Author Topic: Hillary LOL (f/k/a Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch f/k/a Hillary 2016?)  (Read 335279 times)

0 Members and 6 Guests are viewing this topic.

Online CNS

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 36687
  • I'm Athletes
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #2075 on: August 11, 2016, 04:33:55 PM »
media  :curse:



http://observer.com/2016/08/wikileaks-reveals-mainstream-medias-coziness-with-clinton/

Quote
Some of the emails released show both CNN and Politico had articles pre-approved by the DNC prior to publication. Politico reporter Ken Vogel had DNC Communications Director Luis Miranda look over an article before he sent it to editors as part of an agreement. Politico has since called Vogel’s actions “a mistake.”

In May 2016, CNN published an anti-Sanders Op-Ed by Maria Cardona, who had had it pre-checked by the DNC before publication. In addition to the emails released by Wikileaks, The Intercept reported in May 2016 that they obtained emails showing CNN published an anti-Sanders Op-Ed ghostwritten by a lobbyist under Atlanta Mayor Kasim Reed’s name that they had received from a Clinton SuperPAC.

CNN’s Jake Tapper was also implicated. DNC staff discussed in emails, “if we want to offer Jake Tapper questions to ask us” after Tapper’s producer Jason Seher asked what DNC Hispanic Media Director Pablo Manriquez wanted to talk about on the show. Manriquez eventually resigned over DNC staff pushing him to break impartiality. Tapper insists the emails show no wrongdoing on his part, but the rhetoric among DNC staff makes it seem as though it was a standard procedure to write their own questions for CNN interviews.

Online john "teach me how to" dougie

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 7639
  • 1cat
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #2076 on: August 11, 2016, 04:59:42 PM »
media  :curse:



:lol: Man, this is a really low-rent video and a pretty transparent piece of crap. Nice chipmunk voices?

video quality  :curse:

Online wetwillie

  • goEMAW Poster of the WEEK
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 30432
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #2077 on: August 11, 2016, 05:06:27 PM »
Seeing poor execution of that really makes you appreciate the work that lib and bias do day in day out
When the bullets are flying, that's when I'm at my best

Online john "teach me how to" dougie

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 7639
  • 1cat
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #2078 on: August 11, 2016, 05:11:49 PM »
poor execution  :curse:

Offline Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!)

  • Racist Piece of Shit
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 18431
  • Kiss my ass and suck my dick
    • View Profile
    • I am the one and only Sugar Dick
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #2079 on: August 11, 2016, 07:47:33 PM »
Nancy Pelosi thinks we should sanction Russia for the DNC hacks. Like, what in the eff three-ways?  :lol:

That's your (libtards) house leader.  :ROFL:
goEMAW Karmic BBS Shepherd

Offline SkinnyBenny

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 16700
  • good time rock-n-roll plastic banana FM type
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #2080 on: August 11, 2016, 08:25:55 PM »
media  :curse:



:lol: Man, this is a really low-rent video and a pretty transparent piece of crap. Nice chipmunk voices?

video quality  :curse:

Yes, it's almost like any dipshit with $5 can go online and buy B-roll footage of analog TV snow, splice it into a bunch of CNN interview videos at really opportune times, and then claim that the feed went out because CNN sabotaged the interview.
"walking around mhk and crying in the rain because of love lost is the absolute purest and best thing in the world.  i hope i fall in love during the next few weeks and get my heart broken and it starts raining just to experience it one last time."   --Dlew12

Offline sonofdaxjones

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 53340
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #2081 on: August 11, 2016, 08:41:50 PM »
 :shakesfist: Russian Hackers  :shakesfist:

Offline Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!)

  • Racist Piece of Shit
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 18431
  • Kiss my ass and suck my dick
    • View Profile
    • I am the one and only Sugar Dick
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #2082 on: August 11, 2016, 08:50:56 PM »
Thr DNC is running with some c-list soviet spy james bond movie type narrative, and delusional benny is criticizing cnn criticism on the basis of video quality.  :lol:
goEMAW Karmic BBS Shepherd

Online john "teach me how to" dougie

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 7639
  • 1cat
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #2083 on: August 11, 2016, 09:43:14 PM »
media  :curse:



:lol: Man, this is a really low-rent video and a pretty transparent piece of crap. Nice chipmunk voices?

video quality  :curse:

Yes, it's almost like any dipshit with $5 can go online and buy B-roll footage of analog TV snow, splice it into a bunch of CNN interview videos at really opportune times, and then claim that the feed went out because CNN sabotaged the interview.


 :lol: the cuts were for dramatic effect, listen to the cnn commentators, reno.

Online Dugout DickStone

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 51510
  • BSPAC
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #2084 on: August 11, 2016, 09:48:42 PM »
Nancy Pelosi thinks we should sanction Russia for the DNC hacks. Like, what in the eff three-ways?  :lol:

That's your (libtards) house leader.  :ROFL:

Or, we could just sanction Russia by laughing at and destroying them at everything non stop while they pray their low grade oil is worth something so they can double their air craft carrier fleet by adding 1 more.

Offline Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!)

