1, 2, Bernie's coming for you...

[K-S-U-Wildcats!]

This is one of the great intellectual disconnects of libtardism. With all the evidence of government incompetence and corruption, they want to give them greater control?

[K-S-U-Wildcats!]

This one is my favorite.

[Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!)]

Socialism is a libtard code word for autocratic (practically theocratic) dictatorship.

[bucket]

This is one of the great intellectual disconnects of libtardism. With all the evidence of government incompetence and corruption, they want to give them greater control?

Your first image didn't load so I'm only commenting on the second. The people hold government accountable (believe it or not). The government hold the elite accountable (believe it or not). What's wrong with wanting government officials to keep them in check? What's wrong with not wanting great recessions and paying for bailouts?

[wetwillie]

Bernie's viability is in some heads I see. 

[bucket]

Bernie's viability is in some heads I see.

Honestly, I thought going after Wall Street would be a bi-partisan issue. I thought if a candidate wanted to do that 90-95 percent of the voters would get behind that candidate. I was wrong. Bernie has faults, don't get me wrong, but income inequality is my biggest concern and it's his platform. The other candidates fail to bring much of anything, besides xenophobia, to the table. Therefore it's write-in Ken Griffey Jr. or vote Bernie.

[MakeItRain]

KSUW, fsd is a sock do whatever, but can you please stop using the word tard? Please.

[MakeItRain]

Why Bernie is viable and why no one cares about this stupid "socialism" label.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/debbie-wasserman-schultz-primary_us_56aa4c4be4b00164892297e7

[Ptolemy]

Income Inequality? What incentive is there to achieve if govt forces everyone to make the same amount of money?

[sys]

racehorses get the same oats, win or lose.

[Ptolemy]

racehorses get the same oats, win or lose.

The winning horse gets access to much better poon than the losing horse does.

[sys]

The winning horse gets access to much better poon than the losing horse does.

well there you go.  that's why socialism works.

[MakeItRain]

Income Inequality? What incentive is there to achieve if govt forces everyone to make the same amount of money?

Don't be moronic, no one is advocating for that.

[Ptolemy]

Don't be moronic, no one is advocating for that.

If income inequality is a problem, the logical solution is equal income.

[chuckjames]

Income Inequality? What incentive is there to achieve if govt forces everyone to make the same amount of money?

And what good is capitalism if there are very few people that are uber rich and everyone else is poor? Ala the robber baron era of the late 19th century..early 20th century?

[CNS]

I am not for income equality.  I am for regulations of wall street, major campaign finance reform, ending large Corp spending on politics in general, and making ed much more accessible.  Ppl don't need the equal pay, but debt is what is killing the middle class.  Most of that is irresponsible spending, and I do not want the govt to address that, but they do need address the college debt.

[K-S-U-Wildcats!]

KSUW, fsd is a sock do whatever, but can you please stop using the word tard? Please.

The word is libtard. And it's a perfectly appropriate descriptor of the libtarded state of mind.

[chuckjames]

I am not for income equality.  I am for regulations of wall street, major campaign finance reform, ending large Corp spending on politics in general, and making ed much more accessible.  Ppl don't need the equal pay, but debt is what is killing the middle class.  Most of that is irresponsible spending, and I do not want the govt to address that, but they do need address the college debt.

A very reasonable position. IMO

[CNS]

I am a pretty reasonable person, chuck.

[Ptolemy]

And what good is capitalism if there are very few people that are uber rich and everyone else is poor? Ala the robber baron era of the late 19th century..early 20th century?

The Industrial Revolution led to the Roaring Twenties. Rockefeller, Carnegie, Ford, Vanderbilt, et.al. (the robber barons you demonize) did more to help poor people than you or I could ever dream of accomplishing. The US does not have has the highest GDP per capita among major countries in the world because of anything Bernie Sanders can visualize.

[chuckjames]

And what good is capitalism if there are very few people that are uber rich and everyone else is poor? Ala the robber baron era of the late 19th century..early 20th century?

The Industrial Revolution led to the Roaring Twenties. Rockefeller, Carnegie, Ford, Vanderbilt, et.al. (the robber barons you demonize) did more to help poor people than you or I could ever dream of accomplishing. The US does not have has the highest GDP per capita among major countries in the world because of anything Bernie Sanders can visualize.

And then what happened after the roaring 20s?

[K-S-U-Wildcats!]

Bernie's viability is in some heads I see.

Honestly, I thought going after Wall Street would be a bi-partisan issue. I thought if a candidate wanted to do that 90-95 percent of the voters would get behind that candidate. I was wrong. Bernie has faults, don't get me wrong, but income inequality is my biggest concern and it's his platform. The other candidates fail to bring much of anything, besides xenophobia, to the table. Therefore it's write-in Ken Griffey Jr. or vote Bernie.

Ok. Let's start with "reigning in Wall Street." I agree, but the conservative approach is to stop the crony capitalism of bailouts and subsidies. By contrast, socialists want to pick the winners and losers - and then tax them mercilessly. Conservatives have the better approach.

Next, "income equality." Trying to fix income equality has not worked out so well in socialist paradises. You might want to look into that. You might also want to consider this:

[CNS]

Lol.  Build some guilt libraries and lemy let's it slide.  Those guys created jobs, but the unions are the.only reason working working class isn't some peasant like portion of a.system similar to feudalism under those guys

[K-S-U-Wildcats!]

And what good is capitalism if there are very few people that are uber rich and everyone else is poor? Ala the robber baron era of the late 19th century..early 20th century?

The Industrial Revolution led to the Roaring Twenties. Rockefeller, Carnegie, Ford, Vanderbilt, et.al. (the robber barons you demonize) did more to help poor people than you or I could ever dream of accomplishing. The US does not have has the highest GDP per capita among major countries in the world because of anything Bernie Sanders can visualize.

And then what happened after the roaring 20s?

This happened. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Smoot–Hawley_Tariff_Act

Another wonderful example of government management of the economy.

[Ptolemy]

I am not for income equality.  I am for regulations of wall street, major campaign finance reform, ending large Corp spending on politics in general, and making ed much more accessible.  Ppl don't need the equal pay, but debt is what is killing the middle class.  Most of that is irresponsible spending, and I do not want the govt to address that, but they do need address the college debt.

Why is the federal govt best equipped to regulate Wall Street? I am a corporation - 1 person. My corp pays taxes. My corp should have a say in how that money is spent. Agree with you on govt debt. That's why govt needs to be reduced in size severely, not increased as Sanders wants. College debt? We all have college debt, and it has always been monstrous. Get to work and pay it off like all of us did. When I got married I had my debt plus my wife's debt - which was multiples more than mine. We paid off every dime. Just do it.