Author Topic: You think it can't get worse, but the wEERiness grows; WVU ADV (Read 9883 times)

Cire · « **Reply #25 on:** February 11, 2015, 09:00:59 PM »

Totally a wooly vs Iowa st or Colorado game circa 2005

kso_FAN · « **Reply #26 on:** February 11, 2015, 09:01:44 PM »

Quote from: michigancat on February 11, 2015, 08:54:42 PM

This is a Wooly season. As in the team sucks

This.

To be fair, a Wooly team usually wouldn't come all the way back to lead, but get only within a possession.

Honestly, this was almost worse.

michigancat · « **Reply #27 on:** February 11, 2015, 09:02:25 PM »

Quote from: ksu_FAN on February 11, 2015, 09:01:44 PM

Quote from: michigancat on February 11, 2015, 08:54:42 PM
This is a Wooly season. As in the team sucks

This.

To be fair, a Wooly team usually wouldn't come all the way back to lead, but get only within a possession.

Honestly, this was almost worse.

To REALLY be fair, compare kenpom rankings

michigancat · « **Reply #28 on:** February 11, 2015, 09:05:40 PM »

Quote from: michigancat on February 11, 2015, 09:02:25 PM

Quote from: ksu_FAN on February 11, 2015, 09:01:44 PM

Quote from: michigancat on February 11, 2015, 08:54:42 PM
This is a Wooly season. As in the team sucks

This.

To be fair, a Wooly team usually wouldn't come all the way back to lead, but get only within a possession.

Honestly, this was almost worse.
To REALLY be fair, compare kenpom rankings

Actually, that might not be fair, as this team is currently ranked below Wooly's last 4 teams. (although tonight's results may give us a positive bump)

kso_FAN · « **Reply #29 on:** February 11, 2015, 09:07:05 PM »

Yeah, we're freaking bad.

wetwillie · « **Reply #30 on:** February 11, 2015, 09:15:53 PM »

Beems was right, shooting a lot of threes is fools good. I'm glad we put the effort in to make our 2's.

Mixed-Nutz · « **Reply #31 on:** February 11, 2015, 09:18:06 PM »

Foster didn't play, season has been a mess. But i don't know how you see this game as negative if you keep everything relative.

michigancat · « **Reply #32 on:** February 11, 2015, 09:21:00 PM »

Quote from: Mixed-Nutz on February 11, 2015, 09:18:06 PM

Foster didn't play, season has been a mess. But i don't know how you see this game as negative if you keep everything relative.

it's definitely positive relative to the blowout loss to the worst team in the league. Which is great!

yoman · « **Reply #33 on:** February 11, 2015, 09:22:23 PM »

Quote from: Mixed-Nutz on February 11, 2015, 09:18:06 PM

Foster didn't play, season has been a mess. But i don't know how you see this game as negative if you keep everything relative.

pissclams · « **Reply #34 on:** February 11, 2015, 09:22:34 PM »

Quote from: Mixed-Nutz on February 11, 2015, 09:18:06 PM

Foster didn't play, season has been a mess. But i don't know how you see this game as negative if you keep everything relative.

anytime you lose, the game is a negative

when you fall to your worst conference record in a decade, it's a negative

when you suck, it's a negative

Mixed-Nutz · « **Reply #35 on:** February 11, 2015, 09:23:05 PM »

Quote from: michigancat on February 11, 2015, 09:21:00 PM

Quote from: Mixed-Nutz on February 11, 2015, 09:18:06 PM
Foster didn't play, season has been a mess. But i don't know how you see this game as negative if you keep everything relative.
it's definitely positive relative to the meltdown loss to the worst team in the league. Which is great!

pissclams · « **Reply #36 on:** February 11, 2015, 09:23:52 PM »

were we more prepared for the press tonight? seems like we were. boom, positive

michigancat · « **Reply #37 on:** February 11, 2015, 09:24:10 PM »

Wait, what?

j rake · « **Reply #38 on:** February 11, 2015, 09:25:30 PM »

on the list of losses to get mad about, this one should rank near the bottom.

the WVU home loss was worse, the Texas Tech road loss was worse, the Texas home loss was worse, and every game in non-con was worse (except for Arizona). they had a 15% chance to win before the game, an 85% chance to win late in the game, and they choked - in large part because their best player is suspended.

k-state is, what, the seventh or eighth most talented team in the league? maybe worse without foster?

are you guys really expecting to win as 11-point underdogs on the road against a team coming off a disastrous loss without your best player with a far inferior team and a lesser coach?

great effort.

Cire · « **Reply #39 on:** February 11, 2015, 09:27:47 PM »

Jeffrey wooly rake everyone

j rake · « **Reply #40 on:** February 11, 2015, 09:28:16 PM »

wetwillie · « **Reply #41 on:** February 11, 2015, 09:30:55 PM »

Snyder killed our hoops program again, that bastard.

kso_FAN · « **Reply #42 on:** February 11, 2015, 09:34:01 PM »

Quote from: michigancat on February 11, 2015, 09:05:40 PM

Quote from: michigancat on February 11, 2015, 09:02:25 PM
To REALLY be fair, compare kenpom rankings
Actually, that might not be fair, as this team is currently ranked below Wooly's last 4 teams. (although tonight's results may give us a positive bump)

We moved up 9 spots!

renocat · « **Reply #43 on:** February 11, 2015, 09:43:29 PM »

Hot dang boys we are near last in the toughest league. Imagine being last in the MVC. Or worse being MiZZlosers. Foster will go berserk when he returns and life will be good again.

Clevey 2 Times · « **Reply #44 on:** February 11, 2015, 09:50:46 PM »

Guys, maybe my expectations are now so low, but I kinda watched that game and left thinking "good effort guys". I'm in a sad, depressing place with this team. I definitely thought we'd find a way to lose the game after taking the lead late. I definitely wasn't surprised that our team was clearly gassed and tired by the end of the game. All of that was in my mind, but I still left feeling kind of good. JFC.

I do feel bad for the players tonight for the first time all season. I think they did play hard, they're just not set up to succeed.

nicname · « **Reply #45 on:** February 11, 2015, 10:02:15 PM »

Quote from: ksu_FAN on February 11, 2015, 09:01:44 PM

Quote from: michigancat on February 11, 2015, 08:54:42 PM
This is a Wooly season. As in the team sucks

This.

To be fair, a Wooly team usually wouldn't come all the way back to lead, but get only within a possession.

Honestly, this was almost worse.

The constant yo-yo between 10 and 4 or so down was very Wooly.

nicname · « **Reply #46 on:** February 11, 2015, 10:06:16 PM »

The idea that this team is devoid of talent is crap (with an active Foster/ Malek). With what was lost and what was coming back a 7-10 seed in the NCAA and a top 4 finish in the conference was completely within reason.

For a variety of reasons this team has played well under expectations.

Cartierfor3 · « **Reply #47 on:** February 11, 2015, 10:09:36 PM »

I would argue Wooly's last 3 teams had more talent than this one.

Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) · « **Reply #48 on:** February 11, 2015, 10:22:27 PM »

Wooly couldn't even make the NIT you tards

Cartierfor3 · « **Reply #49 on:** February 11, 2015, 10:23:14 PM »

Quote from: Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) on February 11, 2015, 10:22:27 PM

Wooly couldn't even make the NIT you tards

This team won't either FSD.