0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Reminds me of OPjohn.
Stanford band tries way too hard to be edgy.
Quote from: Yard Dog on August 16, 2016, 08:02:55 AMQuote from: SkinnyBenny on August 16, 2016, 07:26:27 AMQuote from: Rage Against the McKee on August 15, 2016, 04:58:31 PMI thought Stanford's mascot was some stupid tree.the tree is incredible fwiwincredibly uglyMaybe I'm taking the bait, but isn't the tree considered the band's mascot?
Quote from: SkinnyBenny on August 16, 2016, 07:26:27 AMQuote from: Rage Against the McKee on August 15, 2016, 04:58:31 PMI thought Stanford's mascot was some stupid tree.the tree is incredible fwiwincredibly ugly
Quote from: Rage Against the McKee on August 15, 2016, 04:58:31 PMI thought Stanford's mascot was some stupid tree.the tree is incredible fwiw
I thought Stanford's mascot was some stupid tree.
Quote from: Rage Against the McKee on August 15, 2016, 04:58:31 PMI thought Stanford's mascot was some stupid tree.The actual mascot is the tree, but it's named for the color cardinal red. The mascot is not an official university mascot, tho.
Quote from: DOD Take 2 on August 15, 2016, 05:09:02 PMQuote from: Rage Against the McKee on August 15, 2016, 04:58:31 PMI thought Stanford's mascot was some stupid tree.The actual mascot is the tree, but it's named for the color cardinal red. The mascot is not an official university mascot, tho.This. Like Syracuse OrangeSent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Quote from: That_Guy on August 16, 2016, 12:24:34 PMQuote from: DOD Take 2 on August 15, 2016, 05:09:02 PMQuote from: Rage Against the McKee on August 15, 2016, 04:58:31 PMI thought Stanford's mascot was some stupid tree.The actual mascot is the tree, but it's named for the color cardinal red. The mascot is not an official university mascot, tho.This. Like Syracuse OrangeSent from my iPhone using Tapatalkexcept not like the syracuse orange because they're not named after a color or a fruit, or a tree
Seems kind of perv-y.
How is it insider if it's publicly posted?
depth chart is out! trey dishon and reggie walker starting. jones and silmon 1/2. zuber is 4th wr. coleman will not redshirt. pls more analysis from hfbiq!
Quote from: pvegs on August 30, 2016, 02:17:45 PMdepth chart is out! trey dishon and reggie walker starting. jones and silmon 1/2. zuber is 4th wr. coleman will not redshirt. pls more analysis from hfbiq!What? Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Quote from: That_Guy on August 30, 2016, 03:38:53 PMQuote from: pvegs on August 30, 2016, 02:17:45 PMdepth chart is out! trey dishon and reggie walker starting. jones and silmon 1/2. zuber is 4th wr. coleman will not redshirt. pls more analysis from hfbiq!What? Sent from my iPhone using TapatalkGuessing he means Sutton, and not that one of our coaches will not redshirt? No idea