BTW, traffic stats are pretty solid on fines being a better deterrence than warnings.
I tried googling that and didn't come up with anything. Link?
Sorry to use common sense here, but your auto insurance goes up with a ticket (moving violations), making the next one much more costly in insurance costs. "Warnings" are not going to do that.
Ok so no actual stats then? Just because a ticket is more costly than a warning doesn't mean that
receiving a ticket is any more or less likely to deter future infractions than receiving a warning. It's the
threat of getting a ticket that provides deterrence.
Besides, if "points on the license" is the desired deterrent, then why does virtually every city prosecutor allow you to plead down tickets to non moving violations for a higher fine? Almost seems like the cities are more interested in something else....