mumped. Disclaimer, I didn't see the game only the highlights on watchESPN, so I could be wrong about the review. So it was deemed on the field that LSU got the snap off on time, that replay with the clock on it shouldn't be enough evidence to overturn the call because while you can see an overlay of the clock, you cannot see the white hat and you cannot see when he wound the clock. That clock could have started before the referee wound it but we have no idea. There is also the issue that the overlay of that clock and the video of the gameplay may not be perfectly synced, those are two different cameras put on one graphic. If you recall some cbb replays before the advent of the backboard lights, this was an issue then too. Bottom line is that replay without knowing when the referee wound the clock isn't enough evidence to overturn the call.

I watched the full speed play with headphones on, this is the only way to hear the accompanying whistle with the referee winding the clock, and it is impossible to tell because it looked and sounded as if it was snapped on the whistle. Obviously the replay official does not have the luxury of doing this, they cannot use sound on the replays.
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: MakeItRain on September 25, 2016, 12:30:47 AM
No one should never ever ever complain about our tv contract. There is a top 10 team in the power five playing a close game right now that about 90% of the country can't watch at all, not even on a stream. The Pac 12 network is AIDS.
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: Trim on September 25, 2016, 12:32:51 AM
UA just called timeout with :34 left, 3rd & 3 on about the 10, down 7.
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: MakeItRain on September 25, 2016, 12:37:34 AM
lol, Pac 12 Network is comprised of a dude posting updates on a message board.
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: tdaver on September 25, 2016, 12:38:15 AM
TD zona.  OT. 

Thanks for the reminder that I actually have this station.
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: Trim on September 25, 2016, 12:42:08 AM
lol, Pac 12 Network is comprised of a dude posting updates on a message board.

I got the pac 12 network in wichita and on an app years ago when you still lived there.  And I had to go to BWWEO to watch the 2nd KSU game and jmarkshdtv to watch tonight's.
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: MakeItRain on September 25, 2016, 12:48:19 AM
lol, Pac 12 Network is comprised of a dude posting updates on a message board.

I got the pac 12 network in wichita and on an app years ago when you still lived there.  And I had to go to BWWEO to watch the 2nd KSU game and jmarkshdtv to watch tonight's.

Are you seriously caping up for the Pac 12 Network?
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: Trim on September 25, 2016, 12:53:44 AM
lol, Pac 12 Network is comprised of a dude posting updates on a message board.

I got the pac 12 network in wichita and on an app years ago when you still lived there.  And I had to go to BWWEO to watch the 2nd KSU game and jmarkshdtv to watch tonight's.

Are you seriously caping up for the Pac 12 Network?

No.  But the game's on TV.  And it would be on TV anywhere I've lived.  And UW just won.
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: Trim on September 25, 2016, 12:55:52 AM
We can totally exchange tv provider logins to watch stuff that's only on the other's channel offerings next time it comes up.
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: MakeItRain on September 25, 2016, 01:05:28 AM
We can totally exchange tv provider logins to watch stuff that's only on the other's channel offerings next time it comes up.

I was going to ask you but when I downloaded the Pac 12 app it kept crashing and I couldn't open it. By the time I got it uninstalled and reinstalled I saw the final score on the espn bottom line. :lol:
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: Trim on September 25, 2016, 01:13:36 AM
We can totally exchange tv provider logins to watch stuff that's only on the other's channel offerings next time it comes up.

I was going to ask you but when I downloaded the Pac 12 app it kept crashing and I couldn't open it. By the time I got it uninstalled and reinstalled I saw the final score on the espn bottom line. :lol:

Good, I need a login that gets me SEC network access.
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: MakeItRain on September 25, 2016, 01:37:13 AM
We can totally exchange tv provider logins to watch stuff that's only on the other's channel offerings next time it comes up.

I was going to ask you but when I downloaded the Pac 12 app it kept crashing and I couldn't open it. By the time I got it uninstalled and reinstalled I saw the final score on the espn bottom line. :lol:

Good, I need a login that gets me SEC network access.

You can't get watchESPN?
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: Trim on September 25, 2016, 01:39:24 AM
We can totally exchange tv provider logins to watch stuff that's only on the other's channel offerings next time it comes up.

I was going to ask you but when I downloaded the Pac 12 app it kept crashing and I couldn't open it. By the time I got it uninstalled and reinstalled I saw the final score on the espn bottom line. :lol:

Good, I need a login that gets me SEC network access.

You can't get watchESPN?

I only get via watchespn what I get through my cable provider.
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: ednksu on September 25, 2016, 03:17:59 AM
(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi.imgur.com%2Fw8qIZyk.gif&hash=c8bccb0df9d2670523edeb6de8236db9aa1ed024)
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: wetwillie on September 25, 2016, 10:12:27 AM
I feel like I've seen that before somewhere
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: Gooch on September 25, 2016, 02:12:50 PM
The Pac12 network is in my U-verse package.
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: Gooch on September 25, 2016, 02:14:12 PM
We can totally exchange tv provider logins to watch stuff that's only on the other's channel offerings next time it comes up.

I was going to ask you but when I downloaded the Pac 12 app it kept crashing and I couldn't open it. By the time I got it uninstalled and reinstalled I saw the final score on the espn bottom line. :lol:

Good, I need a login that gets me SEC network access.
ch 1607 on my Slingbox. Feel free to use it whenever. I literally only use it to watch Highly Questionable at work during the week.
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: bucket on September 26, 2016, 06:15:35 PM
Quote
BookMaker.eu opened Houston HC Tom Herman as the favorite to become LSU's next coach.

Herman is +100, while Florida State's Jimbo Fisher is +250. Rounding out the top five are Texas Tech's Kliff Kingsbury (+1400), TCU's Gary Patterson (+1500) and Louisville's Bobby Petrino (+1700). Les Miles was fired following LSU's last-second loss to Auburn.

Source: New Orleans Times-Picayune Sep 26 - 6:52 PM
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: wetwillie on September 26, 2016, 06:22:38 PM
Was Art Briles -900? 
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: bucket on September 26, 2016, 06:42:04 PM
Not yet :kstategrad:
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: Sandstone Outcropping on September 30, 2016, 09:39:15 AM
I think Stanford vs. Washington is an intriguing gridiron matchup.
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: MixBerryCrunch on September 30, 2016, 06:24:54 PM
Does it bother anyone else when commentators use the term "arm talent"? It just hits the ears wrong and sounds really goofy.  I don't know, maybe it's just me. Interesting match-up tonight with Stanford and Washington. Go Cats.
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: kim carnes on September 30, 2016, 08:16:41 PM
West coast football is just so much better.   Idk why
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: Tobias on September 30, 2016, 08:18:43 PM
carnes is correct again (of course)
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: The Big Train on September 30, 2016, 08:19:00 PM
:flush:
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: MixBerryCrunch on September 30, 2016, 08:27:38 PM
I didn't realize Stanford lost both of their starting corners last week. Sucks for them.
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: MixBerryCrunch on September 30, 2016, 08:41:21 PM
Washington is a very unlikable team. Seems fitting for a state full of shitty people.
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: tdaver on October 01, 2016, 12:56:28 AM
This BYU-Toledo game is fun  :emawkid:
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: treysolid on October 01, 2016, 08:52:20 AM
so BYU basically has no defense whatsoever because they just let Toledo hang half a century on them. what this means is that WVU is getting absolutely run today.
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: MakeItRain on October 01, 2016, 11:16:18 AM
That Toledo game is the only BYU game I haven't seen this year; their defense had been very good against at worst decent offenses.
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: EMAWican on October 01, 2016, 11:51:19 AM
Sooooooooooooo how's about that first five minutes of the ND-Syracuse game?
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: treysolid on October 01, 2016, 11:56:31 AM
more pressing, what's up with ISU/Baylor??
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: MakeItRain on October 01, 2016, 12:22:00 PM
more pressing, what's up with ISU/Baylor??

College football, Big 12 defenses, Baylor's fraudulent
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: MakeItRain on October 01, 2016, 12:23:26 PM
We're in the second quarter in Stillwater and OSU have blocked three UT kicks.

Also no one has played a tiny bit of defense
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: BackPayne on October 01, 2016, 12:29:45 PM
Big 12 is just awful.
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: KCFDcat on October 01, 2016, 12:30:49 PM
Every single team in the b12 is beatable by just playing a decent game.
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: MakeItRain on October 01, 2016, 12:37:38 PM
Both of these Big 12 games are comically bad. Fun games but these teams are very very flawed.
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: Gooch on October 01, 2016, 12:38:54 PM
:lol: Baylor
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: MixBerryCrunch on October 01, 2016, 12:43:32 PM
The Big 12 is going to get blown out in the Sugar Bowl.  :frown:
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: star seed 7 on October 01, 2016, 12:45:32 PM
who gives a crap
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: Gooch on October 01, 2016, 12:45:50 PM
I know that in this new age of football they try to limit contact in practice but Texas should really practice tackling more.
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: MakeItRain on October 01, 2016, 12:46:52 PM
The Big 12 is going to get blown out in the Sugar Bowl.  :frown:

I wouldn't be so sure of that given the opponent will be either Tennessee, Georgia, LSU, or Ole Miss.
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: 420seriouscat69 on October 01, 2016, 12:47:35 PM
The Big 12 is going to get blown out in the Sugar Bowl.  :frown:
Would take. If us.
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: MixBerryCrunch on October 01, 2016, 12:48:07 PM
who gives a crap

I do. Lots of people do.
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: MixBerryCrunch on October 01, 2016, 12:51:14 PM
The Big 12 is going to get blown out in the Sugar Bowl.  :frown:
Would take. If us.


Cats vs A&M in the Sugar. I'd take that.
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: 420seriouscat69 on October 01, 2016, 12:52:04 PM
Yes plz
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: wetwillie on October 01, 2016, 01:27:25 PM
Iowa State may actually win this game. 
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: star seed 7 on October 01, 2016, 01:36:14 PM
smdh @ texas
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: kim carnes on October 01, 2016, 01:37:44 PM
It's super weird that u guys are watching college football when the Ryder cup is on
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: MakeItRain on October 01, 2016, 01:38:15 PM
We are now up to 4 XPs blocked in the UT OSU game
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: CHONGS on October 01, 2016, 01:39:58 PM
Game in Ames just got a lot scarier.
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: MakeItRain on October 01, 2016, 01:42:02 PM
Game in Ames just got a lot scarier.

lol
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: wetwillie on October 01, 2016, 01:43:16 PM
smdh @ texas

Charlie will always have that Sunday night victory over Notre Dame. 
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: MakeItRain on October 01, 2016, 01:45:24 PM
smdh @ texas

Charlie will always have that Sunday night victory over Notre Dame.

They're absolutely going to beat either OU, Baylor, or TCU
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: everyone shut up on October 01, 2016, 01:45:32 PM
ISU is going to beat us
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: star seed 7 on October 01, 2016, 01:47:45 PM
That tiny little baby press box cracks me up man
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: 420seriouscat69 on October 01, 2016, 01:47:59 PM
ISU is going to beat us
You're an idiot
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: everyone shut up on October 01, 2016, 01:49:38 PM
ISU is going to beat us
You're an idiot
:blush:
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: MakeItRain on October 01, 2016, 01:50:32 PM
ISU is going to beat us

We already saw Chingon's post bud. Have some self respect and try not to be such a follower.
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: Lucas Scoopsalot on October 01, 2016, 01:52:14 PM
How bad is Baylor? Geesh
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: everyone shut up on October 01, 2016, 01:52:38 PM
ISU is going to beat us

We already saw Chingon's post bud. Have some self respect and try not to be such a follower.
thanks for the advice. #1cat
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: MakeItRain on October 01, 2016, 01:54:00 PM
How bad is Baylor? Geesh

I mean they're probably going to win 5 or 6 conference games
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: Gooch on October 01, 2016, 01:55:05 PM
@mir I'm coming to that hell hole Ames for the cats game. If they lose I'm holding you personally responsible.
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: MakeItRain on October 01, 2016, 01:55:56 PM
Holy crap :lol: the last play of the third quarter of the Baylor ISU game
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: BackPayne on October 01, 2016, 01:56:56 PM
Charlie Strong is gone.
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: MakeItRain on October 01, 2016, 01:57:36 PM
Going into today's game ISU's quarterback had the third worst QBR in the power 5
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: catastrophe on October 01, 2016, 01:57:41 PM
Does Vegas put odds on ISU's chance of blowing this game in the fourth quarter? I'd put it at 50/50.
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: MakeItRain on October 01, 2016, 01:58:29 PM
Charlie Strong is gone.

Nope
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: Gooch on October 01, 2016, 02:03:03 PM
Has it been talked about how shitty Boone Pickens stadium looks inside? That ring of suites is so plain and generic looking.
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: MixBerryCrunch on October 01, 2016, 02:04:17 PM
Baylor may implode after this game. Couldn't happen to a better group of people.
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: Rage Against the McKee on October 01, 2016, 02:05:24 PM
Charlie Strong is gone.

Nope

I don't see him coaching there next year. You don't get a lot of time to start winning at a program like Texas.
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: Big Sam on October 01, 2016, 02:08:36 PM
Game in Ames just got a lot scarier.

Paul Rhoads' plan is finally coming together.  Good for him!    :excited:
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: CHONGS on October 01, 2016, 02:09:41 PM
It's scary because I wrongly thought ISU would be closer to KU ineptness.  Clearly they are not.
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: catastrophe on October 01, 2016, 02:09:44 PM
Probably more like 70/30 now.
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: Gooch on October 01, 2016, 02:10:44 PM
Seeing that POS baby Briles on BU's sideline still infuriates me.
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: Sandstone Outcropping on October 01, 2016, 02:11:26 PM
Washington is a very unlikable team. Seems fitting for a state full of shitty beautiful people who love to watch their Huskies play football the way it is supposed to be played.
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: MakeItRain on October 01, 2016, 02:11:46 PM
It's scary because I wrongly thought ISU would be closer to KU ineptness.  Clearly they are not.

Did you see my Joel Lanning stat?
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: wetwillie on October 01, 2016, 02:15:13 PM
No way they fire chuck until spring 2018
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: CHONGS on October 01, 2016, 02:15:27 PM
It's scary because I wrongly thought ISU would be closer to KU ineptness.  Clearly they are not.

Did you see my Joel Lanning stat?
I did, that will clearly change after today.  Other teams beside KSU can improve as well.  If Rhoades was was still their coach I wouldn't give them that benefit of the doubt.
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: mocat on October 01, 2016, 02:17:42 PM
This is that one ISU game that happens almost every year, nbd guys
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: TheHamburglar on October 01, 2016, 02:19:08 PM
Seeing that POS baby Briles on BU's sideline still infuriates me.

He has to be the one that tried to argue with Brenda Tracy, right?
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: CHONGS on October 01, 2016, 02:19:36 PM
This is that one ISU game that happens almost every year, nbd guys
I hope so mocat, God knows I do.
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: KCFDcat on October 01, 2016, 02:20:00 PM
Remember when they knocked osu out of the natty in 2010(?) classic isu
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: MakeItRain on October 01, 2016, 02:22:36 PM
It's scary because I wrongly thought ISU would be closer to KU ineptness.  Clearly they are not.

Did you see my Joel Lanning stat?
If Rhoades was was still their coach I wouldn't give them that benefit of the doubt.

That's fair. They're going to lose this game though and whenever someone reads too much into one game I'll always post this link http://m.espn.go.com/ncf/gamecast?gameId=400763456&action=recap

Also as it regards to coaching, Iowa State has about a billion penalties for roughly a trillion yards today and they've been doing that all season. I would be surprised if they are in the top 100 nationally in penalties per game.

Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: catastrophe on October 01, 2016, 02:25:52 PM
It's v weird that you guys still think ISU is going to win this game.
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: MakeItRain on October 01, 2016, 02:27:45 PM
Iowa just lost at home to Northwestern :lol: Iowa has two home losses, to Northwestern and North Dakota State
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: MakeItRain on October 01, 2016, 02:28:17 PM
It's v weird that you guys still think ISU is going to win this game.

No one thinks that
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: CHONGS on October 01, 2016, 02:28:56 PM
Iowa just lost at home to Northwestern Iowa has two home losses, to Northwestern and North Dakota State
Woof
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: star seed 7 on October 01, 2016, 02:29:18 PM
purple cats!
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: catastrophe on October 01, 2016, 02:30:44 PM
It's v weird that you guys still think ISU is going to win this game.

No one thinks that

Tough to guess by the posting (minus yours) but ok.
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: star seed 7 on October 01, 2016, 02:33:00 PM
lol, i never knew western virgina had a tiny little baby press box too  :lol:
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: catastrophe on October 01, 2016, 02:48:10 PM
I don't like that Texas looks really good sometimes but then loses games. They're going to end up making some Big 12 front runner look very bad this season.
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: Rage Against the McKee on October 01, 2016, 02:49:16 PM
Texas hasn't looked that good in any game this season.
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: catastrophe on October 01, 2016, 02:50:15 PM
Have you watched the games? It seems like they can run at will for quarters at a time.
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: Nick Florences Beard on October 01, 2016, 02:50:39 PM
Of course Iowa State blew that game.
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: Rage Against the McKee on October 01, 2016, 02:52:43 PM
Have you watched the games? It seems like they can run at will for quarters at a time.

They have the worst defense in the Big 12, outside of maybe Kansas.
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: catastrophe on October 01, 2016, 03:55:35 PM
Defense is definitely their biggest issue, but they still have a big front line that can stop the run and pressure the QB.
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: Gooch on October 01, 2016, 05:29:45 PM
Seeing that POS baby Briles on BU's sideline still infuriates me.

