Author Topic: Hillary LOL (f/k/a Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch f/k/a Hillary 2016?)  (Read 335136 times)

0 Members and 6 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline ednksu

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 9862
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #1125 on: February 01, 2016, 01:06:50 PM »
every politician in the history of the world has an email they use to avoid FOI

Non issue
Not an issue for Reno or KSUW when Brownback does it though....
Quote from: OregonHawk
KU is right on par with Notre Dame ... when it comes to adding additional conference revenue

Quote from: Kim Carnes
Beer pro tip: never drink anything other than BL, coors, pbr, maybe a few others that I'm forgetting

Offline ednksu

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 9862
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #1126 on: February 01, 2016, 01:08:08 PM »
Thank you for clarifying but wasn't a large portion of the Benghazi investigation related to e-mails? Are they not one and the same?

Oh I see what you're saying. Yeah, it was discovered that Hillary exclusively used a private server as a result of doc requests during the Benghazi investigation. But no, I wouldn't say they're one and the same.

Can you point to an email that specifically states "hey guies, hit my gmail to male genitals block dem FOIA hits because Benghazi" or something like that.

This stuff is gold! :lol: To Edna, there's no proof Clinton set up a private server to evade FOIA requests unless she expressly admitted it. :lol:

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2016/01/07/clintons-private-email-account-exploits-foia-loophole-report-says.html

Quote
EXCLUSIVE: Hillary Clinton’s unorthodox use of a private email account and personal server for government business exploited a loophole in the State Department's FOIA, or Freedom of Information Act, process, according to the findings of the first Inspector General report to stem from her email scandal.

Congress asked the Office of Inspector General, the State Department's independent watchdog, to investigate the issue following the revelation that Mrs. Clinton did not use a government email account while secretary of state.

Fox News reviewed the 25-page report and its findings before they were made publicly available.

The report reads in part:

"FOIA neither authorizes nor requires agencies to search for Federal records in personal email accounts maintained on private servers or through commercial providers (for example Gmail, Yahoo, and Hotmail.)  Furthermore, the FOIA Analyst has no way to independently locate Federal records from such accounts unless employees take steps to preserve official emails in Department record keeping systems.”

The report strongly suggests that it relies on employees at all levels to follow the regulations, and when personal email is used, to forward copies to a State Department account so that it can be captured.

"Under current law and Department policy, employees who use personal email to conduct official business are required to forward or copy email from a personal account to their respective Department accounts within 20 Days.” 

Clinton did not have a State Department email address to which she could forward message traffic from her personal account, and it remains unclear whether she provided all her State Department business emails to the State Department or federal courts, where FOIA lawsuits have been filed.

So you're saying you made up the part where she specifically used a private email server to get around Benghazi hearings.  Good to know facts and truth are relative. 

I'll await your next purely dogmaticly drive "truth" or "fact" based entirely in your reality.
Quote from: OregonHawk
KU is right on par with Notre Dame ... when it comes to adding additional conference revenue

Quote from: Kim Carnes
Beer pro tip: never drink anything other than BL, coors, pbr, maybe a few others that I'm forgetting

Offline K-S-U-Wildcats!

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 10040
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #1127 on: February 01, 2016, 01:12:09 PM »
every politician in the history of the world has an email they use to avoid FOI

Non issue
Not an issue for Reno or KSUW when Brownback does it though....

Oh did Brownback have access to classified info?
I've said it before and I'll say it again, K-State fans could have beheaded the entire KU team at midcourt, and K-State fans would be celebrating it this morning.  They are the ISIS of Big 12 fanbases.

Offline K-S-U-Wildcats!

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 10040
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #1128 on: February 01, 2016, 01:17:31 PM »
So you're saying you made up the part where she specifically used a private email server to get around Benghazi hearings.  Good to know facts and truth are relative. 

I'll await your next purely dogmaticly drive "truth" or "fact" based entirely in your reality.

Edna, you're crazy is showing. Zip it up. I never said "she specifically used a private email server to get around Benghazi hearings." Her use of the private server well predates Benghazi.
I've said it before and I'll say it again, K-State fans could have beheaded the entire KU team at midcourt, and K-State fans would be celebrating it this morning.  They are the ISIS of Big 12 fanbases.

