0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Chip Brown ?@ChipBrownOBL'ville has been hoping for call from #Big12, but any moves by #Md and #Rutgers to #B10 not likely to change Big12's stance on 10 for now.
I hope we stay at 10 forever and ever.
The Dude of WV ?@theDudeofWVUCONN has notified the Big East it is leaving for the ACC.
Tuxedo Yoda @TuxedoYodaI have heard from my source connected with the U of Texas Ath Dept - MULTIPLE ACC SCHOOLS have reached out to the B12 within the past 5 days
Tuxedo Yoda @TuxedoYodaI emailed back "which ones" and his answer, "I don't need to tell you, you already know." Hello FSU, Clemson & Miami!
Notice the big 10 didn't add a second team with Maryland, rumor is they're after Texass & Georgia Tech.
I don't like it but there is indeed a strong benefit to having a conference big enough that everyone cannot play everyone else. It allows you to schedule it so you can almost be assured you will have multiple highly ranked teams in the rankings system (and therefore more teams in the playoffs now). The SEC has this down to an art.
Quote from: Chingon on November 19, 2012, 12:32:08 PMI don't like it but there is indeed a strong benefit to having a conference big enough that everyone cannot play everyone else. It allows you to schedule it so you can almost be assured you will have multiple highly ranked teams in the rankings system (and therefore more teams in the playoffs now). The SEC has this down to an art. Yeah. And really, a division format makes it far easier for someone at KSU's level to win a conference title. (At least I think - the two years of round-robin kind of suggest otherwise).
I think the FSU to the Big 12 for eleven teams idea sounds pretty good. They should do that.
Anyone want to sum up the past 895 pages for me? TIA.
Quote from: michigancat on November 19, 2012, 12:33:21 PMQuote from: Chingon on November 19, 2012, 12:32:08 PMI don't like it but there is indeed a strong benefit to having a conference big enough that everyone cannot play everyone else. It allows you to schedule it so you can almost be assured you will have multiple highly ranked teams in the rankings system (and therefore more teams in the playoffs now). The SEC has this down to an art. Yeah. And really, a division format makes it far easier for someone at KSU's level to win a conference title. (At least I think - the two years of round-robin kind of suggest otherwise).The division format makes it easier if you aren't the best team. It's harder if you are.
Quote from: Nuts Kicked on November 19, 2012, 01:07:00 PMQuote from: michigancat on November 19, 2012, 12:33:21 PMQuote from: Chingon on November 19, 2012, 12:32:08 PMI don't like it but there is indeed a strong benefit to having a conference big enough that everyone cannot play everyone else. It allows you to schedule it so you can almost be assured you will have multiple highly ranked teams in the rankings system (and therefore more teams in the playoffs now). The SEC has this down to an art. Yeah. And really, a division format makes it far easier for someone at KSU's level to win a conference title. (At least I think - the two years of round-robin kind of suggest otherwise).The division format makes it easier if you aren't the best team. It's harder if you are.How many times has Texas really been the best team in the last 17 seasons?Three times? 2005, 2008, 2009? Am I missing any years?