Author Topic: The Trump Candidacy (Read 441296 times)

wetwillie · « **Reply #1050 on:** February 09, 2016, 09:19:57 PM »

Quote from: mocat on February 09, 2016, 08:48:11 AM

1) that nope poster is amazing

2) he irl called Cruz a "pussy"

Can you link the video of him calling Ted Cruz a pussy?

mocat · « **Reply #1051 on:** February 09, 2016, 09:22:24 PM »

Cartierfor3 · « **Reply #1052 on:** February 09, 2016, 09:28:20 PM »

that's pretty funny.

mocat · « **Reply #1053 on:** February 09, 2016, 09:30:09 PM »

Irl idiocracy

wetwillie · « **Reply #1054 on:** February 09, 2016, 09:38:30 PM »

Oh, I thought you said he called Ted Cruz a pussy.

mocat · « **Reply #1055 on:** February 09, 2016, 09:45:23 PM »

Yeah i guess you're right he did not call ted cruz a pussy

bones129 · « **Reply #1056 on:** February 10, 2016, 12:44:12 AM »

This Trump guy just keeps winning.

chum1 · « **Reply #1057 on:** February 10, 2016, 06:13:29 AM »

I guess we're going to build a wall.

Cire · « **Reply #1058 on:** February 10, 2016, 06:21:40 AM »

We're gonna build a wall

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

wetwillie · « **Reply #1059 on:** February 10, 2016, 06:22:51 AM »

wonder if trump has a company in mind to build it

Emo EMAW · « **Reply #1060 on:** February 10, 2016, 08:33:38 AM »

He's actually looking quite presidential.

john "teach me how to" dougie · « **Reply #1061 on:** February 10, 2016, 08:49:37 AM »

Quote from: chum1 on February 10, 2016, 06:13:29 AM

I guess we're going to build a wall.

No, the Mexicans are building a wall.

This is how he gets out of actually doing it.

K-S-U-Wildcats! · « **Reply #1062 on:** February 10, 2016, 08:51:54 AM »

I thought we were building the wall, but Mexico was going to pay for it? Or maybe it's the Chinese.

Rage Against the McKee · « **Reply #1063 on:** February 10, 2016, 09:28:35 AM »

Maybe he plans on hiring illegals to build the wall, and then deporting them when it comes time to pay.

CNS · « **Reply #1064 on:** February 10, 2016, 09:35:14 AM »

Quote from: K-S-U-Wildcats! on February 10, 2016, 08:51:54 AM

I thought we were building the wall, but Mexico was going to pay for it? Or maybe it's the Chinese.

Yep, it's this, except the China part. We are tearing up the TPP but making China pay for the shredding service.

ShellShock · « **Reply #1065 on:** February 10, 2016, 09:57:14 AM »

Guys, with Bernie gaining support, it's even better for our guy Donald!

Nobody is actually crazy enough to elect Bernie the socialist in the general election.

K-S-U-Wildcats! · « **Reply #1066 on:** February 10, 2016, 10:05:28 AM »

Bernie is not going to win the nomination. It's not even going to be that close. He does great with white super libs (socialists) and college kids, and there are a lot of those in Iowa and NH. He's about to run into a buzz saw in South Carolina and then the rest of the SEC on Super Tuesday. Best hope is that he continues to damage Hillary and undermine her turnout in the general.

gatoveintisiete · « **Reply #1067 on:** February 10, 2016, 10:19:12 AM »

He seems to understand this, I could hear it in his speech last night talking about uniting behind the nominee. He really just wants to push the D's farther into wack a doodle land.

CNS · « **Reply #1068 on:** February 10, 2016, 11:39:51 AM »

The instant Bernie is out, Bloomie is in. Hill is a guarantee loser at this point, imo.

sys · « **Reply #1069 on:** February 10, 2016, 11:45:27 AM »

not sure that's true. i think he's looking at the candidates to see how much moderate/establishment space there is between them for him to occupy. would def. run against trump/sanders. would definitely sit it out against bush/clinton. hard decisions if there's one outsider candidate and one establishment candidate.

i can't even call clinton a guaranteed loser anymore. everyone running looks like a guaranteed loser, but someone has to win.

CNS · « **Reply #1070 on:** February 10, 2016, 11:54:27 AM »

Quote from: sys on February 10, 2016, 11:45:27 AM

not sure that's true. i think he's looking at the candidates to see how much moderate/establishment space there is between them for him to occupy. would def. run against trump/sanders. would definitely sit it out against bush/clinton. hard decisions if there's one outsider candidate and one establishment candidate.

i can't even call clinton a guaranteed loser anymore. everyone running looks like a guaranteed loser, but someone has to win.

Bold part is such a sadly true thing. I really hate it.

As for Bloomberg, I think that is fair. He should get in no matter who is still standing between Bernie and Hill. Dan Carlin's latest podcast put it pretty well, imo, Bernie isn't doing well because of his stance(not fully anyway), but because Hillary is such a bad choice for most of the moderates. I agree with that. He went on to say that if there was another woman in the election that wasn't slimy seeming, that she would be smoking Hill. I agree with that too. I don't think that other candidate has to be a woman. I think I could be Bloomberg. Someone who doesn't have the "socialist" tag on them and someone who isn't a slimeball with a huge issue in getting voters to trust them. The good thing for him is that he doesn't need to rush. He could step in at the last legally allowed moment and do pretty well, I bet.

sys · « **Reply #1071 on:** February 10, 2016, 12:00:38 PM »

yeah. there's no reason for him to get in until the end. keep that shiny new smell as long as possible.

ShellShock · « **Reply #1072 on:** February 10, 2016, 02:32:37 PM »

Quote from: CNS on February 10, 2016, 11:39:51 AM

The instant Bernie is out, Bloomie is in. Hill is a guarantee loser at this point, imo.

Both Bernie and Hill are guaranteed losers. I could see Bloomie making a fairly strong run as an independent.

Emo EMAW · « **Reply #1073 on:** February 11, 2016, 03:01:53 PM »

If Trump doesn't get the nomination, especially if he has "won" the nomination, do people think he won't continue to run?

CNS · « **Reply #1074 on:** February 11, 2016, 03:43:10 PM »

Oh, he def will. I hope this exact thing happens. Will be super fun when hill and rubio are nominees and trump and Bloomberg are independents.