He has to be the one that tried to argue with Brenda Tracy, right?
Highly likely.
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: wetwillie on October 01, 2016, 05:37:09 PM
lets go vols!
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: wetwillie on October 01, 2016, 06:15:40 PM
OMG! Rocky top!
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: chum1 on October 01, 2016, 06:17:38 PM
That was basically back to back hail marys.
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: MakeItRain on October 01, 2016, 10:44:49 PM
Seeing that POS baby Briles on BU's sideline still infuriates me.

He has to be the one that tried to argue with Brenda Tracy, right?
Highly likely.

Bennett was my first guess
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: BackPayne on October 01, 2016, 10:54:56 PM
Louisville vs Clemson  :surprised:  What a game!

Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: MakeItRain on October 01, 2016, 10:57:41 PM
Michigan State just lost to Indiana.
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: OK_Cat on October 01, 2016, 10:57:41 PM
I bet Jackson takes them down to score and win
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: MakeItRain on October 01, 2016, 11:01:20 PM
Both of these teams belong in the CFP.
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: wetwillie on October 01, 2016, 11:05:24 PM
That UL wideout had a pretty poor idea of the first down marker
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: Demo158 on October 01, 2016, 11:05:51 PM
Venzy's laser like focus on the sideline makes me yearn for his leadership in BSFS


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: BackPayne on October 01, 2016, 11:09:05 PM
That UL wideout had a pretty poor idea of the first down marker

No kidding :facepalm:
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: MakeItRain on October 01, 2016, 11:21:51 PM
Poor Lamar
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: ednksu on October 02, 2016, 06:35:59 AM
Seeing that POS baby Briles on BU's sideline still infuriates me.

He has to be the one that tried to argue with Brenda Tracy, right?
Highly likely.

Bennett was my first guess
Jfc just caught up on this..... :sdeek:

That university NEEDS an entire AD death penalty.
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: Trim on October 02, 2016, 11:08:12 AM
It was fun yesterday when iowa state was on a side tv and we'd look up and see they were winning by 1-2 TDs and knew they'd lose somehow and then we missed them actually losing but it didn't matter as we'd already spoiled it for ourselves.
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: MakeItRain on October 02, 2016, 12:17:47 PM
Seeing that POS baby Briles on BU's sideline still infuriates me.

He has to be the one that tried to argue with Brenda Tracy, right?
Highly likely.

Bennett was my first guess
Jfc just caught up on this..... :sdeek:

That university NEEDS an entire AD death penalty.

Tennessee is worse
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: ednksu on October 02, 2016, 01:03:58 PM
Seeing that POS baby Briles on BU's sideline still infuriates me.

He has to be the one that tried to argue with Brenda Tracy, right?
Highly likely.

Bennett was my first guess
Jfc just caught up on this..... :sdeek:

That university NEEDS an entire AD death penalty.

Tennessee is worse

Whats your analysis behind that?  I know Tenn has done some shady stuff, but I didn't think they had approached anything close to the top to bottom issues Baylor is having (and denying).
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: MakeItRain on October 02, 2016, 02:10:41 PM
Seeing that POS baby Briles on BU's sideline still infuriates me.

He has to be the one that tried to argue with Brenda Tracy, right?
Highly likely.

Bennett was my first guess
Jfc just caught up on this..... :sdeek:

That university NEEDS an entire AD death penalty.

Tennessee is worse

Whats your analysis behind that?  I know Tenn has done some shady stuff, but I didn't think they had approached anything close to the top to bottom issues Baylor is having (and denying).

The police department was reporting to the coach and the coach called one of his players a traitor for helping a rape victim and the reportedly watched the same player get jumped by some other members of the football team.

This stuff has all been reported, anytime ESPN wants to do an Outside The Lines the story is just sitting there getting grosser with each Burch Jones win. I can't for the life of me figure out why they won't investigate though.
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: ednksu on October 02, 2016, 03:09:14 PM
Okay I remember the story about them tossing the player under the bus at a team meeting/lockerroom thing.  I don't think I knew they jumped him afterwards. 

Which is worse thought, ignoring it or going full Ken Starr?
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: kslim on October 02, 2016, 03:39:57 PM
http://www.tennessean.com/story/sports/college/vols/2016/02/24/lawsuit-tennessee-coach-butch-jones-called-player-traitor/80851232/
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: KST8FAN on October 02, 2016, 04:19:44 PM
Of course Iowa State blew that game.
http://www.desmoinesregister.com/story/sports/college/iowa-state/cyclone-insider/2016/10/02/troy-davis-iowa-state-cyclones-public-intoxication/91432122/


Tom

Sent from my SM-G920V using Tapatalk

Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: ednksu on October 02, 2016, 04:34:34 PM
Of course Iowa State blew that game.
http://www.desmoinesregister.com/story/sports/college/iowa-state/cyclone-insider/2016/10/02/troy-davis-iowa-state-cyclones-public-intoxication/91432122/


Tom

Sent from my SM-G920V using Tapatalk

How the eff does the university not have some handlers to escort vips around is beyond me. 
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: MakeItRain on October 02, 2016, 08:30:26 PM
Of course Iowa State blew that game.
http://www.desmoinesregister.com/story/sports/college/iowa-state/cyclone-insider/2016/10/02/troy-davis-iowa-state-cyclones-public-intoxication/91432122/


Tom

Sent from my SM-G920V using Tapatalk

How is it okay to give someone a public intox while walking around outside in a bar district?
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: Trim on October 02, 2016, 08:32:43 PM
Of course Iowa State blew that game.
http://www.desmoinesregister.com/story/sports/college/iowa-state/cyclone-insider/2016/10/02/troy-davis-iowa-state-cyclones-public-intoxication/91432122/


Tom

Sent from my SM-G920V using Tapatalk

How is it okay to give someone a public intox while walking around outside in a bar district?

NO crap, OKLAHOMA CITY.
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: MakeItRain on October 06, 2016, 11:37:41 PM
Example 24,854 of Butch Jones being a piece of crap. So the Florida LSU game was cancelled on Saturday for very rough ridin' obvious reasons. Here's Butch's take

https://twitter.com/GrantRamey/status/784128773910368256

eff that hurricane, play football bitches
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: MadCat on October 07, 2016, 01:23:15 AM
Sustained winds of 140 mph?  That's like having an F2 tornado sit on top of your house for hours.


Nope.
 :buh-bye:
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: meow meow on October 07, 2016, 08:26:19 AM
i'd actually watch a game played in 100+ mph winds and downpouring rain.  on the tv obvs, but still.
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: Brock Landers on October 07, 2016, 09:18:09 AM
Ertz might complete some long balls if he was throwing into a hurricane force wind.
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: star seed 7 on October 08, 2016, 11:51:52 AM
Pitts throwbacks look good
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: Brock Landers on October 08, 2016, 01:55:47 PM
3rd quarter of the OU-Texas game has been bananas
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: Big Sam on October 08, 2016, 02:53:12 PM
Maybe OU will run out of players by the time K-State plays them.
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: Tobias on October 08, 2016, 04:42:23 PM
however this ends will be very iowa state-y
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: Tobias on October 08, 2016, 05:01:15 PM
oh man get in here FSD
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: Rage Against the McKee on October 08, 2016, 05:05:23 PM
ISU looks better than OSU at pretty much everything.
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: catastrophe on October 08, 2016, 05:08:48 PM
ISU at it again. What are the odds of another fourth quarter meltdown? I'm putting it at 40/60.
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: Tobias on October 08, 2016, 05:15:15 PM
it begins :excited:
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: catastrophe on October 08, 2016, 05:19:42 PM
Or third quarter meltdown.
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: Big Sam on October 08, 2016, 05:22:34 PM
Watchin' Navy and Houston on CBS Sports Network.  Last week got held to something like 47 yards by Air Force.  But elite-y Houston not likin' Annapolis.  43-33 with 5:39 left.  Middies running it down Cougar throats.
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: Tobias on October 08, 2016, 05:48:25 PM
Iowa state :lol:
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: BackPayne on October 08, 2016, 05:48:45 PM
JFC, Iowa State. :facepalm:
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: MakeItRain on October 08, 2016, 07:55:28 PM
:lol: I don't even taunt therm anymore, they are pathetic
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) on October 08, 2016, 09:51:09 PM
If lhcbs has dinkmentia, then david shaw has downs syndrome cubed.
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) on October 08, 2016, 10:41:16 PM
Stanfords stadium is lol lame as eff
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: michigancat on October 09, 2016, 12:36:13 AM
Stanfords stadium is lol lame as eff
Turns out their team is also terrible
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: Panjandrum on October 09, 2016, 02:34:53 AM
The PAC 12 is lucky to have UW, because the rest of the conference is as dogshit as ours.
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: EMAWzifried on October 09, 2016, 09:19:54 AM
After the Stanford game, my thought was any legitimate top-20 Cats team would have left that stadium with a three TD victory. It says something about how bad the B12 is this year that we're kind of going to contend.
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: MakeItRain on October 15, 2016, 02:41:45 PM
Clemsoning
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: ednksu on October 15, 2016, 08:35:34 PM
This Wisc tOSU game has been fun so far.  Good coaches, great athletes, amazing venue.   
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: everyone shut up on October 15, 2016, 09:34:51 PM
do we want Bert to win?
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: SdK on October 15, 2016, 09:56:29 PM
I want OSU to lose. I always cheer for the lower ranked squad.
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: TheHamburglar on October 15, 2016, 10:15:31 PM
I'm coming up next week and staying with my parents in Salina.  Instead of going to Manhattan, should I stay in Salina and go watch the 6-1 KW Coyotes take on hated rival Bethany or head west to Hays and watch the 5-2 FHSU Tigers take on Missouri Western?
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: Pete on October 15, 2016, 10:19:56 PM
I love Wisconsin as a State, as a program, and a fan base. 
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: SdK on October 15, 2016, 10:35:34 PM
Oh crap. Scony has this
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: Canary on October 15, 2016, 10:51:51 PM
I want OSU to lose. I always cheer for the lower ranked squad.
I like Urban M. too much to cheer against them.
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: SdK on October 15, 2016, 10:53:57 PM
Boo you. Go Sconnie!
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: SdK on October 15, 2016, 10:54:17 PM
Damnit.
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: CHONGS on October 15, 2016, 10:59:02 PM
Meyer v saban champ game would be pretty awesome
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: Canary on October 15, 2016, 10:59:51 PM
Meyer v saban champ game would be pretty awesome

Agreed!
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: Pete on October 15, 2016, 11:11:42 PM
Meyer v saban champ game would be pretty awesome

Agreed!

It's going to be Meyer vs Harbaugh to see who gets to play Wisconsin again.  That game will be a doozy.
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: ednksu on October 15, 2016, 11:13:04 PM
Really not pleased with all the calls in that.  Lots of blown holding calls that really helped tOSU.  I think the refs did make the right call overturning that interception though that hurt tOSU.
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: MakeItRain on October 16, 2016, 02:50:34 AM
https://twitter.com/NDonNBC/status/787440741786132480
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: tdaver on October 20, 2016, 10:40:15 PM
BYU horrible fake punt on 4th and 19 from their own 5.  Then holds Boise St to a missed field goal.  :lol:
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: Tobias on October 20, 2016, 11:59:17 PM
this is some pretty fun #afterdark'n
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: ednksu on October 21, 2016, 01:21:52 AM
That was an interesting ending.


Question, should the clock have kept running on byu since there wasn't a change in possession?  Or is a blocked kick like that treated more like an incomplete pass for the purposes of the clock?
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: MakeItRain on October 21, 2016, 01:40:06 AM
The clock should have kept running, that was a live ball. Actually the clock should have stopped because Boise should have gotten a 15 yard penalty.
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: ednksu on October 21, 2016, 05:36:01 AM
The clock should have kept running, that was a live ball. Actually the clock should have stopped because Boise should have gotten a 15 yard penalty.
because they were running around rushing the field? (For the penalty)
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: MakeItRain on October 21, 2016, 11:27:54 AM
The clock should have kept running, that was a live ball. Actually the clock should have stopped because Boise should have gotten a 15 yard penalty.
because they were running around rushing the field? (For the penalty)

Yep
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: wetwillie on October 21, 2016, 10:48:24 PM
Did Oregon finally run out of chip kelly recruits?  It's amazing to me that they could be this shitty.
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: Tobias on October 22, 2016, 12:24:46 AM
finally checking in for #afterdark :excited:
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: Tobias on October 22, 2016, 01:20:02 AM
man this one is ugly, shaping up for a good finish
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: Tobias on October 22, 2016, 01:33:04 AM
after #afterdark!
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: sys on October 22, 2016, 01:44:03 AM
i am very surprised to find a college football game being played right now.
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: Tobias on October 22, 2016, 01:48:06 AM
sys, you should consult lib and i for appropriate cfb viewing opportunities
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: Tobias on October 22, 2016, 01:50:04 AM
basically the rule is pac 12 after dark first (sometimes cats), then everything else
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: sys on October 22, 2016, 01:51:57 AM
it's more gratifying to just stumble across them, sometimes.
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: sys on October 22, 2016, 01:53:12 AM
california appears to be playing very illegally.
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: Tobias on October 22, 2016, 01:54:22 AM
oh definitely.  tonight was a "huh - it's midnight, anything going on?" amazing game
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: sys on October 22, 2016, 01:56:26 AM
we won!  it's a miracle.
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: Tobias on October 22, 2016, 01:57:03 AM
did not have the feeling that we'd pull it off, but here we are!
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: Tobias on October 22, 2016, 01:57:14 AM
we won!  it's a miracle.

yes!
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: Big Sam on October 22, 2016, 03:40:30 PM
If Mizzou having issues with Middle Tennessee in Tiggerville.

I hope they turn it around soon.  I sort of feel bad for them (well, sort of).  They are already in the turd division of the SEC.  Already trailing traditional turds such as Kentucky and Vandy.  What happens if they cannot beat a directional school for homecoming?  Will the crowd start chanting "S-E-C!  S-E-C!"
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: cDubya on October 22, 2016, 05:43:40 PM
 :ohno:
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: mocat on October 22, 2016, 06:04:46 PM
Wvu looks wv good
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: Big Sam on October 22, 2016, 06:06:14 PM
How 'bout Navy.  Middies lookin' tough.
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: kso_FAN on October 22, 2016, 06:10:52 PM
Wvu looks wv good

We should have beat them. :(
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: wetwillie on October 22, 2016, 06:11:47 PM
War eagle is pimp slapping pig Aggie my goodness.
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: MakeItRain on October 22, 2016, 06:20:33 PM
Mizzou blows
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: BackPayne on October 22, 2016, 06:29:04 PM
War eagle is pimp slapping pig Aggie my goodness.

Holy crap! Just looked at the score.
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: kso_FAN on October 22, 2016, 06:29:47 PM
I don't use this loosely; Saban is the GOAT. Without question. Simply an amazing football coach.
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: CHONGS on October 22, 2016, 06:44:39 PM
I don't use this loosely; Saban is the GOAT. Without question. Simply an amazing football coach.
I dunno he and Meyer are neck and neck.  Those two however are clearly on top by a large margin.
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: Cartierfor3 on October 22, 2016, 06:45:34 PM
I don't use this loosely; Saban is the GOAT. Without question. Simply an amazing football coach.

college football right now reminds me of MLB from 96-04. Yankees and everyone else. They might not win every year but they are above the rest of it
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: kso_FAN on October 22, 2016, 06:49:18 PM
I don't use this loosely; Saban is the GOAT. Without question. Simply an amazing football coach.
I dunno he and Meyer are neck and neck.  Those two however are clearly on top by a large margin.

Meyer is fantastic. 3 titles in his last 9 years of coaching, but Saban has 5 in his last 11. If he gets another this year, 6 titles as a coach over 12 years is probably something we may never see again.
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: Cartierfor3 on October 22, 2016, 06:55:35 PM
you know what's bananas. only 4 current coaches have a 'ship. Stoops, Fisher, Saban, Meyer.
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: cDubya on October 22, 2016, 06:58:18 PM
you know what's bananas. only 4 current coaches have a 'ship. Stoops, Fisher, Saban, Meyer.

Thats seriously nuts. Jeez.
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: IPA4Me on October 22, 2016, 06:59:07 PM
Mizzou. Hahahaha
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: wetwillie on October 22, 2016, 07:00:56 PM
you know what's bananas. only 4 current coaches have a 'ship. Stoops, Fisher, Saban, Meyer.

And 2 of the 4 have only 1 :sdeek:
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: michigancat on October 22, 2016, 07:02:20 PM


you know what's bananas. only 4 current coaches have a 'ship. Stoops, Fisher, Saban, Meyer.

And 2 of the 4 have only 1 :sdeek:

And 1 of those was 15 years ago
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: CHONGS on October 22, 2016, 07:03:34 PM
I don't use this loosely; Saban is the GOAT. Without question. Simply an amazing football coach.
I dunno he and Meyer are neck and neck.  Those two however are clearly on top by a large margin.

Meyer is fantastic. 3 titles in his last 9 years of coaching, but Saban has 5 in his last 11. If he gets another this year, 6 titles as a coach over 12 years is probably something we may never see again.
Yeah, if Meyer can win this year my argument would be better.
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: kso_FAN on October 22, 2016, 07:07:19 PM
I don't use this loosely; Saban is the GOAT. Without question. Simply an amazing football coach.
I dunno he and Meyer are neck and neck.  Those two however are clearly on top by a large margin.

Meyer is fantastic. 3 titles in his last 9 years of coaching, but Saban has 5 in his last 11. If he gets another this year, 6 titles as a coach over 12 years is probably something we may never see again.
Yeah, if Meyer can win this year my argument would be better.

