Author Topic: Hillary LOL (f/k/a Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch f/k/a Hillary 2016?)  (Read 335131 times)

0 Members and 5 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline sonofdaxjones

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 53336
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #1650 on: July 01, 2016, 12:28:33 PM »
Don't worry Reno, the most corrupt political couple in national political history are going to skate again, and the huge Lib partisans in residence are going to rejoice.   Even the Washington Post is throwing the bullshit card at the Clintons on this issue, but she'll skate.   

LOL though at the "purely social" explanation from Lynch, oh my goodness. 

Offline SkinnyBenny

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 16700
  • good time rock-n-roll plastic banana FM type
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #1651 on: July 01, 2016, 01:32:09 PM »
Way too many missed period opportunities

Reno started posting with better conventions and grammar when SB started posting with more reno-isms :lol:
"walking around mhk and crying in the rain because of love lost is the absolute purest and best thing in the world.  i hope i fall in love during the next few weeks and get my heart broken and it starts raining just to experience it one last time."   --Dlew12

Offline renocat

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 5971
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #1652 on: July 04, 2016, 03:24:56 PM »
The New York Post is reporting that Huma Abedin admitted Hillary Clinton as Secretary of State had her daily schedule burned. This schedule was State Department property and should have been filed for public records. Hillary was destroyed public records. Why I wonder?

Offline steve dave

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 85343
  • Romantic Fist Attachment
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #1653 on: July 05, 2016, 10:24:31 AM »
no charges, sorry ksu-dub  :frown:

Offline K-S-U-Wildcats!

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 10040
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #1654 on: July 05, 2016, 10:25:27 AM »
No charges. Was "extremely careless" but evidently setting up a private server to circumvent FOIA requests and likely exposing 1000s of classified and top secret emails on that server to foreign agents is not a crime. That's good to know going forward. I assume the FBI would apply this same level of deference to any American.

Liberals - pleas ensue celebration of yet another ass wipe with the rule of law. All in the name of politics.
I've said it before and I'll say it again, K-State fans could have beheaded the entire KU team at midcourt, and K-State fans would be celebrating it this morning.  They are the ISIS of Big 12 fanbases.

Offline K-S-U-Wildcats!

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 10040
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #1655 on: July 05, 2016, 10:30:03 AM »
Quote
“Although there is evidence of potential violations of the statutes regarding the handling of classified information, our judgment is that no reasonable prosecutor would bring such a case. Prosecutors necessarily weigh a number of factors before deciding whether to bring charges,” Comey said.

Well that's convincing. Yup - no corruption here. Prosecutors are known for deference to criminals after all.
I've said it before and I'll say it again, K-State fans could have beheaded the entire KU team at midcourt, and K-State fans would be celebrating it this morning.  They are the ISIS of Big 12 fanbases.

Offline renocat

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 5971
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #1656 on: July 05, 2016, 10:34:14 AM »
no charges, sorry ksu-dub  :frown:
This is like someone in hell telling it okay to smoke a.gas soaked cigar.  Comey said she violated the law in handling classified information and blatantly tried.to hide public information from the public who was her boss and.had the right to.  This graying of black and white lines about obeying the laws of the land piiiiiiiisses me off.   America will go dumbass and elect her.  We need gorilla killer and leader Trump for prez.

Offline steve dave

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 85343
  • Romantic Fist Attachment
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #1657 on: July 05, 2016, 10:35:51 AM »
reno says what we all think

Online Tobias

  • Fattyfest Champion
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 29146
  • hypoclique lieutenant
    • View Profile
Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #1658 on: July 05, 2016, 10:36:56 AM »
does steve dave even know? :frown:

Offline CNS

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 36685
  • I'm Athletes
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #1659 on: July 05, 2016, 10:37:08 AM »
Welp.  President Clinton just won.

Offline steve dave

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 85343
  • Romantic Fist Attachment
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #1660 on: July 05, 2016, 10:39:57 AM »
does steve dave even know? :frown:

fill me in   :ohno:

Offline Rage Against the McKee

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 37111
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #1661 on: July 05, 2016, 10:41:01 AM »
The FBI is still investigating the Clinton Foundation or corruption, guys. There is still hope. Don't let the dream die just yet.