Offline Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!)

  • Racist Piece of Shit
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 18431
  • Kiss my ass and suck my dick
    • View Profile
    • I am the one and only Sugar Dick
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #1129 on: February 01, 2016, 01:18:01 PM »
I'd like to point out the "all politicians do this to evade the foia" is at best unsubstantiated, and really false juxtaposition from the usual libtard apologists.

We're talking about highly classified military information, not some account Jeb (not subject to foia) used to receive porn and manage his fantasy golf team.
goEMAW Karmic BBS Shepherd

Offline ednksu

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 9862
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #1130 on: February 01, 2016, 01:21:07 PM »
So you're saying you made up the part where she specifically used a private email server to get around Benghazi hearings.  Good to know facts and truth are relative. 

I'll await your next purely dogmaticly drive "truth" or "fact" based entirely in your reality.

Edna, you're crazy is showing. Zip it up. I never said "she specifically used a private email server to get around Benghazi hearings." Her use of the private server well predates Benghazi.

Quote from: KSUW
Yeah, it was discovered that Hillary exclusively used a private server as a result of doc requests during the Benghazi investigation.
You can't even keep the facts straight in your posts.
Quote from: OregonHawk
KU is right on par with Notre Dame ... when it comes to adding additional conference revenue

Quote from: Kim Carnes
Beer pro tip: never drink anything other than BL, coors, pbr, maybe a few others that I'm forgetting

Offline ednksu

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 9862
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #1131 on: February 01, 2016, 01:22:07 PM »
I'd like to point out the "all politicians do this to evade the foia" is at best unsubstantiated, and really false juxtaposition from the usual libtard apologists.

We're talking about highly classified military information, not some account Jeb (not subject to foia) used to receive porn and manage his fantasy golf team.

The fact that you guys can't even keep an internal narrative is funny.  Also great that you don't understand questioning your narratives isn't an endorsement of another position.
Quote from: OregonHawk
KU is right on par with Notre Dame ... when it comes to adding additional conference revenue

Quote from: Kim Carnes
Beer pro tip: never drink anything other than BL, coors, pbr, maybe a few others that I'm forgetting

Offline K-S-U-Wildcats!

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 10040
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #1132 on: February 01, 2016, 01:25:22 PM »
So you're saying you made up the part where she specifically used a private email server to get around Benghazi hearings.  Good to know facts and truth are relative. 

I'll await your next purely dogmaticly drive "truth" or "fact" based entirely in your reality.

Edna, you're crazy is showing. Zip it up. I never said "she specifically used a private email server to get around Benghazi hearings." Her use of the private server well predates Benghazi.

Quote from: KSUW
Yeah, it was discovered that Hillary exclusively used a private server as a result of doc requests during the Benghazi investigation.
You can't even keep the facts straight in your posts.

Edna, yu don't read gud. "It was discovered that Hillary exclusively used a private server as a result of doc requests during the Benghazi investigation." The Benghazi hearings led to the discovery. You can't really be this stupid, can you? The facts are that Hillary used a private server from the very start. That's not in dispute.
I've said it before and I'll say it again, K-State fans could have beheaded the entire KU team at midcourt, and K-State fans would be celebrating it this morning.  They are the ISIS of Big 12 fanbases.

Offline CNS

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 36685
  • I'm Athletes
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #1133 on: February 01, 2016, 01:26:49 PM »
There is def several concerns:

1. the FOIA issue.  Those aren't her emails, they are our emails.  The lack of access to her work product as a Sec of State is unacceptable
2. the security classification and national security issue.  eff her for putting us one hack away from others having classified info


#2 is def the worst of the two, but #1 needs to be addressed badly as well.  I don't give a crap about an official's access to classified info.  Any and all public office work needs to be on a public office provided email acct and server. 

Porn and golf teams to be managed off of private accts where no public biz is handled. 

Both are serious issues.