I just want to see Saban vs Meyer. If Saban wins, he's the GOAT.
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: sys on October 22, 2016, 07:09:22 PM
a small number of years ago missouri was in the big 12 and then they left and today they lost to middle tennessee.  you can't make this stuff up.
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: CHONGS on October 22, 2016, 07:11:17 PM
a small number of years ago missouri was in the big 12 and then they left and today they lost to middle tennessee.  you can't make this stuff up.
eff em.  Sow the wind and you reap the Barry.
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: kso_FAN on October 22, 2016, 07:14:09 PM
a small number of years ago missouri was in the big 12 and then they left and today they lost to middle tennessee.  you can't make this stuff up.

SEC SEC SEC
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: kso_FAN on October 22, 2016, 07:14:36 PM
Hey, at least they have basketball.

Oh wait.
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: michigancat on October 22, 2016, 07:27:23 PM
I watched a bit of the bama game today and they have two sophomores and a freshman starting on their OL. :sdeek:
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: Big Sam on October 22, 2016, 07:29:01 PM
Hey, at least they have basketball.

Oh wait.

Kickass rivalries?
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: WillieWatanabe on October 22, 2016, 07:29:58 PM
How much longer does Kliff got?
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: CHONGS on October 22, 2016, 07:31:58 PM
How much longer does Kliff got?
Should have been fired last year.  Hard to follow a legend tho.
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: MakeItRain on October 22, 2016, 07:42:48 PM
How much longer does Kliff got?
Should have been fired last year.  Hard to follow a legend tho.

LOL, Chingon is great.
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: kso_FAN on October 22, 2016, 07:53:15 PM
Houston. Ouch.
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: Big Sam on October 22, 2016, 08:47:26 PM
Houston. Ouch.

Maybe this will ignite the talk to add SMU to the confy....
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: Panjandrum on October 22, 2016, 09:08:36 PM
Houston. Ouch.

I think the one two punch of the Navy loss plus the Big 12 rejection kind of took the wind from their sails.
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: Pete on October 22, 2016, 09:20:44 PM
Houston. Ouch.

I think the one two punch of the Navy loss plus the Big 12 rejection kind of took the wind from their sails.


They are certainly on suicide watch down there.
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: SdK on October 22, 2016, 09:28:50 PM
I don't use this loosely; Saban is the GOAT. Without question. Simply an amazing football coach.
I dunno he and Meyer are neck and neck.  Those two however are clearly on top by a large margin.

Meyer is fantastic. 3 titles in his last 9 years of coaching, but Saban has 5 in his last 11. If he gets another this year, 6 titles as a coach over 12 years is probably something we may never see again.
Yeah, if Meyer can win this year my argument would be better.
Meyer will get another one this year. Saban will not.
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: MakeItRain on October 22, 2016, 10:28:06 PM
Oh crap!
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: EMAWzifried on October 22, 2016, 10:38:18 PM
Can T Tech get one stop and win this thing?
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: kso_FAN on October 22, 2016, 10:44:47 PM
I don't use this loosely; Saban is the GOAT. Without question. Simply an amazing football coach.
I dunno he and Meyer are neck and neck.  Those two however are clearly on top by a large margin.

Meyer is fantastic. 3 titles in his last 9 years of coaching, but Saban has 5 in his last 11. If he gets another this year, 6 titles as a coach over 12 years is probably something we may never see again.
Yeah, if Meyer can win this year my argument would be better.
Meyer will get another one this year. Saban will not.

The chances of this meeting were just reduced.

Former Wildcat James Franklin!
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: CHONGS on October 22, 2016, 10:48:40 PM
I don't use this loosely; Saban is the GOAT. Without question. Simply an amazing football coach.
I dunno he and Meyer are neck and neck.  Those two however are clearly on top by a large margin.

Meyer is fantastic. 3 titles in his last 9 years of coaching, but Saban has 5 in his last 11. If he gets another this year, 6 titles as a coach over 12 years is probably something we may never see again.
Yeah, if Meyer can win this year my argument would be better.
Meyer will get another one this year. Saban will not.

The chances of this meeting were just reduced.

Former Wildcat James Franklin!
Crazy comeback there.
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: sys on October 22, 2016, 10:54:00 PM
Can T Tech get one stop and win this thing?

seems unlikely.
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: SdK on October 22, 2016, 11:02:31 PM
I don't use this loosely; Saban is the GOAT. Without question. Simply an amazing football coach.
I dunno he and Meyer are neck and neck.  Those two however are clearly on top by a large margin.

Meyer is fantastic. 3 titles in his last 9 years of coaching, but Saban has 5 in his last 11. If he gets another this year, 6 titles as a coach over 12 years is probably something we may never see again.
Yeah, if Meyer can win this year my argument would be better.
Meyer will get another one this year. Saban will not.

The chances of this meeting were just reduced.

Former Wildcat James Franklin!
Nah. Unchanged. They had to win the Big 10 before and they still have to.
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: SdK on October 22, 2016, 11:03:19 PM
It'll be just like last time Meyers team faced Sabans
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: MakeItRain on October 22, 2016, 11:12:25 PM
This OU Tech game deserves its own thread, this is nuts. Also Mahomes should quit now to save his body for the NFL.
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: kso_FAN on October 22, 2016, 11:15:37 PM
Tech should just onside kick every time. And never punt.
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: kso_FAN on October 22, 2016, 11:20:18 PM
Just crazy.

(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fuploads.tapatalk-cdn.com%2F20161023%2Ff0bbf523d1f0a87071a6efb8e69a7b5c.png&hash=daabdf6b968563b93e75c9b238a9bcdc55d367b8)
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: MakeItRain on October 22, 2016, 11:24:38 PM
More helpless situation for the fans; OC Dana Dimel at K-State or DC Mike Stoops at OU?
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: EMAWzifried on October 22, 2016, 11:29:48 PM
Tech should just onside kick every time. And never punt.
And go for 2 after every TD.
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: Trim on October 23, 2016, 12:28:37 AM
https://twitter.com/Prehmmr247/status/790059612091232256
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: Trim on October 23, 2016, 12:44:00 AM
Less viakoffman version:

https://twitter.com/Deadspin/status/790060243778756608
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: everyone shut up on October 23, 2016, 11:18:20 AM
What did leach do?
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: Trim on October 23, 2016, 11:31:57 AM
What did leach do?

Earlier in the week, he very sarcastically accused ASU of having a technologically advanced control center to coordinate sign-stealing.
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: michigancat on October 23, 2016, 11:32:59 AM
What did leach do?
He publicly said Graham steals signs. Seems like the chickenshit thing to do would be to privately grumble about it but whatever.
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: WillieWatanabe on October 23, 2016, 12:46:22 PM
I can't take Graham serious since he wore that tiny headset.
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: sonofdaxjones on October 23, 2016, 01:32:13 PM
"Ithink they still steal signs. We’ll have to keep an eye on that. That’s certainly the reputation, and I think they have technology and expertise on the subject, which if they ever go to a different conference or something, I’d certainly like them to share it with us."

Many people are saying that Leach should wait for some proof here, but whatever. He’d go on to call ASU’s sign theft an “unsavory practice” and said the Sun Devils have “a whole command center designed around this stuff.”
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: pissclams on October 23, 2016, 01:37:23 PM
leach is a dumbass
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: star seed 7 on October 23, 2016, 01:38:34 PM
You heard it first from black cats and now leach confirms: asu is looking to change conferences
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: Gooch on October 23, 2016, 01:50:31 PM
More helpless situation for the fans; OC Dana Dimel at K-State or DC Mike Stoops at OU?
Stoops could actually be fired unlike Dimel.
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: KCFDcat on October 23, 2016, 01:54:44 PM
More helpless situation for the fans; OC Dana Dimel at K-State or DC Mike Stoops at OU?
Stoops could actually be fired unlike Dimel.
That'd be a pretty great Christmas dinner. "Hey bro good to see you, remember when you fired me from my job? Can you pass the gravy?"
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: Trim on October 23, 2016, 02:20:40 PM
Here's the story on this week's events and how it goes back to last year: http://www.seattletimes.com/sports/wsu-cougar-football/wsus-mike-leach-reignites-signalgate-debate-does-arizona-state-steal-opponents-signals/

https://twitter.com/DarnayTripp/status/788200972426379264

Postgame: http://www.seattletimes.com/video/5181746696001/wsus-mike-leach-channels-his-inner-marshawn-lynch
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: Trim on October 23, 2016, 02:21:20 PM
Your move, The Animal.
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) on October 23, 2016, 02:32:19 PM
Todd Graham is a baby, and Leach played him.
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: pissclams on October 23, 2016, 02:39:28 PM
Todd Graham is a baby, and Leach played him.

you got it backwards, but ya
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: mocat on October 29, 2016, 12:37:50 PM
(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fuploads.tapatalk-cdn.com%2F20161029%2Fe49aaa21f75894636937b560f2d306e8.jpg&hash=8248033237b9435a37f6d42df5aebb9a9ba51286)
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: cfbandyman on October 29, 2016, 12:47:06 PM
Such a glorious flowing mane. He does know how to connect with his fan base.
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: BackPayne on October 29, 2016, 12:50:36 PM
Tom Herman's team is looking like crap now.
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: Katpappy on October 29, 2016, 01:49:43 PM
Weird thing today.  ESPN Gameday at a FSI game site; and Corsaeo picks Iowa State.  Herb tells him to look at the record.  (https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2FgoEMAW.com%2Fforum%2FSmileys%2FgoEMAW%2FROFL.gif&hash=6bba8807037f47549325f7bacc2721aa5071ac45)
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: CHONGS on October 29, 2016, 02:53:45 PM
Weird thing today.  ESPN Gameday at a FSI game site; and Corsaeo picks Iowa State.  Herb tells him to look at the record.  (https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2FgoEMAW.com%2Fforum%2FSmileys%2FgoEMAW%2FROFL.gif&hash=6bba8807037f47549325f7bacc2721aa5071ac45)
Corso wins!
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: star seed 7 on October 29, 2016, 04:46:08 PM
hook 'em
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: MakeItRain on October 29, 2016, 04:59:23 PM
These 2:30 kickoffs have been very good.
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: BostonPancake on October 29, 2016, 05:06:54 PM
Go Northwestern!
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: kso_FAN on October 29, 2016, 06:05:23 PM
I'm trying to decide which is more surprising...

TCU only scored 17 at home in regulation against Tech's defense...

Or Tech only scored 17 against TCU's defense...
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: cfbandyman on October 29, 2016, 06:20:51 PM
Come on Texas...
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: catastrophe on October 29, 2016, 06:23:02 PM
Tech used up all those points last week.
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: cfbandyman on October 29, 2016, 06:39:12 PM
Texas game  :bwpopcorn:
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: kso_FAN on October 29, 2016, 06:43:41 PM
Texas game  :bwpopcorn:

Everyone runs dumb plays.
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: cfbandyman on October 29, 2016, 06:48:19 PM
Texas game  :bwpopcorn:

Everyone runs dumb plays.

Yup, and Seth Russell lololololol
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: cfbandyman on October 29, 2016, 06:49:47 PM
What a terrible call. Damn refs
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: kso_FAN on October 29, 2016, 06:51:48 PM
(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fmedia.culturemap.com%2Fcrop%2F19%2Ff7%2F633x475%2FMatthew-McConaughey-University-of-Texas-Austin-longhorn-hook-em_105808.jpg&hash=d4bc0c9038a1c590abca129eabd544eff89ab662)
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: catastrophe on October 29, 2016, 06:54:34 PM
Big 12 hopes of a playoff team died today, but still good football was watched by all.
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: Katpappy on October 29, 2016, 07:09:32 PM
Neither one of those turds had a chance anyway.
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: Trim on October 29, 2016, 07:10:45 PM
I think Gundy's sunglasses might be the same ones I keep in my car, but I'm already set for Halloween.
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: star seed 7 on October 29, 2016, 07:11:54 PM
(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fmedia.culturemap.com%2Fcrop%2F19%2Ff7%2F633x475%2FMatthew-McConaughey-University-of-Texas-Austin-longhorn-hook-em_105808.jpg&hash=d4bc0c9038a1c590abca129eabd544eff89ab662)

 :thumbs:
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: CHONGS on October 29, 2016, 07:13:27 PM
Big 12 didn't deserve a playoff slot anyway.
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: DOD Take 2 on October 29, 2016, 07:29:14 PM
Baylor's last drive was a complete WTF. No idea what they were thinking. Their offense seems broken
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: Rage Against the McKee on October 29, 2016, 07:41:47 PM
It was amazing to me that Texas didn't run the play clock to zero if they were just going to run straight right, anyway.
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: Katpappy on October 29, 2016, 07:51:23 PM
That was a total WTF last drive for Texas... run the clock down, but it worked out for them anyway.
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: CHONGS on October 29, 2016, 09:46:44 PM
Auburn looking great, love watching their run game when it's rolling.
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: Trim on October 31, 2016, 11:47:12 AM
I was offered free tix to Cal/Texas and turned them down

Get free tix to Cal/UW and I'll come down.  I want the bobblehead.

I'll ask. Might not be able to go though. so many bay area entertainment options, maybe I'll be at a concert or something.

Fun!

Rusty, don't forget to get us tickets to this game, or at least try to have someone that's going get and sell me the Marshawn bobblehead.
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: Trim on October 31, 2016, 11:20:59 PM
:lol:

http://www.thenewstribune.com/sports/article111643987.html
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: Katpappy on November 01, 2016, 03:15:59 AM
:lol:

http://www.thenewstribune.com/sports/article111643987.html
If only Grundy would talk to his players.  Assholes always trying to hurt our QB(players).
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: Rage Against the McKee on November 01, 2016, 08:45:24 AM
At first I thought "wow, how drunk do you have to be to get arrested for public intox at a football game?" But then I realized it was TCU and they probably love locking people up for drinking.
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: Skipper44 on November 01, 2016, 09:02:55 AM
I enjoy the fact that it went down in the TCU student section
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: MakeItRain on November 02, 2016, 11:24:06 AM
https://twitter.com/Heartland_CS/status/793848028264296450
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: Gooch on November 02, 2016, 12:27:30 PM
https://twitter.com/Heartland_CS/status/793848028264296450
To Twitter! Be right back  :buh-bye:
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: BIG APPLE CAT on November 02, 2016, 02:42:44 PM
Most likely a typo. I'm sure they meant suspended for 1 play, like with Westbrook
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: Trim on November 02, 2016, 03:01:43 PM
https://twitter.com/LombardiESPN/status/793880648918282240
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: MakeItRain on November 02, 2016, 03:05:37 PM
https://twitter.com/Heartland_CS/status/793848028264296450
To Twitter! Be right back  :buh-bye:

 :impatient:
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: michigancat on November 02, 2016, 03:37:50 PM
https://twitter.com/LombardiESPN/status/793880648918282240

holy crap
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: MakeItRain on November 02, 2016, 03:44:20 PM
Go get one for the auction next summer, I want it.
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: Trim on November 02, 2016, 03:48:53 PM
https://twitter.com/LombardiESPN/status/793880648918282240

holy crap

Tickets?
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: michigancat on November 02, 2016, 03:49:23 PM
I immediately asked my Cal ticket source about it and he said he was going to the game. Going to still try to get one.
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: Trim on November 02, 2016, 03:59:11 PM
I immediately asked my Cal ticket source about it and he said he was going to the game. Going to still try to get one.

I don't know what the black market price will be for one but I'll pay.
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: michigancat on November 02, 2016, 03:59:53 PM
If my coworker gets one, he says I can have it and I'll donate it to fattyfest.
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: Trim on November 02, 2016, 04:06:17 PM
If my coworker gets one, he says I can have it and I'll donate it to fattyfest.

:thumbs:

I'm getting it and displaying it w/my 'hawks Marshawn funko guy that he signed for me.

(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi709.photobucket.com%2Falbums%2Fww92%2FTommyRoanoke%2FDSC_0224_zpsmxwcpezd.jpg&hash=197d13d44d7a7bcb6ddacf0d7fdaec555ec42948) (http://s709.photobucket.com/user/TommyRoanoke/media/DSC_0224_zpsmxwcpezd.jpg.html)
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: pissclams on November 03, 2016, 07:33:31 PM
i smell some tasty gems cooking in this ou-iowa st game  :party:
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: Tobias on November 03, 2016, 07:34:32 PM
couple of fun games tonight
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: pissclams on November 03, 2016, 07:50:59 PM
oh man these isu gems are going to be the biggest most expensive gems ever.  does that mean rare?  no?
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: wetwillie on November 03, 2016, 07:51:43 PM
Man that ginger ISU kid was amaze.
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: Big Sam on November 03, 2016, 07:53:55 PM
I feel so bad for flood aggie watching this game.  Once again, they are competitive during the first half, raising the fans' hopes.  When it comes crashing down in the second half quarter, again, it will only crush them a bit more.

KU has no hope, so their fans' can live with the losses.  ISU hasn't given up, so the hurt more.

(Mid-post edit due to Westbrook catch.)
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: BackPayne on November 03, 2016, 10:42:10 PM
Colorado vs UCLA...holy crap the personal fouls!
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: MakeItRain on November 03, 2016, 10:53:02 PM
The last one was complete trash. I forgot how shitty CU fans are, I wonder if they're even watching this game.

Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) on November 03, 2016, 10:53:33 PM
Can you imagine how rough ridin' miserable life must be if you are ever relegated to treasuring a bobble-hovel?  #leftcoast-distopia.
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: kso_FAN on November 04, 2016, 09:25:11 AM
For some strange reason, I am enjoying Colorado being decent again. NU and MU I want to lose every week, I don't really care about aTm, but CU I find myself cheering for, despite all the snarkiness towards Snyder and JUCOs, etc. back in the day.
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: 'taterblast on November 04, 2016, 09:33:08 AM
For some strange reason, I am enjoying Colorado being decent again. NU and MU I want to lose every week, I don't really care about aTm, but CU I find myself cheering for, despite all the snarkiness towards Snyder and JUCOs, etc. back in the day.

i was watching them last night thinking they might be my favorite non-cats school now. there's nothing to dislike about them. also this:

https://twitter.com/TailgateHeisman/status/794359834737016832
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: mocat on November 04, 2016, 12:27:25 PM
oh really announcer guy, that's the iceland world cup chant? how did iceland do in the world cup? idiot
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: That_Guy on November 04, 2016, 01:00:03 PM
For some strange reason, I am enjoying Colorado being decent again. NU and MU I want to lose every week, I don't really care about aTm, but CU I find myself cheering for, despite all the snarkiness towards Snyder and JUCOs, etc. back in the day.

i was watching them last night thinking they might be my favorite non-cats school now. there's nothing to dislike about them. also this:

https://twitter.com/TailgateHeisman/status/794359834737016832

Good for CU, seems like fun times!


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: pissclams on November 04, 2016, 01:12:12 PM
never been a CU fan at all, they've always worn their k-state jealousy on the sleeve of their marmot jackets.  they want to be us so bad it gets really annoying, so f those guys
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: Katpappy on November 04, 2016, 01:23:04 PM
never been a CU fan at all, they've always worn their k-state jealousy on the sleeve of their marmot jackets.  they want to be us so bad it gets really annoying, so f those guys
:thumbs:
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: MakeItRain on November 04, 2016, 01:32:02 PM
For some strange reason, I am enjoying Colorado being decent again. NU and MU I want to lose every week, I don't really care about aTm, but CU I find myself cheering for, despite all the snarkiness towards Snyder and JUCOs, etc. back in the day.

i was watching them last night thinking they might be my favorite non-cats school now. there's nothing to dislike about them. also this:

https://twitter.com/TailgateHeisman/status/794359834737016832

There is a huge ton to dislike about them. This might be an age and geography issue. I hate them a million times more than I hate Mizzou and KU.
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: Katpappy on November 04, 2016, 01:32:58 PM
For some strange reason, I am enjoying Colorado being decent again. NU and MU I want to lose every week, I don't really care about aTm, but CU I find myself cheering for, despite all the snarkiness towards Snyder and JUCOs, etc. back in the day.

i was watching them last night thinking they might be my favorite non-cats school now. there's nothing to dislike about them. also this:

https://twitter.com/TailgateHeisman/status/794359834737016832

There is a huge ton to dislike about them. This might be an age and geography issue. I hate them a million times more than I hate Mizzou and KU.
:thumbs:
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: SdK on November 04, 2016, 01:47:40 PM
True story. SdK was born in Colorado Springs. SdK wore his starter jacket to KSU games. KSU beat CU for the first time in a while. SdK cried. SdK became a wildwildstatecat fan after the tears were gone.
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: pissclams on November 04, 2016, 01:48:00 PM
For some strange reason, I am enjoying Colorado being decent again. NU and MU I want to lose every week, I don't really care about aTm, but CU I find myself cheering for, despite all the snarkiness towards Snyder and JUCOs, etc. back in the day.

i was watching them last night thinking they might be my favorite non-cats school now. there's nothing to dislike about them. also this:

https://twitter.com/TailgateHeisman/status/794359834737016832

There is a huge ton to dislike about them. This might be an age and geography issue. I hate them a million times more than I hate Mizzou and KU.

i just assumed that he was goemawing but ya
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: kso_FAN on November 04, 2016, 01:54:06 PM
I get all that there is to dislike about Colorado from the past, but I guess I'm over it now. I can't say the same for NU and MU.
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: Katpappy on November 04, 2016, 01:58:11 PM
I get all that there is to dislike about Colorado from the past, but I guess I'm over it now. I can't say the same for NU and MU.
I dislike them because of the shithead for a coach they had years ago.  Also talked crap on LHCBS and the Cats.
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: pissclams on November 04, 2016, 02:20:33 PM
I mean, they wrote the script for Baylor but I guess these young bucks don't know, don't show, or just don't care about what's going on in the hood
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: Skipper44 on November 04, 2016, 11:32:23 PM
I get all that there is to dislike about Colorado from the past, but I guess I'm over it now. I can't say the same for NU and MU.
did you ever go to a game in Boulder?  It made it easy to hate them.
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: kso_FAN on November 04, 2016, 11:39:44 PM
I get all that there is to dislike about Colorado from the past, but I guess I'm over it now. I can't say the same for NU and MU.
did you ever go to a game in Boulder?  It made it easy to hate them.

Yes, their fans were awful.
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: Skipper44 on November 04, 2016, 11:55:59 PM
Yeah, 3 trips and never an actual normal interaction.  It is a great stadium/setting tho
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: MakeItRain on November 05, 2016, 12:03:25 AM
I guess these young bucks don't know, don't show, or just don't care about what's going on in the hood

:love: this gets my vote for best movie reference ever on gE
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: IPA4Me on November 05, 2016, 11:24:12 AM
Louisville and Lamar Jackson laying it hard to BC.

Miss St with early lead trying to help Louisville get in the championship conversation.
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: michigancat on November 05, 2016, 12:33:41 PM
holy crap Texas :lol:
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: IPA4Me on November 05, 2016, 12:44:29 PM
Strip Six!
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: IPA4Me on November 05, 2016, 02:23:55 PM
Aggies go down!
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) on November 05, 2016, 03:52:40 PM
Baylor TCU knotted up at 7 after 57 seconds. :lol:
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: BackPayne on November 05, 2016, 04:07:37 PM
Baylor... :ROFL:
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: Trim on November 06, 2016, 01:14:03 AM
@chingon

https://twitter.com/KJMSingleton/status/795057563314384896
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: pissclams on November 10, 2016, 09:45:11 PM
duke - unc, what a game
duke's helmets look great
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: Tobias on November 10, 2016, 11:17:27 PM
the utes' helmets are def my favorite of whatever that style is called
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: ednksu on November 12, 2016, 01:29:00 PM
Baylor's QB just got 'sgetti legged.
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) on November 12, 2016, 01:55:24 PM
Three 11am Big12 games?  :flush:
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: ednksu on November 12, 2016, 02:24:47 PM
http://www.usatoday.com/story/sports/ncaaf/2016/11/12/baylor-qb-seth-russell-leg-injury-oklahoma-sooners/93721498/

embedded tweet has images of the lower leg hernia. 
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: cDubya on November 12, 2016, 03:02:37 PM
Whew...  :whornsdown:
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: Tobias on November 12, 2016, 03:04:30 PM
man holgo went crazy on that timeout deal
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: cDubya on November 12, 2016, 03:53:25 PM
man holgo went crazy on that timeout deal

Yeah, man. That was intense, even for him.
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: cfbandyman on November 12, 2016, 04:23:13 PM
This Clemson-Pitt game, just about to go to HT but  :eek:
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: HELLHAMMER on November 12, 2016, 06:21:22 PM
I'm convinced that Mike Gundy does huge amounts of cocaine drugs.  Look at those addict eyes.
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: Cire on November 12, 2016, 06:31:55 PM
Hopefully brent was distracted because he's coming


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: Skipper44 on November 12, 2016, 06:39:44 PM
Big step to eliminating the cfp as a reason to say no
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: scottwildcat on November 12, 2016, 07:33:59 PM
Clemson still wins the acc and gets in.
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) on November 12, 2016, 09:42:43 PM
Anyone bitching about Ertz should tune in to Iowa Mich. The two QBs have like 130 yards combined passing through 3 quarters. Woof city
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: Skipper44 on November 12, 2016, 10:36:13 PM
Helluva dogpile by Iowa there
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: MakeItRain on November 12, 2016, 10:41:15 PM
All of these upsets ended right after the other today, fun television watching; perfect off week for the Cats.
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: IPA4Me on November 17, 2016, 08:21:09 PM
Louisville! WTF?
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: 420seriouscat69 on November 17, 2016, 08:24:04 PM
Houston came out this week saying they're 100% healthy since the OU game. If that's the case, makes sense.
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: IPA4Me on November 17, 2016, 08:24:58 PM
HOLY crap!
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: IPA4Me on November 17, 2016, 08:25:31 PM
UL playing some Cats defense on that TD.
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: 420seriouscat69 on November 17, 2016, 08:28:48 PM
Our D is way better
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: Katpappy on November 17, 2016, 08:32:46 PM
eff Bobby and Tom, I want some of that cooking from Major Applewhite.  Could you imagine BV with the Major at OC for us!!!  (https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2FgoEMAW.com%2Fforum%2FSmileys%2FgoEMAW%2FWoohoo.gif&hash=c3f84f47abc7b5cde4272ac98d57ab0838bdb64d)

P.S.  One of my favorite QB's in the Big XII when he was at Texas.
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: Katpappy on November 17, 2016, 08:34:36 PM
Also was MacK's OC up till his last year at Texas.
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: Skipper44 on November 17, 2016, 08:51:34 PM
Katdaddy, do you know why Major left UT?
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: Katpappy on November 17, 2016, 09:22:23 PM
No more daddy Mack to take care of him. (https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2FgoEMAW.com%2Fforum%2FSmileys%2FgoEMAW%2FDunno.gif&hash=96a748f69e592eb38bc8028c226f18a552696f3a)
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: joda on November 18, 2016, 12:22:24 AM
No more daddy Mack to take care of him make him jump jump (https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2FgoEMAW.com%2Fforum%2FSmileys%2FgoEMAW%2FDunno.gif&hash=96a748f69e592eb38bc8028c226f18a552696f3a)
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: MakeItRain on November 18, 2016, 01:46:59 AM
No more daddy Mack to take care of him make him jump jump (https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2FgoEMAW.com%2Fforum%2FSmileys%2FgoEMAW%2FDunno.gif&hash=96a748f69e592eb38bc8028c226f18a552696f3a)

 :)
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: sys on November 19, 2016, 02:50:28 PM
which is the better game to invest time in:  the ku game, the isu game or the colorado game?
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: star seed 7 on November 19, 2016, 02:54:54 PM
https://twitter.com/nojessicaglows/status/800067010373832705
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: wetwillie on November 19, 2016, 03:25:00 PM
Butters got some more weiners out converts
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: sys on November 19, 2016, 03:41:52 PM
iowa state is proving themselves to be a superior football team as compared to texas tech's football team.  i may have to rechoose games if the poles don't reverse fairly soon.
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: BackPayne on November 19, 2016, 03:42:31 PM
Will Kliff be back at TTU next year?
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: kso_FAN on November 19, 2016, 03:45:11 PM
Will Kliff be back at TTU next year?

This might do it.
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: star seed 7 on November 19, 2016, 03:46:52 PM
Buyout is too high and tech is ku poor
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: sys on November 19, 2016, 03:59:25 PM
so the ku-tech game turns out to be the closer game.  this is why you either play or watch the games, folks.
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: catastrophe on November 19, 2016, 04:02:16 PM
That ISU-Tech score is pretty LOL right now.
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: catastrophe on November 19, 2016, 04:03:08 PM
I think ISU wants to prove how big of a lead they can blow.
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: BMWWcat on November 19, 2016, 04:13:27 PM
What is the KK buyout amount? Snyder can piss me off sometimes but I always thought thought KK is too much style over substance.
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: star seed 7 on November 19, 2016, 04:15:12 PM
like 8 mil after at the end of the season or something
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: MakeItRain on November 19, 2016, 05:43:17 PM
What is the KK buyout amount? Snyder can piss me off sometimes but I always thought thought KK is too much style over substance.

Why, because he's a good looking guy? He can just be not ready to be a Power 5 coach, I'm not sure he's sacrificing "substance."
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: Shooter Jones on November 19, 2016, 06:01:56 PM
Fox, stop showing the CU Boulder student section, please Seriously the ugliest group of kids imaginable.
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: Shooter Jones on November 19, 2016, 06:43:21 PM
Guys, clemson game.. Just look up top the whole time while theyre on defense. It's so damn hott
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: kso_FAN on November 19, 2016, 06:43:49 PM
So is this the highlight of Chattanooga football history?
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: MadCat on November 19, 2016, 06:55:28 PM
Just noticed Iowa State beat TTech by 56 puts.  :eek:
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: WildcatPower on November 19, 2016, 06:56:04 PM
Just noticed Iowa State beat TTech by 56 puts.  :eek:

Things I did not see coming in 2016.

Can also add the KU win over Texas as well.
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: Super PurpleCat on November 19, 2016, 06:56:42 PM
The North shall rise again.   :Carl: :Carl:
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: MakeItRain on November 19, 2016, 07:51:14 PM
Is David Boren the only UP to put himself in the university promo ad? I can't think of another one, certainly not in the Big 12.
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: MadCat on November 19, 2016, 08:40:41 PM
Is David Boren the only UP to put himself in the university promo ad? I can't think of another one, certainly not in the Big 12.

Oklahoma State's is in theirs.

Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: Big Sam on November 23, 2016, 11:00:28 PM
Well, this might be a "positive" story for Baylor athletics...at least there is no rape.  http://www.breitbart.com/sports/2016/11/23/baylors-associate-athletic-director-allegedly-choked-reporter/ (http://www.breitbart.com/sports/2016/11/23/baylors-associate-athletic-director-allegedly-choked-reporter/)
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: ednksu on November 23, 2016, 11:19:00 PM
Well, this might be a "positive" story for Baylor athletics...at least there is no rape.  http://www.breitbart.com/sports/2016/11/23/baylors-associate-athletic-director-allegedly-choked-reporter/ (http://www.breitbart.com/sports/2016/11/23/baylors-associate-athletic-director-allegedly-choked-reporter/)

crap news source, but I imagine they probably were broken up before unwelcome coitus in the locker room.
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: sys on November 25, 2016, 03:49:24 PM
nebraska, a state located north of kansas, is losing at football and texas is trying to defeat well-known kansan, g. patterson.  all while former temporary kansan, bob huggins, has a team coming back from 8 million down.  there's a lot going on.
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: sys on November 26, 2016, 03:51:28 PM
i'm not seeing a lot from the vaunted auburn running game.  maybe they're trying to overpass under the pressure of the big game.
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: CHONGS on November 26, 2016, 03:53:00 PM
i'm not seeing a lot from the vaunted auburn running game.  maybe they're trying to overpass under the pressure of the big game.
I thought their starting qb was going to play.  He helps keeps other teams honest.
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: sys on November 26, 2016, 03:55:03 PM
a good running team doesn't need a quarterback to keep a defense honest, chingon.  that's a poor excuse.
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: CHONGS on November 26, 2016, 03:56:13 PM
I know :(
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: Skipper44 on November 26, 2016, 03:57:19 PM
a good running team doesn't need a quarterback to keep a defense honest, chingon.  that's a poor excuse.
they do against Saban when he has this kind of front 7
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: CHONGS on November 26, 2016, 03:58:18 PM
Pettway isn't healthy either, but still....
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: mocat on November 26, 2016, 04:01:19 PM
Vaunted is way up there with artisan on my list of vomit inducing words
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: sys on November 26, 2016, 04:03:09 PM
that was a good job of keeping them honest.
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: sys on November 26, 2016, 04:04:04 PM
why are the switching quarterbacks around?
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: CHONGS on November 26, 2016, 04:04:35 PM
Vaunted is way up there with artisan on my list of vomit inducing words
How about 'craft'?
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: CHONGS on November 26, 2016, 04:05:15 PM
why are the switching quarterbacks around?
Starter is hurt.  They are KSU like having shaky backups.
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: sys on November 26, 2016, 04:08:28 PM
they should put in their third best running back or fastest wide receiver at quarterback.
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: CHONGS on November 26, 2016, 04:10:56 PM
they should put in their third best running back or fastest wide receiver at quarterback.
That would be John Franklin III then.
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: CHONGS on November 26, 2016, 06:02:08 PM
Poor auburn... Saban is a beast.
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: sys on November 26, 2016, 06:12:09 PM
the auburn running attack is overvaunted.
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: Tobias on November 26, 2016, 06:12:37 PM
i want the utes to destroy colorado
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: CHONGS on November 26, 2016, 06:14:26 PM
Sooooo... OSU in the playoffs? I think they probably should be.
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: star seed 7 on November 26, 2016, 06:38:38 PM
It will be great for the playoff people to admit all that win your conference stuff is bullshit
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: Reggie Singlegur on November 26, 2016, 07:34:35 PM
Assuming Wash, Clemson and Penn St win championship games, who gets left out along with the champion of the big 12 to get Ohio state in the playoff?
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: star seed 7 on December 02, 2016, 09:24:17 PM
these colorado snowman uniforms are  :Jeffy:
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: MakeItRain on December 02, 2016, 10:45:01 PM
OMG, Washington wide receiver just had a  :horrorsurprise: touchdown catch and run
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: wetwillie on December 02, 2016, 10:46:34 PM
did you see that near TD return fumblerooski?!
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: MakeItRain on December 02, 2016, 10:47:26 PM
did you see that near TD return fumblerooski?!

That was insane
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: Katpappy on December 03, 2016, 12:44:56 PM
Cows being stampeded by a Boomer Sooner.
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: Katpappy on December 03, 2016, 02:50:59 PM
Boomer Sooners are a thirsty bunch... milk cows. (https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2FgoEMAW.com%2Fforum%2FSmileys%2FgoEMAW%2FROFL.gif&hash=6bba8807037f47549325f7bacc2721aa5071ac45)
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: Katpappy on December 03, 2016, 03:10:20 PM
Boomer Sooner, FOX says 1st time undefeated in conference since Bix XII formed.  WOW!!! (https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2FgoEMAW.com%2Fforum%2FSmileys%2FgoEMAW%2FWha...gif&hash=fdc4ced30f0e4b0c31706079ecfd0389582a0a04)
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: everyone shut up on December 03, 2016, 03:20:45 PM
how did we not beat WVU?
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: Prince McJunkins on December 03, 2016, 03:25:50 PM
Does OU have a shot if VT upsets Clemson or would another Big 10 team get in?
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: Bookcat on December 03, 2016, 03:39:01 PM
how did we not beat WVU?

missed fg.  coaches had no clue who to rely on in short yardage. arguably still dont
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: wetwillie on December 03, 2016, 04:19:13 PM
Does OU have a shot if VT upsets Clemson or would another Big 10 team get in?

