Is Planned Hamburger more important than the entire good of America?

[Rage Against the McKee]

(Regardless of political affiliation)

Well, I'm assuming that republicans are more likely to be religious. I could be wrong though. I'm just saying it could make sense.

I quoted you to affirm your point. The assumption that Republicans are more likely to regularly attend church services is likely correct, so the next assumption that there are more republicans giving in church is reasonable. But many republicans won't concede that it's possible to be a democrat and to attend church. I still contend that the "fact" that Republicans give more is total crap and there's a reason why there's no concrete evidence of it being so.

Don't forget to consider that Republicans are also on the average much better off than Democrats and therefore have the means to even be able to give charitably.

Not really. More poor people are democrats, but there are just as many wealthy democrats as there are wealthy republicans.

http://www.people-press.org/2015/04/07/2014-party-identification-detailed-tables/

[catastrophe]

I also need a timeline point of clarification, but don't Christians believe Jesus was kicking it before Plato? How would he have any opinion about government?

Not sure if I understand the question, but Plato was way before Jesus. Many people think early Christian authors actually read Plato.

Yeah, Jesus lived within the Roman Empire.

Really? I did not know this, it's odd that this was so recent within the context of world history yet there is so much debate about what happened and what didn't.

Honestly for most records outside of super official government stuff, whether a given manuscript survives 2,000 years or 10,000 really just comes down to luck at some point.

I'm also pretty sure there was debate even at the time about what happened. In an era without any reliable recording methods other than letters, how do you think you'd react if someone swears to you they saw a guy rise from the dead a couple states over?

[ednksu]

(Regardless of political affiliation)

Well, I'm assuming that republicans are more likely to be religious. I could be wrong though. I'm just saying it could make sense.

I quoted you to affirm your point. The assumption that Republicans are more likely to regularly attend church services is likely correct, so the next assumption that there are more republicans giving in church is reasonable. But many republicans won't concede that it's possible to be a democrat and to attend church. I still contend that the "fact" that Republicans give more is total crap and there's a reason why there's no concrete evidence of it being so.

http://news.rice.edu/2012/05/31/liberals-versus-conservatives-how-politics-affects-charitable-giving/

[Emo EMAW]

(Regardless of political affiliation)

Well, I'm assuming that republicans are more likely to be religious. I could be wrong though. I'm just saying it could make sense.

I quoted you to affirm your point. The assumption that Republicans are more likely to regularly attend church services is likely correct, so the next assumption that there are more republicans giving in church is reasonable. But many republicans won't concede that it's possible to be a democrat and to attend church. I still contend that the "fact" that Republicans give more is total crap and there's a reason why there's no concrete evidence of it being so.

Don't forget to consider that Republicans are also on the average much better off than Democrats and therefore have the means to even be able to give charitably.

Not really. More poor people are democrats, but there are just as many wealthy democrats as there are wealthy republicans.

http://www.people-press.org/2015/04/07/2014-party-identification-detailed-tables/

If the number of people wealthy enough to give charitably is the same between parties, but one party is more likely to give because of some religious affiliation, then how could one ever conclude that the opposite party gives just as much?   

[Rage Against the McKee]

(Regardless of political affiliation)

Well, I'm assuming that republicans are more likely to be religious. I could be wrong though. I'm just saying it could make sense.

I quoted you to affirm your point. The assumption that Republicans are more likely to regularly attend church services is likely correct, so the next assumption that there are more republicans giving in church is reasonable. But many republicans won't concede that it's possible to be a democrat and to attend church. I still contend that the "fact" that Republicans give more is total crap and there's a reason why there's no concrete evidence of it being so.

Don't forget to consider that Republicans are also on the average much better off than Democrats and therefore have the means to even be able to give charitably.

Not really. More poor people are democrats, but there are just as many wealthy democrats as there are wealthy republicans.

http://www.people-press.org/2015/04/07/2014-party-identification-detailed-tables/

If the number of people wealthy enough to give charitably is the same between parties, but one party is more likely to give because of some religious affiliation, then how could one ever conclude that the opposite party gives just as much?   

Nobody concluded that.

[MakeItRain]

(Regardless of political affiliation)

Well, I'm assuming that republicans are more likely to be religious. I could be wrong though. I'm just saying it could make sense.

I quoted you to affirm your point. The assumption that Republicans are more likely to regularly attend church services is likely correct, so the next assumption that there are more republicans giving in church is reasonable. But many republicans won't concede that it's possible to be a democrat and to attend church. I still contend that the "fact" that Republicans give more is total crap and there's a reason why there's no concrete evidence of it being so.

Don't forget to consider that Republicans are also on the average much better off than Democrats and therefore have the means to even be able to give charitably.

