Author Topic: The United States-Over 5000 Nukes. But you . . . Iran . . .  (Read 19586 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline sonofdaxjones

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 52963
    • View Profile
Re: The United States-Over 5000 Nukes. But you . . . Iran . . .
« Reply #100 on: June 20, 2019, 03:13:53 PM »
 :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: at resident LibDerps who always try and claim the past, particularly the very recent past just doesn't matter anymore.

It's just so very sad.

But it's still  :lol:  :lol:  :lol:  :lol:  :lol:

Offline Dugout DickStone

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 51305
  • BSPAC
    • View Profile
Re: The United States-Over 5000 Nukes. But you . . . Iran . . .
« Reply #101 on: June 20, 2019, 03:23:20 PM »
dax really underestimated the gE cloud storage

Offline LickNeckey

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 6004
  • #fakeposts
    • View Profile
Re: The United States-Over 5000 Nukes. But you . . . Iran . . .
« Reply #102 on: June 20, 2019, 04:28:59 PM »
As far as Pakistan goes, yeah, we actually have plans to just "march in there and take them" if need be.

The goose steppers are missing the point here as always.   

Look at what we as a nation do, and then ask yourself why other nations react the way they do. 

Oh but wait, Barry W. Obama is now parroting the same Terra-ists lines and "can't let'm have nukes" lines of the previous administration and the Libratard ideologically driven useful idiots just line up and cheerlead.   

Just say no to war and U.S. hegemony . . . Unless a Democrat is president.



For a guy who has been closely analyzing the situation, you seem a bit out of the loop. 

1.  Nations have been acting in their sole best interests since the advent of the nation-state.

2.  It is not in the US's best interests to allow Iran to become another nation in possession of deployable nuclear technology. 

3.  Profit.

To take it a step further, and as someone who has spent countless hours and tons of banwidth closely monitoring the situation you are no doubt aware, Iran has done nothing short of attack our troops in Iraq.  They have waged armed war against our troops in Iraq.  I would like a list of countries who would provide a country they are in armed conflict with access to nuclear weapons if they could at all prevent it.



Geez Limestone . . . that's straight out the Blackwater/XE CEO's "Why the DOD needs us . . . because we can get around all that tricky legislative stuff" Handbook.   He's running around lobbying hard about how "evil" Iran is and how the administration and the DOD should be using them in a role to fight Iran because by gosh we just won't have the oversight that the U.S. military forces will have.   Why not I guess, XE already works hand in hand with the CIA in the illegal state sanctioned assassination program in Pakistan.   

Lots of war drum banging from a lot of folks over a country that to date hasn't been officially confirmed to have broken any IAEA provisions and if they did, it was at such a small scale it was essentially insignificant . . . but hey Hillary the War Monger says they're a "rogue nation" so it must be true right??  (Damn, this sounds so familiar).    Oh wait, wait . . . they "broke laws" by not telling the IAEA in a timely fashion about certain facilities.   Funny how they would act that way considering that Israel has a tendency to bomb things like that whether they're used for peaceful purposes or not.    Hillary apparently doesn't know the difference between non compliance and actual violations.   

So let's review:

The UN has confirmed that Iran does not have the capability enrich uranium up the levels necessary, and said back in Oct. of 2009 that Iran gave up it's nuclear ambitions 7 years ago.

The announcement of facilities has only been a "surprise" to US media and their propaganda puppets . . . U.S. intelligence says they've known about the facilities for years (again this sounds so damn familiar).

Iran has no aircraft carriers, space based weapons, strategic bombers, nothing but a regional navy, no military bases on U.S. borders, and missiles that can barely be called ballistic and have at best rudimentary guidance systems.

Oh yeah . . . hey didn't Iran decide to stop trading Oil in Dollars awhile back??   Hmmmm . . .

When is the IAEA going to be allowed to inspect the 75-200 nukes that Israel has . . . wait . . . what??

Funny thing is, political propagandist have been trying to vilify Iran on the Nuke Front for 25 years after the revolution . .   if you go back and read what some of them have said, Iran should have had nukes by 1990 . . . but the Iranian leadership wasn't vilified at all when the Shah announced their nuclear intentions as early as 1974 . . . funny  huh?? 

 :bwpopcorn:

Offline sonofdaxjones

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 52963
    • View Profile
Re: The United States-Over 5000 Nukes. But you . . . Iran . . .
« Reply #103 on: June 20, 2019, 06:05:14 PM »
Weird how the past matters when the resident LibDerps say it does . . .

There was no Iranian Nuclear "Deal" in 2010, the previous administration hadn't dumped pallets of cash on the runway in Tehran rewarding the Iranians for taking over the U.S. Embassy (pro-tip to the constantly behind the curve Dug, the Obama administration . . . who sought ZERO approvals for any of that action, said it was the money the U.S. froze back during the Iranian hostage crisis), rewarded Iran for ramping up their terror exports across the Middle East and also paid ransom for people that Iran held at the time.    Bad behavior (after 2010) got rewarded 3 times over by the previous administration.