I don't think any scenario exists that would get OU into the playoff
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: Skipper44 on December 03, 2016, 06:00:10 PM
Yeah :/
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: star seed 7 on December 03, 2016, 06:02:06 PM
Good, eff ou
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: star seed 7 on December 03, 2016, 06:04:57 PM
eff Baylor but big 12 refs should be executed
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: star seed 7 on December 03, 2016, 06:17:06 PM
Jfc
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: ednksu on December 03, 2016, 06:17:39 PM
Wtf is the deal with that forward pass?  If it's a fumble, can't someone on the offense still toss 1 forward pass?
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: cDubya on December 03, 2016, 06:46:04 PM
Well, that was interesting...
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: wetwillie on December 03, 2016, 10:57:19 PM
No way the committee allows Penn State in the playoff right?
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: MakeItRain on December 03, 2016, 11:13:11 PM
No way the committee allows Penn State in the playoff right?

LOL, no, not unless Michigan and Ohio State are also getting in. What the hell was Herbstreit doing there? I'm glad Fowler aggressively mushed him.

I kind of hope either Washington or Clemson gets left out though just to see how batshit crazy people get. The quicker we can get to eight the better.
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: CHONGS on December 03, 2016, 11:19:50 PM
I flip flop back and forth.  I think OSU is probably the better team, but winning your conference should mean something.   Otherwise why have them?
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: catastrophe on December 03, 2016, 11:32:09 PM
If there is one thing I've learned about the CFP, it's that the committee will somehow justify putting Ohio State in the playoff no matter what.
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: Skipper44 on December 03, 2016, 11:37:37 PM
I flip flop back and forth.  I think OSU is probably the better team, but winning your game should mean something.   Otherwise why have them?
i think if it wasn't Pedo State this would be a bigger deal but who wants to defend them?
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: CHONGS on December 03, 2016, 11:54:27 PM
I think that's part of it too for me.  Penn State basically showed you  can get away with it. 
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: catastrophe on December 03, 2016, 11:59:04 PM
GMAFB. Everyone actually involved in the coverup should be in jail, but after that, I don't see any reason to somehow hold the football program to a higher standard.
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: MakeItRain on December 04, 2016, 12:03:30 AM
ESPN making a big deal about Baker Mayfield coming back is hilarious. Where exactly was that midget system qb going to go? Something pro other than sports?
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: DQ12 on December 04, 2016, 12:43:48 AM
Penn State lost 2 games.  uw, osu and clemson all have 1 loss.  that's where the argument pretty much starts and ends for me.

this is just a weird year where the champion of probably the best conference had 2 losses.  congrats on winning the big ten, penn state.  that's quite an achievement and cause for celebration.  unfortunately for PSU, the out of conference games count too.

the two loss team should always get left out when compared to p5 teams with fewer losses.
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: catastrophe on December 04, 2016, 12:52:42 AM
Penn State lost 2 games.  uw, osu and clemson all have 1 loss.  that's where the argument pretty much starts and ends for me.

this is just a weird year where the champion of probably the best conference had 2 losses.  congrats on winning the big ten, penn state.  that's quite an achievement and cause for celebration.  unfortunately for PSU, the out of conference games count too.

the two loss team should always get left out when compared to p5 teams with fewer losses.

The problem is the committee pretty much used the opposite reasoning to put Ohio State in the playoff a couple years ago.
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: DQ12 on December 04, 2016, 01:09:05 AM
Penn State lost 2 games.  uw, osu and clemson all have 1 loss.  that's where the argument pretty much starts and ends for me.

this is just a weird year where the champion of probably the best conference had 2 losses.  congrats on winning the big ten, penn state.  that's quite an achievement and cause for celebration.  unfortunately for PSU, the out of conference games count too.

the two loss team should always get left out when compared to p5 teams with fewer losses.

The problem is the committee pretty much used the opposite reasoning to put Ohio State in the playoff a couple years ago.
i don't have a problem with a conference championship being considered a tiebreaker of sorts for teams with the same number of losses.  i think SOS should be the tiebreaker, but whatever.

but i don't think, under any circumstance, a team with more losses should get in over a team with fewer losses.  that's like rule number 1 of college football:  whoever loses the least gets rewarded.
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: OK_Cat on December 04, 2016, 01:39:29 AM
Conference championship games mean nothing at this point


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: DQ12 on December 04, 2016, 01:54:39 AM
Conference championship games mean nothing at this point


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
They mean as much as any other game.  And they means as much as they ever have:  It's an achievement in and of itself and an opportunity to boost your SOS.

But I don't think it makes any sense to make conference championships a requirement.  They were never a requirement for going to the national championship ('01 Nebraska, '03 OU).

Putting PSU in wouldn't make any sense.  They lost more.  End of story.  Grats on your conference championship.
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: SkinnyBenny on December 04, 2016, 05:52:31 AM
Conference championship games mean nothing at this point


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
They mean as much as any other game.  And they means as much as they ever have:  It's an achievement in and of itself and an opportunity to boost your SOS.

But I don't think it makes any sense to make conference championships a requirement.  They were never a requirement for going to the national championship ('01 Nebraska, '03 OU).

Putting PSU in wouldn't make any sense.  They lost more.  End of story.  Grats on your conference championship.

It certainly was a requirement for Baylor and TCU in 2014. The committee has shown (and is about to show again) that conference championships matter, but only if the team that wins it is a big name team they want in the playoff.
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: pissclams on December 04, 2016, 08:42:31 AM
the best 4 teams in the country according to the clamsometer are bama, osu, ou, clem

i don't care about records, the goal is to get the best teams in the playoffs and the clamsometer cuts through the bullshit
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: wetwillie on December 04, 2016, 09:55:25 AM
Penn State lost 2 games.  uw, osu and clemson all have 1 loss.  that's where the argument pretty much starts and ends for me.

this is just a weird year where the champion of probably the best conference had 2 losses.  congrats on winning the big ten, penn state.  that's quite an achievement and cause for celebration.  unfortunately for PSU, the out of conference games count too.

the two loss team should always get left out when compared to p5 teams with fewer losses.

The problem is the committee pretty much used the opposite reasoning to put Ohio State in the playoff a couple years ago.
i don't have a problem with a conference championship being considered a tiebreaker of sorts for teams with the same number of losses.  i think SOS should be the tiebreaker, but whatever.

but i don't think, under any circumstance, a team with more losses should get in over a team with fewer losses.  that's like rule number 1 of college football:  whoever loses the least gets rewarded.

Western Michigan has 0 losses. 
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: DQ12 on December 04, 2016, 11:21:29 AM
Conference championship games mean nothing at this point


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
They mean as much as any other game.  And they means as much as they ever have:  It's an achievement in and of itself and an opportunity to boost your SOS.

But I don't think it makes any sense to make conference championships a requirement.  They were never a requirement for going to the national championship ('01 Nebraska, '03 OU).

Putting PSU in wouldn't make any sense.  They lost more.  End of story.  Grats on your conference championship.

It certainly was a requirement for Baylor and TCU in 2014. The committee has shown (and is about to show again) that conference championships matter, but only if the team that wins it is a big name team they want in the playoff.
It was a tiebreaker of sorts between teams with the same number of losses.  I don't think we even need to reach the discussion this year.  If you have teams (with passable schedules) with the same number of losses, then you can start looking at all the other crap. 

Western Michigan has 0 losses. 

the two loss team should always get left out when compared to p5 teams with fewer losses.
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: That_Guy on December 04, 2016, 11:30:45 AM
Feel like Conference championships have to matter. If you get in without one, it's complete bullshit. If a team is good enough to get into the playoffs, they should be good enough to win their rough ridin' conference. If not, then that's their own fault for sucking ass and not getting the job done when they should have.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: DQ12 on December 04, 2016, 11:42:53 AM
Feel like Conference championships have to matter. If you get in without one, it's complete bullshit. If a team is good enough to get into the playoffs, they should be good enough to win their rough ridin' conference. If not, then that's their own fault for sucking ass and not getting the job done when they should have.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Well then make it a rule that the CFP takes the 4 best conference champions.  But prioritizing conference records before actual overall records is just crazy to me.
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: Trim on December 04, 2016, 11:46:11 AM
pmshead has a washington hoodie.
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: cfbandyman on December 04, 2016, 11:47:24 AM
This year pretty mich shows why an 8 team playoff would make everyone happy. Conference champs in Bama, Penn St, Clemson, OU, Washington. tOSU and Michigan at larges and Western Michigan top non p5

Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: chum1 on December 04, 2016, 12:15:47 PM
I'm satisfied. eff Penn State. Not because of the scandal. Just because eff them, they suck.
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: OK_Cat on December 04, 2016, 01:57:33 PM
Lost in all of the playoff drama is that the K-State coaching tree won 2 conference championships yesterday.

Truly America's team :love:


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: Joker on December 04, 2016, 04:02:17 PM
Non-con SOS only matters to teams outside the P5.  You're better off scheduling garbage and then winning your conference championship like Washington.

If OU had done this instead of playing Houston and tOSU they'd be undefeated with the 2 seed.
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: CHONGS on December 04, 2016, 04:53:31 PM
No
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: CHONGS on December 04, 2016, 04:55:47 PM
I hope they'd be rightfully left out.  The Big 12 is piss poor. 
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: Joker on December 04, 2016, 04:56:55 PM
I hope they'd be rightfully left out.  The Big 12 is piss poor.

No way OU at 12-0 and ranked #2 in the country would be left out.
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: CHONGS on December 04, 2016, 04:57:48 PM
They wouldn't be #2.
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: Joker on December 04, 2016, 04:59:54 PM
They wouldn't be #2.

They started the season at #3.
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: CHONGS on December 04, 2016, 05:00:18 PM
Beating only two goodish teams shouldn't get you into the playoffs. I mean my God have some respect for the sport and the fans.
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: CHONGS on December 04, 2016, 05:01:02 PM
They wouldn't be #2.

They started the season at #3.
Oh is the AP deciding playoff spots this year?
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: Joker on December 04, 2016, 05:04:05 PM
Not saying it should.  But given the current system, it would take a pretty special scenario for the committee to leave out an undefeated OU.
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: Joker on December 04, 2016, 05:07:57 PM
They wouldn't be #2.

They started the season at #3.
Oh is the AP deciding playoff spots this year?

No denying the AP has some influence.  Perception still counts with the committee. 
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: CHONGS on December 04, 2016, 05:10:48 PM
You should email Currie that our national championship run is in jeopardy next year.  We need to drop that Vanderbilt game and schedule a 48-0 snoozer of a home game against FAU or someone. 
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: Joker on December 04, 2016, 05:18:45 PM
You should email Currie that our national championship run is in jeopardy next year.  We need to drop that Vanderbilt game and schedule a 48-0 snoozer of a home game against FAU or someone.

I get the argument for playing tougher games in the non-con from a consumption standpoint.  Are they more enjoyable to watch and more satisfying when you win?  Absolutely.  But given the current system, I would rather put myself in position to enjoy those games at the end of the season rather than the beginning.
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: Rage Against the McKee on December 04, 2016, 06:11:50 PM
I don't think you should necessarily have to win your conference to get into the playoffs, but I do think you should not be eligible if your own conference's champ isn't good enough to get in.
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: wetwillie on December 04, 2016, 06:12:16 PM
OU's mistake was scheduling Houston.  Playing OSU is/was a great decision.
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: MakeItRain on December 10, 2016, 05:49:53 PM
Army Navy is the best rivalry in college sports, no doubt about it. What an awesome game as it always is. When do you ever see the field rushed during a neutral field game?
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: kso_FAN on December 10, 2016, 05:51:03 PM
Army Navy is the best rivalry in college sports, no doubt about it. What an awesome game as it always is. When do you ever see the field rushed during a neutral field game?

Agree. That was a fun game to watch. And Verne.  :cry:
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) on December 10, 2016, 06:01:14 PM
Classic atmosphere, good times. I've been watching more and more the last several years as each team started getting good.
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: Dr Rick Daris on December 10, 2016, 08:05:53 PM
Great game. Suck it squids.
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: bubbles4ksu on December 10, 2016, 08:51:42 PM
army is so dumb and i just love them so much.
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: hemmy on December 11, 2016, 09:33:57 AM
A better system would be to re-introduce computers into the process, and keep the playoff.
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: wetwillie on December 11, 2016, 09:54:34 AM
A better system would be to re-introduce computers into the process, and keep the playoff.

sure if you want the chinese and russians to influence the college football playoff too
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: SdK on December 11, 2016, 10:04:00 AM
Why just expand the playoffs to 8? How many are in rhe NFL playoffs? They only have like 30 teams.
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: Katpappy on December 11, 2016, 10:27:40 AM
Why just expand the playoffs to 8? How many are in rhe NFL playoffs? They only have like 30 teams.
That's only because they are about entertainment and money, while college is about athletics.
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: MakeItRain on December 11, 2016, 10:38:44 AM
why, guys?
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: cDubya on December 12, 2016, 04:00:41 PM
Great game. Suck it squids.

 :dubious:  :shakesfist:
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: MakeItRain on December 13, 2016, 05:00:34 PM
WHAT IN THE WORLD?????????
http://sports.yahoo.com/news/wake-forest-radio-announcer-fired-after-school-concludes-he-gave-opponents-info-224238409.html

Wake Forest radio announcer Tommy Elrod has been fired after the school said an investigation found he had been giving Wake Forest opponents information about the Demon Deacons since 2014.

Wake Forest coach Dave Clawson said after a Nov. 12 loss to Louisville that there was a “game-plan breach” the school was investigating. Wake Forest led the Cardinals 12-0 before giving up 44-straight points.

The school said in a statement Tuesday that Elrod, the team’s radio analyst “provided or attempted to provide confidential and proprietary game preparations on multiple occasions starting in 2014.” The statement said Elrod was acting on his own and Louisville coach Bobby Petrino said after Clawson’s remarks that he had “no knowledge” of the situation.

Elrod was fired by team radio partner IMG and his bio is already deleted from the Wake Forest site.

“I am extremely disappointed that our confidential and proprietary game preparation was compromised,” Clawson said. “It’s incomprehensible that a former Wake Forest student-athlete, graduate assistant, full-time football coach and current radio analyst for the school would betray his alma mater. We allowed him to have full access to our players, team functions, film room and practices. He violated our trust which negatively impacted our entire program.

Elrod became a part of the team’s radio broadcasts in 2014 after he wasn’t retained by Clawson as a member of the team’s coaching staff. Elrod, who started as a graduate assistant, had been on the coaching staff for 11 seasons. Perhaps he was bitter about being removed from the coaching staff.

Wake Forest finished the season 6-6 after losing its final three games. The Deacons will play Temple in the Military Bowl on Dec. 27.

“I’m deeply disappointed that [Elrod] would act against Wake Forest, our football team and our fans in such a manner by compromising confidential game preparation information,” athletic director Ron Wellman said. “It is a relief that the team can move forward without his actions further undermining the positive strides Dave Clawson, his staff and the team have made.”
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: Tobias on December 13, 2016, 05:04:20 PM
tainted by being around radio people
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: star seed 7 on December 13, 2016, 05:08:27 PM
Weird af. Not at all surprised petrino is connected tho.
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: wetwillie on December 13, 2016, 06:08:18 PM
Quote
Wake Forest coach Dave Clawson said after a Nov. 12 loss to Louisville that there was a “game-plan breach” the school was investigating. Wake Forest led the Cardinals 12-0 before giving up 44-straight points.


This is oscar Weber level excuse making.
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: TheHamburglar on December 13, 2016, 09:38:22 PM
Quote
Wake Forest coach Dave Clawson said after a Nov. 12 loss to Louisville that there was a “game-plan breach” the school was investigating. Wake Forest led the Cardinals 12-0 before giving up 44-straight points.


This is oscar Weber level excuse making.

Not really.  His complaint was actually real.
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: TheHamburglar on December 13, 2016, 09:41:41 PM
I get coaching is a cut throat industry, but I'm still surprised after 2.5 years not one person called Doeren and tipped him off.
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: Katpappy on December 13, 2016, 10:09:06 PM
Quote
Wake Forest coach Dave Clawson said after a Nov. 12 loss to Louisville that there was a “game-plan breach” the school was investigating. Wake Forest led the Cardinals 12-0 before giving up 44-straight points.


This is oscar Weber level excuse making.

Not really.  His complaint was actually real.
I wonder if Louisville will have to forfeit this game.  NCAA needs to put on their cape and swoop in.
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: TheHamburglar on December 13, 2016, 10:58:20 PM
http://www.si.com/college-football/2016/12/13/wake-forest-game-plan-leak-louisville-bobby-petrino (http://www.si.com/college-football/2016/12/13/wake-forest-game-plan-leak-louisville-bobby-petrino)

"When Elrod coached at Wake Forest, he was co-coordinator of the passing game. His other co-coordinator, Lonnie Galloway, now works on Petrino’s staff."
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: DQ12 on December 14, 2016, 02:08:58 PM
i'd be interested in hearing the other side of this.  embarrassing for WF of course, but this makes Louisville look really, really bad too.
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: MakeItRain on December 14, 2016, 02:40:04 PM
i'd be interested in hearing the other side of this.  embarrassing for WF of course, but this makes Louisville look really, really bad too.