 

[MakeItRain]

(Regardless of political affiliation)

Well, I'm assuming that republicans are more likely to be religious. I could be wrong though. I'm just saying it could make sense.

I quoted you to affirm your point. The assumption that Republicans are more likely to regularly attend church services is likely correct, so the next assumption that there are more republicans giving in church is reasonable. But many republicans won't concede that it's possible to be a democrat and to attend church. I still contend that the "fact" that Republicans give more is total crap and there's a reason why there's no concrete evidence of it being so.

http://news.rice.edu/2012/05/31/liberals-versus-conservatives-how-politics-affects-charitable-giving/

Jesus, I wonder how much time and money they wasted on that? I'm not sure it's possible to have a study confirm something that is more deeply rooted in common sense.

[114Hickory]

Jesus, I wonder how much time and money they wasted on that? I'm not sure it's possible to have a study confirm something that is more deeply rooted in common sense.


Yes, fascinating research.

[The Big Train]

hey KSUW we are complete human and always have been 

http://www.iflscience.com/health-and-medicine/ancient-viruses-are-hiding-within-your-dna

[renocat]

Planned Hamburger Vginatroopers are ruthless.  The California DOJ, a rabid democomrade, ordered special agents to raid the home of the guy who made the videos of the meat market.  They took all of his personal belongings.

[K-S-U-Wildcats!]

Planned Hamburger Vginatroopers are ruthless.  The California DOJ, a rabid democomrade, ordered special agents to raid the home of the guy who made the videos of the meat market.  They took all of his personal belongings.

CA AG Kamala Harris is running for Senate, and she needs "results" for her donor base. More thug government in action.

[star seed 7]

This thug has been caught breaking the law before, what did he do now?

[K-S-U-Wildcats!]

This thug has been caught breaking the law before, what did he do now?

If you really think people should be prosecuted for engaging in undercover journalism, you're even more of a brownshirt lemming than I thought. Seriously, troll, put aside your partisan bullshit and ask yourself - are these types of prosecutions good for exposing corruption?

[star seed 7]

Next time he exposes anything but his own lawbreaking will be the first

[star seed 7]

I'm going to expose ksuw's corruption by breaking the law and lying except,  crap, I can't find any corruption 

Hey guys when I did all that illegal crap I was just investigating so leave me alone! 

[TCUHornedFrog]

I don't understand the opposition to Planned Parenthood.  Women that get abortions are the best.  They don't ruin your life with kids.

[bucket]

This thug has been caught breaking the law before, what did he do now?

If you really think people should be prosecuted for engaging in undercover journalism, you're even more of a brownshirt lemming than I thought. Seriously, troll, put aside your partisan bullshit and ask yourself - are these types of prosecutions good for exposing corruption?

The Center for Medical Progress' videos are fabricated and edited in an effort to mislead the anti-abortion crowd. No corruption was "exposed."

[ednksu]

Man Lib7 is just crushing KSUW....not sure he even knows it.

[The Big Train]

KSUW won't even respond to me I'm crushing it so badly

[steve dave]

[CNS]

That is the least ugly cruz has ever looked.  That should be his new equivalent of his head shot.

Sent from my SM-G900T using Tapatalk

[Rage Against the McKee]

That is the least ugly cruz has ever looked.  That should be his new equivalent of his head shot.

Sent from my SM-G900T using Tapatalk

Clearly, he needs to grow a mustache.

[renocat]

I the Obama EEOC ruling on how defined sex.  Of course it contained gender gear shifting and gays, but listed pregnancy.  ????  Today HHS issued a that any medical facility or Dr. Recieving federal dollars through even medicaid and medicaid can't deny health services due to sex which includes pregnancy.  A dr. Or medical facility cannot deny performing an abortion to do so is sex discrimination, and the punative wrath of.planned hamburger storm troopers at.DOJ squeezing the life out of you.

[SkinnyBenny]

I the Obama EEOC ruling on how defined sex.  Of course it contained gender gear shifting and gays, but listed pregnancy.  ????  Today HHS issued a that any medical facility or Dr. Recieving federal dollars through even medicaid and medicaid can't deny health services due to sex which includes pregnancy.  A dr. Or medical facility cannot deny performing an abortion to do so is sex discrimination, and the punative wrath of.planned hamburger storm troopers at.DOJ squeezing the life out of you.

well said.

[renocat]

HIllary.  Yesterday called abortion Reproductive Justice.  Every woman should have unfettered access to an abortion; no.restrictions.  Where is the justice for.the.defenseless baby in the womb.  Oh I forgot, to these compassionate HMT women it ain't a.baby, its HAMBURGER.

Do we.really want.a.heartless and.ruthless person for.president?