Author Topic: Baylor  (Read 11136 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline kso_FAN

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 29506
    • View Profile
Re: Baylor
« Reply #50 on: February 14, 2014, 12:06:08 PM »


The Cats have been bad on the road. Even if you remove the game in Lawrence (Road 100 chart), K-State still got beat 1.09 - 1.00 in efficiency against UT, ISU, and WVU on the road.

I see 2 main areas of concern going into this game. First, BU is the best offensive boarding team in the league (OR% differential) and K-State needs to limit their 2nd shots. A big key in BU's losses to Top 100 teams at home is that they've played even on the offensive glass. Second, Baylor is the 2nd best 3PT shooting team in the league, hitting nearly 39.2% of their shots. This will be a real test for K-State's defense, especially with Baylor's length. Baylor blocks a lot of shots too, but it doesn't translate into great 2PT% defense as Big 12 teams shoot nearly 52% on 2s against them.

K-State's bad offense on the road should be able to get healthy against the Bears because Baylor's eFG% defense is awful (53.3% eFG%, last in the Big 12) and they don't force TOs (16.0, 8th in the Big 12). If the Cats can be reasonable on the offensive glass (<5% advantage for BU), shoot even on 3s, and win the battle on 2s (something K-State has been very good at) the Cats should get their 2nd road win of the year.

Cats 71 Bears 65

Offline Powercat Posse

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 4585
    • View Profile
Re: Baylor
« Reply #51 on: February 14, 2014, 03:02:59 PM »
Baylor just dominated Tcu both games on OR%.   They got 60% and 59%. The other 9 games they only got 33.9% on average. That makes me feel a little better than we can keep them under 35%

Just strange the Baylor is shooting 44.1% 3pt on the road and only 32.0% 3pt at home in Big 12 games.  I remember a few years, we were that way.... hitting like 27% at home and 38% on the road.     

Everyone not named Heslip is shooting 33.8%, so they are decent even if you take out his 48.9% and 8 3PTAs per Big 12 game. 

Offline Gooch

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 9491
    • View Profile
Re: Baylor
« Reply #52 on: February 14, 2014, 03:20:22 PM »
STTB! :woot: Thanks _Fan

Offline MadCat

  • TIME's Person Of The Year - 2006
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 13887
    • View Profile
Re: Baylor
« Reply #53 on: February 14, 2014, 03:47:55 PM »
a ritual only serving to perpetuate an institution that deserves to die.

I'm guessing you are either referring to the state or religion because marriage seems to be recognized by most, if not all, cultures.

Offline mocat

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 40454
    • View Profile
Re: Baylor
« Reply #54 on: February 15, 2014, 10:58:52 AM »
Guys I am going to be stuck in emporia :(

Offline steve dave

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 88345
  • Romantic Fist Attachment
    • View Profile
Re: Baylor
« Reply #55 on: February 15, 2014, 01:34:28 PM »
@919sports: Sources tell us that Shane Southwell is UNLIKELY to play tonight for #KState against the #Baylor Bears. Game is at 6pm on ESPNU.

Offline sunny_cat

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 14367
  • eff off
    • View Profile
Re: Baylor
« Reply #56 on: February 15, 2014, 01:35:47 PM »
welp

Offline 'taterblast

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 16940
  • Hi, I'm James McGill.
    • View Profile
Re: Baylor
« Reply #57 on: February 15, 2014, 01:47:58 PM »
we're fine

Offline kim carnes

  • chingon!
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 13843
    • View Profile
Re: Baylor
« Reply #58 on: February 15, 2014, 01:51:16 PM »
i think we lost.  a lot of dumbasses on this board don't realize how important shane is to this team.

Offline Powercat Posse

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 4585
    • View Profile
Re: Baylor
« Reply #59 on: February 15, 2014, 02:08:43 PM »
If Shane is a no-go, then Nino obviously starts.   DJamer will get more minutes and we could even go small with Westicles playing the 4.  Might have too if Gip or Nino get foul issues

Offline kim carnes

  • chingon!
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 13843
    • View Profile
Re: Baylor
« Reply #60 on: February 15, 2014, 02:10:45 PM »
I still think we have a great chance though so long as jevon doesn't play.  We are a different (much better) team without him.

Offline Jackstack99EMAW

  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 1355
    • View Profile
Re: Baylor
« Reply #61 on: February 15, 2014, 02:49:06 PM »
We'll be fine without him.  We'll miss his rebounding and passing a bit though.