Because Louisville is the only other school being associated with this I'm going to guess that Elrod has been feeding Galloway the game plans then Petrino got wind of it and reported Elrod. We'll see if Galloway gets fired too but he can very easily plead that he just got the information from casual friendly conversations with Elrod instead of something more specific.
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: DQ12 on December 14, 2016, 02:43:22 PM
i'd be interested in hearing the other side of this.  embarrassing for WF of course, but this makes Louisville look really, really bad too.

Because Louisville is the only other school being associated with this I'm going to guess that Elrod has been feeding Galloway the game plans then Petrino got wind of it and reported Elrod. We'll see if Galloway gets fired too but he can very easily plead that he just got the information from casual friendly conversations with Elrod instead of something more specific.
Could be.  But Petrino isn't exactly known as Mr. #Ethics.  I imagine there'll be plenty of ink spilled on this.  Maybe BITB Jr. can make a name for himself digging deep into this sports story. 
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: MakeItRain on December 14, 2016, 02:49:24 PM
i'd be interested in hearing the other side of this.  embarrassing for WF of course, but this makes Louisville look really, really bad too.

Because Louisville is the only other school being associated with this I'm going to guess that Elrod has been feeding Galloway the game plans then Petrino got wind of it and reported Elrod. We'll see if Galloway gets fired too but he can very easily plead that he just got the information from casual friendly conversations with Elrod instead of something more specific.
Could be.  But Petrino isn't exactly known as Mr. #Ethics.  I imagine there'll be plenty of ink spilled on this.  Maybe BITB Jr. can make a name for himself digging deep into this sports story.

Was Elrod in a bike theft crime ring?
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: TheHamburglar on December 14, 2016, 02:51:21 PM
i'd be interested in hearing the other side of this.  embarrassing for WF of course, but this makes Louisville look really, really bad too.

Because Louisville is the only other school being associated with this I'm going to guess that Elrod has been feeding Galloway the game plans then Petrino got wind of it and reported Elrod. We'll see if Galloway gets fired too but he can very easily plead that he just got the information from casual friendly conversations with Elrod instead of something more specific.

Lousiville AD Jurich is saying Galloway passed it along to D coaches, but because Wake didn't use the plays then he's sorry this is a distraction for Louisville's bowl prep.

However, this is bullshit because Wake knew they had the plays before the game.  Most are reporting that Wake didn't run any of the plays because they knew Louisville had them.  Andrea Adleson is reporting Wake tested them with 1 play/formation and Louisville played it perfectly, so they knew Louisville planned for the plays and scrapped the rest.
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: Trim on December 14, 2016, 02:52:18 PM
Could be.  But Petrino isn't exactly known as Mr. #Ethics.  I imagine there'll be plenty of ink spilled on this.  Maybe BITB Jr. can make a name for himself digging deep into this sports story. 

Too late.  That bike has already pedaled to the desert.
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: cDubya on December 28, 2016, 09:49:04 AM
Mountaineers play at 5:30est. Im not even off work til 6-6:30.  :curse:
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: Gooch on December 28, 2016, 09:50:17 AM
Mountaineers play at 5:30est. Im not even off work til 6-6:30.  :curse:
Quit?
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: cDubya on December 28, 2016, 01:22:45 PM
Mountaineers play at 5:30est. Im not even off work til 6-6:30.  :curse:
Quit?

Strong possibility.
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: kslim on December 28, 2016, 01:26:25 PM
Mountaineers play at 5:30est. Im not even off work til 6-6:30.  :curse:
Quit?
drinks in the office?
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: ChiComCat on December 28, 2016, 01:28:34 PM
Wife/kids coming down with something that requires you to run by the pharmacy that closes at 5?
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: cDubya on December 28, 2016, 04:09:53 PM
Left early!!  :excited: :runaway:
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: kso_FAN on December 28, 2016, 04:16:49 PM
Left early!!  :excited: :runaway:

:cheers:
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: CHONGS on December 28, 2016, 04:19:42 PM
Left early!!  :excited: :runaway:
Good for you! 
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: Tobias on December 28, 2016, 04:44:33 PM
don't go in tomorrow either, eff those guys
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: cDubya on December 28, 2016, 04:57:20 PM
 
don't go in tomorrow either, eff those guys
:ROFL:

Depending on the outcome...
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: wetwillie on December 28, 2016, 04:58:22 PM
I'm rooting for your squad cdub.  EMAM!
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: cDubya on December 28, 2016, 05:19:55 PM
I'm rooting for your squad cdub.  EMAM!
  :emawkid:
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: cDubya on December 28, 2016, 05:47:27 PM
Serious old school Big East brawl going on.
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: mocat on December 28, 2016, 05:48:48 PM
LFG eers
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: cDubya on December 28, 2016, 05:50:34 PM
Defense cant keep destroying Miami for 4 q's. Gotta have some damn offense soon.
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: wetwillie on December 28, 2016, 06:02:39 PM
Looks like mark richt has put the icing on the cake al golden baked.
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: cDubya on December 28, 2016, 06:32:03 PM
 :drink: :drink: :drink:
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: star seed 7 on December 28, 2016, 06:49:22 PM
This conf is so trash this year
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: CHONGS on December 28, 2016, 06:52:15 PM
Yup
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: wetwillie on December 28, 2016, 06:54:06 PM
OU getting stomped by war eagle will hurt too
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: cDubya on December 28, 2016, 07:13:40 PM
Im booking a flight to KS. Gonna fight all of gE tonight.
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: BackPayne on December 28, 2016, 07:43:02 PM
Im booking a flight to KS. Gonna fight all of gE tonight.

My mom won't let you in the basement.
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: cDubya on December 28, 2016, 07:43:14 PM
Skyler Howard overthrew the Epcot Center
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: cDubya on December 28, 2016, 07:50:14 PM
Im sorry, guys.
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: kso_FAN on December 28, 2016, 07:51:35 PM
Im sorry, guys.

Sorry. You all had a good year, but its always disappointing to not play well in the bowl game.
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: BackPayne on December 28, 2016, 07:57:00 PM
Im sorry, guys.

Sorry. You all had a good year, but its always disappointing to not play well in the bowl game.

We are the best at this.
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: cDubya on December 28, 2016, 08:11:06 PM
I "gE" a lot, but i legitimately thought we'd handle Miami. I have no idea why i thought this other than the fact that I am  a diehard fan. Decades of disappointment be damned.
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: MadCat on December 29, 2016, 01:36:41 AM
When you thought your team beat the cats, they really just took the bowl baton.   :bartender:
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: renocat on December 29, 2016, 06:41:11 PM
Arkiehogs are sure whompin ugly on VCU Cadavers.
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: BackPayne on December 29, 2016, 07:24:57 PM
They're going to blow it again, aren't they?
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: EMAWzifried on December 29, 2016, 07:32:28 PM
The Hokies haven't proved they can move the ball if ShineAggie just stayed on the ground, ate clock and flipped the field with punts. Don't know why they insist on throwing.
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: CHONGS on December 29, 2016, 08:08:21 PM
Good ole fatbert
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: EMAWzifried on December 29, 2016, 08:18:01 PM
Good ole fatbert
Don't know how much more of this Arkie fans are going to take. Complete and total collapse.
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: The Big Train on December 29, 2016, 09:13:54 PM
some CU player just died on a block  :sdeek:
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: Trim on December 29, 2016, 09:17:11 PM
Auburn lady from finebaum show on with wazzu'rs to talk alabama-uw: http://sportsradiokjr.iheart.com/onair/ian-puck-show-21901/tammy-from-auburn-joins-the-show-15425431/
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: renocat on December 29, 2016, 10:29:44 PM
From the New Revised Razorbacm Bible:  "11There on the nearby hillside a large herd of pigs (razorbacks) was feeding. 12 So the demons (VA Fech) begged Jesus, “Send us to the pigs, so that we may enter them.” 13 He gave them permission, and the unclean spirits came out and went into the pigs (arkiehogs), and the herd of about two thousand rushed down to the sea and drowned."

Dang demons.
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: BackPayne on December 30, 2016, 02:19:44 PM
Dammit, Patterson!
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: catastrophe on December 30, 2016, 02:25:21 PM
TCU is a pretty bad team with a really bad QB. It would have been very embarrassing for Georgia to lose that one.
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: The Big Train on December 30, 2016, 10:35:43 PM
Holy crap
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: The Big Train on December 30, 2016, 10:40:26 PM
:Wha:
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: mocat on December 30, 2016, 10:43:28 PM
Pretty great ah-ringe bowl
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: The Big Train on December 30, 2016, 10:45:22 PM
Wow
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: The Big Train on December 30, 2016, 10:46:20 PM
What in the rough ridin' world!? :horrorsurprise:
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: Pete on December 30, 2016, 10:59:55 PM
Recap?
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: The Big Train on December 30, 2016, 11:07:42 PM
Recap?

With like 6 minutes left Michigan scored 15 points in 3 minutes to take the lead for the first time.  Florida state had a long kickoff return and scored to go up by 3.  Michigan blocked the PAT and returned it for 2 points to trail by one.  Then Florida St held on and won by 1.
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: ben ji on December 30, 2016, 11:11:03 PM
Recap?

With like 6 minutes left Michigan scored 15 points in 3 minutes to take the lead for the first time.  Florida state had a long kickoff return and scored to go up by 3.  Michigan blocked the PAT and returned it for 2 points to trail by one.  Then Florida St held on and won by 1.

And on that kickoff return the guy almost took a knee, panicked, took a quick look around then decided to return the kick. He ended up returning it 70 yards to give FSU great field position.

Amazing game. 
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: wetwillie on January 02, 2017, 09:15:02 AM
i hope to see many of you ITT today at noon CST to row the boat against a common enemy the Wisconsin Badgers.
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: Katpappy on January 02, 2017, 09:30:37 AM
i hope to see many of you ITT today at noon CST to row the boat against a common enemy the Wisconsin Badgers.
Will do, WW! (https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2FgoEMAW.com%2Fforum%2FSmileys%2FgoEMAW%2FBeer%2520Chug.gif&hash=f1aaab24bd1d387f83139d90346f4f4627ab5e08)
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: The Big Train on January 02, 2017, 10:02:32 AM
Wow! There are some good games on today! :Woot:
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: i poo crabs on January 02, 2017, 10:09:39 AM
go OU!
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: kso_FAN on January 02, 2017, 11:45:34 AM
Lane is done. Probably a good decision by Saban.
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: michigancat on January 02, 2017, 11:53:04 AM
Lane is done. Probably a good decision by Saban.

it's so bizarre. I mean Sarkasian is going to be calling the plays? I realize they have a lot of talent and Sark has a pretty good feel for Kiffin's system but that's just bonkers.
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: Dugout DickStone on January 02, 2017, 11:55:05 AM
Unless he was afraid of a Lane sabotage?
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: The Big Train on January 02, 2017, 12:08:34 PM
holy crap what a catch by that Wisky TE  :horrorsurprise:
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: KITNfury on January 02, 2017, 12:34:06 PM
Unless he was afraid of a Lane sabotage?
I would think Lane would want the ring
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: michigancat on January 02, 2017, 12:35:41 PM
Unless he was afraid of a Lane sabotage?

which would be pretty crazy on several levels
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: wetwillie on January 02, 2017, 12:37:40 PM
the boat is taking on water. 
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: kso_FAN on January 02, 2017, 01:00:42 PM
Unless he was afraid of a Lane sabotage?

I doubt think it went that far, but I don't think Saban felt Lane was 100% in. And probably to Saban, that's pretty much equal to sabotage.
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: DOD Take 2 on January 02, 2017, 01:29:50 PM
Unless he was afraid of a Lane sabotage?

I doubt think it went that far, but I don't think Saban felt Lane was 100% in. And probably to Saban, that's pretty much equal to sabotage.

McMurphy cited a source as saying late to meetings, made ass-chewing comment, etc. so yeah basically felt he wasn't 100% in
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: kso_FAN on January 02, 2017, 01:34:38 PM
I'm guessing Saban wasn't a big fan of this either: http://www.si.com/college-football/2016/12/28/lane-kiffin-alabama-usc-fau?xid=socialflow_twitter_si
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: Skipper44 on January 02, 2017, 01:37:17 PM
 The highlight of the Peach bowl was Saban losing his mind as they had multiple delay of game penalties.  Lane might of actually been fired at halftime.  Kiffin and Sark are Norm Chow disciples and prolly have a ton in common
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: wetwillie on January 02, 2017, 01:58:29 PM
the boat is taking on water. 

It appears to be self bailing though!
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: The Big Train on January 02, 2017, 01:59:43 PM
the boat is taking on water. 

It appears to be self bailing though!

Applied the flexseal and rowing again!
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: wetwillie on January 02, 2017, 02:11:02 PM
Wisconsin may have the ugliest fan base in America.  Wow.
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: Canary on January 02, 2017, 02:18:46 PM
I'm guessing Saban wasn't a big fan of this either: http://www.si.com/college-football/2016/12/28/lane-kiffin-alabama-usc-fau?xid=socialflow_twitter_si
Maybe it's part of the make up of a division 1 coach, but he seems very confident that he is "the guy" that makes things work wherever he is. 
He also appears pretty entitled.  Maybe that comes with his intelligence of the game too.  Don't know.
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: kim carnes on January 02, 2017, 02:21:35 PM
I'm guessing Saban wasn't a big fan of this either: http://www.si.com/college-football/2016/12/28/lane-kiffin-alabama-usc-fau?xid=socialflow_twitter_si

Classic lane  :love:
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: pissclams on January 02, 2017, 02:46:45 PM
I'm guessing Saban wasn't a big fan of this either: http://www.si.com/college-football/2016/12/28/lane-kiffin-alabama-usc-fau?xid=socialflow_twitter_si

yahtzee!
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: wetwillie on January 02, 2017, 02:54:27 PM
ROW THE DAMN BOAT!
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: DOD Take 2 on January 02, 2017, 03:07:22 PM
ROW THE DAMN BOAT!

Paul Chryst sounds like the fan you meet at a bar who is 7 beers deep
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: star seed 7 on January 02, 2017, 03:17:24 PM
Quote
he can play with this three kids—Landry, Pressley and Knox
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: Katpappy on January 02, 2017, 03:47:22 PM
I don't know how you all feel about the outcome of this game, but for me, I'm delighted.  This will keep PJ humble enough that if he can prove himself next year he'll make some P5 school a very good coach... and that could be us.  (https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2FgoEMAW.com%2Fforum%2FSmileys%2FgoEMAW%2FExcited.gif&hash=cca565f67d05cf5a4b6390a56cee9f95fccf1a34)
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: EMAWzifried on January 02, 2017, 04:33:02 PM
Trying to decide if the BDF Rose Bowl is worth a couple hours of my time. Not promising so far.
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: EMAWzifried on January 02, 2017, 06:41:43 PM
Keith Jackson is senile.
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: BostonPancake on January 02, 2017, 06:42:07 PM
The Kieth Jackson interview during the rose bowl was painful.  Good to hear his voice, but he has lost his mind a bit.   :cry:
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: CHONGS on January 02, 2017, 07:56:44 PM
Lets go auburn!
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: kso_FAN on January 02, 2017, 08:04:04 PM
The Kieth Jackson interview during the rose bowl was painful.  Good to hear his voice, but he has lost his mind a bit.   :cry:

He is 88. I bet even Bill will start to slip at 88.
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: treysolid on January 02, 2017, 08:29:22 PM
stoops is going to dick the big12 out of a winning bowl record
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: kim carnes on January 02, 2017, 08:39:33 PM
Joe Mixon is playing?  Lmao
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: michigancat on January 02, 2017, 08:50:37 PM
I've been watching the last two games in the skycam feed and it's very enjoyable.
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: ednksu on January 02, 2017, 10:55:18 PM
Man, I'm not sure how Oklahoma is barely hanging on with the physicality of Auburn.  I'm sure the XM radio announcers who said OU would take most of the game to adjust saw this coming.
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: ednksu on January 02, 2017, 11:10:01 PM
Did Mush just refer to the SEC as "our conference" when joking with Palmer about OU fans mocking the SEC chant?
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: Skipper44 on January 02, 2017, 11:22:09 PM
Brent & Jesse are the official SEC crew and I loved the tone of Brent's comment
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: cfbandyman on January 02, 2017, 11:34:30 PM
Glad OU didnt choke that game. 2-1 vs. SEC and 4-2 in bowls overall. Not too bad for once.
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: mocat on January 02, 2017, 11:37:24 PM
Big 10 got absolutely clowned this year
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: Missouriscribe on January 02, 2017, 11:59:05 PM
Kiffin is the Donald Trump Lemon of cfb
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: ChiComCat on January 03, 2017, 10:35:18 AM
Mahomes declared  :love:
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: MakeItRain on January 03, 2017, 01:24:54 PM
He's the best qb in the draft but the idiot media won't position him that way. Mitch Trubiski, LOL
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: MadCat on January 03, 2017, 03:39:19 PM
Baker Mayfield?  :crossfingers:
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: 'taterblast on January 03, 2017, 06:14:45 PM
will someone do this for YPP and PPP by conference?

https://twitter.com/Big12Conference/status/816436486295855105
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: BackPayne on January 03, 2017, 06:21:46 PM
Baker Mayfield?  :crossfingers:

Pretty sure he already announced he would be back for his senior year.  OU's going to be rediculously good.
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: DOD Take 2 on January 03, 2017, 07:45:46 PM
Baker Mayfield?  :crossfingers:

Pretty sure he already announced he would be back for his senior year.  OU's going to be rediculously good.

