Author Topic: Hillary LOL (f/k/a Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch f/k/a Hillary 2016?)  (Read 335280 times)

0 Members and 6 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline Cartierfor3

  • Fattyfest Champion
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 27092
  • I just want us all to be buds.
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #2050 on: August 10, 2016, 11:28:50 AM »
i'm just saying, most people I know in their 70s struggle to know what to order or work the remote

Offline mocat

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 39169
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #2051 on: August 10, 2016, 11:43:39 AM »
the 50's is the prime decade to be a president imo

Offline mocat

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 39169
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #2052 on: August 10, 2016, 11:48:12 AM »
I may change my answer; these are the last 4 presidents to enter office in their 40's:

Teddy 42
JFK 43
Clinton 46
Obama 47

 :surprised:

Offline catastrophe

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 15223
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #2053 on: August 10, 2016, 11:49:13 AM »
She wasn't indicted because they don't think they can make the charges stick.  People don't like fighting battles they don't think they can win.

She for sure had multiple emails that were top secret, or higher classified, on her private server.  She also signed a doc that governs the handling of such info that doesn't allow that. 

I mean, there doesn't seem to be grey area in that.

I think the bigger crime requires some kind of intent, which they cannot really prove. It is also a crime simply to have the emails like that, but from my understanding they don't consistently enforce that one against other people in similar circumstances so it would basically just be selective in this case.

Online CNS

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 36687
  • I'm Athletes
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #2054 on: August 10, 2016, 01:30:43 PM »
She wasn't indicted because they don't think they can make the charges stick.  People don't like fighting battles they don't think they can win.

She for sure had multiple emails that were top secret, or higher classified, on her private server.  She also signed a doc that governs the handling of such info that doesn't allow that. 

I mean, there doesn't seem to be grey area in that.

I think the bigger crime requires some kind of intent, which they cannot really prove. It is also a crime simply to have the emails like that, but from my understanding they don't consistently enforce that one against other people in similar circumstances so it would basically just be selective in this case.

The everybody is doing it defense.  Taking it old school. 

If that is the case, even more reason to charge.  That crap needs to stop and someone that doesn't recognize that doesn't need the ability to expose us further as president.

Online wetwillie

  • goEMAW Poster of the WEEK
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 30432
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #2055 on: August 10, 2016, 01:33:28 PM »
I think if The FBI director was sure he could nail her on it he would.  Most accounts I've read about him suggest he is someone interested in seeing justice served even if it's unpopular.
When the bullets are flying, that's when I'm at my best

Online CNS

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 36687
  • I'm Athletes
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #2056 on: August 10, 2016, 01:34:24 PM »
I think if The FBI director was sure he could nail her on it he would.  Most accounts I've read about him suggest he is someone interested in seeing justice served even if it's unpopular.

What about his Bill Clinton friend boss?

Online wetwillie

  • goEMAW Poster of the WEEK
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 30432
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #2057 on: August 10, 2016, 01:38:15 PM »
You could be right, I've talked to a buddy who is a US attorney and he said it just wasn't a winnable case.
When the bullets are flying, that's when I'm at my best

Offline Yard Dog

  • Baller on a Budget
  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 2468
  • I am DC Cat
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #2058 on: August 10, 2016, 01:46:21 PM »
Was chatting with a friend of mine who has been on Tim Kaine's staff for several years now.

1) The friend is pretty pumped because he loves the show Veep.

2) Said that Tim only agreed to be VP if Hillary acknowledged that keeping any of Obama's people around or bringing back any of Bill's would look bad. Therefore encouraging her to take on some of his people.

3) If Tim's current staff don't want to work in the white house, Tim has promised to find them a nice cushy landing spot somewhere else in the government.

Offline renocat

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 5971
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #2059 on: August 10, 2016, 02:00:09 PM »
Assange of Wikileaks said a DNC staffer hack them.  He was murdered recently.  Bill, the Godfarter?

Offline sonofdaxjones

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 53340
    • View Profile
Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #2060 on: August 10, 2016, 02:14:20 PM »
FBI blocked twice from investigating Clinton Foundation by DOJ. 

The fear of death was palpable.

#curses #russianhackers
« Last Edit: August 10, 2016, 02:19:20 PM by sonofdaxjones »

Offline catastrophe

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 15223
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #2061 on: August 10, 2016, 02:32:14 PM »

The everybody is doing it defense.  Taking it old school. 

