Author Topic: Kentucky's separate but equal marriage licenses (Read 4383 times)

renocat · « **on:** February 12, 2016, 05:22:15 PM »

God bless Kentucky. They are proposing two classes of marriage licenses. One for homosexual couples and one for heterosexual couples. The one for gays will say 1st party and second party. The other will be husband and wife. Both valid license that shows both unions as equal.

star seed 7 · « **Reply #1 on:** February 12, 2016, 05:24:31 PM »

CNS · « **Reply #2 on:** February 12, 2016, 05:27:47 PM »

Register your gays!

ednksu · « **Reply #3 on:** February 12, 2016, 05:37:06 PM »

Jfc did he really just support another separate but equal class system with that post?

OK_Cat · « **Reply #4 on:** February 12, 2016, 05:37:21 PM »

This worked well with giving the negros their own drinking fountains. What's the worst that could happen?

catastrophe · « **Reply #5 on:** February 12, 2016, 06:34:46 PM »

I think a better approach would be for both licenses to say husband and wife.

CNS · « **Reply #6 on:** February 12, 2016, 06:36:11 PM »

Kentucky: super butt hurt

star seed 7 · « **Reply #7 on:** February 12, 2016, 06:52:25 PM »

Quote from: CNS on February 12, 2016, 06:36:11 PM

Kentucky: super butt hurt

off the charts

sys · « **Reply #8 on:** February 12, 2016, 07:48:41 PM »

sounds fine. good job, kentucky.

MakeItRain · « **Reply #9 on:** February 12, 2016, 08:58:01 PM »

Quote from: ednksu on February 12, 2016, 05:37:06 PM

Jfc did he really just support another separate but equal class system with that post?

It's a sock who overreached a bit while trolling, outrage isn't merited

K-S-U-Wildcats! · « **Reply #10 on:** February 12, 2016, 09:30:06 PM »

Are there any gays kentuckians getting married, or is this just out of state gays starting trouble?

MakeItRain · « **Reply #11 on:** February 12, 2016, 10:36:38 PM »

Quote from: K-S-U-Wildcats! on February 12, 2016, 09:30:06 PM

Are there any gays kentuckians getting married, or is this just out of state gays starting trouble?

Why in the eff would anyone, gay or straight, go to Kentucky to get married to "start trouble?"

catastrophe · « **Reply #12 on:** February 12, 2016, 10:54:43 PM »

Quote from: MakeItRain on February 12, 2016, 10:36:38 PM

Quote from: K-S-U-Wildcats! on February 12, 2016, 09:30:06 PM
Are there any gays kentuckians getting married, or is this just out of state gays starting trouble?

Why in the eff would anyone, gay or straight, go to Kentucky

Dugout DickStone · « **Reply #13 on:** February 12, 2016, 10:57:43 PM »

You know those gays, always traveling to other states to get married to agitate

Ptolemy · « **Reply #14 on:** February 12, 2016, 11:18:05 PM »

Quote from: catastrophe on February 12, 2016, 06:34:46 PM

I think a better approach would be for both licenses to say husband and wife.

Which is which?

CNS · « **Reply #15 on:** February 13, 2016, 06:55:41 AM »

Lemy, that is up to you and your partner.

renocat · « **Reply #16 on:** February 19, 2016, 08:29:52 AM »

The bill has been passed out of the Kentucky senate, and headed to their conservative House. Is Kansas watching?

420seriouscat69 · « **Reply #17 on:** February 19, 2016, 09:07:07 AM »

Quote from: renocat on February 19, 2016, 08:29:52 AM

The bill has been passed out of the Kentucky senate, and headed to their conservative House. Is Kansas watching?

Renocat, I hope my gay married uncles don't have to go get a seperate license since they live in KS and love eachother. I hope they're not watching.

renocat · « **Reply #18 on:** February 19, 2016, 10:01:28 AM »

Quote from: WackyCat08 on February 19, 2016, 09:07:07 AM

Quote from: renocat on February 19, 2016, 08:29:52 AM
The bill has been passed out of the Kentucky senate, and headed to their conservative House. Is Kansas snatching?
Renocat, I hope my gay married uncles don't have to go get a seperate license since they live in KS and love eachother. I hope they're not watching.

I think this kind of petty too. Things will never change again back to the old days. So long as churches aren't forced to marry people, then I guess whatever. Just give a with a bunch of.options that they can check, a customized licence.

CNS · « **Reply #19 on:** February 19, 2016, 10:03:41 AM »

Or you could try not caring what two ppl call themselves inside their own marriage?

This is pretty difficult for the religitards(yeah I know, but sometimes it fits).

420seriouscat69 · « **Reply #20 on:** February 19, 2016, 10:12:24 AM »

My uncles have been together for 20 years. Both of them worked for Verizon and one of them was layed off recently. He wanted to get on my uncles insurance after that, but they wouldn't allow it since they "weren't married". I figured common law would kick in on an item like that, but it doesn't. They had to have a small wedding at their house, to get him on the insurance. You wanna talk about petty, renocat? My uncle never wanted to get married to his partner, because he feared what god would think. If god is that judgmental, then he can go eff himself. My uncles have a better relationship than any couple I know, but the government wants to restrict them of basic rights? They can get mumped too!

Mrs. Gooch · « **Reply #21 on:** February 19, 2016, 10:17:09 AM »

Quote from: WackyCat08 on February 19, 2016, 10:12:24 AM

My uncles have been together for 20 years. Both of them worked for Verizon and one of them was layed off recently. He wanted to get on my uncles insurance after that, but they wouldn't allow it since they "weren't married". I figured common law would kick in on an item like that, but it doesn't. They had to have a small wedding at their house, to get him on the insurance. You wanna talk about petty, renocat? My uncle never wanted to get married to his partner, because he feared what god would think. If god is that judgmental, then he can go eff himself. My uncles have a better relationship than any couple I know, but the government wants to restrict them of basic rights? They can get mumped too!

So sexing a guy is ok but not marrying him? (According to your uncle's god)

star seed 7 · « **Reply #22 on:** February 19, 2016, 10:18:55 AM »

Sounds more like he needed an excuse to not get married

Dugout DickStone · « **Reply #23 on:** February 19, 2016, 10:24:55 AM »

Quote from: WackyCat08 on February 19, 2016, 10:12:24 AM

My uncles have been together for 20 years. Both of them worked for Verizon and one of them was layed off recently. He wanted to get on my uncles insurance after that, but they wouldn't allow it since they "weren't married". I figured common law would kick in on an item like that, but it doesn't. They had to have a small wedding at their house, to get him on the insurance. You wanna talk about petty, renocat? My uncle never wanted to get married to his partner, because he feared what god would think. If god is that judgmental, then he can go eff himself. My uncles have a better relationship than any couple I know, but the government wants to restrict them of basic rights? They can get mumped too!

That is an odd outlook

420seriouscat69 · « **Reply #24 on:** February 19, 2016, 10:25:57 AM »

I don't know, man. We all make up our own moralities in our own heads. The Fannings are all over the top conservatives. There's lots of couples who spend a life time together, that don't feel the need of a label as "married".