Offline TownieCat

  • Fattyfest Champion
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 6993
  • I have no rhythm.
    • View Profile
Re: Baylor
« Reply #62 on: February 15, 2014, 02:54:47 PM »
Shane being out hurts. Does anyone know the status of Will's undershirt? This is more crucial to our team's play.

Offline EllRobersonisInnocent

  • PCKK7DC Survivor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *******
  • Posts: 7690
    • View Profile
Re: Baylor
« Reply #63 on: February 15, 2014, 02:55:35 PM »
Considering Shane sucks, I'm not too worried about him being out.

Offline sunny_cat

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 14367
  • eff off
    • View Profile
Re: Baylor
« Reply #64 on: February 15, 2014, 02:58:30 PM »
Considering Shane sucks, I'm not too worried about him being out.

lol

Offline kim carnes

  • chingon!
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 13843
    • View Profile
Re: Baylor
« Reply #65 on: February 15, 2014, 03:05:46 PM »
We'll be fine without him.  We'll miss his rebounding and passing a bit though.

You are a top ten dumbass on this site.

Offline kso_FAN

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 29506
    • View Profile
Re: Baylor
« Reply #66 on: February 15, 2014, 03:09:14 PM »
Shane would be a significant loss, you are at best being shortsighted to think otherwise.

Offline AtlantaWildcat

  • Fan
  • *
  • Posts: 56
    • View Profile
Re: Baylor
« Reply #67 on: February 15, 2014, 03:13:42 PM »
So maybe I haven't been up to date on what is going on but  can someone tell me why jevon isn't playing? Coaches choice? Discipline?

Offline sunny_cat

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 14367
  • eff off
    • View Profile
Re: Baylor
« Reply #68 on: February 15, 2014, 03:14:45 PM »
So maybe I haven't been up to date on what is going on but  can someone tell me why jevon isn't playing? Coaches choice? Discipline?

Would like to know if someone has a definitive answer to this. ^

Offline Jackstack99EMAW

  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 1355
    • View Profile
Re: Baylor
« Reply #69 on: February 15, 2014, 03:17:49 PM »
We'll be fine without him.  We'll miss his rebounding and passing a bit though.

You are a top ten dumbass on this site.
:thumbs:

Offline gatoveintisiet

  • Combo-Fan
  • **
  • Posts: 772
  • the maverick
    • View Profile
Re: Baylor
« Reply #70 on: February 15, 2014, 03:18:56 PM »
Bad basketball play, he will be real good once oscar can oscar him up tho.
You are dipping into the Kool Aid and you don't even know what flavor it is.

Offline kim carnes

  • chingon!
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 13843
    • View Profile
Re: Baylor
« Reply #71 on: February 15, 2014, 03:20:57 PM »
So maybe I haven't been up to date on what is going on but  can someone tell me why jevon isn't playing? Coaches choice? Discipline?

Would like to know if someone has a definitive answer to this. ^


I have a definitive answer, he sucks. He is not injured, we know that because he played against Texas.

Offline AtlantaWildcat

  • Fan
  • *
  • Posts: 56
    • View Profile
Re: Baylor
« Reply #72 on: February 15, 2014, 04:18:12 PM »
I don't think that it is a fact that he sucks he just can't score. Remember, Felix from Texas was not a good scorer last year and he was just a guy who could distribute the basketball which is what Jevon can do. Felix, this year can score with some of the best in the league.

Offline sunny_cat

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 14367
  • eff off
    • View Profile
Re: Baylor
« Reply #73 on: February 15, 2014, 06:37:17 PM »
So maybe I haven't been up to date on what is going on but  can someone tell me why jevon isn't playing? Coaches choice? Discipline?

Would like to know if someone has a definitive answer to this. ^


I have a definitive answer, he sucks. He is not injured, we know that because he played against Texas.

Lol, shut up, Kim. Anyone other than Kim have an answer? Just a bad week of practice I guess?

Offline kim carnes

  • chingon!
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 13843
    • View Profile
Re: Baylor
« Reply #74 on: February 15, 2014, 06:39:12 PM »
So maybe I haven't been up to date on what is going on but  can someone tell me why jevon isn't playing? Coaches choice? Discipline?

Would like to know if someone has a definitive answer to this. ^


I have a definitive answer, he sucks. He is not injured, we know that because he played against Texas.

Lol, shut up, Kim. Anyone other than Kim have an answer? Just a bad week of practice I guess?

is this your first year watching sports?  like, you just seem so dumb.