Author Topic: I need Scott-ch (lots of it); Baylor ADV  (Read 5416 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Tobias

  • Fattyfest Champion
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 29146
  • hypoclique lieutenant
    • View Profile
Re: I need Scott-ch (lots of it); Baylor ADV
« Reply #25 on: January 21, 2016, 12:06:13 AM »
:emawkid: (weird breaking point tho)

Offline wetwillie

  • goEMAW Poster of the WEEK
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 30445
    • View Profile
Re: I need Scott-ch (lots of it); Baylor ADV
« Reply #26 on: January 21, 2016, 06:48:17 AM »
My only expectation for this season is that Randall and Hollywood and hot horn dogs get cray cray on spring break this year
When the bullets are flying, that's when I'm at my best

Offline Aggievillian

  • Fan
  • *
  • Posts: 24
    • View Profile
Re: I need Scott-ch (lots of it); Baylor ADV
« Reply #27 on: January 21, 2016, 07:55:45 AM »
Super frustrated with Wes.  45 minutes and had 7 turnovers and only one PF.  Feel like he is trying too hard on offense and not hard enough on defense...

Offline kso_FAN

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 29506
    • View Profile
Re: I need Scott-ch (lots of it); Baylor ADV
« Reply #28 on: January 21, 2016, 08:30:33 AM »
Super frustrated with Wes.  45 minutes and had 7 turnovers and only one PF.  Feel like he is trying too hard on offense and not hard enough on defense...

He has some amazingly bad unforced turnovers.

Offline Aggievillian

  • Fan
  • *
  • Posts: 24
    • View Profile
Re: I need Scott-ch (lots of it); Baylor ADV
« Reply #29 on: January 21, 2016, 08:35:57 AM »
Super frustrated with Wes.  45 minutes and had 7 turnovers and only one PF.  Feel like he is trying too hard on offense and not hard enough on defense...

He has some amazingly bad unforced turnovers.

Especially as the guy on our team who should be our ol'reliable...

Offline Gooch

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 9492
    • View Profile
Re: I need Scott-ch (lots of it); Baylor ADV
« Reply #30 on: January 21, 2016, 08:40:57 AM »
I actually watched all of that game last night. Never again.

Offline Pendergast

  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 1494
    • View Profile
Re: I need Scott-ch (lots of it); Baylor ADV
« Reply #31 on: January 21, 2016, 08:44:55 AM »
I find myself very apathetic about the whole thing, which is very unusual for me regarding any Cats sport.  After the game I just thought, huh, that was interesting.  And no fucks were given.  Sad state of affairs.

Offline Aggievillian

  • Fan
  • *
  • Posts: 24
    • View Profile
Re: I need Scott-ch (lots of it); Baylor ADV
« Reply #32 on: January 21, 2016, 08:46:28 AM »
I actually watched all of that game last night. Never again.

Team has been really fun to watch for about the first 35 minutes of games...All downhill for the last 5...

Offline ChiComCat

  • Chawbacon
  • Contributor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 17594
    • View Profile
Re: I need Scott-ch (lots of it); Baylor ADV
« Reply #33 on: January 21, 2016, 08:49:08 AM »
Chings won me over - we're on the right track.  It's a tough schedule and we are a young team.  oscar just needs a few more years.  We have a lot of the heart that was missing from last year's team and you can't teach that.

Offline AppleJack

  • AppleJack
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 6337
  • How are you doing today?
    • View Profile
Re: I need Scott-ch (lots of it); Baylor ADV
« Reply #34 on: January 21, 2016, 08:55:40 AM »
I liked the play where they would try the backdoor oop and just launch it out of bounds or slam is off the backboard.
When one person, for whatever reason, has a chance to lead an exceptional life, he has no right to keep it to himself.

Offline Reboulet

  • Fan
  • *
  • Posts: 161
    • View Profile
Re: I need Scott-ch (lots of it); Baylor ADV
« Reply #35 on: January 21, 2016, 09:08:11 AM »
I only watched the last 8 minutes. Am I correct in assuming that Baylor made an adjustment in their defense at the half, and we did not react to that change? Because our zone offense at the end of the game looked worse than a rec league.

Offline kso_FAN

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 29506
    • View Profile
Re: I need Scott-ch (lots of it); Baylor ADV
« Reply #36 on: January 21, 2016, 09:17:54 AM »
I only watched the last 8 minutes. Am I correct in assuming that Baylor made an adjustment in their defense at the half, and we did not react to that change? Because our zone offense at the end of the game looked worse than a rec league.

Yeah, but I'd say the main adjustment they made was playing harder.

Offline ksupamplemousse

  • Elevate
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 4527
    • View Profile
Re: I need Scott-ch (lots of it); Baylor ADV
« Reply #37 on: January 21, 2016, 09:24:24 AM »
I only watched the last 8 minutes. Am I correct in assuming that Baylor made an adjustment in their defense at the half, and we did not react to that change? Because our zone offense at the end of the game looked worse than a rec league.

Yeah, but I'd say the main adjustment they made was playing harder.

