Author Topic: DNC  (Read 36981 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline sonofdaxjones

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 53697
    • View Profile
DNC
« Reply #525 on: July 27, 2016, 04:10:37 PM »
Here's some political views from 25 years ago,  take that liberals!

GOP President in the 1980's "Mr. Gorbachev tear down this wall"
GOP Nominee in 2016 "I'm not gonna tell Putin what to do"

WHY IS THE GOP FULL OF HYPOCRITES?!?!?!?!

Which president had a spouse who was a senator/SOS/Pres candidate after they were president and who collectively ran the biggest husband/wife political pay to play operation after the initial presidential term ended and while one spouse was a senator/SOS/Pres candidate??

Context

And that's any worse than the guy who's business is cash strapped, so has been taking investment money from Russian oligarchs, and has given every hint imaginable he is close to the Russians?

I mean are the Clintons any worse than Truman getting his political career started by Tom Pendergast?
If we're gonna have a corrupt person in charge, I'd like it to be the one who is campaigning on the issues I agree with even if she might not implement them.

Truman-Chump Change

Trump-Private Businessman

Clintons-Selling favors all over the world to the tune of hundreds of millions dollars in personal income while a senator and cabinet member.   Many of those deals negatively impacting the US, and likely creating illicit influences or even blackmail at some point in the future.   Not to mention dealing with some of the most oppressive regimes in the world.

Offline sonofdaxjones

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 53697
    • View Profile
Re: DNC
« Reply #526 on: July 27, 2016, 04:12:55 PM »
dax why are you making fun of 1992 dems for being similar to 2016 pubs (the party you support)? weird

Registered independent not voting for Trump but ardent anti Clintonite.

Offline star seed 7

  • hyperactive on the :lol:
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 64303
  • good dog
    • View Profile
Re: DNC
« Reply #527 on: July 27, 2016, 04:22:09 PM »
92 bill clinton was still more progressive than the 2016 republican party platform  :lol:

The way you use "progressive" doesn't actually connote progress.

The republicans certainly haven't progressed, you are correct
Hyperbolic partisan duplicitous hypocrite

Offline chuckjames

  • Combo-Fan
  • **
  • Posts: 858
    • View Profile
Re: DNC
« Reply #528 on: July 27, 2016, 04:25:05 PM »
Here's some political views from 25 years ago,  take that liberals!

GOP President in the 1980's "Mr. Gorbachev tear down this wall"
GOP Nominee in 2016 "I'm not gonna tell Putin what to do"

WHY IS THE GOP FULL OF HYPOCRITES?!?!?!?!

Which president had a spouse who was a senator/SOS/Pres candidate after they were president and who collectively ran the biggest husband/wife political pay to play operation after the initial presidential term ended and while one spouse was a senator/SOS/Pres candidate??

Context

And that's any worse than the guy who's business is cash strapped, so has been taking investment money from Russian oligarchs, and has given every hint imaginable he is close to the Russians?

I mean are the Clintons any worse than Truman getting his political career started by Tom Pendergast?
If we're gonna have a corrupt person in charge, I'd like it to be the one who is campaigning on the issues I agree with even if she might not implement them.

Truman-Chump Change

Trump-Private Businessman

Clintons-Selling favors all over the world to the tune of hundreds of millions dollars in personal income while a senator and cabinet member.   Many of those deals negatively impacting the US, and likely creating illicit influences or even blackmail at some point in the future.   Not to mention dealing with some of the most oppressive regimes in the world.

Would you consider Russia one of the most corrupt regimes in the world? Again I think it's becoming very clear that Putin and Trump have a deal worked out. I mean at least the Clinton's had the good sense to try and hide their foreign influence, that you say is prevalent.

https://twitter.com/interpreter_mag/status/758387942872190977

Offline sonofdaxjones

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 53697
    • View Profile
DNC
« Reply #529 on: July 27, 2016, 04:26:54 PM »
The Clintons put together a great Uranium deal for a Canadian company owned by the Russians.

Offline chuckjames

  • Combo-Fan
  • **
  • Posts: 858
    • View Profile
Re: DNC
« Reply #530 on: July 27, 2016, 04:44:57 PM »
The Clintons put together a great Uranium deal for a Canadian company owned by the Russians.

So then why doesn't Putin want them to win?

Offline ChiComCat

  • Chawbacon
  • Contributor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 17650
    • View Profile
Re: DNC
« Reply #531 on: July 27, 2016, 04:48:17 PM »
I don't think Putin/Trump necessarily have a deal worked out but I think Putin knows that a Trump presidency will be good for Russia.

Offline Rage Against the McKee

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 37171
    • View Profile
Re: DNC
« Reply #532 on: July 27, 2016, 04:49:22 PM »
I think it's great that the DNC got hacked.

Offline sonofdaxjones

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 53697
    • View Profile
Re: DNC
« Reply #533 on: July 27, 2016, 04:50:07 PM »
The Clintons put together a great Uranium deal for a Canadian company owned by the Russians.

So then why doesn't Putin want them to win?

Maybe Putin doesn't like them?  Remember Clintler as the shitty SOS, and the reset button?   Maybe he's pissed off about Syria, another Hillary disaster. 

Offline sonofdaxjones

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 53697
    • View Profile
Re: DNC
« Reply #534 on: July 27, 2016, 04:56:37 PM »
The Clintons put together a great Uranium deal for a Canadian company owned by the Russians.

So then why doesn't Putin want them to win?

Maybe Putin doesn't like them?  Remember Clintler as the shitty SOS, and the reset button?   Maybe he's pissed off about Syria, another Hillary disaster.

It's pretty obvious Jill Stein is pulling the strings on this one Dax.

