Author Topic: Hillary LOL (f/k/a Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch f/k/a Hillary 2016?)  (Read 335264 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!)

  • Racist Piece of Shit
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 18431
  • Kiss my ass and suck my dick
    • View Profile
    • I am the one and only Sugar Dick
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #1675 on: July 05, 2016, 11:11:38 AM »
The timing of that meeting with the AG followed so closely by this report is a really bad look for the Clintons and the B.O. admin. It is likely to fuel more populist outrage.
goEMAW Karmic BBS Shepherd

Offline john "teach me how to" dougie

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 7638
  • 1cat
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #1676 on: July 05, 2016, 12:51:47 PM »

Offline OK_Cat

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 16212
  • Hey
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #1677 on: July 05, 2016, 12:55:13 PM »
fill me in   :ohno:

http://goEMAW.com/forum/index.php?topic=36074.msg1582133#msg1582133

oh, that's a relief. I thought it was going to be something unforgivably racist or something.

also there are not really any socks on here. a couple with a few posts but nothing with any regularity.

POST THE EMAILS, STEVEDAVE!

Offline renocat

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 5971
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #1678 on: July 05, 2016, 05:15:39 PM »
I am sitting on the toilet purging myself for a colonoscopy, a fitting tribute to Blackhole Hilliary.

Offline bucket

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 9558
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #1679 on: July 05, 2016, 05:41:56 PM »
I would want Trump to beat her if we wouldn't have to have Donald Trump as president after that happened. Still, election night just might be great enough for it to be worth it.

Offline chum1

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 21917
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #1680 on: July 05, 2016, 06:06:55 PM »
Well, this is complete bullshit. What's our next angle to bring her down?

Offline renocat

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 5971
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #1681 on: July 05, 2016, 06:16:14 PM »
Well, this is complete bullshit. What's our next angle to bring her down?
She is guilty of perjury before Congress.  The maximum penalty is 5 years in jail.

Offline SkinnyBenny

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 16700
  • good time rock-n-roll plastic banana FM type
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #1682 on: July 05, 2016, 06:30:47 PM »
I am so thrilled about this FBI recommendo today. The butthurt on here and the internet in general is just off the charts. Teflon Hill.
"walking around mhk and crying in the rain because of love lost is the absolute purest and best thing in the world.  i hope i fall in love during the next few weeks and get my heart broken and it starts raining just to experience it one last time."   --Dlew12

Online star seed 7

  • hyperactive on the :lol:
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 64044
  • good dog
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #1683 on: July 05, 2016, 06:49:29 PM »
Well, this is complete bullshit. What's our next angle to bring her down?

Lol
Hyperbolic partisan duplicitous hypocrite

Offline sonofdaxjones

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 53340
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #1684 on: July 06, 2016, 06:21:54 AM »
So sad that Benny loves corrupt Neo-Cons, apparently he wants to see more Americans and Muslims killed in what will be yet another cycle of perpetual war if Hillary is elected. 

Sad

Offline sonofdaxjones

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 53340
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #1685 on: July 06, 2016, 06:40:58 AM »
What a scene:  Hillary up on stage in her Mao cut pink pantsuit, Obama stammering and stumbling trying to spit something out remotely coherent  and all the Hilbots in the audience.   

Just looking forward to her next visit to an all black church.

Offline SkinnyBenny

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 16700
  • good time rock-n-roll plastic banana FM type
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #1686 on: July 06, 2016, 12:10:02 PM »
You are super weird, fyi
"walking around mhk and crying in the rain because of love lost is the absolute purest and best thing in the world.  i hope i fall in love during the next few weeks and get my heart broken and it starts raining just to experience it one last time."   --Dlew12

Offline Brock Landers

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 7082
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #1687 on: July 06, 2016, 12:13:03 PM »
He paints a vivid picture tho.

Offline sonofdaxjones

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 53340
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #1688 on: July 06, 2016, 12:34:35 PM »
I guess you love Trump so much you missed Hil and the pres's NC appearance.   

Offline catastrophe

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 15223
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #1689 on: July 06, 2016, 12:43:40 PM »
The funny thing about the non-recommendation to indict is that Hillary really can't flout it. You can't just say "not indicted, eff yea!" when so much else of what the FBI said was pretty critical of her judgment.

