I have no presidential candidate to vote for and spanish bad word thread

[wetwillie]

Good point,  better than a 99% trump score.  I thought me and Rubio were homies tho.

[gatoveintisiete]

That was a fun quiz

[Rage Against the McKee]

Good point,  better than a 99% trump score.  I thought me and Rubio were homies tho.

Rubio is pretty similar to Jeb.

[MakeItRain]

I was tied for Bernie and Rand Paul  on that isidewith quiz, which makes tons of sense

It makes plenty of sense, Bernie is an independent and Rand pretty much is. They share nearly the identical views on foreign policy, national security, drugs, and sentencing reform. Socially they're nearly the same person, I'm guessing you weighted those issues heavier.

[Cartierfor3]

I was tied for Bernie and Rand Paul  on that isidewith quiz, which makes tons of sense

It makes plenty of sense, Bernie is an independent and Rand pretty much is. They share nearly the identical views on foreign policy, national security, drugs, and sentencing reform. Socially they're nearly the same person, I'm guessing you weighted those issues heavier.

Its like when Ron Paul and Dennis Kucinich were BFFs

[Trim]

Presidential candidates should be entire teams early.  I don't believe that any of these candidates are solely competent in all the areas a president has to know.  The candidates should have a known economy guy, military guy, social issues guy, etc. (and (or gal!) after each one), that are vetted nearly as much as the main candidate and who get out and speak to their thing.  I'd be fine with a president who doesn't even know that much about any one thing if he has a dream team of people who'd whip ass at their thing.

[Mrs. Gooch]

Presidential candidates should be entire teams early.  I don't believe that any of these candidates are solely competent in all the areas a president has to know.  The candidates should have a known economy guy, military guy, social issues guy, etc. (and (or gal!) after each one), that are vetted nearly as much as the main candidate and who get out and speak to their thing.  I'd be fine with a president who doesn't even know that much about any one thing if he has a dream team of people who'd whip ass at their thing.

Aren't those called cabinet members?

[star seed 7]

What if two dudes want to use the same war dude

[Trim]

Presidential candidates should be entire teams early.  I don't believe that any of these candidates are solely competent in all the areas a president has to know.  The candidates should have a known economy guy, military guy, social issues guy, etc. (and (or gal!) after each one), that are vetted nearly as much as the main candidate and who get out and speak to their thing.  I'd be fine with a president who doesn't even know that much about any one thing if he has a dream team of people who'd whip ass at their thing.

Aren't those called cabinet members?

I want the candidates to have them all picked out and on the bus tours right now (gonna need a bigger bus), and those people saying what they're going to try to do on their respective subjects.

My guess is that as it is, the candidates have experts in their camps writing up answers for them and giving them crash courses on foreign countries and stuff.  I'd rather it not be a contest of who can memorize and regurgitate the smoothest, and instead to actually see the people who are coming up with it.

[Trim]

What if two dudes want to use the same war dude

War dude will have hella leverage in who gets his services.

[Mrs. Gooch]

So Michael Bloomberg might be running....

[MakeItRain]

So Michael Bloomberg might be running....

Cool, I'm sure the 26 votes he'll get will really shake things up.

[steve dave]

if it's trump and sanders there is going to be a massive amount of voters who bloomberg would be an option for. still hoping there is some sort of joe biden miracle run.

[MakeItRain]

if it's trump and sanders there is going to be a massive amount of voters who bloomberg would be an option for.

Until people find out that he's simply an establishment democrat. Help me to understand how he is politically different than Hillrod? He's a democrat that wants to hold his own money.

[star seed 7]

I don't think most people's issue with Hillary is her political views

[steve dave]

[steve dave]

[sonofdaxjones]

The man loves war and guns . . . very electable.

[Rage Against the McKee]

if it's trump and sanders there is going to be a massive amount of voters who bloomberg would be an option for.

Until people find out that he's simply an establishment democrat. Help me to understand how he is politically different than Hillrod? He's a democrat that wants to hold his own money.

In that scenario, Hillrod wouldn't be an option.

[MakeItRain]

I don't think most people's issue with Hillary is her political views

People who would ever even consider voting for her don't care about those damn emails. That stuff matters most to people who would never consider her anyway

if it's trump and sanders there is going to be a massive amount of voters who bloomberg would be an option for.

Until people find out that he's simply an establishment democrat. Help me to understand how he is politically different than Hillrod? He's a democrat that wants to hold his own money.

In that scenario, Hillrod wouldn't be an option.

Right she wouldn't be an option because her platform was already rejected by the democratic voters. If independents truly cared about Bloomberg's views then they would caucus for Hillary and vote for her in primaries. There is no mistaking that politically they are eerily similar. I would like to think that people would say "oh look an independent" and blindly pull the lever for him.

[420seriouscat69]

I liked that quiz, until it told me that I'm pretty much obsessed with Trump's views. 

[CNS]

I don't  get why the email issue isn't/wouldn't be a problem.  It shows a big lack of judgment and an obvious choice by her to put her own ability to control what info of hers she can above national security.

[john "teach me how to" dougie]

I don't  get why the email issue isn't/wouldn't be a problem.  It shows a big lack of judgment and an obvious choice by her to put her own ability to control what info of hers she can above national security.

Didn't she delete a bunch of emails early on in the investigation? I think her motives were much more about hiding her communications with regard to FISA under the guise of convenience. She knew what she was doing.

[MakeItRain]

It's not a big deal because her supporters don't think that it is, it won't cost her a single vote. It's the Jeremiah Wright bullshit all over again. The Democrats have learned things since getting Willie Horton'd and Swift Boated.

[steve dave]

It's not a big deal because her supporters don't think that it is, it won't cost her a single vote. It's the Jeremiah Wright bullshit all over again. The Democrats have learned things since getting Willie Horton'd and Swift Boated.

this is a good description of the situation