Offline ednksu

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 9862
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #1134 on: February 01, 2016, 01:28:53 PM »
There is def several concerns:

1. the FOIA issue.  Those aren't her emails, they are our emails.  The lack of access to her work product as a Sec of State is unacceptable
2. the security classification and national security issue.  eff her for putting us one hack away from others having classified info


#2 is def the worst of the two, but #1 needs to be addressed badly as well.  I don't give a crap about an official's access to classified info.  Any and all public office work needs to be on a public office provided email acct and server. 

Porn and golf teams to be managed off of private accts where no public biz is handled. 

Both are serious issues.
Great post, and what 99% of us believe. 
Quote from: OregonHawk
KU is right on par with Notre Dame ... when it comes to adding additional conference revenue

Quote from: Kim Carnes
Beer pro tip: never drink anything other than BL, coors, pbr, maybe a few others that I'm forgetting

Offline Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!)

  • Racist Piece of Shit
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 18431
  • Kiss my ass and suck my dick
    • View Profile
    • I am the one and only Sugar Dick
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #1135 on: February 01, 2016, 01:29:45 PM »
I'd like to point out the "all politicians do this to evade the foia" is at best unsubstantiated, and really false juxtaposition from the usual libtard apologists.

We're talking about highly classified military information, not some account Jeb (not subject to foia) used to receive porn and manage his fantasy golf team.

The fact that you guys can't even keep an internal narrative is funny.  Also great that you don't understand questioning your narratives isn't an endorsement of another position.

Do you think we have otr pit meeting, whack-a-doodle?
goEMAW Karmic BBS Shepherd

Offline Rage Against the McKee

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 37111
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #1136 on: February 01, 2016, 01:33:02 PM »
every politician in the history of the world has an email they use to avoid FOI

Non issue

It really is an issue, and it would be great if there were a high profile case to put a stop to that practice.

Offline ednksu

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 9862
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #1137 on: February 01, 2016, 01:35:28 PM »
I'd like to point out the "all politicians do this to evade the foia" is at best unsubstantiated, and really false juxtaposition from the usual libtard apologists.

We're talking about highly classified military information, not some account Jeb (not subject to foia) used to receive porn and manage his fantasy golf team.

The fact that you guys can't even keep an internal narrative is funny.  Also great that you don't understand questioning your narratives isn't an endorsement of another position.

Do you think we have otr pit meeting, whack-a-doodle?

Yes, probably listen to neo-con radio waiting for your next commands while hold up in your Obamaproof bunkers.
Quote from: OregonHawk
KU is right on par with Notre Dame ... when it comes to adding additional conference revenue

Quote from: Kim Carnes
Beer pro tip: never drink anything other than BL, coors, pbr, maybe a few others that I'm forgetting

Offline michigancat

  • Contributor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 53786
  • change your stupid avatar.
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #1138 on: February 01, 2016, 01:36:10 PM »
There is def several concerns:

1. the FOIA issue.  Those aren't her emails, they are our emails.  The lack of access to her work product as a Sec of State is unacceptable
2. the security classification and national security issue.  eff her for putting us one hack away from others having classified info


#2 is def the worst of the two, but #1 needs to be addressed badly as well.  I don't give a crap about an official's access to classified info.  Any and all public office work needs to be on a public office provided email acct and server. 

Porn and golf teams to be managed off of private accts where no public biz is handled. 

Both are serious issues.

#1 is far worse

Offline K-S-U-Wildcats!

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 10040
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #1139 on: February 01, 2016, 02:17:29 PM »
Both are bad, but I'd say that Number 2 is much more damaging in the short run.
I've said it before and I'll say it again, K-State fans could have beheaded the entire KU team at midcourt, and K-State fans would be celebrating it this morning.  They are the ISIS of Big 12 fanbases.

Offline 8manpick

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 19132
  • A top quartile binger, poster, and friend
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #1140 on: February 01, 2016, 02:23:04 PM »
If you think #2 is worse than #1, you have far more belief in the effectiveness of the security systems used by the government email servers than I have.
:adios:

Offline K-S-U-Wildcats!

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 10040
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #1141 on: February 01, 2016, 02:28:52 PM »
If you think #2 is worse than #1, you have far more belief in the effectiveness of the security systems used by the government email servers than I have.

