You say hyperbole, but every post you make about a region of instability you link back to Obama. Sorry that is your post history. If you don't feel that way, be less of a shitty poster.
(another screed from EDN 
, and me linking everything to Obama is crap, but he has been in office for what, SEVEN years now?)To your point about captain obvs....well it's not from your posting. You never talk about colonialism, you never talk about the war in Iraq being the most recent cause for this regional instability (because you'd have to hop off that Republican crock you love so much).
(I mentioned Iraq earlier in this thread, and clandestine wars of aggression are just another form of colonialism, and it's absolutely irrefutable that the current SOS, the former SOS and the sitting VP were major proponents of the Iraq War and Hillary's husband tried to wag the dog with Iraq when he was president) And you sure as eff never talk about the regional players who are the root cause to the continued instability.
(I've talked about Saudi Arabia and others being engaged for a long time in many posts, but they're still by and large proxies of the United States and/or Western Intlligence agencies) You sure as eff don't talk about Turkey, a NATO ally running guns into ISIS against our wishes.
(I've talked about gun running to ISIS often and if you think it was done against our wishes, or U.S. weapons or at least U.S. shipped weapons aren't in the hands of ISIS either purposefully or by accident you're an utter whack-a-doodle) Why don't you talk about stuff like that, because it would utterly destroy your talking points of a world hegemon US, headed by Obama
(As Glenn Greenwald so succinctly said a few years back, the Obama Administration on some levels was and in some ways still is out neo-con'ing the neo-cons) running amok and blundering from conflict to conflict. None of those facts fit your narrative so you don't even ignore them, you put blinders on and viciously attack anyone who brings up relevant facts that check your points.
(total bullshit) You don't have an ounce of ideological credibility to discuss things because your narrative is informing your view, not the facts.
(laughable, you've been nothing but a constant apologist for all things Obama and all things Dem/Prog-Lib)Those facts that you conveniently ignore, are not part of a proglib agenda. They are part of what we call "truth" and I'm sorry that your agenda driven perspective is so blinded by anything that runs counter to your preconceptions that you must block it off as "proglib" (or whatever the neo right will call it next month). The fact that you "allude" to US and Western powers is the problem. There is nothing to allude to. It's part of your issues with the truth that there are other actors outside the US and the amorphous "allies"/everyone else. The facts that you "allude" to this shows how rough ridin' ignorant you are, when our "allies" are acting against American foreign policy. The fact is every time you homogenize "allies" it shows that you don't understand there are a eff load of countries in the region pursuing their own policy goals that run counter to ours. These facts can't fit into your narrative so you are ignoring them and failing to assimilate them. It's the same bullshit from the neo-right that got us mumped in Iraq to begin with because you are smoothing out details you find irrelevant at the cost of hundreds of thousands of lives, trillions of dollars, and the security of this nation. Stop and examine something that runs counter to your small world and expand your rough ridin' horizons.
(All Captain Obvious points understood a long time ago, the simple facts there is no regime change in Libya there is no real attempt at regime change in Syria, there is likely less destabilization in Yemen, and there is less propping up of Theological Dictatorships without the United States, not to mention the idiotic attempt to . . . STILL! To get the Muslim Brotherhood back at the table in Egypt, without the United States)Your points about Russia here make no sense. Anyone who understands policy knows that Russia is doing this for only their self interest and it has eff all to do with combating ISIS. It's semi related because they are starting a larger fire *here* so islamo fascism doesn't burn in their backyard in Chechnya or Georgia. It has more to do with rough ridin' with the "west" and you would know that if you payed attention to who they were attacking in the opening weeks of their operation. Instead you're too busy with your face in Putin's lap to look at what is going on around you. But that would require you fitting facts into your narrative that might eff up your anti-Obama agenda.
(I talked about Russia's self interests a long time ago on this board, you apparently weren't paying any attention)And the point about foxnews, is that their journalistic integrity is a solid as your reasoning. I love the "I barely even pay attention to Fox News" talking point though, it makes for a good laugh when you're spouting off their talking points week after week, see your prolific use of "proglib". But lets not belabor that point. You only get your news from sources fit your agenda. Fine and dandy you don't "pay attention" to foxnews. I'll away your next batch of talking points though. I'm sure they won't fit anything breitbart, fox, drudge, daily caller, weekly standard, or red state are putting out there.
(Again, you can't have this conversation with somebody who either doesn't pay any attention to what I've actually posted on this board and is such a hardcore apologist for all things Prog-Lib. I have repeatedly and continuously posted articles from media sources and entities that will never be discussed on Drudge, or Fox News . . . again, apparently you weren't paying any attention. Your re-hasing stuff I was talking about months, even years ago all because you simply cannot handle any criticism of the Obama Administration)
