As far as Pakistan goes, yeah, we actually have plans to just "march in there and take them" if need be.
The goose steppers are missing the point here as always.
Look at what we as a nation do, and then ask yourself why other nations react the way they do.
Oh but wait, Barry W. Obama is now parroting the same Terra-ists lines and "can't let'm have nukes" lines of the previous administration and the Libratard ideologically driven useful idiots just line up and cheerlead.
Just say no to war and U.S. hegemony . . . Unless a Democrat is president.
For a guy who has been closely analyzing the situation, you seem a bit out of the loop.
1. Nations have been acting in their sole best interests since the advent of the nation-state.
2. It is not in the US's best interests to allow Iran to become another nation in possession of deployable nuclear technology.
3. Profit.
To take it a step further, and as someone who has spent countless hours and tons of banwidth closely monitoring the situation you are no doubt aware, Iran has done nothing short of attack our troops in Iraq. They have waged armed war against our troops in Iraq. I would like a list of countries who would provide a country they are in armed conflict with access to nuclear weapons if they could at all prevent it.
Geez Limestone . . . that's straight out the Blackwater/XE CEO's "Why the DOD needs us . . . because we can get around all that tricky legislative stuff" Handbook. He's running around lobbying hard about how "evil" Iran is and how the administration and the DOD should be using them in a role to fight Iran because by gosh we just won't have the oversight that the U.S. military forces will have. Why not I guess, XE already works hand in hand with the CIA in the illegal state sanctioned assassination program in Pakistan.
Lots of war drum banging from a lot of folks over a country that to date hasn't been officially confirmed to have broken any IAEA provisions and if they did, it was at such a small scale it was essentially insignificant . . . but hey Hillary the War Monger says they're a "rogue nation" so it must be true right?? (Damn, this sounds so familiar). Oh wait, wait . . . they "broke laws" by not telling the IAEA in a timely fashion about certain facilities. Funny how they would act that way considering that Israel has a tendency to bomb things like that whether they're used for peaceful purposes or not. Hillary apparently doesn't know the difference between non compliance and actual violations.
So let's review:
The UN has confirmed that Iran does not have the capability enrich uranium up the levels necessary, and said back in Oct. of 2009 that Iran gave up it's nuclear ambitions 7 years ago.
The announcement of facilities has only been a "surprise" to US media and their propaganda puppets . . . U.S. intelligence says they've known about the facilities for years (again this sounds so damn familiar).
Iran has no aircraft carriers, space based weapons, strategic bombers, nothing but a regional navy, no military bases on U.S. borders, and missiles that can barely be called ballistic and have at best rudimentary guidance systems.
Oh yeah . . . hey didn't Iran decide to stop trading Oil in Dollars awhile back?? Hmmmm . . .
When is the IAEA going to be allowed to inspect the 75-200 nukes that Israel has . . . wait . . . what??
Funny thing is, political propagandist have been trying to vilify Iran on the Nuke Front for 25 years after the revolution . . if you go back and read what some of them have said, Iran should have had nukes by 1990 . . . but the Iranian leadership wasn't vilified at all when the Shah announced their nuclear intentions as early as 1974 . . . funny huh??