Well it'll be a rebuilt offense. Perine is already going pro. Can't see Mixon back either. Westbrook is gone too.
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: cfbandyman on January 03, 2017, 09:34:42 PM
Baker Mayfield?  :crossfingers:

Pretty sure he already announced he would be back for his senior year.  OU's going to be rediculously good.

Well it'll be a rebuilt offense. Perine is already going pro. Can't see Mixon back either. Westbrook is gone too.

Yeah, I mean they'll be good, but they lose a significant amount of production. Westbrook is probably the biggest loss.
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: kso_FAN on January 03, 2017, 11:36:32 PM
Baker Mayfield?  :crossfingers:

Pretty sure he already announced he would be back for his senior year.  OU's going to be rediculously good.

Well it'll be a rebuilt offense. Perine is already going pro. Can't see Mixon back either. Westbrook is gone too.

If Mayfield had any ability to get drafted, he should go.
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) on January 03, 2017, 11:46:53 PM
Baker Mayfield?  :crossfingers:

Pretty sure he already announced he would be back for his senior year.  OU's going to be rediculously good.

Pretty sude Baker Mayfield was a RS SR last season, must be on the gi bill or something.
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: MakeItRain on January 03, 2017, 11:48:28 PM
Baker Mayfield?  :crossfingers:

Pretty sure he already announced he would be back for his senior year.  OU's going to be rediculously good.

Well it'll be a rebuilt offense. Perine is already going pro. Can't see Mixon back either. Westbrook is gone too.

If Mayfield had any ability to get drafted, he should go.

Isn't he a fat midget?
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: kso_FAN on January 03, 2017, 11:49:48 PM
Yeah, I don't think he's NFL material. Just a great college QB.
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: cfbandyman on January 04, 2017, 07:49:16 AM
Baker Mayfield?  :crossfingers:

Pretty sure he already announced he would be back for his senior year.  OU's going to be rediculously good.

Well it'll be a rebuilt offense. Perine is already going pro. Can't see Mixon back either. Westbrook is gone too.

If Mayfield had any ability to get drafted, he should go.

Isn't he a fat midget?

I'm legit shocked he's 6' 1" (apparently). He looks way shorter on the field.

Yeah, I don't think he's NFL material. Just a great college QB.

Yup. I mean he can try at least.
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: MakeItRain on January 04, 2017, 10:11:13 AM
Baker Mayfield?  :crossfingers:

Pretty sure he already announced he would be back for his senior year.  OU's going to be rediculously good.

Well it'll be a rebuilt offense. Perine is already going pro. Can't see Mixon back either. Westbrook is gone too.

If Mayfield had any ability to get drafted, he should go.

Isn't he a fat midget?

I'm legit shocked he's 6' 1" (apparently). He looks way shorter on the field.

Yeah, I don't think he's NFL material. Just a great college QB.

Yup. I mean he can try at least.

That's one that gets measured at 5'11 5/8" at the combine.
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: bucket on January 04, 2017, 02:21:12 PM
Baker Mayfield?  :crossfingers:

Pretty sure he already announced he would be back for his senior year.  OU's going to be rediculously good.

Well it'll be a rebuilt offense. Perine is already going pro. Can't see Mixon back either. Westbrook is gone too.

Quote
Draft Insider Tony Pauline reports "general managers around the league have told those close to (Oklahoma junior RB Joe) Mixon he won’t get drafted" if he declares for the 2017 NFL Draft.

He'll be back
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) on January 04, 2017, 02:33:35 PM
Unless the Chiefs, Patriots and Raiders don't have draft picks, Mixon will absolutely get drafted.
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: DOD Take 2 on January 04, 2017, 02:48:30 PM
There might be heat on Mixon right now, but no way come April someone doesn't draft him. I'm sure it won't be early, but a guy with that talent will get drafted. Especially considering what Tyreek Hill has done and kept a low profile off the field since coming into the league. Besides, he doesn't necessarily sound welcome back in Norman. Didn't Stoops openly say he'd have been off the team if Stoops had to do it over?
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: MakeItRain on January 04, 2017, 03:29:30 PM
I have draftnics so much, of course Mixon.would get drafted, what the hell are we talking about. LOL at the thought of 30 different NFL front offices passing on a guy who punched a girl three years earlier. If that is the standard of behavior half of the league, including coaches and front office personnel would be looking for work.
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: Skipper44 on January 04, 2017, 03:32:58 PM
I agree but 30 NFL gms (or owners) all turned down Ray Rice's offer to donate his entire salary to domestic abuse charities. 
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: Rage Against the McKee on January 04, 2017, 03:41:36 PM
I agree but 30 NFL gms (or owners) all turned down Ray Rice's offer to donate his entire salary to domestic abuse charities.

I'm not sure how what Mixon did is any worse than what Tyreek Hill did.
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: DOD Take 2 on January 04, 2017, 05:12:43 PM
I agree but 30 NFL gms (or owners) all turned down Ray Rice's offer to donate his entire salary to domestic abuse charities.

I'm not sure how what Mixon did is any worse than what Tyreek Hill did.

Ray Rice was also a running back past his prime who would've made a marginal difference to any teams running game. Bad publicity wasn't worth the minor gain.
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: kim carnes on January 04, 2017, 06:34:13 PM
I have draftnics so much, of course Mixon.would get drafted, what the hell are we talking about. LOL at the thought of 30 different NFL front offices passing on a guy who punched a girl three years earlier. If that is the standard of behavior half of the league, including coaches and front office personnel would be looking for work.

This post is ridiculous
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: bucket on January 04, 2017, 09:29:42 PM
Tyreek wasn't captured on film assaulting a woman. That's, weirdly, a big deal for the NFL.
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: Gooch on January 05, 2017, 11:17:29 AM
If Ray Rice would have actually been able to help a team he would have been back in the NFL. Dude is like 85 in RB years and slow as crap.
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: kslim on January 05, 2017, 02:50:55 PM
I agree but 30 NFL gms (or owners) all turned down Ray Rice's offer to donate his entire salary to domestic abuse charities.

I'm not sure how what Mixon did is any worse than what Tyreek Hill did.
video.

and yes mixon will get drafted, but please (and im not a kc fan) dont compare the two, hill has at least kept his nose clean was kicked off his college team and went to juco while making things right going to counseling and not being a rough ridin' douche. mixon hit another girl (per sources) and tried to fight a meter maid, hell he only apologized because his coach made him.
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: ChiComCat on January 05, 2017, 03:23:27 PM
I agree but 30 NFL gms (or owners) all turned down Ray Rice's offer to donate his entire salary to domestic abuse charities.

I'm not sure how what Mixon did is any worse than what Tyreek Hill did.

It's on tape. 

Hill/Hardy got second chances because there was no tape.  Mixon/Rice got second chances before their tapes came out.

Reality TV makes for great moral outrage.
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: bucket on January 05, 2017, 06:02:26 PM
Quote
Oklahoma RB Joe Mixon will forego his final two years of eligibility and enter the NFL draft.
Mixon had a monster two years at Oklahoma, averaging an eye-popping 6.73 yards on his 301 career carries. That was, of course, after he was suspended the entire 2014 season for domestic violence, of which a shocking video was released last month. Mixon is an early-round talent who will probably go undrafted because of his troubled past.
Source: Adam Schefter on Twitter Jan 5 - 6:55 PM
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: MakeItRain on January 05, 2017, 06:36:22 PM
I just don't think there is any way he goes undrafted, that seems like a huge and unnecessary risk for so many talent starved teams. It's better for him to not get drafted, since he isn't going early, so he can pick his location. He clearly different from other undrafted free agents because he's going to get a contract.
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: bucket on January 05, 2017, 09:44:17 PM
(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fassets.nydailynews.com%2Fpolopoly_fs%2F1.2426115.1446837691%21%2Fimg%2FhttpImage%2Fimage.jpg_gen%2Fderivatives%2Farticle_750%2F492295106.jpg&hash=9eec4cc2825f81749702fc936cd6c220205ee496)

More talented than this guy?
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: ChiComCat on January 06, 2017, 09:11:55 AM
Greg Hardy got a second chance.  He is out of the league because his production tanked at the end of the season and he proved to be a sociopath. 
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: MakeItRain on January 06, 2017, 09:36:35 AM
Greg Hardy got a second chance.  He is out of the league because his production tanked at the end of the season and he proved to be a sociopath.

Yeah, he went to Dallas and was late to practices and meetings and had conflicts with players and coaches; not to mention he managed to embarrass the Cowboys more than once with public comments.
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: Powercat Posse on January 09, 2017, 07:19:29 PM
Clemson by 2. 

Eff Bama.
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: wetwillie on January 09, 2017, 07:22:46 PM
Saban mumped up firing kiffen
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) on January 09, 2017, 07:22:59 PM
Noticed bama had this guy on their coin toss team
(https://media3.giphy.com/media/jw7XSvU3hScOQ/200w_s.gif)
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: michigancat on January 09, 2017, 07:28:45 PM
finebaum not talking enough in the SEC film room. McElwain looks like he's about to tell Bill Brasky stories.
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: Dugout DickStone on January 09, 2017, 07:36:27 PM
Bama will win
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: wetwillie on January 09, 2017, 07:36:56 PM
Saban mumped up firing kiffen

:lol:
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: pvegs on January 09, 2017, 08:08:58 PM
i'd really enjoy seeing our run game against this bama front 7. i bet we could string together one 15 play 60 yard drive ending in a fg and a 41-3 loss.
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: kso_FAN on January 09, 2017, 08:09:17 PM
Bama's defense is ridiculous so far...

YPP   2.56
PPP   0.00
PPD   0.00
PPD<40   0.00
Succ%   16.7%
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: kso_FAN on January 09, 2017, 08:24:54 PM
Saban mumped up firing kiffen

YPP   6.74
PPP   0.61
PPD   2.80
PPD<40   7.00
Succ%   39.1%
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: sys on January 09, 2017, 08:29:11 PM
my espn isn't working.  it's annoying.
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: wetwillie on January 09, 2017, 08:29:28 PM
Saban mumped up firing kiffen

YPP   6.74
PPP   0.61
PPD   2.80
PPD<40   7.00
Succ%   39.1%



That's pretty good I think
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: Tobias on January 09, 2017, 08:30:14 PM
my espn isn't working.  it's annoying.

mines been pretty flaky on a very stable connection
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: kso_FAN on January 09, 2017, 08:36:12 PM
Saban mumped up firing kiffen

YPP   6.74
PPP   0.61
PPD   2.80
PPD<40   7.00
Succ%   39.1%



That's pretty good I think

Its not bad. Giving the ball to Scarborough is not hard though.

But Clemson seems to have a little fight, I don't know if their offense can do anything though.

Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: sys on January 09, 2017, 08:36:31 PM
mines been pretty flaky on a very stable connection

i gave up and opened an illegal stream.
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: Powercat Posse on January 09, 2017, 08:37:51 PM
Clemson got 12 on first play. 26 plays 60 yds since.  :facepalm:

Bama 4 big runs totaling 107 yds.

Now, finally a big play for Clemson
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: sys on January 09, 2017, 08:38:14 PM
i was hoping clemson would win, so if they don't start doing more winning i may stop watching anyways.
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: sys on January 09, 2017, 08:40:18 PM
ok, good.
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: Super PurpleCat on January 09, 2017, 08:55:52 PM
So this is going to be what, Alabama's 15th title in 10 years?  Man college football is fun these days.
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: kso_FAN on January 09, 2017, 09:03:51 PM
Good game.

Clemson Offense   
YPP   4.51
PPP   0.16
PPD   0.88
PPD<40   7.00
Succ%   28.9%


Bama Offense   
YPP   5.17
PPP   0.39
PPD   1.75
PPD<40   4.67
Succ%   33.3%
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: Powercat Posse on January 09, 2017, 09:07:32 PM
Clemson got 12 on first play. 26 plays 60 yds since.  :facepalm:

Bama 4 big runs totaling 107 yds.



awful 1.5 quarters from Clemson offense, which included a TO and a failed 4th down conversion. In a way, they have to feel good down 7

At the same time, Bama has 40 yds on 16 pass attempts. Those 4 long runs were killers.  If they could have held Bama to 2 long runs, this game might be tied....because Bama's other 17 runs have 36 yds.
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: john "teach me how to" dougie on January 09, 2017, 09:34:17 PM
So this is going to be what, Alabama's 15th title in 10 years?  Man college football is fun these days.

Don't be ridiculous. It's only #6.
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: sys on January 09, 2017, 09:37:18 PM
clemson should stop turning the ball over.
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: Powercat Posse on January 09, 2017, 10:04:25 PM
Clemson 2 TOs + TO on downs
Bama 0 TOs
And it's 17-14 with Bama punting

Eff Bama
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: kso_FAN on January 09, 2017, 10:05:06 PM
Saban mumped up firing kiffen

I'm starting to think you might be right now.

Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: BackPayne on January 09, 2017, 10:08:13 PM
Copter Watson
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: star seed 7 on January 09, 2017, 10:15:09 PM
Furk
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: kso_FAN on January 09, 2017, 10:17:29 PM
And then Sark calls bubble go to the TE. Nice.
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: sys on January 09, 2017, 10:18:46 PM
i didn't like it when they spun that young man around so violently.
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: Powercat Posse on January 09, 2017, 10:21:01 PM
And then Sark calls bubble go to the TE. Nice.

There were 2 Bama players on that side. 2 Clemson DBacks and a safety on the same side.

That's a HS bonehead mistake by that safety. Even if it's a quick throw, a Bama guy can only block 1 Clemson guy.  It wasn't even a pump fake....the idiot safety just did whatever he wanted (it's 3 vs 2 and you are a safety)
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: kso_FAN on January 09, 2017, 10:24:58 PM
And then Sark calls bubble go to the TE. Nice.

There were 2 Bama players on that side. 2 Clemson DBacks and a safety on the same side.

That's a HS bonehead mistake by that safety. Even if it's a quick throw, a Bama guy can only block 1 Clemson guy.  It wasn't even a pump fake....the idiot safety just did whatever he wanted (it's 3 vs 2 and you are a safety)

Its common mistake when you've throw underneath all game. His eyes got him in trouble.
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: sys on January 09, 2017, 10:27:54 PM
clemson moves with the ball pretty good.
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: kso_FAN on January 09, 2017, 10:30:31 PM
clemson moves with the ball pretty good.

Yes. Their 2nd half offense has picked up considerably.

YPP   5.66
PPP   0.48
PPD   2.80
PPD<40   7.00
Succ%   51.7%

Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: wetwillie on January 09, 2017, 10:35:33 PM
Man I hope Clemson can pull this out. 
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: star seed 7 on January 09, 2017, 10:35:52 PM
Love all these screens. Member when the cats did lots of fun screens? I do
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: sys on January 09, 2017, 10:37:00 PM
Love all these screens. Member when the cats did lots of fun screens? I do

screens seem like one of the best plays, if you're one of those teams that likes to pass lots.
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: Powercat Posse on January 09, 2017, 10:38:33 PM
Last 9 drives for each team---
Clemson 49 plays, 311 yds of offense
Bama 27 plays 70 yds (and then 1 pathetic blown 68 yd play)
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: star seed 7 on January 09, 2017, 10:42:52 PM
Love all these screens. Member when the cats did lots of fun screens? I do

screens seem like one of the best plays, if you're one of those teams that likes to pass lots.

They are great for everyone except slow people teams
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: Powercat Posse on January 09, 2017, 10:44:38 PM
And then Sark calls bubble go to the TE. Nice.

There were 2 Bama players on that side. 2 Clemson DBacks and a safety on the same side.

That's a HS bonehead mistake by that safety. Even if it's a quick throw, a Bama guy can only block 1 Clemson guy.  It wasn't even a pump fake....the idiot safety just did whatever he wanted (it's 3 vs 2 and you are a safety)

Its common mistake when you've throw underneath all game. His eyes got him in trouble.

Take out the word common, I agree. His eyes got him in trouble alright. He hauled ass to the line of scrimmage, but then didn't even see the Bama TE run right by him. 88 was 10 yds behind him before He knew what was happening. 
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: sys on January 09, 2017, 10:45:45 PM
if we keep stopping them all the time eventually we're gonna score one, following.
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) on January 09, 2017, 10:47:34 PM
I can't believe people are willing to put up with stream and go to the trouble of sharing passwords to save like $40 p/mo on cable/dish. :facepalm:
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: star seed 7 on January 09, 2017, 10:49:30 PM
We should get an interception next time
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: mocat on January 09, 2017, 10:53:13 PM
This renfro guy is a real wes welker type
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: sys on January 09, 2017, 10:53:55 PM
that poor young man is going to be killed.
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: kso_FAN on January 09, 2017, 10:54:17 PM
Take out the word common, I agree. His eyes got him in trouble alright. He hauled ass to the line of scrimmage, but then didn't even see the Bama TE run right by him. 88 was 10 yds behind him before He knew what was happening. 

Maybe common isn't the right word, but I wasn't surprised by it. Its the Art Briles Baylor concept of spreading the defense and throwing underneath bubble and now routes to the sideline. Eventually you will get the defense guessing, especially in that case with a TE there. My point is that it was great offense more than it was terrible defense. Granted, its a big defensive mistake, but its created by great playcalling IMO.
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: star seed 7 on January 09, 2017, 10:59:40 PM
So fun rn
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: Powercat Posse on January 09, 2017, 11:00:10 PM
11 drives for Bama since up 14-0
1 big play
77 yards other than that

Tremendous job by The Clemson Defense since the 2 score defecit
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: kso_FAN on January 09, 2017, 11:01:07 PM
11 drives for Bama since up 14-0
1 big play
77 yards other than that

Tremendous job by The Clemson Defense since the 2 score defecit

Yeah, Venables has dominated Sark.
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: star seed 7 on January 09, 2017, 11:05:12 PM
 :Chirp:
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: sys on January 09, 2017, 11:05:28 PM
we are playing like heroes, especially that zombie qb.
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: 8manpick on January 09, 2017, 11:07:11 PM
Great game!
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: kso_FAN on January 09, 2017, 11:07:43 PM
Clemson's 2nd half offense:

YPP   5.77
PPP   0.49
PPD   2.63
PPD<40   7.00
Succ%   48.8%
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: Powercat Posse on January 09, 2017, 11:08:22 PM
This is incredible and awesome.