Offline SkinnyBenny

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 16700
  • good time rock-n-roll plastic banana FM type
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #1690 on: July 06, 2016, 12:59:58 PM »
The funny thing about the non-recommendation to indict is that Hillary really can't flout it. You can't just say "not indicted, eff yea!" when so much else of what the FBI said was pretty critical of her judgment.

Yeah, the whole thing was pretty lol
"walking around mhk and crying in the rain because of love lost is the absolute purest and best thing in the world.  i hope i fall in love during the next few weeks and get my heart broken and it starts raining just to experience it one last time."   --Dlew12

Online CNS

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 36686
  • I'm Athletes
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #1691 on: July 06, 2016, 01:04:49 PM »
I don't get it.  They said there were several issues that were confidential, top secret, etc and deemed so at the time of her sending it, and known to her at the time of sending it.  They noted negligence even.  How does she not get charged?  A guy on 98.1, this morning, even noted that there are two statutes dealing with this, one requiring intent and one that specifically doesnt.  WTF? 

I mean, this has to be about not pulling on the thread that could lead to indicting a whole handful of past dumbasses like Colin Powell, etc, who have already said they used a private server, right?

Sent from my SM-G900T using Tapatalk


Online Rage Against the McKee

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 37111
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #1692 on: July 06, 2016, 01:10:33 PM »
I'm reading that the FBI might still remove Hillary's security clearance.

Online CNS

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 36686
  • I'm Athletes
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #1693 on: July 06, 2016, 01:11:11 PM »
That's stupid at this point.

Sent from my SM-G900T using Tapatalk


Online Rage Against the McKee

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 37111
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #1694 on: July 06, 2016, 01:15:40 PM »
That's stupid at this point.

Sent from my SM-G900T using Tapatalk

Yeah, it's mostly tinfoil-hat types suggesting it. Presidential nominees get security briefings even if they don't have a clearance.

Offline renocat

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 5971
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #1695 on: July 06, 2016, 01:32:02 PM »
Olawbender said yesterday MG is ready and capable to prez -- if she can't follow laws as the SOS what horrors will she.unleash and how messed up will government be.  Mr. Lightshiningfrombutt said he will hand her the baton  -  She is a good liar, cheat, law ignorer like Big Chief OScrewem.  How can anybody believe any campaign promise she makes.

Offline bubbles4ksu

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 5488
  • Son of Pete
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #1696 on: July 06, 2016, 09:38:35 PM »
I'm reading that the FBI might still remove Hillary's security clearance.

that's up to the office of personnel management, not the fbi.

Offline bubbles4ksu

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 5488
  • Son of Pete
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #1697 on: July 06, 2016, 09:45:25 PM »
here's something i didn't understand about the fbi until recently: it's workforce is roughly 100% ex-badasses from the armed forces. this makes total sense when you think about who is selected for the job, but i don't think a lot of people consider it. federal law enforcement is done by former special operations bros/bras and it's that way from the people breaking down doors all the way to the judges.

Offline SkinnyBenny

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 16700
  • good time rock-n-roll plastic banana FM type
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #1698 on: July 06, 2016, 11:29:33 PM »
This is hilarious. It's like if Alabama got super busted for cheating and the NCAA was just like "yeah you guys are super duper guilty and this is a public rebuke. You were totally reckless and egregious in your flaunting of the rules. Not gonna do anything about it though, even though we've come down hard on other teams for basically the same thing and we even gave SMU the death penalty for it once upon a time." And Saban's like "kewl thx" and just moonwalks into another natty while dax and FSD and K-S-U sit stewing in their living rooms in Opelika.
« Last Edit: July 06, 2016, 11:33:59 PM by SkinnyBenny »
"walking around mhk and crying in the rain because of love lost is the absolute purest and best thing in the world.  i hope i fall in love during the next few weeks and get my heart broken and it starts raining just to experience it one last time."   --Dlew12

Offline mocat

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 39169
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #1699 on: July 07, 2016, 06:40:19 AM »
In my mind's eye i can envision the LSUfreek gif of that