Offline 420seriouscat69

  • Don't get zapped! #zap
  • Wackycat
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 63922
  • #1 rated - gE NFL Scout
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #1662 on: July 05, 2016, 10:41:17 AM »
If anyone else was running against her, she would have been guilty.

Online Tobias

  • Fattyfest Champion
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 29146
  • hypoclique lieutenant
    • View Profile

Offline steve dave

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 85343
  • Romantic Fist Attachment
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #1664 on: July 05, 2016, 10:46:18 AM »

Offline 420seriouscat69

  • Don't get zapped! #zap
  • Wackycat
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 63922
  • #1 rated - gE NFL Scout
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #1665 on: July 05, 2016, 10:49:03 AM »
Kinda sad tho.

Offline sonofdaxjones

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 53336
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #1666 on: July 05, 2016, 10:49:27 AM »
The truly sad part is that there's so many brain washed Libs who believe that at her (their, as in Hil and Bill) core she's an honest person.    Nothing could be further from the truth. 

But, no one should be surprised by this, when Bill is having secret meetings with the AG, you know the fix is in.  Just wonder how many more political favors she had to give away to save her ass. 

Offline Rage Against the McKee

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 37111
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #1667 on: July 05, 2016, 10:52:01 AM »
I would want Trump to beat her if we wouldn't have to have Donald Trump as president after that happened. Still, election night just might be great enough for it to be worth it.

Offline john "teach me how to" dougie

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 7637
  • 1cat
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #1668 on: July 05, 2016, 10:54:57 AM »
does steve dave even know? :frown:

He's always known.

Offline wetwillie

  • goEMAW Poster of the WEEK
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 30431
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #1669 on: July 05, 2016, 10:55:38 AM »
Remember when IPA4ME said it was a forgone conclusion the FBI would recommend an indictment and when the justice department failed to act on it there would be mass resignations? :lol:
When the bullets are flying, that's when I'm at my best

Offline john "teach me how to" dougie

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 7637
  • 1cat
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #1670 on: July 05, 2016, 10:57:15 AM »
The truly sad part is that there's so many brain washed Libs who believe that at her (their, as in Hil and Bill) core she's an honest person.    Nothing could be further from the truth. 

But, no one should be surprised by this, when Bill is having secret meetings with the AG, you know the fix is in.  Just wonder how many more political favors she had to give away to save her ass.

Supreme court nominee Loretta Lynch, or maybe an ambassadorship to some exotic locale for an 8 year vacation?

Offline wetwillie

  • goEMAW Poster of the WEEK
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 30431
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #1671 on: July 05, 2016, 11:00:01 AM »
The truly sad part is that there's so many brain washed Libs who believe that at her (their, as in Hil and Bill) core she's an honest person.    Nothing could be further from the truth. 

But, no one should be surprised by this, when Bill is having secret meetings with the AG, you know the fix is in.  Just wonder how many more political favors she had to give away to save her ass.

Supreme court nominee Loretta Lynch, or maybe an ambassadorship to some exotic locale for an 8 year vacation?

Last time I checked Loretta Lynch doesn't work for the FBI
When the bullets are flying, that's when I'm at my best

Offline steve dave

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 85343
  • Romantic Fist Attachment
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #1672 on: July 05, 2016, 11:00:36 AM »
fill me in   :ohno:

http://goEMAW.com/forum/index.php?topic=36074.msg1582133#msg1582133

oh, that's a relief. I thought it was going to be something unforgivably racist or something.

also there are not really any socks on here. a couple with a few posts but nothing with any regularity.

Offline sonofdaxjones

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 53336
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #1673 on: July 05, 2016, 11:01:26 AM »
Wetwillie:  Simpleton

Offline john "teach me how to" dougie

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 7637
  • 1cat
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #1674 on: July 05, 2016, 11:01:59 AM »
The truly sad part is that there's so many brain washed Libs who believe that at her (their, as in Hil and Bill) core she's an honest person.    Nothing could be further from the truth. 

But, no one should be surprised by this, when Bill is having secret meetings with the AG, you know the fix is in.  Just wonder how many more political favors she had to give away to save her ass.

Supreme court nominee Loretta Lynch, or maybe an ambassadorship to some exotic locale for an 8 year vacation?

Last time I checked Loretta Lynch doesn't work for the FBI

But the entire FBI works for the Justice Dept.