  • Racist Piece of Shit
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 18431
  • Kiss my ass and suck my dick
    • View Profile
    • I am the one and only Sugar Dick
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #2085 on: August 11, 2016, 10:53:40 PM »
media  :curse:



:lol: Man, this is a really low-rent video and a pretty transparent piece of crap. Nice chipmunk voices?

video quality  :curse:

Yes, it's almost like any dipshit with $5 can go online and buy B-roll footage of analog TV snow, splice it into a bunch of CNN interview videos at really opportune times, and then claim that the feed went out because CNN sabotaged the interview.

It's quite effective in demonstrating how stupid the anchors at cnn are, and what a subhuman piece of fecal matter hillary is.
goEMAW Karmic BBS Shepherd

Offline sonofdaxjones

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 53340
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #2086 on: August 12, 2016, 06:11:24 AM »
Multiple FBI field offices called for investigations of the Clinton Foundation but DOJ stopped.   States Chief of Staff possibly also on CF payroll at same time. 

Offline SkinnyBenny

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 16700
  • good time rock-n-roll plastic banana FM type
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #2087 on: August 12, 2016, 06:18:25 AM »
You guys are so butthurt that she's going to lazily rollerskate into the White House :cool:
« Last Edit: August 12, 2016, 07:38:03 AM by SkinnyBenny »
"walking around mhk and crying in the rain because of love lost is the absolute purest and best thing in the world.  i hope i fall in love during the next few weeks and get my heart broken and it starts raining just to experience it one last time."   --Dlew12

Offline sonofdaxjones

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 53340
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #2088 on: August 12, 2016, 07:48:55 AM »
SB we've already established that you love corruption, war, Islamic theocrats, and support the war on women world wide.  No need to keep chiming in because you're mad. 

Offline steve dave

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 85343
  • Romantic Fist Attachment
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #2089 on: August 12, 2016, 07:53:00 AM »
whoa, you love all that stuff SB?  :frown:

Offline sonofdaxjones

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 53340
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #2090 on: August 12, 2016, 08:08:01 AM »
whoa, you love all that stuff SB?  :frown:

:frown

#russianhackers

Online CNS

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 36687
  • I'm Athletes
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #2091 on: August 12, 2016, 08:36:15 AM »
Guys, it's totally ok to not want trump and to think that Hillary compromised our country's security and secrets and shouldn't have the oppy to put the country in further harms way by electing her president. 

It's not offering a solution, but recognizing two problems.

Offline Yard Dog

  • Baller on a Budget
  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 2468
  • I am DC Cat
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #2092 on: August 12, 2016, 09:03:19 AM »
Guys, it's totally ok to not want trump and to think that Hillary compromised our country's security and secrets and shouldn't have the oppy to put the country in further harms way by electing her president. 

It's not offering a solution, but recognizing two problems.

^This. Those who are defending Hillary as if she is a perfect little angel need to pull their heads out of the sand or their a**es.

Offline ChiComCat

  • Chawbacon
  • Contributor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 17593
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #2093 on: August 12, 2016, 09:05:33 AM »
Guys, it's totally ok to not want trump and to think that Hillary compromised our country's security and secrets and shouldn't have the oppy to put the country in further harms way by electing her president. 

It's not offering a solution, but recognizing two problems.

^This. Those who are defending Hillary as if she is a perfect little angel need to pull their heads out of the sand or their a**es.

I don't know of anyone who thinks Hillary is a perfect little angel

Offline star seed 7

  • hyperactive on the :lol:
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 64044
  • good dog
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #2094 on: August 12, 2016, 09:10:00 AM »
Oh come on "chicat", we both know you think Hillary is an innocent angel
Hyperbolic partisan duplicitous hypocrite

Offline sonofdaxjones

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 53340
    • View Profile
Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #2095 on: August 12, 2016, 09:14:37 AM »
A decade ago I rolled my eyes at the Clintons and had things stayed the same I'd vote for her, but not now.  It's diabolical to think the Clinton's managed to up their corruption and her love of war by a 1000 fold, but I'll be eff'd they didn't get it accomplished.

Online CNS

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 36687
  • I'm Athletes
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #2096 on: August 12, 2016, 09:15:38 AM »
I mean, Dax aside, I think most ppl view this as a lesser of two stupids rather than evils.  It's a crap position.

Sent from my SM-G900T using Tapatalk


Offline sonofdaxjones

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 53340
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #2097 on: August 12, 2016, 09:45:30 AM »
I'm not voting for either one and it's pure idiocy to think she's the lessor in terms of evil.   She's a horrible human being and the world is far worse off because she's a horrible human being.

Offline star seed 7

  • hyperactive on the :lol:
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 64044
  • good dog
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #2098 on: August 12, 2016, 09:46:43 AM »
Dax is very confident that trump alone can fix this mess of a country
Hyperbolic partisan duplicitous hypocrite

Offline sonofdaxjones

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 53340
    • View Profile
Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #2099 on: August 12, 2016, 10:12:07 AM »
I'm confident that Johnson would be a move in a positive direction.  Lib on the other hand will make and is a great Hilbot.

#hilbotsbooputin