...and not even 110% or anything, just harder than like the 50% they were giving in the first half. It didn't take much defensive effort to completely take us out of our game.
This is who I am...I have no problem crying. - Jerome Tang

Offline CNS

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 36688
  • I'm Athletes
    • View Profile
Re: I need Scott-ch (lots of it); Baylor ADV
« Reply #38 on: January 21, 2016, 09:26:03 AM »
Super frustrated with Wes.  45 minutes and had 7 turnovers and only one PF.  Feel like he is trying too hard on offense and not hard enough on defense...

I looked up from my book periodically last night and it seemed that every time I did Wes was forcing a drive only to shotgun the ball at DJamer's shin or force up an airball layup.

Book is pretty good, though.

Offline CNS

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 36688
  • I'm Athletes
    • View Profile
Re: I need Scott-ch (lots of it); Baylor ADV
« Reply #39 on: January 21, 2016, 09:29:16 AM »
I liked the play where they would try the backdoor oop and just launch it out of bounds or slam is off the backboard.

Oh man, that one series where Prince stole our lazy ass pass at the top of the key, then had his pocket picked at the top of their key, only for our guy to throw it 2/3rds of the court slightly over Dumbass Walkon's head without his reaction, and immediately between Claws and DJamer(?) with out either of them reacting, and the ball not even touching the ground or anyone until it was a few feet out of bounds. 

 :love:

As Brucey as it gets.

Offline AppleJack

  • AppleJack
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 6337
  • How are you doing today?
    • View Profile
Re: I need Scott-ch (lots of it); Baylor ADV
« Reply #40 on: January 21, 2016, 09:30:29 AM »
I LOL'd at that play. It's pretty great not caring.
When one person, for whatever reason, has a chance to lead an exceptional life, he has no right to keep it to himself.

Offline kso_FAN

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 29506
    • View Profile
Re: I need Scott-ch (lots of it); Baylor ADV
« Reply #41 on: January 21, 2016, 09:38:14 AM »
Its probably better for me not to watch and just run the stats. I can't watch and not care and I'm no good at sarcastic cynicism. :sigh:

Offline CHONGS

  • Master of the Atom
  • Administrator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 19428
    • View Profile
    • goEMAW.com
Re: I need Scott-ch (lots of it); Baylor ADV
« Reply #42 on: January 21, 2016, 09:40:23 AM »
If the scoreboard measured hearts instead of points, this KSU team would be in the top ten for sure.

The wins will come, just wait until all of piece Burce is putting together line up.

Offline pvegs

  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 2198
    • View Profile
Re: I need Scott-ch (lots of it); Baylor ADV
« Reply #43 on: January 21, 2016, 09:47:40 AM »
If the scoreboard measured hearts instead of points, this KSU team would be in the top ten for sure.

The wins will come, just wait until all of piece Burce is putting together line up.

that's why my 4 moral victories to 1 real victory scale makes so much sense. by that model, we'd have 1.75 more wins by now and be right around the bubble.

Offline ksupamplemousse

  • Elevate
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 4527
    • View Profile
Re: I need Scott-ch (lots of it); Baylor ADV
« Reply #44 on: January 21, 2016, 09:56:36 AM »
If the scoreboard measured hearts instead of points, this KSU team would be in the top ten for sure.

The wins will come, just wait until all of piece Burce is putting together line up.

that's why my 4 moral victories to 1 real victory scale makes so much sense. by that model, we'd have 1.75 more wins by now and be right around the bubble.

ADJC should call the committee and see if we can get that rule instituted this year, because next year it will be too late, since we'll be winning a national championship and all  :gocho:
This is who I am...I have no problem crying. - Jerome Tang

Offline Dr Rick Daris

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 23383
    • View Profile
Re: I need Scott-ch (lots of it); Baylor ADV
« Reply #45 on: January 21, 2016, 10:05:52 AM »
this staff has only had four years and nobody could have predicted foster becoming so selfish plus all his drug issues. he was the centerpiece that the staff was building around and he let all of us down. it will take some time to dig out of the mess he put us all in, but we sure seem to be headed in the right direction.

Online michigancat

  • Contributor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 53786
  • change your stupid avatar.
    • View Profile
Re: I need Scott-ch (lots of it); Baylor ADV
« Reply #46 on: January 21, 2016, 10:11:58 AM »
Wes just isn't very good at offense

Offline AppleJack

  • AppleJack
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 6337
  • How are you doing today?
    • View Profile
Re: I need Scott-ch (lots of it); Baylor ADV
« Reply #47 on: January 21, 2016, 10:24:00 AM »
Is Wes better/worse than Dom?

When one person, for whatever reason, has a chance to lead an exceptional life, he has no right to keep it to himself.

Online michigancat

  • Contributor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 53786
  • change your stupid avatar.
    • View Profile
Re: I need Scott-ch (lots of it); Baylor ADV
« Reply #48 on: January 21, 2016, 10:43:19 AM »
Is Wes better/worse than Dom?



That's a pretty good comparison actually. Wes is probably better at offense but Dom was better at defense.

Offline AppleJack

  • AppleJack
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 6337
  • How are you doing today?
    • View Profile
Re: I need Scott-ch (lots of it); Baylor ADV
« Reply #49 on: January 21, 2016, 10:45:16 AM »
Is Wes better/worse than Dom?



That's a pretty good comparison actually. Wes is probably better at offense but Dom was better at defense.

I was gonna say the opposite. Dom could actually make a J every once in a while.
When one person, for whatever reason, has a chance to lead an exceptional life, he has no right to keep it to himself.