Fair enough. I guess I do have a little faith in the government's ability to encrypt high level classified communications as opposed to running a server in a bathroom closet of a private IT firm. And I could very well be wrong. But many experts believe it is "a certainty" that Hillary's server was hacked. See, for example:

Quote
Former intelligence officials say it's a certainty that her server was compromised by foreign intelligence services.

Unless they were encrypted to U.S. government standards, "In my opinion there is a 100% chance that all emails sent and received by her, including all the electronic correspondence stored on her server in her Chappaqua residence, were targeted and collected by the Russian equivalent of NSA," said former CIA case officer Jason Matthews, an expert in Russian intelligence.

Then again, Clinton defenders point out, the State Department's unclassified email system also has been penetrated by Russian hackers, so it's unclear her use of home server made a difference.

http://bigstory.ap.org/urn:publicid:ap.org:b54a250a40e9410baaaca5f9fb58ea94
I've said it before and I'll say it again, K-State fans could have beheaded the entire KU team at midcourt, and K-State fans would be celebrating it this morning.  They are the ISIS of Big 12 fanbases.

Offline Emo EMAW

  • PCKK7DC Survivor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *******
  • Posts: 17891
  • Unrepentant traditional emobro
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #1142 on: February 01, 2016, 02:31:28 PM »
As long as no more than 3% of Hillary's emails were classified we shouldn't really care.

Offline michigancat

  • Contributor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 53786
  • change your stupid avatar.
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #1143 on: February 01, 2016, 02:45:41 PM »
I have little confidence in our government with handling secrets, period. Secrets are bad.

Offline CNS

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 36685
  • I'm Athletes
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #1144 on: February 01, 2016, 03:13:34 PM »
I have little confidence in our govt to do anything in anyone's best interest other than their own personal interest.

Offline ednksu

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 9862
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #1145 on: February 01, 2016, 03:17:36 PM »
Quote from: OregonHawk
KU is right on par with Notre Dame ... when it comes to adding additional conference revenue

Quote from: Kim Carnes
Beer pro tip: never drink anything other than BL, coors, pbr, maybe a few others that I'm forgetting

Offline renocat

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 5971
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #1146 on: February 01, 2016, 03:48:33 PM »
Hillary, Hillary, Hillary.  Fox news is reporting the information in the 22 emails that the State Department will not release contains actionable information about human espionage pactices that puts people at jeopardy, and whether marked or not any one with security clearance should have known the sensitive nature of them.  The disclosure statement MG signed says whether marked or not a person with security clearance is obligated to protect this information.  Also apparently Sidney Blumenthal had access to secret information and was sending emails on the unsecured server to MG all of the time.  HE DID NOT HAVE SECURITY CLEARANCE.   What a ripper.

Offline ednksu

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 9862
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #1147 on: February 01, 2016, 03:58:42 PM »
Well it's TS for a reason...

But I think this is where the rubber has to hit to road.  Unfortunately the policy and the actual info at risk are reaching critical mass.  Before I was fine with Hilrod manipulating things on a policy violation level.  On a meta level it's totally mumped that FOIA, one of the great tools of transparency, was so easily circumvented.   But now that we know, for sure, classified info was "at risk" we've reach another level.  It's one thing to farm your bullshit out on your server, but classified, especially TS level material being at risk is just so rough ridin' stupid on her part.  Really shows she gives no fucks about the system. 
Quote from: OregonHawk
KU is right on par with Notre Dame ... when it comes to adding additional conference revenue

Quote from: Kim Carnes
Beer pro tip: never drink anything other than BL, coors, pbr, maybe a few others that I'm forgetting

Offline wetwillie

  • goEMAW Poster of the WEEK
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 30431
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #1148 on: February 01, 2016, 07:13:36 PM »
Still zero percent chance of indictment under current administration.
When the bullets are flying, that's when I'm at my best

Offline CNS

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 36685
  • I'm Athletes
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #1149 on: February 01, 2016, 08:04:10 PM »
If the head of the FBI recommends charges, you think they won't?   Political suicide for all close to her.