Hang tough Clemson.
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: sys on January 09, 2017, 11:08:38 PM
i'm no football historian, but it seems to me like kicking and punting strategy has changed as much or more than anything else besides helmet roundness over the last decade or so.
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: sys on January 09, 2017, 11:10:42 PM
goddamnit.  and goddamn that one young man that kinda stopped chasing the qb.
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: 8manpick on January 09, 2017, 11:10:52 PM
Ugh
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: star seed 7 on January 09, 2017, 11:11:07 PM
Sheesh
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: sys on January 09, 2017, 11:16:48 PM
i hope clemson isn't one of those teams that uses a walkon kicker so they could fit one more fourth string linebacker on the team.
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: Dr Rick Daris on January 09, 2017, 11:18:33 PM
This game is increds
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: Powercat Posse on January 09, 2017, 11:20:22 PM
Is Dabo using the Andy Reid 2 minute playbook?

Not calling TOs. WTF
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: sys on January 09, 2017, 11:21:00 PM
holy balls, you hero zombie qb.
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: 8manpick on January 09, 2017, 11:21:03 PM
Right up there with Vince Young vs USC
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: Powercat Posse on January 09, 2017, 11:23:05 PM
Right up there with Vince Young vs USC

Yes. 100%. Exactly what I was about to type
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: chum1 on January 09, 2017, 11:23:24 PM
 :D
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: kso_FAN on January 09, 2017, 11:23:48 PM
What a great football game, especially the 4th quarter.

Clemson destroyed Saban's vaunted defense.
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: EMAWzifried on January 09, 2017, 11:27:00 PM
SEC defense gives up 21 points in fourth quarter. pfffft
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: star seed 7 on January 09, 2017, 11:29:02 PM
I love when good things happen in sports
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: pvegs on January 09, 2017, 11:29:21 PM
our hero hunter renfrow had offers from gardner-webb, furman, appalachian state, presbyterian, and wofford out of high school. positively k-statean
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: sys on January 09, 2017, 11:30:01 PM
for me the best part was when alabama lost.
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: EMAWzifried on January 09, 2017, 11:33:04 PM
Dah-bo is just wrong, somehow.
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: Powercat Posse on January 09, 2017, 11:33:30 PM
What a great football game, especially the 4th quarter.

Clemson destroyed Saban's vaunted defense.

Yes.

Clemson got ball with 7:42 in 2nd quarter and put up 436 yds the rest of the game. And scored 35 pts
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: star seed 7 on January 09, 2017, 11:35:16 PM
So dabo is def replacing saban when he leaves
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: kso_FAN on January 09, 2017, 11:43:01 PM
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/C1yWKjmUsAEEWLc.jpg:large)
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: nicname on January 09, 2017, 11:45:17 PM
That dood just went straight Jonny Gomes.
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: Powercat Posse on January 09, 2017, 11:49:31 PM
We saw a team hit a game winning 3 at the buzzer to win the NCAA basketball title in April

Now we see a team throw a game winning TD pass with :01 left in the National Championship game

I. LOVE. SPORTS.   :love:
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: EMAWzifried on January 09, 2017, 11:54:39 PM
Big 12 refs did their best to ruin the game. Almost feel like the conference should apologize to college football.
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: MakeItRain on January 10, 2017, 02:12:23 AM
i'm no football historian, but it seems to me like kicking and punting strategy has changed as much or more than anything else besides helmet roundness over the last decade or so.
Clemson just has terrible kickers and it almost cost them the game. Their kickoff after the next to last touchdown that have Alabama the ball at like the 36 yard line was the worst kickoff I've ever seen.
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: MakeItRain on January 10, 2017, 02:13:09 AM
Big 12 refs did their best to ruin the game. Almost feel like the conference should apologize to college football.

What are you talking about?
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: star seed 7 on January 10, 2017, 08:27:42 AM
He's mad they got the review correct
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: wetwillie on January 10, 2017, 08:28:52 AM
Did saban do a post game presser? I was hoping someone asked him about kiffen.
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: mhkpasa on January 10, 2017, 08:43:08 AM
i'm no football historian, but it seems to me like kicking and punting strategy has changed as much or more than anything else besides helmet roundness over the last decade or so.
Clemson just has terrible kickers and it almost cost them the game. Their kickoff after the next to last touchdown that have Alabama the ball at like the 36 yard line was the worst kickoff I've ever seen.

That wasn't an intentional pooch?
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: DOD Take 2 on January 10, 2017, 09:41:52 AM
11 drives for Bama since up 14-0
1 big play
77 yards other than that

Tremendous job by The Clemson Defense since the 2 score defecit

Yeah, Venables has dominated Sark.

Even the big runs Alabama had early were mistakes by players not getting to the edge (first TD I think it was there was a massive hold that prevented the guy from getting outside). Basically 24 Alabama points were big mistakes by Clemson players. Sort of reminiscent of last year where Jayron Kearse made 2 or 3 errors that led to big TDs.

The success rate on your game stats post really helps tell the story of how well Clemson's defense played outside of a couple of plays.
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: kso_FAN on January 10, 2017, 09:59:58 AM
Even the big runs Alabama had early were mistakes by players not getting to the edge (first TD I think it was there was a massive hold that prevented the guy from getting outside). Basically 24 Alabama points were big mistakes by Clemson players. Sort of reminiscent of last year where Jayron Kearse made 2 or 3 errors that led to big TDs.

The success rate on your game stats post really helps tell the story of how well Clemson's defense played outside of a couple of plays.

This is true. Success rate isn't a "be all, end all" stat, but I think it does a good job of showing how well teams are running offense overall. Of course, you can take advantage of some turnovers, field position, and have a couple big plays and still have decent YPP/PPP offense, which is sort of what Alabama did last night. It was interesting to watch the teams flip as Alabama's defense dominated early, then as the game went on Clemson's defense dominated.
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: chum1 on January 10, 2017, 03:34:30 PM
This is brilliant.

http://www.wsj.com/articles/why-didnt-alabama-commit-pass-interference-on-the-final-play-1484075011
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: star seed 7 on January 10, 2017, 04:07:24 PM
Can you c&p
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: chum1 on January 10, 2017, 04:31:57 PM
Why Didn’t Alabama Commit Pass Interference on the Final Play?

An intentional penalty might have been Alabama’s best strategy to beat Clemson for the national championship. But they played it straight—and lost.


Clemson was at the 2-yard line down three points with only seconds left in Monday’s national championship when the Tigers called one last play.

With the national title at stake, Alabama still had a way to ensure its optimal scenario. So why didn’t the Crimson Tide use it?

All they had to do was commit an obvious pass-interference penalty. It was the one time all season that Alabama’s defenders wrapping Clemson’s receivers in enormous bear hugs actually would have been the right strategy. And yet the idea of an intentional penalty—like a hack in basketball—is so unthinkable in college football that a team with the sport’s most dominant coach wouldn’t even try it when it was his best shot to win the national title.

A penalty would’ve resulted in a first-and-goal for the Tigers at the 1-yard line—with enough time on the clock to run exactly one more play. Even if there were no time remaining, though, Clemson would’ve been entitled to that play because the game can’t end on a defensive flag.

But that would have left Tigers coach Dabo Swinney with a hugely risky decision in a 31-28 game: take the points for overtime, or take a shot at the national title? The former was Alabama’s best-case scenario barring a highly unlikely turnover. The latter was the lousy situation they were already in.

Taking a penalty on purpose in this situation may seem radical, but it’s actually an established football strategy that can be traced to one football’s greatest defensive minds: former NFL coach Buddy Ryan. The goal-line play is detailed in a page of Ryan’s old playbook that Chris B. Brown published on his website Smart Football. Brown called it “clever and devious.”

Ryan’s plan sent three extra linebackers onto the field to help accomplish his one goal: force the referees to throw a penalty flag. That sentiment might violate the spirit of the game and not win many friends. But it’s also a perfectly legal play—a loophole waiting to be exploited—to win games.

“We want to stop their offense from scoring, and in the process, we want to run the clock down to where they have enough time for just one play,” Ryan wrote, according to Smart Football. “So, we will stop them, get penalized half the distance to the goal, but leave them with enough time to run one play. We will then go back to our regular goal-line defense and stop them to win the game.”

Alabama wouldn’t have been able to do this an infinite number of times. But assuming it worked, they only would’ve needed to do it once. “If it happened more than once and was so blatant as to be obviously intentional, then the rules allow for the referee to award the touchdown anyway,” said Rogers Redding, the NCAA’s officiating coordinator. “The procedure would be that the referee would warn the defensive coach that if it happens again, the touchdown would be awarded and the game would be over.”

Swinney would’ve had a tricky decision if Saban forced his hand. He’s not exactly conservative, but he probably would have sent his kicking team and taken his chances in overtime, as most coaches would.

And he wouldn’t have been wrong. Clemson had already run more plays against Alabama than any team in the Saban era. Tigers coaches thought before the game that 80 plays would tire Alabama. This would have been their 100th. It was clearly working: Alabama’s defense had cracked, and Clemson suddenly had an edge.

But overtime also presupposed that Clemson kicker Greg Huegel would’ve made the biggest field goal of his life. The short kick itself would’ve been a gimme, though not a certainty: Huegel had attempted only three field goals since Nov. 12 and missed two of them.

And who knows what might’ve happened in overtime? No one now. Because instead of making an unconventional but potentially brilliant call, Alabama played it straight.

Clemson ran a cunning play of its own—a “rub” route in which one receiver essentially sets a pick for the other—and Hunter Renfrow caught the go-ahead, game-winning touchdown pass with one second left.

There were no flags on the play.
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: DOD Take 2 on January 10, 2017, 05:23:47 PM
The 49ers did this earlier this year

http://www.espn.com/blog/san-francisco-49ers/post/_/id/21042/49ers-purposeful-holding-held-saints-to-a-field-goal (http://www.espn.com/blog/san-francisco-49ers/post/_/id/21042/49ers-purposeful-holding-held-saints-to-a-field-goal)
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: MakeItRain on January 11, 2017, 12:51:02 AM
i'm no football historian, but it seems to me like kicking and punting strategy has changed as much or more than anything else besides helmet roundness over the last decade or so.
Clemson just has terrible kickers and it almost cost them the game. Their kickoff after the next to last touchdown that have Alabama the ball at like the 36 yard line was the worst kickoff I've ever seen.

That wasn't an intentional pooch?

It was and it was incredibly stupid to give up that much field poison at that point in the game.
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: Emo EMAW on January 11, 2017, 02:12:28 PM
Clemsons kicking game infuriated me.
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: kso_FAN on January 11, 2017, 02:15:16 PM
A good article outlining several of the things that Clemson overcame (punts, TOs, field position) to win vs Alabama.

http://www.footballoutsiders.com/fei-ratings/2017/fei-2016-final
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: star seed 7 on January 11, 2017, 02:16:38 PM
I don't ever watch Alabama games so I just figured they had some monster returner clumpson was staying away from
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: MakeItRain on January 11, 2017, 03:55:31 PM
While watching that I couldn't help but think about the idiots who cry about Sean every time a field goal is missed or we give up a 20 yard return.
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: michigancat on January 11, 2017, 06:17:08 PM
While watching that I couldn't help but think about the idiots who cry about Sean every time a field goal is missed or we give up a 20 yard return.

I was thinking that Dabo wasn't even a coordinator when he was hired! Kinda similar thoughts
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: MakeItRain on January 11, 2017, 08:45:05 PM
While watching that I couldn't help but think about the idiots who cry about Sean every time a field goal is missed or we give up a 20 yard return.

I was thinking that Dabo wasn't even a coordinator when he was hired! Kinda similar thoughts

He clearly thinks about it a lot. He was reppin hard for the AD who hired him in the post game.
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: sonofdaxjones on January 11, 2017, 11:10:35 PM
People cry about Sean?  Weird
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: 420seriouscat69 on January 12, 2017, 08:48:01 AM
People cry about Sean?  Weird
It honestly is. National special teams coach of the year and all and ppl still try to put a clown suit on him on here.
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: DQ12 on January 12, 2017, 09:08:48 AM
People cry about Sean?  Weird
It honestly is. National special teams coach of the year and all and ppl still try to put a clown suit on him on here.
I assumed people bitching about ST Coordinator Sean were being sarcastic.
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: pissclams on January 12, 2017, 10:19:24 AM
people bitching about sean only do so because his name has been connected to bill's position when he steps down.  it has zero to do with ST performance.
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: 420seriouscat69 on January 12, 2017, 10:45:51 AM
People cry about Sean?  Weird
It honestly is. National special teams coach of the year and all and ppl still try to put a clown suit on him on here.
I assumed people bitching about ST Coordinator Sean were being sarcastic.
Many weren't being that way. I'm sure it's for the reasoning that clams just listed, but it's still super dumb.
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: sonofdaxjones on January 12, 2017, 10:51:04 AM
Some people don't get sarcasm, and they consider any perceived criticism of K-State a personal affront.

With that said, when you have a dad who has ensured that the son has a lifetime contract with K-State, and the son has been handed the keys if you will, and been appointed a significant role almost exclusively for just being the son.  Then one can expect a little mockery when the son's area of responsibility doesn't perform well. 



Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: DQ12 on January 12, 2017, 11:21:50 AM
yeah but the thing is, he's performed his role as ST coordinator better than just about anyone in the country. 
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: pissclams on January 12, 2017, 11:45:42 AM
yeah but the thing is, he's performed his role as ST coordinator better than just about anyone in the country. 

well eff it then, you can consider my tear flow to have stopped.  that's right, i said it.  no. more. tears.
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: BackPayne on January 12, 2017, 12:14:34 PM
yeah but the thing is, he's performed his role as ST coordinator better than just about anyone in the country.

Well, successful ST coach does translate to successful HC. Just look at all the success stories.
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: kso_FAN on January 12, 2017, 12:33:03 PM
I don't think anyone really thinks that Sean is HC material based on ST success.

I do think some fans are overly harsh on Sean because of his connection to Bill. It would be one thing if his STs were bad, but they have been the strongest unit during Snyder 2.0, followed closely by the offense. He deserves credit for coordinating a very good group year in and year out.
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: MadCat on January 12, 2017, 01:24:29 PM
yeah but the thing is, he's performed his role as ST coordinator better than just about anyone in the country. 

well eff it then, you can consider my tear flow to have stopped.  that's right, i said it.  no. more. tears.

[youtube]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CprfjfN5PRs[/youtube]
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: Emo EMAW on January 12, 2017, 08:43:24 PM
I will admit to expecting a lot from our ST, and I'm often surprised at how other teams suck so bad at them (compared to us).
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: porky morgan on January 12, 2017, 09:04:48 PM
Sean deserves a lot of credit I'm sure, but it seems Kstate uses more front line players on ST than most schools, and it works, but is kind of risky given our constant lack of depth.
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: MakeItRain on January 12, 2017, 09:10:05 PM
People cry about Sean?  Weird
It honestly is. National special teams coach of the year and all and ppl still try to put a clown suit on him on here.
I assumed people bitching about ST Coordinator Sean were being sarcastic.

They are real, shocking as it may be. Do a search of "Sean" and see for yourself, people are really dumb.
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: kso_FAN on January 12, 2017, 10:10:45 PM
I mean, it's not like Sean is the only case of this.
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: Tobias on January 12, 2017, 10:16:13 PM
If you hate Sean you hate K-State, and if you hate K-State, you hate America. And if you hate America, well, you can just git out.
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: joda on January 12, 2017, 11:08:40 PM
If you hate Sean you hate K-State, and if you hate K-State, you hate America. And if you hate America, well, you can just git out.

Holy crap, I have no recollection of making this post :love:
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: mocat on September 18, 2018, 07:03:12 AM
Mahomes declared  :love:
He's the best qb in the draft but the idiot media won't position him that way. Mitch Trubiski, LOL

This is a good one :love:
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: 8manpick on September 18, 2018, 07:28:13 AM
After watching the Bears game last night I have no idea how an evaluator would end up with Trubisky 8/10 slots higher than Mahomes and Watson
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: catastrophe on September 21, 2018, 07:27:50 PM
FAU / UCF shaping up to be a treat
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: CHONGS on September 21, 2018, 07:37:48 PM
You guys excited for some Illinois football?!
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: CHONGS on September 21, 2018, 08:09:48 PM
You guys excited for some Illinois football?!
:excited:
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: CHONGS on September 21, 2018, 08:41:26 PM
#littyville
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: CHONGS on September 21, 2018, 08:53:19 PM
#boooooo
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: DaBigTrain on September 29, 2018, 10:11:27 AM
@WackyCat08  :barf:

(https://uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/20180929/0a7c45c7f524cbc2579fd9566beb989d.jpg)
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: catastrophe on September 29, 2018, 11:42:49 AM
WVU appears to be p good
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: Super PurpleCat on September 30, 2018, 01:13:44 PM
LSU is fun to watch.
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: DaBigTrain on October 06, 2018, 11:05:46 AM
This OU vs Texas game should be fun
Title: Re: 2016 non-qhatz ncaa football
Post by: DaBigTrain on November 03, 2018, 02:39:18 PM
Yikes Okie State