0 Members and 5 Guests are viewing this topic.
I thought you were voting for GJ?
Quote from: Sundance»¤«Kid on August 17, 2016, 11:13:00 AMI thought you were voting for GJ?But the idiocy on this thread is still to amazing to pass up.
Quote from: sonofdaxjones on August 17, 2016, 11:16:03 AMQuote from: Sundance»¤«Kid on August 17, 2016, 11:13:00 AMI thought you were voting for GJ?But the idiocy on this thread is still to amazing to pass up.Fair enough. I'd focus on bashing Hillary and less on trying to make trump seem palatable. But you do you. Just makes it hard to follow your position to the casual observer.
via the most unethical of means.
Yep, getting advice from people in business is EXACTLY the same as owing political debts to a massive list of contributors to certain foundations and entities that pumped millions into personal banking accounts.
in the end, EMAW will always win.
Quote from: Sundance»¤«Kid on August 17, 2016, 11:19:56 AMQuote from: sonofdaxjones on August 17, 2016, 11:16:03 AMQuote from: Sundance»¤«Kid on August 17, 2016, 11:13:00 AMI thought you were voting for GJ?But the idiocy on this thread is still to amazing to pass up.Fair enough. I'd focus on bashing Hillary and less on trying to make trump seem palatable. But you do you. Just makes it hard to follow your position to the casual observer.I'm still trying to figure out how any thinking person would think Hilary was "palatable" on any conceivable level. She's easily one of the most despicable human beings/politicians of our time. The only thing she has going for her is a well oil political machine that's cleared every obstacle out of the way for her via the most unethical of means.
Quote from: sonofdaxjones on August 17, 2016, 11:22:50 AMQuote from: Sundance»¤«Kid on August 17, 2016, 11:19:56 AMQuote from: sonofdaxjones on August 17, 2016, 11:16:03 AMQuote from: Sundance»¤«Kid on August 17, 2016, 11:13:00 AMI thought you were voting for GJ?But the idiocy on this thread is still to amazing to pass up.Fair enough. I'd focus on bashing Hillary and less on trying to make trump seem palatable. But you do you. Just makes it hard to follow your position to the casual observer.I'm still trying to figure out how any thinking person would think Hilary was "palatable" on any conceivable level. She's easily one of the most despicable human beings/politicians of our time. The only thing she has going for her is a well oil political machine that's cleared every obstacle out of the way for her via the most unethical of means.right. and it would be nice if the GOP put forth any semblance of a decent candidate against her. instead we have the most absurd legitimate political candidate I can think of who is running an absolute trainwreck of a campaign. which is the point of this thread.
When it comes to trump, dax likes what he sees.
Quote from: libliblibliblibliblib on August 17, 2016, 11:47:16 AMWhen it comes to trump, dax likes what he sees. Come on admit you like him too.
Over the last two weeks, concerned members of Trump's inner circle plotted an intervention to try and convince Trump that he needed to mount a more traditional campaign with a more disciplined approach to attacking Hillary Clinton and appealing to swing voters.Trump heard them out and then staged a campaign intervention of his own in the opposite direction after concluding, as the campaign source recalled him saying, "the guys in New York don't know what they are doing.""This is him finally embracing the fact that he knows better than they do," the source concluded.