Online Kat Kid

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 20444
    • View Profile
Re: The United States-Over 5000 Nukes. But you . . . Iran . . .
« Reply #104 on: June 20, 2019, 08:57:39 PM »
We should unilaterally give Iran nukes. Dax was right the first time.

Offline LickNeckey

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 6004
  • #fakeposts
    • View Profile
Re: The United States-Over 5000 Nukes. But you . . . Iran . . .
« Reply #105 on: June 20, 2019, 09:15:06 PM »
Weird how the past matters when the resident LibDerps say it does . . .

There was no Iranian Nuclear "Deal" in 2010, the previous administration hadn't dumped pallets of cash on the runway in Tehran rewarding the Iranians for taking over the U.S. Embassy (pro-tip to the constantly behind the curve Dug, the Obama administration . . . who sought ZERO approvals for any of that action, said it was the money the U.S. froze back during the Iranian hostage crisis), rewarded Iran for ramping up their terror exports across the Middle East and also paid ransom for people that Iran held at the time.    Bad behavior (after 2010) got rewarded 3 times over by the previous administration.

so Iran stopped acting in good faith toward the shared interest with the US after 2010

got it

Offline sonofdaxjones

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 52963
    • View Profile
Re: The United States-Over 5000 Nukes. But you . . . Iran . . .
« Reply #106 on: June 21, 2019, 03:47:20 AM »
Weird how the past matters when the resident LibDerps say it does . . .

There was no Iranian Nuclear "Deal" in 2010, the previous administration hadn't dumped pallets of cash on the runway in Tehran rewarding the Iranians for taking over the U.S. Embassy (pro-tip to the constantly behind the curve Dug, the Obama administration . . . who sought ZERO approvals for any of that action, said it was the money the U.S. froze back during the Iranian hostage crisis), rewarded Iran for ramping up their terror exports across the Middle East and also paid ransom for people that Iran held at the time.    Bad behavior (after 2010) got rewarded 3 times over by the previous administration.

so Iran stopped acting in good faith toward the shared interest with the US after 2010

got it


Shared interests?  LOL


Offline SkinnyBenny

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 16698
  • good time rock-n-roll plastic banana FM type
    • View Profile
Re: The United States-Over 5000 Nukes. But you . . . Iran . . .
« Reply #107 on: June 21, 2019, 10:18:42 AM »
This thread is actually a great example of daxmentia. In re-reading his posts from nine years ago, one doesn’t even need a dax decoder ring at all. Like, he wasn’t calling anyone LibDerps or ChiComs or New Neo-cons or anything. He just used actual words. Amazing to see.
"walking around mhk and crying in the rain because of love lost is the absolute purest and best thing in the world.  i hope i fall in love during the next few weeks and get my heart broken and it starts raining just to experience it one last time."   --Dlew12

Offline Dugout DickStone

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 51305
  • BSPAC
    • View Profile
Re: The United States-Over 5000 Nukes. But you . . . Iran . . .
« Reply #108 on: June 21, 2019, 11:35:58 AM »
Anyone new to the pit should read this thread then read dax’s latestest maga posts.  It’s 180 degrees and he won’t even address it

Offline LickNeckey

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 6004
  • #fakeposts
    • View Profile
Re: The United States-Over 5000 Nukes. But you . . . Iran . . .
« Reply #109 on: June 21, 2019, 12:30:42 PM »
that was all before obummer and killary did some stuff...

Offline sonofdaxjones

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 52963
    • View Profile
Re: The United States-Over 5000 Nukes. But you . . . Iran . . .
« Reply #110 on: June 21, 2019, 01:08:57 PM »
You guys hadn't completely gone into perpetual meltdown whack-a-doo land 10 years ago.   


Offline SkinnyBenny

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 16698
  • good time rock-n-roll plastic banana FM type
    • View Profile
Re: The United States-Over 5000 Nukes. But you . . . Iran . . .
« Reply #111 on: June 21, 2019, 03:03:04 PM »
Ooh, whack-a-doo, that’s another one. Thanks dax :thumbs:
"walking around mhk and crying in the rain because of love lost is the absolute purest and best thing in the world.  i hope i fall in love during the next few weeks and get my heart broken and it starts raining just to experience it one last time."   --Dlew12

Offline Dugout DickStone

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 51305
  • BSPAC
    • View Profile
Re: The United States-Over 5000 Nukes. But you . . . Iran . . .
« Reply #112 on: June 21, 2019, 03:10:14 PM »
You guys hadn't completely gone into perpetual meltdown whack-a-doo land 10 years ago.

You were a lot sharper back then.  When was the last time you saw a neuro?

