Bernie's viability is in some heads I see.
Honestly, I thought going after Wall Street would be a bi-partisan issue. I thought if a candidate wanted to do that 90-95 percent of the voters would get behind that candidate. I was wrong. Bernie has faults, don't get me wrong, but income inequality is my biggest concern and it's his platform. The other candidates fail to bring much of anything, besides xenophobia, to the table. Therefore it's write-in Ken Griffey Jr. or vote Bernie.
Ok. Let's start with "reigning in Wall Street." I agree, but the conservative approach is to stop the crony capitalism of bailouts and subsidies. By contrast, socialists want to pick the winners and losers - and then tax them mercilessly. Conservatives have the better approach.
Next, "income equality." Trying to fix income equality has not worked out so well in socialist paradises. You might want to look into that. You might also want to consider this:

First, I do not think the image you posted is helpful. I think it's noted that I want to go after Wall Street. I also mentioned income inequality and I think I may be mixing the two. I am against income inequality but by no means am I talking about a welfare society.
You say that you agree with "reigning in Wall Street." I favor capitalism. I too believe it has helped make this country great. However, I think it has gotten out of control. See LIBOR, Countrywide, and breaking up the banks. FYI breaking up the banks isn't complicated. Jamie Dimon just wants to use American citizens as collateral if his investments fall through.
Finally, and my main point, I want these jack wagons arrested. The countrywide ass clowns should be arrested. The SEC should prosecute, instead of settling in court they should get a verdict. America paid for the bailout and the elites (and others) profited big time on it. If you get jail for peeing in public you sure as hell should get hell for millions losing their jobs and tens of thousands if not hundreds of thousands losing their homes.