Author Topic: “The question would be how much you could read before they grabbed you"  (Read 20448 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline nicname

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 17048
  • Deal with it.
    • View Profile
Re: “The question would be how much you could read before they grabbed you"
« Reply #225 on: December 23, 2014, 01:14:56 PM »
From http://goEMAW.com/forum/index.php?topic=31565.125

The president has a list of people he wants to kill and dispatches remote control robots to kill them.

The CIA tortured tons of people, killed lots of people, spied on Congress when they did an investigative report and now refuses to allow the release of the report.

Most commodities are priced by cartels.

We live in an oligarchy.

 :Wha:
If there was a gif of nicname thwarting the attempted-flag-taker and then gesturing him to suck it, followed by motioning for all of Hilton Shelter to boo him louder, it'd be better than that auburn gif.

Offline michigancat

  • Contributor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 55958
  • change your stupid avatar.
    • View Profile
Re: “The question would be how much you could read before they grabbed you"
« Reply #226 on: December 23, 2014, 05:50:44 PM »


Let's hear it for atheists!  :thumbs:

Offline 8manpick

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 19148
  • A top quartile binger, poster, and friend
    • View Profile


Let's hear it for atheists!  :thumbs:
We already knew we were huge studs, but thanks. So much for relativistic morality!
:adios:

Offline john "teach me how to" dougie

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 7830
  • 1cat
    • View Profile
Re: “The question would be how much you could read before they grabbed you"
« Reply #228 on: December 23, 2014, 06:14:47 PM »
Those darn Maddow bloggers polling their friends again. :Wha:

Offline bubbles4ksu

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 5488
  • Son of Pete
    • View Profile
Re: “The question would be how much you could read before they grabbed you"
« Reply #229 on: December 23, 2014, 06:35:22 PM »
Those darn Maddow bloggers polling their friends again. :Wha:
that poll was done by the washington post and abc.

Offline slobber

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 12427
  • Gonna win 'em all!
    • View Profile
No religion is not defined very well. White Catholic kind of excludes a decent part of the population.


Gonna win 'em all!

Offline DQ12

  • PCKK7DC Survivor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *******
  • Posts: 22786
  • #TeamChestHair
    • View Profile
Re: “The question would be how much you could read before they grabbed you"
« Reply #231 on: December 23, 2014, 08:07:47 PM »
oh wow, a whole 1,000 people were asked their opinion on the matter.  let's give it up for all 7 out of 13 athiests who thought torture was bad!  good post Rusty/8man/Bubs.

 :flush:


"You want to stand next to someone and not be able to hear them, walk your ass into Manhattan, Kansas." - [REDACTED]

Offline wetwillie

  • goEMAW Poster of the WEEK
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 32511
    • View Profile
Re: “The question would be how much you could read before they grabbed you"
« Reply #232 on: December 23, 2014, 08:08:10 PM »
They all look like a set of male genitals n balls.  Except the one on the right.  #stumpy
When the bullets are flying, that's when I'm at my best

Offline Kat Kid

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 20997
    • View Profile

oh wow, a whole 1,000 people were asked their opinion on the matter.  let's give it up for all 7 out of 13 athiests who thought torture was bad!  good post Rusty/8man/Bubs.

 :flush:

Not 100% sure you understand sampling.

Offline K-S-U-Wildcats!

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 10040
    • View Profile
Re: “The question would be how much you could read before they grabbed you"
« Reply #234 on: December 23, 2014, 09:48:31 PM »
The "no religion" crowd sees a moral equivalency between intentionally slaughtering civilians in the most barbaric ways imaginable and harshly interrogating suspected terrorists to prevent future attacks? Well that's just shocking.
I've said it before and I'll say it again, K-State fans could have beheaded the entire KU team at midcourt, and K-State fans would be celebrating it this morning.  They are the ISIS of Big 12 fanbases.

Offline Kat Kid

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 20997
    • View Profile
Re: “The question would be how much you could read before they grabbed you"
« Reply #235 on: December 23, 2014, 10:48:08 PM »
The "no religion" crowd sees a moral equivalency between intentionally slaughtering civilians in the most barbaric ways imaginable and harshly interrogating suspected terrorists to prevent future attacks? Well that's just shocking.

I don't think that was the poll question.  But my answer would be they aren't morally equivalent.

Offline K-S-U-Wildcats!

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 10040
    • View Profile
Re: “The question would be how much you could read before they grabbed you"
« Reply #236 on: December 23, 2014, 11:06:12 PM »
The "no religion" crowd sees a moral equivalency between intentionally slaughtering civilians in the most barbaric ways imaginable and harshly interrogating suspected terrorists to prevent future attacks? Well that's just shocking.

I don't think that was the poll question.  But my answer would be they aren't morally equivalent.

But that's what it really boils down to in most people's minds.
I've said it before and I'll say it again, K-State fans could have beheaded the entire KU team at midcourt, and K-State fans would be celebrating it this morning.  They are the ISIS of Big 12 fanbases.