Online star seed 7

  • hyperactive on the :lol:
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 63770
  • good dog
    • View Profile
Re: The United States-Over 5000 Nukes. But you . . . Iran . . .
« Reply #113 on: June 21, 2019, 03:19:05 PM »
Only dax can read a decade old dax meltdown thread and conclude that it's everyone else that is in perpetual meltdown status.
Hyperbolic partisan duplicitous hypocrite

Offline DaBigTrain

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 11636
  • stuxnet, meltdown, spectre, Bitcoin, ffChamp
    • View Profile
Re: The United States-Over 5000 Nukes. But you . . . Iran . . .
« Reply #114 on: June 21, 2019, 03:27:07 PM »
Just because you're paranoid doesn't mean they aren't after you.
"The Times 03/Jan/2009 Chancellor on brink of second bailout for banks"

https://blockstream.info/block/000000000019d6689c085ae165831e934ff763ae46a2a6c172b3f1b60a8ce26f

Offline SkinnyBenny

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 16698
  • good time rock-n-roll plastic banana FM type
    • View Profile
Re: The United States-Over 5000 Nukes. But you . . . Iran . . .
« Reply #115 on: June 21, 2019, 03:58:45 PM »
ChiComJoe and perpetually enraged LibBot Nation are the ones who are in Full LibDerp freefall on their way to whack-a-doo status, guys.
"walking around mhk and crying in the rain because of love lost is the absolute purest and best thing in the world.  i hope i fall in love during the next few weeks and get my heart broken and it starts raining just to experience it one last time."   --Dlew12

Offline sonofdaxjones

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 52963
    • View Profile
Re: The United States-Over 5000 Nukes. But you . . . Iran . . .
« Reply #116 on: June 21, 2019, 03:59:21 PM »
Only dax can read a decade old dax meltdown thread and conclude that it's everyone else that is in perpetual meltdown status.

I wasn't talking about then . . . I'm talking about now.   


Offline sonofdaxjones

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 52963
    • View Profile
Re: The United States-Over 5000 Nukes. But you . . . Iran . . .
« Reply #117 on: June 21, 2019, 04:00:33 PM »
You guys hadn't completely gone into perpetual meltdown whack-a-doo land 10 years ago.

You were a lot sharper back then.  When was the last time you saw a neuro?

You've never been very sharp when it comes to these discussions.   


Offline sonofdaxjones

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 52963
    • View Profile
Re: The United States-Over 5000 Nukes. But you . . . Iran . . .
« Reply #118 on: June 21, 2019, 04:05:05 PM »
Anyone new to the pit should read this thread then read dax’s latestest maga posts.  It’s 180 degrees and he won’t even address it

180 degrees different relative to what?

Like I said, 10 years ago the your dear leader hadn't dumped a tarmac full of cash in Tehran, and Iran wasn't nearly as aggressive in exporting terror as they are now.   They also had vastly less capable missile platforms etc. etc. etc.   

There was also still 40K U.S. troops left in Iraq back in 2010  . . . and yet Iran has become even more aggressive since.

But remember . . . the past doesn't matter according to you guys.  So weird series of dumpster diving.


Offline Trim

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 41956
  • Pfizer PLUS Moderna and now Pfizer Bivalent
    • View Profile
Re: The United States-Over 5000 Nukes. But you . . . Iran . . .
« Reply #119 on: June 21, 2019, 04:17:38 PM »
 :cry:

Offline Dugout DickStone

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 51305
  • BSPAC
    • View Profile
Re: The United States-Over 5000 Nukes. But you . . . Iran . . .
« Reply #120 on: June 21, 2019, 07:30:57 PM »
:cry:

It’s actually a pretty good case study into the ravages of dementia in our elderly

Offline sonofdaxjones

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 52963
    • View Profile
Re: The United States-Over 5000 Nukes. But you . . . Iran . . .
« Reply #121 on: June 21, 2019, 07:34:29 PM »
:cry:

It’s actually a pretty good case study into the ravages of dementia in our elderly

Your new board name is Slow Dug


Offline Trim

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 41956
  • Pfizer PLUS Moderna and now Pfizer Bivalent
    • View Profile
Re: The United States-Over 5000 Nukes. But you . . . Iran . . .
« Reply #122 on: June 21, 2019, 11:16:13 PM »
:cry:

It’s actually a pretty good case study into the ravages of dementia in our elderly

 :bawl:

Offline Dugout DickStone

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 51305
  • BSPAC
    • View Profile
Re: The United States-Over 5000 Nukes. But you . . . Iran . . .
« Reply #123 on: June 22, 2019, 08:43:54 AM »
...in the final stages they are left with only redundant lame nicknames as a defense.  Do not tell them that no one thinks they are clever, it will destroy them.

Offline sonofdaxjones

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 52963
    • View Profile
Re: The United States-Over 5000 Nukes. But you . . . Iran . . .
« Reply #124 on: June 22, 2019, 11:10:20 AM »
...in the final stages they are left with only redundant lame nicknames as a defense.  Do not tell them that no one thinks they are clever, it will destroy them.

Good one Slow Dug.