Agreed

Offline puniraptor

  • Tastemaker
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 21338
  • nostalgic reason
    • View Profile
Re: DNC
« Reply #535 on: July 27, 2016, 05:49:56 PM »
This ladie's delivery is unbearable

Offline puniraptor

  • Tastemaker
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 21338
  • nostalgic reason
    • View Profile
Re: DNC
« Reply #536 on: July 27, 2016, 05:57:31 PM »
Is diamond Joe sparkling today?

Offline Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!)

  • Racist Piece of Shit
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 18431
  • Kiss my ass and suck my dick
    • View Profile
    • I am the one and only Sugar Dick
Re: DNC
« Reply #537 on: July 27, 2016, 07:23:50 PM »
Here's some political views from 25 years ago,  take that liberals!

GOP President in the 1980's "Mr. Gorbachev tear down this wall"
GOP Nominee in 2016 "I'm not gonna tell Putin what to do"

WHY IS THE GOP FULL OF HYPOCRITES?!?!?!?!

Which president had a spouse who was a senator/SOS/Pres candidate after they were president and who collectively ran the biggest husband/wife political pay to play operation after the initial presidential term ended and while one spouse was a senator/SOS/Pres candidate??

Context

And that's any worse than the guy who's business is cash strapped, so has been taking investment money from Russian oligarchs, and has given every hint imaginable he is close to the Russians?

I mean are the Clintons any worse than Truman getting his political career started by Tom Pendergast?
If we're gonna have a corrupt person in charge, I'd like it to be the one who is campaigning on the issues I agree with even if she might not implement them.

Truman-Chump Change

Trump-Private Businessman

Clintons-Selling favors all over the world to the tune of hundreds of millions dollars in personal income while a senator and cabinet member.   Many of those deals negatively impacting the US, and likely creating illicit influences or even blackmail at some point in the future.   Not to mention dealing with some of the most oppressive regimes in the world.

Would you consider Russia one of the most corrupt regimes in the world? Again I think it's becoming very clear that Putin and Trump have a deal worked out. I mean at least the Clinton's had the good sense to try and hide their foreign influence, that you say is prevalent.

https://twitter.com/interpreter_mag/status/758387942872190977

Are so you rough ridin' demented and delusional that you somehow think this report is an indictment on trump, let alone evidence of a secret deal?

There is an actual dnc email where they conjure a plan to place a fake trump ad on craigslist to hire women that is intentionally sexist.
« Last Edit: July 27, 2016, 07:44:40 PM by Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) »
goEMAW Karmic BBS Shepherd

Offline Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!)

  • Racist Piece of Shit
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 18431
  • Kiss my ass and suck my dick
    • View Profile
    • I am the one and only Sugar Dick
Re: DNC
« Reply #538 on: July 27, 2016, 07:25:30 PM »
I don't think Putin/Trump necessarily have a deal worked out but I think Putin knows that a Trump presidency will be good for Russia.

Russia has expandef under b.o./clinton, without recourse, so that seems unlikely
goEMAW Karmic BBS Shepherd

Offline puniraptor

  • Tastemaker
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 21338
  • nostalgic reason
    • View Profile
Re: DNC
« Reply #539 on: July 27, 2016, 07:27:04 PM »
So rough ridin' weird right now

Offline chum1

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 21953
    • View Profile
Re: DNC
« Reply #540 on: July 27, 2016, 07:59:20 PM »
Super rowdy. Heckled the crap out of Leon Panetta.

Offline chum1

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 21953
    • View Profile
Re: DNC
« Reply #541 on: July 27, 2016, 08:02:18 PM »
Biden time.

Offline star seed 7

  • hyperactive on the :lol:
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 64303
  • good dog
    • View Profile
Re: DNC
« Reply #542 on: July 27, 2016, 08:13:34 PM »
thanks for the heads up  :thumbs:
Hyperbolic partisan duplicitous hypocrite

Offline star seed 7

  • hyperactive on the :lol:
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 64303
  • good dog
    • View Profile
Re: DNC
« Reply #543 on: July 27, 2016, 08:15:22 PM »
uncle joe is looking a little trump orange
Hyperbolic partisan duplicitous hypocrite

Offline star seed 7

  • hyperactive on the :lol:
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 64303
  • good dog
    • View Profile
Re: DNC
« Reply #544 on: July 27, 2016, 08:20:28 PM »
bunch of malarky shout out
Hyperbolic partisan duplicitous hypocrite

Offline john "teach me how to" dougie

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 7658
  • 1cat
    • View Profile
Re: DNC
« Reply #545 on: July 27, 2016, 08:21:34 PM »
Joe thinks the Apprentice show was real!

Offline sys

  • Contributor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 40570
  • your reputation will never recover, nor should it.
    • View Profile
Re: DNC
« Reply #546 on: July 27, 2016, 08:22:33 PM »
could have beat clinton without getting out of bed and trump without leaving the kitchen.  why, biden, why?
"experienced commanders will simply be smeared and will actually go to the meat."

Offline puniraptor

  • Tastemaker
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 21338
  • nostalgic reason
    • View Profile
Re: DNC
« Reply #547 on: July 27, 2016, 08:24:53 PM »
Joe thinks the Apprentice show was real!
Just like Donald.

Offline sys

  • Contributor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 40570
  • your reputation will never recover, nor should it.
    • View Profile
Re: DNC
« Reply #548 on: July 27, 2016, 08:25:34 PM »
stop chanting and let the man talk, you idiots.
"experienced commanders will simply be smeared and will actually go to the meat."

Offline sys

  • Contributor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 40570
  • your reputation will never recover, nor should it.
    • View Profile
Re: DNC
« Reply #549 on: July 27, 2016, 08:34:01 PM »
bloomsie!
"experienced commanders will simply be smeared and will actually go to the meat."