0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Hard to believe the Big 12 dies tomorrow.
KU is right on par with Notre Dame ... when it comes to adding additional conference revenue
Beer pro tip: never drink anything other than BL, coors, pbr, maybe a few others that I'm forgetting
Quote from: Nuts Kicked on September 18, 2011, 11:00:13 PMQuote from: Panjandrum on September 18, 2011, 10:05:48 PMQuote from: ew2x4 on September 18, 2011, 09:57:24 PMI threw us in the SEC. But still. I don't think the SEC or the Big Ten will get teams they don't reaaaaaaaaaaaaaally want. Us included. Not sure. If you're Mike Slive, and this is about securing the best deals for your league, etc., you can really screw the Big Ten by taking the three of us. Just look at what the landscape is ultimately reduced to.The Big Ten will be left with no hope of ever getting to an attractive sixteen should they ever need to have that happen. Ever.Or, you can split it up like this, and it looks like most sides end up winning.That's not true at all. The Big Ten could just sit at 12 and all the 16 team conferences would be screwed by having to pay welfare revenue money to at least 5-6 teams while the Big 10 teams just get rich. If the Big 10 doesn't expand, there is no playoff and all the other conferences get caught with their dicks in their hands.Yeah...that would be true, if all of this conf expansion crap was happening organically. However, at this point, I'm fairly sure that someone (espn) is behind the scenes telling everyone that a playoff is coming so it's time to get into a 16 team conference. There's just no way that everyone is acting so irrationally without a puppet-master.
Quote from: Panjandrum on September 18, 2011, 10:05:48 PMQuote from: ew2x4 on September 18, 2011, 09:57:24 PMI threw us in the SEC. But still. I don't think the SEC or the Big Ten will get teams they don't reaaaaaaaaaaaaaally want. Us included. Not sure. If you're Mike Slive, and this is about securing the best deals for your league, etc., you can really screw the Big Ten by taking the three of us. Just look at what the landscape is ultimately reduced to.The Big Ten will be left with no hope of ever getting to an attractive sixteen should they ever need to have that happen. Ever.Or, you can split it up like this, and it looks like most sides end up winning.That's not true at all. The Big Ten could just sit at 12 and all the 16 team conferences would be screwed by having to pay welfare revenue money to at least 5-6 teams while the Big 10 teams just get rich. If the Big 10 doesn't expand, there is no playoff and all the other conferences get caught with their dicks in their hands.
Quote from: ew2x4 on September 18, 2011, 09:57:24 PMI threw us in the SEC. But still. I don't think the SEC or the Big Ten will get teams they don't reaaaaaaaaaaaaaally want. Us included. Not sure. If you're Mike Slive, and this is about securing the best deals for your league, etc., you can really screw the Big Ten by taking the three of us. Just look at what the landscape is ultimately reduced to.The Big Ten will be left with no hope of ever getting to an attractive sixteen should they ever need to have that happen. Ever.Or, you can split it up like this, and it looks like most sides end up winning.
I threw us in the SEC. But still. I don't think the SEC or the Big Ten will get teams they don't reaaaaaaaaaaaaaally want. Us included. Not sure.
Quote from: KCFDcat on September 18, 2011, 11:04:39 PMyeah, if texas and OU go to PAC, they won. USC, UCLA, Stanford, UT, OU. if this is true they're doing it rightwould they have an excuse for no one caring about pacific coast football than?
yeah, if texas and OU go to PAC, they won. USC, UCLA, Stanford, UT, OU. if this is true they're doing it right
O/U on the percent drop in enrollment if/when we get "left out"?I'm saying 10-15%, this is being realistic.
Huh? So the pac is screwed by adding Texas and OU? No
Quote from: kim carnes on September 18, 2011, 11:02:34 PMHuh? So the pac is screwed by adding Texas and OU? NoThey are screwed by adding OSU, Tech, Colorado, and Utah.
Quote from: Nuts Kicked on September 18, 2011, 11:11:35 PMQuote from: kim carnes on September 18, 2011, 11:02:34 PMHuh? So the pac is screwed by adding Texas and OU? NoThey are screwed by adding OSU, Tech, Colorado, and Utah.Would take OSU off that list. But, if this thing does go to 16 team conferences, Larry Scott has to be kicking himself over CU and Utah.
Quote from: ArchE_Cat on September 18, 2011, 11:14:51 PMQuote from: Nuts Kicked on September 18, 2011, 11:11:35 PMQuote from: kim carnes on September 18, 2011, 11:02:34 PMHuh? So the pac is screwed by adding Texas and OU? NoThey are screwed by adding OSU, Tech, Colorado, and Utah.Would take OSU off that list. But, if this thing does go to 16 team conferences, Larry Scott has to be kicking himself over CU and Utah.adding UT, OSU, and OU more than make up for them. it's like not sleeping with a hot chick because she has an ugly friend that wants to watch.
Quote from: KCFDcat on September 18, 2011, 11:17:16 PMQuote from: ArchE_Cat on September 18, 2011, 11:14:51 PMQuote from: Nuts Kicked on September 18, 2011, 11:11:35 PMQuote from: kim carnes on September 18, 2011, 11:02:34 PMHuh? So the pac is screwed by adding Texas and OU? NoThey are screwed by adding OSU, Tech, Colorado, and Utah.Would take OSU off that list. But, if this thing does go to 16 team conferences, Larry Scott has to be kicking himself over CU and Utah.adding UT, OSU, and OU more than make up for them. it's like not sleeping with a hot chick because she has an ugly friend that wants to watch. I don't think it does unless all the other remaining BCS conferences go to 16. OSU is just KSU with an oil baron donor who will be dead in 10 years.
OSU has a much better in-state buddy than we do.
Should Texas have second thoughts and decide not to seek admission to the Pac-12 Conference highly unlikely that league would be willing to invite Kansas and Kansas State to join, along with Oklahoma and Oklahoma State.
Quote from: theKSU on September 18, 2011, 11:21:47 PMOSU has a much better in-state buddy than we do. Yeah, that's great news for OSU, not so great news for the PAC. The Big 10 teams could really take a lion's share of tv revenue by letting all the other conferences set up for a playoff that never happens.
Quote from: Nuts Kicked on September 18, 2011, 11:23:54 PMQuote from: theKSU on September 18, 2011, 11:21:47 PMOSU has a much better in-state buddy than we do. Yeah, that's great news for OSU, not so great news for the PAC. The Big 10 teams could really take a lion's share of tv revenue by letting all the other conferences set up for a playoff that never happens.for as big as their conference is and for the vision they have 14 schools is stupid. Osu and tech make a ton of sense.