If that is the case, even more reason to charge.  That crap needs to stop and someone that doesn't recognize that doesn't need the ability to expose us further as president.

I tend to agree, but it creates a lot of problems if you can show a criminal statute is being selectively enforced. I also doubt the penalty for the weaker offense was substantial enough to derail Hilldawg's presidential campaign (not sure though).

It was going to be a political decision no matter what. In my opinion the FBI dude did as good as he could by publicly chastising Hilldawg but not doing enough to wind up at the bottom of a lake somewhere without any teeth or fingerprints.

Offline sonofdaxjones

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 53340
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #2062 on: August 10, 2016, 07:28:32 PM »


Tapatalk, man

Offline gatoveintisiete

  • Racist Piece of Shit
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 4036
  • Cold Ass Honkey
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #2063 on: August 10, 2016, 08:20:37 PM »
Reprehensible  :frown:
it’s not like I’m tired of WINNING, but dude, let me catch my breath.

Offline Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!)

  • Racist Piece of Shit
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 18431
  • Kiss my ass and suck my dick
    • View Profile
    • I am the one and only Sugar Dick
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #2064 on: August 10, 2016, 09:31:40 PM »
Warning: may contain soviet counterintelligence
goEMAW Karmic BBS Shepherd

Offline sonofdaxjones

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 53340
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #2065 on: August 11, 2016, 06:23:36 AM »
But ya see, she's a big advocate for women ya know. 

#soviethackers!


Offline Yard Dog

  • Baller on a Budget
  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 2468
  • I am DC Cat
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #2066 on: August 11, 2016, 12:17:05 PM »
But guys, if you don't vote for this despicable human being the Republicans will put a bunch of Scalias on the Supreme Court. 

Offline SdK

  • Libertine
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 20951
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #2067 on: August 11, 2016, 12:27:52 PM »
Assange says murdered dnc dude leaked the emails not the Russians  :horrorsurprise:

Just the DNC protecting Hillary. House of Cards is reality TV.


Yes it is. Did anyone ever thing otherwise?

Offline Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!)

  • Racist Piece of Shit
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 18431
  • Kiss my ass and suck my dick
    • View Profile
    • I am the one and only Sugar Dick
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #2068 on: August 11, 2016, 01:20:49 PM »
But guys, if you don't vote for this despicable human being the Republicans will put a bunch of Scalias on the Supreme Court.

Would take.
goEMAW Karmic BBS Shepherd

Online john "teach me how to" dougie

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 7639
  • 1cat
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #2069 on: August 11, 2016, 01:56:58 PM »
Assange says murdered dnc dude leaked the emails not the Russians  :horrorsurprise:

Just the DNC protecting Hillary. House of Cards is reality TV.


Yes it is. Did anyone ever thing otherwise?

Well, most liberals think the government is a benevolent god.

Offline SdK

  • Libertine
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 20951
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #2070 on: August 11, 2016, 02:07:31 PM »
Assange says murdered dnc dude leaked the emails not the Russians  :horrorsurprise:

Just the DNC protecting Hillary. House of Cards is reality TV.


Yes it is. Did anyone ever thing otherwise?

Well, most liberals think the government is a benevolent god.
My uncle said when asked Bill said the show was 99% accurate. No clue if that was said or not.

I've long assumed most of the stuff in the show is true for most politicians. The killing or having people killed reserved for the politicians with long tenures and high ranking positions.

Offline steve dave

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 85343
  • Romantic Fist Attachment
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #2071 on: August 11, 2016, 02:20:01 PM »
alright! conspiracy theories!

Online john "teach me how to" dougie

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 7639
  • 1cat
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #2072 on: August 11, 2016, 03:40:28 PM »
media  :curse:


Offline SkinnyBenny

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 16700
  • good time rock-n-roll plastic banana FM type
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #2073 on: August 11, 2016, 04:02:31 PM »
media  :curse:



:lol: Man, this is a really low-rent video and a pretty transparent piece of crap. Nice chipmunk voices?
"walking around mhk and crying in the rain because of love lost is the absolute purest and best thing in the world.  i hope i fall in love during the next few weeks and get my heart broken and it starts raining just to experience it one last time."   --Dlew12

Offline chuckjames

  • Combo-Fan
  • **
  • Posts: 858
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #2074 on: August 11, 2016, 04:17:09 PM »
I see the pit has been taken over by a lot /r/TheDonald subscribers.