0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
I've said it before and I'll say it again, K-State fans could have beheaded the entire KU team at midcourt, and K-State fans would be celebrating it this morning. They are the ISIS of Big 12 fanbases.
pat roberts has been in the senate the whole time obama has been presidentNOT GREG ORMAN
Put Greg Orman in the Senate and I bet bills start getting voted on. He solves problems every day in his business enterprises.
Quote from: puniraptor on October 03, 2014, 02:32:19 PMpat roberts has been in the senate the whole time obama has been presidentNOT GREG ORMANOk. Run that ad, I guess, but I don't get the logic. The problem isn't as much about incumbancy as it is about Harry Reid being in charge of the Senate since 2007. A vote for Orman is potentially a vote for Harry Reid and, by extension, Obama's agenda.
I like how all of the anti-Orman ads come out and say "He's not independent." It's basically acknowledging that being independent is better than being republican.
Quote from: K-S-U-Wildcats! on October 03, 2014, 02:54:55 PMQuote from: puniraptor on October 03, 2014, 02:32:19 PMpat roberts has been in the senate the whole time obama has been presidentNOT GREG ORMANOk. Run that ad, I guess, but I don't get the logic. The problem isn't as much about incumbancy as it is about Harry Reid being in charge of the Senate since 2007. A vote for Orman is potentially a vote for Harry Reid and, by extension, Obama's agenda.well MY problem is incumbency and YOUR problem is harry reid and my guy Greg is going to beat both those probem's asses
Quote from: puniraptor on October 03, 2014, 03:18:01 PMQuote from: K-S-U-Wildcats! on October 03, 2014, 02:54:55 PMQuote from: puniraptor on October 03, 2014, 02:32:19 PMpat roberts has been in the senate the whole time obama has been presidentNOT GREG ORMANOk. Run that ad, I guess, but I don't get the logic. The problem isn't as much about incumbancy as it is about Harry Reid being in charge of the Senate since 2007. A vote for Orman is potentially a vote for Harry Reid and, by extension, Obama's agenda.well MY problem is incumbency and YOUR problem is harry reid and my guy Greg is going to beat both those probem's assesSo you're pretty sure Orman is going to caucus with the GOP, huh? I'm not. He says he voted for Romney in 2012, so he's got that going for him, I guess, but he also voted for Obama in 2008, which indicates he's either a libtard or a complete dumbass.
Quote from: K-S-U-Wildcats! on October 03, 2014, 03:45:33 PMQuote from: puniraptor on October 03, 2014, 03:18:01 PMQuote from: K-S-U-Wildcats! on October 03, 2014, 02:54:55 PMQuote from: puniraptor on October 03, 2014, 02:32:19 PMpat roberts has been in the senate the whole time obama has been presidentNOT GREG ORMANOk. Run that ad, I guess, but I don't get the logic. The problem isn't as much about incumbancy as it is about Harry Reid being in charge of the Senate since 2007. A vote for Orman is potentially a vote for Harry Reid and, by extension, Obama's agenda.well MY problem is incumbency and YOUR problem is harry reid and my guy Greg is going to beat both those probem's assesSo you're pretty sure Orman is going to caucus with the GOP, huh? I'm not. He says he voted for Romney in 2012, so he's got that going for him, I guess, but he also voted for Obama in 2008, which indicates he's either a libtard or a complete dumbass.he said in a post on gE that he would caucus with the majority if he could beat the majority leaders ass and fire them
Orman put Harry Reid and Mitch McConnell on blast in his latest campaign ad, fwiw. There is some smoke there.