The Big Train

  • Guest


Let's hear it for atheists!  :thumbs:
We already knew we were huge studs, but thanks. So much for relativistic morality!

Offline DQ12

  • PCKK7DC Survivor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *******
  • Posts: 22786
  • #TeamChestHair
    • View Profile

oh wow, a whole 1,000 people were asked their opinion on the matter.  let's give it up for all 7 out of 13 athiests who thought torture was bad!  good post Rusty/8man/Bubs.

 :flush:

Not 100% sure you understand sampling.
4 people in this thread think that poll is a good and only 2 say it's bad. 

looks like the numbers are in folks, and 2/3 of americans say the poll is good!

 :flush:


"You want to stand next to someone and not be able to hear them, walk your ass into Manhattan, Kansas." - [REDACTED]

The Big Train

  • Guest
Re: “The question would be how much you could read before they grabbed you"
« Reply #239 on: December 24, 2014, 01:45:18 AM »
take a chill pill dlew, sheesh

Offline bubbles4ksu

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 5488
  • Son of Pete
    • View Profile
Idk why the god-fearing torture lover Dlew lumped me in with rusty and 8man. All I did was help dougie to understand.

Offline Kat Kid

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 20997
    • View Profile

The "no religion" crowd sees a moral equivalency between intentionally slaughtering civilians in the most barbaric ways imaginable and harshly interrogating suspected terrorists to prevent future attacks? Well that's just shocking.

I don't think that was the poll question.  But my answer would be they aren't morally equivalent.

But that's what it really boils down to in most people's minds.

Maybe.  It certainly is your moral calculus.  I don't think about it that way and we come to different conclusions so that makes sense to me.

Offline Kat Kid

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 20997
    • View Profile


oh wow, a whole 1,000 people were asked their opinion on the matter.  let's give it up for all 7 out of 13 athiests who thought torture was bad!  good post Rusty/8man/Bubs.

 :flush:

Not 100% sure you understand sampling.
4 people in this thread think that poll is a good and only 2 say it's bad. 

looks like the numbers are in folks, and 2/3 of americans say the poll is good!

 :flush:

Are you one of those people that thinks that if you aren't in a random sample you can add/subtract a percentage point on the result to correct for your opinion?

Offline 0.42

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 7746
  • pasghetti
    • View Profile
Re: “The question would be how much you could read before they grabbed you"
« Reply #243 on: December 24, 2014, 03:52:15 PM »
I can't tell if dlew is bbs'ing here or not

Offline DQ12

  • PCKK7DC Survivor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *******
  • Posts: 22786
  • #TeamChestHair
    • View Profile


oh wow, a whole 1,000 people were asked their opinion on the matter.  let's give it up for all 7 out of 13 athiests who thought torture was bad!  good post Rusty/8man/Bubs.

 :flush:

Not 100% sure you understand sampling.
4 people in this thread think that poll is a good and only 2 say it's bad. 

looks like the numbers are in folks, and 2/3 of americans say the poll is good!

 :flush:

Are you one of those people that thinks that if you aren't in a random sample you can add/subtract a percentage point on the result to correct for your opinion?
1000 people just seems really low.  Maybe it's not for these types of things.


"You want to stand next to someone and not be able to hear them, walk your ass into Manhattan, Kansas." - [REDACTED]

Offline DQ12

  • PCKK7DC Survivor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *******
  • Posts: 22786
  • #TeamChestHair
    • View Profile
Re: “The question would be how much you could read before they grabbed you"
« Reply #245 on: December 24, 2014, 08:24:32 PM »
And I'm just bitter because I was hoping that religious folks would be rooting for the right things.


"You want to stand next to someone and not be able to hear them, walk your ass into Manhattan, Kansas." - [REDACTED]

Offline Kat Kid

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 20997
    • View Profile
A sample size of ~2500 is typical for national polls in the US and that has a margin of error of around 2.5%.  I didn't look at the methodology or the sampling of the poll, but a sample of 1000 is plenty for almost anything.

Offline bubbles4ksu

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 5488
  • Son of Pete
    • View Profile

And I'm just bitter because I was hoping that religious folks would be rooting for the right things.
You owe me an apology for grouping me with 8man and cRusty.

Offline DQ12

  • PCKK7DC Survivor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *******
  • Posts: 22786
  • #TeamChestHair
    • View Profile
Re: “The question would be how much you could read before they grabbed you"
« Reply #248 on: December 24, 2014, 10:16:45 PM »
sorry bubs.  that was a low blow and completely unfounded.


"You want to stand next to someone and not be able to hear them, walk your ass into Manhattan, Kansas." - [REDACTED]

Offline Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!)

  • Racist Piece of Shit
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 18431
  • Kiss my ass and suck my dick
    • View Profile
    • I am the one and only Sugar Dick
Re: “The question would be how much you could read before they grabbed you"
« Reply #249 on: December 25, 2014, 12:53:05 PM »
The same atheists agreed droning was justified at a 71% clip.
goEMAW Karmic BBS Shepherd